ANCA Concerned With Protocols Initiated For Improving Armenian-Turki

ANCA CONCERNED WITH PROTOCOLS INITIATED FOR IMPROVING ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS

Noyan Tapan
Sep 3, 2009

WASHINGTON, SEPTEMBER 3, NOYAN TAPAN. The Armenian National Committee
of America (ANCA) gave the Members of Congress a letter dated by
September 1 presenting its reservations and fears regarding the
Protocols initiated for improving Armenian-Turkish relations.

According to the Asbarez daily, it was stressed in the letter signed
by ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian that Armenia being blockaded
by Turkey now is under intense economic and diplomatic pressure, and
that is why it has forcedly accepted such conditions which contains
danger for its interests, rights, safety, and even future. He adds
that the attempts of Turkey to submit the issue of Armenian Genocide
for the discussion of the commission of historians raise more anxiety
and they are the part of the long-term policy of Ankara of denying
that historical fact.

Hamparian stresses that such an attempt to establish normal relations
between Turkey and Armenia can not last long as it is not based on
the historical fact of the Armenian Genocide.

It is also mentioned in the letter that the day after publishing the
news about the Protocols on bilateral relations the Turkish authorities
broke their word on establishing relations without pre-conditions when
they assured the Azeri authorities that it is impossible to open the
borders between Turkey and Armenia without settlement of the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict.

A. Hamparian calls in his letter to apply to these four main events:

– To persuade the President of the United States to honor his pledge
to recognize the Armenian Genocide.

– To gain credits from Washington that it will not, in any way, accept
the suggestion of submitting the issue of the Armenian Genocide to the
"historical commission" as such a step will cast a doubt on the fact
of the genocide.

– The U.S. Ministry of Foreign Affairs must hold Turkey accountable
for its failure to honor its commitments.

– The U.S. Congress should move quickly to pass the Armenian Genocide
Resolution.

Comments On The Armenian-Turkish Relations From Stepanakert

COMMENTS ON THE ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS FROM STEPANAKERT
Lena Badeyan

"Radiolur"
02.09.2009 16:22

Commenting on the latest developments in the Armenian-Turkish
relations, ex-President of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic Arkady
Ghukasyan noted that "we have all chances to reach what we want and
there is no need to give way to panic." "Some tactical changes do
not mean changes in strategy," he said.

NKR President Bako Sahakyan noted that those in Karabakh are closely
watching the development of events and they see no danger. According
to him, there have been only positive developments, because the
international community will see which nation is really committed to
the normalization of those relations.

"We have to do with a country, where deception is part of policy,"
Bako Sahakyan said. "Turkey’s controversial statements do not inspire
hope for honest and sincere relations," he noted.

As for the possible developments in the Karabakh process in autumn,
Bako Sahakyan noted: "We have no grounds to doubt whether the
Co-Chairs are really interested in solving the issue. But there can
be no activeness in the process, since the main party is not involved
in the talks. We can speak about an active period only after we review
the format of the negotiatoions," NKR President said.

Armenia, Turkey Won’t Discuss The Deepest Source Of Their Enmity

ARMENIA, TURKEY WON’T DISCUSS THE DEEPEST SOURCE OF THEIR ENMITY

PanARMENIAN.Net
01.09.2009 14:39 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia and Turkey, bitter foes for a century, took a
step toward reconciliation Monday by announcing they would launch final
talks aimed at establishing diplomatic ties. But they won’t discuss
the deepest source of their enmity: the World War I-era massacres of
Armenians under Ottoman rule, the Associated Press reports.

Both sides said in a joint statement they expected the talks to
take six weeks and to end with an agreement setting up and developing
ties. The two countries, whose shared border is closed, are U.S. allies
and came under American and European pressure to move toward peace. The
parliaments of the two countries must ratify a deal on diplomatic
normalization, and in Turkey, nationalist sentiment and suspicion
about Armenian intentions is particularly high, the article says.

The author also reminds of the lingering Karabakh conflict.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said Monday that Turkey would
"guard" Azerbaijan’s interest during its reconciliation with Armenia,
saying in comments broadcast by NTV television that "our aim is to
establish stability in the Caucasus."

Turkey, however, clearly seeks to enhance its growing image as a
regional statesman and a coveted ally of world powers in a strategic
and often unstable region. The rapprochement with Armenia coincides
with efforts to resolve a long-running feud with Turkey’s Kurdish
minority – issues that are vital to Turkish efforts to earn membership
in the European Union, the article says.

One of the biggest disputes between the neighboring countries is
over the World War I-era massacre of up to 1.5 million Armenians,
the first genocide of the 20th century. Turkey denies that the deaths
constituted genocide, contending the toll has been inflated and that
the casualties were victims of civil war.

Armenian President Serge Sargsyan indicated the dispute would not be
a deal-breaker between the two neighbors.

"It’s important ical justice be restored. It’s important that our
nations are able to establish normal relations," Sarkisian said in
an interview published Monday by the BBC Russian service. "But we do
not regard a recognition of genocide as a preliminary condition for
establishing relations."

Turkey was one of the first countries to recognize Armenia’s
independence in 1991, but the two countries never established
diplomatic relations and their joint border has been closed since
1993 over the conflict in Nagorno Karabakh.

According To Kiro Manoyan, Armenian-Turkish Protocols Contain At Lea

ACCORDING TO KIRO MANOYAN, ARMENIAN-TURKISH PROTOCOLS CONTAIN AT LEAST THREE UNACCEPTABLE POINTS

Noyan Tapan
Sep 1, 2009

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 1, NOYAN TAPAN. The draft Armenian-Turkish protocols
published on August 31 contain at least three unacceptable points,
which Turkey has so far put forward as preconditions for normalizing
the relations with Armenia. Kiro Manoyan, a representative of the
ARF Political and Hay Dat Office, stated this on September 1.

According to him, Turkey continues to indicate the Nagorno Karabakh
problem as a precondition for normalizing the relations, which in
particular is evident from Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s
statement to Hurriyet newspaper. "Our president’s statement about
this does not correspond to reality," Kiro Manoyan said, meaning the
speech that Serzh Sargsyan made at the meeting of the MFA staff and
heads of Armenian diplomatic missions and consulates on the same day.

The second unacceptable circumstance, in the words of K. Manoyan, is
that in the indicated document the existing Armenian-Turkish border
is recognized as a legal border, which may invalidate the Armenian
people’s right to their historical lands.

The third negative point, according to the ARF representative, is
that the protocols envisage establishing a sub-commission on the
historical dimension. K. Manoyan said this means that Armenia gives
up the international recognition of the 1915 Armenian Genocide.

"If Turkey is sincere and it wants to know the historical truth,
it should create the necessary atmosphere in Turkey and hold free
discussions on the Genocide. It may involve experts of other countries,
but not Armenian experts. We have no business to do there," K. Manoyan
noted.

He said that another flaw of the proposed documents is that they do
not establish the dates for the normalization of Armenian-Turkish
relations. In particular the Armenian legislation does not envisage
ratification (by parliament) of a document on the establishment of
diplomatic relations. In his words, "by envisaging this requirement
in the protocols, we provide the Turkish side with the opportunity
to endlessly delay the process".

Finally, according to K. Manoyan, the purpose of "internal discussion"
of the protocols is not clear. "We do not know if there will be any
change in these documents as a result of discussions," he said.

Secret Of Jrvezh Forest Park

SECRET OF JRVEZH FOREST PARK

ArmInfo
2009-08-31 14:45:00

ArmInfo. The Ministry of Nature Protection of Armenia recognized the
alienation of the land area of 21,76 ha from "Jrvezh" Forest Park.

As "EcoLur" organization told ArmInfo, in reply to "EcoLur" request to
clarify, whether a land area has been actually alienated from "Jrvezh"
Forest Park situated on the crossroad of Garni-Yerevan highway,
Samvel Amirkhanyan, Head of Administration of the Ministry of Nature
Protection of RA, (letter numbered 5/22/1052 dated on 20.08.09),
in particular, brought the following clarifications:

"The mapping and zoning of "Jrvezh" Forest Park, a part of "Forest Park
Complex" State Non- Commercial Organization of the Ministry of Nature
Protection of RA, were carried out in 2007-2008. During the mapping
and zoning some issues were revealed that refer to biodiversity,
number and spreading of plant and animal species. As a result of the
territory reconsideration, more exact zoning and mapping of the forest
park, the territory of the forest park made up 400,43 confirmed by
the government decision Ñ~L 684 Ð~L dated on 18.06.09 without the
land area of 21, 76 ha, which is the subject of the enquiry.

Basing on the fact that the aforementioned land area bordering
with Voghchaberd and Jrvezh Communities, as well as with
Yerevan-Garni-Voghchaberd highway has no fence (only 150 m out of more
than 1150 m), as well as on the fact20that this land area presents
difficulties in regard to care, safety and management.

Before the mapping, the size of "Jrvezh" Forest Park territory made
up 400 ha, and, as a matter of fact, it remains unchanged, as other
territories rich in biodiversity were joined to the forest park."

Thus, the Ministry of Nature Protection of RA approved the fact of
exchange of territories in "Jrvezh" Forest Park. What about the fact
that land area presents difficulties in regard to care, safety and
management, "EcoLur" invites the representatives of the Ministry to get
familiar with the splendid pine forest growing in the alienated land
area, to walk along the natural border separating this land area from
the highway, as well as to view the new stony and arid territories.

It should be noted when the actual exchange of the territories took
place in 2007, the Head of "Forest Park Complex" State Non-Commercial
Organization was Ashot Avalyan who is Deputy Head of Administration
of the Ministry of Nature Protection of RA at present.

President Sargsyan Visits The Learning Forum Camp

PRESIDENT SARGSYAN VISITS THE LEARNING FORUM CAMP

armradio.am
28.08.2009 14:14

President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan visited the Learning Forum Camp
of the All-Armenian youth movement Miasin (Together) on the shore of
Lake Sevan.

The movement is devoted to reforms and modernization of the country. As
the president mentioned, that he was glad to see hundreds of young
people who lived together in the camp, and according to him, that
experience would be very useful for them in future.

President of Armenia wished success to the movement and expressed
readiness to promote their programs and initiatives.

Stepanakert And Baku Main Sides In Karabakh Conflict – Armenian Mini

STEPANAKERT AND BAKU MAIN SIDES IN KARABAKH CONFLICT – ARMENIAN MINISTRY

Interfax
Aug 26 2009
Russia

Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan are the main sides in the conflict
over the self-proclaimed republic, Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister
Shavarsh Kocharyan told Russia’s Ekho Moskvy radio.

"The conflict has its two main sides. They are the self-proclaimed
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic and Azerbaijan, which tried to solve the
problem of the self-proclaimed nation using force. The republic of
Armenia is the third party that was dragged into this conflict,"
Kocharyan said.

The authorities in Baku are trying to portray this problem as
a conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, "but the root of the
problem is the self-determination of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh,
and a conflict erupted because of Azerbaijan’s policy of force,"
the Armenian diplomat said.

"Azerbaijan is continuing its saber rattling. Its condition is as
follows: either it receives everything, or the region gets a war.

highest-ranking officials, including the president himself, have
repeatedly spoken about military methods [to solve this problem]. It
has happened despite the signing of the Meindorf declaration, in
which the parties pledged not to use force," he said.

"Park Of Cross-Stones" To Be Established In Gyumri

"PARK OF CROSS-STONES" TO BE ESTABLISHED IN GYUMRI

ARMENPRESS:
August 26, 2009
Gyumri

"Park of Cross-Stones" will be established in Gyumri on the initiative
of its mayor. Grigor Aghanyan, head of the Culture Department of the
Gyumri Municipality, told Armenpress that according to the initial
agreement the park will be located in the territory near St. Virgin
Mary Church. Cross-stones of different stones are expected to find
place in the park.

The main works of creating the park will kick off next year and by
that time the number and types of the cross-stones will be clarified.

CHP’s Ilhan Kesici: Don’t judge EU based on Sarkozy, Merkel

Today’s Zaman , Turkey
Aug 24 2009

CHP’s İlhan Kesici: Don’t judge EU based on Sarkozy, Merkel

CHP İstanbul deputy İlhan Kesici spoke with Today’s
Zaman in an interview, sharing his thoughts on European attitudes
toward Turkey, the country’s Westernization efforts and the new world
order. Kesici is one of the names transferred into the Republican
People’s Party (CHP) from the center-right during the July 22, 2007,
elections.

He says Turkey’s efforts to become part of the West have been ongoing
since the 1800s, remarking that the nation has succeeded in this goal
economically, but has yet to achieve political integration.

Kesici takes issue with rising anti-European Union sentiment in
Turkey, saying his party had been engaged in behind-the-scenes
contacts on the issue.

One of the important center-right figures in Turkey, Kesici urged that
Turkey’s relations with the EU not be viewed as a tool for domestic
politics or as currency to win votes. `The way to enter the EU is to
fulfill the requirements of Copenhagen and Maastricht,’ he said. The
CHP politician does not place the blame on Turkey for not yet acceding
to the union as other nations have done in less time. `Croatia began
its bid in 2003 and in all likelihood will become an EU member in
2010. We’ve been trying to gain membership since 1950. It needs to be
accepted that the EU is treating us differently. We applied for
membership when there were only six members in the union. ¦ It’s
certain that they haven’t treated us justly,’ he asserted.

Kesici cites cultural differences as the top reason he feels the EU
has not yet accepted Turkey. `And by cultural differences, I mean
religion. The second difference is a historical one. Despite the fact
that 350 years have passed since 1683, Europeans still haven’t been
able to forget those days. The third point is Turkey’s population. We
can’t digest Turkey, they say. The fourth point is that we’re
poor. The EU budget isn’t enough to develop undeveloped countries,’ he
said.

He named another reason as Turkey’s many borders with Iraq, Syria and
Iran, but he says opposition rooted in this reason is based on the
idea that the EU is a Christian club. `This isn’t an approach
appropriate to the 21st century. They did the same thing in Bosnia,’
he said.

Despite all this, the CHP deputy says Turkey should not give up on its
European dreams. `The struggle needs to continue; it can’t be given up
on. We need to be sure of the fact that Merkel and also Sarkozy are
just temporary — at the end of the day, these leaders will be shifted
out. Right now, they’re turning this issue of Turkish membership into
a tool for domestic politics. Those who have turned such matters into
domestic political tools have never become esteemed statesmen; we need
to ignore this attitude of theirs. What we need to do is work with our
negotiation partners and finish our work — and we need to do this
quickly. We can’t just get angry and quit. Are Sarkozy and Merkel
pulling out of the negotiations? They’re not. And we won’t either,’ he
said.

Turkey must develop regional, global visions
Kesici also shared his views on Turkey’s status as a rising power,
saying Turkey lacks a global vision and needs to develop one. `There
are two important pedestals of a global vision. The first is democracy
and market economy; the second is our most basic alliance, the
Atlantic alliance; and this has two important veins. One is NATO, and
the other is the EU. Israel must also be seen as part of this
alliance,’ he said. The deputy emphasized that Turkey needs a regional
vision as well, noting that a strong global vision cannot compensate
for a lack of regional and neighborly relations. `We need to be in
harmony with the world, but also in harmony with our region. The
dominant religion in our region is Islam. And 99 percent of the
world’s 150 million Turks identify with this religion. Outside of the
Gagauzian Turks, all Turks have chosen to be Muslims. Twenty percent
of the 150 million Arabs, though, are Christian. As Westerners have
seen, not all
Arabs are Muslim. So Turkey needs to be in harmony with Islam and
also with the Muslim countries,’ he said.

As for the most important components of a regional vision, Kesici says
the most important country west of the Caspian for Turkey is Russia,
whom he says Turkey must be at peace with and in harmony with. `In the
East Caspian, there are the Turkic republics; we have a bond of
kinship with them. We need to create a vision regarding all of
Eurasia. If you’re preparing a Nabucco energy project, then what needs
to fill the pipes are Kazakh and Turkmen gas. ¦ We must ensure that
they become partners in the project. Perhaps in later stages Iraqi and
Iranian gas can be used. And we also can’t forget about the Balkans,’
he said. In terms of regional problems, he emphasized that the issues
of Cyprus and Turkey’s relations with Armenia also needed to be
resolved.

The first major step, he emphasizes, remains to ascend to the EU. `We
need to take up political membership within the union. We need to turn
economic cooperation into political cooperation,’ he said.

24 August 2009, Monday
ERCAN YAVUZ ANKARA