A History of Beer – Part 1

Brussels Journal

A History of Beer – Part 1

From the desk of Fjordman on Sat, 2009-08-22 23:37

As always when writing about a specific topic, I have used a
combination of different sources when doing research for this essay,
but the single most important source of information was A History of
Beer and Brewing by I. Hornsey. His book is perhaps a little bit too
much focused on Britain but is overall very comprehensive and well
worth reading. It traces the history of brewing from prehistoric times
until the turn of the twenty-first century. Another work I found
valuable was Richard W. Unger’s book Beer in the Middle Ages and the
Renaissance. Unger’s text contains a little information on
brewing-practices in the ancient world and even less of the
scientific-industrial brewing that we know after the Industrial
Revolution. However, his coverage of the Middle Ages and the early
modern period is quite good, and I will quote his work extensively
when writing about this period.

Fermented beverages brewed from grains such as rice or wheat have been
used in East Asia for thousands of years and played an important role
in the early religious life of China. The use of alcohol in moderation
was believed to be prescribed by heaven. Inscriptions on bones and
tortoise shells as well as bronze inscriptions preserve many records
of people from the Shang era (second millennium BC) worshiping their
ancestors with a variety of alcoholic beverages. Such beverages were
widely used in all segments of Chinese society for hospitality and as
a source of inspiration. During the Tang Dynasty (AD 618-907), the
Eight Immortals of the Wine Cup included some of the greatest scholars
and poets in China’s history, among them Li Bai and Du Fu, known for
their love of alcoholic drinks. Fermented beverages made from grapes
were not totally unknown in East Asia, but wine was never as widely
consumed there as it was in the western regions of Eurasia, although
this is slowly changing now due to Western cultural influences.

Kaffir beer is the traditional drink of the Bantu peoples of southern
Africa. It has been likened to "bubbling yogurt." The shelf-life of
the product is restricted to a few days, and "unlike most European
beers, African products contain a mixture of acids and alcohols, and
have a sour taste." In Mesoamerica, fermented drinks were known,
including one made from cacao beans, but north of Mexico, few or none
alcoholic beverages were produced in pre-Columbian times. The Berbers
of North Africa grew barley and wheat and made wine for centuries, but
beer was unknown in the region until it was introduced in modern times
by Europeans.

In South America, chicha is the generic name applied to native
beer. This brew typically contains a slight amount of alcohol,
1-3%. The Incas used the drink for ritual purposes, and traces of its
making have been found at the city of Machu Picchu. According to
scholar Terence N. D’Altroy in his book The Incas, fermented beverages
were so much a part of the cuisine in the Andes region `that being
forced to drink water was a form of punishment.’ The Incas around AD
1500 ruled over a vast empire stretching from Ecuador to central
Chile, despite many natural obstacles in this mountainous region, held
together by a network of roads and chains of runners who bore messages
either orally or recorded in quipu, a code of knots in colored cords.

As historian J. M. Roberts states, `Though preliterate, the Andean
empire was formidably totalitarian in the organization of its
subjects’ lives. The Incas became the ruling caste of the empire, its
head becoming Sapa Inca – the `only Inca’. His rule was a despotism
based on the control of labour. The population was organized in units
of which the smallest was that of ten heads of families. From these
units, labour service and produce were exacted. Careful and tight
control kept population where it was needed; removal or marriage
outside the local community were not allowed. All produce was state
property; in this way agriculturalists fed herdsmen and craftsmen and
received textiles in exchange (the llama was the all-purpose beast of
Andean culture, providing wool as well as transport, milk and
meat). There was no commerce. Mining for precious metals and copper
resulted in an exquisite adornment of Cuzco which amazed the Spaniards
when they came to it. Tensions inside this system were not dealt with
merely by force, but by the resettlement of loyal populations in a
disaffected area and a strict control of the educational system in
order to inculcate the notables of conquered peoples with the proper
attitudes.’

Chicha was most commonly associated with maize, but other raw
materials could be used, for instance potatoes. The greatest diversity
in wild potato species occurs in the Lake Titicaca region of Peru and
Bolivia, where the now-familiar crop probably was domesticated between
10,000 and 7,000 years ago. According to Ellen Messer in The Cambridge
World History of Food, "In their Andean heartland, potatoes have
always been consumed fresh (boiled or roasted) or reconstituted in
stews from freeze-dried or sun-dried forms. They have been the most
important root-crop starchy staple, although other cultivated and wild
tubers are consumed along with cereals, both indigenous (maize and
quinoa) and nonindigenous (barley and wheat). Despite the importance
of the potato, cereals were often preferred. For example, Inca ruling
elites, just prior to conquest, were said to have favored maize over
potatoes, perhaps because the cereal provided denser
carbohydrate-protein-fat calories and also was superior for brewing."

According to scholar Patrick E. McGovern in his book Ancient Wine: The
Search for the Origins of Viniculture, `The discovery and rediscovery
of how to make a fermented beverage from a natural or derived source
of simple sugars has occurred in many places and at many times. Before
the modern period, only the Eskimos, the peoples of Tierra del Fuego
at the southern tip of South America, and the Australian aborigines
apparently lived out their lives without the solace and medical
benefits of alcohol. The polar regions lacked good resources for
monosaccharides; bear meat and seal fat may degrade and go rancid, but
they do not ferment. Temperate parts of the globe, by contrast, were
blessed with honey and fruit, above all the grape, and the tropics
were awash in sugar-rich plants.’

Exactly when humans first began making alcoholic beverages is not
known with certainty. A major turning point in human history was the
transition from an extractive economy (foraging and collecting) to a
productive, agrarian economy with domesticated plants and animals, the
so-called Neolithic Revolution, a term coined in the 1920s by the
Australian scholar Gordon Childe (1892-1957). This gradual transition
from the life of nomadic hunter-gatherers to more settled communities
of food producers happened independently in several parts of the
world, but very early (ca. 9000-7000 BC) in the Near East and the
Fertile Crescent, where many useful plants and animals were naturally
available. It is theoretically possible that alcoholic beverages could
have been made prior to this. Some raw materials of fermentation
(i.e. sources of sugar) were naturally available to pre-Neolithic
peoples, primarily wild berries and fruits, tree sap and honey. These
raw materials and end-products were unstable and not available for
consumption at all times of the year. However, it is unlikely that
reproducible beers could be brewed until after the invention of some
sort of pottery vessels. The earliest pottery containers we currently
know of were produced before 10,000 BC in China and Japan, somewhat
later in other regions.

In temperate zones there were relatively few abundant sources of
sugar. According to Hornsey, `Thus, for much of Europe, at least,
honey is the logical candidate for being the basis of the original
fermented beverage, some sort of mead. According to Vencl (1991), mead
was known in Europe long before wine, although archaeological evidence
for it is rather ambiguous. This is principally because the confirmed
presence of beeswax, or certain types of pollen (such as lime, Tilia
spp., and meadowsweet, Filipendula ulmaria), is only indicative of the
presence of honey (which could have been used for sweetening some
other drink) – not necessarily of the production of mead. For more
southerly parts of Europe, and for the Eastern Mediterranean and the
Near East, the fermentation of the sap and fruits of tree crops, such
as the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.), offers the most likely
means by which alcoholic drinks were first produced with any degree of
regularity. The date palm was one of the first fruit trees to be taken
into cultivation in the Old World (ca. mid-4th millennium BC), and its
sap and fruits contain one of the most concentrated sources of sugar
(60-70%) known on the planet.’

Moreover, as Hornsey states, `In more temperate zones, mature
specimens of trees such as birch (Betula spp.) and maple (Acer spp.)
were bored early in the year (January or February) and sap was
collected until the trees set bud. In early spring it has been
reported that a mature birch can yield some 20-30 litres of sap daily
(with a sugar content of 2-8%, plus some vitamins and minerals), some
of which can be stored until summer. Such activities are historically
attested for in North America, Scandinavia, and eastern Europe, and in
many instances it would appear that the sap was consumed `neat’….It
is thought that sap was more important than fruit juices in
prehistoric times, especially in northern Europe, something that can
be gleaned from the fact that the Finnish word for sap is mahla, and
that this gave its name to the month of March in both the old Finnish
and Estonian languages. The sugar levels of tree sap can be
concentrated by boiling, and it is of note that maple sugar was
manufactured in Europe until the early 19th century (and still is in
North America in the 21st century).’

Archaeologist Merryn Dineley claims that ritual brewing in Neolithic
ceremonies in Scotland dates back at least to 3000 BC. Meadowsweet,
the addition of which can extend the shelf-life of such early beer by
several weeks, was one component of a number of possible prehistoric
brews discovered in Scotland. This ale would have been flavored with
meadowsweet in the manner of a kvass made by various northern European
tribes, including the Celts and the Picts. We know of several ancient,
simply prepared fermented drinks that might have been precursors of
what we today know as beer. One of these is braga (or bosa), which has
been made until recent times over a huge area of Europe, from Poland
to the Balkans and eastwards into Siberia. Kvass or kvas is a
fermented beverage, typically with an alcoholic content as low as 1%,
which has been produced and consumed in Russia, the Ukraine and many
Eastern and Central European countries for a very long time, often
flavored with fruits or herbs. It may constitute a "fossil beer," and
there are those who believe that the beers consumed in early
Mesopotamian literate civilizations may have been a form of kvass.

Recorded human history begins with the rise of urban literate
civilization in Mesopotamia and the Middle East, starting with the
Sumerians and the cities of Uruk, Ur, Lagash and Kish in the fourth
millennium BC. These civilizations had access to barley and wheat,
which by consensus would be regarded as the preferred grains by most
brewers. The origin of wheat and barley is believed to lie in the
Fertile Crescent. Wild barley grew in Israel and Syria, the Jordan
Valley with the extremely ancient Neolithic town of Jericho via
eastern Anatolia to northern Mesopotamia and western Iran. Apart from
barley, all of the major cereal crops such as wheat, oats, rye,
millets, maize, sorghum and rice can and have been used to make
beer. Some of the oldest written texts in the world contain lists of
grains and ingredients for making beer. Sumerian Mesopotamia produced
a great variety of beers, most of which were probably weaker than the
European beers of medieval times. Wine was made in the Zagros
Mountains in Iran and imported to the main urban sites. Beer was a
popular drink in Mesopotamia during all eras and was consumed by all
social groups, interlinked with mythology, religion and medicine,
synonymous with happiness and a civilized life. Both filtered and
unfiltered beers were brewed in the region.

According to I. Hornsey, `Beer that had not gone through any sieving
or settlement phase was always drunk through straws, in order to avoid
gross sediment. Numerous cylinder seals have been recovered which show
individuals (usually two) drinking through straws from a communal
vessel, something that supports the notion that drinking beer was a
social activity….Drinking straws were usually made of reeds, and
hence have long since perished, but one or two elaborate and more
substantial structures have survived. Three such items were recovered
from a royal tomb at Ur. One was made of copper encased in lapis
lazuli; one was made of silver, fitted with gold and lapis lazuli
rings, and the third was a reed covered in gold, and found still
inserted in a silver jar. The silver tube was an impressive L-shaped
structure, being ca. 1 cm in diameter, and some 93 cm long. A number
of metal `straws’ have also been recovered from Syrian
sites. Unfiltered Mesopotamian beer, which was thick and cloudy, was
low in alcohol but high in carbohydrate and proteins, making it a
nutritious food supplement.’

Beer played an important role in the ceremonial life of ancient Egypt,
too. As Douglas J. Brewer and Emily Teeter state in their book Egypt
and the Egyptians, second edition, `The most popular drink in Egypt
was beer, and we assume that all Egyptians – rich and poor, male and
female – drank great quantities of it in spite of advice such as
`Don’t indulge in drinking beer, lest you utter evil speech, and don’t
know what you are saying’ (from the `Instructions of Ani’). Wages were
paid in grain, which was used to make two staples of the Egyptian
diet: bread and beer. Beer was made from barley dough, so bread making
and beer making are often shown together. Barley dough destined for
beer making was partially baked and then crumbled into a large vat,
where it was mixed with water and sometimes sweetened with date
juice. This mixture was left to ferment, which it did quickly; the
liquid was then strained into a pot that was sealed with a clay
stopper. Ancient Egyptian beer had to be drunk soon after it was made
because it went flat very quickly. Egyptians made a variety of beers
of different strengths.’

All kinds of workers were paid in grain and in grain products such as
beer and bread. People at all levels of Egyptian society drank beer,
with brewing not as tied to the temples as it was in Mesopotamia,
although there was some government interference and regulation here as
well. Breweries in ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia and Syria could be
large, but in the warm climate the beer would quickly become
undrinkable and could thus not be transported too far or exported to
distant regions. Baking and brewing often went on in shared quarters
on the estates of Egypt since these two processes involved the same
raw materials and similar equipment. Artistic evidence suggests a
strong link between brewing and bread-making, both being domestic
duties usually performed by women. Women made much of the beer in
medieval Europe, too, until brewing become a major, capital-intensive
industry and gradually became dominated by men. The roles of
microscopic organisms in baking and brewing, however, were not fully
appreciated until the scientific advances of nineteenth century
Europe.

Beer was also consumed by many other ancient peoples, including the
Hittites, Hebrews, Philistines, Thracians, Illyrians, Phrygians and
Scythians. Some peoples, like the Nubians and the Ethiopians, would
appear to have developed their own methods of brewing, making use of
indigenous raw materials. The Eskimos drank chiefly iced water and
warm blood before they were confronted by Europeans and their
alcoholic drinks.

Wine has frequently throughout recorded history enjoyed greater
prestige than beer and has often been the preferred choice of the
wealthy and the privileged. It is difficult to say why. Maybe it was
because wine was usually stronger than beer or that it kept longer. We
cannot say with certainty that it always tasted better. Regardless of
the reason for this, it is a fact that wine was often valued more
highly. This attitude arguably still exists today, when beer is often
viewed as the drink of the "common man," while those eating at
expensive restaurants will normally prefer a glass of fine wine rather
than a glass of beer to accompany their food.

Wine was widely consumed in the ancient Middle East, and sometimes its
effects were enhanced by additives. Along with eating and drinking
went song and dance. Egyptians and Mesopotamians found it difficult to
grow large amounts of grapes for wine and instead imported what they
could not make. Thousands of wine jars were deposited in the tombs of
the first pharaohs of Egypt at Saqqara (Memphis) and Abydos, the main
centers of the recently united country. The about 700 jars of wine
found in the tomb of one of Egypt’s first kings at Abydos, Scorpion I,
contain some of the earliest known hieroglyphic writing ever
discovered in Egypt, from before 3100 BC. This wine was apparently
imported from southern Palestine, and it is quite clear that there was
large-scale production of wine in the Levant – present-day Syria,
Lebanon, Israel and Jordan – already at this early date.

Nikolai Vavilov, a Russian botanist, has suggested that the first
"wine culture" emerged in Transcaucasia, the region stretching between
the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, comprising modern Georgia, Armenia
and Azerbaijan. Not all scholars agree with this theory, but it is
clear from archaeological evidence that the Black Sea region and the
Eastern Mediterranean contain some of the earliest wine-producing
regions in the world. The Phoenicians from present-day Lebanon brought
wine to new areas in Spain and Portugal, a number of Mediterranean
islands as well as Carthage, the Phoenician-derived North African city
which was to prove a serious challenge to the emerging Roman supremacy
in the Mediterranean world during the Punic Wars, especially under the
leadership of the great Carthaginian general and military strategist
Hannibal (ca. 247-ca. 183 BC).

The Phoenicians competed with and taught another wine-loving people,
the Greeks, as both groups plied their ships throughout the
Mediterranean, traded their goods and planted vineyards as they
went. One of the fruits of these contacts was the Greek – and by
extension the Roman or Latin – alphabet, adopted with added vowel
letters from a modified version of the early Semitic alphabet employed
by the Phoenicians before 1000 BC. Where the Greek alphabet was first
created is not clear, but it may well have been on some of the islands
where the ancient Greeks came into frequent contact with Phoenician
traders, for instance Cyprus or Crete, possibly around 800 BC. The
period from roughly 800 BC to 500 BC saw the establishment of Greek
city-states. By the time of Aristotle in the fourth century BC, Greek
colonies existed in southern France, the Iberian Peninsula, southern
Italy, Asia Minor and in what is now southern Russia and
Georgia. Krasnodar Krai on the Black Sea coast remains an important
Russian wine district to this day.

As scholar Nicholas Ostler puts it, `the colonisation of the
Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts by Greek cities lasted from the
middle of the eighth to the early fifth century BC. The question why,
of all the inhabitants of these shores, only the Greeks and the
Phoenicians set up independent centres in this way has never been
answered. The foundations clearly served a variety of purposes, as
political safety valves, as trading posts for raw materials, and as
opportunities to apply Greek agriculture to more abundant and less
heavily populated soil, but it is noteworthy that they are exclusively
coastal, never moving inland except on the island of Sicily. The Greek
expansion came after the period of Phoenician settlements (eleventh to
eighth centuries), so it may be that the most important factor was who
had effective control of the sea.’

The ancient Greeks and Romans were familiar with beer, but to them,
drinking alcohol above all meant drinking wine. Wine was
civilization. When Classical authors did mention beer, its most
beneficial property was considered to be its ability to soften ivory
to make jewelery. Beer was nevertheless consumed within the Roman
Empire, especially in the border regions in the north. Most of the
major wine producing regions in Western Europe today, and some of
those in Eastern Europe, were established by the Romans, including
probably the famous Bordeaux region of France. Wine production grew so
much that some provinces soon exported wine back to the Italian
Peninsula.

By the third century BC the Celtic world consisted of a series of
autonomous tribes stretching across much of Europe from Ireland to
Poland and Hungary, plus pockets of Celtic influence in Anatolia, the
Iberian Peninsula and elsewhere. After this, the Celts were more and
more under pressure by the advancing Romans and the Germanic
peoples. The loss of northern Spain and Italy, but especially France
(the Gaul) to the Romans was a serious setback, and the Celts of the
Danube soon disappeared. This left mainly the British Isles as a
Celtic repository. In Britain, the Celtic-speaking peoples were
eventually pressured into Ireland, Scotland (Calcedonia) and Wales. In
France, even the name `Gaul’ disappeared. It’s current name comes from
a post-Roman Germanic tribe, the Franks, although Celtic speech
survived in some northern regions such as Brittany (Bretagne in
French).

The standard container for wine, olive oil, grain and other
commodities in the ancient Mediterranean world was the amphora, a clay
vase with two handles. According to Julius Caesar, the Gauls in the
first century BC were happy to swap a slave for a 25-liter amphora of
wine. A slave would have been worth six times more in the Roman
marketplace. The amphora was eventually superseded by the wooden
barrel for the transport of wine.

As Hugh Johnson writes in his book The Story of Wine, `Wood and metal
were the Celts’ favourite materials. So skilful were they with roof
beams that some of the more ambitious of the stone vaults of Rome
could not have been achieved without Celtic carpenters to make the
templates. Iron wood-working tools have been found from the La Tène
culture of Switzerland in the fifth century BC which would be familiar
in a cooper’s shop today. The earliest barrels even had iron hoops,
which gave way to wooden encircling bands in Roman times, only to be
reinstated in the barrels of the seventeenth century. The historical
trend has been for barrels to become shorter and fatter – otherwise
there has been almost no change in form. The Romans soon realized the
superiority of the light, resilient, rollable barrel over the
cumbersome, fragile amphora, particularly in cooler northern climates
with high humidity. The one advantage of the amphora that the barrel
did not possess was that it could not be made airtight. Wood
`breathes’; wine cannot be `laid down’ to mature for years in a
barrel, as it can in an amphora.’

The Celts drank mead at certain great calendar festivals; otherwise
they primarily consumed beer. As Richard W. Unger writes in his
well-researched book Beer in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance:

`In the early fifth century, Orosius said that beer was the typical
drink of those living in the high plains of Spain and, in all
likelihood, the peoples of Celtic origin in that part of the Roman
Empire continued the practice of brewing throughout the Middle Ages as
did many others in the lands once ruled from Rome. Beer drinking was
identified with Germans, including those who lived on both sides of
the northern limits of Roman rule. The description of daily life among
Germans in Germania by the first-century Roman historian Tacitus gives
a documentary basis for the connection. A law of one German tribe, the
Alemanii, set a contribution of beer to be made annually to a temple,
so the drink may have had a religious function among the Germans.’

ANKARA: Population exchange proposal anachronistic, yet terrorizing

Today’s Zaman
23 August 2009, Sunday

Population exchange proposal anachronistic, but still terrorizing

Mümtaz Soysal

According to one man, there is a long-term plan to establish an
independent Kurdish state jointly designed by the United States,
Israel, certain Western groups and Kurdish nationalists, and an
element of this plan is the dissociation of Turkey’s southeastern
Anatolia region altogether with people living there in order to annex
this region to the soon-to-be-established state.

Also according to him, in line with the upcoming course of affairs
vis-à-vis the Kurdish issue in the country, `there will be a need
for drawing definite red lines against demands within the Southeast
that contradict the principles of the nation-state, such as regional
autonomy and education in a language other than the official language.
While highlighting the economic-social improvement, and eventually
there will be a need for proposing an exchange of the Turkmen
population in Iraq with those [Kurdish people in the Southeast] who
don’t want to obey these conditions.’
His name is Mümtaz Soysal, a former foreign minister and a
professor of constitutional law. Soysal has asserted that he has a say
not only in the lives of millions of Kurdish people living in Turkey,
but also in the lives of the Turkmen people in neighboring Iraq. His
view summarized above was reflected on Monday in his regular column,
published in the daily newspaper Cumhuriyet. His column’s title was
`Absolute Solution.’
In response to critics, Soysal later said he has never been a racist
person or a supporter of ethnic separatism. `There is a Kurdish state
being established just near us. Those who don’t want to live within a
republic that is respectful to ethnic rights but is not based on
ethical rights, let them go to that `Kurdish republic.’ We can’t keep
anyone here by force,’ he said. He was still assuming that he had a
say on the fate of the Kurdish people living in this country —
apparently as a leading figure of a camp that presumably owns this
country, unlike the Kurds.
The connotations of the phrase `population exchange’ are linked with
deeply held grievances on these lands, thus this is not solely a term
related to social engineering attempts, which are also common here.
The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, signed in the aftermath of the War of
Independence and after the Ottoman Empire came to an end, set in
motion a population exchange between Greek Orthodox citizens of the
young Turkish Republic and Muslim citizens of Greece, which resulted
in the displacement of approximately 2 million people.
The Armenian population that was in Turkey before the establishment
of Turkish Republic was forced to emigrate in 1915, and according to
some, the conditions of this expulsion are the basis of Armenian
claims of genocide.
Beside the still-ongoing political disputes concerning the forced
emigration of Armenians, both Greek and Turkish literary traditions
are still producing books explaining the grievances and homesick
feelings held by Greeks and Turks who were subjected to population
exchange. Those books also explain how those feelings have been
inherited by younger generations.
Legacy of `Ýttihat ve Terakki’
Admitting that even putting forth such a proposal in itself spells a
threat against Kurdish people or those who favor a broadening of the
fundamental rights of Kurdish people living in this country, lawyer
Sezgin Tanrýkulu, however, believes that such a proposal can find
no echo within the public.
`Soysal’s proposal reflects a mentality that leads to concerns, but
at the same time, it is not possible to explain or understand the
mentality through sensible arguments,’ Tanrýkulu, the Diyarbakýr
representative of the Turkey Human Rights Foundation (TÝHV), told
Sunday’s Zaman.
`This society still has certain traumas due to similar implementations
in the 1920s, and proposing such an implementation under the
circumstances of the 21st century is not acceptable. Fortunately, such
a proposal has no ground or support in the public, and it is not
implementable either,’ Tanrýkulu added, noting that he believed
that Soysal reflected a fascist view and such fascist views should not
be under protection of freedom of expression since they reflect a
stance that contradicts basic humanitarian values.
According to Kurdish author and politician Orhan Miroðlu, proposals
such as the one voiced by Soysal are not new and unfortunately have a
degree of support within the society.
`This is basically ethnic engineering, and it is a brainchild of
Ýttihat ve Terakki [the Committee of Union and Progress]. All of
the policies implemented by Ýttihat ve Terakki following 1915 are
reflections of this ethnic engineering,’ Miroðlu told Sunday’s
Zaman, referring to Ýttihat and Terakki’s ideology, which espoused
purifying all of Anatolia through a `Turkification’ of all its
segments.
`With its recent move toward resolving the Kurdish issue, I believe
that the ruling Justice and Development Party [AK Party] is playing a
historical role, no matter whether the results of this attempt will
eventually be found satisfactory or not by the Kurdish people. What
matters is the fact that they have attempted to change the dominant
mental structure within Turkey. In response, a camp symbolized by
Soysal and others has been terrorizing both Turkish and Kurdish people
with such proposals. Unfortunately they may succeed in finding a
response from within the society via this terrorizing impact,’
Miroðlu said.
He also sarcastically questioned whether Soysal was sure that Turkmens
in Iraq would be eager to come to Turkey, as they have been enjoying
certain cultural and political rights within the Kurdish regional
administration in northern Iraq.
A professor once
This is not the first time Soysal has astonished people with his
views. In February, he openly suggested that one’s expression of a
desire for a coup falls under `freedom of expression.’ He was speaking
within the context of a debate concerning suspects in the Ergenekon
investigation. Ergenekon is a clandestine terrorist organization
accused of plotting to overthrow the government by fomenting a coup.
Earlier, following the AK Party’s clear victory in the July 22, 2007
parliamentary elections, Soysal appeared on television and asked
publicly, `Do we have to wait another four years for this party to
leave?’
Seeing Soysal expressing such views was particularly painful to those
who once attended his constitutional law lectures at the Ankara
University faculty of political sciences, known as Mülkiye. The
courses were almost legendary, with high numbers of students flocking
to the classes to listen to this professor back the protection of
fundamental freedoms and rights under the constitution.
Baskýn Oran, a professor of international relations who also gave
lectures at the same faculty for decades, considers Soysal a symbol of
the sad situation of so-called leftist ideology within Turkey.
`When I look at the 1960s and ’70s, I see that we had actually been
defending Kemalist ideology in the name of being leftists. The holy
bridge between leftism and Kemalism was then anti-imperialism, and
some of us have unfortunately still remained committed to this
understanding,’ Oran told Sunday’s Zaman. `On the other hand, please
do not ask me how a well-informed professor of constitutional law like
Soysal can offer such a population exchange proposal.’
Instead, Oran gave an anecdote from his university years: It is 1968;
Oran and his friends chat and criticize a professor for still using
his lecture notes from 1951. The late Seha Meray, a professor of law,
approaches and chides them for their critical remarks against their
professor. `Some professors teach you how you should be, and some
professors teach you how you should not be,’ Meray tells Oran and his
friends.
`Back in the 1960s, Soysal somehow taught us how we should be, and
nowadays he is teaching us how we should not be,’ Oran concluded.

23 August 2009, Sunday
EMÝNE KART ANKARA

Armenia, Turkey to participate in NATO rescue training

News.am

Armenia, Turkey to participate in NATO rescue training
14:48 / 08/22/2009

In September Armenia and Turkey will participate in NATO rescue
training in Kazakhstan, Emergency Situations Department at Turkish
Government states, Turkish Cumhuriyet daily reports.
Training will take place in September 5-11, 2009 and involve U.S.,
Germany, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Armenia,
Russia, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Turkey and other countries.

Catholicos of All Armenians received congratulation letters

Aysor.am
22.08.2009, 12:18

Catholicos of All Armenians received congratulation letters

On August 21 His Holiness Karekin II, the Supreme Patriarch and
Catholicos of All Armenians, received a lot of congratulation letters
in Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin from state, political and public
officials and foreign ambassadors on his 58th anniversary.
On this occasion the RA President Serzh Sargsyan congratulated and
wished all the best to His Holiness.
On the occasion of the anniversary the RA NA president Hovik
Abrahamyan visited and congratulated Catholicos of All Armenians.
During the meeting the NA president handed His Holiness a Medal of
Honor for his contributions and achievements in Mother See of Holy
Etchmiadzin, in the spiritual life of Armenian nation, development of
the culture and self-protection of the nation.
In the same day in the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin the RA Prime
Minister Tigran Sargsyan, RA Governmental members, diocese leaders,
monks of Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin, prominent men of culture
congratulated His Holiness, informs information office of Mother See
of Holy Etchmiadzin.

Rostov Theater Presents Tigran The Great Performance To Bulgarians

ROSTOV THEATER PRESENTS TIGRAN THE GREAT PERFORMANCE TO BULGARIANS

Noyan Tapan
Aug 19, 2009

ROSTOV-ON-DON, AUGUST 19, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. Gorki
Dramatic Theater of Rostov-on-Don returned from Bulgaria last
week. The company of actors showed three comedies in the sister city of
Pleven. According to the Yerkramas newspaper of Armenians of Russia,
after the performances the Bulgarian friends gave a trip to Veliko
Tyrnovo to Rostov theater. "With those historic decorations we managed
to play three performances from our repertoire – Romeo and Juliette,
The Queen and certainly, Tigran the Great," Nikolay Sorokin, the Art
Director of Gorki Theater, said.

The newspaper reported that the premiere of Tigran the Great
performance staged by RF People’s Artist Nikolay Sorokin took place at
Rostov theater as far back as on October 26, 2008. Having the courage
to stage Ara Gevorgian’s Tigran the Great historic drama Rostov theater
decided to tell the 2000-year-old tragedy to its contemporaries.

In the period after the premiere Gorki Dramatic Theater delighted its
spectators with that performance not only in Rostov-on-Don, but also
during tours in various regions of Russia.

Kyrgyzstan – New "Coord Council on Struggle v Religious Extremism"

FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway

The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one’s belief or religion
The right to join together and express one’s belief

========================================== =======

Wednesday 19 August 2009
KYRGYZSTAN: WHAT WILL NEW "COORDINATING COUNCIL ON THE STRUGGLE AGAINST
RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM" DO?

Kyrgyzstan has established a state Coordinating Council on the Struggle
against Religious Extremism, Forum 18 News Service notes. The execution of
Council decisions will be obligatory for the different parts of the
government, but officials are unclear when asked by Forum 18 what they mean
by religious extremism and what the Council will do. It will be led by the
State Agency for Religious Affairs, the Interior Ministry and the NSS
secret police, and will have members from other parts of the government,
the Muslim Board, and the Russian Orthodox Church. Civil society and
religious organisations have reacted with concern, Raya Kadyrova of the
Foundation for Tolerance International pointing out that "unfortunately our
laws give a very wide definition of religious radicalism and extremism."
She suggested that the Collective Security Treaty Organisation might be a
reason for the Council. The Jehovah’s Witnesses said they needed to wait
and see what it would do. They noted that some officials have previously
described them as "a destructive movement," but "hoped" the Council would
not listen to such opinions. One Protestant asked why there was a need for
the Council, given the other responsible state organisations.

KYRGYZSTAN: WHAT WILL NEW "COORDINATING COUNCIL ON THE STRUGGLE AGAINST
RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM" DO?

By Mushfig Bayram, Forum 18 News Service <;

Kyrgyzstan has recently transformed its state Interagency Council on
Religious Affairs into a state Coordinating Council on the Struggle against
Religious Extremism, Forum 18 News Service has learned. However, although
the Council will apparently be powerful, uncertainty surrounds what it will
do.

The Decree establishing the Council – signed by Prime Minister Igor
Chudinov on 5 August – states that it was established "for the purpose of
ensuring concerted action and coordination of activity of State agencies
and local governments of Kyrgyzstan in prevention of the spread of and
resistance to religious extremism, fundamentalism and conflicts on
religious grounds". The Decree goes on to state that: "Constructive and
effective mutual relations between State agencies and religious
organisations aimed at efficient solutions of issues related to prevention
of the spread of religious extremism, fundamentalism, and conflicts on
religious grounds, will allow suppressing the ideas of various extremist
and destructive groups."

Kanybek Osmanaliev, Head of the State Agency for Religious Affairs, told
Forum 18 on 18 August that the Secretariat of the Council will be led by
himself, the Deputy Interior Minister, and the Deputy Head of the National
Security Service (NSS) secret police. The members of the Council will be
representatives of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Defence, Health,
Culture, and Finance, heads of Regional Administrations, as well as
representatives from the state-favoured Muslim Board and the Russian
Orthodox Church.

It appears that much power will be given to the Council, as the Decree
states that Council decisions must be executed by "Ministries, State
Committees, administrative units, and other executive authorities, as well
as local state administrations and local self-government".

What issues will the Council address?

"The reason for the decision was to turn the Interagency Council, which
was more of an amorphous structure to a more effective one to fight
religious extremism," Osmanaliev of the State Agency for Religious Affairs
told Forum 18. "We will meet no less than twice a year and report to the
Vice-Prime Minister," he said. The State Agency will be responsible for
preparing the agenda for each meeting. However, Osmanaliev said that he
"cannot say what exact issues we will discuss, as we are only in the phase
of formulating our policy." He also did not say what principles would serve
as the basis of the Council’s policy.

Father Igor Dronov of the Russian Orthodox Church in Bishkek told Forum 18
on 19 August that he is aware of the new Council, but has not yet accepted
the invitation to it. "I cannot say at the moment what issues the Council
will be occupied with," he stated. Reminded of his earlier complaints about
the activity of an earlier conversation with Forum 18 when he complained
about the activity of some Protestant Churches, Father Dronov said "that’s
not religious extremism but aggressive proselytism." The new Religion Law
bans – without defining – "aggressive action aimed at proselytism" (see
F18News 13 January 2009
< e_id=1240>). Asked if he would
bring these type of issues at the Council, Fr Dronov repeated his previous
answer that he did not know what the Council would be doing.

The Muslim Board and Osmanaliev of the State Agency have, along with Fr
Dromov, welcomed the restrictive new Religion Law. In a written explanation
of the "need" for a new Law – placed on the parliamentary website –
Osmanaliev expressed concern about what he described as the "abnormality"
of a rising number of people changing faith, especially young ethnic Kyrgyz
joining Christian churches. He also complained of "illegal" activity by
"various destructive, totalitarian groups and reactionary sects", among
whom he included the Hare Krishna and Mormon communities, and
"uncontrolled" building and opening of mosques, churches and other places
of worship (see F18News 2 October 2008
< e_id=1197>).

Who decided what the Council’s membership is?

Asked why representatives of other religious organisations were not
invited as members to the Council, Osmanaliev of the State Agency said the
question should be put to the government.

Suyun Musaliyev, who works for the department overseeing religious issues
in the Cabinet of Ministers, said that the members from the religious
organisations were proposed by the State Agency for Religious Affairs. "If
they [the State Agency] would like to propose a representative of
Protestants, for instance, they could," he told Forum 18 on 18 August. "We
will make a decision on their proposal."

What is religious extremism?

Officials were unspecific when asked what they meant by religious
extremism, and how the struggle against it would be carried out. "It is the
Coordinating Council’s duty to expose destructive and extremist religious
movements in the territory of Kyrgyzstan," Musaliyev of the Cabinet of
Ministers responded. Osmanaliev of the State Agency said that "only courts"
in Kyrgyzstan can decide which religious movements are extremist. "So far,
such decisions have been made on organisations like Hizb-ut-Tahrir" (see
< e_id=170> for an outline of this
group’s views), he stated. "None of the existing and registered
organisations are considered as extremists here," Osmanaliev assured Forum
18. He did not discuss the situation of unregistered organisations, or
those whose registration the new Law threatens.

Asked what would happen if names of existing organisations were claimed in
Council meetings to have negative effects, Osmanaliev would only said that
the Council "would need to make a collective decision" on cases of
extremism.

Reactions from civil society and religious communities

Raya Kadyrova, President of the Foundation for Tolerance International in
Bishkek, pointed to one possible problem in the Council’s work. She told
Forum 18 on 19 August that "unfortunately our laws give a very wide
definition of religious radicalism and extremism. For instance, any
criticism by independent Muslim organisations of the work of the Muslim
Board can easily be interpreted as radicalism and extremism." She also said
that she "hoped the Council will also listen to the opinion of Kyrgyzstan’s
so-called minority faiths before making any decisions affecting their
activity"

Various religious organisations expressed their concerns to Forum 18 about
the Council. A Protestant Pastor, who wanted to remain unnamed, said he
does not understand why there needs to be such a Council. "We already have
law-enforcement agencies in the country to detect who breaks the laws," he
told Forum 18 on 18 August from Bishkek. The Protestant added that the
State Agency is also supposed to work with religious organisations. "I am
afraid they are trying to tighten the noose around our necks," he
complained. He said he believed that the Council was created to "make life
hard" for the Protestant churches in the country.

Vladimir Gavrilovski of Jehovah’s Witnesses said they needed to wait and
see what the Council would do. "It has been re-organised very recently, so
we have to wait to see," he told Forum 18 on 18 August. "Some officials
have spoken about us as being a destructive movement in the past," he
noted. "When we explained our position on different issues, they told us
that they were given wrong information on us." He said he "hoped" that the
Council would not listen to such opinions.

Synarkul Muraliyeva (Chandra Mukkhi) of the Hare Krishna community said
she did not know what the position of the Council on their community would
be. "The NSS secret police has told us that we are a totalitarian sect, and
are in a list with the banned terrorist organisations."

Why is the Council being established?

Kadyrova of the Foundation for Tolerance International told Forum 18 that
the establishment of the Council was "official recognition that the
country’s security is under threat from religious extremism." She thought
that a reason for it’s establishment may be that the authorities "need to
determine" what the security threats are. She added that the Council may
also have been established "to integrate into national policy a policy
adopted at a recent meeting of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation
(CSTO)." She noted that "the policy of the CSTO is that special attention
needs to be given to religious radicalism and new religious movements, as a
threat to security in the region."

The CSTO, consisting of of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Russia, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, added some Muslim movements to its list
of terrorist and extremist organisations in May 2009. These included
Tabligh Jamaat and Salafism (see F18News 15 May 2009
< e_id=1297>), as well as
"Nurdzhular" – as it calls followers of the Turkish theologian Said Nursi.
Muslims who follow Nursi’s approach to Islam have been attracting
increasing state hostility in the former Soviet Union. Increasing numbers
of Muslims following his approach have been jailed in Uzbekistan (see eg.
31 July 2009 < 1333>).
Translations of many of his writings are banned in Russia, and those
thought to possess them have been raided (see F18News 16 July 2009
< e_id=1328>).

The Kyrgyz legal background

Since a repressive new Religion Law came into force in January, religious
communities of all faiths have experienced increased official hostility.
One example of this has been that unregistered communities of Protestant
Christians, Hare Krishna devotees and Ahmadiya Muslims in many parts of
Kyrgyzstan have been ordered by the authorities to stop meeting for worship
(see F18News 13 August 2009
< e_id=1336>).

Officials have claimed to Forum 18 that they have formed a Commission to
resolve three controversial provisions of the Religion Law: restrictions on
sharing faith and distributing religious literature, and the high threshold
of members required before religious communities can register. Separately,
a legal challenge to the Law was mounted by Protestants (see F18News 27 May
2009 < 1301>). The
Constitutional Court on 24 July dismissed the complaint, in a ruling signed
by Judge Chinara Musabekova. She stated that the "concrete constitutional
rights of the applicants have not been violated." (END)

For background information see Forum 18’s Kyrgyzstan religious freedom
survey at < 222>.

More reports on freedom of thought, conscience and belief in Kyrgyzstan
can be found at
< mp;religion=all&country=30>.

A survey of the religious freedom decline in the eastern part of the
Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) area is at
< id=806>, and of religious
intolerance in Central Asia is at
< id=815>.

A printer-friendly map of Kyrgyzstan is available at
< s/atlas/index.html?Parent=asia&Rootmap=kyrgyz& gt;.
(END)

© Forum 18 News Service. All rights reserved. ISSN 1504-2855
You may reproduce or quote this article provided that credit is given to
F18News

Past and current Forum 18 information can be found at

http://www.forum18.org/
http://www.forum18.org&gt
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?articl
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?query=&a
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/xpedition
http://www.forum18.org/
http://www.forum18.org/

Internet To Be More Available In Provinces

INTERNET TO BE MORE AVAILABLE IN PROVINCES

ARMENPRESS
Aug 18, 2009

YEREVAN, AUGUST 18, ARMENPRESS: The process of working out of document
on development of Information Technology in the Armenian provinces
is coming to an end and will be presented to the Vice Prime-Minister,
Territorial Administration Minister Armen Gevorgyan. Director of the
"Union of IT Enterprises" Karen Vardanyan told Armenpress that after
its discussion certain issues will be clarified after which meeting
will be organized with heads of companies of the union and governors’
offices.

He said companies of the union are ready to support, use their
experience in provinces for the development of IT there. The document
which will be presented to the vice prime minister includes issues
on availability and affordability of internet in the provinces, also
a suggestion on test program to be implemented in one community of
each province.

"Taking into consideration opportunities of a given community, our
means, we will ensure internet and make our services available for
the residents," K. Vardanyan said.

About 80% of internet users in Armenia are in Yerevan and only 20%
in provinces.

CIS Was No Longer Perspective For Georgia

CIS WAS NO LONGER PERSPECTIVE FOR GEORGIA

armradio.am
19.08.2009 16:37

"Georgia’s presence in CIS is of no vital importance for
Armenian-Georgian relations, just as its withdrawal from CIS makes no
significant change. Armenia will no more have a border with CIS state,"
Georgian affairs expert Haykazun Alvrtsyan told the journalists at
the press conference on Armenian-Georgian issues.

He considers that Georgia is ready to maintain bilateral relations with
CIS member-states and conclude a number of treaties. Seceding from
CIS, it remains a party to 75 (out of 113) multilateral agreements
within CIS framework, including those on economy, commerce, aviation
security and technical cooperation.

"Georgia is no longer significant for the West and U.S. The country
increased its instability rate and reconsidering priority programs,
tries to maintain cooperation with Armenia in economic, commerce and
communication fields," Alvrtsyan concluded.

The Earthquake Is Not Dangerous, But Buildings Are

THE EARTHQUAKE IS NOT DANGEROUS, BUT BUILDINGS ARE

Aysor.am
14.08.2009, 18:26

The earthquake itself is not dangerous, the buildings which crumble
are dangerous, and now the risks are increasing. It is the result
of urbanization, of constructing high buildings. Alvaro Antonyan,
the head of the National Seismic Protection Service of Armenia,
announced today at the press conference.

He introduced Vladimir Kossobokov, the leading specialist of
the International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and
Mathematical Geophysics in Moscow, Russia, scientist, member of
the National Academy of Science, RF, and professor of geodezia and
geophysics, who came here to make predictions as well as to learn
about the seismic situation here.

"We discuss the works realized in this sphere. We work on the
prediction of the earthquakes and this means where, when and with
what strength earthquakes will happen. Of course, this question is
not solved yet in the world",-said Alvaro Antonyan.

At the moment the National Seismic Protection Service is analyzing the
current seismic regime. There are more than 150 stations in Armenia and
NKR, and each 10 days the seismic danger is being estimated, as well
as the service is dealing with operative and short-term predictions.

But the Russian Institute of Earthquake Prediction is dealing with
the prediction of disastrous, long-term, up to 5 years, earthquakes.

"We fix the dangerous points on the earth where earthquakes
are possible. This Institute was founded on the initiative of
Garbaychov. The statistics prove that the predictions are true and
can be used. I am a mathematician and when the question concerns
predictions, I tell that predictions are possible during the year
but a fixed day cannot be mentioned",-said Kossobokov and added that
real prediction should include day, time and strength, as Antonyan
had already said.

He says that such predictions are impossible today, as the earthquake
decides what direction to take.

A. Antonyan also talked about the condition of the equipments in the
service, part of them is modern, and the other part is being used
for more than 20-25 years.

"There are worn-out equipments, but now we cooperate with French and
we agreed on implementing in Vayq new stations, which are present
and very modern", – Mr. Antonyan informed.

Vladimir Kossobakov insured that Armenia is the only country that
after the collapse of USSR kept the quality of providing seismic
service. "There are many problems in neighboring countries that do
not exist in Armenia", – he said.

Madrid Principles Contradict To The International Law

MADRID PRINCIPLES CONTRADICT TO THE INTERNATIONAL LAW

armradio.am
14.08.2009 17:14

"Madrid principles contradict to the international law and reduce
the negotiation process to a nonplus," is stated in the message of
Armenian Scientific Union of Moscow. The message consists of eleven
points. It states that the international society has to respect the
choice of NKR people based on international laws and referendums
passed in 1991 and 2006.

The authors of the message persist that the regulation of
Azerbaijani-Karabakhi conflict lasted over 100 year is dragging on.

"Azeri refuses any kind of concession, threatens regularly with war
and deranges the negotiation process," the message states. Members
of Armenian Scientific Union of Moscow think the nonplus in the
negotiations is connected with the fact NKR doesn’t participate in
negotiations in spite of being a legal participant.

The authors are sure "territories for status" is a completely wrong
principle and it won’t’ bring success to the process. "Only the final
recognition of NKR Independence may prevent a new aggression by the
Azerbaijani side. Only in this way we can achieve final reconciliation
between NKR, Azerbaijani and Armenian people".