Leader Of Progressive Party Of Armenia Tigran Urikhanyan Calls Human

LEADER OF PROGRESSIVE PARTY OF ARMENIA TIGRAN URIKHANYAN CALLS HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER MIKAEL DANIELYAN TO DEBATES

arminfo
2008-05-26 20:44:00

ArmInfo. Leader of the Progressive Party of Armenia Tigran Urikhanyan
calls Mikael Danielyan, a human rights defender, the head of the
Helsinki Association, to public debates in connection with the recent
incident.

As the Progressive Party’s press-service recalls, "on May 21 an
incident took place in Teryan Street in Yerevan, during which the
famous human rights defender, head of the Helsinki Association,
Mikael Danielyan, being in a drunken state, spied by taxi on the
leader of the Progressive Party, Tigran Urikhanyan, who was in his
administrative car. During a squabble, Danielyan hit Urikhanyan with
an unknown thing. Having serious problems with health, Urikhanyan
used his gas pistol and fired a blank shot into the air".

However, according to the Progressive Party’s press-service,
"Danielyan disseminated false information. Though Urikhanyan is sure of
impartiality of the investigation, forthcoming conviction and arrest
of Danielyan, nevertheless, the Progressive Party’s leader is ready
to give Danielyan a chance to present his viewpoint and offer him to
take part in public debates at the TV program "My right". Urikhanyan
said that "he is ready to respond to all accusations of Danielyan
before the Armenian public and the whole world. If Danielyan fails
to respond to this offer before May 28 inclusive, we’ll state that
he has something to conceal from the Armenian public and this is why
he evades public debates", Urikhanyan said.

President Of Armenia Received Chairman Of Rosgosstrakh Holding

PRESIDENT OF ARMENIA RECEIVED CHAIRMAN OF ROSGOSSTRAKH HOLDING

RIA Oreanda
May 23 2008
Russia

Yerevan . OREANDA-NEWS . On May 20, 2008 at the meeting discussed
were issues pertaining to the priorities in the economic development
of Armenia, prospects of development in the areas of insurance,
banking and financial structures, reported the Official website
.

The parties spoke also about the tendencies in global economy.

http://news.president.am

ANCA-ER Marks 89th Anniversary Of Pontian Genocide At New York City

ANCA-ER MARKS 89TH ANNIVERSARY OF PONTIAN GENOCIDE AT NEW YORK CITY EVENT

armradio.am
23.05.2008 10:50

Armenian National Committee of America Eastern Region (ANCA ER)
Executive Director took part in commemorating the 89th Anniversary
of the Pontian Genocide. Strong winds and brisk temperatures did not
keep community activists from gathering at Bowling Green Park for
the first New York City commemoration.

Organizing the event was the Federation of Hellenic Societies
of Greater New York and the Pan-Pontian Federation of USA and
Canada. Dimitris Molohides, Secretary of the Pan-Pontian Federation
of USA and Canada, addressed the crowd in attendance and urged for
decisive action for recognition of the Pontian Genocide.

Molohides, who spoke at the Armenian Genocide commemorative event
at City Hall in New York City during the ANC of NY’s April 24th
event stated "today, May 19th the Pontian community with Hellenes
and Philhellenes here in New York City and around the world will
commemorate the 89th anniversary of the Pontian… it is the first
time that we gather here in the Bowling Green Park in the heart of the
economic center of New York City to raise together the Greek flag and
the single-headed eagle symbol of Pontus. Today’s event is an emotional
but also a historical moment for all of us that are present here."

Speaking on behalf of the ANCA, Birazian addressed the crowd. In
her statement she remarked: "the tragic sufferings of Armenians,
Assyrians, and Greeks will never be forgotten. The Turkish Government
tries to silence us, but we will not be silenced, and together we will
in fact end Turkey’s "Gag Rule" and seek recognition of this great
crime. Nine decades ago they tried to silence the innocent victims
that fell under the Turkish sword, and today we are still here. Nine
decades from now we will still be here for we will never forget and
work to seek justice" (Full comments can be read below).

Also present at the event include the Cypriot Action Network of America
(CANA), the presidents and members of the two local associations
"Komninoi" of New York and "Pontos" of Norwalk Connecticut and from the
"Holy Institution Panagia Soumela." Speakers included Reverend Father
Ioannis Romas from the St. Nicholas church that was destroyed on 9/11,
Mr. Dimitris Dimitriou, General Secretary – Federation of Hellenic
Societies of Greater New York, Mr. Elias Tsekerides, Past President
of Pan-Pontian Federation USA & Canada, Ms. Donna Fotiadou, member and
coordinating committee of the Pontian Youth Association USA & Canada,
and Mr. Ioannis Fidanakis, President of Panthracian Union of America
"Orpheus."

The Ottoman Empire, under the cover of World War I, undertook a
systematic and deliberate effort to eliminate its minority Christian
populations. This genocidal campaign resulted in the death and
deportation of well over 2,000,000 Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks.

The Pontian Genocide has been formally acknowledged by Greece and
Cyprus and, within the United States, by the states of New York,
New Jersey, Florida, South Carolina, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and
Illinois, among others. Most recently, the International Association
of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) released a statement commenting:

"Be it resolved that it is the conviction of the International
Association of Genocide Scholars that the Ottoman campaign against
Christian minorities of the Empire between 1914 and 1923 constituted
a genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian and Anatolian
Greeks.

Be it further resolved that the Association calls upon the government
of Turkey to acknowledge the genocides against these populations,
to issue a formal apology, and to take prompt and meaningful steps
toward restitution."

Meeting Venue Is Sardarapat Memorial

MEETING VENUE IS SARDARAPAT MEMORIAL

A1+
[01:10 pm] 23 May, 2008

The Centre for the Popular Movement is going to celebrate May 28.

90 years ago these days Armenians were fighting a heroic battle against
foreign invaders in Sardarapat, Bash-Aparan and Gharakilisa. The
imperative of avoiding a final annihilation united the whole nation.

Due to their unyielding determination Armenians won the battles. The
victories contributed to the materialization of the first Republic
of Armenia.

Today, on the eve of the celebration of this great holiday, each
of us is filled with contradictious feelings. One the one hand,
you are eager to honour the memory of the heroes and celebrate their
glorious victory. On the other, your rights and fundamental freedoms
are breached by your brutal compatriots.

Today’s heroes are jailed for nothing.

And you celebrate a holiday in a country where political persecutions
and violations continue every day. Until our heroes are imprisoned we
shall demonstrate firm determination and will-power turning holidays
and commemorations into a struggle day as we did on April 24 and May 9.

We shall attend the memorial complex of the Sardarapat battle at 1.00
May 28 /the oval square at the entrance/. Later in the day we shall
hold a public merry-making at Liberty Square," runs the statement of
the Centre.

SOFIA: Varna Condemns Armenian Genocide

VARNA CONDEMNS ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
Petar Kostadinov

Sofia Echo
May 22 2008
Bulgaria

The municipal council in the city of Varna on the Black Sea adopted a
declaration on May 21 2008, which condemned Armenian genocide in 1915,
local Cherno More daily said.

Twenty-four councilors supported the declaration. Councilors also
decided to declare May 24 as the day of commemorating the victims
of the genocide, which happened in the times when Ottoman empire
still existed.

Councilors hoped that their decision would prompt a similar reaction
from other cities in the country and would lead to a similar decision
made on a nation level, Cherno More said.

The issue on recognising the 1915 events as a genocide against Armenian
people has been raised several times in Parliament by the opposition,
but there has never been a decision on it, with the ruling majority
refusing to put on the agenda.

The last time this happened on January 17 2008, when the ruling
majority refused to review three draft declarations that aimed at
recognising the Armenian genocide.

They were tabled by ultra-nationalist Ataka party’s leader Volen
Siderov, the leader of nationalist party Internal Macedonian
Revolutionary Organisation Krassimir Karakachanov and the United
Democratic Forces coalition.

Alexander Radoslavov from the ruling Bulgarian Socialist Party said
back then that he voted against the declarations because there was
too much "hatred" in them, which "was not what a national Parliament
should preach".

He also said that "historical facts are one, but the political reality
was something else". This remark referred to Bulgaria’s neighbour
Turkey, the successor of the Ottoman empire, who denies the events
from 1915/1922 as a genocide.

A declaration adopted by Bulgarian Parliament on the topic would beyond
doubt have consequences on bilateral relations. Such a position is
strongly defended by the ruling coalition partner the Movement for
Rights and Freedoms (MRF), which represented mainly Muslim Bulgarians
of Turkish decent.

When the issue was raised in Parliament in April 2007, MRF MPs left
the hall as a sign of protest against the discussion on whether the
death of nearly 1.5 million Armenians was a genocide or not. MRF MPs
were also against Parliament holding a minute of silence in memory
of the victims.

MRF deputy-chairman Lyutvi Mestan said that the MRF had distanced
itself from historical events that have not been properly evaluated
yet and had been used for political purposes.

The May 21 vote in Varna put the town on the list with Bulgarian cities
that have already recognised the events as a genocide. Plovdiv, Rousse
and Bourgas have adopted similar declarations, with MRF challenging
the vote in Rousse in court. Unfortunately, Sofia is not on the list.

Earlier this April, Sofia was one step closer to adopt a declaration,
but councillors from the Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria
(GERB) party of Sofia mayor Boiko Borissov, withdrew their proposal
in the last minute. "I don’t want to confront Turkey," Borissov told
reporters at the time.

Samvel Farmanyan Appointed RA President’S Spokesman

SAMVEL FARMANYAN APPOINTED RA PRESIDENT’S SPOKESMAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
21.05.2008 13:34 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On May 20, Serzh Sargsyan signed a decree on
dismissal of Viktor Soghomonyan from the post of the President’s
spokesman, the RA leader’s press office reported.

By another decree, Samvel Farmanyan was appointed as spokesman for
the President of Armenia

Book Review: A New Syntax

Arpine Konyalian Grenier
Part, Part Euphrates
reviewed by Celia Lisset Alvarez
38pp. NeO Pepper Press. US$10. 0978840755 paper

A New Syntax

Arpine Konyalian Grenier’s Part, Part Euphrates collapses both landscape
and time in a collection of poetry that challenges the reader to
reconstruct both narrative and place from language that defies logic and
tradition. Grenier creates her own evocative grammar of soul, self, and
society in these five interrelated poems that together make up a mosaic
narrative perhaps best referred to as political ecofeminism, but that
really escape easy categorizations. Although heavily imbued with
bittersweet glimpses of a deconstructed Lebanon traceable to Grenier’s
Armenian identity, Part, Part Euphrates is intensely personal and
passionate rather than simply driven by sociopolitical concerns.

The brief collection opens with `Lebanon regardless) would you
rather . . . ,’ a wistful look at the mysterious relationship with `G’
that anchors the personal narrative thread of the book. The speaker is
perturbed by the fractured realtionship to G and the presence of a woman
from his past:

he was her borrowed once a bruise on top each limb
her totem pole detailing a flower near original
shadow re-examined for rainmaking

Combining free verse with prose poetry, Grenier crafts a broken
narrative of loss and doubt in this poem, interspersing personal
questions (`Why do I feel her spirit interfering with my realtionship
with G’) and fractured memories with a decidedly urban and postmodern
sensibility best captured into the lines `the world is / my lover is.’
The speaker asserts that `nothing is new in Lebanon since you and I
cracked,’ and this collapse of self and city sets the stage for the rest
of the collection.

Subsequent poems play off of this classic feminist tension between the
personal and the political. `The Enthusiast’ bemoans the relationship
between Beirut’s past and present in language that attempts to
illuminate a neglected women’s history: `So the deal is – poor ugly
motherless Beirut suffering anonymity.’ Grenier examines how `the theme
of man’ has excluded its female counterpart (`I’m not a daughter they
say / I did not see it happen mama’) in a gesture she compares to
`backing against a one way street’ and provocatively calls `syntax
blackened.’ She ends this poem both hopefully and forcefully, implying
that women’s struggle for voice, and, obliquely, for economic freedom
(`today is the first day you’re a pay-stub mother / beaming at a new
syntax’), will bring about a new vision for Beirut:

these are not ours these streets we fight in
banal for some reason and emptied star
the watch in reverse
a new syntax
prepared
-ness

out there
street signals

turnpike
lane

Though difficult to unravel, the images in `The Enthusiast’ suggest the
overall raison d’etre of Grenier’s poetry in this collection, the
creation of a `new syntax’ driven by a woman-centered multiplicity of
voice that takes Audre Lorde’s imperative to dismantle the master’s
house to a multicultural level.

Very much the anchor poem of the group, `The Enthusiast’ also introduces
the concept of male versus female theming or viewing that unites all
five poems. `Gatekeeper, we unthemed’ brings together the languages of
science, gender, and politics to question the ways in which we relate to
one another:

there is no consensus or dissent they say
within the urge to connect
un-themed

is the neutral such?
how do where and how enter theme?
how does how many enter zero?
I had a dad and father and daddy
is that too synoptic for you?

Unlike in `The Enthusiast,’ in `Gatekeeper’ there is no sense of a
gendered optimism. This poem is nightmarish and urgent. Grenier speaks
of being `afraid of water and air and everything green or living’
because `what is free or living must be commoditized and digitized.’
There is a strong sense of disaster in this poem, where being `unthemed’
also means being `unaccounted for.’ The individual is powerless vis à
vis a machinery of destruction that threatens both the natural world and
its `private corners.’ Although sure to find resonance with many
readers, the poem lacks the unity of vision of `The Enthusiast,’ leaving
one with more questions than answers.

Ultimately, however, Grenier presents a beautifully braided collection
of poems that culminate in the final `Public at The Pergola,’ in which
all the themes of Part, Part Euphrates come together in a moving,
postmodern collage of poetry and prose. Finally `unthemed,’ the speaker
of `Pergola’ asks

what to do with the scissors you gave me (Ottoman)
what to do with the embroidered cross on one side
the linguist and research analyst positions at United Technologies
on the other the Biblical whole limbic

The speaker’s indecision and desperation is tenderly confessed in a
letter to G and a job application that recalls the `enthusiasm / work
ethic’ of `The Enthusiast.’ Grenier offers no easy resolutions. Like the
river, the collection is `recurring . . . / breeding its underside.’
What is remarkable about it is Grenier’s ability to engage with language
on its most primal, semiotic level. Words, images, and space collide and
explode into each other, and meaning is accumulated rather than created.
Such stylistic freshness sets this collection apart from other
treatments of these (post)modern themes of individualism, gender, and
ecology. Moreover, Grenier’s ability to navigate the uncharted with
grace and beauty also sets her writing apart from poetry that is
unconventional merely to shock or transgress. She creates her own syntax
and her own myth. She writes in the epigraph: `With an eternal lack of
selfhood and longing for ancestry I am creeping along the sidelines of
rhetoric and process hoping for an outcome that transcends my ability to
determine the good in it.’

Celia Lisset Alvarez is a writer and educator from Miami, Florida. Her
poetry includes The Stones (Finishing Line Press, 2006) and
Shapeshifting (Spire Press, 2006), winner of the 2005 Spire Press Poetry
Award. Poems from these collections are also in the anthologies White
Ink: Poems on Mothers and Motherhood (Demeter Press, 2007) and Letters
to the World (Red Hen Press, 2008). Other stories and poems have
appeared in the Iodine Poetry Journal, the Powhatan Review, Tar Wolf
Review, Poui: The Cave Hill Literary Annual, zingmagazine, and Mangrove,
and in the anthology Women Moving Forward: Narratives of Identity,
Migration, Resilience, and Hope, Vol. 1. (Cambridge Scholars Press,
2006). Her review of Christine Stewart-Nuñez’s Unbound & Branded is
forthcoming from Prairie Schooner. She currently teaches composition,
literature, scientific and creative writing at St. Thomas University in
Miami Gardens, Florida.

ml
This review is about 4 printed pages long. It is copyright © Celia
Lisset Alvarez and Jacket magazine 2008.

http://www.tashogi.com/neopp.htm
http://jacketmagazine.com/35/index.sht

The "Target" – National Values And Human Emotions

THE "TARGET" – NATIONAL VALUES AND HUMAN EMOTIONS
By Hasmik Haroutiunian

AZG Armenian Daily
21/05/2008

Culture

"I remember, the audience kept silence after the premiere of the
film. Then one of the soldiers approached me, shook my hand and said,
"Thank you. Now I understood for what I fought". These words were the
best appraisal of my film", says film-director Shavarsh Vardanian,
who is one of the active participants of 1988 movement. He made films
of Khodzalu, Shahumian and Shushi liberation battles during Artsakh
war to tell the future generations about the heroism and victorious
spirit of the Armenian people.

"The others took up arms to go to war; my weapon was my camera".

In "Tirakh" (Target) film shot in 2000 Shavarsh Vardanian comments on
the struggle for existence in Artsakh with the eyes of documentalist
and a man who took part in the war.

It seems that the film is an autobiography but in the background we
see the battle-field, the disaster of the war and the marriage of
the hero as a call of new life at the end of the film.

Ethnic pressure

Ethnic pressure

EDITORIAL

The Globe and Mail, Canada

455 Words
Monday, May 19, 2008
Page A10

The Toronto District School Board has set a dangerous precedent by
yielding to demands from the Turkish-Canadian community that it
withdraw a book about genocide from the recommended reading list of a
new high school course.

The board’s capitulation over the inclusion of Barbara Coloroso’s
Extraordinary Evil: A Brief History of Genocide in a grade 11 history
course called Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity creates the
unsettling perception that individual ethnic groups can dictate the
way we teach history in our public schools.

Other boards across Canada have already shown interest in replicating
the new course, which magnifies the implications of blacklisting
Ms. Coloroso’s work.

The complaints stretched well beyond the book to claims that more than
a million Armenian deaths in the early 20th century should be excluded
from genocide studies, echoing assertions by the Turkish state and
some scholars that the victims were casualties of the First World War.

To the board’s credit, the course will still classify the massacres as
a genocide while encouraging student awareness of conflicting
opinions, a laudable stance given that the overwhelming mass of
scholarship on the subject has approved the genocide label, as have
Canada, 21 other countries and 41 U.S. states.

But its assertion that the book has been pulled because it is "not a
good example of rigorous historical scholarship" raises questions
about the board’s own rigour in choosing the text in the first
place. If it is as historically shaky as now claimed, it should never
have reached the list.

Board documents claim the book was chosen for its relevance to the
course – both focus on the tragedies of Armenia, Rwanda and the
Holocaust – and call Ms. Coloroso "a renowned educator." Reviews of
the book describe her as an accomplished lecturer and an expert in
parenting and education, all of which casts doubt on claims that her
writing is unsuitable for high school students.

The decision also promises to consider a lobbyist’s request to include
texts by Bernard Lewis and Guenter Lewy. Some Armenian groups question
the scholarly reputations of both writers for their public denials
that the deaths constituted genocide.

The board softened its stance slightly by allowing that Ms. Coloroso’s
text could be useful for a segment of the course, on the social
psychology of genocide, because of its thesis that describes genocide
as akin to schoolyard bullying, another subject she has studied
extensively.

Last week Ms. Coloroso said she is frustrated that the board had been
bullied by a small group. She of all people seems unlikely to use the
term "bully" lightly, and her lament is sure to resonate with those
who treat history as a controversial field that invites debate.

globeandmail.com and The Globe and Mail are divisison of CTVglobemedia
Publishing Inc., 444 Front St. W., Toronto, Canada M5V 2S9
Philip Crawley, Publisher

NA Votes To Amend RA Law On Conducting Meetings, Assemblies, Rallies

NA VOTES TO AMEND RA LAW ON CONDUCTING MEETINGS, ASSEMBLIES, RALLIES AND DEMONSTRATIONS

armradio.am
20.05.2008 15:15

With 93 pro and 6 con votes and 1 abstention the National Assembly
today passed the draft law on the Amendments of the Law on Conducting
Meetings, Assemblies, Rallies and Demonstrations of the Republic of
Armenia. Deputies of the "Heritage" faction voted against the bill,
independent MP Viktor Dallakyan abstained.

The amendments were worked out, considering the suggestions of
international expert organizations – the OCE Office for Democratic
Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR), and the Venice Commission
of the Council of Europe. The attitude of the above-mentioned
structures on the draft law was positive.

Following the voting, the author of the bill, NA Speaker Tigran
Torosyan called on the Deputies to present suggestions before the
second reading.