Do these mysterious stones mark the site of the Garden of Eden?

28 February 2009

Do these mysterious stones mark the site of the Garden of Eden?
By Tom Cox

Last updated at 9:10 PM on 28th February 2009

For the old Kurdish shepherd, it was just another burning hot day in the
rolling plains of eastern Turkey. Following his flock over the arid
hillsides, he passed the single mulberry tree, which the locals regarded
as ‘sacred’. The bells on his sheep tinkled in the stillness. Then he
spotted something. Crouching down, he brushed away the dust, and exposed
a strange, large, oblong stone.

The man looked left and right: there were similar stone rectangles,
peeping from the sands. Calling his dog to heel, the shepherd resolved
to inform someone of his finds when he got back to the village. Maybe
the stones were important.

They certainly were important. The solitary Kurdish man, on that
summer’s day in 1994, had made the greatest archaeological discovery in
50 years. Others would say he’d made the greatest archaeological
discovery ever: a site that has revolutionised the way we look at human
history, the origin of religion – and perhaps even the truth behind the
Garden of Eden.

The site has been described as ‘extraordinary’ and ‘the most important’
site in the world

A few weeks after his discovery, news of the shepherd’s find reached
museum curators in the ancient city of Sanliurfa, ten miles south-west
of the stones.

They got in touch with the German Archaeological Institute in Istanbul.
And so, in late 1994, archaeologist Klaus Schmidt came to the site of
Gobekli Tepe (pronounced Go-beckly Tepp-ay) to begin his excavations.

As he puts it: ‘As soon as I got there and saw the stones, I knew that
if I didn’t walk away immediately I would be here for the rest of my
life.’

Remarkable find: A frieze from Gobekli Tepe

Schmidt stayed. And what he has uncovered is astonishing. Archaeologists
worldwide are in rare agreement on the site’s importance. ‘Gobekli Tepe
changes everything,’ says Ian Hodder, at Stanford University.

David Lewis-Williams, professor of archaeology at Witwatersrand
University in Johannesburg, says: ‘Gobekli Tepe is the most important
archaeological site in the world.’

Some go even further and say the site and its implications are
incredible. As Reading University professor Steve Mithen says: ‘Gobekli
Tepe is too extraordinary for my mind to understand.’

So what is it that has energised and astounded the sober world of
academia?

The site of Gobekli Tepe is simple enough to describe. The oblong
stones, unearthed by the shepherd, turned out to be the flat tops of
awesome, T-shaped megaliths. Imagine carved and slender versions of the
stones of Avebury or Stonehenge.

Most of these standing stones are inscribed with bizarre and delicate
images – mainly of boars and ducks, of hunting and game. Sinuous
serpents are another common motif. Some of the megaliths show crayfish
or lions.

The stones seem to represent human forms – some have stylised ‘arms’,
which angle down the sides. Functionally, the site appears to be a
temple, or ritual site, like the stone circles of Western Europe.

To date, 45 of these stones have been dug out – they are arranged in
circles from five to ten yards across – but there are indications that
much more is to come. Geomagnetic surveys imply that there are hundreds
more standing stones, just waiting to be excavated.

So far, so remarkable. If Gobekli Tepe was simply this, it would already
be a dazzling site – a Turkish Stonehenge. But several unique factors
lift Gobekli Tepe into the archaeological stratosphere – and the realms
of the fantastical.

The Garden of Eden come to life: Is Gobekli Tepe where the story began?

The first is its staggering age. Carbon-dating shows that the complex is
at least 12,000 years old, maybe even 13,000 years old.

That means it was built around 10,000BC. By comparison, Stonehenge was
built in 3,000 BC and the pyramids of Giza in 2,500 BC.

Gobekli is thus the oldest such site in the world, by a mind-numbing
margin. It is so old that it predates settled human life. It is
pre-pottery, pre-writing, pre-everything. Gobekli hails from a part of
human history that is unimaginably distant, right back in our
hunter-gatherer past.

How did cavemen build something so ambitious? Schmidt speculates that
bands of hunters would have gathered sporadically at the site, through
the decades of construction, living in animal-skin tents, slaughtering
local game for food.

The many flint arrowheads found around Gobekli support this thesis; they
also support the dating of the site.

This revelation, that Stone Age hunter-gatherers could have built
something like Gobekli, is worldchanging, for it shows that the old
hunter-gatherer life, in this region of Turkey, was far more advanced
than we ever conceived – almost unbelievably sophisticated.

The shepherd who discovered Gobekli Tepe has’ changed
everything’, said one academic

It’s as if the gods came down from heaven and built Gobekli for
themselves.

This is where we come to the biblical connection, and my own involvement
in the Gobekli Tepe story.

About three years ago, intrigued by the first scant details of the site,
I flew out to Gobekli. It was a long, wearying journey, but more than
worth it, not least as it would later provide the backdrop for a new
novel I have written.

Back then, on the day I arrived at the dig, the archaeologists were
unearthing mind-blowing artworks. As these sculptures were revealed, I
realised that I was among the first people to see them since the end of
the Ice Age.

And that’s when a tantalising possibility arose. Over glasses of black
tea, served in tents right next to the megaliths, Klaus Schmidt told me
that, in his opinion, this very spot was once the site of the biblical
Garden of Eden. More specifically, as he put it: ‘Gobekli Tepe is a
temple in Eden.’

To understand how a respected academic like Schmidt can make such a
dizzying claim, you need to know that many scholars view the Eden story
as folk-memory, or allegory.

Seen in this way, the Eden story, in Genesis, tells us of humanity’s
innocent and leisured hunter-gatherer past, when we could pluck fruit
from the trees, scoop fish from the rivers and spend the rest of our
days in pleasure.

But then we ‘fell’ into the harsher life of farming, with its ceaseless
toil and daily grind. And we know primitive farming was harsh, compared
to the relative indolence of hunting, because of the archaeological
evidence.

To date, archaeologists have dug 45 stones out of the ruins at Gobekli

When people make the transition from hunter-gathering to settled
agriculture, their skeletons change – they temporarily grow smaller and
less healthy as the human body adapts to a diet poorer in protein and a
more wearisome lifestyle. Likewise, newly domesticated animals get
scrawnier.

This begs the question, why adopt farming at all? Many theories have
been suggested – from tribal competition, to population pressures, to
the extinction of wild animal species. But Schmidt believes that the
temple of Gobekli reveals another possible cause.

‘To build such a place as this, the hunters must have joined together in
numbers. After they finished building, they probably congregated for
worship. But then they found that they couldn’t feed so many people with
regular hunting and gathering.

‘So I think they began cultivating the wild grasses on the hills.
Religion motivated people to take up farming.’

The reason such theories have special weight is that the move to farming
first happened in this same region. These rolling Anatolian plains were
the cradle of agriculture.

The world’s first farmyard pigs were domesticated at Cayonu, just 60
miles away. Sheep, cattle and goats were also first domesticated in
eastern Turkey. Worldwide wheat species descend from einkorn wheat –
first cultivated on the hills near Gobekli. Other domestic cereals –
such as rye and oats – also started here.

The stones unearthed by the shepherd turned out to be the flat
tops of T-shaped megaliths

But there was a problem for these early farmers, and it wasn’t just that
they had adopted a tougher, if ultimately more productive, lifestyle.
They also experienced an ecological crisis. These days the landscape
surrounding the eerie stones of Gobekli is arid and barren, but it was
not always thus. As the carvings on the stones show – and as
archaeological remains reveal – this was once a richly pastoral region.

There were herds of game, rivers of fish, and flocks of wildfowl; lush
green meadows were ringed by woods and wild orchards. About 10,000 years
ago, the Kurdish desert was a ‘paradisiacal place’, as Schmidt puts it.
So what destroyed the environment? The answer is Man.

As we began farming, we changed the landscape and the climate. When the
trees were chopped down, the soil leached away; all that ploughing and
reaping left the land eroded and bare. What was once an agreeable oasis
became a land of stress, toil and diminishing returns.

And so, paradise was lost. Adam the hunter was forced out of his
glorious Eden, ‘to till the earth from whence he was taken’ – as the
Bible puts it.

Of course, these theories might be dismissed as speculations. Yet there
is plenty of historical evidence to show that the writers of the Bible,
when talking of Eden, were, indeed, describing this corner of Kurdish
Turkey.

Archaeologist Klaus Schmidt poses next to some of the carvings
at Gebekli

In the Book of Genesis, it is indicated that Eden is west of Assyria.
Sure enough, this is where Gobekli is sited.

Likewise, biblical Eden is by four rivers, including the Tigris and
Euphrates. And Gobekli lies between both of these.

In ancient Assyrian texts, there is mention of a ‘Beth Eden’ – a house
of Eden. This minor kingdom was 50 miles from Gobekli Tepe.

Another book in the Old Testament talks of ‘the children of Eden which
were in Thelasar’, a town in northern Syria, near Gobekli.

The very word ‘Eden’ comes from the Sumerian for ‘plain’; Gobekli lies
on the plains of Harran.

Thus, when you put it all together, the evidence is persuasive. Gobekli
Tepe is, indeed, a ‘temple in Eden’, built by our leisured and fortunate
ancestors – people who had time to cultivate art, architecture and
complex ritual, before the traumas of agriculture ruined their
lifestyle, and devastated their paradise.

It’s a stunning and seductive idea. Yet it has a sinister epilogue.
Because the loss of paradise seems to have had a strange and darkening
effect on the human mind.

Many of Gobekli’s standing stones are inscribed with ‘bizarre
and delicate’ images, like this reptile

A few years ago, archaeologists at nearby Cayonu unearthed a hoard of
human skulls. They were found under an altar-like slab, stained with
human blood.

No one is sure, but this may be the earliest evidence for human
sacrifice: one of the most inexplicable of human behaviours and one that
could have evolved only in the face of terrible societal stress.

Experts may argue over the evidence at Cayonu. But what no one denies is
that human sacrifice took place in this region, spreading to Palestine,
Canaan and Israel.

Archaeological evidence suggests that victims were killed in huge death
pits, children were buried alive in jars, others roasted in vast bronze
bowls.

These are almost incomprehensible acts, unless you understand that the
people had learned to fear their gods, having been cast out of paradise.
So they sought to propitiate the angry heavens.

This savagery may, indeed, hold the key to one final, bewildering
mystery. The astonishing stones and friezes of Gobekli Tepe are
preserved intact for a bizarre reason.

Long ago, the site was deliberately and systematically buried in a feat
of labour every bit as remarkable as the stone carvings.

The stones of Gobekli Tepe are trying to speak to us from across
the centuries – a warning we should heed

Around 8,000 BC, the creators of Gobekli turned on their achievement and
entombed their glorious temple under thousands of tons of earth,
creating the artificial hills on which that Kurdish shepherd walked in
1994.

No one knows why Gobekli was buried. Maybe it was interred as a kind of
penance: a sacrifice to the angry gods, who had cast the hunters out of
paradise. Perhaps it was for shame at the violence and bloodshed that
the stone-worship had helped provoke.

Whatever the answer, the parallels with our own era are stark. As we
contemplate a new age of ecological turbulence, maybe the silent,
sombre, 12,000-year-old stones of Gobekli Tepe are trying to speak to
us, to warn us, as they stare across the first Eden we destroyed.

* The Genesis Secret by Tom Knox is published by Harper Collins on
March 9, priced £6.99. To order a copy (P&P free), call 0845 155 0720.

57784/Do-mysterious-stones-mark-site-Garden-Eden.h tml

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11
www.dailymail.co.uk

OSCE Ambassador Comments On Incident On Contact-Line Of NKR And Azer

OSCE AMBASSADOR COMMENTS ON INCIDENT ON CONTACT-LINE OF NKR AND AZERBAIJANI ARMED FORCES

ArmInfo
2009-03-02 11:57:00

ArmInfo. OSCE CIO Personal Representative, Ambassador Andrzej
Kasprzyk believes it difficult to say who is guilty if no one was
taken in the act of violating the ceasefire, he made this statement
when commenting on the ceasefire violation on the contact line on
February 26, ArmInfo correspondent to Stepanakert reported.

Ambassador Kasprzyk told media that at the very beginning of the
monitoring scheduled for the same day, a shot rang which suspended
the monitoring. Then another shoot rang, and guns barked. Afterwards,
another shot rang. The participants in the monitoring became witnesses
of all this, Ambassador Kasprzyk said. He could not say which party
is guilty in violating the ceasefire. Andrzej Kasprzyk said he had
mee military experts and is currently preparing a report to the
OSCE Chairman-in-Office. The Ambassador called the incident rather
serious. He is sure that soldiers on both parties fell victim to such
incidents. This is inadmissible in conditions of ceasefire, Ambassador
Kasprzyk said. He highlighted that the incident was registered despite
security guarantees given by both parties. He said the problem is
currently discussed with militaries and measures are being taken to
prevent such incidents in future.

Human Rights Condition Essentially Worsened In 2008 In Armenia, U.S.

HUMAN RIGHTS CONDITION ESSENTIALLY WORSENED IN 2008 IN ARMENIA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE REPORT READ

Noyan Tapan

F eb 27, 2009

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 27, NOYAN TAPAN. On February 25, the U.S. Department
of State published its annual report on human rights, according to
which the condition of human rights essentially worsened in 2008 in
Armenia. Radio Liberty reported this.

According to the report, the Armenian authorities and their
representatives committed many human rights violations, especially
connected with the presidential elections and suppressing the actions
of protest following them. "The authorities did not permit the citizens
to exercise their right to freely change the government, and the
citizens were arrested and imprisoned for their civil activity. The
authorities used force, sometimes with a lethal outcome, to disperse
the political actions of protest. The authorities used persecutions
and bureaucratic methods to intimidate their political opponents and
to take revenge on them. The Police beat those being under preliminary
arrest and in some cases did not provide a normal process.

The National Security Service and the Police were not punished for
their actions," the report read.

The Department of State mentioned that the February 19 presidential
elections were held in the country with considerable shortcomings,
and on March 1-2 the authorities used force to disperse the dense
crowd of demonstrants challenging the process and results of the
elections, 10 people died in consequence of the conflicts between
the demonstrants and the security forces.

Report’s section Political Prisoners and Convicts, in particular, read:
"Nearly 100 out of 150 persons arresed in the periods preceding and
following the March 1 political acts of violence were kept for rather
a long time and 100 were accused of committing crimes. Some of them
were accused of "seizing the power" or committing "mass disorders"
having wide definitions.

The authorities refute presence of political prisoners and affirm
that it was the political opposition that planned the post-electoral
acts of violence making an attempt to seize the power with violation
of the Constitution. According to the political opposition, 59
people were imprisoned in late 2008, whom the opposition considers
"political prisoners." This part of the document in detail touches
upon investigation and trials on cases filed on post-electoral events.

In the section Freedom of Expression and Press the Department of
State recorded: "Freedom of expression and press is guaranteed by
the Constitution. Nevertheless, in practice the government did not
respect these rights. Cases of violence, intimidation, self-censorship
to press continued during the whole year. This section in detail
enumerated facts of limitation of freedom of expression and press,
infringements upon journalists and media.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=1012558

Armenian Refugees Demand Their Future Be Discussed In Karabakh Talks

ARMENIAN REFUGEES DEMAND THEIR FUTURE BE DISCUSSED IN KARABAKH TALKS

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.02.2009 15:15 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian refugees from Azerbaina are the real
victims of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

"Today, on the eve of the 21st anniversary of Armenian pogroms in
Sumgait, the Armenian refugees demand that their future be discussed
in Karabakh talks," said Eleonora Asatryan, coordinator of Refugees
and International Law organizations network.

"Some 500 thousand refugees, who are scattered throughout the globe,
have the right to moral, financial and territorial compensation,"
she said.

"We have requested the NKR authorities for partial compensation and
permission to settle in the liberated territories. We have received
no response yet, but we know that official Stepanakert never minded
the idea," Mrs. Asatryan said.

The Armenian pogroms in Sumgait on February 26-29, 1988 were the
first outburst of ethnic violence in the modern soviet history.

Violence, robberies and killings resulted in flows of Armenians to
Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia.

Armenians were evicted from their houses while Azeris in Armenia were
given a possibility to sell or exchange their immovable property.

Protests Erupt After Georgia Detains Ethnic Armenians

PROTESTS ERUPT AFTER GEORGIA DETAINS ETHNIC ARMENIANS

Worldfocus
009/02/26/protests-erupt-after-georgia-detains-eth nic-armenians/4205/
Feb 25 2009

Georgia has detained two ethnic Armenians on charges of espionage. In
the past, some of the ethnic Armenians who largely populate Georgia’s
Samtskhe-Javakheti region have complained of poor treatment or gotten
into conflicts with police.

Onnik Krikorian is a freelance photojournalist and writer from the
United Kingdom based in Yerevan, Armenia. He writes at the "Frontline
Club" about attending a protest in Armenia’s capital and discusses what
the anger means for regional relations with both Georgia and Russia.

Demonstration outside Georgian Embassy

To be honest, I hadn’t particularly planned on attending today’s
demonstration staged outside the Georgian Embassy in Yerevan to protest
the detention of two ethnic Armenian activists in Georgia’s Samtskhe
Javakheti region – or rather, I was in two minds about doing so. To
begin with, a friend in town from Tbilisi told me on Saturday that the
region could hardly be considered a hotbed of separatist nationalism
seeking autonomy or unification with Armenia, a sentiment also shared
by a foreign journalist based in the Georgian capital.

True, socio-economic conditions aren’t particularly good either,
but that’s pretty much the case for most ethnic Georgian
or Azerbaijani-populated regions in the country as well as
pretty much anywhere outside the center of Yerevan, the Armenian
capital. Nevertheless, after a phone call from one of those publicizing
various other protests staged outside the Embassy informing me that
the demonstration had been rescheduled for three hours later than
originally planned, I jumped in a taxi and headed downtown.

Perhaps the main reason for going was to see how many people turned
up. My taxi driver, for example, had heard about the protest on Radio
Free Europe’s broadcast the day before and guessed why I was heading
there. However, he seemed quite concerned that blockaded by Turkey
and Azerbaijan, problems between Yerevan and Tbilisi would be the
end of Armenia. With over 70 percent of the country’s trade going
through Georgia, and still at war with Azerbaijan over the disputed
territory of Nagorno Karabakh, he had a point.

As it was, about 100 people turned up, a third of which were
reporters — an unnaturally high level of media interest for a
demonstration which could hardly attract more than 70 people mainly
from Samtskhe-Javakheti, a region populated by a little over 100,000
ethnic Armenians (54 percent of its total population). What was also
notable was that while some did hold up plackards of the two detained
activists charged with espionage, most seemed more interested in
screaming out "Javakhk," the Armenian name for the region.

Staging the demonstration in Yerevan also raises a few questions as
to why it wasn’t held in Tbilisi. Some argue that it could be for
internal political consumption a few days before the first anniversary
of the 1 March post-election clashes in the Armenian capital during
which 10 people died, or to whip up emotions among the population
which would indirectly lead to the rejection of any normalization
of ties with Turkey and a possible future settlement of the Karabakh
conflict. It could also directy lead to increased support for Russia,
already accused of stirring up trouble in Georgia.

[…]The police moved in to clear the way when Gachechiladze arrived
and the protest organizers entered the Embassy to voice their demands,
handing over a letter in Armenian which the Embassy promises to pass on
to the authorities in Tbilisi once translated into Georgian. Typically
for any demonstration in Armenia, they promised to fight until the end,
but judging from the chants and the lack of any slogans calling for the
release of the detained activists, it’s seems more likely that their
main hope was to whip up anti-Georgian sentiments among the public.

http://worldfocus.org/blog/2

Erdogan Must Normalize Relations With Armenia To Restore His Reputat

ERDOGAN MUST NORMALIZE RELATIONS WITH ARMENIA TO RESTORE HIS REPUTATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.02.2009 01:18 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s showdown
in Davos inevitably hurt bilateral relations between Turkey and
Israel. High-level officials from both sides have made harsh
statements," said Ali Bulac in his article "Fury of the Lobbies".

He mentions that to some degree, these statements are
understandable. However, when they cross the line and the parties’
attitudes and stance become harsher, the criticisms turn into
serious problems, causing unpleasant results. According to Bulac, a
recent column by David L. Phillips from The Boston Globe is one such
example. "If Erdogan wants to restore his reputation as a statesman
and a reliable partner of the West, Turkey must repair its ties with
Israel, normalize relations with Armenia, and welcome ships from
Cyprus. Becoming an advocate for Hamas is a mistake. Turkey’s future
lies with the West. The Islamist street leads away from Europe to
the Middle East," he writes.

"A country like Turkey is not afraid of such threats; it won’t consider
the threats referred to by Phillips. In fact, Erdogan’s response to
Peres in Davos should not be exaggerated. Other Arab countries have
done the same. Muammar Qaddafi described the Arab leaders as cowards
for their failure to do anything vis-a-vis the civilian massacres
in Gaza. The Algerian parliament adopted a resolution making all
diplomatic and commercial relations with Israel a crime. We also know
a lot about the initiatives of the emir of Qatar under the roof of
the UN Security Council. Iran, while displaying a balanced reaction,
never wavered in its position vis-a-vis Israel," Bulac states.

The analyst considers that Jewish lobbies in the US falsely believe
that they are strong enough to make their agenda accepted. "When it
comes to the Jewish lobbies’ threats with respect to the Armenian
issue, this is not something Turkey should be worried about. There
will be no difference between the endorsement of the claims by the US
Congress and the approval of the same allegations by parliaments of
other countries. Besides, the Jewish lobbies will be most affected by
this because they will lose the monopolistic power over the "genocide"
issue," worldbulletin.net reports.

Armenia Extends Its Opportunities Of Linking To International Commun

ARMENIA EXTENDS ITS OPPORTUNITIES OF LINKING TO INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION LINES

Noyan Tapan
Feb 20, 2009

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 20, NOYAN TAPAN. ArmenTel CJSC is at the stage
of signing an agreement on laying a new line linking Armenia to the
international fiber-optic line passing through Turkey. CNC-Alfa company
is building a fiber-optic channel in parallel with the Iran-Armenia gas
pipeline. It will connect Armenia with the international fiber-optic
line through Iran.

Fibernet’s and ArmenTel’s access lines connected with the international
communication lines passing through Georgia currently operate in
Armenia. NT correspondent was informed about it by Armen Grigorian,
Secretary of the IT Development Support Council (ITDSC), Head of the
Armenian Development Agency’s (ADA) Secretariate on IT Development
Issues.

In terms of developing the communication networks in Armenia, he
attached importance to the connection of channels of the companies
providing communication services, as well as to the start of the
process of signing agreements on conditions of the sale or exchange
of traffic. He expressed an opinion that the current situation in
this market is like "the previous situation in Armenia’s gasoline
market when gasoline was sold in cans".

In the words of A. Grigorian, there is no necessity for the state to
intervene in the market of the last mile Internet services because
the operation of other big companies (in addition to ArmenTel) in this
market has led to the fall in prices and the improvement of quality of
last mile services. "The providers raise the issue of use of penalties
against ArmenTel at ITDSC because the hi-line service provided by
ArmenTel makes competition in the "last mile" market impossible".

A. Grigorian conditioned the opportunities of further development of
Armenia’s Internet market by the fact that the third mobile operator –
Orange Armenia will start providing its services in late 2009, while
its founder – Orange company which is part of France Telecon group
has a great experience in the international market of development of
broadband Internet networks.

"As regards wireless Internet, it was announced that Armenia is among
those few countries that have a WiMax national network, but these
networks become especially efficient in mountainous areas when they
are connected to fiber-optic channels and Wi-Fi stations".

In this connection A. Grigorian underlined the importance of state
investments for creation of a powerful network of fiber-optic channels
in Armenia. This goal is reflected in the concept of Armenian IT
sector’s development approved by the government in 2008.

BAKU: OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs To Arrive In The Armenia-Azerbaijan

OSCE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS TO ARRIVE IN THE ARMENIA-AZERBAIJAN CONFLICT REGION AGAIN

Azerbaijan Business Center
Feb 18 2009
Azerbaijan

OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs for the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict
settlement may visit the region again.

Terry Davidson, the US Embassy to Azerbaijan Public Affairs Officer,
said he does not obtain information on exact terms of the visit,
but it is not excluded that the co-chairs may visit the region during
upcoming weeks.

PACE Co-Rapporteurs: Armenian Authorities Should Respect Principle O

PACE CO-RAPPORTEURS: ARMENIAN AUTHORITIES SHOULD RESPECT PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM OF GATHERINGS

Noyan Tapan
Feb 17, 2009

STRASBOURG, FEBRUARY 17, NOYAN TAPAN. PACE Co-rapporteurs on Armenia
John Prescott and George Colombier expressed concern with the
authorities’ decision not to permit the Armenian National Congress
to hold a peaceful rally in Yerevan center on March 1. PACE Yerevan
Office reported this.

J. Prescott and G. Colombier said that on various occasions
the Assembly called the authorities for completely respecting
the principle of freedom of gatherings in Armenia and not making
inappropriate limitations to opposition’s peaceful rallies, especially
in requested places. According to the Co-rapporteurs, the possibility
of all political forces to organize peaceful rallies is one of the
essential components of democracy. They call the Armenian authorities
for permitting such rallies to take place without obstacles, in the
requested places.

Four Skinheads Get Suspended Sentences For Beating Up Romas, Armenia

FOUR SKINHEADS GET SUSPENDED SENTENCES FOR BEATING UP ROMAS, ARMENIANS IN RIGA

Baltic News Service
February 17, 2009 Tuesday 3:05 PM EET

The Riga Regional Court on Tuesday handed down suspended jail sentences
to four young skinheads charged with beating up two Roma girls and
two adult Armenians in Riga two years ago.

The four youngsters who were tried for inciting national, ethnic
and racial hatred involving violence and threats in a group, pleaded
guilty to the charges.

The four accused — Aleseks Grisanovics, Artjoms Gusejinovs, Sergejs
Savins and Anatolijs Cvetkovs — each received the punishment demanded
by the prosecutor, i.e., a suspended five-year jail sentence and a
three-year probation term.

They will also have to pay compensations to the two Roma girls —
12,000 lats (EUR 17,000) to one of the girls and 8,000 lats to
the other.

The prosecutor’s office press service said that the 19-22 years old
youths have been accused of incitement of racial hatred if it is
related with violence or threat and done in a group of persons. Such
a crime carries a jail term of ten years.

The State Police in cooperation with the Security Police in February
detained a group of skinheads. The investigation showed that in the
fall of 2007 they assaulted two 14-15 years old Roma girls in Riga
due to racial motives.

According to the testimony of the mother of one of the girls at the
integration minister’s secretariat, the girls were heading to a shop,
when they met youths looking like skinheads at the tram stop. When
they returned from the shop, the youths seen at the tram stop attacked
them, kicked them into their faces and used metal objects to beat
them. Then the youths ran away.

Similar beatings took place in February this year, when the youths
with the shouts "beat the blacks" assaulted two Armenians.

In both cases assaults had been done due to racial motives.

The Security Police initially defined the crime against the girls
as hooliganism. Latvian Ombudsman’s Office claimed that the girls
were battered for their ethnic origin. Relatives of the victims also
reproached the police for passivity, not detaining the assaulters
immediately.