ANTELIAS: Children celebrate Palm Sunday in Antelias

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version:

CHILDREN CELEBRATE PALM SUNDAY IN ANTELIAS

Thousands of Armenian children and their parents came to Antelias on April
1 on the occasion of Palm Sunday, which marks Jesus Christ’s triumphal entry
into Jerusalem.

A procession of children was formed during the Holy Mass, making a round
tour in the courtyard of the Catholicosate and returning to the Cathedral.

Bishop Nareg Alemezian conducted the Holy Mass and His Holiness Aram I
delivered his Pontifical address from the balcony of the Veharan, given the
large number of people present. He greeted all Armenian children around the
world, considering Jesus Christ’s entry into Jerusalem to be the holiday of
the Armenian family and the Armenian child.

His Holiness then received the unending queue of children who went up to
the Veharan with their parents to kiss his right hand. He distributed gifts
to all children, filling their hearts with holiday joy.

The Pontiff had declared Palm Sunday the Day of Armenian Children 10 years
ago and ever since then, he presents gifts to all the children visiting the
Veharan, making the memory of Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem an
unforgettable day for them.

Later in the afternoon, a service for the "Gate-Opening" was held. This is
an ancient Armenian liturgical ritual. During the forty days of lent the
curtain on the altar remains closed. On the afternoon of the Palm Sunday,
the priest kneels in the front of the closed curtain and asks for
compassionate forgiveness on behalf of the community gathered in the church.
The service was presided by His Holiness Aram I and conducted by Bishop
Nareg, who delivered a sermon on Jesus Christ’s second coming.

Thus, with the services of Palm Sunday and "Gate-Opening", the Armenian
Church entered the last week of Jesus Christ’s earthly life, the Holy Week,
during which the faithful live, liturgically, the events of the last week of
Christ’s life on earth and the torture he bore for the sake of saving
humanity.

##
View the photos here:

*****

The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the history and
the mission of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician Catholicosate, the
administrative center of the church is located in Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.cathcil.org/
http://www.cathcil.org/v04/doc/Armenian.htm
http://www.cathcil.org/v04/doc/Photos/Photos70.htm
http://www.cathcil.org/v04/doc/Photos/Photos71.htm
http://www.cathcil.org/

ANKARA: Refutation of the Armenian resolution, article by article –

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
March 31 2007

Refutation of the Armenian resolution, article by article-5

by
Prof. Dr. KEMAL ÇÝÇEK*

(Article 21) President Ronald Reagan in proclamation number 4838,
dated April 22, 1981, stated in part `like the genocide of the
Armenians before it, and the genocide of the Cambodians, which
followed it — and like too many other persecutions of too many other
people –the lessons of the Holocaust must never be forgotten.’

If the fact that the speechwriter of President Ronald Reagan was
Kenneth L. Khachigian is taken into account, one can understand why
the president used this terminology as opposed to that of his
predecessors.

(Article 22) House Joint Resolution 247, adopted on Sept. 10, 1984,
resolved: `[t]hat April 24, 1985, is hereby designated as `National
Day of Remembrance of Man’s Inhumanity to Man,’ and the President of
the United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day as a
day of remembrance for all the victims of genocide, especially the
one and one-half million people of Armenian ancestry.’

Even after such a decision, it is important to note that US
presidents have since then not recognized April 24 as `Armenian
Genocide Day.’ The resolution of the House of Representatives was
certainly a political one; few of undersigned persons cared about its
truthfulness.

(Article 23) In August 1985, after extensive study and deliberation,
the United Nations SubCommission on Prevention of Discrimination and
Protection of Minorities voted 14-1 to accept a report entitled
`Study of the Question of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide,’ which stated `[t]he Nazi aberration has unfortunately
not been the only case of genocide in the 20th century. Among other
examples, which can be cited as qualifying, are….the Ottoman massacre
of Armenians in 1915-1916.’

This is one of the untrue articles of the resolution. The UN has
never accepted the report of Mr. Whitaker and as we have shown below,
the Subcommittee did not receive the report in question, but only
`took note of.’ (File E/CN.4/1986/5-E/CN.4/Feb.2/1985/57; Para.57)
and instead of that, it is added to the special report as `noted’
(E/CN.4/1986/5 E/CN.4/Feb.2/1985/57 page 99. Para 1). Unfortunately,
we have encountered that big lie even in scientific meetings.

(Article 24) This report also explained that `[a]t least 1,000,000,
and possibly well over half of the Armenian population, are reliably
estimated to have been killed or death marched by independent
authorities and eye-witnesses. This is corroborated by reports in
United States, German and British archives and of contemporary
diplomats in the Ottoman Empire, including those of its ally
Germany….’

It is obvious that Mr. Whitaker’s report was prepared with the
direction of Armenian historians. As a matter of fact, in the meeting
of the subcommittee, US representative Mr. Carey said: `All the
existing sources have not been taken into account and the matter has
not been elaborated sufficiently in depth. The question of genocide
has not been elucidated sufficiently.’ Carey added, `He was not in a
position to approve any resolution on this issue.’ In the same
meeting of the committee, French representative Mr. Joinet said, `The
debate on Mr. Whitaker’s report is in fact a debate on history.’

(Article 25) The United States Holocaust Memorial Council, an
independent federal agency, unanimously resolved on April 30, 1981,
that the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum would include the
Armenian Genocide in the Museum and has since done so.

This resolution cannot be taken as a proof of the international
acceptance of the so-called Armenian genocide, nor does it strengthen
the false Armenian thesis.

(Article 26) Reviewing an aberrant 1982 expression (later retracted)
by the United States Department of State asserting that the facts of
the Armenian Genocide may be ambiguous, the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia in 1993, after a review of
documents pertaining to the policy record of the United States, noted
that the assertion on ambiguity in the United States record about the
Armenian Genocide `contradicted longstanding United States policy and
was eventually retracted.’

Like other decisions that were taken without consulting the Turkish
side, this resolution also is not obligatory.

(Article 27) On June 5, 1996, the House of Representatives adopted an
amendment to House Bill 3540 (the Foreign Operations, Export
Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997) to reduce
aid to Turkey by $3 million (an estimate of its payment of lobbying
fees in the United States) until the Turkish government acknowledged
the Armenian Genocide and took steps to honor the memory of its
victims.
Again this decision was taken under the pressure of the effective
Armenian lobbying in the House of Representatives. Unfortunately, the
politicians are not very interested in reality. In fact, Turkey has a
very strict policy concerning US aid, and will not accept any
stipulation of this kind in order to benefit from US aid.
(Article 28) President William Jefferson Clinton, on April 24, 1998,
stated: `This year, as in the past, we join with Armenian-Americans
throughout the nation in commemorating one of the saddest chapters in
the history of this century, the deportations and massacres of a
million and a half Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in the years
1915-1923.’
As it is seen, President Clinton talked about massacres and
deportations but did not define that tragedy as `genocide.’ Genocide
is a crime against humanity as defined by the UN Convention of 1948.
Moreover, `massacre’ and `genocide’ are very different terms from the
perspective of law. No need to say that massacres may occur anywhere
and anytime during wars.
(Article 29) President George W. Bush, on April 24, 2004, stated: `On
this day, we pause in remembrance of one of the most horrible
tragedies of the 20th century, the annihilation of as many as 1.5
million Armenians through forced exile and murder at the end of the
Ottoman Empire.’
Again the events that took place in Anatolia between 1915 and 1923
were defined as tragedy in the speech of President Bush. A moment of
silence for the victims of war is a duty for all human beings.
(Article 30) Despite the international recognition and affirmation of
the Armenian Genocide, the failure of the domestic and international
authorities to punish those responsible for the Armenian Genocide is
a reason why similar genocides have recurred and may recur in the
future, and that a just resolution will help prevent future
genocides.
Unfortunately those who are saying this carried out a massacre in
Hocalý in Feb. 26, 1992, deported 180,000 Azeris from the Karabag
enclave and occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s territory. Today
there are more than 1 million refugees in the city of Baku from the
occupied areas and these people live in deplorable conditions.

* Head of Black Sea Technical University, Faculty of Arts & Sciences;
Turkish Historical Association, Armenian Desk

Armenian Taxmen Collect 20 Billion Drams In February

ARMENIAN TAXMEN COLLECT 20 BILLION DRAMS IN FEBRUARY

ARMENPRESS
Mar 30 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 30, ARMENPRESS: Armenian taxmen collected 19.9 billion
Drams in February in taxes and duties, up from 16.6 billion collected
in January.

The press office of the state taxation service said 730 million Drams
were collected as excise taxes, profit taxes amounted to 4.9 billion
Drams while income taxes rose to 3.2 billion Drams.

The taxmen collected also 1.4 billion Drams in state dues, 644 million
Drams as simplified tax, 1.9 billion as fixed tax and payments. They
also collected 6.6 billion Drams in mandatory social payments.

NKR Army Ready To Resist Any Assault Against Its Air Space

NKR ARMY READY TO RESIST ANY ASSAULT AGAINST ITS AIR SPACE

ArmRadio.am
31.03.2007 13:45

NKR Army is always ready to resist any assault against its air space,
Press Secretary of the NKR Ministry of Defense Senor Asratyan told
ArmInfo, commenting on the reports of the Azeri media on the flight
of Azerbaijani MiG-29 fighters along the contact line between the
Armed Forces of Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh.

According to Senor Asratyan, Azerabijani planes periodically carry
out such flights. "So far there has been no case of violation of the
NKR air borders.

However, if it occurs, we are ready to prevent such attempts and
resist any assault against our air space," Senor Asratyan underlined.

ANKARA: Best Wishes For ‘Akdamar’

BEST WISHES FOR ‘AKDAMAR’
Taha Akyol, Milliyet

Turkish Daily News
March 29 2007

The Directorate General of Press and Information has directed foreign
reporters in Turkey for the coverage of the Akdamar Church’s opening
ceremony to professor Ýlber Ortaylý, world famous historian and the
director of the Topkapý Palace.

An Italian journalist poses a question to Ortaylý, asking whether
Turkey has started to clean its past in order to be a European Union
member. Ortaylý responds: "First you better learn what history is and
then you wouldn’t ask such non-sense questions. Do you pose such a
question to the director of the Louvres Museum? If this is the EU’s
mentality as well, that institution wouldn’t be straightened up
either. We don’t want such an EU!"

To a question about the "genocide" by a German reporter, Ortaylý
answered, "First learn the role of Germans in those incidents, then
come to me and ask about their nature!"

I, on the other hand, asked Ortaylý about the Akdamar Church. With
his endless lore on history, he answered:

"The Akdamar Church is one of the three Armenian masterpieces in
history. It was built in 915-921 by the King Gagik of the Armenian
Vaspuragan dynasty. The structure is quite important in terms of its
history and iconography."

Looking at history:

The conversations above reflect the difference between history
and politics. A journalist acting on political prejudices is after
sensational news pieces; he doesn’t ask about history or architecture,
but voices worn-out prejudices.

In 1997, we visited Hungary together with President Suleyman Demirel
for the opening of the Tomb of Gulbaba, a Bektaþi saint, in Budapest
and the statute of Suleyman the Magnificent built by Hungarians in
Mohacs… We also visited the mosque turned into a museum in the
birthplace of the Turkish historian Pecevi Ýbrahim Efendi in Pec city.

Later on, we saw an epigraph in Hungarian situated at the citadel
of Budapest: "Latest Ottoman Governor of Budin Abdurrahman Abdi Paþa
died here in fight on September 2, 1666. He was a heroic enemy!"

Neither Hungarians nor we had an inferiority complex. None of us
devised to ask questions with prejudice or sarcasm. All of us were
regarding these artifacts as "historic heritage."

These are also the signs of what a great and mature nation the
Hungarians are.

Now, take a look at the mentality in our time, a gift that is a
reminder of the Ottoman-French war was presented to French President
Jacques Chirac. That means, viewing history with worn-out prejudices.

Cultural heritage:

Akdamar (Althamar or Akhtamar in Armenian) of course is one of the most
precious historical artifacts of Armenian history. The church is an
indicator of high-level Armenian culture reached in the 10th century.

In her book titled "The Armenians," historian Anne R. Redgate writes
that the Armenian King Gagik brought architects and masters of palaces
in all neighboring civilizations for the church’s construction and
for that reason the architecture of Akdamar Church reminds those of
Byzantium, Sasani, Abbasid and Turkish architecture.

(Page: 214)

Which civilization or culture is 100 percent pure? There are always
inter-cultural exchanges; that is the means for cultural development.

The Armenian Church Akdamar is also a "cultural heritage" of humanity
as much as it is part of the 1,000-year-old Turkish history.

One of the best performances of Culture and Tourism Minister Attila
Koc is his lead in restoration of this historic Armenian structure and
opening it as a museum today. I was so pleased to hear the following
remarks of Koc during our conversation yesterday:

"Hacý Bayram Veli established his mosque right next to a pagan
temple. Such cultural richness in mentalities is needed in our age."

This opening is also a good answer to the chauvinism of the Armenian
diaspora.

–Boundary_(ID_HOqq1AFnhGbV2Av JWlOtlA)–

CCAF Refuses To Take Part In Inauguration Of Akhtamar Church

CCAF REFUSES TO TAKE PART IN INAUGURATION OF AKHTAMAR CHURCH

Armradio.am
29.03.2007 11:00

Co-ordination Council of Armenian Organizations of France (CCAF)
refuses to take part in inauguration of Akhtamar Church.

In a letter addressed on March 26, 2007 to the governor of Van,
chairman of the CCAF, Alexis Govciyan declined the invitation to go
to Van for inauguration of Sourp Khatch. He justifies his refusal
"after an attentive examination" by the fact that the Church of the
Holy Cross "belongs to the Armenian heritage and consequently, is
and must remain the property of the Armenian Patriarchate of Turkey
which notably must be able to celebrate masses there."

Also, Alexis Govciyan points out in his letter, that the change of
the name from Akhtamar to Agdamar, its transformation into a museum
without any reference to its belonging to the cultural heritage
of Armenia, brought CCAF to decline Van’s Governor invitation,
independent correspondent Jean Eckian informs.

Windows XP available in Armenian version

Windows XP available in Armenian version

Arminfo
2007-03-23 20:50:00

Under the auspices of the Armenian representative office of Microsoft
and the Armenian Government, BI LINE company finished the Armenian
localization of the Windows XP popular operation system and presented
it to journalists, Friday.

BI LINE’s President Hayk Khanjyan noted that the first experiment
turned out to be very hard for programmers: not only specialists but
also common ci tizens were involved in the work. "We had to invent new
terms, search for semantic analogues, and revive forgotten words from
Old Armenian," H.Khanjyan said. However, users may come across
questionable terms in the localized version, and the programmers are
ready to take into consideration all the offers of the users. Besides,
the programmers had to invent a new Armenian font – Tahoma Armenian,
as the Sylfaen font used by Microsoft was not suitable for screen
using.

According to Grigor Barseghyan, a Microsoft representative in Armenia,
the system’s translation into national languages contributed to
developing the IT-sphere and raising the social level of society in
various countries. Besides, localization will make computer
technologies available for the Armenian citizens who do not know
foreign languages, and contribute to the spread of computer
technologies in the general education sphere. At the moment, the
Windows – Vista and the Office 2007 package programs are being
localized, and Microsoft provides the programmers with appropriate
instruments for localization.

In his turn, Armen Grigoryan, a representative of the Armenian
Government, said that the executive power emphasizes the importance of
localization and noted that the Government is willing to assist
localization of other programs, too. Microsoft’s programs are the most
popular in Armenia, therefore they were the first to be localized,
Grigoryan noted.

The Armenification program is spread free of charge and it may also be
downloaded. However, only licence software can be localized.
According to G.Barseghyan, only 5% of Armenian users have licence
software.

Exploiting Dead Armenians

EXPLOITING DEAD ARMENIANS

Strategy Page
March 22 2007

March 18, 2007: The US State Department warned the US Congress that
a pending resolution on the "Armenian genocide" issue could harm
US-Turkish relations. Many Armenians claim Ottoman Turkey committed
genocide against Armenians in 1915. The State Department warning had
a definite defense angle: the State Department said that Turkey could
deny the US military use of the vital Incirlik Air Base (in southern
Turkey) if the U.S. pushes the genocide issue. Incirlik is a huge
"NATO base complex." It supports operations in Iraq, Afghanistan,
and throughout Central Asia. Turkey might also deny the US military
overflight privileges. A number of US legislators support the bill,
which is seen as an attempt by the Democrats to undercut the Iraqi
war effort by cutting off Turkish support. .

[parts omitted]
rticles/20070322.aspx

http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/balkans/a

Georgia: Abkhaz Paper Analyses Composition Of New Parliament

GEORGIA: ABKHAZ PAPER ANALYSES COMPOSITION OF NEW PARLIAMENT

Nuzhnaya Gazeta, Sukhumi
20 Mar 07

Text of an article by Rozita German published in the Abkhaz newspaper
Nuzhnaya Gazeta; subheadings as published

The parliament of the fourth convocation has been elected. It
seems that there was no way to avoid legal proceedings, though
according to data available on Monday [19 March], the only complaint
filed with the central electoral commission [CEC] was that of Emma
Gamisonia. According to the preliminary results, Gamisonia was defeated
by Rita Lolua in constituency No 3. CEC head Batal Tabaghua said that
Gamisonia’s complaint concerned "mobile ballot boxes" and added that
it had yet to be reviewed.

Tabaghua was quick to thank the candidates for the respectful attitude
they showed towards each other and said: "There are no complaints
that could influence the results of the pre-election campaign
[as published]."

Voter turnout in the second round of the poll just exceeded 50 per
cent, 3 per cent higher than in the first round. The total number
of registered voters is 128,000. Some R2.3m was spent from the state
budget on organizing the elections while the CEC spent an additional
R200,000 of its own funds.

And they are still there

Only 10 MPs from the previous convocation have retained their
seats in the new parliament. They are: the experienced chair of the
legislation committee, Vladimir Nachach-Ogly, speaker Nugzar Ashuba,
deputy speaker Albert Ovsepyan, Vyacheslav Tsugba, Garri Samanba,
Pavel Leshchuk, Vyacheslav Vardania, Yuriy Kereselidze, Beslan Jopua
and Valeriy Kondakov.

Incumbents Konstantin Ozgan, Beslan Butba, Ilya Gamisonia, Aslan
Bartsits and other of their colleagues "fell out" of the race already
in the first round of voting.

Clearly the "old guard" will try to set the tone in the new parliament.

There is a high probability that Nugzar Ashuba will be re-elected
as parliament speaker. It will be interesting to see who else is
nominated for the post.

Ratio of women to men: 3/32

Television presenter Irina Agrba, who won in the first round, was
joined after the runoff poll by fellow women Rita Lolua and Amra
Agrba. The latter managed to get by former Aytayra [pro-government
movement] member Vadim Smyr in the first round and fend off
pro-government candidate Rauf Tsimtsba in the second. This is perhaps
the most surprising victory given that Amra is younger than any other
member of parliament. Let us recall that in the previous parliament
there were only two women Emma Gamisonia and Marina Bartsits, both
of whom were cast to the side this time. And though the number of
women has increased by one, we can hardly expect the formation of
any kind of women’s lobby because these women are too different –
they come from directly opposing camps.

Ethnic composition

The authorities were quite concerned about the following: "what
will Russia say if there are no Russians in the parliament?" and
"we must not push away the diaspora; we must have representatives
of the diaspora". These issues were not handled very delicately in
behind-the-scenes discussions. At the end of the day we have received
a parliament that both qualitatively and quantitatively has almost
exactly the same ethnic breakdown as the last one. There are three
Russians – Kondakov, Vasilev and Leshchuk; three Armenians – Matosyan,
Mayromyan and Ovsepyan; two Georgians – Kereselidze and Ubiria and
27 Abkhaz.

It will be interesting to see whether the representatives of ethnic
minorities will stand up for the interests of their respective
communities in parliament or whether their presence will again be
nominal, as, with rare exception, they exist only to make up the
numbers during votes.

Breakdown of political affiliation

The pro-government parties United Abkhazia, Amtsakhara and Aytayra
identified the candidates they supported before the elections,
which made it significantly easier to make political forecasts. The
[winning] candidates supported by the government included Amtsakhara
co-chair Vladimir Nachach-Ogly, who, as you will recall, was nominated
in this election by the Communist Party, Irina Agrba, a member of
the political council of the Aytayra movement, Communist Vyacheslav
Tsugba, speaker Nugzar Ashuba, member of the political council of
Amtsakhara Zaur Adleyba as well as Pavel Leshchuk, Garri Samanba,
Lev Shamba, Beslan Jopua, Omar Kvarchia, Soner Gogua, Talikh Khvatysh,
Guram Gumba, Lev Avidzba, Yuriy Zukhba and Vyacheslav Vardania. They
have an absolute majority in parliament.

The opposition lost its spark after the first round. Almost all
opposition candidates lost in the runoff poll. Those who did make it
into parliament were Forum of People’s Unity co-chair Daur Arshba,
former agriculture minister and former vice-presidential candidate
Vitaliy Smyr, head of the Aidgylara political and public movement
Valeriy Kvarchia, former head of Gulripshi and Sukhumi [as published]
Adgur Kharazia, as well as Sergey Matosyan, Rita Lolua and Valeriy
Bganba.

Those who fell to their pro-government opponents in the second round
were: Akhra Bzhania, Vitaliy Gabnia, Almasbey Kchach, Marina Bartsits,
Emma Khojava [also known as Emma Khodzhaa] and the wife of the former
president [Vladislav Ardzinba], Svetlana Jergenia.

It is quite probable that a few MPs may emerge as "dark horses". It
is as yet unknown what group they will join up with. However, we
should expect that Batal Kobakhia, the director of the centre for
humanitarian programmes, will retain his independent status.

Predictions

Thus, there was no victory parade for the opposition. We received
a pro-government parliament, though there are a sufficient number
of opposition leaders there to "throw a spanner in the works". In
the opinion of independent observers, the victory of pro-government
candidates in the parliamentary elections indicates not so much that
the authorities wield great influence in society as that they have
powerful administrative resources at their disposal and, furthermore,
that the people do not trust the opposition.

The opposition’s mistake was that, by nominating practically all
former officials whose "achievements" are remembered and "respected"
by the people, it discredited younger candidates. Additionally,
they are associated in public imagination with the old authorities.

We have received a parliament whose composition is of rather
questionable quality. Many pro-government candidates arrived in
office thanks to protest votes and not all of them measure up as
public servants. After all, we have seen them live on television,
some of them even twice. Similarly, Vladimir Nachach-Ogly will again
have to shoulder all the routine work of parliament.

Therefore, there promises to be some political confrontation in
parliament.

However, given its current breakdown, the opposition will hardly be
able to have any significant influence on parliament’s decisions. We
should not expect parliament to scrutinize the actions of the executive
unless pro-government candidates at some point also seek to do so.

Nonetheless, pundits are predicting that the role of the factions in
the current parliament will grow significantly. MPs will inevitably
split up into groups, as this makes it easier to protect one’s
political interests. Observers are keeping a keen eye on those who
do not belong to any of the factions.

There is practically no longer any hope that someone might form a
third, independent faction.

Now is the time for both pro-government and opposition candidates
to be assigned seats on commissions and committees. They will soon
elect a speaker and two deputy speakers. Afterwards we will see how
easy it will be for the public to gain access to MPs and how they
will inform voters about their work.

Forces Started Propaganda Mission Ahead Of Official Schedule And Wit

FORCES STARTED PROPAGANDA MISSION AHEAD OF OFFICIAL SCHEDULE AND WITH VIOLATIONS
CAN NOT BE GUARANTEE OF FAIR ELECTIONS, CHAIRMAN OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY FINDS

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. The opposition of Armenia must
go at the propaganda stage to a meeting with the people with a
joint group. Aram Sargsian, the Chairman of the Democratic Party
of Armenia (DPA) expressed such an opinion at the March 21 press
conference. In his words, owing to joint visits of the opposition
forces to the marzes of the republic, the people will see that they
will seriously struggle for fair elections. In A. Sargsian’s words,
the people will also understand that though the opposition parties
did not form ideological alliances, however, they are united in the
affair of control of the elections.

The Democratic Party leader mentioned that the "Orinats Yerkir"
(Country of Law) and "Zhorghovrdakan Ughi" (Democratic Path) parties
agreed with the party proposal to found a joint office for control
of elections. A. Sargsian reminded that the "Azgayin Miabanutiun"
(National Unity) party also made such a proposal few days ago.

Touching upon the calls on fair elections made by representatives of
the Republican Party of Armenia and "Bargavach Hayastan" (Prosperous
Armenia) party, A. Sargsian mentioned that he does not imagine how
those forces, started the propaganda mission ahead of the official
schedule and with serious violations (giving of electoral bribe,
gathering of passports), prepare to struggle for justice. In his
words, he will understand the RPA and "Bargavach Hayastan" parties’
readiness to respond the opposition forces’ call to found a joint
control office as an attempt to ruin the affair.