Yerevan Pyunik Overcomes Obstacle Of First Stage Of Tournament Of UE

YEREVAN PYUNIK OVERCOMES OBSTACLE OF FIRST STAGE OF TOURNAMENT OF UEFA’S CHAMPIONS LEAGUE

Noyan Tapan
Jul 26, 2007

YEREVAN, JULY 26, NOYAN TAPAN. Yerevan Pyunik defeated the Irish Derry
City with a record of 2:0 during the second leg of the first stage
of qualification of the tournament of the UEFA’s Champions League in
Yerevan on July 25. Arsen Avetisian and Gevorg Ghazarian scored the
two goals. The first match in Ireland ended in a draw: 0:0. With the
results of the two matches Yerevan Pyunik reached second stage where
they will compete with Donetsk Shakhtior (the Ukraine). The matches
are fixed on July 31 (in Yerevan) and on August 7 (in Donetsk).

BAKU: Karabakh Liberation Organization Charges International Organiz

KARABAKH LIBERATION ORGANIZATION CHARGES INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND RANGE OF COUNTRIES OF CHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY WITH ARMENIA

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
July 25 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku / Trend corr. S.Ilhamgizi / The Karabakh Liberation
Oarganization reported in its statement that the visit of Caroline Cox,
the Baroness and Deputy Speaker of House of Lords of Great Britain, to
Nagorno-Karabakh after its elections proved fruitless to negotiations
and to so-called ‘popular diplomacy’. Armenians attempted to hide
the facts of occupying Azerbaijani territories by prolonging their
time and using ‘popular diplomacy’.

"Agressors under the patronage of international organizations hope to
implement their objectives. International orrganizations and a range
of foreign countries should stop their support of Armenians. The
Azerbaijani Government should demand explanations from countries
and the representatives that pay visits to Nagorno-Karabakh. The
representatives of the Azerbaijani intellectuals should understand
that their visit to Nagorno-Karabakh opened the way for such people
as Caroline Cox," as was noted in the statement.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries broke out in
1988 in view of Armenia’s territorial claims to Azerbaijan. Some 20%
of Azerbaijani territory (Nagorno-Karabakh and seven nearby regions)
have been occupied by Armenian Armed Forces since 1992. In May, 1994
a ceasefire agreement was signed between the two sides. The peaceful
negotiations under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chaired
by Russia, France, and the United States are still underway.

TEHRAN: Iran Supports Solution Of Karabakh Issue Through Talks

IRAN SUPPORTS SOLUTION OF KARABAKH ISSUE THROUGH TALKS

Fars News Agency, Iran .
July 23 2007

TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- Iran has always voiced support for the
attainment of mutual understanding by the parties involved in Karabakh
issue through talks, Foreign Ministry Spokesman Seyed Mohammad Ali
Hosseini said here on Monday.

"In the same line, Iran welcomes the constructive trend of recent
talks, and specially the meeting between the presidents of the two
countries, and is prepared to extend any kind of aid and assistance
which could help to the eventual settlement of this issue," Hosseini
told reporters while stressing that Tehran recognizes the right of
national sovereignty for all countries, including Azerbaijan.

He said Iran is well informed of the fact that end of hostilities
plays an undeniable role in the establishment of peace, stability
and progress in the region, and it, thus, "extends support to any
kind of talks and negotiations between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which
would lead to an agreement between the two sides".

"We believe that the settlement of this conflict plays a significant
role in the establishment of stability and materialization of
sustainable development in the region," the spokesman concluded.

Nagornyy Karabakh Republic Leader Says Azerbaijan’s Unpredictability

NAGORNYY KARABAKH REPUBLIC LEADER SAYS AZERBAIJAN’S UNPREDICTABILITY MAKES WAR POSSIBLE

Arminfo, Yerevan
18 Jul 07

Stepanakert , 18 July: "I do not believe that there are objective
grounds for resuming hostilities in the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict
zone," the president of the Nagornyy Karabakh republic, Arkadi
Ghukasyan, told journalists today.

He said that at the moment there are no political, moral, historical
or other reasons for resuming hostilities. "Of course, none of us can
rule out the possibility of a resumption of the hostilities. We have
to deal with an unpredictable country in which words and actions are
not always consistent. Belligerent statements made by the Azerbaijani
leadership can lead to negative consequences. A war can be started
when there is an absolute confidence in success. Azerbaijan does not
have this confidence," the Nagornyy Karabakh president said.

Turkish Voters Face Choice Of Traditions, Election On Sunday Pits A

TURKISH VOTERS FACE CHOICE OF TRADITIONS, ELECTION ON SUNDAY PITS A SECULAR ELITE AGAINST A MUSLIM MAJORITY FOR CHANGE
by Sabrina Tavernise – The New York Times Media Group

The International Herald Tribune, France
July 18, 2007 Wednesday

For 84 years, modern Turkey has been defined by a holy trinity –
the army, the republic and its founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Each
was linked inextricably to the others and all were beyond reproach.

But a deep transformation is under way in this nation of 70 million
and elections on Sunday may prove a watershed: Secular liberal Turks,
once the principal political supporters of the nation’s ruling elite,
are turning their backs on it and pledging their votes to religious
politicians as well as a new array of independents.

They say they are fed up with attempts by the elite to divide Turks on
the basis of religion and that Turkey, a predominantly Muslim democracy
with a rapidly growing economy, needs to relax its controlling approach
toward its own citizens in order to become a modern democracy.

"This election is a power struggle between those who want change and
those who don’t," said Zafar Uskul, a prominent constitutional lawyer
and human rights advocate who is running with Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan’s Islamic-inspired party in southern Turkey.

"Religion is just an excuse."

"In 50 years, people will write that this was the time Turkey
started to come to terms with its own people," added Suat Kinikli,
a Canadian-educated foreign policy expert and one of about 20 secular
Turks who recently joined Erdogan’s party as it tried to appeal to
secular Turkish society.

The real threat to Turkish democracy, Kinikli and others argue, comes
not from Islamic fundamentalism, but from political meddling by the
military. Commanders have deposed elected governments four times
in Turkey’s history and threatened a fifth in April, precipitating
elections.

Now, as the election approaches, unleashing a power struggle between
the nation’s secular elite and a group of religious politicians who
draw their support from Turkey’s lower and middle classes, a vocal
new civil society may just tip the balance, and help offset the danger
of rising nationalism.

"You heat water to 99 degrees and it’s still water," said Baskin Oran,
a political science professor running as an independent candidate in
Istanbul. "You heat it one more degree and it’s not water anymore. This
one degree is the year 2007."

The current shift has its roots in the dual nature of Turkish
democracy. From its beginnings in the 1940s, a powerful chain
of bureaucrats, judges and army generals from the secular upper
classes have controlled the most sensitive affairs, while the elected
government – now held by Erdogan’s Justice and Development party –
manages more mundane aspects, much like a municipality.

But society has changed dramatically in recent decades, with religious
Turks gaining wealth and status and moving into public view. Women
in head scarves – a sight that Ataturk meant to ban from public
buildings – are in shopping malls, on motor scooters and behind the
wheels of cars.

"This narrow shirt of secularism has become a little too tight and
choking for Turkish society," said Volkan Altay, of the Turkish
Economic and Social Studies Foundation, a prominent think tank.

Ilhan Dogus, a member of the Young Civilians, an association that
opposes the military’s role in politics, said mischievously that women
in head scarves are more likely than their secular counterparts to know
that Marx refers to a German philosopher, not the British department
store Marks and Spencer.

The state elite "wanted society to fit their theory," said Recep
Senturk, a research fellow at the Center for Islamic Studies in
Istanbul. "If religion doesn’t disappear, we’ll make it disappear
because our theory says so."

Liberals like Uskul are pioneers in joining political forces with
Erdogan’s party, known by its Turkish initials, AK, which many secular
Turks consider to be too Islamic.

In Tarsus, an upper-middle-class town in southern Turkey that has
supported secular parties, Uskul, 63, was talking to lawyers Wednesday,
asking for their vote.

"Some of you might be asking, ‘What is he doing in the AK party?’ "
he said at the Tarsus Bar Association, peering earnestly through
rimless glasses and clasping his hands humbly between his knees.

"There was no other party to do what I wanted to do in Parliament.

The people who should be defending democracy are holding on to
military coups."

A woman in a black T-shirt shot back: "I wonder whether you still
have worries about AK as a threat to secularism." He replied: "My
wife has no concerns. Nor does my daughter, and you shouldn’t either."

The portion of Turkish society hanging onto the old order is shrinking,
Altay asserts, so when more than a million Turks gathered this spring
to protest what they said was creeping Islamism, bizarre combinations
were on display. People wore masks of Ataturk, who died more than 50
years ago. The music that played was from the 1930s.

"They have calcified," Oran said.

Oran estimates that parties representing that old order will get
about a quarter of the vote, largely thanks to a campaign of fear
that plays on secularism. An ad last week in Cumhuriyet, a staunchly
pro-state daily, showed a black ballot box and a woman’s eyes behind
the rectangular cut-out, evoking a facial veil. "Are you aware of
what is coming?"

Before the presidential election this spring, a television ad flashed
the years 1881 and 2007 on a black screen: The year of Ataturk’s
birth and the year his secular reforms died.

The campaign was a final straw for Turkish liberals, why say that
it distracts from Turkey’s real problems: relations with Kurds and
Armenians, differences over the island of Cyprus and European Union
membership.

A dangerous offshoot is nationalists, who play on poorer Turks’ fears
by warning that the European Union wants to tear Turkey apart. The
main nationalist party appears set to win enough votes to make it
into Parliament, supported by poorer Turks, overwhelmed by the sharp
changes in the country over the past five years.

Liberals have responded to the campaign with wit, appealing to
everybody in Turkey’s complex political landscape.

When a liberal newspaper asked for a response to the ads, Ferhat
Tumer, a 32-year-old advertising director, and his colleagues began
to brainstorm.

The result was a bubble-gum-colored two-minute cartoon in the style of
a late-night American television ad that only two Turkish television
channels were willing to air but that became a cult favorite overnight
on the Internet.

"Is thinking a crime? Speech not allowed? Is your society excluding
you, or forcing you to take sides?" the salesman-style voiceover asks
in staccato Turkish. "Move away from fragile systems that are easily
toppled. Original Democracy, adhered to by millions around the world,
is now available in Turkey!"

The short would probably not have been possible five years ago,
although Tumer and three of his colleagues had first proposed a much
more confrontational version that was a direct dig at the military.

The newspaper, Radikal, although brave, was not foolhardy.

"We believe there is a hidden group of people in Turkey who are
bored by this talk," said Tumer, fiddling with a green yo-yo at a
glass table. "We know you’re not afraid of this scarf. When she takes
it off, she still has the same ideas."

"This paranoia, this tension, for the young generation, it’s just
old-fashioned," he said.

Dogus’s group, the Young Civilians, made posters of a fictitious
presidential candidate who combines all the qualities most despised
by the elite: a Kurdish-Armenian woman in a head scarf.

Inherent in Turkey’s progress was a strange contradiction. The state
excluded religion from public life, and looked down upon religious
Turks as backward, yet when they became more integrated in public life,
condemned them as enemies of the state.

"Secular urban forces headed by the army look at these people as if
they were aliens from outer space," said Dogu Ergil, a sociology
professor at Ankara University. "But they are the products of the
very regime that left them out."

As Turkey moves ahead, it will have to grapple with where Islam
fits in the building of an equitable society. But the argument,
liberals contend, will not be over whether Islam should be part of
the government, but instead over what type of secularism fits best.

Uskul argues that Turkey’s bid for European Union membership, pushed by
Erdogan’s AK party, has set it on a course of democracy that virtually
guarantees secularism.

"The AK party is Turkey’s reality," he said, chewing a cracker at a
kebab restaurant. "Turks have to accept it. But it should proceed by
showing it’s not a threat to Turkey. I am an example of its willingness
to reform."

ANC Australia ‘Enrol To Vote’ Campaign Resumes Online

Armenian National Committee of Australia Inc.
The Peak Public Affairs Committee of the Armenian-Australian Community
259 Penshurst Street, Willoughby NSW 2068 ~ PO Box 768, Willoughby NSW 2068
Tel: (02) 9419 8264 ~ Fax: (02) 9411 8898
Email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

18 July 2007

COMPLETE, PRINT, SIGN AND SEND
ANC AUSTRALIA ‘ENROL TO VOTE’ CAMPAIGN RESUMES ONLINE

SYDNEY: The Armenian National Committee of Australia has invited all
unenrolled Armenian-Australians over 17-years-old to enrol for voting
by completing, printing, signing and sending the following form:
_NSW_0507_F.pdf.

The virtual PDF forms can be filled out online, and must then be printed,
signed by hand and posted (no stamp required) to:

Australian Electoral Commission
Reply Paid 9867
Sydney NSW 2001

These efforts are a continuation of ANC Australia’s ‘Enrol To Vote
Campaign’, which began in earnest at the 39th Annual Navasartian Games last
month and has since seen the enrolment of over 200 previously unregistered
voters; the majority of whom are members of the community’s youth.

"This campaign is all about adding voice to Armenian issues in Australia,"
explained campaign coordinator and ANC Australia Political Relations
Officer, Mr. Raymond Nazloomian. "The community has responded magnificently
to our committee’s call to show our true numbers in the lead-up to the
Federal Election later this year."

In the upcoming elections, the Armenian-Australian community is expected to
hold the balance of power in Prime Minister John Howard’s marginal seat of
Bennelong.

"By the end of this campaign, Armenian-Australians will represent
approximately 5% of Bennelong’s voting populace," added Mr. Nazloomian.

The Armenian-Australian community also represents significant numbers in
Western Sydney, the Northern Beaches and the North Shore in New South Wales,
as well as the South-East of Melbourne in Victoria.

Mr. Nazloomian stated: "ANC Australia will present our community’s issues to
all candidates from Armenian-populated areas in the lead-up to the
elections and will publicise their responses in an effort to guide the
Armenian-Australian vote."

Visit to remain updated with the ‘Enrol to Vote Campaign’ and
other activities of the Armenian-Australian community’s peak public affairs
committee.

[end]

Contact: Haig Kayserian
Communications Officer
P: 0403 317 903
E: [email protected]

The Armenian National Committee of Australia is the peak public affairs body
of the Armenian-Australian community. ANC Australia advances the concerns of
the Armenian-Australian community.

http://aec.gov.au/pdf/enrolment/forms/ER016w
www.anc.org.au

Those Turks, They Are Relentless!

THOSE TURKS, THEY ARE RELENTLESS!
George Gregoriou Professor, Critical Theory and Geopolitics

Greek News, New York
me=News&file=article&sid=7159
July 16 2007

It is 33 years since Turkey invaded Cyprus and carried out their
ethnic cleansing in the north. Nothing seems to change in Ankara.

Ankara gets away with, literally, murder. Does it have anything to do
with the Muslim religion? It does. Ayaan Hirsi Ali offers a partial
explanation. In her words: "Islam stopped thinking in the year 900 and
has stood still for more than a thousand years." For over 100 years,
the authorities in Constantinople and Ankara denied they committed
genocide against the Armenians, much less on all Christian subjects. I
do not mean 1915 or 1922, the massacre of 1,500,000 Armenians and the
burning of Smyrna and the genocide of the Greeks, respectively. The
deportations and massacres against the Christian subjects was part
of the policy of the Ottoman rulers to Turkify Anatolia. This policy
was accelerated, with vengeance, from the last quarter of the 19th
Century to the end of World War I, when the Empire was rotting from
inside and assaulted from the outside by the European imperialist
powers. The end of the Ottoman Empire was in sight. It collapsed with
the outbreak of the Great War.

The evidence on the deportations and massacres is overwhelming. It
was more than one can handle. Turkish intellectuals admit there was a
genocide. They relied on the Ottoman documents, already declassified by
Ankara. Newspaper reporting on the massacres, in the United States and
Europe, abound. So are eyewitness reports by government officials,
American, European, including Germans who coached the Turks on
genocide. This evidence came out at the trials in Constantinople when
the Ottoman capital was occupied by the Allied forces during World War
I. The skulls and skeletons of the victims still surface at the mass
graves. Yet, despite this evidence, the Turkish authorities still say
"Yok," It Did Not Happen!

It is the same on Cyprus. What occupation? What ethnic cleansing? All
traces of Greek history in the occupied north have been eradicated,
from cemeteries to streets to villages and towns. 200 thousand Greek
Cypriots were forced to leave their homes to "make room" for 140,000
settlers from Anatolia. They occupy Greek Cypriot homes, with Ecevit
photographs on bureaus, even take title of stolen property. This is not
true, it is Greek Cypriot propaganda! The bulldozing of Greek Cypriot
homes is daily, mostly for developers from the USA and EU countries,
with Washington encouragement. No, that cannot be true!

Ankara and Washington are masters of denial. And after 33 years of
occupation, even opening the barbed wire gates between the north
and the south for reconciliation, the only solution at the table
(promoted by Ankara, London, and Washington through the UN) is a
legalized partition or a two-state solution.

Why are the Turkish leaders in Ankara so arrogant, even lying in
the face of all the evidence on the genocide and the invasion and
occupation of Cyprus? Why do they get away with these lies? They are
not about to change, denunciations and protestations aside, unless
necessity knocks at their door, at least not by themselves. The
reason? The Turkish rulers, with mass support, are not only arrogant,
they have power to support this arrogance. The are also located at
a strategic place. The major powers in Europe and the US are with
Turkey, as enablers of these lies, thereby perpetuating Ankara¹s
arrogance and denials.

The deportations and massacres in the Ottoman era were well-known.

Americans and Europeans organized, protested, even pressured their
governments to set up commissions to look into these massacres
and take action. That is as far as it went. With the resurgence
of the nationalist movement, led by Mustafa Kemal, the political
tide favored Turkey. He was a competent strategist. His flirting
with the Russian Bolsheviks, for loans and arms, send shivers down
the spines of the capitalists. Though allied warships escorted the
Greek military expedition to Smyrna, they abandoned them. One by one,
the European leaders (Italy, France, Britain) and the United States,
came to terms with Mustafa Kemal and signed peace treaties. Something
else happened. The British did smell oil in Baku (Mesopotamia)
and the Middle East. The Americans would not be left out, since
oil was essential to industrial capitalism. They rushed to sign oil
concessions from the Turks, for billions of dollars in profits. And
voila, a new pro-Turkish policy was borne: the sworn wartime enemy of
the allies was the new ally! What human rights? What humanity? What
genocide? All these platitudes in wartime went out of the window.

This situation continued into the Cold War, the war on terrorism,
and the emerging "Cold War II" against Russia. Turkey is important
in these wars. Cyprus is not.

We cannot hold our breath forever. We have been doing this for 33
years. Any results? Nothing will be done unless this geopolitical
strategy is in danger. We have to stop this isolation. Washington¹s
pro-Turkish policy can be fractured only if the Cyprus problem
becomes part of the larger movement to force Ankara to recognize the
genocide against Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians (and Kurds) and get out
of Cyprus. Otherwise, Turkey will not be in the European Union. This
wind is already blowing in that direction throughout Europe. Sooner
or later Turkey will have to choose between the European Union or
an Islamic path. The present situation cannot last forever. Either
way, Turkey moving towards democracy or the Islamic path will be in
trouble. So would the United States-Turkey axis. For the Greeks,
doing the same thing over and over for 33 years, without results,
is the mark of insanity. Turkey has been denying the genocide for
100 years and occupying northern Cyprus for 33 years, to her advantage.

This cannot be done forever! When the stakes are raised to a higher
level, when Turkey is threatened to fall off its perch, and the
"marriage of convenience" between the United States and Turkey is
on the verge of collapse, we may see some movement on the genocide
denial and the occupation of Cyprus. Imagine such a threat to US
interests in the Muslim world. Iraq may be the beginning of a much
greater disaster waiting to happen. Washington cannot hold the hand
of Ankara at the doorsteps of the EU in Brussels much longer.

–Boundary_(ID_thLYwM0GcgNlMqosypQngQ)–

http://www.greeknewsonline.com/modules.php?na

Where Money Seems To Talk

WHERE MONEY SEEMS TO TALK

The Economist
Jul 12th 2007

EVERY summer, the world has its temperature taken twice–once by
climate scientists, literally; a second time by opinion pollsters,
metaphorically.

This year two new surveys have thrown up a lot of fresh data on how
the world really feels. And they have, so the pollsters say, cast
some unexpected light on the link between wealth and happiness.

Ever since social scientists at the University of Pennsylvania found
that mansion-dwelling American millionaires are barely happier than
Masai warriors in huts, some economists have been downplaying the link
between cash and contentment. In a 2005 book, Richard Layard, a British
scholar, said family circumstances, employment and health all mattered
more to a sense of well-being than income. Rich countries might be
happier than poor ones, but beyond a threshold, the connection weakens,
and more cash would not buy more happiness–so the theory goes.

The new polls cast some doubt on that school of thought. They add
weight to the contention that growth and income play a big part
in boosting people’s satisfaction with life and their attitude to
the future.

One of these surveys claims to be the first genuinely global opinion
poll.

Called World Poll, and conducted by the Gallup organisation, it spans
130 countries, many of which are being polled for the first time. Other
surveys are smaller. The respected Global Attitudes Survey of the
Pew Research Centre, an offshoot of an American charity, operates
annually in just over 50 countries. The World Values Survey run from
the University of Michigan is more comprehensive (over 80 countries),
but updated only once in five years.

Gallup’s pollsters asked a standard question: how satisfied are you
with your life, on a scale of nought to ten? In all the rich places
(America, Europe, Japan, Saudi Arabia), most people say they are
happy. In all the poor ones (mainly in Africa), people say they are
not. As Angus Deaton of Princeton University puts it, a map of the
results looks like an income plot of the world (see map). There
are some exceptions: Georgia and Armenia, though not among the
world’s poorest states, are among the 20 most miserable. Costa Rica
and Venezuela, though middle-income countries, are among the 20
happiest. The Brazilians, pictured above, seem a bit more cheerful
than their income level justifies.

But in general, declared levels of happiness are correlated with
wealth. The pattern also seems to hold true within countries, as well
as between them.

Rich Americans are happier than poor ones; rich Brazilians happier
than poorer ones.

The other new survey, by Ipsos, confirms the picture. Top of its
list of 20 countries ranged by happiness is the rich Netherlands
(with Gallup, it is Finland); China is bottom. The survey also asked
questions about confidence in the future, whether your children will
be better off than you are, and so on. Regardless of countries’ current
income, there was a close correlation between GDP growth and optimism,
with China, India and Russia most optimistic; France, Germany and
Italy were the least. If both polls are right, the Chinese are pretty
miserable now but they expect a dramatic turn for the better.

The Ipsos poll is not strictly comparable to Gallup’s because (for the
first time) it asks questions of what Ipsos calls "leaders and shapers
of public opinion", mostly business people and politicians. This
group has distinctive views–it takes a loftier view than the general
population (see table). The gap between elite and popular perceptions
is especially sharp in Russia, India and China. In those countries,
top people’s attitudes are far more upbeat than those of the general
population. In Europe and America, the attitudes of the elite are
roughly in line with–or slightly more pessimistic than–society as
a whole.

In fairness, the "new happiness" economists, such as Mr Layard, never
claimed there was no connection at all between money and feeling good.

What they have said is that once people climb out of poverty, the link
is weak, and may not work at all above a certain point (as one British
pundit put it, extra money "is now proved beyond doubt not to deliver
greater happiness, nationally or individually"). The evidence for this
comes from surveys in most rich countries (such as America’s general
social survey), which show that happiness has been flat for decades,
even though incomes have risen sharply.

On the face of it, the new findings are a counter-point to the
earlier data.

If the richest countries report greater "happiness" than moderately
rich ones, that would suggest there is no quantifiable level of
income at which extra cash fails to deliver extra contentment. Still,
the latest findings don’t invalidate the historic experience of
particular countries–like the United States–which have surged to
greater levels of wealth without experiencing any rise in general
levels of reported happiness.

But if you treat history as bunk and concentrate on the levels of
satisfaction that countries feel right now, the results are–in Mr
Deaton’s view–quite striking. He has compared Gallup’s satisfaction
score with national income based on purchasing-power parities, and
got a close fit.

So what should one make of the contradiction between these surveys
and previous evidence? Definitional problems may provide part of the
explanation. These are self-reported polls and people mean different
things by "happiness". Cultural problems are likely to be much greater
when 130 states are involved.

Another possibility is that "happiness" is really a proxy for something
else, such as health. Perhaps the main point is that money mitigates
poor health, so the rich are happier than the poor mainly because they
feel healthier. But that cannot be the whole story. More than half the
20 countries with the lowest level of satisfaction with health are in
the ex-Soviet Union or eastern Europe though in statistical terms they
seem relatively well off. In contrast, much poorer African countries
(with a far higher incidence of HIV/AIDS and other diseases) express
higher levels of health satisfaction. Expectations, or memories, may
be at work: medical woes in an ex-communist state feel worse because
people recall, albeit through rose-tinted spectacles, an era of full
health coverage.

Lastly, as the Ipsos poll clearly shows, happiness and optimism are not
just different, they can be contradictory. The Chinese are dissatisfied
but upbeat; Europeans are happy now but dread tomorrow. Many links
between happiness, income and optimism have yet to be teased out. This
new data–though not the last word on the subject–should help.

Assembly Hails Record Support For Armenian Genocide Resolution

ASSEMBLY HAILS RECORD SUPPORT FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

Lragir.am
12-07-2007 15:43:36

Washington, DC – The Armenian Assembly announced today that
the Armenian Genocide resolution (H. Res.106) achieved a major
milestone by garnering the support of a bipartisan majority in the
House of Representatives. With the addition of Representatives Donna
Christensen (D-VI) and John Yarmuth (D-KY), H. Res. 106 now has 218
cosponsors. Along with the resolution’s sponsor, Congressman Adam
Schiff (D-CA), the bill has a total of 219 supporters (this number
takes into account two Members of Congress that are still technically
listed as cosponsors, one of whom has since passed away and another
who resigned from Congress.)

"With the threshold of 218 cosponsors having been reached, it is clear
that a majority of the House supports recognition of the historical
fact of the Genocide," Schiff told the Assembly. "Affirmation and
re-affirmation of the Armenian Genocide remains a compelling human
rights issue, and I hope that our majority support will prompt early
passage of the resolution."

"Only by remembering and learning from the past, can we hope to
prevent future atrocities," Schiff continued.

H. Res. 106, which was introduced in late January, calls upon the
President to "ensure that the foreign policy of the United States
reflects appropriate understanding" of the "Armenian Genocide" and to
"accurately characterize the systematic and deliberate annihilation
of 1,500,000 Armenians as genocide," in the President’s annual message.

Passage of the legislation would reaffirm the U.S. historical record
which includes thousands of pages documenting the premeditated
extermination of the Armenian people. American intervention prevented
the full realization of Ottoman Turkey’s genocidal plan, while the
first major U.S. humanitarian assistance effort provided much needed
relief to those who survived.

"The Armenian Genocide resolution has reached a record level of
bipartisan support, proving that despite the intense lobbying efforts
by those who seek to deny the truth, the momentum continues to grow
for reaffirmation of the historical truth," said Board of Trustees
Chairman Hirair Hovnanian.

"We are pleased by this record level of support which once again
proves that there are sufficient votes in the House to pass this
resolution," said Reps. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg
(R-MI), co-chairs of the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues. "We
will continue to work with the members of the Armenian Caucus,
the cosponsors, and with the leadership of both parties to secure a
concluding, affirming vote on this legislative measure. U.S. clarity
on this fact of world history is of critical importance and long
past due."

"We are getting exceedingly closer to our goal of passing the Armenian
Genocide resolution and properly recognizing this historic tragedy,"
said Congressman George Radanovich (R-CA). "This recognition is
especially poignant given the tragedies occurring today in Darfur."

Executive Director Bryan Ardouny praised Assembly supporters and
activists, as well as the entire Armenian-American community for
reaching out to their elected officials. "Having crossed this important
threshold, we will continue our advocacy efforts to secure a vote and
successful passage of this critical human rights legislation. We are
encouraged by the groundswell of support – both inside and outside
of Congress."

"In addition to the strong bipartisan support of the Members of
Congress and grassroots activism, there are also some 50 diverse
organizations and human rights groups that also support H.Res.106,"
Ardouny continued [see complete list below].

Ardouny also encouraged activists to continue their advocacy efforts,
explaining that "the greater the number of cosponsors, the greater
our chances the legislation will be brought to the House floor."

H. Res. 106 is currently pending before the House Foreign Affairs
Committee, of which Tom Lantos (D-CA) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)
serve as the Chair and Ranking Member. Both Lantos and Ros-Lehtinen
voted in favor of an identical resolution (H. Res. 316) before the
Committee last Congress.