ANKARA: Turkish PM Says Hopeful Over Meeting With Armenian President

TURKISH PM SAYS HOPEFUL OVER MEETING WITH ARMENIAN PRESIDENT IN DAVOS

Jan 29 2009
Turkey

The Turkish prime minister will meet the Armenian president in Davos,
Switzerland on Thursday.

Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will have a meeting with
Armenian President Serzh Sargsian on Thursday evening on the sidelines
of the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos.

"I am hopeful but I do not know how hopeful Armenian side is,"
Erdogan told reporters.

Erdogan also expressed wish that they could make progress.

Prime Minister Erdogan also had a dinner with Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev.

Turkey’s President Abdullah Gul paid one-day visit to Armenia on
September 6, 2008 to watch a World Cup qualifier between the two
countries.

Gul had a meeting with Sargsian, and later the two presidents watched
the soccer game together. Gul later returned to Turkey.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan and his Armenian counterpart
Eduard Nalbandian met for a number of times in 2008. Babacan visited
Armenia in September 2008 to watch the World Cup qualifier.

Also, Babacan, Nalbandian and Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov had a trilateral meeting in New York in September 2008
on the sidelines of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly.

Nalbandian came to Istanbul in November to visit the Black Sea
Economic Cooperation (BSEC) Secretariat in Istanbul after he took
over the rotating presidency of BSEC earlier in the year.

www.worldbulletin.net

Kofi Annan Praises Turkey’s Courtesy In Caucasus

KOFI ANNAN PRAISES TURKEY’S COURTESY IN CAUCASUS

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.01.2009 18:45 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan praised
Turkey’s position on Caucasus and Near East.

"As UN Secretary-General I have numerously praised Turkey’s efforts for
resolution of the Cypriot problem and the Nagorno Karabakh conflict,"
Mr. Annan told reporters in Davos.

"I believe that Turkey will cope with the tasks it has undertaken as
a UN non-permanent member," he added, 1news.az reports.

Who Is Blackmailed By Baku – Yerevan Or Ankara?

WHO IS BLACKMAILED BY BAKU – YEREVAN OR ANKARA?

ArmInfo
2009-01-28 13:11:00

ArmInfo. ‘Official Baku considers that unless the Nagorno- Karabakh
conflict is resolved, implementation of no platform paving the way for
cooperation with Armenia is possible’, deputy foreign minister Araz
Azimov in a meeting on Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform
in Istanbul, AzerTaj reports . Azimov noted generally his country
supports the platform, and described the fact that five participating
countries are interested in establishing security in the region as
very important for realization of the platform. Azimov stressed that
realizing a platform calling for cooperation is impossible unless
conflicts are settled. "At the same time we consider discussions to
be held within the platform as useful", he added.

On one hand, Baku participates in the conference on the Platform
and supports the idea of its creation, on the other hand, it makes
attempts of blackmail. It is yet not so clear who is blackmailed by
Baku taking into account the circumstance that just Turkey is the
most interested party in promoting the idea of the Platform.

Armenia’s GDP Amounts To 11.9bn Dollars In 2008

ARMENIA’S GDP AMOUNTS TO 11.9BN DOLLARS IN 2008

Mediamax
Jan 21 2009
Armenia

Yerevan, 20 January: The growth in Armenia’s GDP amounted to 6.8 per
cent in 2008 compared to 2007.

The GDP volume totalled 3,650bn drams (11.9bn dollars) in 2008,
the press service of the National Statistics Service of Armenia told
Mediamax today.

The volume of industrial output in the republic stood at 751.25bn drams
(2.45bn dollars) in 2008, which is 2 per cent more than in 2007.

The Brief But Full Two Years

THE BRIEF BUT FULL TWO YEARS

Aztag Daily
Jan 20 2009
Lebanon

Only two years have passed from the murder of chief editor of
"Agos" and we can say that the Armenian issues has lived hectic
developments. Avoiding overestimations, we can even discuss the
impacts that Dink’s life, ideology and martyrdom have had on Turkey’s
public opinion.

There is the need to record the changes that have taken place after
Hrant Dink’s murder both on Turkey’s internal platform and with respect
to the Armenian issues in general. Surely, it would be politically
naïve or simplistic to relate the process or the development of the
changes to one person. That’s not what is being said here anyhow.

Overlooking the Armenian factor in Dink’s life, let’s also consider
for a moment that Dink was a fervent activist in the Turkish leftist
spheres, a uniting element and a Turkish citizen who fought against
the Turkish surveying system in Turkish internal issues. And the
whole art, the uniqueness of that struggle was the closeness of the
ideological pivots of the issues pursued by the Turkish citizen of
Armenian descent, his effective approach to find common grounds as
well as his courage to unleash piercing attacks against the deep state
through articles and press conferences. After all article 301 was not
disturbing to Armenians alone. It had become a priority for Kurds,
Greeks, Alawis, Syriacs and a remarkable sphere of the Turkish public
opinion to overthrow it.

Two years is a short period of time to perform a general assessment
of the impact that Dink’s ideas had over political processes. The
phenomenon of dragging intellectuals to courts under article 301,
the activation of the dormant Turkish dissident movement, the bold
rhetoric, and the screaming evidence of the wide respect towards
Dink and his influence on the Turkish public opinion as well as the
pardon campaigns in spite of outbursts from nationalist and racist
groups, make one surely think that within the two years that passed
a starting point has been established, a trigger has certainly went
off to produce the sequential chain reaction of events.

However, it seems that Dink’s phenomenon has had a greater
impact on Turkish internal stage than it has on intra-state
relationships. Different motives, different stimuli have had an impact
on Armenian-Turkish official relationships, which has not given birth
to any basic novelty or change in the political field. After weeks or
years of Dink’s death the situation is basically the same. Only three
weeks after Dink’s death Vartan Osganian, the Armenian foreign minister
at the time, wrote the following lines in "The Los Angeles Times":
"Three weeks after the murder of well known journalist Hrant Dink, it
seems that the Turkish authorities have grasped neither the address of
his life nor the message of his death. Immediately after Dink’s death
we, in Armenia, as well as many around the world wanted to believe
that the outburst of the popular grief would create a crack in the
walls of Turkish denial and refusal and that efforts would be put into
action to gradually eliminate the conditions that made the killing
possible. We were all hopeful that the gravity of that crime and the
depth of its repercussions would force the Turkish leaders to grab
the opportunity and radically change the policy that lead to today’s
stalemate. Nevertheless, after the first glimpses of solidarity,
the message being received from Ankara is already changed. Erdogan,
the Turkish prime minister, has announced that any enhancement of
relationships with the Armenian side is not possible since they,
like in the past, are insisting on the necessity of the Genocide
talk. That is a history changing event that shouldn’t and can’t be
forgotten. Nevertheless we are also for the enhancement of ties. One
is not a precondition for the other".

It’s obvious that the responsibility of the stalemate created in the
relationships falls on the Turkish state, who has adopted an absolutely
preconditional stance. Stripping Turkey of those precondition was
Dink’s struggle as well. Till this day the explicit and deep states
of Turkey are on the zero mark in that respect. The change has swept
the Turkish population, however, where certain elements have become
bolder in their demands to overthrow article 301, to recognize the
Armenian Genocide, to respect the minority rights and to ask pardon
from the Armenians. It is the intensity of this struggle that will
eventually also influence the intra-state relationships.

No one can deny that the martyred chief editor of "Agos" has had a
founding role in the development of the public opinion as well as
the bursting of the boldness on Turkey’s internal stage. That is a
dangerous fight fought on the inside of the castle walls where the
troop commander gave his utmost two years ago.

Two years is a short period of time. However, the spotlights shed on
the developments of Turkey’s internal stage can convince us that in
spite of being brief, nevertheless, those two years have really been
two remarkably full ones.

–Boundary_(ID_114tpGiY2g7TIRl8LLmadg)–

Henceforth Social Workers’ Day To Be Marked On November 4 In Armenia

HENCEFORTH SOCIAL WORKERS’ DAY TO BE MARKED ON NOVEMBER 4 IN ARMENIA

Noyan Tapan

Jan 23, 2009

YEREVAN, JANUARY 23, NOYAN TAPAN. Henceforth Social Workers’ Day will
be marked on November 4 every year in Armenia. The Armenian Prime
Minister Tigran Sargsyan approved the decision on it at the January
22 sitting of the government.

According to the Minister of Labor and Social Issues Arsen
Hambartsumian, there are about 4,000 social workers in the state
sector of the country.

http://www.nt.am?shownews=1011534

EU Commissioner: European Union Condemns The Militant Rhetoric In Na

EU COMMISSIONER: EUROPEAN UNION CONDEMNS THE MILITANT RHETORIC IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH PEACE PROCESS

ArmInfo
2009-01-19 19:23:00

ArmInfo. During Jan 19 press-conference in Yerevan, EU Commissioner
for External Affairs and European Neighborhood Policy Benita
Ferrero-Waldner said that European Union and she herself are interested
in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and would be glad
if the parties could find the solution to this problem.

Benita Ferrero-Waldner expressed hope that the presidents of
Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet in the near future and added that
the meetings of the two countries’ presidents in Moscow and foreign
ministers in Helsinki created a positive impulse. The settlement of
this conflict is important for the whole South Caucasus region. There
are such principles as the people’s right to self-determination and
territorial integrity, and the compromising variant is between these
two principles, she said and stressed that EU condemns the militant
rhetoric in the Karabakh peace process and is willing to contribute
to the conflict settlement in every possible way.

For his part, Nalbandyan stressed that Armenia intends to continue
the peace process within the frames of the OSCE Minsk Group and on
the basis of earlier adopted documents, particularly, the Madrid
principles.

Armenian Side Refutes

ARMENIAN SIDE REFUTES

A1+
[07:30 pm] 19 January, 2009

According to Azerbaijan’s Defence Ministry, on January 18-19 Armenian
armed forces periodically opened fire at the subdivisions of Azeri
armed forces near the town of Berd.

The ministry also says that they opened return fire on the Armenian
side. The exchange of fire stopped shortly afterwards. There are no
victims, notes the Azeri Defence Ministry.

Spokesman for the RA Defence Ministry Seyran Shahsuvaryan refutes
the information and says it does not correspond to the facts. Seyran
Shahsuvaryan also says no fire was opened on the Armenia-Azerbaijan
frontier on January 18-19.

EU Condemns Bellicose Statements On Karabakh Conflict Resolution

EU CONDEMNS BELLICOSE STATEMENTS ON KARABAKH CONFLICT RESOLUTION

PanARMENIAN.Net
19.01.2009 19:16 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The EU is interested in resolution of the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict, a European Commissioner said.

"We will welcome any agreement between the Presidents of Armenia and
Azerbaijan," Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Commissioner responsible for
External Relations and European Neighborhood Policy, said during a
joint news conference with Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian
in Yerevan today.

"We believe that the sides should find a compromise solution, in accord
with the principle of territorial integrity and the right of nations
to self-determination. The EU is ready to assist the peace process,"
she said, adding that the European Union condemns bellicose statements
on the conflict resolution.

For his part, Minister Nalbandian said that Armenia is willing to
continue talks on the basis of Madrid principles and the outcomes of
Moscow and Helsinki talks.

English School parents fight back

English School parents fight back
By Elias Hazou

18 Jan 2009
Cyprus Mail

A GROUP of English School parents and alumni voicing concerns about the
`preservation of the school’s Christian and multicultural nature’ have
sought to set the record straight over their views.

Calling themselves the English School Parents and Alumni Initiative,
the group says that a number of teachers are trying to push a specific
political agenda on students.

The views allegedly being imposed on pupils are understood to be
left-wing, which deviate from the standard curriculum regarding the
history of the island.

Some of the group’s grievances include the banning of symbols like the
Greek flag and the cross, the removal of religious icons from the
classroom and the national anthem.

The English School began as a multicultural school for all children of
Cyprus. After the 1974 invasion, Turkish Cypriot children stopped
attending, until 2003 when they were able to cross again to the free
areas.

On its website () the initiative
posted an announcement `for the purpose of avoiding any
misinterpretation or distortion, whether intentional or not, of the
objectives of the Initiative’.

Its first point reads: `Not only does the Initiative not aim at the
exclusion of the Turkish Cypriot students from the School, but it
considers their smooth accession and integration in the School
community, which has already been successfully effected, to be valuable
and beneficial.’

But some teachers, the group says, are abusing their power by promoting
their own views on the inter-communal disturbances of the 1960s and of
the role of EOKA, with what is perceived as an undue emphasis on the
fact that atrocities were also committed by the Greek Cypriot side.

The initiative thinks it has been misrepresented and portrayed as
nationalists or Greek Orthodox zealots.

`Nothing could be farther from the truth. We only ask that teachers
leave their politics at home,’ a source close to the initiative told
the Sunday Mail.

The group is holding a meeting at Nicosia’s Hilton Hotel on 28 January.
Invitations have been sent out to some 500 parents of English School
parents, and the initiative expects a high turnout.

But Kyriacos Vassiliou, chairman of the school’s board of governors,
categorically denies any attempt at indoctrination. He says that
repeated calls to the initiative for a `civilised discussion’ have gone
unanswered, although a couple of concerned parents did meet with him in
private.

`I am extremely saddened that this sort of climate is being created.
Frankly, I don’t know if they know the meaning of the term `exchange of
views’,’ said Vassiliou.

Instead, some teachers have received anonymous letters accusing them of
trying to influence their students. The school says that because the
letters are anonymous it cannot examine them on principle.

On the surface, the two schools of thought see eye to eye on many
things. Both agree that the school should be multicultural and embrace
students from different backgrounds – not only Turkish Cypriots, but
also Armenians, Maronites etc.

But behind the scenes, it is the tactics employed by either side – if
the term is applicable – that have served to poison the climate.

For instance, the Sunday Mail has learned that alarmist rumours began
circulating that a picture of Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Turkish
Republic, would be posted on the school grounds.

It appears that the rumour was started after someone posited, for
argument’s sake, that if the school was indeed multicultural, then
Ataturk should be depicted alongside Greek symbols. Far from suggesting
that this should be done, the point of the argument was that one should
tread a fine line when dealing with nationalist imagery.

On the flipside, it is said that several teachers have been trying to
disseminate pro-AKEL propaganda in classrooms, with the board’s tacit
backing.

One of the complaints concerns the visit of AKEL member, Rolandos
Katsiaounis, who was invited to speak at the end of October to
celebrate Cyprus’ independence, a month late and without the national
anthem.

According to the group, in his speech Katsiaounis said that there had
been no Turkish invasion in 1974. Allegedly, he also told students that
the national anthem belonged to a different country (Greece) and that
it would never be heard again at the school.

Of the 10 members of the board of governors, it’s understood that three
are AKEL sympathisers, three with DIKO, two with DISY, one with
socialists EDEK, and there is one Turkish Cypriot.

Meanwhile the school has employed the services of an American
consultant, who is to assess integration so far and make her
recommendations to the board.

Integration at the school seems to have gone relatively smoothly,
without major problems – and it’s plausible that the pupils themselves
have been caught in the crossfire.

http://www.englishschoolnews.com/