Syrian Government Promised To Restore Electricity In Aleppo Within 4

SYRIAN GOVERNMENT PROMISED TO RESTORE ELECTRICITY IN ALEPPO WITHIN 48 HOURS: JIRAYR REISYAN

13:05, 18 December, 2012

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 18, ARMENPRESS: It is already the third day the
second largest city of Syria is left without electricity. The city
is in a deserted state. “Prime Minister Wael al-Halki, Ministers,
high ranking officials promised to carry out repair works within 48
hours and restore electricity in the city” Berio National Primacy
press secretary Jirayr Reisyan stated in the briefing with Armenpress.

All the problems and difficulties the city was facing were presented
to PM Wael al-Halki and Ministers in the course of the launched
meeting. The Government also promised to fetch bread from seaside
cities to Aleppo, make attempts to solve bread problem. Efforts are
being taken to solve the issues refer to fuel. Press secretary informs
means of communication also do not operate in a proper form. What
refers to the clashes orchestrated between Government loyal forces
and rebels, in the words of Reisyan bombing voices are heard from
time to time.

Over 40 thousand people were killed in the course of 21 months lasting
conflicts. Capital Damascus and Aleppo have suffered much. Parallel
to winter times problems, bread and apartment heating problems have
become more strained.

If I Were A Member Of The Republican Party In Armenia…

IF I WERE A MEMBER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ARMENIA…
BY MARIA TITIZIAN

Monday, December 17th, 2012 | Posted by Maria Titizian

Watching the Republican Party of Armenia’s (RPA) convention in
Yerevan on December 15 was reminiscent of an era not too long ago
when communist party members would hold up their membership cards en
masse rubber stamping the decisions of the Politburo. I couldn’t bear
to watch it for more than a few minutes at a time as it was being
broadcast live on H1, the country’s public television network. I
thought to myself that if I were a member of the RPA I would be
feeling a sense of shame and embarrassment at the condition of the
country and most importantly at the political farce taking place
ahead of the presidential elections.

Sadly, shame, embarrassment and accountability are absent in the
consciousness of most politicians in Armenia, perhaps around the
world. The critical difference is that politicians in the West
are more sophisticated and have much more finesse when it comes
to shielding their human shortcomings and personal wealth from the
public eye. Perhaps most wealthy politicians in the West acquired that
wealth prior to being in politics while others capitalized on their
connections while in public office to accentuate it. I don’t know. In
our country everything is a little more vulgar, a little more in your
face and executed with much less sophistication. The key difference is
that this is our country, our homeland, and our future so the crudeness
and the apparent lack of integrity are felt even more acutely.

Alas, trying to disengage, to ignore, to simply change the channel
and immerse oneself in ignorance is not always possible. Therefore I
spent most of the following morning reading the transcript of President
Serzh Sarkisian’s speech to the RPA convention where he was officially
nominated as the party’s candidate for the February 2013 presidential
elections. To be fair, I acknowledge how difficult it must be to lead a
country like ours that has to overcome a host of pressing challenges,
especially if you have come to power on a pyramid of patronage, and
to eliminate any impression that I am taking passages from his speech
out of context, let me say that had I not been living here, had I not
been an engaged citizen, I might have considered it to be an uplifting,
forward-looking speech. But I can’t. And for so many reasons.

Here are a few passages from President’s speech at the RPA convention:

“We were able to bring the country out of the financial and economic
crisis. We were able to ease the tax burden for small and medium
enterprises.” If we have navigated the country out of the financial
and economic crisis, how can the current rates of unemployment and
inflation be explained? According to an Armenia Now article published
in the summer of 2012, there are more than 100,000 small and medium
enterprises (SME) in Armenia of which only 20 percent contribute to
the state budget while the rest are simply on paper “with no economic
activities.” The SMEs that do have economic activity in the country are
constrained by a number of factors including the tight lending criteria
of Armenian banks that focus their lending on larger corporations
and by questionable market competitiveness. And while easing the tax
burden for SMEs might seem promising on paper, in practice they are
the center of attention of tax inspectors who always manage to turn
a blind eye to the larger, more powerful and politically-connected
business enterprises that skillfully practice alleged tax evasion.

“We were able to save thousands of jobs in the mining and construction
sectors; provide a serious impetus to the creation of new jobs in
food production and light industry; were able to keep our financial
system intact; were able to do things that even much more powerful
countries failed to accomplish.” Granted, Armenia’s banking system
did not collapse and we still continue to have economic performance,
the question remains as to where all those new jobs are and why people
continue to leave the country in the tens of thousands citing economic
insecurity and a lack of faith in the future.

“We brought modern, high-quality medical service to the marzes
of Armenia; created guarantees for a dignified old age for working
citizens through the introduction of a new funded pension system.” If
the president says that they brought modern, high-quality medical
services to the regions of the country, I believe him but it might
have been more efficient if they were able to ensure that qualified
doctors and nurses came along with those services as there is a
serious shortfall of medical personnel, especially in remote areas.

The majority of pensioners today live below the poverty line, they
can’t afford to heat their homes in the cold winter months and neither
do they live a dignified life. By privatizing the country’s pension
plan, what guarantees do workers under the age of 40 (who must take
part in the new pension system to be introduced in 2014) have against
severe market fluctuations when they turn 65 and find that their
pension fund is no longer viable? Will they have to depend on state
hand-outs to ensure that they receive the minimum benefit to survive?

“We have started, step by step, to marginalize the corruption and abuse
that were getting rooted in our country for decades. We encouraged and
promoted young and well-educated politicians and statesmen.” I would
like to know what those steps are, and when does this administration
expect to muster the political will to implement them? And yes, there
are several young and well-educated politicians today in parliament
and in the executive from RPA ranks who for some reason are always
ready to act like arrogant schoolyard bullies against all those who
deign to express their opinion of the ruling regime.

“We have commenced reforms in the most complex and important areas,
starting with the police and the judiciary. We demanded that our police
serve the people in a new way, conscientiously.” Then why are there so
many unsolved murder cases, why do the police continue to take bribes
(and this includes traffic police) and can we conscientiously say
that the judiciary is free and independent?

The president acknowledges that while there has been “noticeable
change in the country” over the past five years, it has not been
enough and yet he goes on to say: “We have been able to make Armenia
incomparably more attractive for businesses and a more dependable
country for investments.” According to the U.S. State Department’s
2012 Investment Climate Statement while the Armenian government
asserts that it welcomes foreign investment and the country is
considered a place to do business according to some global indices,
Armenia’s “investment climate poses several significant challenges:
a population of just three million; relative geographic isolation…per
capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of about $3,000; and high levels of
corruption in both official and commercial spheres. Foreign businesses
must frequently contend with tax and customs processes that lack
transparency and add to costs; the court system lacks independence,
making it an unreliable forum for resolution of disputes… Major
sectors of Armenia’s economy are controlled by well-connected
businessmen-some of them members of parliament or other high-ranking
officials-who enjoy government-protected market dominance. This raises
barriers to new entrants, limits consumer choice, and discourages
investments by multinational firms that insist on partnering with
politically-independent businesses. The [Armenian government] has
also on occasion deployed government agencies, including the tax and
customs services, against political opponents.”

“All our steps are directed toward the people, toward the citizens of
Armenia. All our efforts are for the people, our compatriots, their
well-being. We have never followed parochial partisan objectives.”

This one doesn’t require any further commentary.

“The organization and conduct of good, fair elections is our first
and foremost priority. We have received excellent reactions to our
latest parliamentary elections. It is inspiring. Today as a state,
we are capable of conducting elections based on free competition, near
absolute freedom of expression and unrestricted expression of will.”

Perhaps the president’s speech writer forgot to mention the critical
role voter bribes played during the May 2012 parliamentary elections.

An article that appeared on RFERL states: “The May 6 parliamentary
ballot failed, however, to measure up to those expectations. Indeed,
in two key respects it appears to have been more seriously flawed
than the previous parliamentary election in 2007…There were numerous
reports of vote-buying by the HHK [RPA].”

“This is the Armenia, which is watched by millions of Armenians
living abroad. They watch us with hope, desire and anticipation of
positive changes. Sometimes, we are watched through a magnifying glass;
they rejoice and despair with us, and they are right. The power of
the Motherland is a great power.” This administration’s continuing
support of the oligarchy, its inability to establish the rule of law
and social justice coupled with complacency by the general public makes
me wonder if 2013 will be a year to rejoice. As a Diaspora Armenian,
as a repatriate, a dual citizen, a person who has put her faith in this
country, I am so ready to rejoice because like every other Armenian,
I am so tired of despairing. Like most people I have little faith
that anything will change following the presidential elections in
February but that doesn’t mean I’ve lost hope because the power of
the Motherland sustains me, at least for the time being.

http://asbarez.com/107183/if-i-were-a-member-of-the-republican-party-in-armenia%E2%80%A6/

Haut-Karabagh: Le Groupe De Minsk Appelle A Relancer Le Processus De

HAUT-KARABAGH: LE GROUPE DE MINSK APPELLE A RELANCER LE PROCESSUS DE PAIX

Publie le : 18-12-2012

Info Collectif VAN – – Le Collectif VAN vous
invite a lire cette newsletter bimensuelle sur l’actualite politique,
economique et culturelle du Haut-Karabagh mise a notre disposition
par la Representation de la Republique du Haut-Karabagh en France.

Representation du Haut-Karabagh en France

La troïka du Groupe de Minsk appelle les parties en conflit a relancer
les negociations de paix lors du sommet de Dublin de l’OSCE

Reunis a Dublin lors du sommet ministeriel de l’OSCE, les ministres des
affaires etrangères des Etats-Unis et de Russie, ainsi que le ministre
francais delegue aux affaires europeennes ont signe une declaration
commune appelant les parties du conflit entre l’Azerbaïdjan et le
Haut-Karabagh a deployer des efforts en vue de relancer le processus
de paix. La declaration de Dublin ne menage aucune des parties,
qu’il semble renvoyer dos a dos alors meme que le ministre azeri se
faisait l’echo dans la presse de la politique maximaliste de Bakou.

C’est un veritable rappel a l’ordre, sinon une mise en demeure, qu’ont
adresse aux Armeniens et Azeis, les ministres des affaires etrangères
des Etats-Unis, Hillary Clinton et de Russie Sergueï Lavrov, ainsi
que le ministre francais delegue aux affaires europeennes, Bernard
Cazenave, dans une declaration commune signee le 6 decembre lors de la
reunion ministerielle annuelle de l’OSCE a Dublin. Les representants
des trois puissances n’ont menage aucune des parties, qu’ils ont
appelees a s’engager au plus vite sur la voie d’un règlement du conflit
du Karabagh, dans le droit fil de l’appel lance le 18 juin dernier
par les presidents francais, americain et russe a Los Cabos au Mexique.

Les espoirs d’un règlement proche tels qu’ils avaient ete suscites
par la declaration commune des presidents d’Armenie et d’Azerbaïdjan,
sous l’egide de la Russie, le 23 janvier 2012, ont ete decus, souligne
le texte, qui reproche a la partie armenienne comme a l’Azerbaïdjan
de chercher a tirer profit du processus de negociations au lieu de
s’engager sur la voie d’un compromis. La declaration commune de
Dublin semble vouloir renvoyer dos a dos les parties, quand elle
les appelle a “eviter les actions et declarations encourageant les
sentiments d’animosite parmi les populations, a l’origine des tensions
observees au cours des derniers mois”. L’Azerbaïdjan, qui avait suscite
l’indignation de la communaute internationale avec l’affaire Safarov,
n’a pas ete cite, meme s’il est de toute evidence vise par de telles
accusations.

Parallèlement, le ministre azeri des Affaires etrangères signait dans
l’edition du 6 decembre du Wall Street Journal, un requisitoire contre
le Karabagh et les Armeniens. Sorte de tribune libre a l’attention
des participants du sommet de Dublin, cet article enrobe la politique
maximaliste de Bakou. Se presentant comme un pacifiste, M. Mammadyarov
en appelle a un règlement du conflit qui passe par deux conditions
fort simples selon lui : le retrait des forces armeniennes du Karabagh
et le retour de ce dernier dans le giron de l’Azerbaïdjan.

Un discours qui ne devrait tromper personne et surtout pas le
diplomate armenien Chavarche Kotcharian qui, dans sa reponse aux
propos du chef de la diplomatie azerie, renvoie le regime de Bakou
a ses responsabilites dans la politique discriminatoire menee a
l’encontre des Armeniens, chasses de tout l’Azerbaïdjan a coups
de pogromes de 1988 a 1990 et dont seule la resistance armee a pu
preserver les Armeniens du Karabagh. La solution simpliste prônee
par M. Mamadyarov oublie que le Karabagh, qui s’est constitue en
une Republique democratique pendant les annees de guerre et de
blocus, ne peut envisager de revenir sous la tutelle d’un pays qui
s’efforce encore aujourd’hui d’effacer toute trace de leur presence,
en encourageant les sentiments de haine a l’encontre des Armeniens
dans le peuple azeri, souligne M. Kotcharian.

Retour a la rubrique

Source/Lien : Representation du Haut-Karabagh en France

http://www.collectifvan.org/article.php?r=0&id=69878
www.collectifvan.org

Fej : La Conference De Presse De Ragip Zarakolu a Bruxelles

FEJ : LA CONFERENCE DE PRESSE DE RAGIP ZARAKOLU A BRUXELLES

Info Collectif VAN – – Après Paris où il a donne
une conference a l’EHESS, l’opposant turc Ragip Zarakolu est invite
a la conference de presse organisee par la Federation europeenne
des journalistes (FEJ) a Bruxelles. Elle se tiendra le mercredi 19
decembre 2012 a 11 heures, avec pour thème : “Liberte de la presse
et liberte d’expression : qu’est-ce qui ne va pas avec la Turquie ?”.

Avec Ragip Zarakolu (chroniqueur turc, ecrivain, editeur) et Philippe
Leruth (journaliste belge, vice-president de la FEJ).

International Federation of Journalists – Belgium

Belgique

14 decembre 2012

Les debats de la Federation europeenne des journalistes (FEJ) sur
le thème de la liberte de la presse et de la liberte d’expression
en Turquie

La Federation europeenne des journalistes (FEJ) organise une conference
de presse sur le thème “Liberte de la presse et liberte d’expression :
qu’est-ce qui ne va pas avec la Turquie ?”, le mercredi 19 decembre
2012, a 11 heures, avec Ragip Zarakolu (chroniqueur turc, ecrivain,
editeur) et Philippe Leruth (journaliste belge, vice-president de la
FEJ) au Residence Palace (rue de la Loi, 144 – 1040 Bruxelles).

Journaliste et editeur Ragip Zarakolu a ete harcele toute sa vie par
les autorites turques. Il a commence a ecrire au lendemain de ses
etudes, en 1968 pour des magazines tels que Ant et Yeni Ufuklar qui
ont mis l’accent sur les questions de justice sociale en Turquie.

Trois ans plus tard, en 1971, après le coup d’Etat, il est emprisonne
pendant trois ans pour ses articles. En 1977, il fonde avec sa femme
Ayse Nur la maison d’edition Belge qui sera soumise a la censure. Les
bureaux de Zarakolu ont ete incendies par un groupe extremiste de
droite en 1995.

En depit de nombreuses procedures judiciaires et de son recent
emprisonnement dans le cadre du procès KCK, il continue a ecrire
des articles pour des quotidiens tels que Birgun, Evrensel et Ozgur
Gundem. Il est egalement president du comite ” Liberte de publier ” de
l’Union des editeurs de Turquie (TYB) et membre de l’Association des
editeurs internationaux (IPA-International Publishers’ Association)
du meme comite. En 2007, l’association des journalistes turcs l’a
recompense pour sa defense de la liberte d’expression.

Plus tôt en octobre 2011, le FEJ a condamne l’arrestation de
Ragip Zarakolu avec 40 autres personnes lors d’une vaste operation
“anti-terrorisme” appelee ” KCK ” menee par des unites de forces
speciales turques. En tant qu’invite special et temoin, M. Zarakolu va
parler de cette situation preoccupante en Turquie pour les journalistes
et les ecrivains d’aujourd’hui.

Informations pratiques :

Liberte de la presse et liberte d’expression : qu’est-ce qui ne va
pas avec la Turquie ?”

L’ecrivain turc Ragip Zarakolu debats avec Philippe Leruth,
vice-president de la FEJ Animee par le journaliste independant
Mehmet Koksal

Langue du debat : anglais (traduction non disponible)

Adresse :

Residence Palace – Rez-de-chaussee – Salle Polak Rue de la Loi, 144 –
1040 Bruxelles de 11 h a 12h30

Plus d’informations sur les pages de la FEJ :

La FEJ est le groupe europeen de la Federation internationale des
journalistes.

La FEJ represente plus de 300.000 journalistes dans 37 pays.

Traduction Collectif VAN – 15 decembre 2012 – 07:00 –

mardi 18 decembre 2012, Stephane ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=85442
http://europe.ifj.org/en/pages/turkey-campaign-set-journalists-free
http://www.facebook.com/pages/European-Federation-of-Journalists-EFJ-/157478517604323
www.collectifvan.org
www.collectifvan.org

Le Hrw Denonce La Nomination D’un Juge Controverse Comme Premier Omb

LE HRW DENONCE LA NOMINATION D’UN JUGE CONTROVERSE COMME PREMIER OMBUDSMAN DE LA TURQUIE
Stephane

armenews.com
mardi 18 decembre 2012

Human Rights Watch (HRW) a saute dans le train pour critiquer la
nomination de Mehmet Nihat Omeroðlu comme premier ombudsman de la
Turquie, appelant le gouvernement a reconsiderer la nomination si elle
” est serieux au sujet de la creation d’une institution de l’ombudsman
qui defend les droits des citoyens “.

Mehmet Nihat Omeroðlu, ancien membre de la Cour de Cassation, a ete
l’un des juges de la cour superieure qui a approuve la decision d’un
tribunal local contre Hrant Dink journaliste sur des accusations de ”
insulte a la turcite ” conformement a l’article 301 du Code penal turc
(TCK), qui a ete modifie par la suite.

Hrant Dink a ete abattu par un jeune ultranationaliste devant le
journal Agos, dont il etait le redacteur en chef, en 2007.

Au cours de la semaine ecoulee Mehmet Nihat Omeroðlu a publiquement
declare au journal Yeni Safak que l’ecrit de Hrant Dink ” constituait
une violation flagrante de l’article 301 ” et au journal Radikal que ”
[nous] avons pris la decision sur cette affaire sur la base de notre
conscience “.

Selon le HRW, la nomination d’Omeroðlu en tant que mediateur en
chef de l’institution de l’ombudsman de Turquie risque d’affecter
l’efficacite de la nouvelle institution.

Selon Emma Sinclair-Webb, chercheuse pour la Turquie au HRW ” Si le
gouvernement est serieux au sujet de la creation d’une institution de
l’ombudsman qui defend les droits des citoyens, il devrait reconsiderer
cette nomination “.

mardi 18 decembre 2012, Stephane ©armenews.com

Le père expulsé en Arménie, la mère dans l’attente

Ouest-France
samedi 15 décembre 2012
nantes Edition

Le père expulsé en Arménie, la mère dans l’attente

Gros soulagement hier pour Aïda Harutunyan. Convoquée à la préfecture,
où elle s’est rendue soutenue par un comité de soutien et accompagnée
de son avocate, elle craignait qu’on lui délivre une Obligation de
quitter le territoire. Ce ne fut pas le cas. Cette mère de famille
arménienne a déposé entre-temps une demande de titre de séjour, à
laquelle la préfecture n’a pas encore répondu.

« Ma fille qui est au collège va pouvoir retourner en classe. Elle ne
risque plus d’être interpellée par la police ».Le père a été expulsé
fin novembre vers l’Arménie. Alors que ce dernier souffre d’une
hépatite C, le médecin de l’Agence régionale de santé avait pourtant
donné un avis favorable pour qu’il obtienne une carte de séjour pour
raison de santé afin de bénéficier d’un traitement adapté.« Il veut
revenir et cherche à obtenir un passeport ce qui est très compliqué »,
confiait sa femme hier.

ISTANBUL: Minorities `given entire asset rights’

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Dec 15 2012

Minorities `given entire asset rights’

ISTANBUL – Hürriyet Daily News
by Vercihan ZiflioÄ?lu

Turkey’s Foundations Directorate General has organized a seminar on
new regulations regarding minority foundations.

Held in Galata Greek School in Istanbul on Dec. 13, the seminar titled
`The Legal Condition of the Minority Foundations’ was the first of its
kind in the Republican period.

Foundations Directorate General’s Chief Inspector Okan Saydam, the
foundations’ Istanbul 1st Region deputy head Ebru Günaydın and Laki
Vingas, who is in charge of minority foundations in the Directorate,
were present at the seminar. Also, representatives of minority
communities, including Armenian, Greek, Syriac and Jewish foundations
showed a great interest in the seminar.

Saydam spoke to the Hürriyet Daily News about the latest developments
the Directorate is working on. He said they cancelled the elective
regulation of minority foundations and were working on a new one,
which would be announced soon.

`Many law cases were opened to the elective processes of some
foundations. Administrators could resist holding an election. Also,
voter lists were not organized in an effective way. The new elective
regulation we are working on will prevent such problems,’ Saydam said.

`From now on, minority foundations will be able to invest in the stock
market and they will be able to sell and buy stock certificates as
long as they inform the Foundations Directorate General,’ Saydam said.

With the new Foundation Law that came into effect in August 2011, a
one-year period was given for the minority foundations to receive back
their property. According to Vingas, 1,560 appeals were made for
property return by Armenian, Greek, Jewish, and Syriac communities
within this period. Vingas also remarked on the new elective
regulation, saying they hoped the problems on election matters to be
solved with the new system. Vingas, who is of Greek origin, also spoke
specifically on the problems of Greek community foundations. `The
population of the Greek community is very low, so we have problems in
terms of administration,’ Vingas said.

December/15/2012

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/minorities-given-entire-asset-rights.aspx?pageID=238&nID=36898&NewsCatID=339

Boxing: Abraham beats Bouadla to retain WBO belt

Charlotte Observer- NC
Dec 16 2012

Abraham beats Bouadla to retain WBO belt

Associated Press

NUREMBERG, Germany Arthur Abraham of Germany successfully defended his
WBO super middleweight title with a technical knockout over Mehdi
Bouadla of France in the eighth round Saturday night.

Abraham dominated until American referee Mark Nelson stepped in to
stop the one-sided contest 2:11 into the eighth round when Bouadla’s
vision was impeded by streaming blood from repeated left and right
blows.

“This is where I started boxing. To be here now, in front of 10,000
people as world champion – there’s no better feeling,” Abraham said
after his first defense of the title he won on points from Robert
Stieglitz in Berlin in August.

“We have only one recipe – to win. But I have to say that he never
gave up. He kept going to the end, and he punched hard. 2012 was a
great year. I became world champion. I’m very happy.”

Abraham (35-3, 28 KO), an Armenia-born German, had been in such
control that he received a telling off from his coach after the fourth
round for his gung-ho approach.

“It’s not necessary,” Ulli Wegner told the 32-year-old, who continued
where he left off in the next rounds.

Nelson stopped the fight briefly in the seventh so the doctor could
examine the cut beside Bouadla’s right eye.

The 30-year-old challenger (26-5, 11 KO) was allowed to continue, but
offered nothing against Abraham’s bombardment and Nelson eventually
did the humane thing.

“He boxed very well. He deservedly held onto his title,” Bouadla said.
“He boxed like a champion. I’m a competitive boxer, I tried
everything, so there’s nothing to be ashamed of. It was fair enough
that the referee stopped the fight. (Abraham) boxed with a lot of
power, with a lot of pressure. I thought I could catch him on a
counter, but he was very good.”

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/12/15/3728447/abraham-beats-bouadla-to-retain.html

Turkish-Armenian Relations and Public Opinion

Diplomatic Courier
Dec 16 2012

Turkish-Armenian Relations and Public Opinion

Posted on December 15, 2012

– By Vahram Ayvazyan

Recent political developments in the historical Asia Minor and
Trans-Caucasia region beg the question: are state governments the
right institutions to rely on and work with to puzzle out the
overarching challenges the nations are facing concomitantly?

Ongoing dramatic changes in the Middle East in general, and in the
South Caucasus in particular, pose a threat to a peaceful coexistence
within the region. For decades, the Turkish government has been in a
perpetual state of genocide denial, while a series of blunders and
miscalculations made by the Armenian and Turkish governments vis-à-vis
regional policy have sparked tensions. While governments refuse to
cooperate on such issues, direct dialogue between people of Armenia
and Turkey on the one hand, and between the Armenian diaspora and
Turkish diaspora on the other hand, must be a long-term strategy.
Closed borders and current glacial Turkish-Armenian relations
notwithstanding, dialogue and better future are attainable goals.

First and foremost, a tremendous gap exists between true public
opinion and a so-called `published opinion’ in quasi-democratic states
and in states in transition. Turkish government officials deny the
early 20th century conflict resulted in a genocide of Armenians, but
have not yet succeeding in filling that vacuum with `adequate
alternative stories.’ They have not yet grasped that media and
information can no longer be controlled by the state, and the the
drastic development of information and communication technologies
within Turkey and outside its borders is gradual, but constantly
changing perceptions of history among ordinary Turks. How long will
the Turkish government succeed in keeping official denial dominant
over the real public opinion? It is only a matter of time.

Yet it is civil society organizations, think-tanks, and NGOs that can
harness the power of ordinary citizens and make their voice heard in
the decision-making processes of governments. Turkish society feels as
though it is on the threshold of a new life. Many Turks are keen on
facing their own history and entering into dialogue with Armenians,
but their thirst for change is hampered by that policy of published
opinion-imposing the Turkish government’s denial on Turkish citizens.
It is of utmost significance to engage as many Turkish students,
academics, civil society servants, activists, and ordinary citizens as
possible in dialogue with their Armenian colleagues that will spur an
increase in public awareness of their own history among Turks, as well
as more independence and leverage vis-à-vis their government. Despite
a number of successful projects, more must be done by both sides.

What do Armenians and Turks need for a future of coexistence? The
answer is clear: Armenians need recognition in order recovering from
psychological trauma and dishonor, as well as peaceful coexistence
rather than perpetual unease between two people. Turks need
recognition for a modernizing and democratizing Turkey for entering in
a new era where coexistence replaces enmity, where Turkish society
will be robust enough to overcome 21st century’s challenges. Both
Armenians and Turks need to assure themselves that public opinion will
win a decisive victory over state-led published opinion and open new
horizons for two people.

The 100th anniversary (1915-2015) of the Armenian Genocide is fast
approaching. It could prove to be a major breakthrough in genocide
recognition and Armenian-Turkish Dialogue.

Vahram Ayvazyan is a 2012 graduate of the Genocide and Human Rights
University Program at the International Institute for Genocide and
Human Rights Studies in Toronto.

http://www.diplomaticourier.com/blog/2012/12/turkish-armenian-relations-and-public-opinion/

EU: Nagorny Karabach Requires Restraint and Political Tact

Standart News, Bulgaria
Dec 15 2012

EU: Nagorny Karabach Requires Restraint and Political Tact

Krasimira Temelkova
Reporter of The Standart
Erevan

We have sent a very resolute and unequivocal message on behalf of all
three of us to prevent any actions that could exacerbate the situation
in Nagorny Karabach, Foreign Minister Nikolay Mladenov declared in
Erevan. Armenia is the third and the last stop in his tour of the
Southern Caucasus. His colleagues – Carl Bildt of Sweden and Radoslav
Sikorski of Poland – discussed the mounting tension in the belligerent
province with their Armenian counterpart Edward Nalbandian. Mladenov
underscored that urgent measures should be taken towards easing up
tension in Nagorny Karabach. It is of paramount importance that from
now on both Armenia and Azerbaijan should avoid political rhetoric and
actions that could add fuel to the smouldering conflict and provoke
its escalation, Bulgaria’s No.1 Diplomat stressed. He and his foreign
colleagues have also discussed the liberalization of visa regime
between Armenia and EU and the conflict in Syria that has triggered
migration of eight thousand Armenians living in Syria to Armenia.
Erevan, on its part, will lift visas for the EU citizens as of January
1, 2013.Yesterday, Mladenov, Bildt and Sikorski met with President of
Armenia Serj Sargsyan and PM Tigran Sargsyan as had talks with the
Opposition. Patriarch Ilia II of Georgia also received the high
delegation and said he had sent his special envoys to the burial
ceremony of late Patriarch Maxim.

http://paper.standartnews.com/en/article.php?d12-12-15&article=40804