The Rich To Pay Higher Price For Luxury?

THE RICH TO PAY HIGHER PRICE FOR LUXURY?

Tert.am
17:12 01.11.11

Those sectors of economy which have big profits will have to pay
higher taxes next year, according to the prime minister.

Introducing the 2012 Draft Budget at the National Assembly on Tuesday,
Tigran Sargsyan said the country’s basic financial document envisages
more favorable conditions for small- and medium-sized businesses next
year, proposing higher tax burdens for enterprises with higher profits.

It came after president Serzh Sargsyan hosted a discussion over the
tax package with the representatives of the ruling coalition.

“We have received the first ever proposal to impose a luxury tax. We
propose essentially higher taxes on expensive cars whose price exceeds
$90,000,” the premier said, adding that such tax policy will help
increase the tax revenues by 1 million drams (approx $2,700).

The tax package proposes that people with a higher income (2 million
Drams or about $5,400 and more) pay 5% more taxes (25% of income).

The premier added that the proposed amendments also will also apply
to alcoholic beverages.

“Taxes will be levied more on expensive alcoholic drinks. Their
tax burden will increase by 50% compared to cheaper beverages for
which the 500 Dram [about $1.35] margin will remain unchanged,”
the premier added.

Kardashian Files For Divorce

KARDASHIAN FILES FOR DIVORCE

Tert.am
09:44 01.11.11

Just 10 weeks after her star-studded, made-for-TV wedding, reality
starlet Kim Kardashian filed for divorce Monday from pro basketball
player Kris Humphries, citing irreconcilable differences, BlueRidgeNow
reported.

“I hope everyone understands this was not an easy decision,” said
the “Keeping Up With the Kardashians” star in a statement. “I had
hoped this marriage was forever but sometimes things don’t work out
as planned.”

The filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court provided few details,
other than to state the couple have a prenuptial agreement that will
dictate how they divide up their assets. Kardashian is asking that
both sides pay their own attorneys’ costs and that a judge terminate
Humphries’ rights to spousal support.

Kardashian, 31, and Humphries, 26, were wed Aug. 20 at a lavish private
estate near Santa Barbara, California. It was the first marriage
for Humphries, who last played for the NBA’s New Jersey Nets, and
the second for Kardashian, who was married to music producer Damon
Thomas from 2000 to 2004.

Kardashian’s sisters and TV co-stars Kourtney Kardashian, 32, and
Khloe Kardashian, 27, served as co-maids of honor.

Kim Kardashian and Humphries began dating late last year and announced
their engagement in May. He proposed on bended knee with a 20.5-carat
ring by spelling out “Will you marry me?” in rose petals.

The couple’s marriage was the subject of a two-part special on E!

Entertainment Television, which televises Kardashian’s show that
follows the model and her family.

Court filings show that Kardashian signed the petition on Sunday.

Kardashian said she and Humphries “remain friends and wish each other
the best.”

Kardashian’s divorce attorney, Laura Wasser, did not return a phone
message seeking comment.

How An Armenian Filmmaker Got The ‘G-Word’ In A Turkish Movie

HOW AN ARMENIAN FILMMAKER GOT THE ‘G-WORD’ IN A TURKISH MOVIE
By Artsvi Bakhchinyan

Thu, Nov 3 2011

The name Eric Nazarian is not unknown to Armenia’s film audiences. For
three years, from 2008-10, the Armenian American film director
participated in the Golden Apricot International Film Festival in
Yerevan. His first feature film as writer-director, “The Blue Hour,”
was awarded four prizes in 2008: the Golden Apricot for Best Film in
the Armenian Panorama, the Ecumenical Jury Award, the Prime Minister’s
Award, and the Diaspora Ministry’s Special Award for Directing.

Filmmakers Eric Nazarian and Aida Begic on the set of Bolis It was a
nice surprise to learn that Nazarian’s next movie has been made in
Turkey, as part of an international omnibus project called “Do Not
Forget Me, Istanbul.” The film premiere took place at the Istanbul Film
Festival last April and is currently on the festival circuit. In the
film, seven different filmmakers present some scenes from the life
of the various ethnic minorities of Istanbul. Josephina Markarian,
a Greek Armenian currently living in Istanbul, also joined the project.

Nazarian, who was born in Armenia and has lived in the U.S. since
he was a child, presents a personal story of his compatriot who
is the descendant of one of the oldest communities of the city on
the Bosphorus. In 18 minutes, Nazarian’s film, entitled “Bolis,”
captures the everyday life, conversations, and brief encounter between
a Diasporan Armenian musician, Armenak, and a Turkish widow. Through
their encounter, the tragic history of one nation is unraveled through
Armenak’s story.

Theirs is a simple story reminding us about the presence of the
past within the modern-day psyche of Armenians worldwide and the
responsibility of the inheritors on both sides to speak openly about
a history that has been buried but refuses to be forgotten. Below, my
conversation with Nazarian reveals some aspects of this unprecedented
Armenian-Turkish cooperation.

Artsvi Bakhchinyan: Eric, nowadays news of Armenian-Turkish
collaboration doesn’t surprise one as it used to. But how did you
come to join this project?

Eric Nazarian: My friend Cigdem Mater introduced the project to me.

Huseyin Karabey, the producer, invited me to participate in the
omnibus. The theme of what we remember and what we force ourselves
to forget is important for me as an Armenian and as a filmmaker. The
goal of the project that was initially pitched to me was to remind
Istanbul through these films of the past cultures that contributed
to what the city is today. These past cultures have over time been
“forgotten,” hence the title “Do Not Forget Me, Istanbul.” I felt my
story of Armenak’s journey to Bolis (Istanbul) fit thematically. The
film is based on my feature screenplay “Bolis,” which follows Armenak
from Los Angeles to Istanbul to find his grandfather’s oudshop and
a family heirloom that disappeared during the Armenian Genocide.

Nazarian’s Bolis (Photo by Jacky Nercessian) A.B.: You were born in
Armenia, your parents came from Iran, now you live in the U.S. What
is Armenian Bolis for you?

E.N.: When I was a child, I went to American school on weekdays and
Armenian school on weekends. Everything I learned about cinema,
literature, and art I owe a tremendous gratitude to my beloved
father Haik, aunt Parik, uncle Haso, and my entire family who raised
me to appreciate the cultures and arts of all nations. My first
recollection of this term “Bolis” is from my beloved grandfather
Hovhannes who would tell me these beautiful and textured stories of all
the writers and poets of Constaninople, as Istanbul was called in the
days of black and white Daguerrotype photographs. He introduced me to
Daniel Varoujan, Siamanto, Krikor Zohrab. My aunt Parik introduced
me to Gomidas Vartabed. My father Haik, who was a photographer,
introduced me to the timeless images of Ara Guler. My grandfather,
father, and aunt taught me about the amazing Armenian heritage and
culture of Bolis. When I went back to make my film, I wanted to pay
tribute to this world of “Old Bolis” through music because cinema is
an audiovisual medium. For me, cinema is my wife. Music is my mistress.

The music of Udi Hrant Kenkulian is the essence of Istanbul Armenian
blues. What Ray Charles was to soul and blues, Udi Hrant is to
Armenian/Turkish music: a true legend. When I first heard him in
college, I didn’t know he was blind. When I read more about his
life, his music resonated with me even more. “Srdis Vra Kar Muh Gah”
is every bit as pure and powerful as the great blues spirituals of
the Mississippi Delta of the ’30s and ’40s. The first day I docked
in Istanbul, I told my assistant to take me straight to the Sisli
Armenian Gregorian Cemetery, where I visited Udi Hrant’s family plot
and later shot a pivotal scene in the film. It was an honor and deeply
humbling to be standing by the ground where he rests.

A.B.: I completely agree with your hero, that Istanbul is a kind of
opium. That city is very addictive.

E.N.: Istanbul for me is a paradox and a mystery. It’s an onion
I peeled everyday knowing I would never get to its core. The city
is too complex and full of so much history. I’m not sure if it is
possible to uncover even a fraction. I arrived in Istanbul with
extremely mixed emotions. When the plane docked, my mind fluttered
with all the images of Armin Wegner and the archive photos of the
Near East Relief during the time of the genocide: the deportations,
Gomidas, Siamanto, Daniel Varoujan, and all the intellectuals and
members of society arrested on that awful day [April 24, 1915]. I
arrived tensed up and angry, but thanks to my friends and Bolsa-Hyes
[Istanbul Armenians], I soon realized that a part of my cultural
DNA truly hails from there. There are certain streets in Istanbul
that inspired an extremely uncanny sense of deja-vu. I still don’t
know how to describe this feeling. It felt as if I was coming home,
yet I knew I was still a stranger in this city. It was a very bizarre
but also very poetic state of mind to be drifting in. I realized in
this state that not genocide, not persecution, not politics can ever
dilute or diminish the extraordinary contributions of the Armenian
people to the architecture, culture, history, heritage, music, and
society of Istanbul. From Mimar Sinan and the Balian brothers, to the
high priests of architecture in Istanbul to Udi Hrant, Hrant Dink,
and beyond, some of the greatest minds and spirits of the Armenian
people hail from Bolis. Yes, as much as I felt an “ambivalence,” as the
character Armenak says in the film, I also felt that the city was very
“addictive.” Between “ambivalence” and “addictive” I think these two
words come close to describing this paradox that Istanbul is for me.

A.B.: In our days it seems to be in fashion to depict a “return to
the roots.” But the return of your hero, Armenak Mouradian, seems to
be quite different…

E.N.: Journeying to our roots does not begin or end with one or two
or three journeys. I think every day, we journey a little bit into the
past of our families and collective culture of humanity, be it Armenia
or Greece, Mexico or Russia. I love world culture, so for me every day
is a journey to my roots as an Armenian, but more importantly, as a
human being capable of being touched by artists from around the world.

The character of Armenak in my film feels a foreboding uncertainty;
at the same time, he feels a duty as an Armenian to face the past
and go in search of it, like any mythological character on a quest to
find a place or a person. I’m realizing more and more that whatever
we end up looking for in the “outside” world, ends up becoming an
“interior” journey to discover our souls and what our calling in
life is. For Armenak, the search for his grandfather’s oud shop
that was destroyed on April 24, 1915 is a part of his calling. The
discovery of this place unleashes the pain and the transcendence
he needs to be able to fully accept what happened in 1915. It is
my hope that audiences will start to realize, especially in Turkey,
that the vast majority of what we call the Western Armenian Diaspora
was created because of the genocide. Why else would Hadjn-tsis end up
in Argentina, or Musa Ler-tsis in Port Said, or Cilician Armenians in
Marseilles? They boarded the first ships that would carry them away
from the massacres and deportations. And now, almost a hundred years
later, for the descendants of the genocide like Armenak, April 24,
1915 is still yesterday.

A.B.: For the first time, the word “genocide” has been used in a
Turkish film. How did it happen? What was the reaction during the
premiere in Istanbul?

E.N.: For me, it was absolutely fundamental that my film clearly
and openly use the word “genocide.” It is a part of my character’s
psyche and history. It is what happened to my people, so of course
I will speak about it very clearly. It was also a condition of my
participation that I speak freely about the genocide. I was not there
at the premiere in Istanbul, as I was finishing a dear friend’s film.

My jigerov actors, Jacky Nercessian and Serra Yilmaz, were present.

They told me that the entire audience was rapt in silence during the
monologue scene. When Armenak’s character says, “…my grandmother’s
entire family from Aintab and Arabkir disappeared during the genocide,”
Jacky painted a nice picture of the audience sitting in front of
him. Nearly every head turned to its neighbor in disbelief over
hearing the word. I was very moved to hear that the film resonated
with a lot of people. My friends from Golden Apricot were present
in the audience that night and wrote a very beautiful email to me,
saying how touched the audience was. I really want to make films that
can bridge the gap between Armenians and Turks. It is time to shake
things up and find new ways to communicate through cinema. We have
the potential to understand our common humanity through dialogue and
discuss the past with whoever is open and willing to listen and share
stories. This is one of many ways forward. Politicians will continue
to argue, shake hands, sign documents, and smile for the cameras. They
are the international diplomats. Artists on the other hand, are the
cultural diplomats and bridge builders between cultures.

Let politics take its course and let the artists create freely. I
must say how proud I am of the Armenian Turkish Cinema Platform at the
Golden Apricot International Film Festival in Yerevan for continuing
to push this dialogue by inviting Armenian and Turkish filmmakers to
exchange ideas and make films together.

A.B.: The acting by the two main characters is quite impressive. There
could not have been a better choice than Jacky Nercessian, but I
was surprised to see Turkish actress Serra Yilmaz, whom I have seen
previously in two Italian films on gay issues.

E.N.: Jacky Nercessian I remember from when I was in junior high
school from Henri Verneuil’s “Mayrig” film. I met him in Paris some
years ago when I was screening my first feature film, “The Blue Hour.”

I’ll never forget what an impression he made on me. He looks like the
Armenian Ben Kingsley. Full of so much life. I am very grateful to
Atom Egoyan who recommended Jacky at the Golden Apricot Film Festival.

I reconnected with him and we pledged to work together. Also, my dear
friend Vahe Berberian was a great inspiration. I initially wrote
the role of Armenak for Vahe. My aunt Parik Nazarian was my hero
and talisman throughout this entire journey, inspiring me with the
music of Gomidas and the song, “Surp Garabed Em Gnatsel” that opens
the film. Serra Yilmaz is a barekam [friend]. She is a natural-born
actress with such an incredible soul. I hope I will be making films
with Jacky and Serra for years to come. We had an amazing working
relationship on set. This experience would not have been the same
without their total support of the story I needed to tell.

A.B.: I noticed that the bright and dark scenes are juxtaposed in your
film. Did you do this on purpose? Also, the shadows play an essential
role in film, and seem to symbolize how many things are shadowed in
this city…

E.N.: My background is in photojournalism and cinematography, so
naturally everything begins with making the right images tell the
story. I wanted to make “Bolis” an intimate and panoramic vision of the
story. That’s why there are so many locations, from the Bosphorus to
the amazing antique shops in Kadikoy, to the Zincirlikuyu cemetery,
to the back alleys of Cukur Cuma, to a nightclub in the heart of
Istanbul, to the Armenian cemetery in Sisli. The entire city is light
and shadow. In a color film shot on HD, I wanted to let the shadows
sink into Jacky’s face when he talks about the dark chapter in his
family’s history in the basement of the antique shop. Serra has such
an evocative and expressive face. We tried to light her as minimally
as possible because her eyes do all the talking, Jacky has such an
incredible presence on screen. With HD, you can get away with not
lighting too much, which means you can shoot faster. That’s a blessing,
especially if you have so many locations. I really enjoyed working with
my production crew. We were zigzagging all over Istanbul making a movie
about a Turk and an Armenian finding a common bond. I knew this was a
special project and wanted it to be an ode to my family who inspired
me to create cinema and a love letter to the heritage of Old Bolis.

A.B.: One of the most important components in the film is the music…

E.N.: Music is central to the film. I wanted to open with “Surp
Garabed” over Jacky’s journey from the European side of Istanbul to the
Anatolian side, where he goes to an authentic oud shop to get his oud
re-stringed. Then we cut to haunting Turkish blues sung by an Armenian
lady from Erzerum or Kayseri. We discovered the song on a very old LP
that the gentleman who owned the antique store introduced me to. He
was a rare collector of antique gramophones and Coca-Cola knick-knacks
from the ’40s and ’50s. It was a trip down memory lane. I love the
antique shops in Kadikoy. I could easily spend a month roaming through
them in search of that lost past of the city that somehow never goes
away. It is present on every corner in the city.

Thanks to my dear friend Maral Aktokmakian, from the amazing Aras
Armenian publishing house in Istanbul, and her husband Arto Erdogan.

They introduced me to Taniel Akhbareeg (little brother) who is the
oud player from the wonderful band “Knar.” Taniel Akhbareeg hails
from Dikranagerd. He performed the solo of “Sari Sirun Yar” that
closes the film. I am indebted to Maral, Arto, and Taniel for their
love and support during the making of this film. This film and my
experience in Istanbul would never have been the same without them.

A.B.: And when we can see your film in Armenia?

E.N.: Hopefully we will screen it this year during the wonderful
Golden Apricot International Film Festival.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2011/11/03/armenian-filmmaker/

Threat Of Absolutism

THREAT OF ABSOLUTISM
Naira Hayrumyan

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 12:43:06 – 03/11/2011

Hovik Abrahamyan, underlining the importance of the upcoming
elections in Armenia, stated that it is important to hold free and
democratic elections from the point of European integration. The
German ambassador to Armenia also stated that the upcoming elections
may play an important role regarding the EU Association Agreement.

What can “hinder” Serzh Sargsyan to hold free and fair elections
without prejudice to himself and the current status of the Republican
Party?

In the beginning it was predicted that the obstacle could be the
force led by Levon Ter-Petrosyan, which threatened to take all active
citizens to streets. But, judging by the situation, Serzh Sargsyan
succeeded in neutralizing that force through the dialogue, or maybe,
even with the help of a promise to “pick out” several parliamentary
seats for them. It is already evident that Ter-Petrosyan accepted the
new rules of the game – if formerly the Armenian National Congress
dwelt on the change of power and full transformation of the system,
now it announces about pursuing as many parliamentary seats as to be
able to launch impeachment. So, it is necessary to presume that if
the Congress solves this task and receives 15% of mandates, it will
have no reason to argue the election outcome.

Who else can “hinder” the free elections? Retired oligarchs who used
to bring votes for the Republican Party? But Serzh Sargsyan is trying
not to offend them and not to become hostile to them. Though they
have no political support to which they could go if offended by Serzh
Sargsyan. Behind the scene, Kocharyan’s internal-governmental pole
had almost been formed but now the lawmakers of the Prosperous Armenia
Party can breathe freely – they don’t have to go to the opposition. It
has been agreed that they will be allies for another 5-6 years. And
they will again help the Republicans to receive votes to at least
maintain the current number of seats. If in spring Tsarukyan used to
say that he was going to get an overwhelming majority in parliament,
now he has significantly lowered the bar.

It is noteworthy that the society is happy that Serzh Sargsyan was
able to repress Kocharyan’s ambitions. Interestingly, such moods can
be observed within the opposition too. It is good that Kocharyan’s
forces failed to “break through” but Serzh Sargsyan’s “victory”
means that absolutism will be kept and strengthened in the country.

Now, each will consider it their duty to give an oath of loyalty to
Serzh Sargsyan or at least not to “hinder” him. The vertical of the
authorities is becoming stronger, and it is only left to find out
whether Armenia is happy with such alignment of forces. In spring,
the society had a chance to break down the absolute vertical and to
create a real multi-polar parliament which could reflect the interests
of the citizens and could have counterbalances. But there is still
a chance evidence to which is the words of the ANC representative
that the involvement in the parliament is necessary to achieve Serzh
Sargsyan’s resignation.

But we thought the parliament had to have leverages of influence on
state arbitrary decisions, to deprive the president of absolute power
and make him take into account the society. If the parliament is this
way, the society can accept any president, even Serzh Sargsyan.

So, nothing “hinders” to hold free and fair elections in spring. Sure
if, nothing changes in the approaches of political forces in these
months and if they do not realize the danger of absolutism in the
country.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments24054.html

UNESCO Conference: Palestine Issue And Preservation Of Armenian Cult

UNESCO CONFERENCE: PALESTINE ISSUE AND PRESERVATION OF ARMENIAN CULTURAL-HISTORICAL HERITAGE
By Aris Ghazinyan

ArmeniaNow
03.11.11 | 15:37

On October 31 in Paris a rare event took place: Armenia and Azerbaijan
took the same stance on one of important issues of international
political life. The event is outstanding also because, for example,
Georgia – which more often sides with Azerbaijan on such matters –
took the contrary position.

The event was the voting at the United Nation’s Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) on accepting Palestine
as its member.

At UNESCO an issue can be approved by 2/3 majority of votes, which
was the case with Palestine. 107 countries voted for Palestine’s
membership in UNESCO, among them Russia, Brazil, China, India, France,
Turkey, the South African Republic, and others. According to Reuters,
14 countries voted against, among them the USA, Canada and Germany,
and 52 countries abstained (among them Great Britain).

Georgia’s position was dictated by its connections with Washington and
Berlin, whereas Azerbaijan and Armenia were guided by the former’s
attitude to Muslim countries of the region and, in Armenia’s case,
the close relations between Armenians and Arabs.

With this said, however, it by no means implies “improved relations”
of Yerevan and Baku.

Moreover, when Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandyan delivered a
speech at the 36th session of the UNESCO General Conference in Paris,
the main focus of his statement was the “preservation of the Armenian
historical-cultural heritage in the neighboring countries”, rather
than the Palestinian issue.

Bringing Iran as an example of a caring attitude towards Armenian
culture, the minister, naturally, could not bypass the ever-urgent
issue of destruction of unique Armenian khachkars (stone crosses)
of Old Jugha (or Julfa), and qualified Azerbaijan’s barbaric policy
as manifestation of “blind hatred”.

Almost six years have passed since the December when Baku dealt
shortly with the last of khachkars at the medieval Armenian cemetery
of Nakhijevan. Unfortunately, neither the Armenian side nor the
international human rights community succeeded in delegating an expert
commission to the region.

It is commonly believed that French-Armenian chanson singer Charles
Aznavour is the Armenian Ambassador to UNESCO. However, that’s not
quite the case: Aznavour’s appointment to that position in 1995 was
rather symbolic. Nonetheless, Aznavour’s name and authority granted
unique advantages which Armenia has failed to make use of and direct
the attention of the international community to the preservation
issue of Armenian cultural monuments in the world.

>From this point of view mutual relations and the work of the Armenian
diplomacy in UNESCO need a new impulse. Especially that the former
administration of that organization as represented by Director-General
Koichiro Matsuura displayed criminal indifference to the fate of the
Armenian khachkars, despite the persistently voiced alarms of public
figures and human rights activists of different countries. It should
be noted that in Paris Nalbandyan met new Director-General Irina
Bokova and invited her to Yerevan.

OSCE Secretary General Sees No Progress In Karabakh Peace Process

OSCE SECRETARY GENERAL SEES NO PROGRESS IN KARABAKH PEACE PROCESS

arminfo
Wednesday, November 2, 12:19

The newly elected secretary-general of the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Lamberto Zannier said in an interview
with Today’s Zaman on Tuesday that Turkey could play an important role
in the decades-long conflict in the disputed area of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Lamberto Zannier said: “Turkey is an important player in the region.

It has a political contribution to offer.” “I am stating a fact —
it [progress] is not happening. Something is missing,” said Zannier.

According to Zannier, Turkey’s involvement need not be an official
one. “I am not talking about a formal role in the negotiations,
but in real terms. Turkey is bordering both countries involved in
the conflict,” he said.

Zannier, emphasizing the importance of dialogue in solving any
conflict, ventured, “My very personal view is that Turkey needs to
create conditions to promote dialogue on both sides.”

But how Turkey goes about this specifically is “Turkey’s call,”
Zannier added. “I am not saying we have a monopoly, but why shouldn’t
it be the OSCE? It is a regional organization that deals with security
issues. There is a debate that we should move the issues somewhere
else but I am not convinced that moving it elsewhere would solve the
problem. There is nothing wrong with the organization dealing with
the problem. The problem is the substance of the issue,” he said in
response to criticisms of the OSCE’s handling of the conflict.

While the OSCE is doing the best it can, Zannier said it is up to the
parties involved in the conflict to step up to the plate. Zannier
stressed there must be political will on behalf of the parties to
end the historic conflict. “What I said this morning was there is a
lot of focus on the mechanism, but there is also an issue of whether
the parties are ready to make a deal,” he said.

While Zannier said that the mechanism could perhaps be improved,
he also emphasized that in the end the power lies with the member
countries. “You can lead a horse to water but you cannot force the
horse to drink. It is a bit the same. We are trying to create the
necessary conditions in the meantime. We are trying to manage the
situation on the ground, but the situation becomes problematic in
security terms,” he said.

The next step, according to the OSCE secretary general, is ensuring
the problem does not escalate further. “[In general,] if we cannot
line up all of the conditions and solve the conflict, then the next
best thing we can do is manage the problem so it does not grow worse.

So that is our next step. It is up to everyone to keep making efforts
from different angles,” he stressed.

Turkish Parliament Exerting Efforts To Block International Recogniti

TURKISH PARLIAMENT EXERTING EFFORTS TO BLOCK INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

arminfo
Wednesday, November 2, 12:10

Committed Turkish historian Yusuf Halacoglu, who was elected to
the Parliament of Turkey from Nationalist Movement Party (MHP),
ex-president of the Turkish historical society, is going to start
lobbying in the Turkish Parliament against international recognition
of the Armenian Genocide.

Turkish Aksam Agency reports that Speaker Cemil Cicek known with his
radical anti-Armenian statements will head the new lobby. Halacoglu
said that measures are required to “stop” Armenia as the year 2015
is approaching.

The given problem is above the party issues, he said, and added that
Armenian are preparing for the centennial of the 1915 and Turkish
parties can do the necessary work in the international platforms.

Turkey Can Have An Essential Role In Karabakh Conflict Resolution

TURKEY CAN HAVE AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN KARABAKH CONFLICT RESOLUTION

yerkir.am
11:39 – 02.11.2011

“Turkey can have an essential role in Karabakh conflict regulation”,
said OSCE MG general secretary Lamberto Zanier during his interview
with turkish “Zaman”.

He believes that there’s no need for Turkey to officially get involved
in that progress.

“Being a neighbor of a conflict party Turkey is already involved in
that conflict”, said he and added that that country can make suitable
conditions for negotiations between the two countries.

“There’s an idea that Karabakh issue must be transferred to another
phase, however, I’m not sure that it will work”, said Zanier and added
that they are doing everything to make suitable conditions, control
the situation, which becomes problematic in security point of view.

He announced that “If we can’t do anything to help then we shouldn’t
interfere at all”.

OSCE Secretary General Sees Role For Turkey In Karabakh

OSCE SECRETARY GENERAL SEES ROLE FOR TURKEY IN KARABAKH

asbarez
Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

OSCE Secretary-General Lamberto Zannier

ISTANBUL-The newly-elected OSCE Secretary-General Lamberto Zannier
said on Tuesday that Turkey could play a role in the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict resolution process.

In an interview with the Turkish newspaper, Today’s Zaman, Zannier,
an Italian diplomat who was voted as the new OSCE leader, said that
Turkey’s involvement is not necessarily an official one. “I am not
talking about a formal role in the negotiations, but in real terms.

Turkey is bordering both countries involved in the conflict,” he
reportedly told Zaman.

“I am stating a fact – it [progress] is not happening. Something is
missing,” Zannier told Zaman.

Zannier emphasized the importance of dialogue in resolving conflicts
said that “My very personal view is that Turkey needs to create
conditions to promote dialogue on both sides.” He said the specifics
of this involvement are “Turkey’s call.”

“There is a debate that we should move the issues somewhere else but
I am not convinced that moving it elsewhere would solve the problem.

There is nothing wrong with the organization dealing with the problem.

The problem is the substance of the issue,” said Zannier of recent
efforts by Azerbaijan to criticize the OSCE for its handling of
the issue.

He said that while the OSCE is doing its best, it is up to the parties
involved in the conflict to step up to the plate. Zannier stressed
there must be political will on behalf of the parties to end the
historic conflict.

“There is a lot of focus on the mechanism, but there is also an issue
of whether the parties are ready to make a deal,” added Zannier.

“You can lead a horse to water but you cannot force the horse to drink
it. We are trying to create the necessary conditions in the meantime.

We are trying to manage the situation on the ground, but the situation
becomes problematic in security terms,” he said. The next step,
according to the OSCE secretary general, is ensuring the problem does
not escalate further.

“[In general,] if we cannot line up all of the conditions and solve
the conflict, then the next best thing we can do is manage the problem
so it does not grow worse. So that is our next step. It is up to
everyone to keep making efforts from different angles,” he stressed.

ANKARA: Zero Neighbors Without Problems

ZERO NEIGHBORS WITHOUT PROBLEMS
by JOOST LAGENDIJK

Today’s Zaman
Nov 1 2011
Turkey

Most analysts of Turkey’s foreign policy during the last couple of
years will never say so aloud. They are either too polite or make the
calculation that making fun of Ankara’s recent global activism will
not go down well with the Justice and Development Party (AK Party)
leadership, with whom they will have to work for the foreseeable
future. But in private or behind the scenes, they make jokes about
the so-called “zero problems with neighbors” policy and the person
who came up with the concept, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

The phrase most often used ridicules the concept of “zero problems”
and states that, instead of having less problems with its neighbors,
Turkey is faced with a growing number of highly problematic situations
along its borders. Davutoglu’s tireless efforts to practice his own
ideas have not created zero problems with neighbors but zero neighbors
without problems. The list of proof is discouragingly long.

Accession negotiations with the EU are stalled and relations with
Cyprus are still very bad. Efforts to improve the relations with
Armenia have failed and have led to suspicion and bad feelings
among the “brothers” in Baku. Until recently the theocrats in
Tehran were quite happy with Turkey’s support in their dispute with
the international community on Iran’s nuclear program. But after
Turkey agreed to host US radars as part of a new NATO missile defense
shield and turned against Iran’s most important regional ally, Syria,
bitter accusations by senior Iranian officials have been leveled at
the Turkish government. Add to that inventory the harsh rhetoric
and broken diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel and the
remarkable change of policy towards the regime in Damascus, turning
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from friend to foe, and it is not
difficult to see why many cynical pundits come to the conclusion
that the net result of Davutoglu’s numerous and energetic activities
is negative. Despite good intentions and an impressive intellectual
foundation, the former academic has not managed to create a ring of
friends around Turkey.

This week the German Marshall Fund (GMF) published an interesting
report on the implications of the Arab Spring for Turkish foreign
policy. One of the authors, Nathalie Tocci, Italy’s most knowledgeable
Turkey expert, is careful in her criticism of Ankara’s actions abroad
but nevertheless her analysis must be painful for many at the Foreign
Ministry. For good reason she makes a difference between the short-term
effects of the Arab Spring and the medium and long-term opportunities
that the changes in the Middle East may present to Turkey. According to
Tocci, the uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria have revealed a number
of inconsistencies in Turkish foreign policy and have brought to the
forefront the “inherent tension between the normative and realpolitik
dimensions” of Davutoglu’s strategy. In Egypt, Turkey was on the side
of democracy from the start, largely because there has always been
an implicit rivalry between the two countries and, at the same time,
a lack of strong economic ties. In Libya, $15 billion in investment
and 25,000 Turkish citizens made Turkey much more cautious. In Syria,
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan first had to experience
his close to zero influence on Syrian dictator Assad before Turkey
was willing to abandon its wait-and-see approach.

The good thing about the GMF report is that it does not only highlight
the contradictions and limits of Turkish foreign policy. Several
contributors make the point that Turkey has a huge potential to play
a dominant role in positively influencing the eventual outcome of the
Arab revolutions. In order to do that, the authors suggest structured
cooperation between Turkey and two other interested parties in the
region, the EU and the US. That will definitively not be easy, they
admit, but it should at least be tried seriously.

As for all global players, the big challenge for Turkish foreign
policy is to find the right balance between high principles and smart
concepts on the one hand and effective interventions and practical
proposals on the other. Davutoglu has to prove the cynics wrong who
think that his theories do not work in the real world. One way of
doing so is to admit that there are still plenty of problems with
neighbors and that Turkey is willing to work with every constructive
partner to solve them. Better forget about zero problems in this part
of the world. Be happy when you end up with less.