Citizenship of CSTO Gen.-Sec. will have no impact on decisions being either pro or anti-Armenian

Citizenship of CSTO Gen.-Sec. will have no impact on decisions being either pro or anti- Armenian

Save

Share

18:31,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 12, ARMENPRESS. Narrow-format discussions have taken place between the CSTO member states over the issue of the appointment of a new Secretary-General of the organization, ARMENPRESS reports acting Defense Minister of Armenia David Tonoyan told the reporters during a press conference at the ministry.

“I advise everyone to wait until December 6. The discussions took place in a narrow format, the details of which are not available. A decision was made to discuss the issue of the secretary general on December 6”, David Tonoyan said.

The acting minister noted that the CSTO Secretary-General is an international post and his citizenship does not impact on making decisions being either pro or anti-Armenian.

“1.5 years still remain for us to occupy that post, but the CSTO Secretary-General is an international post and it in no way impacts on making decisions being either pro or anti-Armenian and the citizenship of the Secretary General does not matter”, he said. C

CSTO members states are Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan.

Yuri Khachaturov was relieved from the post of the CSTO Secretary General on November 2 at the initiative of the Armenian side. Charges are pressed against him over March 1 case. Deputy Secretary General of the CSTO Valery Semerikov is now the acting Secretary General of the organization.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan




168: Mkhitaryan named Man of the Match in Arsenal-Sporting

Category
Sport

Armenia’s Henrikh Mkhitaryan, the midfielder of London’s Arsenal, has been named Man of the Match of the Arsenal – Sporting Europa League match that ended 0:0.

Gunners forward Danny Welbeck has suffered a “very big injury” after he was carried off on a stretcher during his side’s Europa League game against Sporting Lisbon on Thursday, BBC reported.

Arsenal secured a place in the last 32.

“He is at the hospital. The news is that we are going to wait, but we think it’s a serious injury,” said Arsenal boss Unai Emery.

Welbeck was hurt in the 25th minute when he jumped for a header and landed badly on his right ankle.

Some of Welbeck’s team-mates were also visibly affected by the incident.

“They saw it was a big injury,” added Emery.

Armenian Assembly National Advocacy Conference Features Exclusive First-Looks for Attendees

ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: November 5, 2018

Contact: Danielle Saroyan

Telephone: (202) 393-3434

Web: www.aaainc.org

 

ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY NATIONAL ADVOCACY CONFERENCE FEATURES EXCLUSIVE
FIRST-LOOKS FOR ATTENDEES

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Attendees of the
Armenian Assembly of America (Assembly) National Advocacy Conference were
treated to a sneak preview about the results from the Smithsonian Folklife
Festival as well as a special presentation about American humanitarian
intervention in Armenia’s first republic.

 

SNEAK PREVIEW
INTO 2018 SMITHSONIAN FOLKLIFE FESTIVAL RESULTS

 

Luncheon speaker Smithsonian Director of Special Projects Halle
Butvin made a special presentation on the 2018 Smithsonian Folklife Festival
which presented “Armenia: Creating Home.” She shared remarks and
insights about this historic Festival that brought Armenian culture and
tradition to our nation’s capital, which is considered the most widely attended
in recent years.

 

“The two weeks of the Festival were packed – we normally
worry about thunderstorms and rain, but this year it was all sun – so much so
that most of the time there was a heat advisory. That didn’t stop the 738,000
people who came to the Mall to learn about Armenian culture. Staff who have
worked on the Festival for their entire career commented on the powerful
presence of Armenian Americans. Within the site, you could hear Eastern and
Western Armenian spoken everywhere, and every day we encountered extended
families who used the Festival as an opportunity for a reunion,” Butvin
said.

 

Butvin was the curator for the Festival, and shared stories of her
experiences traveling back and forth from Armenia over the past couple of
years, and how welcomed she felt during her trips. This warmth continued at the
Folklife Festival, and she told the attendees anecdotes of her memorable
interactions with the Festival participants. Butvin concluded her presentation
with an exclusive first-look video that has not yet been released, comprised of
interviews from the Armenian participants and what the 2018 Folklife Festival
meant to them.

 

“Throughout the Festival, we heard so much positive feedback,
both from participants and visitors, and our team is in the process of
finalizing a report on its impact. My co-curators are, as we speak, visiting
with festival participants to learn from them about their experience, the new
relationships made, and what they’ll carry forth as a result of being a part of
this momentous occasion,” she added.

 

AMERICAN
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE DURING FIRST REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA REMEMBERED

 

Another feature presentation was made by Armenian National
Institute (ANI) Director Dr. Rouben Adalian, who introduced his digital exhibit
on the role of the YMCA and American relief work during the first republic of
Armenia (1918-1920). The exhibit explores the role of two exceptional
individuals, John Elder and James O. Arroll, who volunteered to stay in Armenia
during the critical year of 1918 when fellow American relief workers were
withdrawn in view of the intensification of warfare in the region.

 

Dr. Adalian went into further detail about the American volunteers
throughout the past century in Armenia, starting with the YMCA volunteers,
recalling the relief workers who hastened to Armenia after the December 1988
earthquake, and continuing with those in the Peace Corps today.

 

“The United States and Armenia have a 100 year relationship.
It’s the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Republic, and the United States was
there from the very first year, helping the Armenian people,” he said.
“The United States has been doing so much more for Armenia than these one
or two occasional episodes of humanitarian intervention.”

 

The exhibit was on display in Yerevan this past summer, which was
visited by U.S. Ambassador Richard Mills, and is currently in Artsakh being
presented by the YMCA in Stepanakert.

 

“Two years ago, a granddaughter of John Elder sent me a
photograph, and hence, started a conversation with Elder’s family. Out of that
grew a continuing discussion. Today, we have the evidence – photographs and
diary entries – of what John Elder experienced in Armenia with the Genocide
survivors,” Dr. Adalian said.

 

Discovered the morning of the Advocacy Conference, Dr. Adalian
shared with the attendees a never-before-seen gift to John Elder by the
Armenian people a hundred years ago.

 

Established in 1972, the Armenian Assembly of America is the
largest Washington-based nationwide organization promoting public understanding
and awareness of Armenian issues. The Assembly is a non-partisan, 501(c)(3)
tax-exempt membership organization.

 

###

 

NR#: 2018-049

 

Photo Caption 1: Attendees at Armenian Assembly of America’s 2018
National Advocacy Conference

Photo Caption 2: Smithsonian Director of Special Projects Halle
Butvin at the Armenian Assembly 2018 National Advocacy Conference

Photo Caption 3: Armenian National Institute (ANI) Director Dr.
Rouben Adalian at the Armenian Assembly’s 2018 National Advocacy Conference

 

Available online: 


Adalian 2.jpg

JPEG image


Halle Butvin Smithsonian.jpg

JPEG image


Advocacy crowd.jpg

JPEG image

ACNIS reView

Editorial
OCTOBER 13, 2018

NA elections, fraught with a new parliamentary crisis
What are the parliamentary elections for and what does the government system formed by proportional elections imply?
It means that the power in RA belongs to the parties that present ways of development, and the society either approves their proposals or not. Whoever gets the most “YES” rules the country for the next 5 years, the rest criticize. In any case, that is the meaning of the elections: the National Assembly elections are considered a weighty measure of the processes taking place in the society.
Now, keeping this simple scheme in mind, let’s try to understand what the situation is in Armenia.
The former usurped the power and used the country’s resources for their narrow group interests. At one time, Serzh Sargsyan aptly called the ruling group a gang. That was the content and meaning of banditry. With the April 2016 four-day war, the government lost the last shred of legitimacy, it could not even provide security. The Armenian army armed with “weapons of the 80s” was an assessment of the effectiveness of the management system. It was the beginning of the end. The end came in April of this year.
Since 1991, Armenian society has had one main dream: a change of power. That dream came true, but the solution to the main problems facing society and the country remained uncertain. Let’s remind that according to the governance model of Armenia, the parties should propose the solutions, and the right to choose between them belongs to the people.
National Assembly elections will be held in the coming months. The most important issue is what the newly elected deputies will talk about in the new parliament, the “speaking place”, so that it will be of interest to the public.
In Armenia, the power belongs to the parties, and there is no president elected by national elections who can guarantee stability in emergency situations. However, the party field has collapsed. It implies a serious political and state crisis. There are no trust-inspiring parties, and there are no projects for the future.
The cycle was closed on one person, around whom different people gathered with different goals. “KP” will follow the path of ANM and RPA, because like them it was built in the core of the government and for the sake of the government. In the conditions of a political crisis, we will not choose a political development plan, but we will choose a person who has not yet proposed his plan to the public and, naturally, the people gathered around him did not come together for that non-existent idea and non-existent plan. This will be an election with closed eyes, that is, we will vote in the absence of a choice. many for Hope, a few for more tangible reasons.
Parliamentarianism is a state management system where power is separated into legislative and executive bodies, where the actual acting prime minister will make a list at his discretion, and no one doubts that this list will form an absolute majority in the parliament. This already contradicts the spirit of parliamentarism, and the championship will belong not to the legislature, but to the executive body.
The intrigue of the situation is that if parties with public trust are formed, we will again have a parliamentary crisis, because the real parties will remain outside the parliament, and the governing nomenclature will be represented inside. In fact, the main political processes will take place again in the street, which may again lead to a “change in the situation” and a new parliamentary crisis.

Asbarez: Portantino Discusses His Recent Trip to Armenia, Artsakh

California State Senator Anthony Portantino recently returned from a trip to Armenia and Artsakh. He was part of a delegation of California State legislators and representatives of technology companies visiting Armenia organized by the Armenian National Committee-Western Region.

On October 2, Portantino sat down with Asbarez Editor Ara Khachatourian for a Horizon Live interview, during which the senator explained the importance of having tech-sector representatives on the trip given Armenia’s burgeoning IT sector. He also discussed his efforts to explore cooperation with Artsakh in agricultural development.

How Charles Aznavour changed music forever

France 24
Oct 5 2018

    © AFP | Charles Aznavour reinvented popular music one cold December night in Paris in 1960

    PARIS (AFP) – 

    Play
    Current Time0:00
    /
    Duration Time0:04
    Loaded: 0%
    Progress: 0%
    0:00
    Fullscreen
    00:00
    Mute

    Charles Aznavour reinvented popular music one cold December night in Paris in 1960.

    “He just blew my brains out,” said Bob Dylan of the first time he witnessed the French singer’s style of delivery a little over two years later.

    That concert has since gone down as one of the greatest ever at New York’s Carnegie Hall.

    Yet that night in Paris when a nervy Aznavour — who died Monday aged 94 — stepped out on stage to change the way songs were sung forever, his career was on the skids.

    Unloved at home and utterly unknown abroad, he was at the end of his tether.

    He had pulled out all the stops to fill the Alhambra concert hall in one final bid to win over the public.

    But the critics had come to bury not to praise him.

    The little Armenian who had written songs for Edith Piaf, and spent years as her bag carrier, was going nowhere, stuck as the “ugly duckling” of the cabaret circuit without any kind of hit for four years.

    Yet it was — irony of ironies — a song he wrote about a desperate provincial crooner dreaming of fame, “Je m’voyais deja” (It Will Be My Day), that finally launched Aznavour to stardom.

    Yves Montand, the actor and singer, had earlier turned it down, saying “songs about show business never work”.

    But that night at the Alhambra, Aznavour did not just sing the song, he turned it into “a one-act play” about the poor crooner’s life, acting out him dressing to go on stage.

    – ‘He was revolutionary’ –

    And with the song’s last prophetic line, “But a day will come/ When I will show them I have the talent”, Aznavour brought the house down.

    The man who begun performing at five finally found his mojo at 36.

    His biographer Bertrand Dicale said “Aznavour was a revolutionary. He changed everything: the way songs were written, the themes a song could tackle, the way they could be performed.”

    Never good-looking — Piaf badgered him to get a nose job, then told him it was horrible — he was by then balding and prematurely aged.

    But even as doors closed in his face, he was rebuilding himself from the best of his heroes. “My four points of reference were “Edith Piaf, Charles Trenet, (the Russian acting guru) Konstantin Stanislavski and Maurice Chevalier,” he told AFP last year, adding that Bing Crosby, Mel Torme and Frank Sinatra were also in the mix.

    “He stole his famous bar stool routine from Sinatra,” said Dicale. “And that way he had of telling stories between songs was inspired by Sinatra’s Las Vegas shows.”

    “I had done classical dance, variety and theatre, and I wanted to get all that into my performances,” Aznavour, who will be buried on Saturday, told AFP.

    – ‘He put his guts into it’ –

    “I said to myself that if I put them all in I would find my own style. And I did, it became ‘Aznavour’,” said the singer born Shahnour Varinag Aznavourian to parents fleeing the massacres of Armenians as the Ottoman empire collapsed.

    “He broke all the rules of his era when singers had to be really good looking,” said the French songwriter Calogero. “But he had this incredible personality.”

    For the rapper MC Solaar “you can see the feeling with Aznavour. He wanted to move people, we are far beyond just singing with him,” he added.

    Dicale added that Aznavour really became the characters in the songs, “really putting his guts into it”.

    That is what impressed his peers, the writer said, and what won him the hearts of audiences across the world.

    “Just seeing what he did on stage at his age gives me the courage to continue,” said the rapper Soprano, one of several hip-hop stars including Dr Dre and Sean Paul who have covered or sampled Aznavour.

    “Lots of singers have a bit of Aznavour in them,” said Dicale, from “Brazilians like Caetano Veloso and Chico Buarque to… Elton John and Sting who at 19 or 20 discovered Aznavour” and have never ceased to be fans.

    Yerevan election: 79,686 people cast votes as of 11:00

    Category
    Politics

    79,686 people, or 9,39% of the total number of voters, have cast ballots as of 11:00 in the Yerevan City Council election, the central electoral commission said.

    848,343 people are eligible to vote in the election. Polling stations will be open until 20:00.

    Top officials visit Yerablur military cemetery on Independence Day

    ArmenPress, Armenia
    Sept 21 2018
    Top officials visit Yerablur military cemetery on Independence Day


    YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. Top officials of Armenia visited the Yerablur military cemetery today on the occasion of Independence Day.

    Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, President Armen Sarkissian, Artsakh’s President Bako Sahakyan and Catholicos Garegin II visited the pantheon.

    The officials laid flowers to the graves of Sparapet Vazgen Sargsyan, Andranik Ozanyan, and a wreath at the memorial dedicated to fallen soldiers.

    The Catholicos delivered a prayer.

    Today, the Third Republic of Armenia is celebrating its 27th anniversary of Independence.

    27 years ago the Armenian people said its decisive “yes” through a referendum to declare independence.

    99,5% of voters voted in favor of Armenia being a democratic independent state outside the USSR. Two days later, on September 23rd, the Supreme Council declared Armenia an independent, sovereign republic.

    The declaration of the newly independent Armenia gave the start of the Third Republic of Armenia’s history. For 27 years already, the bearers of the Armenian statehood are the people of Armenia.

    The first Constitution of the third republic was adopted on July 5, 1995 through a referendum.

    The active Constitution was adopted in November, 2015, again through a referendum.

    September 21st is a day of national pride. The centuries-old dream of the Armenian people of having an independent country is reality for already 27 years.

    Numerous celebrations and festive events are expected to take place today in the country.

    Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan

    Artsakh says line of contact situation is ‘stable-calm’

    Categories
    Artsakh
    Region

    Artsakh’s defense minister Levon Mnatsakanyan says the situation in the Karabakh-Azerbaijan line of contact is “stable-calm”.

    Speaking to reports at the Presidential residence in Yerevan, he said that certain ceasefire violations take place by Azerbaijan, but these breaches are mostly small arms fire.

    “It can be said that there are no violations from large caliber weapons. We are working to give responses to these violations if required. We don’t respond to every single shot. In this regard, whenever we see a necessity that’s only when we respond,” he said.

    He said that they have sufficient arsenal to give adequate response to the adversary. “We have all necessary means for various actions and solution of different tasks. Our arsenal is always supplemented with new types in terms of both quantity and quality,” he said.

    Russia is not interested in Armenia’s withdrawal from the zone of its influence

    Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
     Monday
    Russia is not interested in Armenia's withdrawal from the zone of its influence
     ASTNA.biz
    - What can you say about the outcome of the meeting between the Prime
    Minister of Armenia and the President of Russia?
    -The meeting once again confirmed that Russia does not want the
    accelerated withdrawal of Armenia from its control. Even before the
    meeting, the Armenian President said that "it would be naive to expect
    any result from this meeting." Indeed, it was hardly worth expecting
    Russia to offer Armenia a new roadmap. On the other hand, Armenia is
    not in a position to completely move away from Russia. During this
    meeting, the existing projects between Russia and Armenia were more
    affected.
    The talk is the supply of the Russian gas to Armenia, the
    participation of the Russian Federation in the modernization of the
    Hrazdan nuclear power plant, the growth of investments by Russian
    entrepreneurs in the Armenian economy.
    Naturally, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was also discussed. The
    Russian side called on Armenia to make compromises.
    Pashinyan's answer to Putin "To compromise before the threats of
    Azerbaijan would look like our weakness" was in fact an attempt to
    move the arrows in the other direction.
    In fact, Russia has made sure that the Armenian Armed Forces will take
    part in the humanitarian mission in Syria. This should be understood
    as compelling Russia to again operate in Armenia within its own
    interests.
    After Pashinyan"s coming to power in Armenia, the relations between
    Yerevan and Moscow became somewhat colder. Therefore, it was expected
    that the meeting between Pashinyan and Putin would take place in a
    tense atmosphere. However, after the meeting, Pashinyan said that the
    talks were held in normal conditions. Is it possible that tension
    between the two countries has already been eliminated, or is Pashinyan
    maneuvering with Moscow on the eve of early parliamentary elections,
    which he wants to lead temporarily?
    - In reality, it was inevitable that Pashinyan would be in a tense
    state at the meeting.
    -His forced release of Robert Kocharyan and suspension of the CSTO
    Secretary General's persecution testifies that he is preparing for a
    visit to Moscow with a relaxed position. Neither the Russian press,
    nor the Armenian media either wrote that either Pashinyan had shown
    some kind of tough stance in the negotiations with Putin. Pashinyan's
    only message was: "Do not interfere in the internal affairs of
    Armenia." And this is a normal call, and any head of state makes such
    statements when there is interference in his state. Therefore, this
    meeting did not change anything. At this meeting, there was no trace
    of aggressive anti-Russian statements that sounded inside Armenia.
    - Azerbaijan expected the results of this meeting because of the
    Karabakh conflict. When Russia's relations with Pashinyan's government
    cooled, Moscow made statements that met the interests of Azerbaijan.
    The ideas of the return of the occupied lands were often heard. Moscow
    and Yerevan reconciled, does it mean that such talks will decrease?
    - The talks that Azerbaijan expected something special from this
    meeting were an invention of our press. The leadership of Azerbaijan
    did not expect anything new from this meeting. Our press wrote that
    Putin allegedly will discuss with Pashinyan the issue of Azerbaijan's
    joining the CSTO. However, Azerbaijani officials did not say anything
    like that. Moreover, during his visit to Croatia, the President
    (Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev) announced Azerbaijan's intention to expand
    cooperation with NATO. As for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, nothing
    new has been discussed either. If it was discussed, but nothing
    significant.
    Because of Putin's lack of a plan proposing something new to resolve
    the conflict, it is not clear that he could discuss with Armenia in
    this direction. The maximum that he could offer is to come to a common
    compromise, agreement in negotiations with Azerbaijan. For Putin, the
    main thing is that the parties do not lose the potential for
    negotiations, they do not go to confrontation, they would not
    undermine the stable period of the South Caucasus policy of Russia.
    - In early September, the Presidents of Azerbaijan and Russia met in
    Sochi. Then Putin and Pashinyan met. At the end of September, Putin's
    visit to Azerbaijan is planned. Although the content of the
    negotiations behind closed doors is not known, it is clear that the
    Karabakh issue is mainly discussed. However, we do not know what
    exactly is being discussed. Maybe you will share your assumptions.
    What do these intensifying meetings and talks say? What can be the
    results of this?
    - The main interest of the Azerbaijani side in expanding relations
    with Russia is its assistance in the resolution of the Karabakh
    conflict. In no other issue Azerbaijan needs intervention and support
    from Russia. On the contrary, Moscow has the ability to create
    obstacles in all ambitious projects of Azerbaijan. Therefore, the
    country's leadership is doing everything possible to remove obstacles
    to the Russian Federation. I believe that at all meetings the
    Azerbaijani side raises the question of Russia's influence on Armenia
    in the resolution of the Karabakh conflict.
    Taking into account Russia"s ability to interfere in the internal
    affairs of the former Soviet republics, it has a lever of interference
    in the political processes of Azerbaijan. Moscow has always had the
    opportunity to threaten Baku with the deportation of Azerbaijanis.
    However, Azerbaijan managed to prevent this every time.
    - By the way, for a long time the issue of Azerbaijan's membership in
    the CSTO is being discussed. Is it possible to discuss this issue with
    the leadership of Azerbaijan and Armenia?
    - It became known from Pashinyan's statement made during the trip to
    Tavush region that he did not discuss this issue with Putin. At the
    same time, Ilham Aliyev's statement in Croatia on improving relations
    with NATO shows that talks about the possible membership of Azerbaijan
    in NATO do not correspond to reality. I have not heard serious
    comments from the Azerbaijani officials on this matter.
    - In general, what can you say about the processes taking place in the
    region? What is Russia going to do now?
    - The processes taking place in the region show that competition
    between Russia and Europe is continuing to increase its influence in
    the region. Russia has a powerful base of influence in the region.
    Europe is increasingly showing interest in maintaining control over
    political processes in the region. The example of Georgia shows that
    Europe strives to integrate this region according to its standards.
    Because Russia has no integration potential, the political potential
    and potential of civil society in Europe will grow in the region.
    Russia will always try to use methods of threats and pressure, which
    has no prospects. -0-