Minister Nalbandian To Attend The "Alliance Of Civilizations" Forum

MINISTER NALBANDIAN TO ATTEND THE "ALLIANCE OF CIVILIZATIONS" FORUM IN ISTANBUL

armradio.am
03.04.2009 15:48

April 6-7 the Foreign Minister of Armenia, Edward Nalbandian, will
visit Istanbul to participate in the 2nd "Alliance of Civilizations"
forum under the auspices of the UN.

The aim of the "Alliance of Civilizations" forum is to develop the
intercultural understanding and cooperation. The first forum took
place in Madrid in January 2008.

The forum in Istanbul will feature senior officials from 30 countries –
Presidents, Prime Ministers and Foreign Ministers.

"Case Of Seven" Divided Into 6 Different Cases

"CASE OF SEVEN" DIVIDED INTO 6 DIFFERENT CASES

Noyan Tapan
Apr 1, 2009

YEREVAN, APRIL 1, NOYAN TAPAN. Examining prosecutor party’s petition
of partially renouncing criminal prosecution and changing the brought
accusation, Yerevan Kentron and Nork-Marash communities’ first
instance court presided over by judge Mnatsakan Martirosian, on April
1, on the "case of the seven" made a decision to quash it by part 1,
Article 300, RA Criminal Code (seizing the state power) and to stop
the criminal prosecution due to the lack of corpus delicti. The court
taking into consideration the amendments made to the RA Criminal
Code also decided to withdraw the charge by part 3, Article 225
(mass disorders accompanied by murders) from defendants’ charge.

By court’s decision only the case on the part of former RA Foreign
Minister Alexander Arzumanian and Suren Sirunian from the "case of
the seven" will continue to be examined by M. Martirosian. The above
mentioned defendants are accused by part 1, Article 225, RA Criminal
Code, organizing mass disorders. The court gave the defence party a
week to get acquainted with the new charge and fixed the next court
sitting for April 8.

The materials on the part of RA NA deputy Myasnik Malkhasian’s charge
were separated from the "case of the seven." They will be examined
at the same court. M. Malkhasian is accused by part 1, Article 225,
RA Criminal Code, organizing mass disorders and by part 2, Article
38-316, assisting with use of violence to a power representative
dangerous for his life or health.

The cases on the part of RA NA deputy Hakob Hakobian, Grigor
Voskerchian, and Shant Haroutiunian accused by part 1, Article 225,
RA Criminal Code will be also examined at the same court.

The materials on the part of RA NA deputy Sasun Mikayelian were sent
to the Kotayk region first instance court to examine them according
to jursidiction. S. Mikayelian is accused by part 1, Article 225 and
part 1 and part 2, Article 235, RA Criminal Code (keeping illegal
arms, ammunition).

The restraint chosen to all of seven defendants, arrest, was kept
unchanged.

Hovik Arsenian, A. Arzumanian’s and M. Malkhasian’s lawyer, assessed
court’s decision to divide the case as illegal. "On what basis was
this division done? As the charge mentions that these people "coming
to a criminal agreement organized mass disorders," therefore the case
should have been examined in a united way. Sending the materials on the
part of Sasun Mikayelian to Kotayk region first instance court is also
unintelligible: did he commit a mass disorder there?," the lawyer said.

H. Arsenian stated that the defence party is going to appeal against
the decision after receiving it.

Armenian PM Participates In Operation Of Space Information Receiver

ARMENIAN PM PARTICIPATES IN OPERATION OF SPACE INFORMATION RECEIVER STATION

ARMENPRESS
Apr 1, 2009

YEREVAN, APRIL 1, ARMENPRESS: Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan,
accompanied with the defense, economy, emergency situations ministers,
chairman of the state real estate cadastre committee, chairman of the
Armenian NA’s defense, national security and inner affairs permanent
commission, visited the center of "Geodesy and Mapping", participated
in the operation of space information receiver station. The prime
minister also walked over the center and got acquainted with the
working conditions, spoke with the employees.

Governmental press service told Armenpress that the goal of the
creation of the station is to get correct information about Armenia’s
territory by applying space technology.

Turkey’s Local Elections Forces Reconsideration Of Domestic And Fore

TURKEY’S LOCAL ELECTIONS FORCES RECONSIDERATION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN POLICIES
Saban Kardas

Jamestown Foundation
April 1 2009

The mixed results of the Turkish local elections on March 29 raised
questions over the future direction of the governing Justice and
Development Party’s (AKP) policies (EDM, March 31). The government
is unlikely to call a snap election, but the relative decline in the
AKP’s share of the vote will have significant implications for Turkey’s
political landscape, compelling more recognition of public opinion
and limiting the scope for assertive domestic and foreign policies.

Turkey’s local elections directly affect national politics, and have
been traditionally considered as a de facto vote of confidence for
the incumbent government. Moreover, prior to the March 29 elections,
the AKP pursued an aggressive campaign, which effectively turned
the local elections into a national referendum on its policies (EDM,
December 3). Now, having fallen below the thresholds it set for itself,
the AKP is seeking to redefine its priorities in Turkish politics.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan convened meetings with his cabinet
ministers and party members to assess the causes of the decline, while
considering a cabinet reshuffle and other changes within the party
(Star, March 31). Beyond these short term changes, the elections are
likely to have an enduring resonance on the AKP’s domestic and foreign
policies. Though it remains to be seen what path it will choose,
there appears to be two alternatives: either the AKP will follow a
reformist line and initiate major change, or it will prefer prudence
and avoid proactive policies.

The AKP’s core supporters, conservative center-right voters and
liberals, expect the government to abandon its complacency, and resume
domestic reforms. The EU and western observers also share similar
views. They believe that the AKP owes its past electoral success to
the pro-democratization agenda, which it adopted at the outset. For
them, the AKP’s recovery depends on its ability to revive its former
reformist image. If the AKP chooses this alternative, it will have
to refocus on constitutional changes, and intensify the EU membership
process in order to satisfy the reformists’ demands (Sabah, March 30).

Reformists also want the AKP to pursue a more proactive foreign
policy. Many observers had argued that following the local elections,
the government would press ahead with ambitious foreign policy
initiatives, including normalizing its relations with Armenia. EU
officials have suggested Turkey might take further steps in this
process, such as opening the border with Armenia following President
Barack Obama’s visit to Turkey on April 6-7 (Hurriyet, March 30).

It is unclear whether the AKP can fufil these expectations. The AKP
was founded as a party representing diverse interests, and, since
its establishment, Erdogan’s charismatic leadership has united the
various factions within the party. The sense of over-confidence imbued
by successive election victories and the presence of a strong leader,
led the AKP to develop a top-down approach to politics. The party’s
largely unchallenged dominance enabled it to conduct domestic and
foreign policies in an unrestricted manner.

The new voting patterns, however, are a stark reminder to the
AKP that the Turkish electorate is sensitive to the implications
of the government’s policies, and may withdraw their support when
necessary. The pre-occupation with re-election in the next national
elections, slated for 2011, will be the AKP’s main concern. Equally,
it will tread a fine line between satisfying the demands of its
core constituencies and responding to the challenges posed by
the opposition. Since the AKP cannot take its popular support for
granted, it might be more circumspect in its domestic and foreign
policies. These pressures, in turn, might curb the AKP’s activism,
and force it to adopt more conformist policies.

The government will need to form broad based coalitions with opposition
parties in order to implement its domestic reforms. However, having
gained ground on the AKP, major opposition parties such as the
Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP),
have little incentive to cooperate with the government. Moreover,
Erdogan’s antagonistic attitude during the election campaign
will complicate building coalitions with his rivals, who have
already announced their opposition to his position on constitutional
amendments (EDM, March 4). Against this background, relations between
the government and the opposition are likely to remain tense, and it
is questionable whether the AKP can deliver radical democratization
reforms (Radikal, March 30).

The AKP’s leftist, nationalist, secularist and Islamist opponents
are united in their objection to its foreign policy. They view the
AKP’s policies as a "betrayal of Turkey’s national interests,"
and they are critical of the AKP’s policy of rapprochement with
Armenia. Previously, the AKP largely ignored any negative public
reaction and the opposition, in its efforts to normalize relations
with Yerevan. However, now that the AKP is more vulnerable to public
scrutiny, faced with pressure from a stronger opposition, it may
adopt a cautious approach and avoid foreign policy risks. Therefore,
although normalizing relations with Armenia will continue, it may
be premature to expect radical steps, such as opening the border or
establishing diplomatic relations with Armenia (ANKA, March 30).

Artsvik Minasyan Will Lay Down His Mandate If…

ARTSVIK MINASYAN WILL LAY DOWN HIS MANDATE IF…

A1+
04:36 pm | April 01, 2009

Politics

"Surely, the election of Yerevan’s mayor is politicized. But we
cannot expect radical changes at this level. People should trust the
election," says Artsvik Minasyan who heads the candidate list of the
ARF Dashnaktsutyun at the forthcoming municipal elections.

The fact that only seven political forces – six parties and one
alliance, are running in the election for Yerevan’s Mayor testifies
to the progress of our political system. It means we are entering a
phase of consolidation.

In case the ARF loses the election, Artsvik Minasyan promises to lay
down his mandate and work in the Elder’s Council.

"I will lay down my mandate if our party decides that I can be more
useful as an alderman. Nevertheless, the ARF Dashnaktsutyun longs
for a victory like the other forces running in the election."

Unlike the Republican candidate Gagik Beglaryan, the ARF candidate is
less popular. Atrsvik Minasyan says he doesn’t take it seriously. "It’s
better to be less famous in the positive sense than famous in the
negative sense."

Realising the advantage of the incumbent Mayor, Artsvik Minasyan is
not afraid of competition. "I see no problem if the rules of the
game are maintained," the politician said, meaning the use of the
much talked administrative levers.

Artsvik Minasyan says Gagik Beglaryan has a chance to solve problems
in the city and increase his rating.

The President shouldn’t have appointed someone to the mayoral post
who would later be nominated by the Republican Party.

Asked about the draw for signatures, Atrsvik Minasyan said he has
already raised the issues in the ruling circles.

I think that administrative levers shouldn’t be employed and the
guarantees should be given by the HHK Leader.

Atrsvik Minasyan says after becoming mayor he will propose
collaboration both the authorities and the opposition.

BAKU: Ross Wilson: "Conclusion Of The Long Running Talks On Karabakh

ROSS WILSON: "CONCLUSION OF THE LONG RUNNING TALKS ON KARABAKH IS ANOTHER ESSENTIAL PIECE WHICH NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA CAN REINFORCE" – EXCLUSIVE

APA
March 31 2009
Azerbaijan

Washington. Zaur Hasanov – APA. "Conclusion of these long running talks
that Minsk group co-chairs have been trying to lead for many years on
Karabakh is another essential piece which negotiations between Turkey
and Armenia can reinforce," Ross Wilson, former U.S. ambassador to
Azerbaijan and Turkey told APA’s US bureau.

To the question "Turkey claims to consider the interest of Azerbaijan
in the negotiations with Armenia on the border issue. Is there anything
that Turkey can offer to Azerbaijan which will cover the damage of
the border reopening?" Ross Wilson said: "I think what is critical in
that complicated part of the world that try to put together some of
the building blocks that produce peace. Peace for the relationship
between Turkey and Armenia, resolution perhaps between Azerbaijan
and Armenia on Nagorno Karabakh conflict, be able to reach to move
forward. I think what Turkey and Armenia are doing can be part of
that. I don’t think that I can advice the Azerbaijani leadership and
Azerbaijani people," he said.

The diplomat said there is no military solution in the Caucasus or
anywhere else. "Conflict is a dead end. And the solution for the
conflict is from dialog and peaceful cooperation. That’s why Turkey
is on the right path," he said.

The former ambassador said he had no information that the borders
between Armenia and Turkey will be reopened in April.

Ross Wilson was U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan in 2000-2003, and to
Turkey in 2005-2008.

David Hakobyan’s Recipes

DAVID HAKOBYAN’S RECIPES

LRAGIR.AM
13:46:50 – 31/03/2009

The head of the Marxist party David Hakobyan, who took part in the
consultation session convoked by the Armenian president on March 20,
on March 31 at the Pastark press club, presented the recipes which
he had also presented to the president and the prime minister during
the close discussion.

David Hakobyan said that first of all, the business loans should be
raised directly through the state and not through the trade banks
mediation in which result the interests of the loan increase. Besides,
he proposes not letting the oligarchic capital to be in the national
assemble. "In other words, extraordinary parliamentary election,"
proposes the chief Marxist.

David Hakobyan suggests also creating favorable conditions for foreign
investments, as well as industrializing the capital which is being used
by only the service sphere now. Hakobyan noted that his prescriptions
are operated in the whole world, both in the U.S. and in Russia. At
the same time, the chief Marxist said that the president and the
prime minister turned out very polite and listened to him although
"their flunkies tried to obstacle."

But, David Hakobyan noted that the current president is not able to
fulfill these steps and a new president is necessary, a new leader of
the nation. By the way, in answer to the question whom he considers
such a person, David Hakobyan answered that the one who will be the
majority’s choice, adding that either he will give up politics or he
will become the president of the country.

The reporters also asked that while presenting the recipes to the
president, why not he told the president also that he is not able to
accomplish those steps and he had to leave and let an able person do
that. David Hakobyan stated that when those people were listening to
him very attentively and modestly, the important was to express his
ideas and not deal with mercantile questions.

What Were Those People And Serge Sargsyan Doing Unlike Robert Kochar

WHAT WERE THOSE PEOPLE AND SERGE SARGSYAN DOING UNLIKE ROBERT KOCHARYAN?
Hakob Badalyan

LRAGIR.AM
12:57:21 – 30/03/2009

On these days, the Chairman of National Self-Determination Union
stated that the main responsible for March 1 is Robert Kocharyan,
who make both the opposition and Serge Sargsyan faced with the fact,
doing him a bear’s favour. We have to note that this idea is not
mentioned for the first time, and not only Paruyr Hayrikyan expressed
it. Many "satellites" going round the government stated that Robert
Kocharyan’s to blame for everything and he put the country in such a
situation and also put Serge Sargsyan in a difficult state which the
poor Serge Sargsyan does not manage to overcome for such a long time.

This idea is difficult to disagree with, but before and after accepting
it, it is difficult to say that this reflect the reality. Of course,
the main responsible for the March 1 is Robert Kocharyan, just for
the simple reason that he was the president of the country at that
time. This is enough for him to be considered he main responsible,
let alone the fact that right he gave the order to use unprecedented
excessive force against the protesters. There is nothing to discuss
in this connection and Paruyr Hayrikyan and the others are of course
right. But this is just the half of the reality.

The problem is probably the following. When Robert Kocharyan is not
the president any more, when his impact on the governmental system
seems to be eliminated little be little, it does not seem that much
courageous to put all the blame for March 1 on him. Before, it was
all put on Levon Ter-Petrosyan, accusing him of being closed in his
house and not coming out to calm the protesters down for them not to
plunder shops and not set a fire to cars, that Levon Ter-Petrosyan was
holding 24-hour rallies with the aim of strikes that that tragedy had
been his main purpose since the beginning. Now the government and its
satellites realized that it is not effective from propaganda point of
view to put all the blame on Levon Ter-Petrosyan, because the public
will no swallow the bait as it knows who what was doing on those days.

That is why now it is more expedient to make a Kocharyan’s "victim"
Levon Ter-Petrosyan too, saying that Kocharyan present with a fait
accompli both the opposition and Serge Sargsyan, as he was "the
main provoker, which does not exist any more". So, Serge Sargsyan is
represented as an embodiment of tolerance and is equalled to Levon
Ter-Petrosyan to some extent, because both of them are "victims"
of Robert Kocharyan. In other words, the government and its servant
forces found the way of equalization of Serge Sargsyan to Levon
Ter-Petrosyan. But, this is only at the first sight.

The point is that the people who consider that the main provoker and
responsible for the crimes is Robert Kocharyan, forget that in the same
period they existed as well, moreover Serge Sargsyan was the Prime
Minister of Armenia. So, what were they doing when Robert Kocharyan
was organizing the March 1 in the centre of Yerevan? Where Paruyr
Hayrikyan was on March 1 or the other satellites of the government
which try to find their places around serge Sargsyan through various
public and state posts? Where they were and what were they doing not
to let Robert Kocharyan commit such bad things against the opposition
and Serge Sargsyan, and in fact against the State? Is not their
silence or their disappearance a worse or at least as bad thing as
what Robert Kocharyan did? Or may be at that time they were thinking
that "eliminating" Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s factor, Robert Kocharyan
was satisfying them too and was again opening the way to politics.

And the most important question: what was Serge Sargsyan himself
doing on March 1, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, the
head of the parliamentary majority, in the case when in result of the
2005 constitutional reforms this majority had greater credentials to
govern the country. Did he try to take Robert Kocharyan’s hand for
him to not to be have to be faced with the facts elected president,
or Serge Sargsyan was thinking that that was the only way of becoming
president? Robert Kocharyan made the country be faced with the
facts by March 1, but he made Serge Sargsyan face the Bible and the
Constitution, and gave him a possibility of presidential oath because
there was left no other way for it other than March 1.

Georgia: Acts of harassment against Mr. Arnold Stepanyan

URGENT APPEAL – THE OBSERVATORY
GEO 001 / 0309 / OBS 054
Acts of harassment
Georgia
March 30, 2009

The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint
programme of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), requests your urgent
intervention in the following situation in Georgia.

Description of the situation:

The Observatory has been informed by the Human Rights Centre (HRIDC)
about acts of harassment against Mr. Arnold Stepanyan, a defender of
the human rights of minorities in Georgia, Chairman of the human
rights NGO `Multinational Georgia’ and co-founder of the Multiethnic
Resource Centre for Civil Education Development.

According to the information received, on March 19, 2009, a district
police inspector visited, for the first time, the offices of the
Multiethnic Resource Centre for Civil Education Development, though
they are located next to the Ministry of Defence in an area closely
monitored by law enforcement bodies, and asked questions about the
organisation and its leadership.

On the same day, a person, who refused to identify himself, called and
asked a staff member whether Mr. Arnold Stepanyan was Chairman of
`Multinational Georgia’, whether he was at the moment in the office
and when he would come to the office.

In addition, on March 19, 2009, the Tax Inspection Office of the
Ministry of Finance closed down a small business called `Arnold
Stepanyan’, which was established in 2000 and was run by
Mr. Stepanyan’s father in his flat and a company called `Giperioni
Limited’, which was co-established by Mr. Arnold Stepanyan in 2006.

These acts follow the transmission to the Council of Europe, early
2009, of a critical alternative report on the protection of minority
rights in Georgia, of which Mr. Stepanyan, as Chairman of
`Multinational Georgia’, is one of the authors. Mr. Stepanyan is also
an expert in the field of inter-ethnic relations, an active member of
the Assembly of Tbilisi Armenians and Co-founder of the NGO Coalition
`For Democracy’. Finally, Mr. Stepanyan is a member of a group that
organised a demonstration held in Tbilisi on March 15, 2009 calling
for justice and freedom.

The Observatory expresses its deepest concern about these acts of
harassment against Mr. Arnold Stepanyan, which seem to merely aim at
sanctioning his human rights activities.

The Observatory recalls that as a Participating State of the
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Georgia
must conform with paragraph 8 of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly
Resolution on Strengthening OSCE Engagement with Human Rights
Defenders and National Human Rights Institutions, which states that
the OSCE Participating States recognise `the need for particular
attention, support and protection for human rights defenders by the
OSCE, its institutions and field operations, as well as by
participating States’.

The Observatory also urges the Georgian authorities to conform to the
Declaration of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on
Human Rights Defenders, so as to create an environment conducive to
human rights defenders, to take effective measures to protect,
promote, and respect them, to ensure their access to effective
remedies and to take action to prevent attacks and harassment against
them.

Action requested:

Please write to the Georgian authorities urging them to:

i. Take all necessary measures to guarantee, in all circumstances, the
physical and psychological integrity of Mr. Arnold Stepanyan;

ii. Conduct a prompt, effective, thorough, independent and impartial
investigation into the above-mentioned acts of harassment against Mr.
Arnold Stepanyan, the result of which must be made public, in order to
identify all those responsible, bring them before a competent,
independent and impartial tribunal and apply to them the penal, civil
and/or administrative sanctions provided by the law;

iii. Put an end to any act of harassment against Mr. Arnold Stepanyan
as well as against all human rights defenders in Georgia;

iv. Comply with the provisions of the Declaration on Human Rights
Defenders adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1998, in
particular Article 1, which states that `everyone has the right,
individually or collectively, to promote the protection and fulfilment
of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and
international levels’ and Article 12.2, which provides that `the State
shall take all necessary measures to ensure the protection by the
competent authorities of everyone, individually and in association
with others, against any violence, threats, retaliation, de facto or
de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary action
as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise of the rights
referred to in the present Declaration’;

v. Guarantee the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms in
accordance with the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and other
international human rights instruments ratified by Georgia.

Addresses:

* Mr. Mikhail Saakashvili, President, State Chancellery, 7 Ingorokhva
Street, 0134 Tbilisi, Georgia; Tel : (995 32) 28-27-13; (995 32)
28-24-00; (995 32)99 96 53; ( 995 32) 98-72-62, ( 995 32) / 99-87-50,
Fax: ( 995 32) 98-72-62 (99532) 28-27-68; (99532)28-27-14; E-mail:
[email protected], [email protected]
* Mrs. Eka Tkeshelashvili, Secretary of the National Security Council
of Georgia, 7, Ingorokhva Street. 0134 Tbilisi, Georgia, Tel: (995 32)
93 23 22 ; Fax: (995 32) 98 99 72 ; E-mail: [email protected]
* Mr. Ivane Merabishvili, Minister of Interior, Ministry of Interior
of Georgia, 10, Gulua street, Tbilisi, Georgia. Tel: (995 32) 74 62
50; +995 32 99 62 96 / 99 80 50 / 99 95 55/27 28 44/99 53 50/98 39 43;
Fax:(995 32) 98 71 46 / 99 95 24; E-mail: [email protected],
[email protected]
* Mr. Giorgi Arsenishvili, Head of the Parliamentary Committee on
Human Rights Petitions and Relations with the Civil Society,
Parliament of Georgia, 8 Rustaveli Avenue. 380018 Tbilisi, Georgia;
Tel: (995 32) 28 13 88; Fax: (995 32) 92 15 63. Email:
[email protected]
* Mr. Zurab Adeishvili, Minister of Justice, 19, Griboedov st,
Tbilisi, 0108, Georgia, Tel: (995 32) 93 27 21 / 93 50 49 / 75-82-22;
Fax: (995 32) 93 02 25 / 75-82-22 ; Email: [email protected]
* Mr. Sozar Subari, Ombudsman of Georgia, 11, Machabeli street,
Tbilisi 0107,Georgia, Phone: (995 32) 92 39 60 / 92 24 78 / 92 24 81 /
93 15 85; Fax: ( 995 32) 92 24 70; Email: [email protected]
* H.E Mr. Giorgi Gorgiladze, Ambassador, Permanent mission of Georgia
to the United Nations in Geneva, Rue Richard Wagner 1, 1202 Geneva,
Switzerland, Fax: + 41 22 733 90 33 ; Email:
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
* Diplomatic Mission of Georgia to Brussels, Belgium, Fax: + 32 2 732
85 47

Please also write to the diplomatic representations of Georgia in your
respective countries.

***

Geneva – Paris, March 30, 2009

Kindly inform the Observatory of any action undertaken quoting the code
number of this appeal in your reply.

The Observatory, a FIDH and OMCT venture, is dedicated to the
protection of human rights defenders and aims to offer them concrete
support in their time of need.

The Observatory was the winner of the 1998 Human Rights Prize of the
French Republic.

To contact the Observatory, call the emergency line:
Tel and fax OMCT : + 41 (0) 22 809 49 39 / + 41 (0) 22 809 49 29
Tel and fax: FIDH : +33 (0) 1 43 55 20 11 / 33 (0) 1 43 55 18 80
Email: [email protected]

A la Une – Karabakh: Equilibre assuree grace a l’armee armenienne

CollectifVAN.org
25 Mars 2009

A la Une – Karabakh: équilibre assurée grâce à l’armée arménienne
Publié le : 25-03-2009

Info Collectif VAN – – Le Collectif VAN vous
livre cette newsletter bimensuelle sur l’actualité politique,
économique et culturelle du Haut-Karabagh mise à notre
disposition par la Représentation de la République du
Haut-Karabagh en France.

Lors de sa rencontre avec les élèves et professeurs de
l’école nationale d’ingénieurs, le ministre de la
Défense de la République d’Arménie Seyran Ohanian
a déclaré que l’équilibre des forces dans la zone
du conflit du Karabagh était assuré grâce
à la qualité des forces armées
arméniennes.

Le ministre a rappelé à ce titre que le cessez-le-feu
signé en mai 1994 se maintenait sans intervention ou garantie
extérieures ce qui procure, aux yeux de M. Ohanian, un
caractère singulier au conflit du Karabagh.

www.collectifvan.org