Iranian, Armenian FMs Discuss Mutual Cooperation, Regional Developme

IRANIAN, ARMENIAN FMS DISCUSS MUTUAL COOPERATION, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

Fars News Agency, Iran
May 5 2014

TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and his
Armenian counterpart Eduard Nalbandian in a meeting in Tehran on
Monday discussed bilateral ties and the latest regional developments.

During the meeting in the Iranian capital today, the Iranian foreign
minister pointed to the friendly and firm relations between the two
countries, and said, “The two states have close stances on important
regional and international issues.”

He underlined the need for the further expansion of relations between
Tehran and Yerevan, and said, “Taking into account the existing
potentials, Iran and Armenia should enhance their relations in
transportation, energy and banking sectors.”

Zarif also called for the resumption of the operation of Iran-Armenia
Joint Economic Cooperation Commission, and said, “The two countries
should continue meetings of their Joint Economic Commission.”

The Armenian foreign minister, for his part, pointed to the age-old
Iran-Armenia relations, and said, “My country is willing to cooperate
with Iran in different areas and I hope that mutual cooperation will
further expand in view of the positive atmosphere of today’s talks.”

The Armenian foreign minister invited Zarif to pay an official visit
to Yerevan in the near future.

Nalbandian also pointed to the ongoing talks between Iran and the Group
5+1 (the five permanent UN Security Council member plus Germany),
and said, “I hope that these talks will lead to positive results as
a result of the efforts made by both sides.”

Nalbandian arrived in Tehran at the head of a high-ranking political
delegation on Monday to hold talks with senior Iranian authorities.

In recent years, Iran and its Northern neighbor Armenia have boosted
cooperation, signed agreements on energy cooperation and agreed to
cooperate in technology and research and enhance ties in commerce
and economy.

http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13930215001427

Sumgayit Becomes Font Of Syria-Bound Jihadists

AZERBAIJAN: SUMGAYIT BECOMES FONT OF SYRIA-BOUND JIHADISTS

EurasiaNet.org
May 5 2014

May 5, 2014 – 1:26pm, by Shahin Abbasov

Known for its Soviet-era chemical and glass factories, now mostly
defunct, Sumgayit has become the center for Azerbaijani citizens
volunteering to fight in Syria. Various media reports put the number
of Azerbaijani fighters there at 200 to 400, with more than 100
killed. (Photo: Rena Effendi)

There are few outward signs to indicate the Azerbaijani city of
Sumgayit, a Soviet-era hub for the petro-chemical industry, is a
seedbed of Islamic militancy. Shops and restaurants sell alcohol,
and residents dress casually.

But, according to police, this smokestack city of 400,000, some
35 kilometers outside of the capital, Baku, is a major source of
Azerbaijani Muslims who go to fight, and often die, in Syria’s
civil war.

Thirty-six-year-old Sumgayit resident Rasul (last name withheld at
his request), knows firsthand the reality of Sumgayit’s reputation. In
2013, his younger brother, Zaur, then 32, was killed along with five
other people during a Syrian army attack on rebels near Aleppo. News
of Zaur’s death reached Rasul via an Azerbaijani TV report, which
showed his ID card and identified him as the commander of a group of
international mercenaries.

Still struggling to make sense of it all, Rasul termed Zaur’s actions
“wrong.”

“Zaur worked in a state-owned electricity company in Sumgayit,
never had problems with the police,” he said, sitting in his poorly
furnished apartment in a Sumgayit high-rise. “I would never suspect
that he had joined any radical religious group.”

His brother, Rasul said, began observing the Islamic prayer ritual in
2009. In late 2012, he disappeared. “He took some personal belongings
and left. Even his wife did not know where he was. We asked for the
police to help, but, after some time, he called me and asked not to
worry and said that he is working in Turkey,” Rasul recounted.

These days, along with his own two children, Rasul, who runs a small
retail business, looks after the three sons of his slain brother.

He told EurasiaNet.org that he has experienced problems with
Azerbaijani authorities because of his brother’s actions in Syria,
but declined to elaborate. No precise data exists for the number of
Azerbaijanis who have fought, or are still fighting in Syria, most
often with Islamic rebels against forces loyal to President Bashar
al-Assad. Citing secondhand sources, local media claim the number of
militants in Syria is anywhere from 200 to 400, with more than 100
killed in action.

With more frequent press coverage of Azerbaijani citizens allegedly
participating in the Syrian conflict, police are now paying closer
attention to this trend. In the past five years, “about 40” Sumgayit
residents have left Azerbaijan for Syria and Afghanistan, and almost
half of them have been killed, according to a survey of Azerbaijani
police departments by the local news agency Vesti.az.

Another 230 city residents are “under police control,” or being
watched, as potential mercenaries. Out of 40 police departments queried
by Vesti.az across the country, Sumgayit’s numbers were the highest,
in terms of the militant ratio to the general population. The sources
for the police information were not specified.

Sumgayit recently has emerged as a center for Salafism, a form of Sunni
Islam that advocates a return to Islam’s earliest practices. In late
2013, an armed clash between alleged Salafis and a group of Salafi
dissidents called Kharidjis left four people wounded and 16 detained.

Arif Yunusov, a Baku-based author of several books on the role of
Islam in Azerbaijan disputes the claim that Sumgayit sends the most
Islamic radicals to fight in Syria. Individuals “from various cities
and regions” in Azerbaijan make up the roster, he commented in a late
April interview done shortly before he was detained by authorities
and hospitalized because of a heart condition.

Towns in northern Azerbaijan near the border with Russia’s Dagestan,
a region long troubled by Islamic militancy, also are a frequent
source of Syria-bound jihadists, according to police information
given to the Azerbaijani news site Vesti.az.

What makes Sumgayit stand out is its community of Kharidjis, who,
contrary to other Azerbaijani Salafis, “believe that they should
not obey secular rules and must participate in jihad worldwide,”
according to Yunusov. Kharidjis recruit candidates via local mosques
and teahouses.

The city’s demographics play a role, too, he continued.

Built in the late 1940s, Sumgayit long ranked as a city of migrant,
relatively uneducated blue-collar workers. It did not have a mosque
until after the collapse of the Soviet Union. But at that point, other
upheavals came into play – the closure of many of the city’s industrial
plants and, amid the war with Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh
territory, Sumgayit’s transformation into a high-tension hub for
refugees and Internally Displaced Persons.

“All these factors created a kind of vacuum which was successfully
used by religious radicals,” Yunusov said.

Meanwhile, not only men, but also women from Sumgayit are being
encouraged to go to Syria, locals and media report. In April,
anonymous leaflets appeared throughout the city urging females to
conduct “marriage jihad” (jihad al nikah) – provide sexual services
to mujahidin — for entrance into heaven.

Police since have collected the leaflets, which were dismissed by
one Baku-based Salafi imam as “a provocation against those fighting
in Syria.”

Other than heightened police surveillance, official measures to stop
the outflow of would-be jihadists seem limited to stiffer penalties for
fighting as a mercenary. In March, prison terms for such activities
were nearly doubled to five to 11 years, while those who recruit or
sponsor mercenaries face a nine to 15-year jail sentence.

The punishments have had one effect – making those who have waged
jihad in Syria keep a low profile. Rumors circulate in Sumgayit about
supposed “mujahidin” who have returned home after fighting in Syria,
but none could be identified and asked to comment on their experiences.

Editor’s note: Shahin Abbasov is a freelance correspondent based
in Baku.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/68341

What Shared Interests Might Putin and Obama Have?

What Shared Interests Might Putin and Obama Have?

Igor Muradyan, Political Analyst
Comments – Monday, 28 April 2014, 13:00

George Friedman, the head of Stratfor in Texas which was established
in 1996 and aspires to the role of a global intelligence center is a
great imaginer but also a shrewd analyst. He has published an article
on developments expected in neighbor countries of Russia and Eastern
Europe (From Estonia to Azerbaijan: American Strategy After Ukraine,
by George Friedman Tuesday, 25 March
2014).[]

The author observes the prospects of geopolitical blockade of Russia
as NATO member states cut military expenditure and the alliance faces
certain disagreement when it is necessary to revise the role of some
states which surround Russia to contain the latter’s expansion.

These thoughts do not seem to be new but the article is interesting in
the context of Obama’s policy and Ukraine developments. We will not
retell the content of the article because it is available to readers
and we would like to share our point of view on this prospect.

During Obama’s presidency the United States has revised its policy on
Russia twice. The ex-U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul’s
concept was aimed at moderate containment of Russian foreign political
aspirations that did not suffer much from Secretary Condoleezza Rice’s
concept worked out during Bush administration on ignoring Russia,
viewing Russia as a secondary state and a secondary issue.

It’s been 14 years Russia has been confronting different expressions
of this concept. NATO is not ready and willing to make similar efforts
to contain Russia in Eastern Europe and other regions, which would
require boosting military expenses. Currently the United States and
NATO do not have another medium-term approach except for building the
`blockade capacity’ of Poland, Ukraine, Romania, Turkey, Georgia and
Azerbaijan.

In addition, the current relationship between Turkey and Russia is
rather tense and far from the solution of pending issues. Hence, with
minimum foreign initiative, Turkey will volunteer to support the
policy of isolation of Russia. Turkey is more than ever interested in
this policy and, furthermore, it is forcing concessions from Russia in
the Black Sea and Caucasian region. Besides, Turkey’s involvement in
this policy increases its role and claims in the region and the in the
world.

Of the two sovereign states of the South Caucasus, Georgia and
Azerbaijan, the latter will have the greater value in the policy of
isolation of Russia and the bid is on Azerbaijan, which is the news
that occurred after the Eastern Partnership summit in Vilnius where
the Eastern Partnership project was thwarted, and Georgia alone is not
able to achieve its task.

Azerbaijan is not a suitable option for the West, and not a long time
ago it was listed among Central Asian states. However, the West now
sees no alternative in the South Caucasus as Azerbaijan’s style is
well known in the world. It will claim its `rights’ in return for
these services, especially when shattering the positions of Russia’s
vassals is concerned.

In the result of the failure of the Western Partnership Azerbaijan and
Turkey received an unexpected and expensive gift, and will accept it
readily.

NATO carries out versatile activities in the South Caucasus which are
divided according to two styles and content. The first is real
integration of sovereign states, the second involves irritating Russia
by sending delegations to its vassal states. In addition, now the
relationship between Russia and its vassals is considered not as
temporary or tactical but hostile, and the policy of isolation of
Russia and collapse of its economy is applied to its vassals as well.

Despite the crisis of the genre (it has, after all, existed for 18
years, people might be tired), Stratfor, nevertheless, is always ahead
of the developments, giving the analytical community a boost.
Apparently, the concept of isolation of Russia is acquiring a new
content.

Currently the issue of Russia, not Ukraine, serves as an important
direction and lever in the domestic scramble in the United States. The
Republicans will not miss the `Russian factor’. Putin understands that
Democrats need help in this stage and tries to use this opportunity.

Obama had a telephone conversation with Putin during his visit to
Saudi Arabia. Apparently, there are mutual interests. Putin seemed to
take interest in oil and gas prices and prevention of geopolitical and
economic isolation. Obama is interested in successful election of his
successor of the Democratic Party, as well as prevention of a
fundamental change of his foreign policy.

On whose side is George Friedman now?

– See more at:

http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/estonia-azerbaijan-american-strategy-after-ukraine
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32350#sthash.KONtCd8I.dpuf

Erdogan peut (beaucoup) mieux faire

Marianne, France
2 mai 2014

Erdogan peut (beaucoup) mieux faire

par Anne Dastakian

Malgré une étonnante déclaration sur le génocide arménien, le Premier
ministre turc continue d’occulter l’histoire.

Le feu brûle là où il tombe.» Citant ce proverbe turc un brin obscur
dans un long et alambiqué «message concernant les événements de 1915»
(en clair, le génocide des Arméniens), le Premier ministre turc, Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, a créé la surprise à la veille du 99e anniversaire du
génocide en livrant ses «condoléances aux petits-enfants» des
Arméniens. Un changement de ton apparemment radical concernant un
point d’histoire jusque-là taxé de «prétendu» par l’historiographie
officielle turque, qui minimise le nombre des victimes (500 000 au
lieu de 1,5 million), et la réalité du génocide, les Arméniens étant
représentés comme des «traîtres» et parfois même des agresseurs.

Cependant, une lecture attentive du texte prouve que, si le ton a
changé, le fond n’a guère varié. «On ne peut contester que les
dernières années de l’Empire ottoman aient été une période difficile,
entraînant des souffrances pour des millions de citoyens ottomans,
turcs, kurdes, arabes, arméniens et autres, quelle que soit leur
religion ou leur origine ethnique», écrit Erdogan. Avant d’estimer que
ceux qui réclament la vérité ne cherchent qu’à «exprimer des discours
et des allégations accusateurs, blessants, voire même parfois
provocateurs». Déplorant l’absence de «reconnaissance ou d’excuses»
dans ce texte, le chanteur franco-arménien Charles Aznavour y voit
«une simple volonté de se montrer comme un homme politique
prétendument ouvert». Une analyse partagée par la majorité des
Arméniens, à un an du centenaire du génocide.

CE QUE “MARIANNE” EN PENSE

Sans juger des pensées et arrière-pensées du Premier ministre turc, on
constate que ce dernier éprouve des difficultés à mettre en accord ses
discours et ses actes. A titre d’exemple, Ankara se garde bien
d’engager le dialogue avec l’Arménie, par exemple en réouvrant les
frontières avec ce pays voisin.

L’ Azerbaïdjan supporte la Turquie sur la question arménienne

PRESSE TURQUE
L’ Azerbaïdjan supporte la Turquie sur la question arménienne

Nazim Ibrahimov, le président du Comité d’Etat des Affaires de la
diaspora de l’Azerbaïdjan, a déclaré que son pays soutient la Turquie
sur la question arménienne.

Ses commentaires sont venus lundi quatre jours après que le Premier
ministre turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan ait présenté ses condoléances aux
Arméniens pour les « évènements » de 1915 dans un message sans
précédent qui a attiré l’attention du monde entier selon la presse
turque.

Se référant à un discours en faveur de la Turquie par le président
azéri Ilham Aliev, vendredi dernier, Ibrahimov a souligné que la
diaspora azérie à travers le monde a longtemps lutté contre les
revendications arméniennes et que son pays continuerait à défendre la
Turquie.

Le Président azéri Aliyev avait parlé dans la capitale tchèque de
Prague contre une plainte du président arménien que la Turquie ne peut
pas être une partie de l’Union européenne car elle a fermé sa
frontière avec son pays. Aliyev a déclaré lors d’une réunion du
Partenariat oriental de l’UE : « Le Premier ministre turc Recep Tayyip
Erdogan a proposé d’ouvrir les archives sur les événements de 1915, il
y a quelques années, mais l’Arménie n’a pas répondu positivement ».

« Erdogan a exprimé ses condoléances pour le peuple arménien qui a
perdu sa vie, mais encore une fois l’Arménie n’a pas donné une réponse
positive »avait-il ajouté.

dimanche 4 mai 2014,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Deux Arméniens blessés hier à Alep dont le père catholique Gomidas T

LE SORT DES ARMENIENS EN SYRIE
Deux Arméniens blessés hier à Alep dont le père catholique Gomidas Tataklian

Hier, samedi 3 mai, dans le quartier Azizié d’Alep (Syrie) où vivent
de nombreux Arméniens, suite à des tirs de roquettes, un curé
arménien, le père Gomidas Tataklian de l’Eglise catholique arménienne
fut blessé. Près de l’Université d’Etat à Alep d’autres tirs ont
blessé plus d’une trentaine d’étudiants en littérature et économie
dont une Arménienne, Naïri Krikorian. Le 1eret 2 mai, quatre autres
Arméniens étaient blessé Ã Alep par des tirs de roquettes.

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 4 mai 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

Aucune "reconnaissance" ni "excuses" de la Turquie selon Aznavour

7 sur 7, France
25 avril 2014

Aucune “reconnaissance” ni “excuses” de la Turquie selon Aznavour

Le chanteur français d’origine arménienne Charles Aznavour estime que
le terme de “condoléances” utilisé par le Premier ministre turc dans
son message “aux petits-enfants des Arméniens tués en 1915” ne doit
pas être lu “comme une reconnaissance et encore moins comme une
présentation d’excuse”.

“L’humanisme qui doit présider aux relations entre les peuples et plus
largement entre les gens voudrait que cette déclaration soit un
premier pas vers un dialogue qui nous était refusé depuis cent ans”,
explique l’artiste dans un communiqué à l’AFP.

“Pour autant, la prudence amènerait à penser que cette expression de
condoléances est motivée par d’autres considérations que ce dialogue
tant voulu pour la vérité historique”, poursuit le communiqué. “Ne
reconnaissant toujours pas le génocide, il faut donc lire dans la
déclaration de M. Erdogan le terme de ‘condoléances’ non comme une
reconnaissance et encore moins comme une présentation d’excuses, mais
comme une simple volonté personnelle à vouloir se montrer un homme
politique prétendument ‘ouvert’, estime Charles Aznavour qui fêtera
ses 90 ans en mai.

Le Premier ministre turc, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a présenté mercredi
les condoléances de la Turquie “aux petits-enfants des Arméniens tués
en 1915”, à l’occasion du 99e anniversaire des massacres visant cette
communauté sous l’Empire ottoman.

http://www.7sur7.be/7s7/fr/1527/People/article/detail/1863008/2014/04/24/Aucune-reconnaissance-ni-excuses-de-la-Turquie-selon-Aznavour.dhtml

Génocide arménien: pour Devedjian, Erdogan a été "contraint" de fair

Agence France Presse
24 avril 2014 jeudi 8:38 AM GMT

Génocide arménien: pour Devedjian, Erdogan a été “contraint” de faire
ce “premier pas”

Paris 24 avr 2014

Patrick Devedjian, député UMP issu d’une famille arménienne, voit dans
les condoléances exprimées par le Premier ministre turc Recep Tayyip
Erdogan aux descendants des Arméniens tués en 1915 “un premier pas”
auquel l’a contraint l’opinion turque et mondiale.

Question: les propos de M. Erdogan vous semblent-ils un pas décisif
vers une reconnaissance du génocide pour laquelle vous militez ?

Réponse: “Ce sont des propos qui vont peut-être plus loin que lui-même
ne l’imagine. C’est un fait indéniable que c’est la première fois
depuis 99 ans que la Turquie présente des condoléances aux descendants
des victimes. Il s’agit donc d’un pas sur le chemin de la
reconnaissance. De plus, il a choisi le 24 avril, date anniversaire de
la grande rafle où toute l’élite arménienne de Turquie a été arrêtée
et ensuite assassinée. D’une certaine manière, il accorde à cette date
une reconnaissance qui entraîne celle du génocide. Il reconnaît le
drame. Il refuse de le qualifier, il essaye de noyer le poisson, mais
il choisit une date indissolublement liée au génocide”.

Q: comment expliquez-vous ce mouvement?

R: “Erdogan est inquiet des évolutions de l’opinion turque. On n’est
plus dans le temps où une chape de plomb pesait sur l’information de
ce pays. La mondialisation permet de s’informer. Les élites turques
sont aujourd’hui de plus en plus dans la reconnaissance du génocide, à
l’image de leur seul prix Nobel (de littérature, NDLR), Orhan Pamuk,
ou de l’historien Taner Akçam, auteur d’une contribution majeure sur
la planification du génocide. Quant au président Abdullah Gül, il est
plus audacieux qu’Erdogan dans le dialogue avec les Arméniens. Outre
ces considérations intérieures qui l’obligent à bouger, il y a les
Etats-Unis, tuteurs de la Turquie, très proches de la reconnaissance,
qui a été promise par (Barack) Obama et où s’amplifie un important
mouvement d’opinion. A un an du centenaire de l’événement, Ankara
risque d’être de plus en plus isolée. Erdogan a voulu déminer tout
cela et a donc été obligé à des concessions intellectuelles”.

Q: quelle doit être la prochaine étape, à vos yeux?

R: “Erdogan appelle à un dialogue entre les peuples turc et arménien.
Pour dialoguer, il faut se rencontrer. Qu’il ouvre la frontière !”.

Propos recueillis par Corinne DELPUECH

Comienza el centenario del Genocidio Armenio

Diario de Carlos Paz, Argentina
24 abril 2014

Comienza el centenario del Genocidio Armenio

¿Oculto y negado? Si, 100 años oculto y negado. ¿Por quién? Por la
República de Turquía, heredera jurídica del Imperio Otomano,
responsable de aquel, el primer genocidio del siglo XX, el siglo de
los genocidios.

Por Mariano Saravia

Hoy comienza el centenario del Genocidio Armenio. Es decir, desde hoy
comenzamos la cuenta regresiva hasta el 24 de abril de 2015, cuando se
conmemore el centenario de este genocidio aún hoy oculto y negado.

¿Oculto y negado? Si, 100 años oculto y negado. ¿Por quién? Por la
República de Turquía, heredera jurídica del Imperio Otomano,
responsable de aquel, el primer genocidio del siglo XX, el siglo de
los genocidios.

Ese 24 de abril de 1915 el gobierno de los Jóvenes Turcos detuvo y
luego asesinó a los 600 principales intelectuales armenios, entre
profesionales, artistas, estudiantes y dirigentes comunitarios. Luego
siguieron los hombres que fueron reclutados y ejecutados. Y por
último, las mujeres, ancianos y niños, trasladados por la fuerza en
deportaciones masivas hacia la muerte del desierto.

En total, un millón y medio de armenios exterminados entre 1915 y
1923. ¡Un millón y medio de personas! Lo mismo que la actual población
de la ciudad de Córdoba, para que usted se dé una idea.

Y después, la impunidad total. Una impunidad que está cumpliendo 100
años. Ni memoria, ni verdad, ni justicia, a pesar de la lucha
inquebrantable del pueblo armenio, en la Madre Patria y en la
diáspora, esparcida por toda la tierra, pero concentrada
principalmente en Rusia, Siria, El Líbano, Grecia, Irán, Gran Bretaña,
Francia, Estados Unidos y Argentina.

Si, Argentina, y también Córdoba. En Buenos Aires viven unos 100.000
descendientes de armenios, principalmente en los barrios de Palermo y
Valentín Alsina (Lanús). Y en Córdoba unos 10.000, sobre todo en
Barrio Pueyrredón, alrededor de esa columna vertebral que es la
Avenida Patria.

Por eso, no le extrañe a usted ver hoy marchar al mediodía desde Patio
Olmos hasta la Plaza San Martín de la ciudad de Córdoba a centenas de
jóvenes, adultos, hombres y mujeres, con banderas rojas, azules y
naranjas o con carteles que digan “Turquía, Estado genocida”.

Una impunidad de 100 años. Una impunidad criminal no sólo por el
genocidio que niega sino por los genocidios que propicia. Porque el
negacionismo tiene siempre esa doble perversión. De hecho, todavía se
recuerda aquel famoso discurso de Adolf Hitler del 28 de agosto de
1939 en el que preguntó muy suelto de cuerpo a sus oficiales: “¿Quién
recuerda hoy la masacre de los armenios?”.

Pero esa impunidad de 100 años no es sólo de Turquía, sino también del
resto del mundo que prefirió y sigue prefiriendo mirar para otro lado.
De hecho, sólo una veintena de países reconocen al día de hoy el
Genocidio Armenio. Entre ellos, la Argentina, desde 2007, por una ley
del Congreso promulgada por el ex presidente Néstor Kirchner. Y
también por un fallo de la Justicia Federal. Es decir, los tres
poderes del Estado.

Pero se dan situaciones extremas como que el Estado de Israel no
reconozca este genocidio, antecedente directo de la Shoá. Ni tampoco
lo reconoce Estados Unidos, a pesar de que todos los presidentes,
cuando fueron antes candidatos, prometieron hacerlo.

La impunidad se alimenta de la indiferencia y alimenta a su vez
futuros genocidios. Todos son políticamente correctos y ante estos
temas repiten algún comentario de ocasión, como “qué barbaridad” o
“son monstruos inhumanos”. Pero eso no es más que un pensamiento
mágico que tranquiliza conciencias y que da lugar a lo que llamo “un
Nunca Más bobo”, porque se repite lo de “Nunca Más” pero sin hacer
nada para que sea una realidad.

Si realmente queremos un verdadero Nunca Más, debemos empezar por
conocer lo más cruel de la condición humana, aunque nos duela, y
seguir por comprender lo inexplicable. Recién así podremos
comprometernos contra todo tipo de genocidios, de negación del otro,
empezando por comprometernos contra la impunidad, como esta que cumple
100 años.

Pero si usted llegó hasta aquí leyendo este artículo, ya es un buen
punto a favor de la humanidad, porque desde hoy ya usted no puede
seguir siendo indiferente, ni al Genocidio Armenio ni a ningún otro
genocidio, la aberración humana.

http://www.eldiariodecarlospaz.com/sociedad/2014/4/24/comienza-centenario-genocidio-armenio-583.html

Fuori dai soliti giri, la Cattedrale di Echmiadzin, il cuore della C

Travelblog.it , Italia
30 aprile 2014

Fuori dai soliti giri, la Cattedrale di Echmiadzin, il cuore della Chiesa Armena

Scritto da: debora – mercoledì 30 aprile 2014

La Cattedrale di Echmiadzin, la chiesa più antica e il cuore della
Chiesa apostolica Armena, patrimonio dell’Umanità.

Se lo chiedete a loro, l’Armenia è Europa. Usciti dal governo
comunista dell’URSS, gli Armeni non perdono occasione per rivendicare
la loro appartenenza all’Europa. E almeno dal punto di vista
culturale, hanno più di una ragione dalla loro parte (e se la montagna
più alta d’Europa fosse l’Elbrus?).

Iniziando dalla Storia e dalla Religione, visto che la prima nazione
ad aver abbracciato il Cristianesimo come religione di Stato, è stata
quella armena nel 301, 79 anni prima che fosse adottata come religione
di Stato dall’Impero romano.

Centro religioso di questo antichissimo Stato è Echmiadzin, ad appena
20 chilometri dalla capitale Yerevan, la città più sacra del paese,
sede del Catholicos, il capo della Chiesa armena, che risiede nella
Cattedrale.

Non solo la chiesa più importante, ma anche la più antica, visto che
fu terminata di costruire nel 303. Qui si conservano reliquie sacre
per i Cristiani, frammenti di legno dell’Arca di Noè e la lancia di
Longino, quella che trafisse Cristo nel costato.

All’interno affreschi aggiunti in epoca recente (nel XVIII secolo),
come è un’aggiunta anche la torre campanaria. Di interesse
architettonico, i 3 ingressi, mentre di interesse storico –
archeologico, l’altare costruito sopra un pre esistente luogo di culto
pagano. Dal 2000 la Cattedrale è parte del Patrimonio dell’Umanità
protetto dall’UNESCO.

La porta d’accesso al paese, dove si entra con il passaporto, è
Yerevan. In questo momento la situazione interna è tranquilla, anche
se sono da evitare le zone di confine con l’Azerbajan. Controllate
comunque sempre il sito del MAE Viaggiare Sicuri.

Da vedere in Armenia il tempio di Garni, uno splendido tempio greco, e
il sito archeologico di Zvartnots, dove si trovano i resti della
Cattedrale di San Gregorio.

http://www.travelblog.it/post/127593/fuori-dai-soliti-giri-la-cattedrale-di-echmiadzin-il-cuore-della-chiesa-armena