BAKU: EU Envoy Says Nagornyy Karabakh Conflict Priority – Azeri Pape

EU ENVOY SAYS NAGORNYY KARABAKH CONFLICT PRIORITY – AZERI PAPER

Zerkalo
April 7 2009
Azerbaijan

The Nagornyy Karabakh conflict is a priority area for us, EU special
representative for the South Caucasus Peter Semneby told the media
in Azerbaijan on 6 April, independent daily Zerkalo has reported.

"The EU does not take part in a resolution of the conflict, but
we support the activities of the OSCE Minsk Group and the Nagornyy
Karabakh conflict is a priority for us." Semneby said.

The EU may contribute to security of its neighbours and partners and
we favour the opening of borders in the South Caucasus which is a
precondition for security and development of economic potential in
the region, Semneby was quoted by Zerkalo as saying.

Semneby said that the EU supported the stance of the Venice Commission
of the Council of Europe which states that some of the amendments aimed
to improve the constitution. However, Semneby noted that the removal
of the restriction on the number of presidential terms contradicts
tendencies in modern Europe. Such limits are needed in countries where
democratic institutions are on the development phase, Semneby added.

He described Azerbaijan as an important contributor to stability in
Georgia after the August events.

ANC: "Achievements" Of Serzh Sargsyan’s One Year’s Tenure Are Tenfol

ANC: "ACHIEVEMENTS" OF SERZH SARGSYAN’S ONE YEAR’S TENURE ARE TENFOLD SUFFICIENT FOR HIM TO RESIGN

Noyan Tapan
Apr 9, 2009

YEREVAN, APRIL 9, NOYAN TAPAN. "April 9 is the first anniversary of
the so-called tenure, exotic inauguration of second leader of the
bandit regime established in Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan," the statement
of the Armenian National Congress (ANC) read.

Analysing President Serzh Sargsyan’s one year’s activity, ANC recorded
that by not punishing the organizers of falsifications in the 2008
presidential elections and taking them under his protection S. Sargsyan
proved that he was also one of those creating and ordering the
February 19 electoral falsifications’ "infernal mechanism." Besides,
according to the statement, S. Sargsyan did his best to slur over the
barbaric slaughter of peaceful demonstrants early in the morning of
March 1 in Liberty Square and the bloody slaughter of the spontaneous
peaceful rally participants in the evening the same day. "It is only
by his order that it became possible not to file a criminal case on
the fact of the 10 citizens’ death. By doing so he proved that he was
not only aware, but was at least a co-author in organization of that
state and national disgrace," the ANC statement read.

According to ANC, at present S. Sargsyan continues keeping as hostages
55 political prisoners not being afraid of discrediting country’s
judicial system till the end for that purpose, inducing dozens
of judges, prosecutors, investigators, and policemen to criminal
actions. It was mentioned that it was by S. Sargsyan’s order that
law enforcement bodies prosecuted, chased, and terrified dozens of
thousands of citizens.

"State’s monopolization has risen to a new level," ANC recorded
adding that in addition to it, thousands of medium-sized and small
businessmen have reached the verge of economic disaster. The statement
authors emphasize that unprecedented fall in prices is recorded in the
whole world, while we have growth in prices in Armenia. "Understanding
very well that its illegal and criminal power is doomed, S. Sargsyan’s
administration has selflessly devoted itself to robbery and pillage,"
the statement read.

According to radical opposition’s estimation, in the sphere of foreign
policy, Armenia’s President for retaining his own power for one more
day has put to auction country’s national interests. ANC announced that
the Nagorno Karabakh problem was led to a state when S. Sargsyan either
has to sign under the most unfavorable of the possible settlement
variants or to involve the country in a war. "The issue of Genocide has
been also put to auction: agreeing to Turkey’s proposal to establish
a commission of historians on that issue, S. Sargsyan in essence also
called in question the fact of the genocide," ANC mentioned.

Summing up the one year of S. Sargsyan’s tenure, ANC considers that
his "achievements" in both domestic and foreign sphere are tenfold
sufficient for him to resign.

A1+’s Journalist Was Beaten Up

A1+’S JOURNALIST WAS BEATEN UP

A1+
08:33 pm | April 08, 2009

Society

A1+’s journalist David Jalalyan was been beaten up by the Chief of
the Patrol Division, Robert Melkonyan (nicknamed "Bazaz") in Northern
Avenue minutes ago.

David was attacked the moment he was trying to shoot policemen pushing
and beating the participants of political walks.

Robert Melkonyan hit David on the face and in the stomach. Some other
policemen joined in the beating shortly afterwards.

Afetr rendering first aid an ambulance car took David Jalalyan to
hospital from A1+’s editorial office.

A1+’s President Mesrop Movsesyan says he will be consistent and will
get his way through justice: all criminals will be punished.

Fire At The "Nairit" Storage

FIRE AT THE "NAIRIT" STORAGE

A1+
11:52 am | April 07, 2009

Society

On April 6 at 4:27 p.m. a fire broke out at the equipment storage
room of "Nairit" CJSC.

A firefighting crew left for the scene and everybody helped put out
the fire. Fuel was outflown and burnt during a gas-fill.

Wires burnt

On the same day at 1:21 p.m. a fire broke out in the Norabats village
of Ararat Marz. A firefighting crew left for the scene and the fire
was put out with the help of people nearby. The fire left electric
wires on the roof of V. Manukyan’s house burnt.

Thickets burnt

On the same day we received information from the Tavush Marz that a
fire broke out at the "Shachmalu" fields of Ijevan. A firefighting
crew left for the scene and the fire was put out at 7:30 p.m.

The fire left thickets and brushes of 8,000 square meters burnt.

The Harshness And Sharpness Of Obama’s Speech Was Unexpected

THE HARSHNESS AND SHARPNESS OF OBAMA’S SPEECH WAS UNEXPECTED
Anna Nazaryan

"Radiolur"
07.04.2009 15:29

Yesterday’s speech of President Obama on the Armenian Issue was harsh
and sharp, and it was unexpected, Suren Manukyan, Deputy Director of
the Armenian Genocide Museum Institute, told a pres conference today.

Suren Manukyan considers that the hints Turkey drops about the signing
of an agreement on the establishment of Armenian-Turkish relations,
opening of the border and creation of a joint commission come to
substitute Barack Obama’s pledge to recognize the Armenian Genocide.

"I think we will gain nothing from that agreement, while it will give
much to Turkey, because in 15 years those in Turkey will probably
understand the ineffectiveness of today’s policy, i.e. they will
understand that the closed border has not solved the issue it was
supposed to solve: Armenia has not been destroyed."

Turkologist Ruben Safrastyan considers that the process of recognition
of the Armenian Genocide yields to the processes of opening of the
border and establishment of Armenian Turkish relations.

"Recently Turks have been pushing forward the question of opening
of the border and, thereby solving a very important issue, i.e. the
official refusal from territorial claims. If we recognize the Kars
Agreement, we thus refuse from any territorial claims, while in case
of recognition of the Armenian Genocide some threat will still continue
bothering the Turkish state and authorities," Safrastyan said.

Delegation Of The European Parliament To Arrive In Armenia On April

DELEGATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT TO ARRIVE IN ARMENIA ON APRIL 6

National Assembly of RA
April 6 2009
Armenia

On April 6 the delegation of the members of the European Parliament
will arrive in Yerevan on April 6 to take part at the 10th meeting of
Armenia-European Union (EU) Parliamentary Cooperation Committee headed
by Armenia-EU Parliamentary Cooperation Committee Co-Chairperson Mrs
Marie Anne Isler Beguin.

On April 6 the delegation will meet the Head of the delegation of the
European Commission to the Republic of Armenia Mr Raul de Luzenberger
and Ambassadors of EU countries, Chairman of the Committee on State
and Legal Affairs of the National Assembly of Armenia, Head of the
delegation of the National Assembly in the Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe (PACE) Mr Davit Harutyunyan, Chief of the
Police of the Republic Armenia Mr Alik Sargsyan, Minister of Justice Mr
Gevorg Danielyan, will visit Kentron and Vardashen criminal-executive
institutions.

On April 7 the delegation will have meetings with the representatives
of NGOs and media, Head of OSCE Office in Yerevan Mr Sergey Kapinos.

On the same day the 10th meeting of Armenia-EU Parliamentary
Cooperation Committee will be held, where the Speaker of the National
Assembly Mr Hovik Abrahamyan will give welcoming speech.

On April 8 the 10th meeting of Armenia-EU Parliamentary Cooperation
Committee will resume. The Speaker of the National Assembly Mr Hovik
Abrahamyan will meet the Committee Co-Chairpersons Mr Avet Adonts
and Mrs Marie Anne Isler Beguin.

The works of the 10th meeting of Armenia-EU Parliamentary Cooperation
Committee will be summed up with press conference.

The President of the Republic of Armenia Mr Serzh Sargsyan will
receive the delegation.

On April 9 the members of the delegation of the European Parliament
will lay a wreath to the memory of the Genocide victims at the
memorial complex of Genocide victims and will visit the Armenian
Genocide Museum.

On the same day the delegation of the European Parliament will leave
Yerevan.

Other Voices: It Is A Moral Imperative For The World To Halt Genocid

OTHER VOICES: IT IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE FOR THE WORLD TO HALT GENOCIDES
Henry Brysk

MLive.com
arbor/index.ssf/2009/04/other_voices_it_is_a_moral _imp.html
April 7 2009
Michigan

After the Nuremberg trials exposed the enormity of the Holocaust, the
cry arose, "Never again!" In a United Nations convention, genocide was
declared an international crime and defined as encompassing a broad
range of atrocities of which the Holocaust was the ultimate example.

Since then, there have been many outbreaks of genocide, some with
millions of victims. As with the Nazi Holocaust, the world paid
no attention until the killing was well under way. In Rwanda,
a holocaust was achieved in a remarkably short time without
German technological efficiency. The U.N. never took effective
action to stop a genocide. Instead, it elected the Sudanese regime,
responsible for the highest genocidal death toll, to its Human Rights
Commission. Where a genocide was interrupted, that was due to either
ultimately successful military reaction by the targeted group or
to invasion from a neighbor; the only significant intervention from
farther away came from NATO after the breakup of Yugoslavia.

It is particularly disturbing that many genocides (including the
bloodiest) never penetrated the global consciousness. How did all
the good intentions fail?

Part of the problem is the interaction of a well-meaning,
all-encompassing definition with lack of an enforcement policy and
with weakness of will. The Nazi Holocaust was the ultimate genocide,
aimed at the "final solution" of killing all Jews, with emphasis
on children so that there would be no future generations. The
U.N. convention specifies "with intent to destroy, in whole or in
part." The term "ethnic cleansing" attained currency during the
breakup of Yugoslavia to describe the systematic harassment of an
ethnic group into leaving a particular territory.

It is in the nature of such violence, if unimpeded, to escalate into
episodes of mass murder and rape, as in Bosnia and Darfur. The Nazis
started with ethnic cleansing of Jews out of Germany and went step
by step all the way. The campaign by the Chinese to eliminate Tibetan
identity by mass immigration has been dubbed cultural genocide. There
is considerable disparity among the cases, and the required response
is graduated; this has been an excuse for endless debate instead of
action. Conversely, not all mass murder is genocide; there was no
ethnic distinction between perpetrators and victims in Cambodia.

Holocaust denial is fading (except in some parts of the Middle
East). It has never had any credibility, in view of the enormous
physical evidence (witnesses, mass graves, crematoria), reinforced by
the German bureaucratic compulsiveness about record-keeping. (Such
denial can be persistent; nearly a century later, the Turks refuse
to admit to the Armenian genocide.) It is a mistake to lump the
deniers with believers in alien abductions. They are either neo-Nazis
seeking paranoid recruits or Arab terrorists who aspire to repeat
the Holocaust.

The more sophisticated successor to Holocaust denial is trivialization,
calling any alleged mistreatment a Holocaust (or genocide). This
passes as rhetorical excess, but it is more insidious: The constant
misuse of the term desensitizes the listener, often the deliberate
intent. It can thus serve to disarm the resolve to react to the real
atrocities committed by the complainant.

A related syndrome is "moral equivalency," the doctrine that the
purity of the victim must be examined before one deigns to intervene
(e.g. discourse about the socioeconomic interaction between farmers
and nomads as a root cause in Darfur). Although the tone of Holocaust
trivialization is raucous while moral equivalency is expressed
sanctimoniously, both lead to ethical failure. They both provide
rationalizations for avoiding action.

A more recent phenomenon has been the emergence of fanatics with
genocidal ambitions beyond their present capabilities who commit
episodic indiscriminate murders. The limited scope of each individual
atrocity has led the clueless to call for "proportionate response." A
week after 9/11, a full-page ad in The Ann Arbor News opposed military
action in Afghanistan. Hair splitters have found it acceptable to bomb
the caves of al-Qaida but not the tunnels of Hamas. Smallish mass
murders (suicide bombing of weddings and funerals, rockets fired at
kindergartens) are deemed to entitle the victims only to retaliate on
the same scale (how?). In other words, the terrorists are led to expect
that the punishment will be at a level that is acceptable to them,
so they can keep on killing. Incidentally, genocide in installments
is still genocide.

The massacres were not halted in time in the Nazi Holocaust and in
the succeeding genocides. There is a crucial need for moral clarity:
Genocidal mass murder is the ultimate crime against humanity and
its perpetrators are evil. It is a moral imperative to stop them and
to bring them to justice, and this can only be accomplished by the
prompt exertion of sufficient force.

I should be my brother’s keeper. Powers that are militarily capable of
stopping the killing and fall short are guilty of passive complicity
(or worse); ineffective gestures (U.N. resolutions, economic sanctions,
"dialogue") amount to a hypocritical failure of will. The sophistry
of moral equivalency is verbal fiddling while Darfur burns.

Mass murder is simply never an acceptable form of conflict
resolution. Laundering its perpetrators as "militants" is an abdication
of journalistic ethics. The alleged grievances of the killers and the
sins of their targets have no bearing on the need to act promptly;
you may choose to study these matters at leisure, but only after the
bloodshed has been halted. Psychoanalysis takes years; murder does not.

Henry Brysk is retired in Ann Arbor since 2001 (two previous periods
of living and working here add up to a decade). A Holocaust survivor,
he has long pondered why the world repeatedly fails to deter genocides.

http://www.mlive.com/opinion/ann-

Obama, Turkey And Armenia

OBAMA, TURKEY AND ARMENIA
By Ara Khachatourian

cle=41189_4/6/2009_1
Monday, April 6, 2009

"Well, my views are on the record and I have not changed those views,"
President Obama told a joint news conference with Turkish President
Abdullah Gul. "I want to focus not on my views right now, but on the
views of the Turkish and Armenian people. If they can move forward
and deal with a difficult and tragic history, then I think the entire
world should encourage that."

Obama made the same point when he addressed the Turkish parliament
later in the day. "I know there are strong views in this chamber
about the terrible events of 1915, and while there has been a good
deal of commentary about my views, it is really about how the Turkish
and Armenian people deal with the past," he said. "And the best way
forward for the Turkish and Armenian people is a process that works
through the past in a way that is honest, open, and constructive."

While unprecedented for a recent American president to go to Turkey
and reaffirm his views on the Armenian Genocide, stopping short
of using the "G" word, it is also important to hold the president
to task and continue to urge him to honor his campaign promise of
properly recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

The problematic parts of Obama’s debut in Turkey are:

In asking Turkey to deal with its history, he placed the same onus
on Armenians–the acknowledged victims of the Genocide, which Turkey
still continues to deny;

Encouraging Turkey to play a more central role in the resolution
the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. It was Turkey that closed its borders
with Armenia citing the Karabakh conflict and by doing so becoming
a de-facto party to the conflict. Obama’s expectation that Turkey
should play a pivotal role would hinder any progress made during the
conflict resolution process.

At the end of the day, Obama’s message was that normalization of
Turkish-Armenian relations must move forward.

On that front, this so-called deal to open the borders has hit a
couple of snags.

Azeri President Ilham Aliyev announced that he would not go to Istanbul
for the UN Summit of Civilizations in protest over Turkey’s efforts
to open its border with Armenia. Despite phone calls from Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton and Gul urging him to change his mind,
Aliyev stuck to his guns and will not travel to Turkey.

On Sunday, Armenia’s foreign minister Eduard Nalbandian made one of
the more decisive statements on the border opening firmly saying that
there should be no preconditions to the process.

This came in response to an announcement Friday by Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan who said the without a Karabakh
resolution there would be no border opening. This, coupled with
the continued push by Turkey to establish a historical commission to
address the Genocide issue prompted Nalbandian to assert: "It has been
said many times and I wish to stress again that the establishment of
Armenian-Turkish relations can not put into question the veracity of
the Armenian Genocide."

Were last week’s media reports touting an imminent deal on the border
opening premature? It is clear that there are many fundamental problems
in advancing Obama’s wish to further Turkish-Armenian dialogue.

In recent weeks, there has been significant discussion in Armenia about
this matter, all of which have focused on the Turkish perspective. Not
a day has gone by without an "expert" or "political scientist"
in Armenia discussing this issue. But none of them has opined or
presented a concrete perspective on how Armenia will benefit from
this border opening scheme.

Agreements signed hastily to fulfill one or another party’s desires
often lead to severe challenges in the future and can weigh down
several generations in the process.

Armenia is surrounded by hostile countries–it always has been. In
this effort to normalize relations, the Armenian government should
be cognizant that making huge concessions will push Armenia into a
corner and diminish any upper hand it may have in the region.

www.asbarez.com/index.html?showarti

Turkey’s condition for accepting Rasmussen

Turkey’s condition for accepting Rasmussen

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan  

press tv
Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:00:23 GMT

The Turkish Premier says his country accepted his Danish counterpart
as the NATO head after the US vowed to address Ankara’s reservations.

"We explained our reservations on (Danish Prime minister) Dane Anders
Fogh Rasmussen to (US President Barack) Obama and he gave us
guarantees on our reservations. Then our president accepted
Rasmussen’s candidacy," Recep Tayyip Erdogan said.

Turkey had earlier threatened to veto Rasmussen over his poor handling
of a 2006 crisis over cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad in a Danish
newspaper.

Erdogan said that Turkey dropped its abjections against Rasmussen
after US President Barack Obama offered promises that one of
Rasmussen’s deputies would be a Turk, Reuters reported on Saturday.

"One of the issues is to have a Turk as one of his (Rasmussen)
deputies and to have our commanders in NATO command," Erdogan told
reporters in Ankara.

Obama had also given Turkey guarantees that Turkish commanders would
be present at the alliance’s command, Erdogan said.

NATO leaders agreed unanimously on Saturday to appoint the Danish
prime minister as the next head of the alliance after Turkey dropped
its objections.

A family’s reprieve from fear

Las Vegas Sun
April 4 2009

A family’s reprieve from fear

Mother who’s seeking legal status freed from jail, but still could be deported

By Timothy Pratt
Sat, Apr 4, 2009 (2 a.m.)

When Emma Sarkisian heard her mother’s voice tight with panic in a
call from the North Las Vegas jail last week, she flashed back to her
own calls from a different jail four years ago.

She too was told to pack her bags, along with her younger sister,
Mariam, apparently to board a plane for Armenia, a country that didn’t
even exist when Emma was born in 1986. She also called her family in
fear. In the end, both sisters were saved from deportation by a highly
unusual, last-minute phone call from Sen. Harry Reid to the secretary
of Homeland Security.

But Emma hadn’t heard of any such drama this time; her mother, Anoush,
was on the other end of the line saying she was being taken
somewhere. Could it be a waiting plane?

Within a couple of hours, the two were wetting each other’s cheeks
with tears of relief, locked in embrace on the sidewalk in front of
the Las Vegas Immigration and Customs Enforcement office.

After the mother of five had spent nearly two months in jail,
including being chained to a hospital bed for four days, the federal
government set her free March 26 under an `order of supervision,’
according to her attorney, Arsen V. Baziyants.

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokeswoman would not comment
on the case, other than to say that Anoush, like Emma and Mariam, must
report for regularly scheduled visits to Las Vegas immigration
officials ‘ and that the agency would continue to seek to deport the
woman, who lacks travel documents.

The events again draw the Sarkisian family into the news, offering an
example of the situation facing an estimated 2 million families in the
United States.

Some members of those families were born here ‘ as were three of the
Sarkisian sisters, Patricia, 15; Elizabeth, 16; and Michelle,
17. Others become citizens over time, as did Rouben Sarkisian, the
father of the girls, divorced from Anoush since 1999 but still in
contact with his daughters. Some remain in limbo, such as Emma, now
22, and her sister Mariam, 21, who wait while Rouben’s application for
their citizenship winds its way through the system. Still others find
no legal recourse; the only thing keeping them from being deported is
that the federal government can’t find them.

With an increased emphasis on enforcement, both at workplaces and in
neighborhoods, more of those people, like Anoush Sarkisian, are being
found and deported. As a result, more families are split apart.

Those who advocate fixing the immigration system by offering pathways
to legalization for millions, along with increased border security,
are increasingly pointing to the effect of deportations on millions of
U.S.-born children. They say communities across the United States are
better served by keeping families together.

Federal officials got to the Sarkisian family this time after
discovering that Anoush was giving a deposition in an auto accident
lawsuit. On Feb. 2, outside a law office, several Immigration and
Customs Enforcement agents ordered Sarkisian out of her car and into
handcuffs, in front of Emma, who looked on, stunned.

Emma and Mariam had been detained in a similar fashion four years
earlier, teenage workers in their father’s suburban strip mall
pizzeria suddenly catapulted into the glare of national media
attention.

Their story began years earlier, however. Rouben Sarkisian had come to
the United States with Anoush in the early 1990s. They had three
daughters together. He divorced Anoush and remarried a U.S. citizen,
entering a path to citizenship. Anoush sought political asylum from
the U.S. government, a case that took nearly six years, finishing with
her losing an appeal. The government ordered her deported in 1999. She
stayed, unwilling to leave her daughters.

Rouben shared the job of raising them. He thought the girls were due
to become citizens, but ICE agents arrested them in January 2005 and
sent them to a cell in Los Angeles.

After several weeks of dramatic back-and-forth, Reid’s call to the
homeland security chief saved them. The federal government exercised
its discretion to offer what’s known as humanitarian relief. Rouben
has finally become a U.S. citizen and petitioned for his older
daughters to do the same. But that will take years, and until then,
the daughters can’t petition for their mother. Neither can Rouben,
because they are divorced.

The eldest of the U.S.-born daughters, Michelle, could petition for
Anoush to become a citizen, but only after she turns 21 ‘ in four
years.

Baziyants, Anoush’s attorney, is hoping to obtain legal status for her
under an immigration law meant in part for people from former Soviet
republics. He says attorneys incorrectly advised her more than a
decade ago that she wasn’t eligible for help under this law.

For now, he says, the government made the correct decision releasing
Anoush from jail, where she received inadequate medical attention for
her diabetes, migraines and stomach disorders. A week before she was
released, detention center officials took her to North Vista Hospital,
where she remained chained to a bed for four days, refusing to sign
papers consenting to an operation on her heart, he says. During that
time, neither he or the family could obtain information regarding her
whereabouts. Sarkisian’s stay also included repeated attempts, some at
3 a.m., to make her sign papers giving the Armenian government
permission to grant her travel documents, the attorney says.

Baziyants adds that the Senate majority leader’s office also helped
obtain Anoush’s release. A spokesman for Reid wouldn’t comment on the
case, however.

People following the story of the Sarkisians have said the federal
government should deport Anoush just as all orders of deportation
should be acted on.

But Baziyants says the case is not cut and dry, and neither are many
others. `The point isn’t whether we should open the floodgates and let
everyone into the country,’ he said. `The point is, are the rules as
they are now really balanced? Do they reflect who we are as a country?
Do we tear apart all these families, or take a closer look?’

Meanwhile, last Friday night at the Sarkisian house in Las Vegas,
everyone ate kashlama for the first time in nearly two months; Anoush
is the only one in the family who can prepare the Armenian
meat-and-potatoes dish.

Michelle, a senior at Palo Verde High, was relieved. While her mother
was gone, she didn’t sleep well and let her grades slip to C’s.

`There was so much stress,’ she says. `The house was a depressing
place. Now I can rest.’

4/familys-reprieve-fear/

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/apr/0