Caucasian Enemies Engage In Unofficial Trade

CAUCASIAN ENEMIES ENGAGE IN UNOFFICIAL TRADE
By Sabuhi Mammedli in Baku, Lusine Musaelian in Stepanakert and Naira Melkumian in Yerevan

A1+
[05:27 pm] 15 June, 2007

Karabakh conflict doesn’t stop Armenians and Azeris buying each
others’ goods.

Armenia and Azerbaijan have no official ties but goods from the two
neighbours manage to slip round the closed borders and into each
others’ shops despite official efforts to keep them out.

Even shops in Nagorno-Karabakh, where ethnic Armenians broke free of
Azeri control in a war that ended in 1994 but still poisons relations
between Baku and Yerevan, stock Azeri tea. It is, residents say,
too good to miss out on.

"I have Azeri tea in my shop, and it is much in demand here," said
shop assistant Ashot Hayrapetian.

"We buy this tea in Yerevan and sell it in great quantities. The tea
is very popular with old people, who say that once you’ve tasted it,
you will want no other tea."

Across the border, which is still patrolled by troops and bristling
with weapons, Azeri shops occasionally stock Armenian brandy, the
country’s most famous export.

Azerbaijani Salekh Mamedov, 52, who is a lover of wine and port,
told IWPR he didn’t mind drinking good cognac, even if it was Armenian.

"I still remember how Ararat tasted," he said, referring to the most
famous Armenian brand of brandy.

"Of course, we can’t forget about the lost lands, but goods don’t
matter, do they?"

But many people on both sides of the border think they do matter,
saying buying such products amounts to giving support to the enemy.

"Armenian goods are mostly smuggled in through markets on the border
between Georgia and Armenia," said Eyub Husseinov, chairman of
Azerbaijan’s Free Consumers Association.

"Trains for Baku and Yerevan depart from the railway station in
Tbilisi every 40 minutes. In that time, many Azerbaijanis and Armenians
communicate and even trade with each other. I have seen this with my
own eyes more than once."

Azerbaijan’s state customs department said such unofficial trade was
the only real source of Armenian goods in Azerbaijan.

"The few Armenian goods that emerge on the local counters now and then
are mainly brought in from Georgia by individuals and in allowable
quantities," said a spokesman.

"These may be confined to two or three boxes of cigarettes or a couple
of bottles of cognac. What can the customs do in such cases? Citizens
themselves should have enough patriotic spirit to stop them buying
goods made in the enemy country."

Occasionally, shops are found selling Armenian goods.

A shop in Baku was caught selling Armenian coffee wholesale last
year. The whole stock was confiscated and destroyed.

"Just the other day, our agents found napkins made by a ‘Markarian
AE’ on the shelves of a shop in the Khachmaz district," said
Husseinov. Markarian is a typical Armenian name.

"The owner of the shop said he had brought them from Georgia, that
when buying them he did not pay attention to the label."

He said Jubilee brandy, Areni wines and Cigarone cigarettes were
among the most popular Armenian goods in Azerbaijan.

"The bottle of the Areni wine bears a label that shows a map of
Armenia embracing Nagorny Karabakh – our lands! – as part of it," he
said angrily. "How dare citizens of Azerbaijan buy these goods and –
what’s worse – bring them into the country?"

One 47-year-old owner of a wine shop in the centre of Baku said that
Armenian brandy did appear in his shop now and then.

"My partner in Georgia sends the brandy to me every three or four
months," he said. "Sometimes it is ten bottles a time. I must admit
that Armenian cognac has always been in demand here because of its
good quality and taste. I have regular clients who favour this cognac."

Tea is nowadays the only Azeri product to be seen in Karabakh’s shops
and markets, although over the years chocolate, sweets and flour have
also been sold there.

Valery Simonian, chief of quality control at Nagorny Karabakh’s
ministry for territorial management and infrastructure development,
said goods that had no Armenian information on their packaging were
banned from sale in Karabakh.

"We are entitled to deliver a written warning or ban this or that
product from sale," said Simonian. "But goods are imported by private
traders and we are not in a position to control every one of them."

A saleswoman called Anahit in Stepanakert told IWPR that customers
could choose between Azerbaijan’s Azerchai tea and tea imported
from Turkey.

"But Azerchai sells better, as it is cheaper and of a higher quality,"
said Anahit. "Besides, it is Azeri tea, not Turkish tea that is famous
all over the world for its taste and properties."

Azerchai is also popular in Armenia, especially among Armenians who
fled Azerbaijan during the armed conflict.

"I always buy this tea, because its brew is so strong and wonderful,"
said Yerevan resident Tatiana Babaian, 55, who used to live in
Baku. "Baku Armenians are famous tea-drinkers."

"Most probably, this is contraband, which should not be allowed into
trade outlets, but the market is difficult to control," said Anahit
Voskanian, spokesman for Armenia’s economy and trade ministry.

"Even if there were many officers, they wouldn’t be able to monitor
the whole of Armenia and Karabakh. The same applies to the trade in
Armenian cognac in Azerbaijan."

Armenian customs officials say no large quantities of Azeri goods
had entered the country for three years, and the trade was conducted
by individuals.

"Armenia’s laws don’t forbid importation of commodities from a
country with which we have no diplomatic ties," Gagik Kocharian,
head of the trade and services department at the trade and economy
ministry, told IWPR.

"There’s no avoiding the fact we are neighbours with Armenia," Novruz
Mamedov, chief of the international relations department of the Azeri
presidential administration, told the APA news agency.

"Of course, political, economic and cultural relations between our
countries will be restored one day.

However, so long as our lands remain occupied by Armenia, it’s wrong
to bring their goods into our country and thus help them earn money."

And some residents refuse to even countenance buying goods that
originate over the border.

Ashraf Aliev, a 39-year-old resident of Baku, said he could not
understand people who sold Armenian goods in Azerbaijan nor those
who bought them.

"We have no shortage of any sort of commodities. So why should we
use Armenian goods? They would not mind poisoning us and doing harm
to us once more," he said.

Karabakh resident Marina, 42, is equally wary of Azeri products.

"Even in the starving war years, we never used the flour that was
brought in from Baku for free, and, all the more, I won’t buy goods
from Azerbaijan now," she said.

"They would profit from my buying their goods.

Besides, there’s the risk factor – you never know what these products
might contain."

Sabuhi Mammadli is a correspondent of the newspaper Yeni Musavat,
Baku. Lusine Musaelian is a correspondent of the newspaper Demo,
Stepanakert.

Naira Melkumian is a correspondent of the news agency Arka, Yerevan

This article is a product of IWPR’s Cross Caucasus Journalism Network
funded by the European Union and other donors. Institute for War and
Peace Reporting’s Caucasus Reporting Service

Levon Aronian To Participate In World Chess Championship Mexico 2007

LEVON ARONIAN TO PARTICIPATE IN WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP MEXICO 2007

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.06.2007 14:14 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian grand master Levon Aronian has won the
right to participate in the World Chess Championship Mexico 2007. On
Tuesday, Aronian played with Alexey Shirov to a draw, gaining a point
with 3,5:2,5 score.

Peter Leko (Hungary), Boris Gelfand (Israel), who beat Yevgeny Bareyev
(Russia) and Gata Kasmky with 3,5:1,5 won a ticket to Mexico as well.

8 grand masters will take part in the Championship.

The names of four of them are already known. These are Vladimir Kramnik
(Russia), Peter Svidler (Russia), Alexander Morozevish (Russia)
and Viswanathan Anand (India), chess-portal.net reports.

Live Wire, Lifeblood: Radio Journalist Tania Ketenjian Enlightens An

LIVE WIRE, LIFEBLOOD: RADIO JOURNALIST TANIA KETENJIAN ENLIGHTENS AND NOURISHES, ONE INTERVIEW AT A TIME
By Lucine Kasbarian

originally published in Hairenik / Armenian Weekly
Art Threat Magazine, Canada

June 13 2007

A financier is provoked to discover himself, his life, and the world
anew when he awakes one morning lost, bewildered and alone, having
contracted retrograde amnesia through the night.

A photo assistant scribbles his phone number on a chalkboard prop
photographed for a "Crate & Barrel" catalog, only to receive 15,000
phone calls from around the country. He organizes a "National Dinner
Tour" to interview his newfound friends and make art from these
encounters.

An "accent elimination course" spurs a New York woman to produce a
sound-art pastiche and social commentary about cultural preservation
and assimilation by trying to acquire her Lebanese-Armenian father’s
and Finnish-Swedish mother’s foreign accents, while they unsuccessfully
try to lose theirs.

In response to rampant shoplifting and gross consumerism, an artist
collective leaves behind hand-crafted objects on grocery shelves
to make political statements known as "shop dropping" and "culture
jamming."

These are some of the eclectic, eccentric, and enigmatic stories heard
on Tania Ketenjian’s provocative programs airing on radio stations
around the country and the globe. Many of her storylines emerge from
the depths of creative expression-from the lives of visual artists,
actors, writers or musicians. Other interviewees are not artists
at all. The common thread throughout is that the voices, ideas
and emotions brought to the airwaves-and facilitated by Tania’s
own discernment, aptitude and finesse-serve to tell stories that
often are not, and to spotlight or question prevailing standards,
preconceptions and realities held and presented in our increasingly
pre-packaged and sanitized world. [More…]

Raised in San Francisco by Lebanese-Armenian parents, Tania’s entry
into radio was not immediate. She moved east to study poetry and
creative writing at Bard College in New York, and later moved to New
York City, where she lived for five years, first designing and editing
for Seven Stories Press-a radical and independent book publisher. Her
genuine interest in people and inherent curiosity about the world
led her to interview authors and artists for City in Exile-a local
arts program on listener-sponsored WBAI Radio in NYC.

Working at WBAI cemented her appetite for radio. And yet, with such
deep ties to family, Tania heeded her mother’s call to return home to
San Francisco, where Tania now lives with her husband Philip Wood, a
British furniture designer and curator and manufacturer of conceptual
art and design objects.

Today, Tania’s radio work takes many forms: As an independent
journalist and producer, her segments can be heard on "Studio 360,"
a quirky arts program nationally syndicated through Public Radio
International; on the popular and nationally syndicated "Weekend
America" on American Public Media; and on National Public Radio’s
"Day to Day." Tania also hosts and produces a weekly arts program
called "Sight Unseen" that airs on KALX in Berkeley, California, and
on Resonance FM in London, England. The program asks interviewees
and listeners to consider how the ideas put forth affect the way
we view the world and ourselves. In addition, she is the West Coast
Correspondent for "WPS1 Art Radio"-established by the Museum of Modern
Art in New York and the world’s first Internet art station.

Her programs also air on stations abroad such as ABC in Australia,
BBC in England, and CBC in Canada.

If this were not enough, Tania is also the co-executive producer
of Thin Air Media, an independently run company producing audio
documentaries. Yet still, Tania teaches audio production at the
California College of the Arts, and also participates in a San
Francisco-based artist’s collective called Quorum. Much like French
journalist Bernard Pivot’s Proustian "Ten Questions," Tania asks us
to consider questions about our common existence-as a participatory
exercise, a starting point of unity, and a springboard for dialogue.

Most recently at an open studios event in which her studio
participated, she asked those gathered to discuss their first encounter
with art.

Though Tania does not consider herself a sound artist, her work
defines her as a portraitist of a different sort. Tania once produced a
program about the love affair between visionary opposites, portrait and
landscape photographer Edward Weston and radical activist-photographer
Tina Modotti. Tania’s own contributions to radio and society seem to
embody both aspects of their natures.

On one hand and like the aesthetically inclined Weston, Tania
explores what life, beauty and essence means to herself and to others
through the subjects she spotlights. On the other hand, and like the
politically motivated Modotti, Tania’s work causes us to think about
how art manifests in social movements, compels us to question and find
meaning in everything, and then act upon those impulses. Perhaps the
most compelling and precise of all descriptions of Tania came from
her former employer, Dan Simon, publisher of Seven Stories Press,
when he called her "hemoglobin," the protein in the human body that
transports oxygen from the lungs to the tissues, and carbon dioxide
from the tissues to the lungs. What hemoglobin does for oxygen and
those who subsist by it is what Tania does for (radio) air and those
who are nourished by it. Indeed, Tania the conduit is as vital a
substance as the life-giving content she transports.

Most recently, Tania and radio partner Ahri Golden, both executive
producers of Thin Air Media, completed a documentary called BIRTH,
a one-hour public radio and audio journey through the practices and
perceptions of birth in this country. BIRTH’s intention is to ask,
"What is the birth experience in America today, and how does it
reflect on our culture?" A companion project in progress, called THE
BIRTH TOUR, is a series of national events that gather people to talk
about birth. Could it be any more fitting that the woman described as
a life-sustaining agent should labor to produce a documentary about
the life-giving process itself?

In a telephone interview, Tania Ketenjian discussed her work, her
ideas, and her Armenian identity.

Lucine Kasbarian: It is an honor to speak with you, Tania. Thank
you for doing what you do, and in the way that you do it. Would you
explain why you do what you do, and how you feel it affects the world
around you?

Tania Ketenjian: Thank you for asking me these questions. I’m so
used to being the questioner, it’s exciting to be on the receiving
end and think about and discuss these things. As a journalist, I
seek to shed light on the fundamental truths of human experience. To
do this, I most often choose to feature art-makers as a force for
change because the creation of art is such a private process, and
yet it is something that is publicly displayed. This contradiction
is fascinating, and I enjoy the intersection of the two. What I
love about art is that something so personal is left to the eyes
and perceptions of the outside world. With the people I interview,
I try to dig deeper, beyond the art, and try to see what their work
reflects about human nature, tendencies, needs, fears. How are these
artists challenged by their work and changed by it? How are they
finding and expressing love or politics through it? Life can be
difficult and being a professional artist is a huge challenge. One
must be so committed to become an artist, and unfortunately it’s rare
to come across people who are passionate about what they do. In this
way, I can come across those people every day. This work inspires me
because I get to be around those who are inspired, who are committed
to doing what they believe in and who want to make some sort of change,
a shift in people’s awareness, an interrupt. Seeing them makes me want
to do the same. And I love people. Just hearing their words and their
insights confirms my belief in the magic of life. I feel blessed and
privileged to have the opportunity to do this. I couldn’t without the
support of my extended family and the opportunities they’ve given me
in life. They sacrificed so that I could have a chance. I also do this
because I feel a lot of people don’t get heard. I try to interview
those who aren’t normally brought on the air. These are people with
beautiful, interesting, powerful things to say. Paradoxical as it may
sound, radio interviews give them the opportunity to be "seen"-and
appreciated for what they do.

If I didn’t become a radio journalist, I think I would have become a
therapist. It’s amazing how much can happen when you are silent. My
Grandpa used to always encourage me to do this, to truly listen. When
someone is being listened to, it’s amazing what will come out of him
or her. In that process, the interviewees have a chance to learn about
themselves, their work, and the change they make in their communities
and environment.

LK: How have your personal politics and views of the world influenced
the stories you’ve sought to cover? You feature Armenian artists now
and then, and the ones you choose appear to be fully in line with your
work, which highlights the seemingly offbeat things that marginalized
people can do. How does your Armenianness affect the stories you cover,
and under what circumstances do you feature Armenians on the air?

TK: It’s inevitable that one interjects his or her views, interests,
and personal experiences into what they’re attracted to-consciously
or unconsciously. The issues that appeal to me often revolve around a
sense of place. I have interviewed a variety of artists that deal with
this-the filmmaker Wim Wenders, Atom Egoyan, artists living in Cuba,
and of course lesser-known names. Sometimes the names we haven’t heard
as often are more original. They aren’t used to being interviewed,
so their answers are unique. Perhaps I gravitate to these people
because of my own background and culture, as well as my own nature. I
have great reverence for family and people that came here not knowing
anything about the culture or language, and yet integrated in a way
that allowed them to be prosperous. The struggle of being an outsider
and yet integrating the self with a new identity and how these lines
cross interests me. I can’t deny my respect for family, familial
closeness, and the collective Armenian sense of determination. We
Armenians are a passionate people. This respect carries over into an
interest I have for all sorts of cultures.

Though I was not forced out of my native land as others were, Atom
Egoyan, in his films Ararat and Calendar, discusses what people adopt,
even if they didn’t experience certain things personally.

Understanding a sense of place allows one to gain a better
understanding of themselves and why they make certain choices, and
hopefully sets the groundwork for a clearer future. This idea is
particularly strong with the Armenians, especially in our Diasporan
culture. These aspects, and a natural curiosity, are all parts of
being a journalist. This is how my Armenian identity shows itself in my
work. And inevitably, my Armenianness does affect the stories I choose
to cover because it’s part of who I am. I am interested in language and
history, in obligation and choice, in conforming and not conforming,
and so much of this comes up in Armenian culture. Because Armenians
have had to remain united, they have had to stick to traditions. It’s
important to question those traditions, and artists are often doing
that. They are in a constant process of questioning.

It’s that process that is of value, not so much the answers you come
up with. I recently became a reporter for "The Armenian Reporter"
newspaper, and I am now immersed in the ways Armenians are exploring
identity and history. This gives me yet another avenue in which to
express what I encounter among the Armenians.

LK: What is it about the Armenian culture that makes you feel you
grew up with a strong Armenian identity?

TK: First and foremost, the language. And it’s not just the spoken
word and how that is different from English, but its intonations
and even idiomatic phrases that have affected me. I become another
person when I speak a different language, at least another part of
who I am already. I think that’s very true about those who speak
several languages, it calls upon a different voice, way of thinking,
connection. There are so many small things that are reminders-it’s
all-pervasive in a strangely innocuous way. Phone calls from Lebanon
were a staple as I was growing up. Picking up my grandparents from the
international arrivals section of the airport was always an interesting
experience. Smells, food, and of course, certain codes of manners and
politeness we practiced, right down to how we’d stand by the curb when
company drove away, or how my Mom opened her eyes wide when I’d say
something inappropriate. But having said all this, I didn’t grow up
going to church or belonging to Armenian organizations. I can’t make
sweeping generalizations, but Armenians can have a particular way of
viewing the world and notions about how one should be. It’s like I was
saying before, it’s one of the perils of tradition. We are expected to
choose practical professions and remain bonded to family and sometimes
this can be difficult for Armenians, and for Armenian creatives, in
particular. I find that a lot of Armenians can feel alienated because
of the choices they’ve made in their lives. There’s a warmth and a
joviality that I find in Armenian culture and at the same time there’s
a slight rigidity and that can easily be eradicated. It’s about sharing
ideas and coming together in an authentic way that simultaneously
speaks to both one’s Armenian identity and personal endeavor. My
Armenianess is a contradiction, I hold true to certain values but
in some ways I have picked an unconventional profession. However,
the values that I have make that profession possible. I think that’s
often overlooked in Armenian culture, image becomes more important
than intention. That’s something that I think we can be more aware of.

LK: Regarding how Armenian creatives can feel like outsiders or
outcasts within our Diasporan communities for holding unconventional
views or lifestyles, how might the Armenian community better embrace
or welcome Armenian creatives? Is there a way for such marginalization
to be turned into an asset?

TK: Firstly, most people in the world feel marginalized. They do not
feel connected or represented, and that’s why people join groups or
create clear identities for themselves, so that they can feel less
alone. The good thing about being slightly alienated is that it offers
you a chance to observe and expose things in a way that you couldn’t
if you were on the inside. Marginalization allows you to see in a
deeper way. You are already marginalized, so what have you got to
lose? Artists are often marginalized so through their work they can
be blunt and take risks. Hopefully a marginalized person’s attitudes,
views and beliefs will resonate with others, and then like-minded
people can meet, join in, create community and grow together. Also,
when you are marginalized, you have to understand yourself better
because the environment that you exist in does not reflect back to
you who you are. That level of self-awareness will hopefully increase
the value of what you are putting out into the world in a conscious
way. And being marginalized goes hand in hand with taking risks. And
risk is a great way to accomplish your dreams.

Filmmaker Atom Egoyan holds values that may be considered traditionally
Armenian and yet, in his work, he doesn’t hide the darker side of the
human experience, whether it is about love, loss, passion, identity,
falsehoods or truths. That’s risky and it’s real.

The whole point of journalism is to communicate, connect, to talk
about the things that most people don’t (even if they think it),
and then to grow. That’s why communication is so important; it’s
the greatest stepping-stone to change. These are some of the
assets of marginalization but I think it can be very difficult
for Armenian creatives. There are many misconceptions out there:
[that] creatives are non-traditionals, not hard working, and maybe
even not very moral, and all of these are inaccurate. What would be
ideal would be for there to be a place or more places for Armenian
creativity to shine, for Armenian creatives to come together, whether
they are visual artists, musicians or filmmakers. They are out there,
making documentaries, music, books, expressing themselves through and
through. If these communities came together across America and the
world for that matter, they could be stronger as one group and they
could feel recognized and they could be heard. It is the change that
happens when someone expresses what they believe in and then follows
it through that is profound. Some of the most important people in
history who have instigated change worked against the grain and it
is those whom we remember now. So it’s important to value difference
and to bring that to the surface so that we can learn from it.

LK: Why haven’t these sorts of groups formed, in your opinion?

TK: I think we often hope someone else will do it! And Armenians
aren’t the only ones who have this tendency. Life gets busy.

Organizing is time-consuming. Sometimes we doubt ourselves and we
think, who will care. This sort of work and commitment needs to be
a priority in life, and that’s an enormous investment. Armenians
are inherently welcoming people and as a community, we want what’s
best for our people. I think such artist cells or organizations,
once formed, would thrive amongst our own.

LK: Speaking of journalists talking about elephants in the room,
how serious are competitive jealousies among Armenians and Armenian
creatives, and how can Armenians-creatives or not-cope with this?

TK: Competition is such an unhealthy characteristic, in my opinion,
and I say this as a very competitive backgammon player! Sharing
and learning, on the other hand, is a community act. It is better
to learn from each other and help one another than to compete. I’ve
learned a lot from my mother’s example on this point. She’s a strong
Armenian woman, a lawyer, a professor, a writer, a broker and she’s
not competitive at all! She has modeled for me that you can move
forward in life and pursue your dreams from a place of passion and
belief. She has shown me that accomplishment and competitiveness
don’t have to go hand in hand. Her life has been about doing what’s
better for someone else. Ultimately, we want to be inspired by the
people around us. We all have something that we do better than others,
just as others possess something they can do better than we do. In my
opinion, the cure for competition is solidarity. We are all in this
together. It’s not about each one for him- or herself. It’s about
everything for the betterment of all-whether we’re talking family,
community, or the world-at-large.

LK: Your website describes how institutions and individuals can
purchase the "BIRTH" documentary and "BIRTH in the classroom," a
companion program that introduces students to the birthing process-from
conception all the way to delivery. How can the Armenian community
support you?

TK: Supporting "BIRTH in the Classroom" would be extraordinary. It’s
unconventional, and I’d be curious to see how the Armenian community
reacts to it. However, the kind of support from Armenians that I’d
welcome would be their belief in me…that I could help represent
them in a way that would make a positive impact in their lives and
the lives of others. I would be nourished and touched by that. At
the end of my career, I would be gratified if interviewees felt that
their stories were told in a way they would want them to be told.

When all is said and done, we journalists enter people’s homes and talk
of things that have great meaning for them. I’m honored that these
people place their trust in me and believe that their words won’t be
manipulated. Journalism is a lot like psychology. We ask questions,
we do lots of listening, we learn a lot about the personal lives
of others. Time and again, the interviews strengthen my belief in
humanity and that there are people out there supporting each other
and hoping to make a change in their environment. So to support me,
I’d say, "Approach me with your stories." The best I can do is give
people the opportunity to express themselves and to be a conduit for
their stories to be told.

LK: How do you think art can be "political?"

TK: Art is an exchange between viewer and creator. Its effect is in
that communication, and that communication is constantly evolving. So
firstly, art can only be political when the observer is willing
to look at a piece through that lens. Contemporary art has a huge
political bent, almost at the risk of abnegating beauty. There can be
value in this because it increases awareness, engages discussion and
has the ultimate affect of changing perspective. At the same time,
I find that work such as landscapes or fiction, seemingly more
traditional work that doesn’t have an overt political statement,
is sometimes the most political. It offers a moment of reflection,
of quiet, of solitary experience between a work of art and yourself.

That can be very political. It also depends on the definition of
political and what political means for you. Art is a private expression
in a very public sphere and that in and of itself is political. The
most important thing however is to be authentic–regardless of your
views and the exact way you choose to express them. As long as you’re
true to what you believe, then some message will come across.

LK: What would your dream assignment be?

TK: I could say interviewing the leading artists of the world,
or being sent to an exotic location to cover a story, but that’s
not the case. The quirky stories are my bread and butter, but the
stories that touch on universal themes are my dream assignments. When
I returned to California from New York, I took a three-month-long road
trip and interviewed people along the way. At the time, there were
lots of people complaining about not being happy, and psychoactive
pharmaceutical drugs seemed to be manufacturing happiness in America.

In light of this, I wanted to ask everyday people what the pursuit
of happiness was all about. Was it about chasing a dream? Did they
already have it? I asked people to name five things that made them
happy, and what their definition of happiness was. I hoped this segment
would allow interviewees and listeners to think about the question and
their own notions of happiness. One woman said, "To see, hear, taste,
smell, and touch." As it turned out, this woman was expected to die
of a fatal illness six months prior, but miraculously didn’t. Since
then, every day for her has been a gift. Her outlook and reply put
so much into perspective. But ultimately, it’s very difficult to
say what a dream assignment would be. I don’t think I’ll recognize
a dream assignment until it’s right in front of me.

Sometimes you’re shooting for one story and some other magical thing
happens from it. I have interviewed famous people, which would seem
like a dream, and have been disappointed and then I have spoken to
lay people who changed my way of seeing. Much like life, you never
know what you’re going to find. So I could try and say what my dream
assignment would be, but it is most likely inaccurate. Every assignment
has the potential to be a dream assignment. It all depends on what
you make of it.

LK: What are your plans for the future?

TK: There are lots of projects coming up in the future, but there’s
one that I am really excited about. I just received a grant from an
arts organization to produce an "audio quilt" that gathers stories
about the Armenian Genocide. I encourage Armenians, whether they
are genocide survivors or descendants, to contact me with their
narratives. I would like to capture this fading history and explore
the ways in which it affects where we are today.

To learn more about Tania Ketenjian and her work, visit
and

Tania Ketenjian may be contacted at Tania At radiotania.org

Lucine Kasbarian is an Armenian-American writer, editor, political
cartoonist, and author of "Armenia: A Rugged Land, an Enduring People"
(Simon & Schuster). She is also a contributor to "The Armenian Weekly"
newspaper (), where this article first appeared.

http://www.artthreat.net/2007/06/268
www.radiotania.org
www.thinairmedia.org.
www.armenianweekly.com

Military Force As An Effective Means Of Conflict Resolution

MILITARY FORCE AS AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION
by Dilrook Kannangara

Lankaweb, Sri Lanka
June 13 2007

In a hypocritical display of utter ignorance Kim Howells of Britain
has howled about the Sri Lankan conflict. All this nonsense is to grab
a few votes at the forthcoming election after blunders in the middle
east have tarnished the Labour government. He may have forgotten
the War on Terror. He has claimed that no conflict has been won by
force! What a big fat lie?

If force cannot resolve conflicts, what the love-making British
soldiers are doing in Afghanistan? What did they do in Iraq apart
from sexual abuses? In fact, most conflicts were resolved by force
and not by negotiations.

1. The symbol of rebellion is Che Guevara across the world. But when
he started his ‘rebellion’ with his ‘rebels’ against the Bolivian
government, the government forces used brutal power to crush the
struggle. It was put down with such ferocity that no one dared to
identify themselves with the ‘rebels’ and the conflict ended. What
more symbolic evidence is needed to prove the point?

2. Argentina claimed that Falkland Islands as its territory and
Britain knowing the worth of black gold treasures therein launched
a ruthless war and the conflict ended when the Brits substantially
beat the Argentines into submission.

3. Foreign imperial forces invaded Vietnam in the name of ‘democracy’;
naturally the North Vietnamese army fought back. What a war it was
which was won and peace dawned on not only North Vietnam but on the
whole nation.

4. That’s not all; they declared war on the Khmer regime of Cambodia
to stop the genocide and after a short battle won the freedom for
Cambodians.

5. For many years, terrorists in Malaysia fought and Dr Mahathir
Mohammad said enough is enough and defied all foreign advice and
threats to unleash a brutal campaign of war that brought peace and
prosperity to that country. Not even Gorge Soros could take it away
from them!

6. Israel was under siege from a large number of neighbouring states
and had to fight for its survival. And that’s exactly what they
did and built the fourth powerful nation on earth in terms of its
nuclear arsenal.

7. Rwanda was plagued by some of the minority Tutsis keeping the
majority Hutus under tyranny until the majority decided to fight
back. Within weeks, the oppressors were genocided and today Rwanda
is a peaceful and a fast developing country.

8. Turkey was under a similar tyranny from a few Armenians. In
a brutal assault not seen anywhere else since, the Turks put down
their oppressors. Since then Turkey has become a very prosperous and
a peace loving state that rejects Islamic fundamentalism on all counts.

9. In 2004, the most devastating tsunami hit Banda Acheh province in
Indonesia. Acheh rebels were devastated. The government immediately
spun into action by shrewdly clamping down on the terrorists and
selective aid distribution that lead the separatists to die a natural
death. Force of nature and military force did the needful. An Army
General at the helm also helped.

10. In 1988, LTTE terrorists ran havoc in Maldives islands causing
vandalism. Supported by the Indians forces, the Maldivian government
violently put down the attempted capture. Until this date, the
Maldivians enjoy their freedom from terrorism.

11. Chechnyan terrorists threatened Russia with utter destruction
for which the Russians responded in real grand style that crushed
the rebellion.

12. On July 7th 2005, London was bombed by educated and well off
youths in the name of Jihad. Swift action by the British police
clamped down heavily on troublesome elements. No negotiations were
held with the terrorists.

13. Same happened in the US in 2001, Spain in 2004 and India in 2006.

No negotiated settlements were attempted and sheer force was used to
crush the terror elements.

14. A megalomaniac (a more reasonable one than LTTE’s Parabakaran)
named Hitler was engaging in mass killing of civilians. No negotiations
were held to resolve the issue. Instead, brutal force from all sides
stopped the dictator in his tracks.

15. At the same time Japan was also engaged in violence and was halted
when utter destruction was caused on Japan by the US forces.

An undeniable piece of evidence of how sheer force can resolve
conflicts.

The list continues.

There are other instances where negotiations were used with the aim
of settling conflicts. They have a different outcome; in fact no
outcome at all and negotiations have prolonged those conflicts!!

Israel-Palestine – a conflict of no end in sight and every year there
are negotiations!

Internal conflicts in Palestine, Lebanon, Algeria, Nigeria, Sudan,
etc. where many foreign nations are involved in dialogue, negotiations,
peace talks, ceasefire agreements, peace roadmaps and other
nonsense. These conflicts continue and they provide enough business
for aid agencies, NGOs, religious missions and other interferers.

Repeated rounds of negotiations were held with North Korea and Iran;
they continue to pursue their nuclear dream. They even threaten to
wipe out other countries from the face of the world. Once developed,
their nuclear arsenal can surely do it.

Hopeless negotiations are held between the Sri Lankan government and
the LTTE terrorists; nobody believes in them as repeatedly it has been
proved by the LTTE that they want part of the nation and would not
settle for less. Periods of negotiations were used by the terrorists to
rearm themselves and during a round of peace talks the terrorists have
actually gone shopping for weapons! The conflict continues, naturally.

Negotiations regarding Northern Ireland has not achieved anything
for the ‘Real IRA’ that is still fighting and still is branded as a
terrorist organisation. Religious intolerance and killings continue
in Ireland.

This list also continues.

Negotiations have only prolonged conflicts and have given legitimacy
to terrorists, rebels, insurgents, imperialists, colonialists, human
rights missions, Christian missions, NGO businesses, mediators,
facilitators and other interferers.

Britain has no ‘loving’ right to tell Sri Lanka to solve the conflict
by means that the Brits see as appropriate. After all, they are
part of the problem. Had the 10% Tamil speaking upcountry Tamil
population were not brought to Sri Lanka, we would not have such a
complex problem today. Instead of Tamils, if it were Africans, still
we would not have any problem. The deliberate attempt to forcibly
balance the races by brining in slaves dumped on the island extremely
complex problems. In old days when no such population lived here,
similar problems were resolved with much ease.

Howells’ request is one sided as it only directed to Sri Lanka.

Obviously, there are two sides to any conflict and the LTTE was
conveniently forgotten. Ethnic cleansing and human rights violations
of the LTTE go unpunished. To make things worse, British residents
remain a major financier of bombs, guns, mortars and suicide kits
for the LTTE.

If Britains main concern is human rights violations, that doesn’t
give it any right to ask SL to scrap the war all together. Instead,
what it should do is to provide SL with advanced equipment capable
of detecting and defeating terror attacks.

However, the Sri Lankan government also needs to be blamed for its
lethargic and inefficient military campaign. Another three years of
warfare cannot be sustained by the fragile economy, dispirited people,
overstretched manpower requirements on the armed forces and by the
fighter jets that only have a remaining useful life of two years! At
this rate of war, it will continue for the foreseeable future.

What needs is to fight the war with the end in mind and sight. If
the LTTE has a manpower strength of 20,000 regular and ancillary
fighting cadre, this 20,000 should be killed at a faster rate than
they can recruit keeping in mind their recruitment age of four years
and above. As long as we fall short of this target, we are prolonging
the war and we can never enjoy what Malaysia, Rwanda, Bolivia or
Turkey enjoys. However, the worst thing is to get advice from the
perpetrators of the crime. We also need to team up with countries
that are willing to help us. It should be projected to any potential
invader that any undue interference with our affairs will lead to
Iraq type of violence in Sri Lanka.

In addition, the foreign governments should understand that the
war was not started by the government of Sri Lanka. Security forces
are merely taking the brunt of the terrorists lest the public would
get affected. They are fighting so that the general public need not
fight against each other and hence all help should be given to the
war on terror.

Before offering free advice, Britain should resolve its own conflicts
with insurgents, rebels, terrorists, prisoners and the people in
Afghanistan and Iraq. Humiliating defeats there and public anger
and curses of the Muslim world cannot be buried in shallow graves;
Britain has caused enough havoc in Sri Lanka and should at least now
mind its own bloody business in Afghanistan, Iraq and at home.

Disclaimer All views and opinions presented in this article are
solely those of the surfer and do not necessarily represent those
of LankaWeb.com.

7/130607-3.html

http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items0

Trail Of Blood

TRAIL OF BLOOD

Brussels Journal, Belgium

J une 13 2007

>From the desk of Fjordman on Tue, 2007-06-12 23:17

Muslim leaders have robustly criticized a forthright "position papier"
[issued by the Lutheran churches in Germany]. Ayyub Axel Koehler,
chairman of the Council of Muslims, [a German who converted to Islam
in 1963] told the church-people that Europe should be ashamed of
the "trail of blood" that it had left throughout the world down
the centuries.

Comment from Fjordman: It would be interesting to see Muslims deal
with the trail of blood they have left behind on several continents,
from Thailand via India to Armenia, during more than 1300 years. To
quote Paul Fregosi’s book Jihad in the West:

"The Jihad, the Islamic so-called Holy War, has been a fact of life in
Europe, Asia, Africa and the Near and Middle East for more than 1300
years, but this is the first history of the Muslim wars in Europe
ever to be published. Hundreds of books, however, have appeared on
its Christian counterpart, the Crusades, to which the Jihad is often
compared, although they lasted less than two hundred years and unlike
the Jihad, which is universal, were largely but not completely confined
to the Holy Land. Moreover, the Crusades have been over for more than
700 years, while a Jihad is still going on in the world. The Jihad has
been the most unrecorded and disregarded major event of history. It
has, in fact, been largely ignored. For instance, the Encyclopaedia
Britannica gives the Crusades eighty times more space than the Jihad."

"Western colonization of nearby Muslim lands lasted 130 years, from
the 1830s to the 1960s. Muslim colonization of nearby European lands
lasted 1300 years, from the 600s to the mid-1960s. Yet, strangely,
it is the Muslims, the Arabs and the Moors to be precise, who are the
most bitter about colonialism and the humiliations to which they have
been subjected; and it is the Europeans who harbor the shame and the
guilt. It should be the other way around."

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2185

UN Stands For Peaceful Resolution Of The Karabakh Conflict

UN STANDS FOR PEACEFUL RESOLUTION OF THE KARABAKH CONFLICT

ArmRadio.am
12.06.2007 15:00

Deputy Resident Representative of the UN Development Programme
in Azerbaijan Bruno Pueza told the journalists in Baku that "the
United Nations Organizations stands for the peaceful resolution of
the Karabakh conflict." "The UN sees the resolution of this conflict
exceptionally through peace talks and assists the conflicting countries
along this way," he said.

Pueza noted that the negotiations between the Presidents of Armenia
and Azerbaijan on the sidelines of the unofficial summit of CIS
Presidnets in Saint Petersburg "was another step on the way of the
peaceful resolution of the conflict, and we are positive about the
continuation of talks."

Armenia Constitutional Court Votes Down Opposition Appeal

ARMENIA CONSTITUTIONAL COURT VOTES DOWN OPPOSITION APPEAL

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
June 10, 2007 Sunday 08:17 PM EST

The Armenian Constitutional Court voted down an appeal filed by the
opposition demanding to recognize invalid the returns of the May
12 parliamentary elections in the republic. Constitutional Court
Chairman Gagik Arutyunyan said in the Sunday court ruling that the
election returns, which the Central Election Committee approved,
are left in force. The ruling passed by the Constitutional Court is
final and cannot be repealed.

The Constitutional Court ruled that some violations and inaccuracies
were committed during the parliamentary elections, but they could
affect greatly the final returns. The Central Election Committee will
submit for investigation in the Armenian Prosecutor General’s Office
reports about these violations, which were committed in 60 out of
1,923 polling stations.

The number of violations during the latest voting reduced as compared
with the previous elections, and the turnout was higher, particularly
among young people. The Constitutional Court focused attention on a
low training level of members of election committees, as well as on
cases, when voters were not informed about the date of elections.

The Constitutional Court has tried an appeal of four opposition
parties since June 1. They appealed against the returns of the recent
parliamentary elections in the republic. The opposition parties
"Republic", "New Times", "Orinats Erkir" (Country of the Law) and the
election bloc "Impeachment" offered to recognize invalid the results of
the elections in the National Assembly of Armenia, deputy chairman of
the court Volodya Oganesyan emphasized. They attached to their appeal
7,000 pages of materials, in which they cited examples of bribery
during the election campaign, violations of the canvassing rules.

The opposition claims that during the election campaign and on the
voting day several parties exerted strong influence on voters. The
oppositionists affirmed that not all parties had equal conditions
during the election campaign on TV, and the ruling party had some
advantages.

International observers assessed highly the parliamentary elections
in Armenia.

OSCE Chairman-in-Office and Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel
Moratinos, who visited Armenia on June 4, congratulated the Armenian
people on very successful parliamentary elections, which were assessed
positively in the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in
Europe. He believes that these successful elections will contribute
to the development and consolidation of the democratic process in
Armenia. Moratinos expressed confidence that the presidential elections
due in Armenia next year will be held in the same positive way.

Washington Won’t Agree On Vladimir Putin’s Proposal On Gabala Radar

WASHINGTON WON’T AGREE ON VLADIMIR PUTIN’S PROPOSAL ON GABALA RADAR STATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.06.2007 15:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Vladimir Putin’s proposal to share the use of
the Gabala radar station was just a "lie detector" for George
W. Bush. Naturally, the United States will not agree on that
offer, since that station covers nearly the whole world except
for the territory of the former USSR," political scientist Levon
Melik-Shahnazaryan stated to a press conference in Yerevan. In his
opinion, the United States needs control over the Russian territory.

At the G8 summit in Heiligendamm Russian President Vladimir Putin
offered the U.S. to share the use of the Gabala radar station.

No Breakthrough Reached At Aliyev-Kocharian Meeting In St. Petersbur

NO BREAKTHROUGH REACHED AT ALIYEV-KOCHARIAN MEETING IN ST. PETERSBURG – MAMEDYAROV

Interfax, Russia
June 11 2007

BAKU. June 11 (Interfax) – No breakthrough was reached at a meeting of
Azerbaijani President Ilkham Aliyev with Armenian President Robert
Kocharian in St. Petersburg, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mamedyarov said.

"The Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents talked about the issues at
the latest meeting assuming the earlier discussed elements; however,
I cannot say that a breakthrough was secured," the minister told
journalist on Monday.

"However, every meeting is another possibility to clearly understand
the position of the other party. The fact that the meeting lasted
three hours proves that it was intense. Many issues were discussed.

In general, these are basic settlement principles," the minister said.

The talks were held within the framework of the Prague process,
the minister said. This means that a gradual settlement should
be guaranteed, according to which Armenian forces in the occupied
territories should be replaced with peacekeepers, forced migrants
should return, and then the Nagorno-Karabakh status issue should be
solved, he said.

Talks will continue; however, co-chairmen of the Minsk Group asked
for some time to study the situation, Mamedyarov said, adding: "One
knows the direction of further talks, but some nuances are possible."

Do workers of Mill get salary in time?

Do workers of Mill get salary in time?

11-06-2007 14:31:01 – KarabakhOpen

The workers of the Mill owned by Movses Sahakyan have not got their
salaries since September. Recently the government has announced to
allocate funds for paying the salary debts of the company which has
been put up to sale. The Mill Company was set up with the assistance of
the ex-minister of defense Samvel Babayan in 1996. It is the only
elevator in Karabakh. After the conflict between the ex-defense
minister and the president of NKR a group of representatives of the ARF
Dashnaktsutyun abroad owned the mill and the bread factory of
Stepanakert, who had supported the president. Soon, however, most
owners sold their stocks, and Movses Sahakyan who had a small
percentage of stock became the owner of both companies.
Apparently, the companies were not run in accordance with the rules of
economy. In particular, the stockholders made investments but drew
dividends from small profit. The management was also poor, and now the
former CEO of the bread factory is detained. One way or another, about
80 workers of the mill have not been paid for many months now.
Arthur Arzumanyan, the new CEO of the bread factory told us the workers
got the salaries for the past two months. The managers are going to pay
for May.