EU Presidency welcomes Turkish President’s visit to Yerevan

EU Presidency welcomes Turkish President’s visit to Yerevan

armradio.am
06.09.2008 12:55

The Presidency of the European Union welcomes the invitation of the
President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, to his Turkish counterpart,
Abdullah Gul, to attend the qualifying match between the national teams
of Armenia and Turkey in Yerevan on September 6.

We also welcome President Gul’s decision to accept the invitation. This
visit is a serious sign of encouraging the relations between Armenia
and Turkey.

The Presidency hopes that this historic and extremely symbolic visit
will create a favorable atmosphere for the normalization of relations
between the two countries, which we are waiting for.

Old Foes Armenia And Turkey Put Faith In Football =?unknown?q?Diplom

OLD FOES ARMENIA AND TURKEY PUT FAITH IN FOOTBALL DIPLOMACY

The Guardian
Friday September 5 2008

Presidents to hold talks before World Cup qualifier

· Neighbours at odds over first world war ‘genocide ‘Robert Tait
in Istanbul

The first tentative steps towards healing generations of bitterness
between Turkey and Armenia will take place in a football stadium in
Yerevan tomorrow when the two nations meet in a World Cup qualifier
watched by their respective presidents.

In what has been termed "football diplomacy", Turkey’s president,
Abdullah Gul, will attend the match after accepting an invitation from
his Armenian counterpart, Serge Sarkisian, in an attempt to kick-start
relations between the two neighbours, who do not have diplomatic ties.

An estimated 5,000 Turkish fans are also expected in Yerevan, Armenia’s
capital, after the Armenian authorities waived normal visas controls
for the match in a goodwill gesture.

The presence of a large travelling army of supporters has provoked
fears of violent clashes with Armenian nationalists, who have vowed
to demonstrate against Gul’s visit, the first to Armenia by a modern
Turkish head of state.

In a sign of the political sensitivity, Gul only confirmed on Wednesday
evening that he would make the trip, ending speculation that had been
growing since the invitation was sent in July.

A carefully worded statement from his office said that the occasion had
"meaning beyon d being just a sporting event". It added: "The visit
held in the context of a match will contribute to the creation of a
climate of friendship in the region. The match will be an opportunity
to overcome obstacles and prepare a new ground to bring the two
people together."

The presidents are expected to watch side-by-side after discussions on
a catalogue of issues that evoke emotion, mistrust and vast differences
in perception.

Ankara and Yerevan have long been at odds over Turkey’s refusal to
accept as genocide the deaths of up to 1.5 million Armenians at the
hands of Ottoman troops during the first world war. Turkey insists that
far fewer died, and that many of the deaths were caused by starvation
and disease, but proposes establishing a joint historical commission
to examine the issue.

Despite that longstanding disagreement, Turkey was among the first
countries to recognise Armenia’s independence following the collapse
of the Soviet Union in 1991. But formal relations were subsequently
frozen when Armenia occupied the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region
following a war with Azerbaijan, Turkey’s close ally. Turkey also
resents Armenian territorial claims on its eastern borders.

The troubled backdrop drove opposition politicians to urge Gul not
to accept the invitation, with Deniz Baykal, leader of Turkey’s
oldest party, the Republican People’s party – founded by Ataturk,
declaring that he would rather watch the game in20Baku, Azerbaijan’s
capital. Devlet Bahceli, leader of the Nationalist Action party, said
the president "should not go before the problems between Armenia and
Turkey are solved".

Plans for a parliamentary delegation from the ruling Justice and
Development party (AKP) to accompany Gul were scrapped amid fears of
the trip becoming submerged in party politics.

However, the government supports rapprochement with Armenia as part of
prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s proposal for a Caucasus stability
pact, promoted by Turkey following the recent clash between Russia and
Georgia. It is also keen to prevent the genocide issue clouding future
relations with the US and the EU, which have both given favourable
hearings to arguments presented by Armenian diaspora groups.

Mensur Akgun, foreign policy programme director of Tesev, a Turkish
thinktank, said the visit could lead to an accord on the question,
thus improving international perceptions of Turkey. "There may be some
progress on the joint commission to see if it was really genocide under
the 1948 UN definition, meaning we will be able to face our own history
which is obviously really good for a democracy," he said. "With respect
to Turkey’s international relations there is a lot to be gained."

Alexander Iskandarian, director of the Caucasus Institute in Yerevan,
said normalised relations with Turkey would provide Armenia with a
direct pathway to Europe, which the landlocked country lacks. "At the
moment we have open borders with just two of our neighbours, Georgia
and Iran," he said. "It costs us the same to import 1kg of goods from
Europe as it does from Australia, yet most of our trade is with Europe.

Open borders with Turkey would be very important to us."

Backstory The opening for the thaw in relations came when Turkey and
Armenia were drawn in the same World Cup qualifying group. It will
be the first time they have met at a senior level. President Serge
Sarkisian of Armenia saw it as a chance for "football diplomacy"
based on "ping-pong diplomacy", when the restoration of US-Chinese
ties in 1972 was presaged by table tennis matches.

"Just as the people of China and the United States shared enthusiasm
for ping-pong … the people of Armenia and Turkey are united in their
love of football," he wrote in the Wall Street Journal. "Whatever
our differences, there are certain cultural, humanitarian and sports
links that our people share, even with a closed border."

Amid fears of clashes between fans, Turkey’s coach, Fetih Terim,
called for calm, saying: "This is only a football game not a war. We
cannot carry the weight of history on our shoulders."

–Boundary_(ID_K1tqCUExzjHV+w+xq Nk0LQ)–

Opinion: Improvement Of Armenia-Turkey Relations By End Of Year Unli

OPINION: IMPROVEMENT OF ARMENIA-TURKEY RELATIONS BY END OF YEAR UNLIKELY

ARKA
Sep 4, 2008

YEREVAN, September 4. /ARKA/. Serious changes in Armenian-Turkish
relations by the end of this year are improbable, Armenian political
scientist Sergey Shakaryants said.

No diplomatic relations exist between Armenia and Turkey, and the
Armenian-Turkish border has been closed since 1993 initiated by
official Ankara.

Official Yerevan says it is ready to establish relations with
Turkey without any preconditions. But Turkey puts preconditions for
establishing bilateral relations, particularly requests Armenia to give
up the policy of international recognition of the Armenian genocide
of 1915 when about one and a half million Armenians were slaughtered.

Opening of the borders between the two countries is impossible,
Shakaryants said.

As to the forthcoming visit of Turkish President Giul to Yerevan
for watching Armenia-Turkey FIFA qualifier, the political scientist
pointed out that any contact between the two countries is a positive
change itself.

But one should not expect too much, bearing in mind the background
against which the first meeting of the presidents is to be held,
the political scientist said.

The leaders may exchange views on a number of issues, but this does
not mean that other meetings or attempts to solve problems through
close cooperation will follow, said Shakaryants.

ANKARA: Turkey Confirms President To Visit Armenia 6 Sep

TURKEY CONFIRMS PRESIDENT TO VISIT ARMENIA 6 SEP

Anatolia news agency
Sept 3 2008
Turkey

["TURKISH PRESIDENT ACCEPTS INVITATION OF ARMENIAN PRESIDENT" –
AA headline]

ANKARA (A.A) -Turkish President Abdullah Gul accepted Armenian
President Serzh Sargsian’s invitation to watch together the 2010
World Cup qualifying round game that would be played between Turkey
and Armenia in Yerevan on September 6th, the Presidential Press Centre
said on Wednesday.

A statement released by the centre said Sargsian invited President
Gul to Yerevan for the World Cup qualifying match between the two
countries.

Important developments which concerned especially the people in
Caucasus have taken place in the recent period and opportunities
which came out in this period should not be missed, the statement said.

"Such a visit can contribute to a brand new friendly atmosphere in
the region," it stated.

Book Review: One Tragedy Of Many – "My Grandmother"

ONE TRAGEDY OF MANY – "MY GRANDMOTHER"
by Nouritza Matossian

New Statesman
9/fethiye-cetin-grandmother
Sept 4 2008
UK

THE BOOK My Grandmother: a Memoir Fethiye Cetin, translated and
introduced by Maureen Freely Verso, 144pp, £12.99

Fethiye Cetin’s granny: a modern Mother Courage My Grandmother
is an innocent little book, easy to overlook, except for the tiny
headscarved woman whose eyes burn with accusation on the cover: an
oriental Mother Courage. Its hundred-odd pages are to be read at one
sitting – and, once read, never to be forgotten. Brevity and shape
add to its authority. But who is this author, whom most people have
never heard of in Europe?

Fethiye Cetin has herself become a Mother Courage in the Turkish legal
system. She is the lawyer prosecuting the murderers of Hrant Dink,
the Armenian Turkish editor gunned down in broad daylight outside his
office last year. She also defended Dink when he was alive against
the preposterous Article 301, for "insulting Turkish identity". Dink
published an ad for her lost relatives in his paper Agos that brought
back an answer from the US, and so her perilous journey began.

In her memoir, Fethiye grows up a fully integrated Turkish Muslim
schoolgirl, reciting nationalistic poems at the top of her voice
and never doubting her origins. On Fethiye’s father’s early death,
Grandmother Seher takes her widowed daughter and three grandchildren
under her wing. The illiterate grandmother expertly manages the
extended family and a feckless husband, and sensitises Fethiye deeply
with her kindness, industry and sense of rightness.

As she nears death, it is to Fethiye that she confesses her lifelong
secret. She belongs to a people who are supposed not to exist in
Turkey. They have no voice, no name, no history. Close to two million
have been uprooted, driven from their homes and lands, forced to
march across wasteland, tortured, raped and killed. The sheer numbers
of their corpses thrown in rivers changed the course of the waters,
which ran red with blood. In one, Grandmother saw children’s heads
bobbing out of the water only to be pushed under to drown by their
own mother, to prevent them from suffering an agonising death. She
herself is plucked from her mother’s arms by a Turkish soldier,
adopted and later married off to a Turk, Fethiye’s grandfather.

In 1915, the Ottoman government and the Young Turks enforced the state
policy of total extermination. Yet, 90 years later, this mass murder
could not be mentioned without attracting the risk of punishment by
law, hence the delay in producing studies, memoirs and novels on the
subject of the Armenian genocide. The Jewish Holocaust, two decades
later, far outstripped it in commanding world attention with lawsuits,
a huge literature bearing out Hitler’s gibe: "Who today remembers
the Armenians?"

As Maureen Freely, the gifted translator of this narrative, writes
in her introduction, Ataturk applied his cauterised official history
to hide historical crimes. A triumphalist nationalist myth poisoned
generations of schoolchildren with a distorted history and ignorance
of their own neighbours – the Armenians, whose lands and property had
been stolen. They were callously taught that it was Armenians who
had massacred Turks, therefore "Armenian" must be the arch-enemy,
a dirty word. So, these people remained nameless, that is to say,
the survivors were given Turkish names and the Muslim religion,
and brutally assimilated as "leftovers from the sword".

This book answers a question I have often pondered: "What happened
to the young women, children and babies who were left behind in
a Muslim society that could not tolerate their religion?" I, too,
had a great-aunt who was abducted on the death march and years later
was seen with blue tattoos on her face in an Aleppo market. Cetin
intercuts her own childhood and adult quest with her grandmother’s
words spoken on her deathbed. She has a keen eye for tragedy and
humour. Her family’s provincial life has robust simplicity, charm
and a blood-curdling coolness. Courageously she tackles the greatest
taboo in Turkey. There are no accusations, no generalisations, yet
she registers her inner turmoil. Finally, at the Muslim funeral rites,
she yells out her grandmother’s real Armenian name, Gadaryan, to the
astonished mourners.

Most harrowing is how the old woman’s pent-up craving for her lost
Armenian family, which she knows to be alive, a craving cruelly
sabotaged by the Turkish family she selflessly nurtured, bursts out
of her at the last. How amazed she would be to see her own picture
on the cover of a bestselling book.

Jews, Kurds, Laz, Alevis – today’s Turkey is filled with people of
mixed race who rediscover themselves in Cetin’s Mother Courage and
hurry to her to confess behind closed doors. Dink once said to me,
"Who do you think is buying all these hundreds of books? We have
over two million hidden Armenians here." As the funeral placards
paraded by more than 100,000 Turks read, "We are all Hrant Dink. We
are all Armenian." Turkey’s disenfranchised people are awakening the
conscience of the country to face the truth.

Nouritza Matossian is the author of "Black Angel: a Life of Arshile
Gorky" (Chatto & Windus) and director of the documentary "Heart of
Two Nations: Hrant Dink"

–Boundary_(ID_CIfxarhL1Utbaw269Ci9cA) —

http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2008/0

The 17th Anniversary Of The Republic’s Proclamation Celebrated In Th

THE 17TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE REPUBLIC’S PROCLAMATION CELEBRATED IN THE NKR

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Nagorno-Karabakh Republic
2008-09-03 13:07

On September 2, on the occasion of the 17th anniversary of proclamation
of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic festive events were held in the
regions and the capital of the NKR.

The republic’s leadership, headed by president Bako Sahakian, and
governmental delegation from Armenia, led by prime minister Tigran
Sargssian, visited the Memorial complex where wreath-laying ceremony
took place.

On the occasion of the holiday NKR president gave a ceremonial
reception.

The head of the state signed decrees on awarding titles of honors to
a number of prominent figures in different spheres. In his address
to people Bako Sahakian noted: "17 years ago the people of Artsakh
took the road of realization of their ancient dream on building free,
independent, democratic and social state. We have managed to overcome
this thorny path due to firm will, unity and solidarity. Artsakh has
become a symbol of revival of unconquerable spirit of the Armenian
nation."

At that, the president emphasized that "the NKR authorities adhere
to the principles of peaceful settlement of the existing conflicts".

"The existing differences are to be resolved via a direct dialogue.

Everyone must realize once and for all that independence of Artsakh has
no alternat ive and is not to be speculated", – Bako Sahakian noted.

"The success of Nagorno Karabakh is a subject-matter of pride not only
for the NKR population but for every Armenian as well. The Artsakhian
has proved that he stands firmly in his native land and struggles for
the right to live there freely", – prime minister of the Republic of
Armenia Tigran Sargssian said.

The head of the RA government expressed confidence that the Nagorno
Karabakh problem will be fairly resolved via peace negotiations.

Concert and sport events, as well as street festivities took place
in Stepanakert and the NKR regions. The festivities ended with the
firework in the central Square of Revival.

Russian presence near key Georgian port causes concern

Kansas City Star, MO
Aug 30 2008

Russian presence near key Georgian port causes concern

By SHASHANK BENGALI and DAVE MONTGOMERY
McClatchy Newspapers

POTI, Georgia | Weeks before Russia invaded Georgia this month,
excavators in this key Black Sea port began work on a $200 million
tax-free zone to triple the port’s capacity, Georgian officials said.

Some of that soft green earth now is occupied by Russian tanks and
soldiers camped behind huge, freshly dug trenches, within firing range
of ships approaching the port. A second Russian checkpoint is about a
mile away, along a river that’s sometimes used to ferry goods into
eastern Georgia.

The Russian presence is a stark illustration of how this 150-year-old
port, which handles millions of tons of cargo moving between Europe
and Central Asia, is now a key pressure point in the standoff between
Russia and the West.

The port is functioning normally again, despite numerous news reports
to the contrary and the claim by President Mikhail Saakashvili of
Georgia, most recently in Thursday’s Financial Times, that Russia
continues `to occupy’ Poti.

The Persian Gulf-funded expansion project ‘ with its aim of creating,
according to Georgian officials, the Dubai of the Caucasus ‘ is now on
hold, however. And major questions remain about the Kremlin’s
intentions here.

On Wednesday the U.S. shelved plans to unload 38 tons of humanitarian
cargo at Poti, not because the port was closed, but to avoid a
potential confrontation with Moscow. The U.S. Coast Guard cutter
Dallas delivered its cargo instead to Batumi, 50 miles to the south.

Poti is a key element in a network of seaports, railroads, highways
and energy pipelines to Azerbaijan and Armenia that makes Georgia a
major transit link between the East and West. The U.S. Commerce
Department has described the sleepy, working-class town of 50,000
people as the most important port in the mountainous Caucasus region,
which stretches east and west along Russia’s southern border.

The expansion of the port has enhanced Georgia’s strategic importance,
and some U.S. analysts think that Russia wants to dominate its former
Soviet neighbor to seize control of those transportation assets or to
stifle Western commerce in the region.

`It’s a huge deal,’ said Ariel Cohen of The Heritage Foundation, a
conservative research center in Washington. `What Russia is trying to
do is to plug the east-west transportation corridor that includes
railroads and pipelines.

`By controlling Poti, they’re controlling the strategic bottleneck of
the southern Caucasus.’

While Russian forces haven’t stopped cargo from entering or leaving
Poti, port officials are worried about what could happen if the forces
are provoked or after world attention on Georgia fades.

Friday’s developments

¢ABSORPTION: Russia intends to eventually absorb Georgia’s
breakaway province of South Ossetia, a South Ossetian official said,
three days after Moscow recognized the region as independent and drew
criticism from the West. A Kremlin spokeswoman said there was `no
official information’ on the matter.

¢PROTESTS: Georgia severed diplomatic ties with Moscow to protest
the presence of Russian troops on its territory. Russia said the move
would only make things worse. Georgia’s diplomats in Russia will leave
Moscow today, the Foreign Ministry said.

¢ENVOY?: EU leaders are not expected to impose sanctions on Russia
at their summit on Monday but may name a special envoy to Georgia to
ensure that a cease-fire is observed, French and Belgian officials
said. The U.S. and Europe have closed ranks in condemning Russia’s
actions but are struggling to find an effective response.

¢POLISH CONCERNS: Poland’s prime minister sought to reassure
worried residents near the site of a planned U.S. missile defense
base, pledging that they and the country would be more secure, despite
threats from an angry Russia.

ry/774080.html

http://www.kansascity.com/news/world/sto

Book Review: Will He, won’t he? "Ararat" by Frank Westerman

The Spectator
August 30, 2008

Will he, won’t He?;
BOOKS

by Alexander Waugh

ARARAT by Frank Westerman, translated by Sam Garrett Harvill Secker,
£16.99, pp. 229 ISBN 97881846550898 £11.99 (plus £2.45 p&p) 0870 429
6655

Who was Noah? The Bible tells us little. He was the flood hero of
course, but what else?

A drunken viniculturist who lived to the age of 950; who was 600 at
the time of the flood and 500 when he fathered Shem, Ham and
Japheth. His wrinkled bottom was ogled by his 100-year-old sons when
he passed out from drunkeness in his tent one night. But was he not
also an ‘upright man’ and a man who ‘walked with God’?

Each year hundreds of pilgrims, known as ‘Arkeologists’ make their way
to Mount Ararat (where the Turkish, Armenian and Iranian borders meet)
hoping to find clues and relics. Some return home with splints of
wood, others only with soft memories of mystic vision. Arkeologists
are simple folk, of whom the late Apollo astronaut, James Irwin, was
one. They ignore the fact that in Genesis, Noah’s ship came to rest
‘in the mountains of Ararat’, which is not the same as ‘on Mount
Ararat’. Never mind, they say, and never mind that the modern ‘Mount
Ararat’ is situated outside the old Kingdom of Ararat and is not
therefore among the ‘Mountains of Ararat’. Why should Arkeologists
care if their mountain only got its name from Marco Polo in the 13th
century? The Turks always called it Agri Dagi (Mountain of Pain), the
Armenians, Masis (Mother Mountain), and the Kurds, Ciyaye Agiri (Fiery
Mountain).

If you start with an unbudgeable faith in Ararat you don’t give a fig
that the Qu’ran claims that the Ark came to rest on al-Judi, a
mountain miles to the south; that the 2nd-century BC Book of Jubilees
says it was Mount Lubar, that Nicholas of Damascus says it was an
Armenian peak called Baris.

In the Babylonian account, the oldest extant Deluge story, from which
the Genesis authors undoubtedly snitched their plot, the Ark lands on
the top of Mount Nizir.

Enter Frank Westerman, a clever, talented 43-year-old Dutchman of
Puritan stock. His grandfather and mother were Creationists. He was
baptised and, brought up in rigid Protestant faith, ‘permeated with
Christianity’, but from his early twenties he ceased to pray. At
university he studied tropical agriculture, then he became a
journalist, reporting from war-torn Bosnia and later from Moscow. His
books have won important literary prizes. He first saw Ararat, the
great mountain-volcano, from the Soviet side. It seemed to pull
him. ‘I wanted, ‘ he says, ‘to test my resolve as a non-believer
… to see whether faith could touch me or not.’ Soon he had forged a
plan: to climb to its summit and to write a book about ‘belief and
knowledge, religion and science, with Ararat as its focal point’.

So he decided to leave his young wife and daughter and to scale the
17,000-footer on his own. When Westerman outlined this scheme to his
publisher he was abruptly warned: ‘Promise me one thing: that halfway
through the manuscript you won’t start writing he with a capital H.’
‘And if I do?’ he asked. ‘Then I won’t publish it.’ God does appear as
a ‘Him’ halfway through, but his publisher either failed to notice or
decided that Westerman was far too good an author to reprimand. The
result of his labours is a short book of stupendous richness and
complexity, a cornucopia of jumbled facts about geology, history and
science, woven into a personal memoir and travelogue that combines
stories about the lives of his teachers with information about Dutch
mining, family sentiment, religious belief, academic rivalry,
portraits of fellow travellers, mountaineering history, politics,
personalities and an abundance of lesser, uncategorisable
side-detail. All this diverse material is held together by a thread of
tension as to whether Westerman will find faith halfway up the
mountain. When the air is thin, the climber exhausted, the cold starts
to bite and the sweeping views turn to an icy blur, will our hero and
guide suddenly behold the Arkeologists’ light? Will he start digging
for shards of the patriarch’s wine glasses under the rubble of the
Ahora Gorge, or fall prostrate before an outcrop of rock known as the
‘Ararat Anomaly’ that some believe to be the fossilised remains of the
Ark?

At timed intervals Westerman taunts his readers with this
possibility. If faith could come to the astronaut, he argues, maybe it
will also come to him. The book (a fine translation from the Dutch by
Sam Garrett) is unquestionably eccentric, but written with enough
knowledge, craft and competence to keep the drowsiest of readers wide
awake from first to last.

The answer to the author’s most pressing question is tucked neatly
behind a glancing metaphor right at the end.

Russian warning on Nato warships

Russian warning on Nato warships

ws/-Russian-warning-on-Nato.4439182.jp
Date: 29 August 2008

By Gerri Peev

RUSSIA has issued a stark warning over what it says is a build-up of
Nato ships in the Black Sea, as tensions rise to their highest level
since the outbreak of hostilities in Georgia.

The missile destroyer USS McFaul is already off the coast, with the US
Coastguard ship Dallas docked in Georgia’s port of Batumi, both to show
support for the Caucasus nation. Washington has now ordered the
flagship of its 6th Fleet, the sophisticADVERTISEMENTated command ship
Mount Whitney, into the area, saying it will deliver humanitarian
supplies. But the flotilla has angered the Kremlin.

Dmitry Rogozin, the Russian ambassador to Nato, warned against western
interference in Georgia’s two breakaway regions, saying: "If Nato takes
military actions against Abkhazia and South Ossetia, acting solely in
support of Tbilisi, this will mean a declaration of war on Russia."

Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, dragged the
United States presidential candidates into the row. He suggested
Georgia might have been pushed by someone in the US into using force to
protect the two separatist states, saying the anti-Moscow rhetoric
would help give a competitive advantage to one of the candidates.

Colonel-General Anatoly Nogovitsyn, Russia’s deputy chief of the
general staff, claimed up to 18 Nato=2
0vessels were in, or expected to be
in, the Black Sea, and he attacked the use of warships to deliver aid
to Georgia as "devilish".

Three frigates ` from Spain, Germany and Poland ` sailed into the Black
Sea eight days ago. They were joined later by a US frigate, the Taylor,
for port visits and exercises off the coasts of Romania and Bulgaria.
Four warships of Nato member Turkey are also in the Black Sea.

Mr Putin’s spokesman said: "The appearance of Nato battleships here in
the Black Sea basin ¦ and the decision to deliver humanitarian aid (to
Georgia] using Nato battleships is something that can hardly be
explained.

"Let us hope that we do not see any direct confrontation."

Russia claims the build-up is contrary to the 1936 Montreux Convention,
which regulates the passage of warships there. But that charge has been
denied by Carmen Romero, a Nato spokeswoman, who said the alliance had
applied for transit into the Black Sea in June and stressed that the
vessels would stay less than 21 days, as required by the convention.

"There is no Nato naval build-up in the Black Sea," she said. "Nato is
conducting a routine and long planned exercise limited to the western
part of the Black Sea. The exercise is not related to the crisis in
Georgia."

Meanwhile, in an interview with CNN, Mr Putin, the former president,
suggested the conflict was orchestrated to give one side in t
he battle
for the White House an advantage. Although he did not single out John
McCain, the Republican candidate has been more strident in his
criticism of Russia than his Democratic rival, Barack Obama.

Mr McCain has said that Nato’s failure to sign up Georgia into the
military alliance had left the country vulnerable. And while Mr Obama
has called for restraint on both sides, he has condemned Russian
aggression.

Mr Putin said he suspected someone in the US had provoked the Georgia
conflict to make the situation more tense and create "a competitive
advantage for one of the candidates fighting for the post of US
president".

He went on: "The fact is that US citizens were, indeed, in the area in
conflict during the hostilities. It should be admitted they would do so
only following direct orders from their leaders."

Mr Putin added that the US had armed and trained Georgia.

But a White House spokeswoman, Dana Perino, said: "To suggest that the
United States orchestrated this on behalf of a political candidate ` it
sounds not rational."

Pressure on Russia will mount on Monday at an emergency summit of
European Union leaders, to be attended by Gordon Brown, the Prime
Minister.

Bernard Kouchner, the French foreign minister, suggested the EU would
consider sanctions against Russia.

As current president of the EU, France said it would aim to get
consensus among all 27 countries of20the bloc if sanctions were
envisaged.

While the EU is not contemplating the most stringent of sanctions, such
as the travel bans and arms embargoes imposed on Iran, it could
postpone talks on a new partnership and co-operation agreement with
Russia scheduled for September. The EU could also scrutinise the
activities of the Russian energy giant Gazprom, which obtains 70 per
cent of its profits from sales to Europe.

Washington said it was considering scrapping a US-Russia civilian
nuclear co-operation pact in response to the conflict.

In a related development, Moscow, which has been incensed by the
proposed US anti-ballistic missile shield in Poland and the Czech
Republic, announced it had successfully tested a long-range Topol-M
intercontinental ballistic missile.

According to the Russians, the missile has been modified to avoid
detection by the anti-missile defence systems.

Meanwhile, after previous tough criticism of Russia, David Miliband,
the Foreign Secretary, yesterday said "there is no question of
launching an all-out war with Russia".

He said: "No-one ever doubted that a Russian army of up to 800,000
people was going to defeat a Georgian army of up to 18,000 people.
Indeed, that has happened over the last two weeks. The question,
though, for Russia is whether it wants to suffer the isolation, the
loss of respect and the loss of trust that comes from that."

A statement signed by Mr Miliband, alo
ng with the foreign ministers of
the US, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan, said they "deplored"
Moscow’s "excessive use of military force" in Georgia.

Moscow was offered one supportive comment, however. Alexander
Lukashenko, the president of Belarus, Russia’s closest ex-Soviet ally,
said the Kremlin "had no other moral choice" but to recognise the
Georgian regions.

The crisis flared early this month when Georgian forces tried to retake
South Ossetia and Russia launched an overwhelming counter-attack.

Russian forces swept the Georgian army out of the rebel region and are
still occupying some areas of Georgia proper.

PROFILE

THE USS Mount Whitney, a Blue Ridge class command ship, is the flagship
of the United States navy’s 6th Fleet.

It is also the command and control ship for Nato’s southern European
strike force.

It is currently based out of Gaeta, Italy.

Considered by some to be the most sophisticated command, control,
communications, computer and intelligence (C4I) ship ever commissioned,
Mount Whitney incorporates various elements of the most advanced C4I
electronic equipment and gives the embarked joint task-force commander
the capability to control all other US naval sea units.

Mount Whitney can receive and transmit large amounts of secure data
from anywhere through HF, UHF, VHF, SHF and EHF communications paths.

The vessel carries little in the way of armaments, other than guns for
close-
range defence.

Mount Whitney typically carries enough food to feed the crew of over
300 for 90 days and can transport supplies to support an emergency
evacuation of 3,000 people.

Its distilling units make over 100,000 gallons of fresh water a day.

Traditional allies of Moscow denounce force

CHINA and several central Asian nations rebuffed Russia’s hopes of
international support for its actions in Georgia, issuing a statement
yesterday denouncing the use of force and calling for respect for every
country’s territorial integrity.

A joint declaration from the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation, or
SCO, also offered some support for Russia’s "active role in promoting
peace" following a ceasefire, but overall it appeared to increase
Moscow’s international isolation.

The Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, had appealed to the SCO
alliance ` whose members include Russia, China and four central Asian
countries of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan ` for
unanimous support of Moscow’s response to Georgia’s "aggression".

But none of the other alliance members joined Russia in recognising the
independence claims of Georgia’s separatist regions, Abkhazia and South
Ossetia.

Mr Medvedev’s search for support in Asia had raised fears that the
alliance would turn the furore over Georgia into a broader
confrontation between East and West, pitting the United States and
Europe against their two main Cold War foes.=2
0But China has
traditionally been wary of endorsing separatists abroad, mindful of its
own problems with Tibet and Muslims in the western territory of
Xinjiang.

The joint statement, which was unanimously endorsed, made a point of
stressing the sanctity of borders ` two days after Russia sought to
redraw Georgia’s territory.

"The participants¦ underscore the need for respect of the historical
and cultural traditions of each country and each people, and for
efforts aimed at preserving the unity of the state and its territorial
integrity," the declaration said.

Internet maps ‘are wiping out’ British landmarks

THE internet is wiping thousands of British landmarks off the map, a
leading geographical society warned yesterday.

Churches, ancient woodlands and stately homes are in danger of being
forgotten as internet maps fail to include the traditional landmarks,
said Mary Spence, the president of the British Cartographic Society.

In recent years, web applications such as Google Earth have become a
popular way for people to search for maps and satellite images.

Speaking yesterday at a Royal Geographic Society conference, Ms Spence
said: "Corporate cartographers are demolishing thousands of years of
history ` not to mention Britain’s remarkable geography ` at a stroke
by not including them on maps which millions of us now use every day.

"We’re in real danger of losing what makes maps so unique;=2
0giving us a
feel for a place even if we’ve never been there."

But Ed Parsons, the geospatial technologist at Google, said the way in
which people used maps was changing. He said: "Internet maps can now be
personalised, allowing people to include landmarks and information that
are of interest to them.

"Anyone can create their own maps, or use experiences to collaborate
with others in charting their local knowledge.

"These traditional landmarks are still on the map, but people need to
search for them," Mr Parsons said.

"Interactive maps will display precisely the information people want,
when they want it.

"You couldn’t possibly have everything already pinpointed."

1936 treaty comes under the spotlight

THE Montreux Convention cited by Nato with regard to Black Sea access
may be regarded by some as an obscure treaty, but amid the current high
level of tension in international politics with Russia, its terms are
coming under close scrutiny.

The agreement, signed on 20 July, 1936, gives Turkey full control over
the Bosphorus Straits and the Dardanelles and regulates military
activity in the region.

It permits Turkey to remilitarise the straits and imposes new
restrictions on the passage of combatant vessels.

The treaty also guarantees the free passage of civilian vessels in
peacetime.

It severely restricts the passage of non-Turkish military vessels and
prohibits some types of warships, such
as aircraft carriers, from
passing through the straits.

The terms of the convention have been a source of controversy over the
years, most notably concerning Russia’s military access to the
Mediterranean.

Under the agreement, Turkey must be notified 15 days before military
ships sail into the Black Sea, and warships cannot remain longer than
21 days. The convention applies limits on individual and aggregate
tonnage and numbers.

These limitations effectively preclude the transit of major "capital"
warships and submarines of non-Black Sea powers through the straits,
unless exempted under Article 17.

That clause permits a naval force of any tonnage or composition to pay
a courtesy visit of limited duration to a port in the straits, at the
invitation of the Turkish government.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestne

ANKARA: Turk pres to accept the invitation of Sargsyan to visit ROA

Turk pres to accept the invitation of Sargsyan to visit Armenia: report

82083.asp?gid=244&sz=68441
Saturday, August 30, 2008

Turkish President Abdullah Gul has accepted an invitation from his
Armenian counterpart to watch the World Cup qualifier between the
Turkish-Armenian national teams in Yerevan as the Turkish Foreign
Ministry said the visit would contribute to renewed relations between
the two countries, Vatan daily reported on Saturday. (UPDATED)

Armenia however has not yet been informed of Gul’s decision, the report
said, adding that the president is expected to make an official
announcement next week.

Armenia President Serz Sargsyan invited Gul to watch the World Cup
qualifying match between the two country’s national teams on Sept. 6 to
mark "a new symbolic start in the two countries’ relations".

Gul had previously said that Sargsyan’s invitation is an example of
contributions towards solving the problems that exist between the two
countries and that an evaluation of the invitation was underway taking
every possibility into account.

In a gesture of good faith, Armenia offered to lift all visa
requirements and payments for Turkish citizens traveling to the capital
Yerevan for the match, the report also said.

Although Turkey is among the first countries to recognize Armenia when
it declared its independence, there are no diplomatic relations between
two countries as Armenia continues to press the international community
to admit the so-called "genocide" claims, instead of accepting Turkey’s
call to investigate the allegations, and its invasion of 20 percent of
Azerbaijani territory due to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue despite U.N.
Security Council resolutions on the issue.

Armenia, with the backing of the Diaspora, claims up to 1.5 million of
their kin were slaughtered in orchestrated killings in 1915. Turkey
rejects the claims, saying that 300,000

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/home/97