U.S. Embassy Strongly Condemns Destruction Of Armenian Church In Syr

U.S. EMBASSY STRONGLY CONDEMNS DESTRUCTION OF ARMENIAN CHURCH IN SYRIA

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

10:51 24/09/2014 >> SOCIETY

The U.S. Embassy in Armenia has issued the following statement on
the destruction of the Armenian Church in Syria.

“U.S. Embassy Yerevan joins the government and people of Armenia
in strongly condemning the destruction of the Armenian Church in Deir
Ez-zor, Syria.

This senseless act of destruction demonstrates yet again the utter
disregard the terrorist organization ISIL has for the rich religious
and cultural heritage of the Middle East.

As Secretary Kerry has stated, ISIL has systematically committed
abuses of human rights and international law and presents a global
terrorist threat. Faced with this threat, the United States urges the
international community to strengthen our united effort to degrade
and destroy ISIL.”

Related: Armenian MFA strongly condemns terrorists’ destruction
of Armenian Genocide Memorial Church

Vigen Sargsyan: Turkey must condemn terrorist act against Holy Martyrs
Armenian Church

http://www.panorama.am/en/society/2014/09/24/usa-embassy/

Armenia’s Independence Celebrated In Canada

ARMENIA’S INDEPENDENCE CELEBRATED IN CANADA

10:00 * 23.09.14

The Armenian Embassy to Canada on Monday hosted a reception dedicated
to the 23rd anniversary of Armenia’s independence, the Foreign Ministry
says in a statement on Facebook.

The ceremony was attended by Canadian Minister of Labor and Social
Development Jason Kenny, Chairperson of the Canada-Armenia Friendship
Group Harold Albrecht, members of the Canadian parliament, diplomats,
NGO representatives, journalists and local Armenians.

In his speech at the meeting, Armenian Ambassador to Canada Armen
Yeganyan addressed the recent developments in the bilateral relations,
focusing particularly on the mutual visits and the efforts towards
strengthening of economic ties.

Further speeches were delivered by Mr Kenny, who shared impressions
of his visit to Armenia, and Mr Albrecht, who dwelled on the bilateral
relations agenda.

Events dedicated to Armenia’s independence anniversary were also held
in the cities of Montreal and Toronto.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Modi Warms Up To Xi Keeping ‘Border’ As The Key Word

MODI WARMS UP TO XI KEEPING ‘BORDER’ AS THE KEY WORD

Jhinuk Chowdhury is a former journalist based in India and is
currently working as an independent writer. Jhinuk can be reached
at [email protected]

Published time: September 22, 2014 19:28

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) looks on as Indian Prime Minister
Narendra Modi speaks as they issue a joint statement in New Delhi on
September 18, 2014. (AFP Photo / Raveendran)

While economics and pragmatic foreign policy are the triggers, results
of the meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Prime Minster
Narendra Modi in India, are decided elsewhere – at the disputed
Sino-Indian border.

Just around the time of President Xi’s visit to India, the India
-China border hit headlines with reports of battalions of the Indian
Army being rushed to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) – that separates
both countries – following an incursion by Chinese troops into Indian
territory.

What followed later is a series of talks around business, security
cooperation and new Chinese projects, most of which PM Modi seemed
to have made conditional on the border situation.

Though trade continues, bilateral relations between the two countries
haven’t been too affable since the Sino-Indian border war in 1962,
mostly prompted by frequent border violations. However, lately China
has been showing a lot of interest in deepening ties with India.

What prompted this new change is the transformed geo-political
situation in which China is actually repositioning the importance of
India in the region.

An all-powerful China and the US with its Asia rebalance policy has
fragmented the region into two blocs – one around the dragon kingdom
and the other around the US and its allies comprising Japan, South
Korea and the Philippines. As each of the leagues strives to brace
up its network in the region, an economically emerging India with a
politically strong democratic system is seen by many as a game changer,
evident in the recent gestures from powers like Japan, locked in a
tiff in the East China Sea, courting India with an investment of up to
$35 billion. PM Modi is also lined up for a trip to the US this month.

Development partners?

China, which seems to be watching it all very closely, is
re-strategizing its response to US’s rebalancing by slowly pivoting
away from fiercely competitive East Asia where the Sino-American
relations have gone a little too combative. China feels the US’s
discomfort about China’s rise is at the heart of its rebalancing
policy. At a more intensive level China fears the US may even resort to
further strengthening defense ties in East Asia which could result in
military confrontation. This will certainly impact the Asian major’s
vision of an integrated East Asian economic zone apart from firming
US’s Trans Pacific Partnership cause.

The safer zone though is at the west of its border comprising South
Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East, where the U.S. is receding.

With the impending withdrawal of NATO forces from Afghanistan, China
feels Washington is leaving behind a vast void for it to fill. And
all along its ‘westward march’ in South Asia there is one key player
China knows it will always need – India.

India is also a vital component of President Xi’s pet project the
Maritime Silk Road (MSR) that connects the Indian and Pacific Oceans –
especially as it pitches forward the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar
(BCIM) Economic Corridor.

President Xi had set the tone of his three day visit in an op-ed on
the Indian daily The Hindu emphasizing the need for India and China
to become closer development partners who draw upon each other’s
strengths and work together for common development. It said, “The
combination of the world’s factory and the world’s back office will
produce the most competitive production base.”

He further indicated sustainable growth of the Asian economy will
be led by India’s participation in the BCIM Economic Corridor,
the initiatives of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century
Maritime Silk Road.

Tough Talks

However PM Modi, while showing his eagerness for all the offers China
has made, has also exhibited a certain kind of assertiveness.

Mentioning that China is significant for India’s foreign policy,
he also subtly made it clear that no business goal can be fully
materialized unless border issues are addressed.

Border protection was an important promise Modi made during his
election campaign when he openly criticized China for its ‘territorial
mindset’ making a reference to a reported Chinese incursion into Indian
Territory in 2013 just before the visit of Chinese Premier Li Keqiang.

Once in power, he immediately took up the task of bracing up the
infrastructure in the border regions like Arunachal Pradesh, which
China calls South Tibet.

In his press statement he said, “Peace and tranquility in the border
region constitutes an essential foundation for mutual trust and
confidence and for realizing the full potential of our relationship.

This is an important understanding, which should be strictly observed,”
emphasizing a speedy resumption of the stalled process of clarifying
the LAC.

Even the status of Xi’s BCIM project India hinted depends on the border
situation. As Modi stated, “We discussed regional connectivity and
the proposal for the Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar Economic
Corridor. Located at the crossroads of Asia, India believes that
reconnecting Asia is important for its collective prosperity.” But
he reiterated, “I also believe that our efforts to rebuild physical
connectivity in the region would also require a peaceful, stable and
cooperative environment.” Citing security reasons in the Indian Ocean
region, New Delhi stayed away from signing up for MSR revival.

As Harsh V. Pant, Professor of International Relations, King’s College
London explains, “The bottom line is as long as the border issue is not
given a serious consideration in Sino-Indian ties, this relationship
will be devoid of any real substance. The past approach of keeping
border issue on the side and concentrating on positive aspects like
the economy has clearly not worked.”

Quite explicably, as a stark departure from the past when the border
would find just a passing reference, this time around both India and
China released a statement terming resolution of border issue as a
“strategic goal.”

“Recalling the Agreement on the Political Parameters and Guiding
Principles for the Settlement of the Boundary Question signed in April
2005, both sides reiterated their commitment to an early settlement of
the boundary question and expressed their conviction that this will
advance basic interests of the two countries and shall, therefore,
be pursued as a strategic objective,” said a joint statement.

Stating “non-demarcation” as the main reason for the border violations
between the two countries, President Xi called for a resolution of
the boundary issue “at an early date.”

This assertive Indian approach is relatively new compared to the
past when New Delhi was always playing safe with China fearing a
border backlash.

However, while Modi has to take a tough stance on the border, when it
comes to delivering on the promises he made about India’s economic
growth the new prime minister needs strong partners who can execute
his development vision. As infrastructure and manufacturing are zeroed
in as the key sectors driving growth, China – which is already a huge
investor in Modi’s home state Gujarat – becomes the obvious choice
of a source for equipment and technology.

Though lower than Japan’s $35 billion which many expected China to
outdo, the promise of $20 billion is nevertheless quite a jump from
a mere $400 million that China has invested in India so far.

China is India’s largest trading partner with total bilateral trade at
$66.4 billion in 2013. However a huge trade gap exists between the two
currently at $35 billion favoring China which the latter committed to
address. The first step might be easing up Chinese market for India’s
pharmaceuticals, farming and fuel products. China will also help India
build high-speed rail projects. Apart from signing a MoU on space
cooperation, President Xi Jinping also mentioned the creation of the
“Asia-Pacific security and cooperation architecture that is open,
transparent, equal-footed and inclusive.”

But President Xi held back his agreement at one of the most contentious
issues for India -Beijing’s policy of issuing “stapled visas”
to passports from the disputed border region of Arunachal Pradesh,
which it calls “South Tibet”, stating they do not need permission to
travel to China!

So where is the “walk of the talk,” many ask. While in New Delhi,
President Xi is said to have ordered his troops to withdraw from India
after PM Modi raised the issue of the Chinese incursion. However,
the troops continued the intrusion even after the President left. The
impact is seen in the ongoing confidence building measures with
reports of calling off a soon to be held India-China media dialogue
with many suspecting the current standoff at the border being the
reason behind it.

Though it’s a relation of interdependence, quite obviously the
instability at the Sino-Indian border is casting a shadow of suspicion
over the broader and more progressive issues.

http://on.rt.com/bx4zjo
http://rt.com/op-edge/189688-india-china-border-talks-visit/

Wow! Turkey’s Erdogan To Meet Jewish, Armenian Leaders In NY!

WOW! TURKEY’S ERDOGAN TO MEET JEWISH, ARMENIAN LEADERS IN NY!

The Jewish Press
Sept 22 2014

Turkey’s President Erdogan is meeting with Jewish and Armenian leaders
in New York — but so what?

By: Rachel Levy

Roll out the red carpet! Make sure the horns are filled with lemon
juice. Get out the brass band. Are the spittoons all polished?

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has arrived in New York and
is set to meet with Jewish and Armenian leaders on the sidelines of
the United Nations General Assembly. The summit runs from Sept. 22
(today) through Oct. 1.

Erdogan is set to meet first with the Jews on September 23,
specifically with a delegation from the World Jewish Congress led by
Ronald S. Lauder, according to the Daily Sabah newspaper.

(He is also expected to meet with Archbishop Khajag Barsamian,
the primate of Diocese of Armenian Church of America (Eastern) and
president of the Fund for Armenian Relief, at a later unspecified
time. This is another “biggie” since Turkey has a running issue with
a 1915 accusation of genocide that has never been entirely resolved.)

The way the news of these meetings is being trumpeted about in Israeli
and Jewish media, one might think that something is actually going
to come of it. Sadly, nothing is likely to be further from the truth.

Erdogan’s previous vows to “protect the rights of the Jewish community
in Turkey” and his claims that the government will “never let the
Jewish people in Turkey get hurt” have been widely quoted by Turkish
media. But frankly, Harriet, some of the more jaded journalists
who have been around the corner a few times are a bit skeptical –
including me.

Israel’s recent counter terror Operation Protective Edge in Gaza,
launched to end incessant rocket fire aimed at Israeli civilians,
prompted an absolute flood of anti-Semitic rhetoric this summer from
the newly-elected Turkish president.

The verbal temper tantrum from a president who backs Hamas, which was
founded by the Muslim Brotherhood with which Erdogan is very close,
inspired in response a stream of vicious anti-Semitic op-eds. They were
written by columnists calling on the government to force Turkish Jews
to pay for Gaza reparations, and to punish Turkey’s Jewish community
for “Israeli war crimes.”

Erdogan did nothing to silence those voices, nor to protect the Israeli
embassy from the rioting mob that attacked its offices in Ankara this
summer. Police in Istanbul had more initiative and blocked off the
Israeli Consulate in their city; but little else was done. No public
statements were forthcoming denouncing the violence, or defending
the rights of the country’s Jews. A lukewarm statement was issued
days later mentioning that Turkish Jews are citizens of the country,
after all; and added it was best if they denounced Israel anyway.

But Turkish anti-Semitism is unfortunately not new. It was apparently
quite hale and hearty during the Ottoman Empire, as a columnist for
The Huffington Post pointed out this week.

There was the infamous Wealth Tax of 1942, and the Thrace pogrom which
started in June 1934 but unlike the Russian version, lasted a month.

It dragged on until it reached a peak on the night of July 3, when
Jewish homes in Kirklareli – near the Bulgarian border – were raided.

Most of the Jews who abandoned their homes in 1934 never went back.

More emigrated in 1948-49, upon the rebirth of the State of Israel.

Although there is little actual physical violence today against Jews
in Turkey, save for the sporadic crimes that plague any society,
the under-current of anti-Semitism is never far from the surface. It
is impossible to walk into any supermarket in Istanbul, for example,
and find any packaged item marked with reliable kosher supervision
on the label. It simply doesn’t exist.

Synagogues have become armored fortresses. At the Neve Shalom shul
in Istanbul, one is required to hand over a passport simply to enter
the building. There, the grim-faced Turkish security guard will check
you out and grudgingly let you through a metal detector, but he won’t
allow you to take your passport back until you exit the premises. And
don’t dawdle.

Don’t even think of trying to exchange Israeli shekels for Turkish
lira in the airport, if you were silly enough to pass through Tel
Aviv on your way to Istanbul or Ankara.

The sense of hostility is growing ever more palpable by the day. One
can feel it in the air; and the not-so-subtle government backing
received by anti-Semites this time around is making things even worse.

A survey conducted by Gonzo Insight found that nearly 31,000 (30,926)
tweets in Turkish on the Twitter social networking site were posted
in support of the Holocaust within 24 hours on July 17-18. That came
10 days after the start of Operation Protective Edge.

Families of Israeli diplomats and non-essential personnel were
recalled this summer due to the deteriorating security situation. A
kosher supervisor who normally stays in Turkey left the country –
and reported had “problems” in the airport on the way out. Other
Turkish Jews are quietly making contingency plans as well.

Oddly, Louis Fishman, an assistant professor at Brooklyn College
(CUNY), also received a number of threats. Fishman, who spent several
years in Turkey, was attacked in response to an article he wrote
for Ha’aretz by fellow academic Ali Ihsan Goker, a chair of physics
at Bilecik Seyh Edibali University. Goker tweeted — in English —
“Treblinka will be ready soon. Constructing the railway to transport
jews (sic) at the moment,” a blatant threat which under the Turkish
penal code is punishable by law.

Instead, Goker was recently awarded a research grant by the
government-funded Scientific and Technological Research Council of
Turkey, according to The Huffington Post.

In an op-ed penned for the Post, Umut Ozkirimli, professor of
Contemporary Turkey Studies at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies
(CMES) at Lund University, sums up the current danger faced by Turkish
Jews. He writes: “anti-semitist sentiments are much more mainstream and
legitimate than before, given the open backing of the representatives
of the ruling AKP, the lack of legal sanctions against hate speech
towards Jews (and other minorities) and the general atmosphere of
intolerance and polarization which breed these sentiments.”

As influential as the World Jewish Congress may be, it is likely that
anything its delegation may have to say will have about as much effect
on Turkey’s president as have any other past requests or admonitions
he has heard from Americans, starting with U.S. President Barack
Obama. (read: zero.)

Erdogan is also scheduled to meet with United Nations Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon, and will be interviewed by American journalist Charlie
Rose, in addition to his sit-downs with other world leaders.

Will any of them bother to ask Erdogan the tough questions?

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/wow-turkeys-erdogan-to-meet-jewish-armenian-leaders-in-ny/2014/09/22/

IS Said To Destroy Armenian Genocide Memorial

IS SAID TO DESTROY ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MEMORIAL

The Times of Israel
Sept 22 2014

Complex in Deir ez-Zor was often compared to the Auschwitz death camp
in Poland

By Times of Israel staff

ighters from the Islamic State reportedly desecrated an Armenian
Genocide memorial complex in the eastern Syrian city of Deir ez-Zor,
near the site where vast numbers of Armenian refugees were forced
to march to their deaths in the early 20th century, Lebanese media
outlet Al Mayadeen TV reported.

The Der Zor Memorial Church contains the remains of victims of the
Armenian Genocide and is often compared to the Auschwitz death camp
in Poland.

Hundreds of thousands of Armenians were said to have died during the
march to Deir ez-Zor, which was ordered by Ottoman Turk soldiers.

Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian condemned the destruction
of the church and called on the international community to combat
the Islamic State, which, he said, “threatened civilized mankind,”
Armenian news outlets reported.

The Armenian Genocide Memorial Church served as a pilgrimage site for
Armenians in Syria, and every year, on April 24, special commemoration
ceremonies attended by thousands of people would be held at the site.

The complex housed, in addition to the church, a museum, monument
and archive.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/is-reportedly-destroys-armenian-genocide-memorial/

Impossible to pay "senseless" salaries at Yerevan rubber plant

Impossible to pay “senseless” salaries at Yerevan rubber plant – minister

17:45, 19.09.2014

YEREVAN. – It is no longer possible to pay senseless salaries at
Nairit chemical rubber plant of Armenia’s capital city Yerevan, stated
Energy and Natural Resources Minister Yervand Zakharyan.

He recalled that the Nairit employees’ salaries are paid from the
proceeds of Armenia’s state-run energy companies: Yerevan Thermal
Power Plant, and Vorotan Hydro Cascade.

“But the plant employees’ complaints and their demands are completely
fair. Both the President and the PM are seriously concerned about the
situation,” the minister also announced.

In Zakharyan’s words, the respective working group will have to
prepare, in a short period of time, a package of recommendations on
the future of the plant.

The minister noted that 2,261 employees are registered at Nairit,
which includes 425 people from the management and 361 specialists.

The Nairit Plant CJSC has ceased production since April 2010. Three
years later, however, it was informed that Russian Rosneft company had
programs toward making investments in the plant.

Armenia News – NEWS.am

La 5ème conférence Arménie-Diaspora commence à Erevan

ARMENIE
La 5ème conférence Arménie-Diaspora commence à Erevan

La 5ème Conférence Arménie-Diaspora, organisée et accueillie par le
ministère arménien de la diaspora, a commencé vendredi à l’Opéra
d’Erevan.

Le Premier ministre arménien Hovik Abrahamian et le président de
l’Artsah Bako Sahakian ont fait les allocutions d’ouverture. Karékine
II, Catholicos de tous les Arméniens, Aram Ier, Catholicos de la
Grande Maison de Cilicie, et le patriarche catholique Nersès Petros
XIX ont également pris la parole lors de la cérémonie d’ouverture de
la conférence.

Dans son discours de bienvenue, le président Sahakian a noté que la
conférence est devenue une tradition et joue un rôle important dans
les relations entre l’Arménie et la diaspora et dans le secteur de la
coopération. Bako Sahakian a déclaré que l’Artsakh est prêt à renir
compte des remarques de la conférence de cette année et d’agir en
conséquence.

Le président a déclaré que la coopération entre l’Artsakh, l’Arménie
et la diaspora est essentielle à la vitalité de la nation arménienne
et la préservation de la culture arménienne.

Aram Ier, Catholicos de la Grande Maison de Cilicie, a fait remarquer
que la conférence, dédiée à la 100e anniversaire du génocide arménien,
doit être tenu en haute estime et devrait s’efforcer de faire entendre
la voix des Arméniens dans la communauté internationale.

Il a souligné que la question du génocide arménien doit être abordée
sur le plan juridique. “Notre objectif doit être non seulement être la
reconnaissance et la condamnation du génocide, mais aussi des
réparations pour ses conséquences. Notre vocabulaire devrait avoir les
termes >, > et >, a
déclaré Aram I. Il a souligné que la Turquie doit se rendre compte
qu’elle ne peut pas violer le droit d’une nation tout entière en toute
impunité.

Aram I croit que le centième anniversaire du génocide arménien devrait
marquer le début d’une nouvelle étape de la reconnaissance
internationale du génocide, ainsi que la reconnaissance et la
réparation par la Turquie.

Il a ajouté que l’Eglise arménienne prendra des mesures cohérentes en
matière de récupération des biens de l’Eglise arménienne en Turquie.
“Nous allons demander à des structures juridiques internationales,
mais aussi à l’Arménie, en tant qu’Etat, de nous soutenir”, a-t-il
dit.

Il a également exprimé sa préoccupation face à la destruction
progressive des communautés arméniennes en Syrie, en Irak et en
Ukraine, et a souligné la nécessité de fournir toute l’aide possible
pour les communautés arméniennes dans ces pays.

Aram Ier a également annoncé qu’il va demander à la Cour
constitutionnelle de Turquie d’exiger le retour du Catholicossat de
Sis à l’Eglise arménienne. Il a en outre déclaré qu’il est prêt à
solliciter la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme si la cour Turque
refusait la demande. Comme le Catholicos l’a souligné, la Turquie doit
toujours se rappeler que l’Arménie ne cessera jamais de lutter pour
ses droits face à tous les obstacles.

Le Catholicos a appelé tous les Arméniens à la lutte pour la
restitution des biens arméniens et pour la restauration des droits des
Arméniens, dans l’esprit de la jeunesse qui a osé élever la voix en
1965, réclamant justice et la restitution des terres arméniennes pour
la première fois.

“En 2015, pour le centenaire du génocide, leurs enfants et les jeunes
de la diaspora doivent unir leurs voix pour appeler à la justice”, a
déclaré le Catholicos.

Pour sa part, le Catholicos de tous les Arméniens Karékine II a
souligné l’importance du renforcement des relations
Arménie-diaspora-Artsakh pour atteindre des objectifs importants pour
les Arméniens à travers le monde et la reconnaissance du génocide
arménien en est un.

Hovik Abrahamyan le Premier ministre dans son allocution, a salué la
conférence et le rapprochement des Arméniens du monde entier pour
établir des plans de travail et de coopération.

Hovik Abrahamian cité Garegin Nzhdeh en disant :

A Marseille, appel à la mobilisation après la profanation de la stèl

Le Monde
A Marseille, appel à la mobilisation après la profanation de la stèle
du Groupe Manouchian

Par Gilles Rof –

La Jeunesse arménienne de France (JAF) a appelé à un rassemblement,
dimanche 21 septembre en fin d’après-midi, à Marseille, pour dénoncer
la > par les membres d’un groupuscule nationaliste
jusqu’alors inconnu.

Début septembre, une dizaine de personnes, visiblement jeunes et
portant pour la plupart un tee-shirt blanc à l’effigie du groupe
Mouvement populaire-Nouvelle Aurore, se sont réunis autour de la stèle
dédiée à Missak Manouchian et à son groupe de résistants, sur une
petite place située près du Vieux-Port à Marseille. Une vidéo postée
le 8 septembre sur le site YouTube les montre dans une mise en scène
chaotique, écoutant l’exposé balbutiant d’un maître de cérémonie, puis
déposant un drap blanc sur le buste du résistant communiste,
commandant du groupe FTP-Moi et exécuté, avec 22 de ses camarades, au
Mont-Valérien en février 1944.

Dans ce film de 6 minutes, volontairement flouté pour que les visages
ne soient pas identifiables, les participants à cette action
qualifient Missak Manouchian de

Armen Dzhigarkhanyan: "Victory Is When Two Conflicting People Agree,

ARMEN DZHIGARKHANYAN: “VICTORY IS WHEN TWO CONFLICTING PEOPLE AGREE, ASK, CONVINCE EACH OTHER”

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Sept 19 2014

19 September 2014 – 7:21pm

Interview by Oleg Kusov, exclusively to Vestnik Kavkaza Interesting
guests are always welcome at Vestnik Kavkaza. Oleg Kusov gives all
guests in the studio an opportunity to speak. These conversations are
not only about the Caucasus. A half-hour conversation over tea passes
quickly. The section “Take My Word” records conversations in video,
audio and text formats. The guest of Vestnik Kavkaza today is Armen
Dzhigarkhanyan.

– Armen Borisovich, we are now at your theatre. I should ask you as
a compatriot, do you have Caucasian plays in your theatre?

– Believe me, whoever I play, I always stay an Armenian. I can play
in Russian, French, English, but still I am an Armenian. This is my
genetics, whether I want it or not. I can pretend that I will play
a French Louis. This is not true! I will play an Armenian Louis.

Whether you glue noses or a beard on me, it doesn’t matter. This is
my essence, my genetics. Moreover, if I have to speak about a problem,
I will do it in an Armenian manner.

– At the moment your colleague, director Anatoly Dzivayev, is working
in Ossetia on a very interesting film project “Tili and Toli.”

It has an international, Ossetian-Georgian plot, when a state border
separates two old friends, and they don’t understand why it has
happened to them. I’m sure you are aware of the project.

– This is a good question.

– But there is a view that it is difficult to touch on such
complicated topics in cinema and theatre.

– No. There was a great Armenian poet, Ovanes Tumanyan, who was also
a great person. He would run anywhere where two people – sometimes two
Armenians or an Azerbaijani and an Armenian – fought, because there was
a lack of water in a canal – one of them spent all the water resources,
and th other is indignant. And he had to settle the conflict. The worst
thing is when people use force. We know that it is important to agree.

– But there are people who don’t want to agree and use force, and
it leads to an avalanche of problems.

– Yes. And Ovanes Tumanyan comes and says: “Folks, let’s do it
together: I will help you to stream the water here, and you will
help him. At first water runs to you, and then it runs to you.” So,
we count on smart people. And we can see it every day. We witness
the developments. The easiest and the worst option is war. Fighting
is the worst thing, and life confirms this. Nations died because of it.

– It doesn’t solve the problem, it only makes it more complicated.

– Bernard Shaw said a wonderful phrase: “You are able to talk.”

This should be used rather than beating each other and thinking this
is a victory. This is not true. Victory is the ability to agree,
to ask, to convince each other. Let’s do it in this way. The easiest
path is shooting at each other. And what’s next? It is a difficult
question. That’s why people have no common formula. We always meet
smart people who think about it and try to settle the task. My mother
said: “Take a pencil and write it down.” Of course. Unfortunately, we
have seen a lot of tragedies. I think it is a difficult question. This
is a domestic problem. We eat some food, they eat different food. At
first it was nice, but someday… Ovanes Tumanyan has a poem “A Drop
of Honey.” It is a great story. A man and his dog are on their way
home after hunting; they see a local resident: “Please pour a jar
of honey for me, so I can return home.” And when he pours him honey,
a drop falls on the floor. The cat of the resident jumps to lick the
drop, but the hunter’s dog attacks the cat. The resident takes a stone
and kills the dog. Of course the hunter was angry… And a war starts.

– Because of a drop of honey.

– Yes, of course. I’ve told you the story poorly, but it is
outstanding.

– You have told it outstandingly. Speaking about a Caucasian person,
do you think there is a common culture of the Caucasus, when people
understand each other from one sight?

– I should ask you a question. In what language will we talk to
each other? I am an Armenian, I speak Armenian. And I should talk to
an Azerbaijani.

– You can use the Russian language.

– Oh, you are too cunning.

– Presidents still use Russian to talk to each other.

– No, my dear, no. There is an interpreter. It is important. I
have good friends among interpreters; they say that one comma can
solve big problems. This is a difficult question; that’s why they
interpret ideas, essence, not words. I ask you: in what language do
the President of Russia and the President of Ukraine communicate?

– I think in Russian.

– But he is a Ukrainian. What if he doesn’t speak Russian?

– I wish they communicated in Russian, because we were born in
one country.

– I think there are details. I am an Armenian.

– I am an Ossetian.

– They always ask me: in what language do you think? I cannot say
for sure, but it seems to me I am thinking in Russian. We know that
there are many details. We have just spoken about interpreters.

There are many details and shades: louder, softer, to the left,
to the right. This is the core of diplomacy – to find a precise
definition. I think cunning people are building their policies on this.

– What to say and how to interpret it.

– Once I saw an interpreter translated something, but it turned out
the speaker spoke the language better than the interpreter and he
said: “You misinterpreted my words. I mean a different thing.” This
is a complicated world. So we make arguments to convince people and
agree with them. Yes, concessions are needed. Yes, we like cabob,
they like pilaf, but we can live in peace. And we must agree. I think
art is very important, in what language a story is narrated. I know
that the Armenians are Christians, the Azerbaijanis are Muslims. But
this is not a reason for fighting each other.

– This is a reason for rapprochement, understanding the common ways
of God.

– Certainly. But there are ignorant and “kind” people who use this…

– To provide their own interests.

– So, I think the main thing is that we should want to live, not die;
and in this case we will understand it. If my child, my grandchild
lives, I will think about supporting them. I think it is important.

– Are you’re a Soviet person mentally?

– What is a Soviet person?

– First of all, it is an internationalist.

– I don’t really understand. I don’t know. I can find an appropriate
word. If I am good in my heart, if I want to help people, I am an
internationalist, as you say, I can’t find a precise word. But if
I want to humiliate someone with this, it is bad. The main thing is
the ability to agree.

– That’s why God made people talk to each other.

– Precisely. They talk to agree with each other.

– And finally, what is the secret of your love for life? You are a
very active person who is always busy.

– I think the secret is love. I love my job. I love the people who
work with me and talk to me. I see many different things. I am an
old person and understand a lot in life. I am an experienced actor,
I have spent 60 years in the theatre. I was taught: you should try
something different. You play nice, but let’s try a different way. And
it will enable us to find many details. I like smart people so much.

Once a smart person said about one of the laws of jurisprudence:
there is too much evidence to consider them sufficient.

Interview by Oleg Kusov, exclusively to Vestnik Kavkaza

Interesting guests are always welcome at Vestnik Kavkaza. Oleg Kusov
gives all guests in the studio an opportunity to speak. These
conversations are not only about the Caucasus. A half-hour
conversation over tea passes quickly. The section “Take My Word”
records conversations in video, audio and text formats. The guest of
Vestnik Kavkaza today is Armen Dzhigarkhanyan.

– Armen Borisovich, we are now at your theatre. I should ask you as
a compatriot, do you have Caucasian plays in your theatre?

– Believe me, whoever I play, I always stay an Armenian. I can play
in Russian, French, English, but still I am an Armenian. This is my
genetics, whether I want it or not. I can pretend that I will play
a French Louis. This is not true! I will play an Armenian Louis.

Whether you glue noses or a beard on me, it doesn’t matter. This is
my essence, my genetics. Moreover, if I have to speak about a problem,
I will do it in an Armenian manner.

– At the moment your colleague, director Anatoly Dzivayev, is working
in Ossetia on a very interesting film project “Tili and Toli.”

It has an international, Ossetian-Georgian plot, when a state border
separates two old friends, and they don’t understand why it has
happened to them. I’m sure you are aware of the project.

– This is a good question.

– But there is a view that it is difficult to touch on such
complicated topics in cinema and theatre.

– No. There was a great Armenian poet, Ovanes Tumanyan, who was also
a great person. He would run anywhere where two people – sometimes two
Armenians or an Azerbaijani and an Armenian – fought, because there was
a lack of water in a canal – one of them spent all the water resources,
and th other is indignant. And he had to settle the conflict. The worst
thing is when people use force. We know that it is important to agree.

– But there are people who don’t want to agree and use force, and
it leads to an avalanche of problems.

– Yes. And Ovanes Tumanyan comes and says: “Folks, let’s do it
together: I will help you to stream the water here, and you will
help him. At first water runs to you, and then it runs to you.” So,
we count on smart people. And we can see it every day. We witness
the developments. The easiest and the worst option is war. Fighting
is the worst thing, and life confirms this. Nations died because of it.

– It doesn’t solve the problem, it only makes it more complicated.

– Bernard Shaw said a wonderful phrase: “You are able to talk.”

This should be used rather than beating each other and thinking this
is a victory. This is not true. Victory is the ability to agree,
to ask, to convince each other. Let’s do it in this way. The easiest
path is shooting at each other. And what’s next? It is a difficult
question. That’s why people have no common formula. We always meet
smart people who think about it and try to settle the task. My mother
said: “Take a pencil and write it down.” Of course. Unfortunately, we
have seen a lot of tragedies. I think it is a difficult question. This
is a domestic problem. We eat some food, they eat different food. At
first it was nice, but someday… Ovanes Tumanyan has a poem “A Drop
of Honey.” It is a great story. A man and his dog are on their way
home after hunting; they see a local resident: “Please pour a jar
of honey for me, so I can return home.” And when he pours him honey,
a drop falls on the floor. The cat of the resident jumps to lick the
drop, but the hunter’s dog attacks the cat. The resident takes a stone
and kills the dog. Of course the hunter was angry… And a war starts.

– Because of a drop of honey.

– Yes, of course. I’ve told you the story poorly, but it is
outstanding.

– You have told it outstandingly. Speaking about a Caucasian person,
do you think there is a common culture of the Caucasus, when people
understand each other from one sight?

– I should ask you a question. In what language will we talk to
each other? I am an Armenian, I speak Armenian. And I should talk to
an Azerbaijani.

– You can use the Russian language.

– Oh, you are too cunning.

– Presidents still use Russian to talk to each other.

– No, my dear, no. There is an interpreter. It is important. I
have good friends among interpreters; they say that one comma can
solve big problems. This is a difficult question; that’s why they
interpret ideas, essence, not words. I ask you: in what language do
the President of Russia and the President of Ukraine communicate?

– I think in Russian.

– But he is a Ukrainian. What if he doesn’t speak Russian?

– I wish they communicated in Russian, because we were born in
one country.

– I think there are details. I am an Armenian.

– I am an Ossetian.

– They always ask me: in what language do you think? I cannot say
for sure, but it seems to me I am thinking in Russian. We know that
there are many details. We have just spoken about interpreters.

There are many details and shades: louder, softer, to the left,
to the right. This is the core of diplomacy – to find a precise
definition. I think cunning people are building their policies on this.

– What to say and how to interpret it.

– Once I saw an interpreter translated something, but it turned out
the speaker spoke the language better than the interpreter and he
said: “You misinterpreted my words. I mean a different thing.” This
is a complicated world. So we make arguments to convince people and
agree with them. Yes, concessions are needed. Yes, we like cabob,
they like pilaf, but we can live in peace. And we must agree. I think
art is very important, in what language a story is narrated. I know
that the Armenians are Christians, the Azerbaijanis are Muslims. But
this is not a reason for fighting each other.

– This is a reason for rapprochement, understanding the common ways
of God.

– Certainly. But there are ignorant and “kind” people who use this…

– To provide their own interests.

– So, I think the main thing is that we should want to live, not die;
and in this case we will understand it. If my child, my grandchild
lives, I will think about supporting them. I think it is important.

– Are you’re a Soviet person mentally?

– What is a Soviet person?

– First of all, it is an internationalist.

– I don’t really understand. I don’t know. I can find an appropriate
word. If I am good in my heart, if I want to help people, I am an
internationalist, as you say, I can’t find a precise word. But if
I want to humiliate someone with this, it is bad. The main thing is
the ability to agree.

– That’s why God made people talk to each other.

– Precisely. They talk to agree with each other.

– And finally, what is the secret of your love for life? You are a
very active person who is always busy.

– I think the secret is love. I love my job. I love the people who
work with me and talk to me. I see many different things. I am an
old person and understand a lot in life. I am an experienced actor,
I have spent 60 years in the theatre. I was taught: you should try
something different. You play nice, but let’s try a different way. And
it will enable us to find many details. I like smart people so much.

Once a smart person said about one of the laws of jurisprudence:
there is too much evidence to consider them sufficient.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/interviews/society/60166.html

How Ex-Soviet Separatists Interpret Scotland’s Vote

HOW EX-SOVIET SEPARATISTS INTERPRET SCOTLAND’S VOTE

EurasiaNet.org
Sept 19 2014

September 19, 2014 – 4:26pm, by Giorgi Lomsadze

Scotland’s dabbling in secessionism has been closely watched in the
ex-Soviet Union, the Shangri-La of separatism. From Transnistria to
Karabakh to Crimea, all eyes have been on the UK recently, in hopes
that the Scottish example would change hearts and minds about claims
to independence.

In South Ossetia, approaching, on September 20, the 24th anniversary
of declaring itself independent from Georgia, many were inspired by
the “peaceful and civilized” conduct of the Brits. Abkhazia produced
a video, in which a group of people unfurl a giant Scottish flag to
the sound of Mel Gibson bellowing “Freedom!” in Braveheart.

Yet with Scotland’s September-18 vote to stay with the United Kingdom
these public expressions of separatist-solidarity with Scotland have
suddenly fallen silent. Only Nagorno Karabakh, which itself has seen
a referendum proposed as part of the solution to its differences with
Baku, issued a statement, observing that “regardless of the result,”
the Scottish referendum had shown that letting people decide their
own fate is “the norm in a democratic society.”

Countries like Azerbaijan and Georgia with separatism problems
also had watched the vote with concern and tried to underscore the
difference of their situations, marked by military conflict and
the disenfranchisement of populations forced to flee the breakaway
territories. Although neither government issued an official statement,
on social media, the vote for the UK was seen as an indirect
confirmation of local arguments for unity.

For Moscow, now busy expanding its portfolio of sponsored breakaway
territories, the Scottish vote earlier had been seen as an exoneration
of its support for separatism in its neighborhood. Russian Senator
Igor Morozov was positive that the outcome of the poll would herald
a new “world order,” reported Vestnik Kavkaza news service.

“We know that there is a global struggle between two directions:
the principle of territorial integrity and nations’ rights to
self-determination, so today’s referendum in Scotland will become an
impulse to changing the world order altogether,” he reasoned.

But that order did not change. Russia, which had betted on a yes-vote,
did not let the opportunity slip to offer some recommendations,
however. Its four observers claimed the vote “did not meet
international standards,” The Guardian reported. For one, the site
for the vote-count was “too big.”

In Ukraine, the self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic cut to
the chase — falsification explained the vote for the UK, Interfax
reported.

At this rate, despite Morozov’s predictions, the battle of principles
— self-determination (Russian-assisted or otherwise) against
territorial integrity — looks set to stick around for some time
to come.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/70076