ANKARA: Minorities To Shun Nationalist Parties In Elections

MINORITIES TO SHUN NATIONALIST PARTIES IN ELECTIONS
E. BariÞ AltintaÞ

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
June 14 2007

Recent stances taken by political parties on issues regarding European
Union reforms, minority rights and nationalism could be a determinant
of how members of religious minority groups will vote in this summer’s
elections.

Turkey’s minorities are increasingly drawn to political parties that
display respect for democracy. Even more so, they are growing cooler
towards those flirting with neo-nationalists who oppose EU membership,
improved minority rights and extended freedoms.

"To be honest, we Armenians prefer the Justice and Development Party
[AK Party] to the opposition Republican People’s Party [CHP].

The AK Party’s attitude toward minorities is less nationalist. The
[Recep Tayyip] Erdoðan government is very open to our demands,"
said Armenian Patriarch Mesrob II, the religious leader of Turkey’s
60,000 Armenian Orthodox citizens, in a recent interview with German
Der Spiegel. He told the magazine that Turkey’s Armenian community
has good relations with the AK Party government.

Sebu Aslangil, a member of the Patriarchate’s law commission, told
the news Web site NTVMSNBC in an interview conducted this Monday that
"it is a fact that the [Armenian] community is leaning towards the
AK Party and the independents. A major role in this was played by the
foundations law – which the [Republican People’s Party] CHP fiercely
opposed when the AK Party tried hard to pass it." Although Aslangil
stressed that it is impossible to talk about a homogenous pattern of
voting in the community, he expressed the opinion that a majority of
the community clearly felt the AK Party was closest to solving the
problems of minorities.

Zeki Basatemir, chairperson of the Syriac Catholic Church Foundation,
said Syriac Catholics, estimated to number about 5000, were reviewing
programs and policies of all political parties like all other Turkish
citizens to find the candidates who are closest to them. "No concrete
name has come up yet, but I can’t say we are unhappy with this current
government. We think they are good at solving our problems." There is
also the Syriac Orthodox community, thought to number around 20,000
as of 2005.

The Syriacs are the largest religious Christian community in the
country, although they are not legally considered a minority group.

Other groups, however, are more uncertain than others. Yusuf Beytaþ
from Mardin’s Syriac Community says the individual preferences of
community members greatly vary. "We have a lot of people who like the
AK Party, as well as the CHP or the other parties," he told Today’s
Zaman. Silvio Ovadya, leader of Turkey’s Jewish community of 20,000,
said Jewish minorities are not yet decided. "A party has not been
given support for the elections among the community. Maybe later
there will be a name, but not yet," he added. Ovadya said he did not
feel that most members of the community overwhelmingly pre-ferred
a single political party. However, leaders of communities tend to
be more reserved in speaking on politics. Many of Turkey’s Greeks
and Armenians vocally and very clearly express their resentment of
nationalism and political parties that push aside democracy in order
to exploit the nation’s nationalist feelings.

Mihail Vasiliadis, publishing director of Apoyevmatini, an 80-year-old
newspaper for the Greek community, said in a recent interview,
"The AK Party has to come to power so that I can feel myself as a
citizen after 60 years." He is one of the many people in this country
who feel the increasing threat of neo-nationalism and who know that
Turkey’s can only be found in democracy.

Turkey’s minorities have had to endure much since the founding of
the republic, sometimes at the hands of populist politicians and
sometimes simply out of the social prejudices and discrimination
against them. In the 1930s they were subject to a discriminatory levy
known as the Assets Tax, which imposed higher taxes on non-Muslims.

In the 1950s, they were subject to mass violence on the streets
of Beyoðlu at the hands of an angry mob. However the tide might be
starting to turn as more and more European Union-inspired reforms
are being passed, ensuring equal rights for all religious and
ethnic minorities. One example is a recent draft on foundations the
government tried to pass last year in Parliament. The law, which
stipulated that all buildings and other assets taken unjustly in the
’30s from minority foundations be returned, was not passed in the
face of fierce opposition from the main opposition CHP.

The CHP argued that returning the possessions of minorities was
tantamount to selling the country and that the law could be passed
only if EU countries guaranteed the same rights for their Turkish
minorities. This sentiment deeply hurt Turkey’s non-Muslim citizens.

A hundred intellectuals from minority groups, including Turkish
Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, who was slain by a neo-nationalist
youth earlier this year, signed a declaration condemning the CHP’s
mentality that considers its non-Muslim citizens to be "hostages."

–Boundary_(ID_7ZjSsA6LNzAt co+Hcy73nw)–

No Exchange Of Churches Expected Between Armenian Apostolic Church (

NO EXCHANGE OF CHURCHES EXPECTED BETWEEN ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH (AAC) AND GEORGIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH

arminfo
2007-06-14 00:54:00

No exchange of churches is expected between the Armenian Apostolic
Church (AAC) and Georgian Orthodox Church in the course of the
visit of Catholicos of All Armenians Karekin II to Tbilisi, Press
Secretary of the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin, priest Vaghram
Melikyan told ArmInfo. He has not specified the date of the visit so
far. He mentioned that AAC expects settlement of two problems set to
the Georgian authorities: the status of the Georgian Diocese of AAC
and return of the Armenian historical churches to it. "The status
of a legal entity is inadmissible to religious organizations. Hence,
the Georgian Diocese of AAC has no status at present and the churches
belonging to it are not its property," he said.

After Georgia has gained indepedence, some of the local Armenian
churches were used as libraries or were transformed into Georgian
churches. Some Georgian historians have created a distorted opinion
that these churches were Georgian from the very beginning and then
were sold to Armenians or allegedly these churches were built on
the basis of Georgian ones. Now, the Georgian Diocese of AAC has
only 21 churches and demands back the churches that had belonged
to it for centuries. Some of these churches were confiscated in
the Soviet period. In this connection, His Holiness Karekin II sent
official messages to the Georgian leadership. In response, a number
of Georgian officials stated that there are Georgian churches in the
regions of Lori and Tashir. They even demanded these churches to be
returned. Recently, Georgian religious expert Basil Kobakhidze stated
that in the course of the visit of the Catholicos of All Armenians to
Tbilisi, the Armenian and Georgian churches will sign an agreement
on transfer of 10 churches to AAC. In return, Georgia will receive
7 churches in Lori and Tavush.

The situation is still tense. However, no exchange of churches is
expected, V. Melikyan said.

Basic Human Rights Were Violated

BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED
Nerses Ohanjanyan, former NKR parliament member

KarabakhOpen
13-06-2007 11:50:33

I learned about the arbitrariness against one of the honorable
activists of the Artsakh movement James Ghahramanyan. I knew him
as one of the pioneers of the movement, a true patriot and citizen,
and I protest against this illegality.

The society must condemn such actions because the basic human
rights were violated, the right to work and the right to vote. James
Ghahramanyan’s case is clear political persecution.

The government and the head of state must help create a normal
pre-election atmosphere in the country. However, this and a number
of other cases are evidence that the government does not perform its
function. Or does not perform it duly.

At the same time, I do not rule out that the head of the company wanted
to do a favor to the government. Officials are usually driven to make
such moves by group interests, desire to hold on to their posts, the
suspicious past, which makes people vulnerable and dependent. People
with such character and past do not care for other people’s merits
and contribution.

The society should condemn such cases, otherwise it is "contagious".

Catholicos Of All Armenians Receives CEO Of Millenniumchallenge Corp

CATHOLICOS OF ALL ARMENIANS RECEIVES CEO OF MILLENNIUMCHALLENGE CORPORATION

Noyan Tapan
Jun 13 2007

ETCHMIADZIN, JUNE 13, NOYAN TAPAN. Catholicos of All Armenians
Karekin II on June 12 received the delegation headed by the Chief
Executive Officer of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) John
Danilovich, NT was informed by the press service of the Mother See
of Holy Etchmiadzin.

"We are glad that assistance is being provided to the Armenian economy
under the Millennium Chalenge Program. The aid provided to our people
today is indeed great," His Holiness noted, welcoming the visit of
Ambassador John Danilovich to the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin and
expressing his satisfaction with the activities of the Millennium
Challenge Corporation.

Karekin II presented to the guests the mission of the Armenian
Apostolic Church, the history of the foundation of the Mother See of
Holy Etchmiadzin, speaking about the current activities of the church
and those challenges and difficulties that face it.

Expressing his gratitude for the reception, John Danilovich in his turn
informed His Holiness about the details of their visit to Armenia and
expressed his satisfaction with the results of the work done during
this period. "We are sure that the program will be of great use to
the Armenian population," J. Danilovich said.

Peacekeepers Will Not Be Able To Provide Peaceful Co-Existence Betwe

PEACEKEEPERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE BETWEEN ARMENIAN AND AZERI NATIONS

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.06.2007 18:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Peacekeeping forces, which are being presented by
the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs as a guarantee for the security of the
Armenian population of Nagorno Karabakh, will not be able to provide
peaceful co-existence between Azeri and Armenian nations, head of
analytical center "Mitk" Eduard Abramian stated at the presentation
of a brochure titled "Peacekeepers: information package". He said,
re-deployment of Armenian troops from territories, which are considered
as a security belt around Nagorno Karabakh, is unacceptable, since
in this case it will be impossible to avoid large-scale military
operations between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan.

Speaking about possible perspectives of placing peacekeeping troops
on the above-mentioned territories, co-author of the brochure Aram
Palian presented details of the peacekeeping operations in Sudan,
Rwanda, Kosovo, Iraq and other hot spots of the planet. He informed
that actually everywhere, where exists an international peacekeeping
contingent, murders, humiliations and drug trade have acquired a mass
character. Commenting on opinions of a number of Armenian politicians
on possible deployment of peacekeeping troops in some regions of
Nagorno Karabakh, Palian stated that probably the Armenian government
has undertaken an obligation, which obstacles the rapid denial from
similar perspectives.

"As you know, Armenia actively participates in peacekeeping processes,
probably this very fact does not allow the leaders of the country
to refuse from "services" of peacekeepers in the Karabakh conflict
settlement," he concluded.

In his part another co-author of the brochure Karen Vardanesyan
also stressed the unacceptability of deploying peacekeepers in the
conflict zone. As an argument he cited one of the recent UN reports on
activities of peacekeepers in various corners of the planet. According
to that document, today the major part of peacekeeping operations is
doomed to failure.

ANKARA: Erdogan Pushes For Center, Purges National View Camp

ERDOðAN PUSHES FOR CENTER, PURGES NATIONAL VIEW CAMP
Reha Camuroðlu – Ertuðrul Gunay – Zafer Uskul
Ercan Yavuz Ankara

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
June 6 2007

PM Recep Tayyip Erdoðan, who set the new lineup for the Justice and
Develop-ment Party (AK Party) from prominent center-right politicians
and social democrats, has not re-nominated 163 AK Party deputies.

Notably, many of the deputies who are not nominated from the party
lists are former National View (Milli Goruþ) supporters. His wife Emine
Erdoðan has been influential in the candidate selection process as
deputies who have problems with their spouses have not been included
the party lists. Ertuðrul Gunay, a prominent social democrat, has
been given the second position in Ýstanbul.

Erdoðan had prepared the AK Party’s deputy candidate lists for the
2002 elections in collaboration with Abdulkadir Aksu, Abdullatif
Þener, Bulent Arýnc, and Abdullah Gul. He has completely changed the
composition of the lists, acting more independent. While deputies
close to Gul managed to remain on the lists, Arýnc’s and Þener’s
colleagues have been almost completely purged.

Ministers not nominated

In addition to Deputy Prime Minister Abdullatif Þener, who announced
that he would not run for Parliament, Industry Minister Ali Coþkun
has not been nominated. In addition, Sivas Deputy Omer Kulaksýz,
who is at odds with Þener, has not been included on the party list.

Great purge of the ‘National View’

Erdoðan have vetoed most of the deputies who come from the National
View, the ideology of ousted Welfare Party leader Necmettin Erbakan.

Among those not re-nominated include Ýsmail Alptekin, founding chairman
of the Virtue Party (FP) and deputy parliamentary speaker; Mehmet
Elkatmýþ, the chairman of the Parliamentary Human Rights Commission;
Eyup Sanay; Tevhid Karakaya; Omer Ozyýlmaz; Nurettin Aktaþ; Azmi
Ateþ; Mustafa Baþ; Huseyin Kansu; Remzi Cetin; Mustafa Unaldý; Halil
Urun; Mehmet Ali Bulut; Ali Sezal, Sebahattin Yýldýz; Musa Uzunkaya;
Ersonmez Yarbay; Ergun Daðcýoðlu and Mali Ejder Arvas.

Husrev Kutlu, who is known for his statements against the General
Staff, has been given the first position in Adana.

Time to pay for March 1 motion

The AK Party has not nominated deputies who strongly opposed the March
1 motion — which called for the US using Turkey as a staging point
for its Iraq invasion — including Bursa Deputy Ertuðrul Yalcýnbayýr,
Adana Deputy Abdullah Calýþkan, Ankara Deputy Ersonmez Yarbay, Ahmet
Faruk Unsal and Ramazan Toprak. This is considered as revenge for the
motion. In a surprise move, Erdoðan has not given a go to Parliamentary
Foreign Affairs Commission Chairman Mehmet Dulger.

Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Ali Þahin, who was elected from
Ýstanbul in the previous elections, has been transferred to
Antalya. Finance Minister Kemal Unakýtan, and former Transportation
Minister Binali Yýldýrým have been nominated from Eskiþehir and
Erzincan, respectively. Employment Minister Murat Baþesgioðlu has
been transferred from Kastamonu to Ýstanbul, State Minister Kurþad
Tuzmen from Gaziantep to Mersin and Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul from
Kocaeli to Ýzmir.

Erdoðan has not approved the candidacy of journalist Nazlý Ilýcak.

Serdar Arseven, Ankara representative of Vakit daily, and Sadullah
Ozcan, Deputy Ankara representative of Cihan news agency have also
not been nominated by Erdoðan. He has given Fuat Bol, the editor in
Chief of Turkiye daily, who was a classmate of Erdoðan at an Imam
Hatip high school, the 10th position in Ýstanbul while Mehmet Ocaktan,
Ankara representative of Yeni Þafak daily, has been given the 10th
position in Bursa.

Announcer Ýkbal Gurpýnar, Yýldýrým Akbulut’s son-in-law Tanju
Yazgan Arýkan, United Fenerbahce Fan Club Chairman Aziz Yýlmaz,
Armenian-origin Verkin Arýoba, Ozhan Eren and the party’s surveyor
Hasan Basri Yýldýz have not been nominated.

Erdoðan, who was elected deputy from Siirt, the hometown of his
wife, in the by-elections, will run for Parliament from the first
position in the first constituency zone in Ýstanbul. The Cabinet has
been nominated as follows: Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul (Kayseri),
Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Ali Þahin (Antalya), Turkey’s chief EU
negotiator Ali Babacan (Ankara), State Minister Beþir Atalay (Ankara),
State Minister Mehmet Aydýn (Ýzmir), State Minister Nimet Cubukcu
(Ýstanbul), State Minister Kurþad Tuzmen (Mersin), Defense Minister
Vecdi Gonul (Ýzmir), Finance Minister Kemal Unakýtan (Eskiþehir),
Health Minister Recep Akdað (Erzurum), Employment and Social Security
Minister Murat Baþesgioðlu (Ýstanbul), Public Works and Settlement
Minister Faruk Nafiz Ozak (Trabzon), Energy and Natural Resources
Minister Hilmi Guler (Ordu), Education Minister Huseyin Celik (Van),
Environment and Forestry Minister Osman Pepe (Kocaeli), Culture and
Tourism Minister Atilla Koc (Aydýn), Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Mehdi Eker (Diyarbakýr), former Interior Minister Abdulkadir Aksu
(Ýstanbul), former Transpor-tation Minister Binali Yýldýrým (Erzincan)
and former Justice Minister Cemil Cicek (Ankara).

New members are given top positions

Newcomers who have been given top spots in the party are Ertuðrul
Gunay, Zafer Caðlayan, Mehmet Þimþek, Mehmet Saðlam, Professor Zafer
Uskul, Nursuna Memecan, Haluk Ozdalga, Reha Camuroðlu, Zeynep Daðý,
Mehmet Saðlam, Ahmet Ýyimaya, Fazilet Daðcý Cýðlýk, Ozlem Turkone,
Osman Yaðmurdereli, Erdal Kalkan, Hamza Yerlikaya, Ulku Gokalp Guney,
Mehmet Domac and Suleyman Bolunmez. Erdoðan has also assigned civil
servants who resigned from their offices upon his request such as
Omer Dincer, Necdet Unuvar, Necat Birinci and Mustafa Cetin, to
secure positions in the party lists. Erdoðan has paid heed to the
voice of the party’s local organizations, giving some heads of local
organizations top positions in the lists.

AK Party’s Alevi move

In addition to opening its doors to center right and social
democratic politicians, the AK Party is trying to appeal to Alevi
citizens. Professor Reha Camuroðlu, an Alevi intellectual, has been
nominated from Ýstanbul while another Alevi, Haydar Doðan, has been
nominated from Tunceli, where the AK Party had previously failed to
secure a seat in Parliament.

–Boundary_(ID_SxzVAFPhH+DLM06lOk7L+Q )–

Azeri Soldier Pledges Guilty In Treason To Homeland

AZERI SOLDIER PLEDGES GUILTY IN TREASON TO HOMELAND
By Aghavni Haroutiunian

AZG Armenian Daily
05/06/2007

There frequently happen paradoxes in the course of the court trials
and investigations of the return of the Azeri prisoners to their
homeland. In particular, "Azeri.press" agency informed that Eladniz
Nouriev who was a war-prisoner in Armenia, pledged guilty in treason
to his homeland.

This is not the first case, when the Azeri soldiers who pass the
Azeri-Armenian border by accident, are being accused to treason to
homeland, as soon as they return home.

Russians See Best Friends, Arch Foes Among Former Soviet Republics

RUSSIANS SEE BEST FRIENDS, ARCH FOES AMONG FORMER SOVIET REPUBLICS
Lyudmila Alexandrova

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
June 1, 2007 Friday 10:52 AM EST

As before, most Russians see their arch foes – and bosom friends
likewise – among the former Soviet republics.

In their eyes Russia’s worst enemy these days is Estonia, and the
best friend, Kazakhstan.

In the group of non-CIS countries Germany firmly holds first place as
to the percentage of Russians who say it is the friendliest country
of all.

In an opinion poll of 1,600 by the Yuri Levada Center of Analysis
held on May 11-14, 60 percent pointed to Estonia as Russia’s worst
enemy. In this sense Estonia this year has outdone Latvia (36 percent).

NEWSru.com recalls that in 2006 a tiny 28 percent of the polled
Russians said Estonia was an unfriendly country.

Relations between Russia and Estonia turned from bad to worse after
the Estonian authorities late last April, acting in defiance of
protests from Moscow and from many Estonian citizens, too, dismantled
the monument honoring the Soviet soldiers who had liberated Estonia
from Nazism.

Before, Russians’ negative attitude to the Baltic countries was most
often attributed to the abuse of the rights of ethnic Russians, who
account for less than seven percent of the population of Lithuania,
13 percent of the population of Estonia and nearly 29 percent of the
population of Latvia.

In the same club of countries unfriendly to Russia, alongside the
"bosom foes" sharing a common Soviet past, there are also the United
States and Poland.

According to the Levada Center, one in two citizens of Russia applies
the term ‘enemy’ to Georgia, and one in three to Latvia (36 percent),
Lithuania (32 percent), and the United States (35 percent).

Also on the list of hostile countries are Ukraine (23 percent), Poland
(20 percent, in contrast to seven percent last year), Afghanistan
(11 percent), Iraq (8 percent) and Iran (7 percent).

On top of the list of friendly countries are Kazakhstan, Belarus,
Germany, China, Armenia and India.

The findings indicate that today, just as a year ago, Russia’s closest
friends are Kazakhstan (33 percent said so in 2006, and 39 percent
in 2007), and Belarus, (47-38 percent).

"The best friends are the same, but changes in their rating are
quite telling," says NEWSru.com. "Firstly, Belarus has lost part of
its supporters and now it has to share the status of Russia’s friend
number one with Kazakhkstan."

Ukraine is rated as an unfriendly country a little bit more rarely
than a year ago, and Poland, a little bit more often.

On the whole, a variety of opinion polls over the past few years
repeatedly confirmed that of all countries Russians like the European
ones most of all – Germany, in the first place. As before, they are
not at all enthusiastic about things American.

The national public opinion studies center VCIOM last October found
that of all parts of the world Russians see Western Europe as the most
attractive place where to resettle, if need be. In case of emergency
36 percent of Russians would prefer to move to that region.

>From that standpoint the most popular countries are Germany (12
percent), and also France and Britain (4 percent each).

All opinion polls held lately confirmed many Russians’ negative
attitude to the United States.

The Public Opinion Fund last September showed that according to one in
two Russians (49 percent) the United States plays a negative role in
the modern world, and only a tiny 16-percent fraction sees its role as
positive. Twenty seven percent of Russians say the United States is a
state friendly to Russia, and 55 percent argue it is unfriendly. This
ratio has remained rather stable over the past two years.

The chief of the analysis department at the Political Technologies
Center, Tatyana Stanovaya, argues that the answer to the question
about the reason for the Russians’ pro-European, pro-German sentiment
and anti-American attitudes lies on the surface.

"The level of relations with Germany makes itself felt. These
relations are more institutionalized than those with the other European
countries," Stanovaya told Itar-Tass.

The political scientist recalled that Germany was one of Russia’s
main foreign economic partners. The factor of President Vladimir
Putin’s personal likes and dislikes is also present. Putin spent in
Germany many years of his career and his attitude to that country
is sympathetic."

"The Russians see that the relationship with Germany is particularly
warm, and this cannot but influence their preferences, too,"
Stanovaya said. As far as the Russians’ pro-European sentiment in
general is concerned, "Europe for Russia is a benchmark in terms of
living standards, social insurance and culture."

The trend towards anti-Americanism, according to the political
scientist, developed back in the 1990s during President Boris Yeltsin’s
rule, when the public at large grew disillusioned about liberalism.

"At first everybody tried to live ‘the way they do in America’,
but then, after the disappointment over the liberal reforms that
myth collapsed," Stanovaya said. "With time this cooling towards the
‘American dream’ was blended with the new Putin-era ideology. The
gist of the latter is this ‘Russia is rising from its knees, while
the United States is creating hindrances, because it wishes to Russia
to stay weak further on’."

Armenian Gas Operator Vows To Complete Iran Pipeline

ARMENIAN GAS OPERATOR VOWS TO COMPLETE IRAN PIPELINE
By Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
May 31 2007

Armenia’s Russian-owned national gas company has reportedly pledged
to build the second and final section of a natural gas pipeline from
Iran by the end of next year.

The first 40-kilometer Armenian section of the pipeline stretching from
the Iranian border to the southeastern town of Kajaran was inaugurated
in March by the president of the two neighboring countries. Officials
said then that Armenia will be able to import large volumes of
Iranian gas only after the construction of the pipeline’s second,
much longer section that would extend it from Kajaran to the southern
Ararat Valley.

The Arminfo news agency quoted Karen Karapetian, chairman of the
ArmRosGazprom (ARG) operator, as saying late Wednesday that his
company, which is controlled by Russia’s Gazprom gas monopoly, is
already beginning work on the 197-kilometer stretch and plans to
finish it in late 2008. He said ARG will invest 52 billion drams
($149 million) in the construction.

The remarks suggest that ARG has, after all, been granted ownership
of the pipeline’s Armenian section as part of a 2006 Russian-Armenian
agreement that reinforced Russian control of the Armenian energy
sector. Armenian government officials have said until now that the
pipeline’s transfer to ARG is not a forgone conclusion.

Armenia currently imports each year approximately 1.2 billion
cubic meters of Russian gas which generates about 40 percent of
its electricity and serves as the main source of winter heating for
Armenian households.

Officials have said that the pipeline from Iran will have an annual
capacity of 2.3 billion cubic meters. Most of the Iranian gas is
expected to be used for producing electricity and exporting it to Iran.

Next Motorcade With Property Of Russian Base To Depart For Armenia F

NEXT MOTORCADE WITH PROPERTY OF RUSSIAN BASE TO DEPART FOR ARMENIA FROM GEORGIA MAY 30

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.05.2007 15:26 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A motorcade will depart for Armenia from the Georgian
territory with the property of the Russian military base on Wednesday,
Aide to the Russian Ground Forces Commander in Chief colonel Igor
Konashenkov stated. "We are planing to send the 5th motorcade with
the property of the 62nd Russian military base dislocated in the
town of Akhalkalaki to the 102nd base in Gyumri (Armenia) on May 30,"
Konashenkov said.

According to the colonel the motorcade, which includes more than
20 trucks and tractors removes clothing and food property of the
Russian base. He also underlined an echelon is scheduled to be sent
from Georgia to Russia.

"The echelon will transport armament and material and technical reserve
of the 12th Russian base (town of Batumi)," the Aide to the Commander
Chief added. He said, the echelon includes 32 carriages and platforms,
and the total weight of the equipment due to be transported is more
than 200 tons.

"We are planning to send 14 more echelons and one motorcade from
the Georgian territory to Russia and the 102nd Russian base (Gyumri)
till the end of this year," Konashenkov said. He noted the echelons
and motorcades will remove the property of the Russian bases, which
must be closed in accordance with the agreement between Russia and
Georgia, RIA "Novosti" reports.