Fitch Ratings Revises Outlook On Armenia’s Foreign And Local Currenc

FITCH RATINGS REVISES OUTLOOK ON ARMENIA’S FOREIGN AND LOCAL CURRENCY ISSUER DEFAULT RATINGS TO POSITIVE FROM STABLE

Arminfo Agency
2007-05-02 21:13:00

Fitch Ratings today revised the Outlook on Armenia’s Foreign and
Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings to Positive from Stable, and
affirmed the ratings at ‘BB-‘ (BB minus), reports Fitch Ratings.

The agency has also affirmed the Country Ceiling at ‘BB’ and the
Short-term Foreign Currency rating at ‘B’.

The Positive Outlook reflects expectations that disciplined
macroeconomic policies and structural reforms will continue,
underpinning sustainable economic growth and a declining public and
external debt burden. However, the policy authorities face significant
challenges in sustaining strong and balanced economic growth against
the backdrop of strong upward pressures on the exchange rate, rapid
expansion of private credit and construction activity, while also
anchoring inflation expectations under the recently introduced direct
inflation targeting regime.

In addition, Armenia faces parliamentary elections in 2007 and a
race for the presidency in 2008. While Fitch does not expect material
changes in the country’s broad economic and foreign policies to arise
from the elections and a new administration, it could potentially
complicate macroeconomic policy management. "The risk of economic
volatility or of a political shock over the next twelve to eighteen
months cannot be wholly discounted," said Andrew Colquhoun, Director
in Fitch’s Sovereigns Group. "But if policy discipline and political
stability are maintained, the secular improvement in creditworthiness
will likely continue and exert upward pressure on the ratings, hence
the Positive Outlook."

The Armenian dram (AMD) appreciated 19% against the US dollar last
year, raising concerns over the competitiveness of the industrial
sector and the trade deficit on goods and services widened to an
estimated 14% of GDP. While the trade deficit and low domestic savings
rate are substantially offset by net transfers of almost 9% of GDP,
mostly from Armenians abroad, the extent of upward pressure on the
Armenian dram (AMD) and pace of appreciation prompted the Central
Bank of Armenia (CBA) to actively intervene in foreign exchange
markets and international reserves have reached a record level of
USD1.1bn. The upward pressure on the AMD was also fuelled by a steep
fall in the share of USD-denominated deposits in the banking system
(in favour of AMD). While the shift from US dollar to Armenian dram
assets is viewed as a positive trend, the pace of the adjustment also
poses policy challenges and risks that must be managed.

Armenia’s ratings are supported by an impressive economic performance
with the economy expanding by more than 11% per annum since 2000 while
annual consumer price inflation has remained below 3%. However, the
combination of a food price shock and robust domestic demand fuelled
by rising household incomes resulted in inflation accelerating to
its highest level since 2004. Inflation has begun to moderate and
is currently running at a little over 5%, inside the CBA’s revised
target of 4%+/minus 1.5% for end-2007. Sustaining rapid economic
growth necessary to raise incomes and reduce extreme poverty without
imperilling macroeconomic stability is key to improvements in Armenia’s
sovereign creditworthiness and ratings.

Armenia’s ratings and Positive Outlook are also supported by
a medium-term fiscal policy framework and prudent budgetary
policies. Gross government debt has fallen to 15% of GDP by end-2006
from 39% in 2000, well below the ‘BB’ range median of 40% and the debt
service burden remains light. However, government revenues remain low
at around 16% of GDP, well below the ‘BB’ median of 28%. While this
in part reflects a policy preference for a small government and free
markets, weak tax administration and widespread evasion are also to
blame, and raising the tax take will be required to fund increasing
social and capital spending needs over the medium term. Further
measures to deepen domestic capital markets would also broaden the
government’s financing options and assist with the graduation from
concessional lending from the international community.

Armenia’s Rating Outlook Raised To ‘Positive’ – Fitch

ARMENIA’S RATING OUTLOOK RAISED TO ‘POSITIVE’ – FITCH

Forbes
May 2 2007

LONDON (Thomson Financial) – Fitch Ratings revised the outlook
on Armenia’s foreign and local currency issuer default ratings
to ‘positive’ from ‘stable’ and affirmed the ratings at ‘BB-‘ on
expectations that economic growth will be sustained on disciplined
macroeconomic policies and structural reforms.

The ratings agency also affirmed the country ceiling at ‘BB’ and the
short-term foreign currency rating at ‘B’.

Armenia’s ratings are supported by an impressive economic performance
with the economy expanding by more than 11 pct each year, since 2000
while annual consumer price inflation has remained below 3 pct. The
ratings and outlook are also supported by a medium-term fiscal policy
framework and prudent budgetary policies, Fitch said.

However, Fitch warned that Armenian policymakers face significant
challenges in sustaining strong and balanced economic growth against
the backdrop of strong upward pressures on the exchange rate, rapid
expansion of private credit and construction activity, while also
anchoring inflation expectations under the recently introduced direct
inflation targeting regime.

In addition, Fitch said upcoming parliamentary elections and
presidential elections in 2008 could potentially complicate
macroeconomic policy management, although it does not expect any
material impact to economic or foreign policy.

Presidential Election Outcomes Annulled In Turkey

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOMES ANNULLED IN TURKEY

PanARMENIAN.Net
02.05.2007 13:46 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkey’s ruling AK Party has asked parliament to
approve early general elections amid deadlock over who should become
the country’s new president. The party formally proposed 24 June for
the polls, which were set for November.

The move comes after Turkey’s constitutional court annulled last
Friday’s vote to elect a new president.

Secularist opposition parties boycotted the vote to prevent the ruling
party candidate, Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, from winning.

They accuse Mr Gul of having a hidden Islamist agenda and say that
if he became president it would threaten Turkey’s secular tradition.

The row over the presidency has exposed deep divisions. On Sunday,
hundreds of thousands of people rallied in Istanbul in support of
secularism.

The army has warned that it will not permit Turkey’s secular traditions
to be compromised, and financial markets in Turkey have also been
hit by the crisis.

The decision to hold early elections must be debated by parliament
and voted into law.

On Tuesday, the constitutional court backed the opposition’s argument
that a quorum of two-thirds of the 550 lawmakers was not present for
the first round of presidential voting.

A total of 361 lawmakers voted – 357 for Mr Gul – but 367 were needed
to make a quorum, the court said.

Speaking after the court decision, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
said the Turkish people should resolve the row.

"The parliamentary system has been blocked… We are urgently going
to the people. Our people will make the best decisions," he said.

He called for the constitution to be changed to allow the president
to be elected by popular vote, rather than by parliament, and to
allow the president to serve up to two five-year terms, instead of
one seven-year term.

Mr Erdogan also pledged to move forward with a new round in the
presidential vote – another vote is set for Thursday – but his
candidate remains unlikely to secure the required two-thirds majority.

Analysts say Mr Erdogan’s election move is an attempt to create a
fresh mandate to end the crisis.

His party has presided over a period of strong economic growth and
could fare well in general elections, analysts believe.

If Mr Gul does become president, he will be the first incumbent to
have Islamist roots, and the first president whose wife wears an
Islamic headscarf.

Both Mr Gul and Mr Erdogan deny there is any hidden Islamist agenda,
and Mr Gul has pledged to adhere to the republic’s secular principles
if he were elected.

But critics fear that if the ruling party controls both the government
and the presidency, it could then try to move Turkey towards Islamic
rule and erode the separation of religion and state, BBC reports.

Exhibit On Rwanda Genocide Opened In The UN

EXHIBIT ON RWANDA GENOCIDE OPENED IN THE UN

ArmRadio.am
02.05.2007 13:53

An exhibit on the lessons of the genocide in Rwanda opened on Monday,
three weeks after Turkey forced its delay because of references to
the murders of Armenians during World War One, Reuters reports.

The language on the Armenians was changed to say "Ottoman Empire"
instead of "Turkey" and does not include the number of people killed
on panels in the exhibit that include photos, statements and video
testimonies.

There was no immediate reaction from Turkey but Armenian envoys and
sponsors of the exhibit, the British-based Aegis, said they were
satisfied with the compromise.

Originally, the lettering on a panel said: "Following World War One,
during which 1 million Armenians were murdered in Turkey, Polish
lawyer Raphael Lemkin urged the League of Nations to recognize crimes
of barbarity as international crimes," Smith said.

The new wording says: "In 1933, the lawyer Raphael Lemkin, a Polish
Jew, urged the League of Nations to recognize mass atrocities against
a particular group as an international crime. He cited mass killings
of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in World War I and other mass
killings in history. He was ignored."

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon opened the exhibit in commemoration of
the 13th anniversary of the Rwanda genocide, in which 800,000 people,
mainly Tutsis and moderate Hutus, were massacred by militant Hutus
in April 1994.

"Genocide never happens by chance. It takes time to plan and
organize. The warning signs are always there," one of the panels in
the exhibit said.

Turkish ‘Secular’ Demonstration Prepares Way For Military Coup

TURKISH ‘SECULAR’ DEMONSTRATION PREPARES WAY FOR MILITARY COUP

Socialist worker, UK
May 1 2007

Generals in Turkey have threatened "military intervention" to halt
a vote in the country’s parliament that could see Abdullah Gul, the
current foreign minister from the mainstream Islamist party Justice
and Development (AK), elected as president.

The generals posted the warning on the Turkish military website last
Friday evening. The next day hundreds of thousands took to the streets
of the capital Ankara in defence of "secularism."

The media painted the demonstration as popular opposition to the
prospect of an Islamist president.

Yet behind the protests lies a sinister move to rein in Turkish
opposition to a possible US war on Iran, and a cynical manoeuvre by
the military to reassert its power after its supporters were humiliated
in the 2002 elections.

In 2003, MPs belonging to the AK blocked moves by the US to use Turkey
as a staging post for its invasion of Iraq.

But, as the occupation of Iraq descends into chaos, the US badly
needs Turkish support for any possible attack on Iran. The generals,
in turn, want the freedom to join in the attack.

The Turkish military has been stoking a conflict with the Kurds in the
south east of the country. Many people believe that the military are
behind the sectarian murders of five Christians and the assassination
of Hrant Dink, an outspoken activist from Turkey’s oppressed Armenian
minority.

The generals attempted to blame the Islamists for the killings.

There was a massive response to Dink’s murder. Over 200,000 people
marched at his funeral chanting, "We are all Armenians."

The military and their right wing supporters have responded to the
support for the Armenians and Gul’s possible election by playing up
the threat to the secular system.

The right wing newspaper Cumhuriyet warned Turks that if Gul becomes
president, the country "will be put back 100 years".

The aim of the protest last Saturday was far from being simply an
outpouring of support for a secular system – it was to build support
for a military coup.

p?article_id=11324

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.ph

Genocide Recognition, Turkey-Armenia Relations, Role of the Diaspora

PRESS RELEASE
ARPA Institute
18106 Miranda St. Tarzana, CA 91356
Contact: Hagop Panossian
Tel: (818) 586-9660
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

ARPA Institute presents the Lecture/Seminar:
`Massacres, Resistance, Protectors of the Armenians
and Assyrians in the 1915 Genocide" " by Dr. David
Gaunt, on Friday, May 11, 2007 at 7: 30 PM at the
Merdinian School auditorium.

The Address is 13330 Riverside Dr., Sherman Oaks, CA
91403. Directions: on the 101 FWY exit on Woodman, go
north and turn right on Riverside Dr.

Abstract: The lecture will discuss what happened to
the Armenian and Assyrian populations living in the
provinces of Diyarbakir, Bitlis, Van and Iranian
Azerbaijan during World War I. This will be based on
extensive use of primary sources in Turkish, Russian,
Iranian as well as Western archives. Also previously
unused witness testimonies and oral history will be
used. This is a region where Armenians and Assyrians
lived side by side in the cities and had rural
villages close to each other. Often the Armenians
would be seized first and the Assyrian sources explain
what happened, then came the turn for the Assyrians.
In some places both groups put up a common defense,
for instance Antranik’s volunteer brigades had
Assyrians fighting side by side with the Armenians.
Some Assyrian tribes joined the Russian army that was
on its way to relieve Van and fought with the Turks.
The greater part of the massacres, ethnic cleansings
and other atrocities occurred between May and
September of 1915, and the extent of population loss
was close to 90% in the Diyarbakir province. The
latter was also used as killing fields for deportation
caravans coming from the north. The lecture will be
based on the recent book Massacres, Resistance,
Protectors: Muslim-Christian relations in Eastern
Anatolia during World War I (Piscataway, N. J.:
Gorgias Pres 2006).

David Gaunt is professor of history at Södertörn
University College in Stockholm, Sweden. This
university is in the midst of one of the largest
Assyrian Diaspora communities in the world. He is a
social historian and has previously written primarily
on the Scandinavian workers movement, and family
history. A few years ago he began with genocide
studies and edited Resistance and Collaboration in the
Holocaust: Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania (Bern
2004).

For more Information Please call Dr. Hagop Panossian
at (818) 586-9660

http://www.arpainstitute.org/

CR: Rep. Capuano Commemorates Armenian Genocide

[Congressional Record: April 23, 2007 (Extensions)]
[Page E834-E835]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr23ap07-50]

COMMEMORATING THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

______

HON. MICHAEL E. CAPUANO

of massachusetts

in the house of representatives

Monday, April 23, 2007

Mr. CAPUANO. Madam Speaker, I rise today to commemorate a people who
despite murder, hardship, and betrayal have persevered. April 24, 2007,
marks the 92nd anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.
Throughout three decades in the late 19th and early 20th centuries,
millions of Armenians were systematically uprooted from their homeland
of 3,000 years and deported or massacred. From 1894 through 1896, three
hundred thousand Armenians were ruthlessly murdered. Again in 1909,
thirty thousand Armenians were massacred in Cilicia, and their villages
were destroyed.
On April 24, 1915, two hundred Armenian religious, political, and
intellectual leaders were arbitrarily arrested, taken to Turkey and
murdered. This incident marks a dark and solemn period in the history
of the Armenian people. From 1915 to 1923, the Ottoman Empire launched
a systematic campaign to exterminate Armenians. In 8 short years, more
than 1.5 million Armenians suffered through atrocities such as
deportation, forced slavery and torture. Most were ultimately murdered.
Many of our companions in the international community have already
taken this final step.

[[Page E835]]

The European Parliament and the United Nations have recognized and
reaffirmed the Armenian Genocide as historical fact, as have the
Russian and Greek parliaments, the Canadian House of Commons, the
Lebanese Chamber of Deputies and the French National Assembly. It is
time for America to join the chorus and acknowledge the Armenians who
suffered at the hands of the Ottoman Empire. And let me stress that I
am not speaking of the government of modern day Turkey, but rather its
predecessor, which many of Turkey’s present day leaders helped to
remove from power.
As I have in the past, as a member of the Congressional Armenian
Caucus, I will continue to work with my colleagues and with the
Armenian-Americans in my district to promote investment and prosperity
in Armenia. And, I sincerely hope that this year, the U.S. will have
the opportunity and courage to speak in support of the millions of
Armenians who suffered because of their heritage.

____________________

Armenia’s Artistic Bridge From East To West

ARMENIA’S ARTISTIC BRIDGE FROM EAST TO WEST
By Souren Melikian

International Herald Tribune, France
April 27 2007

PARIS: It is not easy to display the art of a major culture left in
tatters by organized physical destruction over centuries that reduced
its territory to a tiny fraction of its historical dimension. What
mostly survives is the art of religion, the hard-core to which the
persecuted cling and carry away if portable. Otherwise it is fragments
collected from ruins. Hence the title of the Armenian art show on
view at the Louvre until May 21 – "Armenia Sacra."

The exhibition book is as much about history as about art, a necessity
when introducing a culture known to few other than specialists.

It might have been worth mentioning that Armenia had a very long past
when King Tiridate made it the first country where Christianity was
declared the state religion around 313, when Byzantium only made its
worship permissible.

The origins of Armenia are steeped in mystery. How the Armenians,
whose language is Indo-European, substituted themselves for the
non-Indo-European inhabitants of the preceding kingdom of Urartu
around the 7th century B.C. is unexplained. If there was a fusion of
two groups, history says nothing about it.

Armenia was included in the empire founded by the Persian Achaemenid
dynasty in the mid-6th century B.C. and from the beginning had close
links to Iranian culture while maintaining an utterly different
identity. Some magnificent silver wine horns in Achaemenid style,
excavated in Armenia after World War II, are usually described as
Iranian and yet they can be seen at a glance to be aesthetically
different from the vessels excavated in Iran. This Iranian connection
persisted through time. Linguists say that well over a third of words
in the Armenian vocabulary today are of Iranian origin, ranging from
Parthian Pahlavi of the late 2nd or 1st century B.C. to present-day
Persian.

Today in Culture

The subtle Desiderio: Breathing life into cool marble

Armenia’s artistic bridge from East to West

Ex-CIA chief, in book, assails Cheney on Iraq

The other part of the world to which Armenia had ties was the Roman
Empire – the land was split again and again between Iran and Rome,
later replaced in the East by the Byzantine Empire.

This twin connection with East and West remained perceptible throughout
Armenian history.

It was the case with the first art spawned by the advent of
Christianity of which the earliest surviving fragments do not predate
the 5th century A.D. However disparate these look stylistically, they
mostly share a monumental quality and an austere gravity maintained
even when startling irony creeps in. Figural art, sometimes rough,
invariably explodes with vigor. On one capital of starkly geometrical
shape from Dvin, a Virgin and Child carved in low relief stare
hypnotically at the viewer. It has a Romanesque feel to it but is
not later than the 5th or 6th century A.D.

The stem of a stone cross also from Dvin is topped by the head of
Jesus in a style strangely reminiscent of the human masks found in
early 1st millennium B.C. bronzes from Luristan, in western Iran.

This aesthetic diversity was maintained into the 7th century A.D. if
the datings suggested by art historians are right. Sacred art and
irony continued to be paradoxically associated. In a roundel carved
in sunken relief, Jesus ascends into heaven, standing in a mandorla
held up by two angels while worshippers below raise their hands in
prayer. All have incongruous goggle eyes – again these call to mind the
art of Luristan with its funny human heads topping bronze ensigns. No
archaeological context throws light on this intriguing sculpture.

But even a documented context does not necessarily resolve enigmas.

On a huge stone capital nearly two meters, or six and a half feet,
long recovered from the church at Zvartnots, an eagle spreads its
wings horizontally. This is a distant offshoot of Roman iconography,
with some input from Sasanian Iran. Its meaning in a church remains
open to speculation.

Iranian reminiscences kept surfacing in early Armenian art as they
do in two 6th or 7th century folios inside a 10th century Gospel from
Echmiadzin. Syria, inspired the triangular tops flanking the rounded
arch of a niche, but the outfits of the Magi are borrowed from late
Sasanian conventions, as the art historian Andre Grabar noted long ago.

Riddles continue to stake out the evolution of Armenian art well into
the 9th century. Wooden capitals from a church at Sevan, which were
published long ago, induced one of the contributors to the exhibition
book, Yvetta Mkrichian, to characterize their shape as "singular."

They actually relate to models found later in the domestic
architecture of Iranian Central Asia. The carved pattern draws
its motifs from the repertoire of contemporary Iran and transforms
them aesthetically. Again one wonders what meaning these had in the
context of an Armenian church. One of them, hitherto unrecognized,
reproduces the eagle wings of the Sasanian royal headdress as seen
by artists from Islamic Iran. The key to such riddles surely lies in
Armenian and Persian literature.

One of the great masterpieces in the exhibition, the A.D. 1134 wooden
doors and their frame removed from the Monastery at Mush (pronounced
"moosh") shows that the link with Iranian art kept being renewed
at intervals. The commentator in the exhibition book appears to be
unaware that the figural scenes featuring two jousting horsemen and two
other mounted heroes on the lintel deal with Iranian literary themes,
as do the two rounds of animals carved on each side. The geometrical
patterns in the main areas could again be seen as part of an Iranian
rather than Arab influence.

Aesthetically, the transformation is as obvious as the consummate
mastery. This is a masterpiece in isolation that bears witness to an
otherwise vanished school of architectural woodwork.

The confidence with which Armenian artists, from stone or wood
carvers to painters and goldsmiths, borrowed from the outside world
and recast the loans on their own terms is a feature shared by all
powerful cultures from Iran to India to China. What makes Armenia
astonishing is its eclecticism and its aptitude at welding together
seemingly incompatible components.

A striking case is offered by the incorporation of formal Islamic
patterns into Christian art. The early 13th-century cornice of one
of those tall stelae with crosses carved in sunken relief known as
"khachkar" is carved in the center with the figure of Jesus enthroned
under a polylobed arch. On the book that Jesus holds open on his
lap, the verse from John: 8.12 reads in its Armenian version:
"I am the Light of the World." On either side, dazzling patterns
of swirling scrolls have a rhythm and a complexity that makes them
utterly different from those of Iran to the east or of the Arab areas
of Iraq to the south.

This aptitude at creating afresh, however hybrid the mix, comes
out most astonishingly in the manuscripts copied and illuminated in
Cilicia along the Mediterranean shore of present-day Turkey.

A Franco-Armenian kingdom came into existence in the area following the
wedding in the late 11th century of a French nobleman and an Armenian
princess. By the 12th century it had a large population of Armenians
driven away from their homeland by incessant warfare. For a century
and a half or so, Cilicia became a second Armenia, leaving astonishing
castles and ramparts that still stand at Yilankale or Anavarza and
giving birth to an art of the book that blends Byzantine iconography,
the color scheme of French medieval manuscripts and formal ornament
from Islamic Iran.

A lectionary copied in 1286, perhaps in the town of Sis, offers a
remarkable example of this blending of artistic syncretism.

Cilicia thus became the first true meeting ground of East and West,
relatively immune from the violent antagonism that characterized it
in Sicily and Spain. The Cilician experience probably paved the way
to the easy transition that some Armenians made to the West, creating
an even more hybrid art of the book in places such as Perugia in Italy.

Cilician art also traveled back East. It left its imprint on the
Gospel illuminated in 1323 at Glajor in the Siunik Province to the
northwest of Iran. But the painter, Toros of Taron, owes to Syrian
book painting from the time the baroque rockery and plants – which
the exhibition book does not say.

Internationalism began centuries ago and few practiced it with greater
alacrity in art than the Armenians.

/arts/melik28.php

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/27

OMX To Acquire The Armenian Stock Exchange And Central Depository

OMX TO ACQUIRE THE ARMENIAN STOCK EXCHANGE AND CENTRAL DEPOSITORY

AFX Europe (Focus)
Published: Apr 27, 2007

STOCKHOLM (Thomson Financial) – OMX AB said it has signed a letter of
intent with the Central Bank of Armenia and the Armenian government,
regarding the acquisition of the Armenian Stock Exchange and the
Central Depository of Armenia.

OMX said the size of the Armenian market is currently small by any
standards, but it sees the potential for growth due to a number of
contributing factors, such as the upcoming pension reform, changes
to the legal framework and an increased focus on the equity market
as a source of capital for companies in the region.

No financial details were disclosed.

Human Rights Were Violated On Both Sides Of Border Of Karabakh

HUMAN RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED ON BOTH SIDES OF BORDER OF KARABAKH

KarabakhOpen
26-04-2007 11:29:04

"I do not consider it as a victory or achievement, because the
statement in the U.S. Department of State report on Azerbaijan did
not change. Besides, the American co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group
Matthew Bryza stated yesterday that there will be no more changes to
the report of the U.S. Department of State," said Vahram Atanesyan,
chair of the Committee of External Relations, in an interview with
the KarabakhOpen.

The member of parliament commented on the situation after the
U.S. State Department made changes to the Armenia country report on
human rights practices.

The statement "Armenia continues to occupy the Azerbaijani territory
of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding Azerbaijani territories"
was replaced by " Armenian forces occupy large portions of Azerbaijan
territory adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenian officials maintain
that they do not "occupy" Nagorno-Karabakh itself." Official Armenia
presented the amendment to the report as a major achievement of the
Armenian diplomacy.

"I appreciate more the stance of the United States which mediates
the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, and states that the future
status of Karabakh should be defined through talks. It is a more
balanced approach than the one which was stated in the report of
the U.S. Department of State. Although I have to note that it is
strange when the report on human rights includes such statements. If
the violation of human rights in the result of the Karabakh conflict
is meant, these rights were violated on both sides of the border –
Azerbaijan launched a policy of violence and deportation against
the Armenian population when the Soviet Union still existed. The
peaceful Armenian population of the territories adjacent to the former
Autonomous Region of Nagorno-Karabakh was also deported. However,
it should not be viewed on the same level because the deportation of
the Azerbaijani population took place during the military actions,
and the evacuation of the population was organized by the Azerbaijani
government for the security of these people. However, even if the
stress of the report were on this, it would be clear, but it is not
clear how the status of Nagorno-Karabakh is linked to human rights,
especially that the report does not maintain that the rights of the
Armenians of Karabakh were also violated," Vahram Atanesyan said.

The member of parliament thinks the report of the Department of State
is highly politicized in this respect, "which is not appropriate for
the Department of State of such an authoritative country." "For me,
I accept the stance of the United States, which does not predetermine
the status of NKR," said Vahram Atanesyan. The member of parliament
said he understands Vardan Oskanyan because it is the pre-election
period, and "it is possible that certain accents in Vardan Oskanyan’s
words had notes of propaganda."