Protocols Artificially Conceal Preconditions On Karabakh Issue, ARFD

PROTOCOLS ARTIFICIALLY CONCEAL PRECONDITIONS ON KARABAKH ISSUE, ARFD CLAIMS

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2009 22:20 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "The purpose of today’s meeting was to show Armenian
President that protest against Protocols is not organized by one or
several political parties only. That’s the protest of entire nation,"
ARFD faction’s secretary Artyusha Shahbazyan announced during a
meeting in Tsitsernakaberd. Serzh Sargsyan, he said, should listen
to people’s opinion. "Approving something not accepted by people will
mean acting behind their back," ARFD representative stressed.

He didn’t rule out possibility that Armenian people might
wake up one morning and learn that there are new Protocols on
Karabakh conflict. "We have stated several times that clauses of
Armenian-Turkish Protocols ‘artificially conceal’ preconditions on
Karabakh issue," Shahbazyan said.

"If we make concession now, Karabakh issue will come next, and that
will not be the end of all," he stressed.

Susie Kentikian: Although Sahin Is Undefeated, I Know My Job

SUSIE KENTIKIAN: ALTHOUGH SAHIN IS UNDEFEATED, I KNOW MY JOB

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2009 10:42 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian athlete, twice world champion in the "fly"
weight (up to 51 kg) among women professionals of WBA and WIBF Susanna
Kentikian (Killer Queen) on October 10 will defend her titles against
undefeated former World champion WIBF German Julia Sahin (20-0, 2
KOs). The Queen killer stated that although Sahin is still undefeated,
she knows her job and all will fight.

"I know my business. Now I have the experience of 10-round
fights. Julia is a very strong rival. Since our fight will take place
late at night I prepared in evening workouts, " boxing.de quoted
Susie Kentikian.

The coach of Susie Kentikian Mohammed Shaburov said, that her opponent
is really a strong rival. "Julia Sahin is a very strong athlete. She
won everything that could win. But we’re not asleep and ready to meet
with her," Mohammed Shaburov said.

Does a new treaty on European security have a future?

Does a new treaty on European security have a future?

00:1103/10/2009

MOSCOW. (Vladimir Ryzhkov for RIA Novosti) -At a recent UN General
Assembly in New York, President Dmitry Medvedev reiterated last year’s
proposal to draft and sign a comprehensive treaty on European
security.
In the last few years, Russia has been frustrated by the international
organizations in which it holds membership. They have been near idle,
as with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE), or have reduced their activities to what Moscow considers
interference in the internal affairs of Russia and other
countries. The Council of Europe and, again, the OSCE have been
monitoring elections, human rights, freedom of speech, etc.
These actions have been accompanied by NATO’s eastward expansion,
deployment of new weapons and renunciation of commitments under the
Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) (for instance, the
recently abandoned U.S. plan to deploy missile defense in Poland and
the Czech Republic). In Moscow’s opinion, these are attempts to
guarantee one’s own security at the expense of Russia and other
countries.
Russia cannot accept NATO’s claims to play the role of all but the
only guarantor of security in Europe, the OSCE’s reluctance to do
anything regarding the first and second "baskets", or the unilateral
policy of the United States, which has ignored not only the UN
Security Council, but often even its own allies in Europe in the last
few years.
Medvedev urged all concerned parties to draft and sign a legally
binding treaty based on the principle of indivisibility of security,
which would secure, in part, a commitment "not to guarantee one’s own
security at the expense of others." At a forum on international
security in Evian, France, he suggested that the parties of the
proposed treaty should assume the following commitments:
– reaffirm basic principles of security and interstate relations in
the Euro-Atlantic space;
– consider the use of force or its threat in international relations
unacceptab
qual security for all;
– not to allow any state or international organization to have an
exclusive right to the maintenance of peace and security in Europe;
– establish basic parameters for arms control and reasonable
sufficiency in the military strength.
These general principles suggest that Moscow wants the United States
and the West in general to give it legal guarantees on the following:
– cessation of NATO’s expansion towards Russia’s borders, primarily,
Ukraine and Georgia’s non-admission;
– renunciation of the deployment of new military hardware and
facilities in Europe, imposition of ceilings on armaments, which can
be changed only by agreement between the parties;
– legal and practical delimitation of the zones of responsibility (or
spheres of influence) between major security organizations in Greater
Europe – NATO, the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO),
OSCE and probably the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO);
– limitation of U.S. unilateral activity in the region, including in
those countries which Moscow considers its "sphere of vital
interests."
Speaking about the format of the new treaty, Medvedev suggested OSCE
modernization, vesting it with new authority. He believes it should
concentrate on the first "basket". In this case, as a pan-European
organization, which includes Russia, OSCE could break NATO’s emerging
monopoly, and pursue a uniform security policy in the entire
region. In other words, Medvedev suggested a Helsinki-plus agreement.
However, there are doubts that this most meaningful Russian initiative
in the last few years will find enough supporters and be carried out,
for a variety of reasons.
First, many countries do not share Moscow’s opinion on the
inadequacies of the existing security system. To the contrary, it
fully suits the majority (not only the United States, but most of the
European countries). Statements to this effect have already been made
by the U.S., EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and
Security Policy Javier Solana, and by other high-rankin
ctive use of existing mechanisms, such as the NATO-Russia Council,
OSCE, and a permanent dialogue between Russia and the European Union.
Second, it does not seem worthwhile to establish a new organization,
when members of the existing ones violate their commitments
(recognition of Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Russia’s failure
to comply with its commitments in the Council of Europe, NATO’s
unilateral actions, etc.)
The main problem is not the structure of these organizations but the
lack of trust and mutual understanding between their
participants. This often blocks decision-making in the UN Security
Council, paralyzes the OSCE, and the NATO-Russia Council, and
obstructs dialogue between Russia and the EU and in the Council of
Europe. Any new organization could also be paralyzed in much the same
manner.
Conclusion of a new treaty requires a consensus between all states of
the Euro-Atlantic region. Would it be signed by Serbia, Georgia,
Armenia and Azerbaijan without revising the decisions to recognize
Kosovo, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia, or without settling the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue? Are such a revision and such settlement
possible? Without these countries, and another dozen states with
unsettled grievances, how would a proposed new treaty be
comprehensive?
The new security treaty is unlikely to materialize. At the same time,
the discussion of its proposed provisions may be useful in specifying
the positions of the parties, in their consideration in practical
policy, in enhancing the effectiveness of the existing organizations
and formats of cooperation, and in establishing cooperation between
international organizations that never cooperated before (for example,
NATO, the CSTO, and the SCO). Such debates could facilitate an
elaboration of a much needed spirit of trust and mutual
understanding. Dialogue between Russia and the EU can play a key role
in this process. In 2003, they agreed to build a common security
space. It is essential to seal this agreement in the new Russia-EU
Treaty, which is now being d
yzhkov is a member of the presidium of the Council for Foreign and
Defense Policy, professor of the Higher School of Economics.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s and do not
necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

ICG: There Is Reason For Optimism In NKR Conflict Settlement Process

ICG: THERE IS REASON FOR OPTIMISM IN NKR CONFLICT SETTLEMENT PROCESS

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.10.2009 20:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia and Azerbaijan should endorse a document on
basic principles to end stalemate on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
by the end of the year, or they will face an eventual return to
full-scale hostilities.

Nagorno-Karabakh: Getting to a Breakthrough, the International Crisis
Group’s (ICG) latest policy briefing, examines the two-decades-old
conflict and concludes there is reason for optimism that the
political stalemate can be broken in today’s more supportive regional
environment. However, it also warns that both governments and the
international community must step up their efforts, as the status
quo is increasingly untenable.

"Although a deliberate military offensive from either side is unlikely
in the near future, the ceasefire that ended active hostilities
fifteen years ago is increasingly fragile", says Lawrence Sheets,
Crisis Group’s Caucasus Project Director. "There has been a steady
increase in the frequency and intensity of armed skirmishes that
could unintentionally spark a wider conflict".

The dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the territory of
Nagorno-Karabakh intensified following the breakup of the Soviet
Union in 1991. However, the two countries are now in substantial
agreement on the framework of basic principles first outlined by the
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group
in 2005. This framework revolves around three fundamental principles:
non-use of force, territorial integrity and self-determination.

As a first step to conflict resolution, Presidents Sargsyan of
Armenia and Aliyev of Azerbaijan must prepare their publics for a
possible peace deal. At present, there is a danger of a backlash,
especially among Armenians, that could derail any basic principles
agreement. After this agreement is signed, Nagorno-Karabakh’s de facto
authorities and the Nagorno-Karabakh Azeri representatives should
be part of subsequent peac ered format, including direct contacts
between Azerbaijan and Karabakh Armenians to help promote dialogue.

The international community, in particular the U.S., France and
Russia as co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, should intensify efforts
to encourage Armenia and Azerbaijan to formally endorse the basic
principles document and then open negotiations on a conclusive peace
accord. The co-chairs should take advantage not only of their own
productive collaboration, but also of current positive movement
towards Armenia-Turkey rapprochement.

"There are encouraging signs the sides are inching towards agreement",
explains Sabine Freizer, Europe Program Director. "But differences
still remain between Armenia and Azerbaijan on the specifics of a final
deal, most seriously over Nagorno-Karabakh’s final status, and there is
mutual distrust between the societies. Though a definitive settlement
may still be years away, this window of opportunity to make genuine
progress and support sustainable regional peace must not be missed".

Turkish PM: Armenia-Turkey Agreement Signature Not Dependent On Prog

TURKISH PM: ARMENIA-TURKEY AGREEMENT SIGNATURE NOT DEPENDENT ON PROGRESS IN KARABAKH TALKS

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.10.2009 11:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The signing of the agreement between Armenia and
Turkey wasn’t dependent on progress in Karabakh talks, Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said in an interview with The Wall
Street Journal.

Mr. Erdogan also pointed the two processes – a resolution of the
Karabakh conflict and rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia –
remain linked, and that a positive outcome at this week’s talks,
to be held in Moldova, would help overall.

The Turkish leader said the only obstacle to signing the deal Saturday
would come if Armenia seeks to alter the text. "This is perhaps the
most important point – that Armenia should not allow its policies to
be taken hostage by the Armenian diaspora," Mr. Erdogan said

Protocols Serve Interests Of Armenia? Prove It, Says Safaryan

PROTOCOLS SERVE INTERESTS OF ARMENIA? PROVE IT, SAYS SAFARYAN

Tert.am
06.10.09

"The protest actions are not emotional, people read and understand
very well. Prove that the Protocols serve interests of Armenia,"
Heritage Party parliamentary faction leader Stepan Safaryan said at
a press conference today. He had come to debate with Republican Party
of Armenia MP Karen Avagyan.

According to Avagyan, part of the Diaspora is for and the other part
is against the Protocols. And many of the protest actions taking place
outside Armenia are not sincere, since people are not even familiar
with the contents of the Protocols and they are only protesting based
on information presented to them.

Safaryan opposed Avagyan’s idea and is convinced that, especially
when speaking about those who have received a "western education,"
to say that they don’t understand the essence of the documents is
simply incorrect and offensive. Safaryan is convinced that the Armenian
president is faced with serious opposition outside the country.

Avagyan was annoyed that all political structures are for the
establishment of Armenian-Turkish relations and opening of the border,
but no one says how it should be implemented. "How else should it be,
that improvement?" Avagyan asked, posing a rhetoric question.

Ruben Gevorgian Will "Fill The Gap"

RUBEN GEVORGIAN WILL "FILL THE GAP"

ruben-gevorgyan
04:27 pm | October 05, 2009

Politics

After six-year silence Armenian parliamentarian, member of the
Prosperous Armenia Party (BHK) Ruben Gevorgian today was back to
Parliament.

"I want to fill a field where ideological, national and patriotic
issues are raised. Naturally, I want to serve my country and champion
the idea of making our homeland mighty and prosperous," Ruben Gevorgian
said to A1+.

"The National Assembly today lacks serious political figures who have
greatly contributed to the political sphere. They are away today for
some reasons," added Mr. Gevorgian.

Regarding the Armenian-Turkish Protocols, Mr. Gevorgian said: "I
support my team’s opinion. We are for the establishment of diplomatic
relations and opening of railways and motor-ways. Surely, we won’t
raise the issues if they affect the Karabakh conflict resolution and
the Genocide recognition."

http://a1plus.am/en/politics/2009/10/5/

Aznavour Welcomes Serzh Sargsyan’s Pan-Armenian Tour Initiative

Charles Aznavour Welcomes Serzh Sargsyan’s Pan-Armenian Tour Initiative

On the morning of October 2, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan met
with National Hero of the Republic of Armenia, world-renowned
chansonnier Charles Aznavour.

As announced by Armenia’s presidential press office, the eminent
composer highly praised the Armenian president’s initiative, in the
context of public discussions on the issue of establishing
Armenian-Turkish relations, to hear the opinions and approaches of our
Diaspora sisters and brothers; to dissipate existing concerns; and to
exchange thoughts on what Armenians all over the world will do in the
following phases of the process.

Obituary: Annie S. Karakaian

Newzjunky.com
October 2, 2009

Obituary
Annie S. Karakaian

WATERTOWN, N.Y. ‘ Annie S. Karakaian, 98, formerly of Sackets
Harbor, died early Friday morning at Angel’s Inn, Watertown, where she
had resided since January 2009.

A memorial service will be held 11 a.m. Friday, Oct. 9, at Fellowship
Baptist Church in Watertown with Rev. Earl Reff officiating. Burial
will follow at 1:30 p.m. in Rural Cemetery, Adams.

Arrangements are with the Piddock Funeral Home, Adams.

Born Oct. 1, 1911, in Constantinople, Turkey, the daughter of Kevork
and Armavanie Tateosian Sarafian, she and her family escaped the
Armenian Genocide and moved to the United States in 1922, where their
names are listed at Ellis Island.

She graduated from Detroit Michigan city school, and following the
Depression the family returned to New York City. At the age of 60, she
attended Queens College, where she earned her Bachelor of Arts,
graduating cum laude.

She married Aram Karakaian on July 15, 1933, in N.Y.C. The couple
lived in the Bronx before moving to Whitestone, N.Y. Mr. Karakaian
died in May 1991.

Mrs. Karakaian moved to live with her son and daughter in law, Edward
and Sharon Karakaian, Sackets Harbor, in August 2007 before moving to
Angel’s Inn in Watertown.

Surviving besides her son and his wife, are two sons and a
daughter-in-law, Charles Karakaian, NYC, John and Julie Karakaian,
Seville, Ohio; a grandson and his wife, Nicholas and Sarah Karakaian,
NYC; a brother, Harry Sarafian, San Francisco, Calif.; a sister, Eva
Exizian, Fla.; and several nieces and nephews.

Three brothers, Don, Al and John, all died before her.

Mrs. Karakaian enjoyed reading and painting portraits.

Donations in her memory made to the Activity Fund at Angel’s Inn, 518
Pine St., Watertown, NY 13601 or Hospice of Jefferson County, 425
Washington St., Watertown, NY 13601.

Pop Montreal: Diamanda Galas, a heart in the darkness

The Gazette (Montreal)

Pop Montreal: Diamanda Galas, a heart in the darkness

By Jordan Zivitz, The GazetteOctober 2, 2009

Diamanda Galás: Her deconstructions of blues, jazz and country
songs are backed by a deep awareness of traditional genres and the
compositions themselves.

Diamanda Galás: Her deconstructions of blues, jazz and country
songs are backed by a deep awareness of traditional genres and the
compositions themselves.
Photograph by: diamandagalas.com,

MONTREAL – Any discussion of Diamanda Galás begins with that
voice: swooping, shrieking, booming, cackling ` one of the most
radical weapons ever wielded by a singer.

Any discussion of that voice is followed by a discussion of the
political and social themes behind the Greek-American avant-gardist’s
complex, ritualistic, sometimes multilingual work: HIV/AIDS (the
blasphemy-blasted Plague Mass), torture and confinement (Schrei X),
genocide and its denials (Defixiones: Will and Testament).

So what happens if a listener’s awestruck reaction to Galás’s
vocal exorcisms eclipses awareness of her motivations?

`Well, I am a composer, which includes the musical interpretation of
poets and the meter each poet writes in my music,’ Galás wrote
in an email exchange with The Gazette. `I am also an interpreter of
songs from Greece, France, Belgium, America and other countries ¦
so sometimes individuals understand certain pieces of music and
sometimes they do not. Persons may appreciate the work on an emotional
and sonic level, or purely on a technical level, while the work leaves
them cold. I have no control over these things, of course. I can only
do what I feel at the time.’

Asked about plans for her piano-and-voice concert at Pop Montreal on
Saturday, Galás outlined an array of sources, summarized with
uncharacteristic understatement as `a wide repertoire’: `genocide
pieces using my own texts and texts from Armenian, Greek, Peruvian,
German, Belgian, French and Italian writers, set to my music’; Greek
love songs; amanethes (
elodies which are the basis for vocal improvisation’); Jacques Brel
compositions; and songs performed by Ã?dith Piaf, Juliette
Gréco, Ralph Stanley, O.V. Wright and Blind Lemon Jefferson.

`I had originally planned to title the concert Songs of Exile or
Prayers for the Infidel, and many of the songs can be described as
such, but I decided to be wider in my selection. Strangely, however,
all the songs have this feeling of isolation, of sadness, of mourning
to them. It is how life is sometimes, you know.’

Piaf and Stanley may not be typical touchstones for artists exploring
the outer limits, but nothing about Galás is typical. Her
deconstructions of blues, jazz and country songs are backed by a deep
awareness of traditional genres, and of the compositions themselves:
If you’ve heard her perform the gallows tale 25 Minutes to Go
(popularized by Johnny Cash), you’re acquainted with the final panic
and resignation of a death-row prisoner.

Galás twists the blues and jazz into such extreme permutations
that it seems reductive to classify her interpretations as
such. Still, `I do see myself when I sing the blues as a blues singer,
but an innovative blues singer, as John Lee Hooker was an innovative
blues singer, as Howlin’ Wolf was an innovative blues singer, as
Ornette Coleman was a blues musician as well as an avant-garde jazz
musician.’

The subject of vocalists’ originality sparked Galás’s pride,
rage and venomous wit: `I am the last singer on Earth people will ever
herald as a jazz singer, until after I am dead, and am one of the only
vocalists in the idiom who is an innovator. It is quite humorous.

`When I heard that (free-jazz singer) Patty Waters was not getting her
due, I lied and said that Patty Waters was my primary influence, even
though I only heard one song of hers twice ¦ because I was sick to
death of that pig Yoko Ono claiming that her one-note samba had
influenced every singer who managed to sing

after her birth, including me ` very amusing, since this woman could
not
roat and her ass. Thusly I wrote that `without Patty Waters, there
would be no Yoko Ono or Diamanda Galás,’ to punish Yoko, and
the press came to Yoko’s door demanding to know the influence of Patty
upon her. She deserved what she got. She is a lying, greedy
insect. One idea does not constitute a musical career. Twenty years of
multifarious ones does.’

Many of Galá’s ideas have been darker than dark, but there’s a
heart in the blackness. Critics viewing her fury and calls for revenge
as unremittingly negative are overlooking her fight for justice in the
name of outsider populations.

`Those persons who see `negative’ emotions as being `negative’ should
continue to protect themselves until their own bodies catch up with
them. then they will know. Whether or not by then it is too late for
them to understand the true constituents of life, among which is
unquestioned empathy, is not my concern.’

Click here to read the full email exchange between Diamanda Galas and
Jordan Zivitz.

Diamanda Galás performs Saturday, Oct. 3, 2009 at 9 p.m. at
Outremont Theatre, 1248 Bernard Ave. W., with Jerusalem in My Heart,
as part of Pop Montreal. Tickets: $35. 514-908-9090;

Galás also gives a free lecture titled Updating the Plague and
the Mass: Were You a Witness? on Thursday, Oct. 1, 2009 at 6 p.m. at
Concordia University, Room H-110, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W.,
co-presented by Pop Montreal and the university’s HIV/AIDS Lecture
Series; visit aids.concordia.ca.

Pop Montreal takes place Wednesday, Sept. 30, through Sunday,
Oct. 4. For more Gazette coverage, plus links to a schedule and map,
go to The Gazette’s Festival Central site. For coverage during the
fest, we’ll have you covered on the Words & Music blog.

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

www.ticketpro.ca.