Germany Offers Aid to Armenia in Bid to Curtail Russian Influence: Report

Jan 10 2024

By: Momen Zellmi

Reports from Russia cite informed sources that Germany is offering financial aid to Armenia, with strings attached that ostensibly aim to weaken Russian influence in the region. The terms of this reported aid package include the removal of Russian border guards from Armenian territory and the displacement of pro-Russian individuals from key positions within Armenia’s military, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement.

The financial aid, which is said to be tied to supporting the government of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, reportedly includes measures to prevent the mass migration of Karabakh Armenians to European Union countries. This is viewed as part of Germany’s broader geopolitical strategy to create a divide between Armenia and Moscow, and integrate Armenia into the anti-Russian policy of the West. The Russian media report suggests that Berlin is offering to provide Yerevan with financial and technical assistance, in addition to political support.

This move by Germany, if substantiated, could be seen as part of a larger effort to reduce Russian influence in Armenia and the surrounding region. Amid escalating tensions between Russia and the West, the financial aid package reportedly offered by Germany could represent a strategic pivot for Armenia, a country traditionally allied with Russia but now potentially drawn into the broader geopolitical chessboard.

While this report is yet to be officially confirmed, the alleged offer from Germany could have significant implications for the dynamics of power in the Caucasus region. A shift in Armenia’s allegiances could strain relations with Russia and provoke a response from Moscow. Moreover, the displacement of pro-Russian individuals from key positions could cause internal friction within Armenia and potentially destabilize the region. As the world watches, the move could set a precedent for how Western nations engage with countries within Russia’s sphere of influence.

AW: AYF Camp Haiastan 2024: Exciting Opportunities Await You!

FRANKLIN, Mass.—As the winter frost blankets the landscape, the anticipation for another enriching and unforgettable summer at AYF Camp Haiastan is already building. We are thrilled to announce the openings for staff positions for the upcoming 2024 camping season! Join us in making a difference in the lives of our campers and fostering a vibrant community.

Director Positions – Deadline: February 5

  • Food Service Director: Oversee the culinary experience at AYF Camp Haiastan, ensuring delicious and nutritious meals for our campers and staff. 
  • Health Center Director: Be the guardian of our campers’ well-being, overseeing the Health Center and ensuring the safety of all.
  • MESH Specialist: Bring your expertise in the fields of Music, Education, Sports and Handiwork to create an immersive and engaging experience for our campers.
  • Summer Director: Lead the charge in organizing and orchestrating a summer full of fun, growth and lasting memories.

Specialty Positions – Deadline: February 20

  • Armenian School Teacher: Inspire campers with the rich history and culture of Armenia through educational and interactive lessons.
  • Arts & Crafts Coordinator: Along with your cabin counselor responsibilities, you will be responsible for creating, executing and overseeing the arts & crafts program. 
  • Head Counselor: Guide and mentor fellow counselors, fostering a positive and supportive environment for campers.
  • Healthcare Provider: Provide essential medical care and support, ensuring the well-being of all campers and staff.
  • Health Center Assistant: Along with your cabin counselor responsibilities, you will assist the medical professionals on staff with daily administrative and healthcare related tasks. 
  • Lifeguard: Safeguard our campers as they enjoy water activities, creating a safe and enjoyable aquatic environment.
  • Prep Cook: Contribute to the culinary magic by assisting in food preparation, ensuring our campers and staff are well fed.
  • Summer Office Admin: Keep things running smoothly behind the scenes, managing administrative tasks to ensure a seamless camp experience.

Summer 2023 Cabin Counselors Ungerouhi Alina and Unger Sam

Summer Support Staff – Deadline: March 3

  • Cabin Counselor: Be a role model and guide for campers, creating a positive and inclusive living environment.
  • Campgrounds Care SIT: Learn the ropes of maintaining our beautiful campgrounds, ensuring a clean and safe space for all.
  • Counselor-In-Training (CIT): Gain valuable leadership experience and mentorship as you prepare to become a future AYF Camp Haiastan counselor.
  • Day Camp Counselor: Bring the camp spirit to day campers, creating a memorable and engaging experience.
  • Kitchen Operations SIT: Learn the ins and outs of the kitchen, supporting the culinary team in providing delicious meals.
  • Teen Session Cabin Counselor: Be a role model and guide for our teen-session campers and new cabin counselors, creating a positive and magical camping experience for all. 

Apply now and choose to serve our youth this summer. More information can be found on our website

AYF Camp Haiastan is not just a camp; it’s a community where lifelong friendships are forged and memories are made. Join us in creating another incredible summer for our campers!

Located in Franklin, Massachusetts, AYF Camp Haiastan, was founded in 1951 and is the oldest Armenian camp in the United States. The Camp prides itself on providing a healthy and safe experience to Armenian-American youth to help them foster their Armenian identity and establish lifelong friendships.


Armenia Considers Departure from Russia-Led Military Bloc

Dec 22 2023

  • Armenia's dissatisfaction with the CSTO stems from the organization's inaction during Azerbaijani incursions and increased cooperation with the EU.
  • The Armenian government explores various options, including Euro-integration and adopting a non-bloc status, amidst debates about expelling Russian military bases.
  • Analysts suggest that Armenia's departure from the CSTO could be a logical outcome, potentially opening avenues for diverse defense and military-industrial collaborations with other countries.

Armenia's possible exit from the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) is being discussed more and more actively as differences grow between Yerevan and Moscow.

Many in Armenia are wondering what the point is of remaining in a military alliance that has demonstrated its unwillingness to protect the country. 

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has repeatedly denied claims, including by Russian officials, of an imminent change in Armenia's foreign policy vector, but that has not stopped speculation as to how the country might leave the CSTO and what would come next. Representatives of the authorities are themselves musing about this prospect. 

 "There is of course the idea of Euro-integration in Armenia, but there is also the idea of becoming a country with non-bloc status, so there's a wide range of options. We are listening to civil society and trying to figure out what the best tools are for ensuring Armenia's security and development," Security Council Secretary Armen Grigoryan said at a forum in Brussels on November 10 titled, The Strategic Future of Armenia: Armenia-Europe.

Fifteen Armenian public organizations recently released a statement criticizing Russia for, as they put it, interfering in Armenia's internal affairs. The statement demands that the Armenian government expel Russia's 102nd military base, ban Russian broadcast media, and begin the process of ending the country's membership in the CSTO. 

Growing dissatisfaction with Russia

The CSTO, which also includes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Belarus, is one of the main causes of the growing Armenian resentment toward Russia. 

The bloc, which is, theoretically, bound to come to the aid of a member state when it is attacked, took practically no action in September last year when Azerbaijani troops invaded border areas and took up positions on strategic heights inside Armenia.   

Since then, Armenia's approach to the CSTO, and to Russia, has been increasingly confrontational. Yerevan has reduced its participation in the bloc to an absolute minimum. Over the past year, it has snubbed CSTO meetings at practically every level and has reassigned its representative in the organization to other work and left his post vacant.

At the same time, Armenia has welcomed more intensive cooperation with the EU, which at the start of this year deployed a civilian monitoring mission to the Azerbaijani border with the aim of supporting stability there. 

This step elicited a sharply negative reaction from the Russian authorities, who claimed the mission's purpose was to "confront Russia geopolitically" in the South Caucasus region.

Such rhetoric from Moscow has done nothing to stop the growing cooperation between Yerevan and Brussels, including in the military sphere. 

At the summit of EU foreign ministers on December 11, it was announced that the EU would review the possibility of rendering military aid to Armenia through the European Peace Fund.

It was also announced that the EU mission in Armenia would increase the number of its monitors from 138 to 209. 

Another sore spot for Armenia is Russia's alleged failure to deliver weapons that Yerevan says it paid millions of dollars for.  

The Armenian authorities have no plans to sue Russia and instead seek to solve the matter in an "atmosphere of partnership," Deputy Defence Minister Hrachya Sargsyan told a briefing on December 4. 

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan recently proposed resolving the dispute through Russia canceling part of Yerevan's overall debt to Moscow. That total debt amounts to about $280 million, according to the Armenian Finance Ministry's latest calculations. (Armenia has not released precise figures on how much money Russia owes it for undelivered weapons.) 

Scenarios for leaving the CSTO

Most of the analysts Eurasianet spoke to see Armenia exiting the CSTO as a logical possible outcome of the current strained relations between Armenia and Russia. 

The head of the Research Center on Security Policy in Yerevan, Areg Kochinyan, says that Armenia could withdraw from the CSTO after approving a national security strategy that stipulates "non-bloc status" for the country. A new national security strategy is currently being drafted, and it's unknown now whether it will contain such a provision. 

If the national security strategy were amended so, "It would mean that Armenia has decided not to participate in any military bloc or alliance and therefore it would have to leave the CSTO. But at the same time it would mean that the country would not seek to become part of any other collective defense bloc," Kochinyan told Eurasianet. "I think this position would be more acceptable for Russia and the other regional powers, Iran and Turkey."

Yerevan-based political analyst David Arutyunov doesn't find it difficult to imagine Armenia leaving the CSTO.  

"In the context of the whole scope of Armenia's close relations with Russia, including in the economic sphere and the presence of the Russian military base here, leaving the CSTO is a relatively easy matter," Arutyunov told Eurasianet, adding that another crisis could provide the final impetus for quitting the bloc. 

He said the Armenian authorities have deftly managed to achieve domestic political aims by directing public discontent over the country's security problems towards Russia and the CSTO. 

"If something like the crisis of September 2022 happens again and causes internal political ructions in Armenia, it's possible that the Armenian government will resort to leaving the CSTO" in a bid to deflect criticism. 

What might Armenia's "non-bloc status" mean?  

Areg Kochinyan, of the Research Center on Security Policy, believes that a "non-bloc status" could open up opportunities for expanding Armenia's defense and military-industrial cooperation with various countries.

"We're talking not just about the West, but also other countries like India, that produce weapons. Armenia can enhance its relations with them even to the level of strategic partnership," he said. 

David Arutyunov believes that it's too early to speak about any real prospect of Armenia being outside of any military-political alliances.

"For now all this talk is theoretical. There are no real discussions on realizing this in practice. And even so, the talk pertains to the CSTO specifically, while bilateral relations with Russia will remain in any case – alongside contacts with the West," Arutyunov said.

The head of the Armenian Institute for Resilience and Statecraft, Gevorg Melikyan, is doubtful that the Armenian authorities really intend to leave the CSTO and declare non-bloc status.

"I don't see any such clear policy or strategy. For now, it's a matter of the Armenian government's desire to make an impression on Western partners to extract some kind of security guarantees. Since there are none [such guarantees], the Armenian government will try to convince Western partners to treat Armenia like they would treat any other anti-Russian country and not accuse it of maintaining contacts with Russia in the security sphere because it remains in the CSTO," Melikyan told Eurasianet. 

Arshaluis Mgdesyan via Eurasianet.org

https://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/International/Armenia-Considers-Departure-from-Russia-Led-Military-Bloc.html

Prime Minister Pashinyan meets UN Under-Secretary-General Rabab Fatima

 19:28,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 14, ARMENPRESS.  Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan received Rabab Fatima, UN Under-Secretary-General and High Representative for LDCs.

The Prime Minister emphasized the holding of the Ministerial Meeting of Landlocked Developing Countries in Yerevan and expressed confidence that the discussions would be productive, the Prime Minister's Office said in a readout.

The Prime Minister emphasized the importance of implementing programs aimed at the development and cooperation of landlocked countries. In this context, the Prime Minister touched upon the possibilities of opening communication channels in the region and the steps of the Armenian government in that direction.

Rabab Fatima noted that the meeting held in Yerevan on the theme “promoting equitable, affordable and inclusive transport connectivity for sustainable and resilient economies ” is an official thematic meeting ahead of the Third Landlocked Developing Countries Conference (LLDC), which will be held in Kigali in June 2024.

The UN Deputy Secretary-General, on behalf of the UN Secretary-General, invited Prime Minister Pashinyan to participate in the event in Kigali.
UN Under-Secretary-General on behalf of the UN Secretary General invited Prime Minister Pashinyan to take part in the event in Kigali.



Armenia, Czech Republic Foreign Ministries hold bilateral talks

 21:30,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 14, ARMENPRESS.  Political consultations between the Ministries of Foreign Affairs of Armenia and the Czech Republic were held in Yerevan on Thursday.

The Armenian delegation was represented by Deputy Foreign Minister Paruyr Hovhannisyan, and the Czech delegation was led by Deputy Foreign Minister Jan Marian.

The parties lauded the high level of political dialogue between Armenia and the Czech Republic, the need to maintain it and discussed a wide range of issues related to the Armenian-Czech bilateral agenda. Referring to the prospects of economic cooperation between the two countries, the parties emphasized the session of the Armenian-Czech intergovernmental commission to be held in May and expressed readiness to take steps in the direction of expanding economic ties. During the meeting, the sides discussed cooperation in cultural, educational and scientific spheres, the foreign ministry said.

"Reference was made to the issues related to the Armenia-EU comprehensive partnership agenda, the possibilities of mutual support within the framework of international organizations. Amidst the discussion, the importance of regular political contacts was also emphasized. Views were exchanged on a number of issues of the regional and international agenda," the statement reads.

According to the source, Deputy Foreign Minister Hovhannisyan presented to his counterpart the "Crossroads of Peace" program developed by the Armenian government and the latest developments in the process of normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Reference was made to the December 7 joint statement of the staffs of the Prime Minister of Armenia and the President of Azerbaijan and the importance of further active steps in that direction.

Referring to the large-scale military attack carried out by Azerbaijan against the people of Nagorno-Karabakh in September and the resulting ethnic cleansing, the deputy minister presented the steps being taken to meet the needs of forcibly displaced people of Nagorno-Katrabakh and to protect their fundamental rights.

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 12/11/2023

                                        Monday, 


Karabakh Leaders Vow Continued Fight For ‘Rights’

        • Shoghik Galstian

Nagorno-Karabakh - People gather outside the parliament building in Stepanakert 
during the election of a new Karabakh president, September 9, 2023.


Nagorno-Karabakh’s exiled political leadership has balked at attempts to 
“finally close the Artsakh issue” while signaling its desire to discuss them 
with the Armenian government.

The Karabakh parliament made the offer in a weekend statement issued on the 22nd 
anniversary of a referendum on the region’s secession from Azerbaijan which it 
said reaffirmed the Karabakh Armenians’ “will to have an independent state.”

“Taking into account the intensity of the steps taken by the parties interested 
in the final closure of the Artsakh issue and the aggressive behavior of the 
parties interested in it, the National Assembly reaffirms its commitment to 
stand up for the rights of the people of Artsakh and expresses its readiness to 
discuss all contentious issues with the interested parties,” it said.

Although the statement did not name those parties, it seemed primarily addressed 
to the Armenian government.

“All those individuals who do not want Artsakh’s state institutions to operate 
stand for the destruction of the Artsakh statehood,” said Davit Galstian, the 
leader of the Artarutyun (Justice) bloc represented in the Karabakh legislature. 
But he too did not name names.

Political allies of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian have said in recent weeks 
that Karabakh government bodies should be dissolved following the recent 
restoration of Azerbaijani control over the territory and the resulting exodus 
of its ethnic Armenian population.

Armenian parliament speaker Alen Simonian declared on November 16 that their 
continued activities would pose a “direct threat to Armenia’s security.” Gevorg 
Papoyan, a deputy chairman of Pashinian’s Civil Contract party, on Monday echoed 
that warning condemned by the Armenian opposition.

“This is would be a bomb planted under the Republic of Armenia,” Papoyan told 
journalists. He also pointed to Karabakh President Samvel Shahramanian’s 
September 28 decree which said that the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh 
Republic, set up in September 1991, will cease to exist on January 1.

Shahramanian implied in October that the decree is null and void. He said he was 
forced to sign it in order to stop the hostilities and enable the Karabakh 
Armenians to safely flee their homeland.

The Karabakh parliament’s statement likewise said that Shahramanian’s decision 
forced by Baku helped to prevent a “genocide.”

Pashinian’s government stopped championing the Karabakh Armenians’ right to 
self-determination in April 2022. A year later, Pashinian declared that it 
recognizes Karabakh as a part of Azerbaijan. Armenian opposition leaders say 
that this policy change paved the way for Azerbaijan’s September 19-20 military 
offensive in Karabakh.

Simonian said later in November that a peace treaty currently discussed by Baku 
and Yerevan should not contain any special provisions on Karabakh and the return 
of its ethnic Armenian residents.




Ruling Party Vague On Next Steps In Gyumri

        • Satenik Kaghzvantsian

Armenia - Civil Contract leaders in Gyumri hold a news conference, December 11, 
2023.


Armenia’s ruling Civil Contract party gave no indications on Monday that it will 
try to oust the mayor of Gyumri through a no-confidnce vote after pulling out of 
a power-sharing agreement with his political force.

The agreement was reached two years ago following a municipal election in which 
a bloc linked to the city’s longtime former mayor, Samvel Balasanian, garnered 
most votes but fell short of a majority in the local council. The Balasanian 
Bloc teamed up with Civil Contract, which finished second.

In line with that deal, the new Gyumri council appointed the Balasanian Bloc’s 
Vardges Samsonian as mayor and two Civil Contract members as deputy mayors. 
Seveal other members of the party led by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian were 
also given posts in the municipal administration.

All those officials stepped down after Civil Contract unexpectedly announced 
last week the end of the power-sharing arrangement. It said vaguely that it does 
not want to be part of what it called “shady governance.”

Local Civil Contract leaders shed little light on their discord with the 
Balasanian Bloc when they met the press to explain the decision. They accused 
the bloc and the incumbent mayor of a lack of transparency but did not elaborate.

Knarik Harutiunian, who leads the Civil Contract group in the city council, 
complained about “outside forces meddling in municipal governance.” It was not 
clear whether she referred to ex-Mayor Balasanian.

“I will now refrain from giving any names,” said Harutiunian.

Pashinian’s party scrapped the coalition deal in Gyumri one day after 
controversially ousting the head of a major community in neighboring Lori 
province comprising the town of Alaverdi and two dozen other towns and villages.

The mayor, Arkadi Tamazian, lost his narrow majority in the Alaverdi council 
after one of its members representing his opposition Aprelu Yerkir party 
defected to Civil Contract in July. Civil Contract capitalized on the defection 
to replace Tamazian by its local leader amid serious procedural violations 
alleged by the Armenian opposition and some civil society members.

Commenators have suggested that Pashinian’s political team may attempt a similar 
power grab in Armenia’s second largest city. Harutiunian said, however, that 
such a scenario is “not realistic” because Civil Contract controls only 11 of 
the 33 seats in the Gyumri council. She insisted that her party has not urged 
any council members to defect to it or reeived such offers from any of them.

Meanwhile, the Balasanian Bloc and the Gyumri mayor remained reluctant to 
comment on Civil Contract’s accusations and reveal their next steps. The 
collapse of their alliance with Pashinian came as a surprise also because 
Balasanian’s son Misak was appointed as Armenia’s ambassador to Iraq just two 
months ago.




Argentina’s New President Vows Closer Ties With Armenia


Argentina - Argentina's President-elect Javier Milei meets Armenian President 
Vahagn Khachaturian, Buenos Aires, December 9, 2023.


Argentina’s new President Javier Milei met with his Armenian counterpart Vahagn 
Khachaturian and called for closer ties between their countries ahead of his 
inauguration ceremony held on Sunday.

Khachaturian was among a handful of foreign leaders, including Ukrainian 
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who attended the ceremony held in Buenos Aires. 
According to the Armenian presidential press office, he was the first of those 
dignitaries to be received by Milei in his new capacity.

“I have been to Armenia and am familiar with Armenia,” the office quoted Milei 
as saying. “I am confident that we will further deepen our relations.”

The Armenian president, who has largely ceremonial powers, likewise expressed 
confidence that the two governments “will do everything to raise the 
Armenian-Argentinian relationship to a higher level.” He thanked Argentina for 
its “support that has been shown to Armenia in recent years.”

Khachaturian held a separate meeting with the South American country’s outgoing 
President Alberto Fernandez and gave him an Armenian state medal, the Order of 
Honor. Fernandez has repeatedly denounced Azerbaijan’s blockade of the Lachin 
corridor that preceded its September military offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Armenia has long maintained warm relations with Argentina as well as neighboring 
Brazil and Uruguay cemented by the existence of influential Armenian communities 
in the three nations. There are an estimated 120,000 ethnic Armenians living in 
Argentina. Most of them are descendants of survivors of the 1915 Armenian 
genocide in Ottoman Turkey.

Armenia - Argentine-Armenian businessman Eduardo Eurnekian speaks to reporters 
in Echmiadzin, 14Sep2017.

The most prominent Argentinian of Armenian descent is Eduardo Eurnekian, 
Argentina’s fourth-richest person whose Corporacion America group runs 53 
airports in and outside the country and also has a wide range of other business 
assets.

Milei, who is known for his libertarian and far-right views, worked for the 
conglomerate from 2008-2021, eventually becoming its chief economist. Eurnekian 
reportedly backed his former employee’s presidential bid. An Argentinian 
lawmaker quoted by the Financial Times in September described the 90-year-old 
billionaire as Milei’s “intellectual father.”

“I think Milei would be a very good president,” Eurnekian told the London-based 
paper at the time.

Corporacion America’s holdings also include Yerevan’s Zvartnots international 
airport. Eurnekian also invested in other sectors of the Armenian economy in the 
early 2000s. In particular, he purchased an Armenian commercial bank and set up 
what is now one of the South Caucasus country’s largest wine companies.

In 2017, then Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian bestowed the highest state 
award, the title of National Hero, on Eurnekian.




Armenian Official Looks Forward To Peace Deal With Azerbaijan

        • Karlen Aslanian
        • Robert Zargarian

Armenia - Armen Grigorian, the secretary of Armenia’s Security Council, March 
10, 2023.


Armenia and Azerbaijan moved closer to signing a bilateral peace treaty by 
agreeing to exchange prisoners and take other confidence-building measures, a 
senior Armenian official said over the weekend.

“We believe that this is a very positive, important step towards signing the 
peace treaty,” Armen Grigorian, the secretary of Armenia’s Security Council, 
told Armenian Public Television.

“To a certain extent, this is the kind of step which shows that there is a 
desire to follow the logic of solving problems, and the peace treaty is the 
biggest opportunity to solve problems,” he said.

The Armenian government is ready to sign the treaty before the end of this month 
even if that time frame “seems a bit difficult” now, added Grigorian.

The agreement on the prisoner swap announced last Thursday is the result of 
direct Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations. Azerbaijan is to free 32 Armenian 
captives in exchange for Armenia’s release of two Azerbaijani soldiers and 
support for Baku’s bid to host the COP29 climate summit next year.

A senior Armenian pro-government lawmaker, Sargis Khandanian, cautioned on 
Friday that implications of the prisoner swap should not be overestimated. The 
two sides have only solved a “humanitarian issue” and it remains be seen whether 
they can make similar progress on other fronts, he said.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev twice cancelled talks with Armenian Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian which the European Union planned to host in October. 
The peace accord was due to be their main focus.

Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov similarly withdrew from a November 
20 meeting with his Armenian counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan that was due to take 
place in Washington. Baku accused the Western powers of pro-Armenian bias and 
proposed direct negotiations with Yerevan.

Mirzoyan deplored later in November Baku’s “refusal to come to meetings 
organized by various international actors, including the U.S. and the EU.” 
Bayramov claimed that Yerevan itself is dragging its feet on the peace treaty.

Aliyev likewise accused the Armenian side of “artificially dragging out the 
process” in an interview with the Euronews TV channel recorded on November 23 
but aired on December 9. He said at the same that Azerbaijan’s recent recapture 
of Nagorno-Karabakh, which led to the mass exodus of the region’s ethnic 
Armenian population, removed the main obstacle to the Armenian-Azerbaijani 
treaty.


Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Presidents of Egypt, Russia agree on continued efforts to reach ceasefire in Gaza

 15:58, 9 December 2023

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 9, ARMENPRESS. The Egyptian and Russian presidents, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Vladimir Putin, have discussed the situation in the Gaza Strip and the issues of delivery of humanitarian assistance to the enclave in a telephone conversation and agreed on continued efforts to reach a ceasefire in the Palestinian sector, the Egyptian presidential spokesman Ahmed Fahmy said, Tass reports.

The sides also discussed "Egypt’s efforts on delivery of most humanitarian assistance required for providing support to Gaza residents to the sector," the spokesman added.

''Al-Sisi and Putin agreed on "continuation of seriously reaching a ceasefire in the sector, as well as making sure that the international community assumes responsibility for reaching this target," he noted.

Jerusalem: Armenian Christians battle developer to keep control of their corner the city

SIGHT Magazine
Dec 6 2023

RNS

Amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, another battle is playing out in Jerusalem among its small but storied Armenian Christian community, their own patriarch and an Australian-Israeli businessman who is said to be set on taking over the Armenian Quarter of the Old City. 

Last month, things escalated as Jewish settlers aided by dogs and bulldozers disrupted a long-running sit-in in a site known as the Cow’s Garden, currently a parking lot, where businessman Danny Rothman plans to build his latest hotel.

Rothman’s company, Xana Capital Group, made a secret deal in 2021 with the Armenian Christian patriarchate to lease a swath of the Armenian Quarter, including part of the Armenian Theological Seminary and several family homes. When the deal became public, the local community rebelled, a priest who oversees the church’s real estate was defrocked and Patriarch Nourhan Manougian’s leadership came under question.

“This is land that belongs to the Armenian community for centuries,” Levon Kalaydjian, a Jerusalem-born Armenian, told Religion News Service. “This does not belong to the patriarchate, nor is it for him, the Patriarch, to do whatever he wants to do with it.”

Armenians have had a presence in Jerusalem since the fourth century, when Armenia became the first sovereign state to convert to Christianity. Some of Jerusalem’s Armenians trace their heritage to pilgrims who came to the holy city nearly that long ago, while others arrived from the former Ottoman Empire, fleeing the Armenian genocide in 1915 and 1916.

Today the smallest of the four divisions of Jerusalem’s Old City, the Armenian Quarter is considered separate from the larger Christian Quarter, where Palestinian Christians speak Arabic and worship in Greek Orthodox or Catholic churches.

The 2,000 or so Armenians, who speak a unique Jerusalem dialect of Armenian and belong to the Armenian Apostolic Church, are represented by the Armenian Patriarchate and the monastic order of the Brotherhood of St James, which acts as a mini-welfare state: Most Armenians live in church-owned property and work in a church or monastery. 

In Jerusalem’s tense cultural politics, the Armenians are widely considered the most peaceful demographic in the Old City, maintaining good relations with both Jewish Israelis and Arab Palestinians. That unique status has been complicated by the fact that they are sitting on one of the Holy Land’s most valuable pieces of real estate. 

“The piece of land we’re talking about is one of the most important in the city, if not in the country and the world,” said Setrag Balian, one of the founders of the current protest movement. “Striking as it might sound, it is a fact.”

The Armenian Quarter occupies the highest point in the Old City and lies along the main path from the Jaffa Gate to the Western Wall and Jewish Quarter. It is also situated on one of the few vehicle-accessible roads in the Old City. The Cow’s Garden is one of the few undeveloped spaces inside the walls.

“The Armenian community used to feed off of that land, and Armenian pilgrims used to come camp there and put up their tents and caravans,” Balian said. “Other than the cultural and historic fact that this is the Armenian Quarter, it had economic importance; our life depended on that land.

“And today, even as parking, it depends on it. In modern times, in municipalities all over the world, one of the biggest problems is the matter of parking, so this should also not be underestimated,” he added. 

It’s not the first time someone has tried to wrest control of land from the Armenian community. Enver Pasha, the Ottoman minister of war who was an architect of the Armenian Genocide, once eyed the Cow’s Garden for a summer home, while Jerusalem’s five-time mayor, Teddy Kollek, also pressed for previous patriarchs to allow construction on the land, along with numerous other potential investors. 

None was successful until the deal with Xana, signed in 2021.

The 49-year lease deal will allow Xana to build a luxury hotel complex over not only the Cow’s Garden but the Patriarch’s private garden and the seminary’s main hall, where nearly all of the community’s celebrations are held, some 1.6 hectares in all. The deal also gives Xana the unilateral power to renew the lease for another half century after the initial term is up, for a total of 98 years.

The return for the patriarchate is a lump-sum payment of $US2 million and a yearly rent of just $US300,000 – less than previous offers and a paltry sum for one of the world’s most valuable properties, leading to accusations of bribery and corruption in the agreement. 

Exacerbating the community’s concerns is the developer’s profile. Though Rothman, who also goes by Rubinstein, has been involved in tourism in Israel for decades, little is known about his company, which is based in Dubai, making inquiries about its history and holdings difficult. 

The deal also came at a time when both Christians and Muslims in the Old City and east Jerusalem are under pressure by Jewish settler groups, attempting to take control of properties for the explicit aim of ‘Judaising’ the city.

Patriarch Manougian has claimed that the patriarchate’s real-estate manager, Baret Yeretsian, misinformed him about the deal, and he has defrocked and exiled him. Yeretsian had to be removed from the Old City under police protection in May, due to the community protests outside of the patriarchate.

In October, the Patriarch cancelled the deal, saying it was illegal because it had not been approved by the Synod of the Brotherhood of St James, but only after more than two years of internal pressure from the Armenian community.

Since the cancellation, the patriarchate has put out a statement stressing the danger to the Armenian character of the quarter, and the Patriarch has at times joined the protesters in the Cow’s Garden. 

“Better late than never,” Kalaydjian said.

The controversy has been compared to a 2005 scandal in the Old City, when the Greek Patriarch of Jerusalem was dismissed after signing a deal to give over Christian properties in the city to the far-right Jewish settler group, Ateret Cohanim, which some saw as a concession to Israeli designs on non-Jewish sectors of Jerusalem. Yeretsian pointed out that Rothman is a secular Jew, whose investment partner is a Palestinian Greek Orthodox Christian.

But on 5th November armed settler activists appeared with dogs and bulldozers demanding that construction begin on Rothman’s hotel. Balian accused Rothman and his partner of  “cheap intimidation tactics” using “settler groups that don’t even come from Jerusalem, or the Old City.”

The strategy didn’t work.

“We’re a 1,700-year-old presence at least in the Old City. We are not ready to give up just at the presence of armed people or bulldozers,” Balian said.

As important are the internal politics of the Armenian community. He questioned the dismissal of Yeretsian, saying defrocking him only forfeited the patriarchate’s ability to punish him. Before the deal had been formally cancelled, Balian said he rejected calls pushing for the resignation of the patriarch, as it would only set a precedent in which the patriarch can walk away from his responsibilities to the community.

Instead he believes the patriarchate, with its power and influence over the lives of Jerusalem Armenians, needs to bring in lay managers and integrate the community into its decision-making process, at least on mundane matters.

“We’re not saying that the community should decide on everything,” said Balian, “because you need that structure, you need that institution. It’s a religious institution, and we all belong to it. But let’s work together as a united front.”

In a divided Jerusalem, Balian said, what’s most important for his community is to stick together, no matter who is trying to encroach on their land.

“For us, it doesn’t even matter if it’s settlers or not, or if it’s Jews or Muslims or others. Our goal is to keep that land Armenian,” Balian said. 


https://www.sightmagazine.com.au/features/33543-jerusalem-armenian-christians-battle-developer-to-keep-control-of-their-corner-the-city

Armenia ready to take practical steps to implement Crossroads of Peace project

 15:05, 5 December 2023

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 5, ARMENPRESS. Armenia is ready to take practical steps to implement the Crossroads of Peace project, Chief of Staff of the Prime Minister’s Office Arayik Harutyunyan has said.

He said Armenia is guided by the principles of comprehensive, inclusive and non-discriminatory application of regional routes and full respect to the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the countries in the talks around unblocking of transport infrastructures in South Caucasus.

Harutyunyan said that the new possibilities of shipment of goods and movement of persons would in turn ensure additional guarantees of security and stability, as well as serious prerequisites for economic growth for all countries.

“Armenia is ready to take practical steps for the implementation of Crossroads of Peace. I’d also like to note that in implementing this important regional initiative, the Armenian government expects effective supports from all international partners,” Arayik Harutyunyan said at the New Regional Reality and the Crossroads of Peace forum in Yerevan.

Armenia believes in the regional peoples’ desire and ability to achieve peace and resolve all conflicts through peace, he said.

“Historically, Armenia has always been at the crossroads linking north to south and west to east, with all subsequent political, economic and cultural specificities. And today, given its geographic location, Armenia is ready to serve as a link for such partnership,” Harutyunyan said.

The New Regional Reality and the Crossroads of Peace forum in Yerevan was attended by Armenian officials, foreign diplomats, as well as analysts and researchers from Armenia, Georgia, Iran, India and Turkiye.

[see video]

Tbilisi as a venue for Azerbaijani-Armenian negotiations?

Dec 4 2023

Georgia has maintained a policy of neutrality for many years when it comes to the Karabakh conflict. Having acted as a mediator on certain occasions in the past, Tbilisi could now host talks that provide a proper solution to its neighbours’ ongoing dispute.

December 4, 2023 - Nicholas Chkhaidze

On his visit to Georgia in early October, the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev suggested that Tbilisi host negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan. This idea could be very appealing to Georgia in terms of re-establishing itself as an essential regional actor, which would also give the country the opportunity to assume more responsibility. This is something that Tbilisi has lacked since 2012. Tbilisi’s long-standing policy of non-irritation vis-à-vis Russia has harmed its regional status and the prospect of adopting a greater role in regional matters for more than a decade.

This proposal is voiced in the wake of statements made by the heads of state of Azerbaijan and Georgia. Overall, they stated that it is necessary for them to address the regional issues themselves and fundamentally remove the shackles of “spheres of influence”, which still loom over the South Caucasus like a dark cloud.

However, there is a certain hesitation from Yerevan to accept a new, Tbilisi-based negotiation format. Armenia’s reluctance to have Georgia broker a peace deal comes from its fear of not having a security guarantor now that the country has decided to change course away from being Russia’s vassal state. This is also why they have been looking westward, seeking states that would ensure their security. Armenian fears could be overcome if western states redirect their efforts to support the Tbilisi normalisation discussions and talk more vocally about the process.

As Baku and Yerevan are not that much interested in Russian involvement in resolving their dispute, with Azerbaijan increasingly disappointed with European mediation efforts, Tbilisi was considered a neutral peace broker that could potentially contribute to fostering dialogue and promoting peace between the other two small states in the South Caucasus.

Besides the geographical factor, Georgia has demonstrated its steadfast loyalty to a policy of neutrality when it comes to the conflict between its two neighbours. Even during the Second Karabakh War, Tbilisi decided to remain neutral and not strain relations with either side. This further cemented its position as an impartial peace broker with the legitimacy to contribute to the normalisation process.

Georgia also has a certain experience in mediating its neighbours’ disputes. Back in 2021, the country facilitated the release of 15 Armenian soldiers from Azerbaijan to Armenia, and subsequently, mediated Yerevan’s handover of the maps of minefields to Azerbaijan.

The recent meeting between the Georgian, Azerbaijani and Armenian prime ministers in Tbilisi as part of the “Tbilisi Silk Road Forum” is a promising sign. This is especially true regarding future perspectives for resolving regional issues by actors from within, not outside, the South Caucasus.

The present phase of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace talks has been ongoing since early 2021 but achieved little. This was mostly due to disagreements over the destiny of Karabakh’s Armenian inhabitants. However, after Azerbaijan had taken back its internationally recognised territories that were occupied by Armenia for over three decades, a new reality was established in the region.

The status quo currently includes the downgraded influence of Russia not only in Karabakh but also in Armenia, as Yerevan started looking towards the West considering Russia an unreliable partner. Armenia, which has been Moscow’s loyal strategic partner and totally dependent on security guarantees given by Russia, is now looking to gain western support to exert pressure on Azerbaijan. What the foreign policy elites in the West do not understand is that Russia cannot be removed from the South Caucasus if they rely on Armenia, which is ready to change its allies just in order to continue its feud with Azerbaijan.

What can really oust Russia from the South Caucasus is the completion of the bilateral peace process, preferably mediated by Tbilisi. In light of a globally destabilised landscape and numerous attempts to change the world order, it would be wise for the three small states in the South Caucasus not to get dragged into great power competition and the potential collateral damage that could result from this geopolitical struggle.

Not only would Tbilisi establish itself as a potential leader in the South Caucasus by being a host country for these peace talks, it would also send a message to its strategic partners in the West about being a valuable partner in the region. Tbilisi could subsequently help contain the expansion of irredentist and revisionist powers in its neighbourhood and further east. Furthermore, there would be no need for a “3+3 Format”, which is nothing more than an attempt by the three participating big powers to engage in the Cold War-era style establishment of spheres of influence.

Georgia does not have vast resources or significant leverage to facilitate these talks. However, its impartiality and the positive relations it has cultivated with both sides of the conflict, along with the recent decision of the European Parliament to recommend granting Tbilisi EU candidate status, will play a huge role in re-establishing Georgia’s major position in the South Caucasus. It will also revitalise their confidence in holding these peace talks. 

However, for such a reality to materialise in the South Caucasus, in terms of having a distinct geopolitical position that will give these three small states their long-cherished regional and potentially international significance, one should carefully assess the domestic political turbulence in Georgia with all its likely ramifications. It is also important to understand the ever-changing foreign policy priorities of Armenia, which could potentially undermine the peace talks, considering Baku’s priorities and its distrust of certain countries in the European Union.

Nicholas Chkhaidze is a Research Fellow at the Topchubashov Center, a think-tank based in Baku. He is focused on Russia, Ukraine, the South Caucasus, and Russian Private Military Companies. He obtained his Bachelor’s degree in International Relations with honors from the International Black Sea University. Previously, he has worked as a research assistant at the Henry Jackson Society’s “Russia and Eurasia Studies Centre” and at the Public Diplomacy Division of the NATO Liaison Office in Georgia. He is an alumnus of “The Fund for American Studies” 2021 Program.