Replacements Used To Be A Sensitive Issue

REPLACEMENTS USED TO BE A SENSITIVE ISSUE

KarabakhOpen
31-01-2008 11:53:04

President Bako Sahakyan has recently signed the law on battling money
laundering and financing terrorism. According to the law, a special
department for tackling money laundering will be set up. Hence,
another structure will emerge in the public administration.

In the upcoming few months new organs will appear. And if the rumors
about likely replacements in the public administration of Karabakh
come true, we will expect more changes.

We have tried to understand the logic of replacements, talked to
different people and asked for what purpose one official is replaced
by another.

Frankly speaking, nobody has given a logical and sensible answer so
far. And at last we heard an opinion which explains a lot.

Our interlocutor said she can see the purpose distinctly. According to
her, after the war the bureaucracy stagnated, and people got used that
it is necessary to give and take bribes, avoid taxes, share illegal
income, and it has become a way of life, a fossilized system. The
new government is now making efforts to stir this bog. "It causes
an unpleasant smell. Without this, however, it is impossible to pull
down the old system and to build a new one," our interlocutor said.

This logic is, in fact, acceptable and grounded. In fact, over ten
years of Arkady Ghukasyan’s presidency there were no shake-ups. The
ex-president was highly cautious, even sensitive about the issue
of appointments. The only event which caused certain changes was
the conflict with the ex-minister of defense Samvel Babayan. During
this conflict officials were dismissed from the administration who
referred to themselves as "freedom fighters". Jirair Poghosyan, the
prime minister, was replaced by Anushavan Danielyan. Almost nothing
had changed after those events. And this led to deep stagnation.

A shake-up is necessary. However, it should not be the only principle
of replacements. If the purpose is to clean up and refresh the
system, the support of the society is necessary. And the society
needs to be explained the purpose of this policy. It is necessary to
demonstrate that the wrongdoers are punished, and honest workers are
encouraged. Unfortunately, this logic is not working.

OSCE Office Helps Clarify Army Conscription Procedures In Armenia

OSCE OFFICE HELPS CLARIFY ARMY CONSCRIPTION PROCEDURES IN ARMENIA

armradio.am
30.01.2008 18:28

An Anti-Corruption Reception Centre, which is supported by the OSCE
Office in Yerevan, hosted a presentation today of the latest legal
and procedural developments relating to military conscription.

The event, organized by the non-governmental organization Soldier’s
Mother, helped inform potential conscripts–11th grade high school
students–about service in the army, military service waivers and
medical procedures, and the danger of corruption. The Centre has been
in operation since April 2007.

"This is the first in the series of awareness raising events planned
by the Anti-Corruption Reception Centre for this year. We hope such
events will further enhance public outreach and will be of help to
our beneficiaries," said Marc Bojanic, Deputy Head of the OSCE Office.

Greta Mirzoyan, chairperson of Soldier’s Mother and an army expert
at the Anti-Corruption Reception Centre, said: "At the Reception
Centre we received around 75 complaints and enquiries related to the
conscription process. That was the reason why we decided to organize
a series of presentations on the relevant procedures and legislation
in the run-up to the spring conscription."

The event featured a contest for participants to demonstrate their
knowledge of the army and conscription-related procedures. Three
winners were awarded prizes.

The OSCE Office in Yerevan supported the establishment of a network
of Anti-Corruption Reception Centres in Yerevan, the Gegharkunik and
Lori provinces. Experts from an anti-corruption coalition of NGOs
provide legal and procedural consultations and assistance to citizens
on corruption-related violations in the army, public education,
healthcare, public services, and on traffic police and drivers’
rights, civil and administrative law.

Academic sentenced over Ataturk

BBC News
Jan 28 2008

Academic sentenced over Ataturk

By Sarah Rainsford
BBC News, Istanbul

A Turkish court has handed down a 15-month suspended jail term to an
academic found guilty of insulting the state’s founder, Mustafa Kemal
Ataturk.

Professor Atilla Yayla said the trial highlighted the limits on free
speech and academic debate in Turkey.

His crime was to suggest in academic discussion that the early
Turkish republic was not as progressive as portrayed in official
books.

His lawyers say they will lodge an immediate appeal.

Professor Yayla told the BBC he was prepared to take his case to the
European Court of Human Rights if necessary.

"I want to emphasise again and again that Turkey’s most pressing
problem is freedom of expression," he said.

Turkey should evolve into being a country where people are not
punished because of their thoughts

Prof Atilla Yayla

The prosecutor had asked the judge to impose a five-year prison
sentence.

This trial has become a test of academic freedom in Turkey, which is
pursuing a long-term ambition to become an EU member.

Mr Yayla had also warned that, as Turkey moved closer to Europe,
Europeans would inevitably question why Turks displayed so many
pictures and statues of Ataturk.

The professor was vilified by parts of the Turkish press, suspended
from work at an Ankara university, and brought to trial.

Mr Yayla, a well-known liberal, denied the charge of insulting
Ataturk and argued that academics must be guaranteed freedom of
expression to pursue their research.

‘Insulting Turkishness’

The Turkish parliament is preparing to debate amending another law
that restricts free speech.

Article 301 on "insulting Turkishness" has been used to prosecute
dozens of writers and intellectuals, including Nobel prize winner
Orhan Pamuk.

"Many foreign observers concentrate on Article 301, but there are
other laws and articles in different laws, which have the potential
to restrict freedom of expression, as it is in my case," Mr Yayla
told the BBC.

"What is important is that Turkey should evolve into being a country
where people are not punished because of their thoughts. And to
achieve this we ought to make reforms in the whole legal system and
also change the mentality in the judiciary. Otherwise Turkey will go
on suffering."

The EU has been pressing for a change to Article 301 for well over a
year, but the government has faced stiff opposition from
nationalists, both within the ruling party and in the opposition.

But changes to the law which protects Ataturk are not up for
discussion.

BAKU: Askerov: "OSCE must recognize Armenia as an aggressor-country"

Today, Azerbaijan
Jan 26 2008

Ziyafet Askerov: "OSCE must recognize Armenia as an aggressor-country"

26 January 2008 [13:26] – Today.Az

The UN and Council of Europe recognize Azerbaijan as a country
subjected to aggression and Armenia as an aggressor country.

Novosti-Azerbaijan reports that the due announcement was made by
Ziyafet Askerov, first vice-speaker of Azerbaijani Milli Medjlis
(Parliament), during the meeting with the delegation of Finnish
Parliament.

The vice speaker stressed that OSCE must recognize Armenian as an
aggressor-country.

"Nagorno-Garabagh conflict will not be settled until the
international community recognizes Azerbaijan as a country, subjected
to occupation and Armenia as an aggressor-country", he noted.

The sides discussed bilateral relations, prospects of further
cooperation and the Garabagh conflict during the meeting.

/Day.Az/

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/42657.html

Cooperation With Such Big Financial Structures As Gazprombank Is One

COOPERATION WITH SUCH BIG FINANCIAL STRUCTURES AS GAZPROMBANK IS ONE OF PRIORITIES OF ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT’S ECONOMIC POLICY

Noyan Tapan
Jan 25, 2008

YEREVAN, JANUARY 25, NOYAN TAPAN. The entrance of Gazprombank,
which has a leading position in the Russian banking system, into the
financial market of Armenia will become a new stimulus for promoting
cooperation of the two countries in the banking and financial sectors,
the Armenian prime minister Serge Sargsian stated when receiving
the delegation headed by the head of Gazrombank OJSC’s management
board Andrey Akimov on January 25. He said that mutually beneficial
cooperation with such a large and influential financial structure
as Gazprombank is one of the priority directions of the Armenian
government’s economic policy. In the words of S. Sargsian, Armenia
strives to make its business environment more and more attractive
for big investors and takes steps aimed at improving the legislative
field. The prime minister underlined that it has been promoted by the
sustainable economic growth and increased invsetments in Armenia’s
economy in recent years.

Considering Gazprombank’s cooperation with Armenia as attractive and
long-term, A. Akimov assured the prime minister that the entrance of
Gazprombank into Armenia will be aimed at developing the banking and
financial system of Armenia as well. He pointed out the existence of
good opportunities for cooperation with Armenia and for investments
in various sectors of the economy, particularly in energy, where
great human potential is available.

NT was informed by the RA Government Information and PR Department
that at the conclusion of the meeting S. Sargsian stated that the
Armenian government is prepared to discuss any proposal and initiative
for development of mutually beneficial cooperation and to assist with
its fulfilment within its jurisdiction.

ANKARA: How About Turkey’s Rosa Parks?

HOW ABOUT TURKEY’S ROSA PARKS?
By Ali H. Aslan

Today’s Zaman
Jan 25 2008
Turkey

When Ambassador Dan Fried, the assistant US secretary of state
for European and Eurasian affairs, was testifying before a House
subcommittee on March 15, 2007, he had said, "We welcome Turkish
leaders and opinion makers’ calls to amend or repeal Article 301."

Would he also publicly side with Turkish leaders and opinion makers
who call for lifting the notorious headscarf ban in Turkey? I strongly
doubt it.

It is good that the US administration feels relatively more
comfortable in criticizing Article 301, which makes it a crime
to insult "Turkishness." Thanks to a broad interpretation by some
ultra-nationalist lawyers and prosecutors, the law has effectively
been used as a tormenting tool against some of the countries finest
minds, including Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk and assassinated
Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink. I’m sure the US government
would be happy if the country it wants to see become a future EU
member leaves behind such laws and practices.

In the meantime, one cannot help but ask whether the US has a clear
position on the decades-old headscarf ban, especially in universities,
which have been turning away some of the country’s finest female
minds. Same nationalist anti-reform circles in civil society and the
state establishment are leading the persecution of these women. Yet we
have not observed a principled approach on the matter from successive
US administrations. True, they always mention the debate in their
annual human rights and religious freedom reports, but they never
take sides.

Let alone criticizing the headscarf ban, throughout my more than
10-year journalistic career in Washington, I have never heard a
US official publicly say the headscarf ban (at least the one at
universities) in Turkey is a "human rights violation." And that
includes those who specialize in human rights and democracy.

The last time I asked this question to a US official was when I
interviewed Fried on July 3, 2006. (I didn’t know back then that
Fried’s notion of democracy promotion in Turkey would not go further
than saying the US doesn’t take sides when the Turkish military issued
a coup threat in April 2007). Fried replied, "I certainly don’t want
to express an opinion about this debate in Turkey, except to say that
this is — like in Turkey as in France — part of a normal debate of
a normal democratic society."

Obviously, this was not Fried’s personal position, because US officials
are under strict guidance on what to say or not to say publicly. One
of the most far-reaching comments I’ve heard on the headscarf problem
from a US official came from Ambassador-at-Large for International
Religious Freedom John Hanford on Sept. 1, 2004.

Hanford spoke of the "controversial" headscarf issue in "certain
countries" of the world, France in particular. He went on to say: "And
we have spoken out on this and said we believe that Muslims, as long
as they have peaceful intentions and are simply acting on the dictates
of their conscience and are not doing so under provocation and are
not provoking others, why shouldn’t they be allowed to wear this? Why
shouldn’t Sikhs be allowed to wear turbans? This is the standard of
religious freedom that we seek to promote around the world."

It was good to hear that. But the US government’s history of talking
about and pursuing that "standard" in Turkey is an embarrassing one.

US policy toward Turkey is mainly formulated by Fried’s office, not
Hanford. Although Fried once depicted the headscarf law in France as
"controversial" (Senate testimony on April 5, 2006), one cannot imagine
him stating that the headscarf ban in Turkey is also "controversial."

The US State Department notes, "Because the promotion of human rights
is an important national interest, the United States seeks to hold
governments accountable to their obligations under universal human
rights norms and international human rights instruments." Do they
honor their principle on the headscarf issue? Not that I know of.

Most people in charge of American policy on Turkey might sincerely
think by using the previous approach they are protecting overall US
national interests. They refrain from intimidating the oppressive
civilian and bureaucratic elite and the social base that the latter
represents. Although these people have lost ground lately to the
ongoing silent revolution of the conservative middle class, they
still enjoy a lot of influence. On the other hand, American rhetoric
on non-Turkish minority rights and restrictive laws like Article 301
also intimidates them. Why, then, do they keep so silent on headscarf
issue? Is it because this is the most emotionally charged domestic
debate in Turkey? Or is there also an Islamophobic element in US
government thinking? I frankly can’t tell.

Not taking sides at times of clear violations of democratic and human
rights principles is actually equivalent to taking sides with the
oppressors. Being indifferent to Turkey’s Rosa Parks incidents is not
only un-American but also detrimental to long-term American interests,
especially if the US is really serious about promoting women’s rights
worldwide and supporting further integration of Muslims with global
society through modern, higher education.

Visit Of The Chairman Of The State Duma Of The Russian Federation To

VISIT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE DUMA OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO ARMENIA

National Assembly of RA
Jan 24 2008
Armenia

On January 28 Mr. Boris Gryzlov, Chairman of the State Duma of the
Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, will arrive in Armenia
on an official visit.

On January 28 meetings are scheduled with Mr. Tigran Torosyan,
President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and
with Mr. Serzh Sargsyan, Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia.

On January 29 the meeting of Mr. Boris Gryzlov, Chairman of the State
Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, with Mr.

Robert Kocharyan, President of the Republic of Armenia is scheduled.

Within the framework of the visit of Mr. Gryzlov, who is also the head
of the Yedinaya Rossiya/United Russia party, inter-party cooperation
agreements are envisaged to be signed with the Republican Party of
Armenia and Prosperous Armenia Party.

The Long Game

THE LONG GAME
By Jo Johnson

FT
January 19 2008 02:00

Viswanathan Anand, the supreme exponent of blitz chess, has made
his first move by the time I join him at our table. Watermelon
juice. Cold. The Indian press has been wall-to-wall "Vishy" since
he won the World Championship last September, but, given the raw
processing power required of his brain, the celebrations have been
mostly teetotal. "I’ll have a glass of wine once in a while," he
says. "Just not before a match. That would not be a good idea because
at my age I don’t have the tolerance of the young Russian boys:
three glasses and they’re still fine the next morning."

An ancient game, chess gets younger every year. For a player of his
age, Anand’s synapses are in remarkable form. His victory at the World
Chess Championship in Mexico pushed his Federation Internationale des
Echecs (FIDE) rating above the 2,800 barrier. It is a feat achieved by
only three other players in the history of the game – Garry Kasparov,
Vladimir Kramnik and Veselin Topalov. "Even if age is not an immense
advantage in chess, to put it mildly, sometimes a bit of experience
is not so bad," he says. "I am surprised at how good my 37th year
has been."

The chef at Cappuccino, a restaurant in the Park Sheraton hotel in
Chennai, Anand’s hometown, is already waiting to take our order,
beaming benevolently at the city’s favourite son. Anand follows his
recommendations: Tuscan fresh tomato soup as a starter, followed by
wholewheat spaghetti with creamy lobster and smoked salmon sauce.

I order the same, as I have so been busy explaining to Anand how my
mobile phone will also be acting as a voice recorder that I haven’t
managed to look at the menu.

The average age of the top 100 chess players in FIDE’s ranking is
just 30.

When Kasparov retired from tournament chess in 2005, at the age
of 41, he gleefully announced to Anand: "I’m out, now you’re the
oldest! You’re the dinosaur now!" Anand says he works hard to
maintain his stamina, exercising in the gym for 90 minutes each
day, to compensate for the physical edge that the 17-year-olds have
on him. His forearms, revealed by a turquoise short-sleeved shirt
blazoned with the logo of his sponsor, NIIT, an Indian IT training
company, are more builder than brainbox.

Even though he now lives most of the year in Spain, Anand has in
a sense brought chess home to India. But it is a different game
to the one born on the subcontinent. If there is a consensus over
the game’s murky origins it is that chess appeared in India around
600AD, moved to Persia 100 years later and then in the ninth century
reached Europe via Arab Spain, where the queen, replacing a docile
male vizier permitted only to move to a diagonal adjacent square,
eventually became the most powerful piece on the board. The old
version of the game is still played in Delhi and Lucknow.

The first "non-Soviet" champion since Bobby Fischer, Anand believes
India now has a chance to excel on the globalised chess battlefield,
suggesting that the country’s success in information technology may
spring from the same genetic code. "Indians generally do very badly in
sport, but they seem to take very naturally to chess," he says. "By
non-Russian standards, India is pretty good." Although India is only
ranked 14th in FIDE’s rating system, many of the countries that are
placed higher depend heavily on Russian emigres.

Anand is trying to reintroduce chess to India, where the passion
for cricket leaves scant resources for other sports. With NIIT,
he has pushed for the introduction of computer-based chess tuition
and competitions in Indian schools, launching the Mind Champions’
Academy, an initiative that has fostered nearly 6,000 clubs with more
than 100,000 student members. The idea is not to hothouse champions
or do heavy-duty coaching, but to help stretch young minds. "Studies
show that chess playing made people do better academically and brought
down juvenile crime," he says.

For a chess prodigy, Anand managed to have a relatively normal
childhood.

His father was general manager of Southern Railway, whose network
covers the states at the tip of the Indian peninsula. At the age
of six, after watching his elder brother and sister playing chess,
he developed an interest in the game. "I went to my mom and said
‘teach me’. She acted as my coach for the next six years." Many of
the great players started even younger, he says, some when they were
just three or four: "If you have a natural aptitude, it shows early."

His infatuation with the game deepened when his family moved to the
Philippines for a year, shortly after the town of Baguio had hosted
the notorious 1978 World Championship clash between Anatoly Karpov, the
defending Soviet champion, and Viktor Korchnoi, who had defected to the
west two years earlier. Newspapers revelled in the cold war mindgames
that saw Korchnoi forced to wear mirror glasses to ward off Karpov’s
hypnotic stares, passionate protests about the flags used on the board,
and histrionics that required the players’ chairs to be X-rayed.

"A normal childhood is important. There’s a point where being fanatical
about chess doesn’t help you become a better player. Going to school
would give me a chance to forget about chess for a while. Children
are very smart and they can easily learn to balance both academics
and chess." By the time he was 16, however, Anand had won the
national championship and was travelling half the year. He pursued a
bachelor’s degree in commerce at Chennai’s elite Loyola College only
as "a fallback". When he graduated, he was India’s first grandmaster
and was ranked ninth in the world.

He developed a reputation as a lightning-fast player but also as
one who was at ease in all the game’s formats: matches against one
opponent, round-robin tournaments and bouts against computers. He
won his first world championship in 2000 – when the title was split
between two rival federations – and again last year, by which time it
had been reunified. Glory may be short-lived. In October he must take
on Vladimir Kramnik, a former world champion who came in second in
Mexico and was granted the right to re-challenge Anand for his title,
to the normally placid Indian’s irritation.

Computers capable of calculating millions of permutations have
closed down areas of the game. Endgames with six or fewer pieces, for
example, now hold little interest to connoisseurs. Breakthroughs are
"difficult", Anand says.

"Five centuries ago people got to name whole countries. Two centuries
ago they could name a district. Now you just get to name a garden." But
the game is far from played out. "It’s alive right now. Revolutionary
stuff can turn up anywhere, often without you realising it. When a
game’s on the line, sometimes you come up with great stuff."

In Mexico, he had "a couple of great ideas", developments on the Moscow
variation of the Semi-Slav Defence, that tilted the game against Levon
Aronian, a strong Armenian player. Anand surprised Aronian with his
17th move of c5. This unexpected ploy locked Aronian’s bishop out of
the game.

Weeks of careful preparation had paid off. "He didn’t have certainty,"
says Anand, who went on to take the game and then the championship. "He
thought I might have made a mistake."

When he returned to India, a country that takes enormous pride in
the success of its diaspora, he was greeted as a hero. Mani Shankar
Aiyar, the country’s maverick sports minister, who has refused to
endorse India’s ambitions to host major international events on the
grounds that they are irrelevant to the common man, hailed Anand’s
victory as an "utterly remarkable achievement… without parallel
or precedent". Yet for all the honours that India has bestowed upon
him over the years, he is sceptical of the euphoria about its new
"superpower" status, describing it as "premature".

"What’s actually changed? Is it India or is it just western perceptions
of India?" he asks. Yet he acknowledges that India’s increasing
integration with the global economy may help him spend more time
here. He and his wife, Aruna, who manages his relations with the
media and the logistics of his life as a roving grandmaster, have just
bought a home in Chennai. He says he will start "gravitating" back to
India. "I moved to Spain because I wanted to work with strong players,"
he says. "Now it’s much easier to work remotely over the internet."

Much of his best preparatory work, however, still takes place in
face-to-face sessions with his longstanding principal second, Peter
Heine Nielsen. The 34-year-old Danish grandmaster, whose FIDE rating
of 2,626 puts him just outside the top 100, plays a role similar to a
golfer’s caddy, Anand says, "keeping track of all the information he
needs to avoid a mistake". They work mainly on computers, with Anand
only using a board just before a game "to get a feel for the pieces"
in intense sessions that last eight or nine hours.

As the flag falls on our lunch, the moment I have been half-dreading
arrives. It would be a dereliction of duty not to offer him a
game. "Full size!" he says in delight, as I produce a folding wooden
set from my bag.

Determined to avoid a humiliating "cheapo", as quick defeats are known,
I play cautiously as the waiters line up to watch. Anand makes his
moves within milliseconds of mine. Within 20 moves, my position is
hopeless and I resign. "Many good moves," he says encouragingly,
as he scribbles down the notation from memory. "Not bad at all for
someone who doesn’t play often."

As the restaurant manager snaps away with his camera, Anand resets the
board, his pieces lining up instantly as mine stumble towards their
appointed positions. After my first game since before the millennium,
I am too relieved I have remembered basic moves to want to risk a
second. For me to level the score against a player of his ranking
would be an event so unlikely that even if I played him twice daily
until the end of time I would be lucky to witness it. We call it a day.

Jo Johnson is the FT’s south Asia bureau chief.

Cappuccino, ITC Park Sheraton & Towers, Chennai

1 x bottled water

2 x Tuscan fresh tomato soup

2 x penne with creamy lobster and smoked salmon

2 x jasmine tea

Total: Rs2,721.48

Nikita mobile licensed for internet services in Armenia

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Jan 18 2008

Nikita mobile licensed for internet services in Armenia

YEREVAN, January 18. /ARKA/. The Public Services Regulatory
Commission (PSRC) licensed today the Nikita Mobile Ltd for internet
services. The company has got a permanent license on data
transmission and internet access in the territory of Yerevan,
according to Hmayak Amiraghyan, head of the PSRC legal department.

Established on October 14, 1991, Nikita is the first Russian game
company and a large provider of computer games. The company’s circle
of activities includes development, launch and support of online
games and services and creation of PC games, as well as localization
of games for Russian Internet users. The company has 10 branches in
the CIS.

Nikita entered Armenia’s market in 2007. The company’s Armenian
branch has implemented various SMS campaigns with the CIS members.
Nikita’s Armenian partners are VivaCell, ArmenTel, as well as the
Cornet-AM Internet Provider. Z. Sh. -0–

Factions of Armenian party clash over control of premises

Haykakan Zhamanak, Armenia
Jan 16 2008

FACTIONS OF ARMENIAN PARTY CLASH OVER CONTROL OF PREMISES

"Fatherly slap – 2"

It was a war situation again at the CRU [Constitutional Right Union]
since yesterday [15 January] morning, which led to CRU leader Hrant
Khachatryan finding himself in a police station. What happened was
that Hayk Babukhanyan [the leader of a rival wing in the CRU] came to
the CRU [headquarters] with his team and accompanied by the police.
Hrant Khachatryan, however, had locked the entrance door. After their
requests to open the door were turned down, the police began to do
their job. Probably suspecting that Hrant Khachatryan’s team would
not be willing to open the door, they had arrived with a toolbox.

After trying hard, the police brought a power saw and finally opened
the door. Before that Hayk Babukhanyan was saying that according to a
court ruling the party has a vice-chairman – him – and although the
ruling is faulty and illegal, they are obeying it and have come to
work in their offices. But because their previous attempt on Saturday
[12 January] failed, yesterday, Babukhanyan’s team came accompanied
by police. "For a year now, this man has taken the party hostage and
we are deprived of using our property. Hrant Khachatryan is using the
party’s budget alone, he has assigned salaries to himself while our
regional offices get no money at all," Babukhanyan kept saying.

[Passage omitted: Babukhanyan’s team finally entered the headquarters
with the help of police]

When Babukhanyan said he was the CRU chairman, Mr. Khachatryan asked
him: "Hayk, who is the chairman of the party?" "I am," was the
answer. "Hayk, I am asking for the last time, who is the chairman of
the party," Hrant Khachatryan repeated his question. "I am, of
course," Babukhanyan answered. This answer was followed by Hrant
Khachatryan’s slap. This is, by the way, the second time Hrant
Khachatryan has slapped Hayk Babukhanyan. Police immediately took
Khachatryan to a police station. Khachatryan was released about two
hours later after giving an explanation. He said he was not charged
with anything.