BAKU: Under Occupation: Agdam Computer Game Presented In Baku

UNDER OCCUPATION: AGDAM COMPUTER GAME PRESENTED IN BAKU

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
Oct 8 2013

8 October 2013, 20:20 (GMT+05:00)

By Nigar Orujova

The second part of the first Azerbaijani 3D shooter computer game,
Under Occupation: Agdam, was presented in Baku on October 7.

Under Occupation: Shusha game about Azerbaijan’s Nagorno-Karabakh
territories under Armenian occupation was first presented to the
Azerbaijani public in June 2012. The game was created by the youth
initiative group AzDimension.

While the first game’s missions took place in the ancient Shusha city,
the second game, which will be available in the next two weeks, will
represent Agdam city, precisely depicted by AzDimension from old
photos and maps. Thus, the group created a 3-dimension map of the city.

Agdam is abandoned and was ruined by Armenian troops during the
1990s war, with only one construction that is left, which is an old
Agdam mosque. It was once a city with 50,000 residents with developed
infrastructure, including winemaking, machine building plants and a
railway station.

Nine missions, including a tank battle, will take place in the ghost
city streets, a military base, and a bazaar. The main goal of the
game is to liberate the city from the occupation.

The game has two time lines – the early 1990s, when the city was
occupied (June 1993), and a virtual future whereby Azerbaijani soldiers
fight to liberate the city.

The second game by AzDimension is outstanding in terms of improved
graphics and new special effects.

The game also includes modern Azerbaijani weapons, such as “Istiglal”,
“Zafar”, “T-90” and “Marauder”.

The game is being created in the frame of the implementation of the
state youth program for 2011-2015 and the ICT Year in Azerbaijan.

Under occupation: Agdam is expected to provide an opportunity
to explore the history of the country and positively affect the
military-patriotic education of Azerbaijani youth.

The AzDimension group includes eight young Azerbaijani programmers,
3D designers and visual effect artists, who created this national
“Call of Duty”. The music for the game was specially written by
composer Agshin Alizade.

According to the head of the development group, Farid Haqverdiyev,
their previous game was welcomed by the local youth.

In the next stage, it was decided to make the game more professional
and interesting. “The biggest difficulty was to create the game in
a one-year period,” he said.

Farid, who has played computer games since his childhood, while being
a student decided to create a game about Azerbaijani realities.

Now Farid is keen to continue creating shooter games.

Speaking at the presentation, Deputy Youth and Sports Minister Intigam
Babayev said Agdam, which was ruined by Armenian invaders, is on the
list of the 20 ghost cities of the world. Babayev expressed belief
that along with the other occupied Azerbaijani regions Agdam will
soon be liberated and removed from the list.

According to Babayev, designing games on historical themes will be
continued, and another computer game is expected to be presented by
the year-end.

Deputy ICT Minister Elmir Velizade praised this youth initiative and
urged to implement such projects in the future. The ICT minister is
supporting this process, he said.

This free-of-charge game will be soon available at
www.isgalaltında.com and

Armenia occupied over 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s internationally
recognized territory, including Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent
regions, after laying territorial claims against its South Caucasus
neighbor that had caused a lengthy war in the early 1990s. The UN
Security Council has adopted four resolutions on Armenian withdrawal,
but they have not been enforced to this day.

http://www.azernews.az/azerbaijan/60452.html
www.facebook.com/AzDimension.

Ashton Meets Armenian Foreign Minister Ahead Of Vilnius Summit

ASHTON MEETS ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER AHEAD OF VILNIUS SUMMIT

ENPI, Europe
Oct 8 2013

EU High Representative Catherine Ashton met Foreign Minister of
Armenia, Edward Nalbandian in Brussels today, discussing bilateral
relations between the EU and Armenia as well as the preparations for
the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius at the end of November,
according to a statement from Ashton’s spokesperson.

“The High Representative stressed that the European Union remains
committed to deepening relations with Armenia in all areas that are
compatible with Armenia’s recently announced new commitments to the
Customs Union,” the statement said.

Ashton was “pleased to hear from the Minister that Armenia remains
determined to further the relations with the EU and that it
will continue with reform efforts”, the statement concluded. (EU
Neighbourhood Info)

http://enpi-info.eu/maineast.php?id=34730&id_type=1&lang_id=450

Beirut, We Have A Problem

BEIRUT, WE HAVE A PROBLEM

The Sunday Telegraph (London)
October 6, 2013

During the Sixties, America and the USSR competed for supremacy of the
solar system. But history has overlooked a third space race contestant
– a group of seven students at a university in Lebanon

by Alex Hannaford

A few years before they became the first Arabs to send a rocket into
space, the members of the Haigazian College science club, in Beirut,
encountered a problem. They had the materials to build a craft –
some of which they’d bought with their own pocket money – but they
still hadn’t produced a propellant.

The first suggestion had been gunpowder but experiments on a couple
of 12in-long cardboard rockets had resulted in explosions rather than
the perfect chemical reaction required to send a vessel several miles
into the sky.

Then, after more lab work and guidance from their teacher, a brilliant
young maths and physics lecturer called Manoug Manougian, they’d
decided the solution was a mixture of zinc and sulphur. But they’d
still not worked out the correct proportions.

The chemicals would burn, but they needed to find a combination that
would give the rocket enough thrust. Manougian was also aware they
couldn’t possibly test it in their physics lab. They’d require space;
somewhere away from people. The family of one of the students owned
a farm in the mountains, and over the course of several weekends,
Manougian and his team went up there to experiment. Finally, they came
up with something that would generate enough energy to make their
2ft-tall rocket move. That first craft, called HCRS (for Haigazian
College Rocket Society) and launched from the back of a rod stuck in
the ground, climbed to 1,200 metres.

“We have something,” Manougian thought. It was 1961 and the Soviet
Union and the United States were four years into a dramatic space
race which had begun with the former’s launch of the Sputnik satellite
in 1957. But while millions of words have been written about the two
superpowers’ attempts to gain supremacy of the solar system, precious
little has been said about a third, highly unlikely, competitor.

Between 1961 and 1966, Manougian and his group of seven undergraduates
ended up building 12 solid-fuel rockets – one of them so powerful
it reached the thermosphere, now home to the International Space
Station, and became national heroes in Lebanon. Now, thanks to a
new documentary, their extraordinary achievements – instigated by
Manougian as an interesting way to teach his students basic principles
of physics and maths – are finally being recognised by the rest of
the world. The film, The Lebanese Rocket Society, is also a poignant
reminder of what could have been in a country that has been ravaged
by war in the intervening years.

“We wanted to make a film about dreamers,” says the Lebanese
co-director Joana Hadjithomas. “We needed to understand what kind of
dreams people have had for our region.”

Manougian has lived and worked in the US for a long time now –
currently as a mathematics professor at the Univer-sity of South
Florida. Armenian by blood, he was born in the Old City of Jerusalem in
1935, but 10 years later his parents relocated to Jericho in theWest
Bank to escape the conflict between Jews and Palestinians. It was
around this time that he read Jules Verne’s novel From the Earth to
the Moon, a gift from his uncle which he refers to as “the genesis
of my fascination with science, rockets and space exploration”. As
a child with little else to do,Manougian would climb to the top of
Mount Quarantania – said to be the Biblical “Mount of Temptation” –
and look out over the vastness of the land around him and upwards
to the stars wondering why he couldn’t fly to the moon. “The idea
was fascinating,” he says. “And I realised there shouldn’t be any
boundary as to where we could go in the universe.” After graduating
from St George’s School, Jerusalem, he deferred a scholarship to
study at the University of Texas at Austin in order to help prepare
other St George’s students for their exams in maths, physics and
chemistry. His future wife, Josette Masson, was one of those students,
and in 1956 the pairfinally headed to the US – Masson to Ohio for work,
and Manougian to Texas to further his studies.

In 1959, Manougian visited Masson in Cleveland, spending the summer
working in the city’s steel mills. After a strike closed the mill,
his boss told him to keep busy and Manougian took the opportunity
to design and build his first single-stage rocket. With no way of
accessing propellent, he knew he’d have to wait until he got back to
Lebanon to launch it.

The following year, in Jerusalem,Manougian and Masson married and that
autumn he joined the faculty of Haigazian College in Beirut. Many
of his students were the children of survivors of the 1915 Armenian
genocide, whose parents had moved to Lebanon to escape the atrocities.

The American University of Beirut was the country’s leading educational
institution at the time but even it wasn’t known for science and
technology. “During the Sixties there was calm, politically, and
Lebanon was happy producing businesspeople and doctors from the
university’s medical school, but in terms of science not much was
happening,” says Manougian. “There were few research projects.”

The young lecturer was asked to head up the student science club at
Haigazian; he immediately set them the task of building a rocket. He
was, he says, driven by two challenges: first, to realise his dream
of designing and launching multistage rockets, and, second, to get
his students excited about science, technology, engineering and maths.

After the success of the first HCRS rocket in April 1961, Manougian
and his team altered the position of the fins and re-constructed the
nose cone of the rocket to give it better thrust. Again, they went
up to the top of the mountain.

“Across from us was a valley; no villages, no houses,” Manougian
recalls, “so I figured it was safe to launch in that direction. My
entire concern was getting this thing off the ground.” This time,
though, instead of going where he had anticipated, the rocket zoomed
off behind the assembled dignitaries and students. “The entire student
body, the president [of Haigazian College] and everyone else just
stood there looking from the top of the mountain to see where it was
going to land,” Manougian says.

“It was made of metal and I was so worried it could hurt somebody.Then
I noticed this crowd coming out of a Greek Orthodox church, and
suddenly part of the rocket stuck in one of the rocks in front of
the building.” Luckily nobody was injured. But after that, Manougian
received a message from someone in the Lebanese government saying that
future rockets could only be launched from specially designated launch
pads. He was offered the use of Mount Sannine, an 8,500ft summit in
the Mount Lebanon range used by the country’s military. “They even
offered to send a jeep to carry our equipment,” Manougian says. With
the loan of a mountain, his next challenge was to launch a multi-stage
rocket that would separate in flight and travel a lot further –
up to 10 miles.

Budget was an issue from the beginning: where Nasa would spend
$23billion on its manned space programmes in the Sixties, and the
Soviet Union between $5 and $10billion, for the six years of its
existence, the Haigazian College Rocket Society project cost around
$300,000,Manougian estimates. Nasa, of course, was attempting to
land a man on the moon, not merely to send a rocket on a suborbital
flight, but nevertheless, in contrast with the space agency’s 400,000
employees, Manougian had seven students who hadn’t yet graduated, at
a tiny university in a country with a population of barely two million.

Manougian spent part of his own salary on rocket parts; he pulled a
favour from a fellow Armenian living in Beirut who provided the metal
tubes needed to manufacture the rocket’s shell and he also welded them
for free. “[The Armenian community] became so excited that here was
an Armenian guy and an Armenian college doing something that nobody
else in the Middle East was doing,” he says. He was also offered the
expertise of Lebanese Army captain Joseph Wehbe, whose speciality
was ballistics. Perhaps naively, Manougian says his excitement seemed
to circumvent any doubts he may have had that the army was using his
society’s intrepid technological adventures for its own ends.

The challenge for Manougian was to devise a solution so that all the
propellent in the first stage was exhausted before the second stage
ignited and separated. “I remember waking up in the middle of the
night,”Manougian says. “Josette asked what the hell was going on and
I said I’ve figured it out: I needed to place a battery in between
the two rockets. And as long as the first stage is not generating any
acceleration – because it’s run out of propellent – it will slow down
for a fraction of a second, forcing the second stage to ignite. It
was so simple.” The difference between a single-stage rocket and a
two-stage rocket was vast. As Manougian puts it: it went from “kids
doing these interesting things to a viable rocket which wasn’t a toy.”

Suddenly, the society’s work was not just some university sideline
but a project of national import and, in August 1961, Manougian
and his students were invited to meet the thenpresident of Lebanon,
Fouad Chehab.

“He said he was very proud that such scientific experiments were
being done in his country – and he ended up saying he was going to
support us financially.”

Manougian says he was nervous that the financial aid being discussed
could end up coming from the Lebanese military and he was relieved
to find it was to come from the Ministry of Education instead –
to the tune of 100,000 Lebanese pounds (about £12,500).

The weather was beautiful the morning Manougian stood staring at
his three-metre rocket, named Cedar 2, sitting on the launcher
on the top of Mount Sannine, surrounded by colleagues, students,
representatives of the Lebanese government and military, and the
country’s media. Even though the society’s single-stage rockets had
been a success, he wasn’t sure if this latest one would just explode
on the launcher. His heart was beating fast as he watched the device
shoot upwards. “It was a perfect launch,” he says, “and as the two
stages separated the students screamed. I screamed: ‘It worked.'”

With the name of the club now changed to the Lebanese Rocket Society,
Manougian and his team were given an abandoned army artillery range
at Dbayeh on the outskirts of Beirut, overlooking the Mediterranean.

Manougian was interviewed on radio and television and their antics
garnered front-page headlines.

One article said the two-stage Cedar launched its four-minute flight
on a 110km trajectory before splashing down in the Mediterranean.

“With the setting sun glistening on its redcoloured sides… the 350kg
rocket climbed slowly from the launch pad into the southwestern sky –
leaving a vapour trail across the Bay of Beirut.”

Inspired by news that the Soviet Union had sent the first human,
Yuri Gagarin into space, Manougian considered sending a mouse up
in one of his Cedars. “We even named him Mickey,” he says. “Then I
asked Josette to prepare a parachute so that we may bring the nose
cone and Mickey safely back to Earth. But being an animal lover,
Josette used all her persuasive talents to stop us from launching
him.” Mickey, Manougian says, remained safe in the Lebanese Rocket
Society lab. “And it was a good thing I listened to her,” he says,
“because the parachute didn’t deploy.”

By now the team had begun designing its first three-stage rocket,
capable of reaching the thermosphere, which begins at around 50 miles
above the Earth’s surface. Cedar 3 was launched in November 1962 to
mark Lebanese Independence Day.The following year postage stamps were
issued to mark the launch of Cedar 4, something Manougian describes as
“perhaps the most telling of expressions of pride in the project”. In
early 1964, while Manougian was on a sabbatical from Haigazian,
studying for a Master’s degree in Texas, one of his students
experimented with some dangerous chemicals which exploded and set
fire to the physics lab. The student lost an eye, received thirddegree
burns and permanent damage to one of his arms. On returning to Beirut,
Manougian was devastated and considered ending the project. Instead,
he moved the entire operation to the army workshop for safety.

Manougian says that during the years that the rocket society was
active, a sign on his office wall read: “Chemicals may be used to
poison people, or they may be used to cure the sick; atomic power
may be used to annihilate nations, or it may be used to generate
electricity; rockets may be used to cause death and destruction,
or they may be used to explore the universe”. That said, for the
last couple of years he had noticed that his work was being closely
monitored by “people from the Soviet Union, the CIA and Mossad.

“They called themselves cultural attaches,” he says. “I met with the
head of the CIA several times and made it clear to him what I was
doing so he understood there was no military operation going on. He’d
ask me questions about the propellent.” Manougian says his work was
an open book. “There were no secrets and I was eager to demonstrate
the peaceful and scientific nature in the uses of rocketry.” One time
he deliberately placed a paperweight on top of some papers on his desk
and when he returned they had been messed up. “Next time I left a note
on my desk in large letters saying my filing cabinet was open and my
papers were available to look at, but please do not mess up my desk.”

Years later, he says Wehbe confessed that the Lebanese military was
never interested in seeing fireworks. “He was very frank,” Manougian
says. “He said their interest was to see whether they could convert
it into something the military could use and he apologised for not
telling me that when we were working together.

“From 1964 until 1966 we were launching fairly sophisticated rockets –
far superior to the ones Hizbollah uses now. What they use are so
primitive. They have no directional capability. And ours reached
further than theirs can.”

After Manougian returned to Texas the country’s interest in rockets
continued and in 1967 Lebanon launched Cedar 10. But, in the wake of
the Six DayWar, the West was no longer prepared to tolerate such a
programme and the government was told to halt all rocket activities.

Hadjithomas and fellow Lebanese film-maker Khalil Joreige stumbled
uponManougian’s story in 2000. “Today, we’re much more aware of what
can happen militarily,” Hadjithomas tells me from her home in Paris.

“But in the Sixties,Manoug and his students couldn’t see that, little
by little, the army was taking advantage. When we were making the
film we had a lot of discussions about that. He was really upset by
it. It was a betrayal in a way.”

Hadjithomas and Joreige also discovered that, although the rocket
society’s achievements were huge, very few people they spoke to who
had lived through the period remembered the Cedar rockets at all. “So
the film became our journey to discover why nobody remembered it,”
Hadjithomas says.The film-makers found that even the memories of the
generation old enough to recall the rockets taking off from those
mountains on the outskirts of Beirut had become clouded by decades
of conflict.

At the end of the film, we see Hadjithomas and Joreige themselves
spearheading an effort to have a life-size replica of the Cedar 4
rocketmounted on a plinth and placed in the grounds of Haigazian
College (now Haigazian University) – a lasting monument to Manougian
and the extraordinary club he founded. “We wanted to continue the
gesture of the dreamers,” Joreige says. “To give physicality to this
memory; and to say that we are able to continue dreaming today.”

‘The Lebanese Rocket Society’ is released on October 18

Manougian wanted to send a mouse upin one of the rockets. But he was
stopped by his animallovingwife

‘Manoug and his students couldn’t see that the army was taking
advantage. It was a betrayal in a way’

Analyst: Russia Needs Aliyev’s Re-Election As Azerbaijan President

ANALYST: RUSSIA NEEDS ALIYEV’S RE-ELECTION AS AZERBAIJAN PRESIDENT

Interfax, Russia
Oct 7 2013

MOSCOW. Oct 7

Incumbent Ilham Aliyev’s anticipated victory in Azerbaijan’s
presidential election on Wednesday will be in the interests of Russia,
a senior Russian analyst said on Monday.

“Many experts agree that the incumbent president will win. In this
situation, it is preferable for Russia that Mr. Aliyev should stay
in power,” Vladimir Zharikhin, deputy director of the Commonwealth
of Independent States Institute, told Interfax.

In regards to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, none of the candidates’
victory would mean any progress toward settling it, Zharikhin argued.

“The situation is such that a deep-going compromise is indispensable
for a settlement, but such a compromise would be seen as a serous
surrender of ground, or even defeat, by a considerable part of the
population both in Azerbaijan and in Armenia,” Zharikhin said.

“Those who go for such a compromise would effectively burn their
ratings. At the moment I can’t see any political figure big enough to
be able to do this. For this reason, the situation would most likely
stagnate. On the other hand, the main thing is there won’t be a war,”
he said.

He argued that the fact that Russia, the United States and the European
Union hold similar positions on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is a
stabilizing factor.

“Unlike in many other conflicts, the positions of Russia, the EU
and the U.S. on the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
approximately coincide. There are no obvious contradictions there.

None of the global players has unequivocal support for either party
to the conflict,” he said.

as mk

Vice Speaker Of Armenian Parliament Responds To Statement Of Ambassa

VICE SPEAKER OF ARMENIAN PARLIAMENT RESPONDS TO STATEMENT OF AMBASSADOR TRAIAN HRISTEA

by Tatevik Shahunyan

ARMINFO
Tuesday, October 8, 14:12

Both official Yerevan and European Union are interested in further
close cooperation irrespective of the latest processes. The president
of Armenia reaffirmed this stance at the Parliament Assembly of the
Council of Europe along with high-ranking European officials. Remarks
came from Eduard Sharmazanov, Vice Speaker of the Armenian Parliament,
in response to ArmInfo’s question regarding the statement the Head of
the EU Delegation to Armenia, Ambassador Traian Hristea made in an
interview with ArmInfo. In particular, Ambassador Hristea said that
initialing only the political part of the Association Agreement with
Armenia at the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius is impossible.

“Time will show how closely will be cooperating Armenia and the EU
and whether that cooperation will be backed with the Association
Agreement or any other document. There is no doubt, however, that
active cooperation of Yerevan and Brussels will continue irrespective
of the ongoing processes. Armenia is determined to continue the
dialogue with Europe and the democratic reforms in line all the strict
European standards,” Sharmazanov said.

Speaking at PACE, President Serzh Sargsyan and Vice Speaker Eduard
Sharmazanov reaffirmed Armenia’s readiness to initial the Association
Agreement with the EU at the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius
in November without the economic component, namely, the DCFTA.

In response to ArmInfo’s request to comment on the given statement,
Head of the EU Delegation to Armenian, Ambassador Traian Hristea,
said that Association Agreement with Armenia is impossible if any of
its components is omitted.

Mr. Hristea recalled that European Commissioner Stefan Fule said in
the course of his latest visit to Armenia that the negotiations on
the Association Agreement covered some provisions, specifically, the
structure- and system-related components, the component on the Deep
and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), as well as a provision
on free movement of persons. Therefore, DCFTA cannot be mechanically
separated from the Association Agreement, he said.

Negotiations for the Association Agreement with Armenia faced a
deadlock after President Serzh Sargsyan declared that Armenia is
ready to access Russia-initiated Customs Union. European officials
say that the Customs Union regulations run contrary to the ones of
the Association Agreement, particularly, when it comes to economic
aspects, DCFTA. In response, President Sargsyan has declared at the
PACE lately that Yerevan is ready to initial the Association Agreement
with the EU already in November, at the EPP Summit in Vilnius if the
economic component (DCFTA) is omitted if it contradicts the Customs
Union regulations.

Get Out Of Jail Day: Armenia’s 9th Amnesty Of Prisoners To Begin Tod

GET OUT OF JAIL DAY: ARMENIA’S 9TH AMNESTY OF PRISONERS TO BEGIN TODAY

News | 08.10.13 | 16:37

Photolure

Margar Ohanyan

By Siranuysh Gevorgyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

By the end of the day Tuesday around 600 convicts will leave 12
penitentiaries of the country under the amnesty declared on the
occasion of the 22nd anniversary of Armenia’s independence. Former
chief of road police Margar Ohanyan, in prison since 2011 for major
misappropriation of petrol state allotted to the road police, is
among the ‘lucky’ ones.

The amnesty applies also to oppositional Armenian National Congress
activist Tigran Arakelyan, viewed by the opposition as a political
prisoner, sentenced to six years of imprisonment. As Arakelyan’s
and the other three ANC activists’ cases are under investigation at
the Criminal Court of Appeal, the amnesty decision will be read in
court when the verdict is brought in. Reserve army colonel Vladimir
Karapetyan, charged will major fraud, will also be released from
custody.

As justice minister’s assistant Nikolay Arustamyan told the press,
besides the 600 released convicts the amnesty applies to another
1,000 whose remaining terms will be reduced. The amnesty will also
apply to those sentenced to alternative punishment (fines, community
service/penal labor).

In the history of independent Armenia this is the 9th amnesty,
which, as compared to others, covers larger scope of articles of the
criminal code, however does not apply to life sentence, state treason,
usurpation of power, espionage, sabotage, crimes of sexual character,
drug dealing.

The amnesty will greatly relieve the overload at penitentiaries.

Arustamyan says those institutions are built to room up to 4,100
people, while there are currently 4,700 convicts. The overpopulation
issue has been raised repeatedly by local human rights activists and
the Ombudsman’s office.

In reference to the claims that the amnesty is now declared to solve
that very issue of overpopulation of prisons, Arustamyan says:
“Next year we will have a new Criminal Procedure Code and as a
result imprisonment as a punitive means will be practiced less,
which means the amount of convicts will decrease; instead our courts
will start practicing more alternative punishment. And, besides,
Armavir penitentiary will start functioning since January 2014 and
the overpopulation issue will get solved regardless.”

The new penitentiary is designed to room 1,200 convicts; however next
year it will be ready to receive only 400 people.

Apart from the overpopulation issue, Arustamyan says, the amnesty
is of economic help to the country, as the expenses for keeping
the convicts are reduced (the state allots 4,395 drams ($10.70) per
convict per day). Arustamyan assures the number of recurrent crimes
has not grown since last amnesty.

Arustamyan said that after a similar amnesty in 2011 there has been
5.8 percent recidivism “which, as compared to Europe, is a rather
small figure”.

http://armenianow.com/news/49034/armenia_amnesty_margar_ohanyan

Armenological Centers In The Diaspora As Institutional Intellectual

ARMENOLOGICAL CENTERS IN THE DIASPORA AS INSTITUTIONAL INTELLECTUAL RESOURCE

08.10.2013

Arestakes Simavoryan Head of the Center for Armenian Studies,
“Noravank” Foudnation Vahram Hovyan Expert, Center for Armenian
Studies, “Noravank” Foundation

The issue of revelation and consolidation of the national potential
is peculiar for the countries with Diaspora. In such countries,
the importance is also attached, besides domestic resources, to the
external resources, represented by the Diaspora communities. The
latter has great potential – human, economic, political (as a means
for lobby), etc. – for any country.

The issue of using the potential of the Diaspora should not be
considered as simply receiving one-sided help from abroad, which
is based on national affiliations, i.e. as a sincere aspiration to
help your motherland and compatriots. The cooperation with Diaspora
is efficient only when it is based on mutually beneficial actions
directed to the solution of nationwide goals. It is not a mere chance
that recently expert community’s interest in Diaspora studies has
grown in many countries.

Besides political, economic, cultural and other aspects, the
cooperation between the motherland and Diaspora is also crucial in the
aspect of academic and intellectual sphere in general because the role
of the intellectual potential in the success of the nations and states
can hardly be overestimated. This fact makes the issue of revelation,
consolidation, elaboration of ways of cooperation with the Diaspora
imperative for the Republic of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.

Some steps have already been taken in this direction. The all-Armenian
conferences in different fields (medicine, architecture, law, etc.)
organized by the Ministry of Diaspora of RA are remarkable. In this
context the All-Armenian Conference of Political Scientists and
International Relations Experts,organized by Ministry of Diaspora of
Armenia, YSU and “Noravank” Foundation in November 2012 is remarkable1.

Several research programmes directed to revealing of the national
intellectual potential have been carried out by the Ministry of
Diaspora and “Noravank” Foundation in recent years. These programmes
are “Armenians in Israel: Some Problems” (Yerevan, 2009)2, “Armenian
Community Information Resources in the Post-Soviet Countries”
(Yerevan, 2009)3, “The Identity Problems and Information Resources
of the Armenian Communities in the Post-Soviet Countries” (Yerevan,
2010)4, “The Issues of Self-Organization of the Armenian Communities
in the South Russia”(Yerevan, 2010)5, “Armenian Community in the USA”
(Yerevan, 2010)6, “Problems of the Armenian Communities in Eastern
Europe” (Yerevan, 2011)7.

Currently two research programmes are carried out: “Research and
Analytical Community in the Diaspora: Issues of Organization and
Prospects of Cooperation” and “Armenological Centers in the Diaspora:
Estimation of the Potential”.

The goal of the first programme is revelation and counting of the
specialists in humanities of the Armenian descent and elaboration of
the ways of cooperation with the research and analytical community
in Armenia. The second programme is directed to the revelation of
potential of the Armenian Diaspora in the sphere of the Armenology
and its most effective use.

Revelation and counting of the intellectual potential of the
intellectual organizations or institutions are especially important
because while solving system problems group work is more efficient
than the individual. Mostly the Armenian Studies (Armenology) Centers
undertake the mission of intellectual institutions in the Diaspora.

There are dozens of such centers (Zorian Institute8, Haigazian
University9, Mkhitarian Congregation in Venice, etc.). They all
together form the main Armenian intellectual potential in the sphere
of Armenology.

The Armenology centers in the Diaspora, being of common Armenological
thematic scope, differ in other characteristics. For example, according
to the type of activity they can be of academic-educational, research,
analytical and other character, or they can have different sources
of funding.

As for the thematic scope, it should be mentioned that Armenology is
a broad academic field and it has its own directions and braches.

Correspondingly, general Armenologcial orientation does not imply
uniformity in the thematic scope of the Armenology centers. Some
centers have political orientation; the others study ethnography,
Diaspora studies, etc.

Until today studies of separate Armenology centers were carried out.

But there has been no comprehensive study of the Armenology centers
directed to the revelation and estimation of their potential. It will
be of great significance in the aspect of putting their activity on
more efficient and purposeful track, elaborating ways of cooperation,
strengthening ties with academic circles in Armenia, etc.

The study of the Armenology centers in the Diaspora from the academic
point of view solves two key problems – theoretical and practical,
which in their turn are divided into sub-problems.

In the theoretical aspect the study of the Armenology centers is
of introductory character and is mostly reduced to revealing and
estimation of their potential. In this context setting and solution
of the following main problems are singled out:

Drawing a list of Armenology centers mainly by means on web search;
Formation of a database about the centers by means of gathering and
systematization of the information from the web and other sources
(media, books, bulletins); Analysis of gathered information by means of
comparison and matching and other methods; Elaboration of a distinct
methodology of estimation of the Armenology centers’ potential:
setting of estimation standards; Estimation of the potential of the
Armenology centers by means of the elaborated methodology.

In the practical aspect study of the Armenology centers in the Diaspora
implies the most effective use of the revealed and estimated potential
in the interests of the Republic of Armenia, NKR and Armeniancy.

Setting spheres, levels and goals of the core activity of the
Armenology centers in accordance with their potential; Elaboration
of ways of raising potential of the Armenology centers; Revelation
of common spheres of activity, goals and mechanisms.

Though the practical issue of raising effectiveness of the Diaspora’s
Armenology centers implies serious academic researches and detailed
analysis, today a number of observations, which can become a guideline
for further studies, can be made.

It is referred to the spheres of studies the Armenology centers. By
their character these studies can be divided into three types:
educational, agitation and applied.

Educational researches are mainly concentrated on the issues of
Armenian history, Armenian philology, culture, ethnography and other
academic fields.

Agitation researches are mainly carried out in the sphere of Genocide
studies. Their goal is to introduce the tragedy of the Armenian
Genocide to the Armeniancy and world community. In these researches,
besides Genocide studies, other problems of the “Hay Dat” (Armenian
question) are also considered.

The researches of applied character are called to impact practical
policy, contributing to the resolution of the nationwide problems in
the practical plane.

Though the educational and agitation researches do not directly
impact practical policy, nevertheless they are not deprived of applied
character. In case with the researches of educational character, their
applicability in the Diaspora is connected with the preservation and
development of the Armenian identity, national self-consciousness
and culture. The applied aspect of the agitation researches in the
sphere of international recognition of the Armenian Genocide as well
as “Hay Dat” problems solution is in formation of the favourable
public opinion.

Accepting the importance of the researches of educational and agitation
character dominating in the activity of the Armenology centers in
Diaspora, it should be mentioned that the applied studies, which are
underestimated today, are of no less importance.

We suppose that the applied studies should be concentrated on topical
problems which are faced today by the Armeniancy, Rep. of Aremenia
and NKR. The applied task of these researches may become elaboration
of the practical ways of solution of these problems in case of timely
revelation of the causes and circumstances of their appearance.

We find it necessary to concentrate our attention on the following
problems:

“Hay Dat”. In this sphere it is reasonable to concentrate the
researches on the elaboration of favorable political, legal and
other ways of solving of the issue of international recognition
and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide, reclamation of damage10,
compensation and other issues.

Raising the blockade of Armenia. Here it is reasonable to study the
issues of choosing effective strategy and tactics, adequate means
of struggle against the blockade of the Rep. of Armenia and NKR by
Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Settlement of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. This issue also covers wide
range of problems – from containment of militarist policy of Azerbaijan
to the legal recognition of NKR’s independence.

Programmes of development of the Rep. of Armenia and NKR11.

Social-economic, scientific and cultural, educational, demographic
development of two republics as well as their deep integration
are meant12. This sphere is of strategic importance because without
comprehensive development and integration the security of the Rep. of
Armenia and NKR will be seriously imperiled.

As for the first three points, the Armenology centers have wide
field of actions with the lobbyist organizations of the Diaspora
which did not receive the academic support of the Armenology centers
while struggling for the international recognition and condemnation
of the Armenian Genocide, raising the blockade of Armenia and
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement. Meanwhile, such a support can
considerably trigger the effectiveness of this struggle. As the result
of the activity of the lobbyist organizations and Armenology centers,
the latter can turn into a kind of “think tanks” of the Diaspora,
providing academic support to the lobbyist organizations’ activity.

As for the programmes of development of the Rep. of Armenia and NKR
this issue provides wide field for cooperation with the authorities,
political powers as well as academic and analytical organizations in
the Rep. of Armenia and NKR.

1 See:

2

3

4 Yerkrner.pdf

5 hamainqner.pdf

6

7

8

9

10 E.g. the issue of reclamation of the expropriated church property;
See for details: Hovyan V. Issue for Reclamation of the Church Property
in Turkey. Globus, 2013, #1 (34), pp. 37-43 (in Armenian)

11 While speaking about the issues of development of the Rep. of
Armenia and NKR we should also remember about Javakhq which should not
stand apart from other regions of Armenia (Lori, Kotayk, Gegharkunik,
etc.) in the world perception of the Armeniancy.

12 The final goal of any integration is the uniting of the Rep. of
Armenia and NKR in one state formation and programmes should be aimed
on it.

“Globus” analytical journal, #9, 2013

Return ________________________________ Another materials of author

TURKEY ON THE THRESHOLD OF 2015[11.07.2013] SCHOOLS OF THE
ARMENIAN CATHOLIC COMMUNITY IN ISTANBUL[06.06.2013] ACADEMIC
AND EXPERT POTENTIAL OF THE DIASPORA: ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT AND
ORGANIZATION[04.03.2013] THE GROUNDS OF INTER-CONFESSIONAL COOPERATION
IN THE DIASPORA[03.09.2012] CHRISTIANS IN TODAY’S TURKEY (Protestants
and Catholics) [24.05.2012] THE CLERICAL AND CHURCH ISSUES OF THE
ARMENIAN CATHOLIC COMMUNITY IN RUSSIA[22.12.2011] CATHOLIC ARMENIANS
IN POLAND[17.10.2011] FORECASTS ON TURKEY’S FUTURE[15.09.2011] ON
THE ISSUES OF THE CATHOLICS ARMENIAN[09.06.2011] ARMENIAN CATHOLIC
COMMUNITY IN RUSSIA[24.12.2010]

http://tert.am/am/news/2012/11/19/21-dari-martahraver-hamajoghov/
http://www.noravank.am/upload/pdf/3.book.pdf
http://www.noravank.am/upload/pdf/1.book.pdf
http://www.noravank.am/upload/pdf/Hetkhorhrdayin
http://www.noravank.am/upload/pdf/Haykakan
http://www.noravank.am/upload/pdf/USA_book.pdf
http://www.noravank.am/upload/book.pdf
http://www.zoryaninstitute.org/
http://www.haigazian.edu.lb/Default.aspx

Armenian Referees To Officiate The Wales Vs. F.Y.R. Macedonia World

ARMENIAN REFEREES TO OFFICIATE THE WALES VS. F.Y.R. MACEDONIA WORLD CUP QUALIFIER

18:06 08.10.2013

Armenian referees will officiate the World Cup 2014 qualifying match
between Wales and F.Y.R. Macedonia, which will take place on October
11, Press Service of the Football Federation of Armenia reports.

“The referee is Suren Baliyan, the assistant referees are Mesrop
Ghazaryan and Vanik Simonyan. The fourth official is George Vadachkoria
from Georgia.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/10/08/armenian-referees-to-officiate-the-wales-vs-f-y-r-macedonia-world-cup-qualifier/

The Price Of Gas In Armenia Will Be The Same As In Russia

THE PRICE OF GAS IN ARMENIA WILL BE THE SAME AS IN RUSSIA

17:55 08.10.2013

Lusine Vasilyan
Public Radio of Armenia

Armenia’s decision to join the Caroms Union has led to changes in
the provisions of the interstate agreement on subsidization of the
gas price, Armenian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen
Movsisyan declared at the National Assembly today.

In particular, it is expected that Russia will refuse from the export
duties, which make about 30% of the gas price. This means that the
price of gas for Armenia will be the same as in Russia plus the
transportation costs. Therefore, the price will make $189 at the
border instead of the current $270.

According to Movsisyan, the price for customers will remain the same.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/10/08/the-price-of-gas-in-armenia-will-be-the-same-as-in-russia/

No United Opposition In Armenia – Zurabyan

NO UNITED OPPOSITION IN ARMENIA – ZURABYAN

17:05 08/10/2013 ” POLITICS

There is no united opposition in Armenia, which is one of the reasons
of holding a founding convention of the Armenian National Movement
party on October 26 and reviving that political force, Ararat Zurabyan,
member of the Armenian National Movement party’s initiative group,
told reporters in Yerevan, adding that they are planning to fill the
gap in the opposition.

Armenia will go to ruin unless the Armenian opposition changes,
he added.

Referring to the revival of the Armenian National Movement, Zurabyan
said, “I don’t think that ANC and ANM should be rivals because in
fact there is nothing to compete in. Although we have disagreements
on a number of issues, we also have common views on a range of other
questions.”

Source: Panorama.am