168: Police identify gunman as details emerge in home invasion case: Father and son subdue three armed attackers (photos)

Category
Society

Armenian police are probing the armed attack on a former chief judge’s home which took place August 28 shortly before midnight.

Police said that the 30 year old son of Arman Mkrtumyan, the former president of the Court of Cassation of Armenia, contacted police an hour after the incident and said that three masked gunmen have breached into his house in Dzoraghbyur, a village outside Yerevan.

The father and son tackled the assailants, and eventually one of the gunmen was subdued by the 30 year old after the latter used his gas pistol in self-defense. The two other gunmen fled the scene.

Police said that the assailant who was subdued is a local of Gyumri. He was identified as H. Rijenko. The identities of the two other attackers who are still at large are being clarified.

Police said the fugitives opened sporadic gunfire when the owner of the home and his father tried to resist.

More than a dozen of 7,62 caliber ammo cases, an AKM assault rifle, a bag containing duct tape and a metal instrument were discovered at the scene.

The apprehended assailant, H. Rijenko, has been placed under arrest.

Speaker Babloyan issues statement over domestic political situation (video)

President of the National Assembly of Armenia Ara Babloyan issued a statement over the domestic political situation, noting that he plans meetings with the President, Prime Minister, Ombudsman, Supreme Judicial Council of Armenia and representatives of international diplomatic missions to discuss the existing situation, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the parliament of Armenia.

The statement reads as follows,

“Dear compatriots,

I have attentively followed the activities of the Government during the 100 days and as the head of the parliament I expected to see a program aimed at the preservation of the country’s security, economic development, improvement of people’s welfare and of course further strengthening of democracy from my colleague, Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan. 100 days might be little time for hearing the complete vision of the PM over these issues and the constructive ways to solve them.

Definitely, I find that it’s necessary to fight against corruption. It’s definitely necessary to fight against monopolies.

I am convinced that people’s voice should always be heard. People should be maximally informed and involved in making the key decisions, since, as we know, the power in Armenia belongs to the people. But when doing all these we must be guided by only and only by the Constitution and laws, as well as by the full respect towards the international commitments assumed by the Republic of Armenia.

In this regard I record with regret that I am deeply concerned by the situation in the country.

The normal social-political life of the country, the legal-constitutional relations of state power bodies and public solidarity are under risk. I see dangers tendencies of dividing the public into supporters of revolution and counterrevolution and deepening of intolerance.

My concerns further rise especially after hearing this remark during PM Pashinyan’s speech. I quote ‘So I advise everyone to think before speaking. And you say that we limit your freedom of speech. You should first learn to think before speaking and then think about your freedom of speech.’

I have to admit that it was such remarks were unexpected for me to hear from PM Pashinyan for the simple reason that it’s just an encroachment against pluralism.

And frightening the judges and threatening the dissidents by the National Security Service parallel to this is not only a pressure against the judicial body, but also against anyone in the country who holds an opposite opinion.

There were also messages in PM Pashinyan’s speech very dangerous for the Constitutional order of the Republic of Armenia, and the fundaments of statehood, that are in direct contradiction with the international commitments assumed by Armenia for establishing a legal and democratic country.

Particularly, the way of addressing the judges by the Head of the Executive in a way like this “sober up,” is a merely threat for the independence of the judiciary and an interference to all the ongoing and future judicial examinations and decisions. Under the theory of “transitional justice” an anti-legal hint of giving retroactive effect to the laws was made.

At the same time, the implementation of possible constitutional changes at the National Assembly of Armenia, moreover, with the threat to ensure the desired outcome, is an overt pressure and compulsion against the legislative branch.

For me, this is further incomprehensible given the fact that the opportunities for such discussions and making decisions at the parliament were not exhausted.

Therefore, taking into account the aforementioned, I plan meetings with the President, Prime Minister, Ombudsman, Supreme Judicial Council of Armenia and representatives of international diplomatic missions to discuss the existing situation.

Remaining faithful to my constitutional mission, I assure you that the National Assembly will continue to exercise the powers vested in it by the law.”

Sharmazanov: I do not understand investigation officers’ haste to arrest Kocharyan

Arminfo, Armenia
Sharmazanov: I do not understand investigation officers’ haste to arrest Kocharyan

Yerevan July 27

Tatevik Shahunyan. “I consider it unreasonable and illogical the investigation’s proposal to choose arrest for RA former President Robert Kocharyan as a preventive measure.” Eventually, Kocharyan himself appeared for questioning, stated that he intended to remain until the end of the investigation and answer all questions. I do not understand haste of the investigation bodies in an attempt to apply arrest against second president of Armenia, the first president of Artsakh, a man who made a great contribution to the liberation struggle of the NKR and to the development of Armenia, Spokesperson of the Republican Party, Deputy Speaker of the parliament Eduard Sharmazanov said in a conversation with the correspondent of ArmInfo.

“Kocharyan was not afraid of enemy bullets at the time, and now he is unlikely to be afraid of the investigation, so the hasty intention to arrest him is not clear for me,” the Spokesman said, while agreeing to some extent with Kocharyan’s opinion that the recent processes around him may pursue the goal of preventing the possible participation of the second president in the forthcoming political processes, in particular, early parliamentary elections.

Sharmazanov did not exclude manifestations of personal and political motives in the case on the events of March 1, 2008. “However, if this is so, then such manifestations can have extremely negative consequences for the state,” he said. The Deputy Speaker also stressed that there are many questions in the legal process, which, at the very least, cause misunderstanding. “Thus, Article 140 of the Constitution of Armenia envisages that the head of state can not be prosecuted during his/her tenure and after that for actions arising from his office.” Now the question is whether the announcement of the state of emergency during the March 2008 events was within the limits of Kocharyan’s authority? In addition, he was charged with overthrowing the Constitutional order, which he himself was the guarantor of when he was president. How could a person who was a guarantor of the constitutional order, to overthrow it himself? There is another point that causes a legal casus – Kocharyan is charged under an article that was adopted a year after his resignation. I think that all these dubious points should be solved by the investigation, which hopefully will be fair and objective, “Sharmazanov summed up.

Touching upon the accusation against the CSTO Secretary General Yuri Khachaturov, who in 2008 occupied the post of the head of the Yerevan garrison, Sharmazanov noted that it could cast a shadow on Armenia’s image in the CSTO, and at other international platforms.

President Sarkissian, grandmaster Aronian and Armenian chess – Blogger Nas Daily releases another video on Armenia (video)

Category
Society

Famous blogger Nas Daily, who is in Armenia these days and is making videos, released another video on July 18 which is titled ‘How Armenia Teaches Kids!’.

“Places like Armenia give me hope for a world where everyone grows up to become grandmasters in whatever they like….all thanks to Education”, the blogger said on Facebook.

The video shows Armenian President Armen Sarkissian, chess grandmaster Levon Aronian all praising chess, as well as a number of kids playing chess. “Here in the country of Armenia I was amazed to see that in addition to math and science children also learn chess”, Nas Daily said in the video, adding that here every child is taught chess with dedicated schools and classrooms. “This teaches them how to focus, compete and develop their cognitive skills. Armenia is one of the best countries at chess in the world”, he added.

Before releasing the video, the blogger posted a photo on Instagram with Armenian President Armen Sarkissian with the following note: “Most politicians only talk about politics. But this President of Armenia is so cool he thought it was better to instead joke around over a glass of 20 year old Armenian Cognac. Incredible. Thank you for hosting us, Mr. President!”.

Nas Daily has over 7 million followers. He will spend 7-10 days in Armenia and will make videos.

On July 17 he released a video titled ‘This is The Land of Free Water!”

His visit to Armenia has been organized by the initiative of the Civil Aviation Committee and the State Tourism Committee.

Press Statement by Co-Chairs of OSCE Minsk Group following their meeting with Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan

The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group (Igor Popov of the Russian Federation, Stephane Visconti of France and Andrew Schofer of the United States of America) hosted an introductory meeting between Foreign Minister of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan and Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov on 11 July in Brussels. Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk also participated in the meeting. This was the first high-level meeting between the sides in this format since elections in Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The Ministers exchanged views regarding the situation on the ground and discussed next steps and parameters for re-engaging in substantive negotiations. The sides considered several issues for future meetings, including a range of possible confidence-building measures.

The Co-Chairs ‎stressed the importance of reducing tensions and avoiding inflammatory rhetoric. The Co-Chairs also reiterated their commitment to helping the sides find a peaceful solution to the conflict based on the core principles of the Helsinki Final Act, including the non-use or threat of force, territorial integrity, and the equal rights and self-determination of peoples.

The Ministers agreed to meet again in the near future under the auspices of the Co-Chairs.

My Karabakh – Part VI: Baku and Heydar Aliyev’s hands

JAM News

An Armenian journalist and writer recounts his experience surrounding the events of Nagorno-Karabakh, exclusively for JAMnews

This is the sixth installment in a series of essays written exclusively for JAMnews by Armenian journalist and writer Mark Grigoryan.

The first five installments are as follows:

My Karabakh – Part I: Hadrut, a donkey, water and a brawl

My Karabakh – Part II: 1988 – The Karabakh protests begin

My Karabakh – Part III: Summer of 1988 – Yerevan demands that Karabakh be returned

My Karabakh – Part IV: The Sumgait Chronicles

My Karabakh – Part V: War

“I can’t come in for the next procedure,” I told the dentist, “I’m leaving tomorrow.”

“Where to?” he asked.

“Baku,” I said smiling.

“How come?!” she asked with more than a hint of surprise on her face. “Isn’t it dangerous?”

We were assured our safety by the presidential administration. It was the end of June 1999, and this was the first post-war trip made by a group of Armenian journalists to Azerbaijan.

We flew to Baku on a small UN plane. Having left our stuff in the hotel, we set out for the presidential administration office where we were met by Vafa Guluzade, an advisor to then-president Heydar Aliyev. Rather agitated, Guluzade said that Armenia was nothing but a vassal of Russia, and that Russia does all it can to help Armenians.
And to support his assertion, he shook an edition of the Moscow Nezavisimaya Gazeta from the day before, on which a portrait of my friend Aleksandr Iskandaryan was clearly seen.

In the centre: Vafa Guluzade after meeting with Armenian and Azerbaijani journalists. In the background, TV journalist Artur Grigorian. On Guluzade’s left – Mark Grigorian, on the right – journalist Aleksey Manvelyan. Photo: Mark Grigorian.

Heydar Aliyev met us a day after in a brightly-lit hall. We sat at a long table, a pear-shaped glass of tea placed neatly in front of us all. Aliyev himself sat at the head of the table.

I was surprised at how thin he looked. It looked as if he had put on a suit that was tailored for a larger man – on him it looked as if it was hanging off a coat rack. Apparently he had lost a lot of weight after his heart operation which he had recently undergone in Cleveland.

His face, too, was surprising, immobile, with frozen muscles similar to that of a waxy mask. And the impression wasn’t different when he laughed either.

The conversation was, of course, about the conflict and Aliyev spent most of the time speaking about himself.

“There is no such thing as an eternal conflict, as there is no such thing as an eternal enemy,” he said, leaning back in his chair. “Sooner or later, the Karabakh conflict will be resolved.”

The TV cameras that were placed far away at the end of the hall studied him carefully. When Aliyev was brought a cup of tea, he leaned forward and glanced at his hands that he had folded on the table. I watched his gaze. The hands of the president were trembling.

Aliyev looked at his hands and I saw hatred in his gaze. It appeared as if he was trying through sheer will, through the energy of his gaze, to stop these tremors, but his hands did not obey him. There was something surreal about this: Heydar Aliyev was obeyed by all in Azerbaijan, except for his own hands, which continued to shake. His physiology and nature were above his own will. And that drove him crazy.

He looked at the cup of tea in front of him. One could see that Aliyev indeed wanted tea, but that he wouldn’t at any cost take the cup of tea in his hands and show any kind of weakness by spilling a drop or two or more.

He didn’t take a single sip.

Heydar Aliyev, June 1999. Photo: Mark Grigorian

The day before the meeting with Aliyev, I met with Eldar Zeynalov – a well known Azerbaijani human rights advocate. I asked him about Armenians that were still living in Baku, and he immediately reacted:  “One of them is in my office at the moment.”


And that’s how I met a young woman by the name of Angela. One could call her a modern Juliette who fell in love with an Azerbaijani Romeo. But their problem was that they couldn’t get married because of her full name: Angela Misakovna Ohanova. That was a distinctly Armenian name, which for many in post-war Baku sounded like the name of an enemy, the kind which workers at the marriage registration office would look at, throw her passport back in her face and say: “Go back to your Armenia and get married there. You’ve nothing to do here!”

I really wanted to help Angela and her beau – a quiet and pleasant guy. But how? I decided to speak to Heydar Aliyev. Understandably, this had to be done with as much tact as possible. And so, during the tea-drinking session, I asked: “How do Armenians get along in Azerbaijan?”

This was a move that allowed Aliyev to show himself in all his glory. He spoke at length about how Armenians, like other ethnic minorities, had the same rights as the majority population. And then I told him about Angela.

“Who is she?” he asked. “Why don’t I know about her?”

The thing was, as everybody said, Aliyev had a phenomenal memory. He could see and meet a person once and remember them 10 years later – their name and their profession and so on.

“Allow me,” Vafa Guluzade chimed in with zeal. “I’ll deal with it.”

Aliyev gave his permission. Two weeks later, I received an e-mail with some wedding photographs from the couple. And on that day, I called Guluzade from my office in Yerevan and thanked him.
When I was preparing this part of the article for publication, I was told that Angela had died. She had had a weak heart, and she had passed away several years ago.

From left to right: Angela Ohanova with her future husband. Mark Grigorian, Eldar Zeynalov. Photo: Mark Grigorian

In 2001, the French embassy in Azerbaijan invited me to a conference dedicated to the relations of the countries of the South Caucasus and Europe. I agreed. But when I arrived in Baku, something it seemed had gone wrong and I was left without a guard.

The thing was that after the war, when Armenians came to Azerbaijan or vice-versa, state security guards always accompanied them. They carefully watched and made sure that guests were not harmed. They also made sure that guests didn’t feel too free either – that is, so that they didn’t see anything that they shouldn’t.

And so I was deserted by the state security guards. Some administrative failure, and I ended up in Baku alone. Of course, I tried not to go outside on my own, but on the second day of the conference I decided to get some newspapers.

The kiosk was about 100 meters away. I got my newspapers, paid for them, and all of a sudden the vendor came out of the kiosk, closed the door behind him and asked: “Excuse me, when will this conflict finally end? We lived better with the Armenians than with Georgians.” I understood that he had seen a report about the conference on TV.

Avoiding to walk on the streets of Baku on my own, I nevertheless went out of the hotel with my friends and acquaintances.

Things weren’t entirely smooth. When we met with political analyst Arif Yunusov, we were walking around Armenikend – a formerly Armenian-populated part of the city – when someone approached us.

“This here,” Arif said, “is Mark Grigorian. An Armenian.”

The man put out his hand, shook mine, and then sharply pulled away.

“We’ll meet on the battlefield!” he cried.

It turned out that he was one of the deputy chairs of a very anti-Armenian political group headed by Arif Naqi. But, despite this little incident, I had a great time walking around the old city – I went up into Maidan Tower and had coffee on fountain square.

Journalist Shahin Rzayev took me to a souvenir shop. The vendor, a Russian woman about my age, asked me:

“Where are you from?”

“From Yerevan,” I answered.

She was a bit confused. She didn’t quite believe that it was possible to see an Armenian in downtown Baku.

“If you’ve come to us with good intentions, then welcome. But if you’ve come with other ideas… .”

She was still confused. She was even a bit afraid. I understood: after so many articles, TV reports and other stories about how Armenians – ALL Armenians – are terrorists and killers, it’s difficult to see such a terrorist at your front door. It’s impossible to know what to think.

But, as it turned out, I had not come with bad intentions. I bought some matroyshki – nested dolls – which instead of traditional female faces depicted owls.

Soon after this trip, Armenian journalists were prohibited from going to Azerbaijan. Now, only politicians and athletes could go.

The position Nikol Pashinyan completely coincides with the approaches of the authorities of Artsakh

Categories
Artsakh
Politics

Interview of Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh Masis Mayilian to News.am Agency

Question: Official Yerevan states the need to return Artsakh to the negotiation table. What is the possibility of it? Can you, please, present the position of Artsakh on this issue?

Answer: The position of Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on the need to return Artsakh to the negotiation process completely coincides with the approaches of the authorities of Artsakh. The need to restore the full-fledged trilateral negotiation format has repeatedly been mentioned by the President of Artsakh, Bako Sahakyan, and other officials both in public statements and at the negotiations with the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen for the past two decades. The former authorities of Armenia also raised this issue. The possibility of restoring the trilateral negotiation format was also admitted by the international mediators – the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen.

A few years ago, speaking as an independent expert, in an interview to the mass media I suggested that the authorities of Armenia and Artsakh clearly distribute the roles and powers of the two Armenian states in the process of peaceful settlement of the conflict with Azerbaijan. Ultimately, the Republic of Armenia could refuse to discuss with Azerbaijan and the mediators the key issues of the settlement, which, as agreed, would be attributed to the exclusive competence of the authorities of the Republic of Artsakh. Then the mediators and the third party would have no choice but invite the official delegation of Artsakh to the negotiation table.

The statement made by the new Prime Minister of Armenia in Stepanakert and Armenia’s National Assembly on his readiness to negotiate with the leadership of Azerbaijan exclusively on behalf of the Republic of Armenia actualizes the need to search for a mechanism for the restoration of the full-fledged trilateral negotiation format.

Question: Why does the Azerbaijani party oppose the restoration of the full-fledged negotiation format, and what will Artsakh’s participation in the negotiations bring?

Answer: The parliamentary delegation of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR) had participated in the negotiations under the auspices of the CSCE Minsk Conference chairmanship since the summer of 1992. In September 1993, the leadership of Nagorno Karabakh was recognized by the CSCE states as one of the main parties to the conflict. In the future, within the frameworks of the CSCE-OSCE, the UN and the CIS Inter-Parliamentary Assembly, various documents evidencing Nagorno Karabakh as a party to the conflict were adopted. In particular, in March 1995, the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office in his Prague Resume confirmed the “previous OSCE decisions on the status of the parties, i.e. the participation of the two State parties to the conflict and of the other conflicting party (Nagorno-Karabakh) in the whole negotiation process, including in the Minsk Conference “. It should be noted that until December 1994, along with the Minsk Process, trilateral negotiations were held with the mediation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Defense of Russia. Besides the trilateral negotiations, in 1993, series of bilateral negotiations between Artsakh and Azerbaijan took place, including the high –level meeting in Moscow in September 1993. Some of the negotiations resulted in signing documents between Stepanakert and Baku.

In addition to the final document of the OSCE Budapest Summit of 1994 and the trilateral and termless ceasefire agreement of May 12, 1994, there are many examples of recognizing the NKR as a conflicting party by official Baku and the international community. The status of Artsakh in the negotiation process on the settlement of the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict is legitimate and indisputable.

The trilateral negotiations, which were held until April 1997, proved to be the most optimal format for achieving concrete results in the negotiations. Each of the parties negotiated on the issues within its competence and assumed the responsibility for their implementation. It was in this format that the most tangible results of the negotiations were reached – the 1994 ceasefire agreement, as well as the arrangements on strengthening the ceasefire in 1995.

To overcome the current situation and to ensure progress in the negotiation process, we consider it necessary to return to the trilateral format of the settlement, which has already proved its effectiveness. This approach is also important in view of sharing the responsibility for the implementation of the peace agreement. The authorities of Artsakh are ready to assume de jure their share of responsibility for maintaining regional stability.

Azerbaijan’s actual refusal to hold full-format negotiations with the participation of official representatives of Artsakh means the Azerbaijani authorities’ lack of will to resolve the conflict through peaceful negotiations and that this country is satisfied with the existing status quo, which allows it to gain time to prepare for new armed aggression against sovereign Artsakh. This is attested also by the Azerbaijani authorities’ unwillingness to take practical steps to implement the agreements reached in Vienna (May 16, 2016), St. Petersburg (June 20, 2016), Geneva (October 16, 2017), and Krakow (January 18, 2018) regarding the expansion of the Office of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and the establishment of mechanisms for investigating the violations of the cease-fire regime to create a constructive atmosphere in the settlement process. Such behavior of the Azerbaijani authorities raises a natural question about official Baku’s ability to respect reached agreements.

During the April war of 2016 initiated by Azerbaijan, the world power centers, leaders of authoritative international structures and separate states called upon the parties for restraint and for taking the path of exclusively peaceful settlement of the conflict. It is obvious that these calls were insufficient and were openly ignored by the authorities in Baku. New international political and diplomatic measures are needed to deter Azerbaijan, including steps to recognize the independence of Artsakh, which will ensure the irreversibility of the peace process and regional security.

Novice pilots from Russia’s airbase in Armenia to master MiG-29 fighters

Russia's Defense Technologies Newswire
June 7, 2018 Thursday 11:23 AM GMT
Novice pilots from Russia's airbase in Armenia to master MiG-29 fighters
MOSCOW June 7
HIGHLIGHT: Novice pilots from Russia's Erebuni airbase in Armenia will
arrive in the flight personnel training and conversion center in
Lipetsk in central Russia to master the Mikoyan MiG-29 (NATO reporting
name: Fulcrum) fighter jet, the Southern Military District's press
office said.
MOSCOW, June 7. /TASS-DEFENSE/. Novice pilots from Russia's Erebuni
airbase in Armenia will arrive in the flight personnel training and
conversion center in Lipetsk in central Russia to master the Mikoyan
MiG-29 (NATO reporting name: Fulcrum) fighter jet, the Southern
Military District's press office said.
"Skilled instructors will give a flight training course, considering
the experience of using aircraft in various local conflicts, including
during the counterterrorism operation in Syria," the press office
said.
The novice pilots who have graduated this year will study the combat
capabilities of MiG-29 fighters during high-precision bombing with the
use of a satellite navigation system.
The pilots will undergo a 30-hour training course on special training
simulators. Then, they will practice elementary and advanced flying,
as well as aerobatics at high and low altitudes under the supervision
of their instructors.
At the end of the training course, the pilots will be permitted to
perform solo flights and then they will sharpen their flying skills in
mountainous terrain in Transcaucasia.

168: Cabinet approves government’s program, submits to Parliament

Categories
BUSINESS & ECONOMY
Politics

During today’s session the Cabinet approved the government’s program.

The key goal of the government’s activity is to enshrine the values of the peaceful, velvet, democratic revolution that took place in Armenia in April-May 2018 as a base for public and national relations and to implement the ideas of the revolution as a constant political reality.

The basic directions of the government’s activity are the followings: the formation of power solely through the people’s free _expression_ of will, the national unity and civil solidarity based on everyone’s being equal before the rule of law and law, ensuring Armenia’s domestic and external security, constant increase of the security level of Armenia and Artsakh, public rejection of corruption and corruption-free society, the practical division of politics and business and etc.

The government’s program also touches upon the preparations for the snap parliamentary elections. According to that, the 6th convocation Parliament doesn’t reflect the real political moods, preferences of the people and the ratio of real powers. This reality creates a strict necessity to hold snap parliamentary elections in Armenia. The government attaches importance to holding such snap parliamentary elections which will be really free, fair, transparent and democratic. In order to hold such elections and record indisputable results by the public it is necessary to make significant changes in the Electoral Code and the electoral system. According to the government’s program, it is necessary to refuse from the ranked voting system and transition completely to the proportional system, form election lists that will reflect the new real picture. The snap parliamentary elections are needed to be held within a maximum of one year.

The government proposes the Speaker of the Parliament to hold an extraordinary session on June 7, at 11:00. During today’s Cabinet meeting, Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinyan said the issue on approving the government’s program will be in the session agenda.