BAKU: Norway Officials Visit Azerbaijan

NORWAY OFFICIALS VISIT AZERBAIJAN

Azerbaijan News Service
Aug 31 2005

The official Oslo attaches great significance to issues related to
holding fair and transparent elections in Azerbaijan, the Norway’s
state secretary Kim Trovik stated on 31 August on arrival in Baku,
Trend reports. Kim Trovik noted, the purpose of the visit is
development of the Azerbaijani-Norwegian cooperation, discussion
of regional issues, in particular, the Nagorno-Karabakh problem
settlement and implementation of regional projects. He reminded, the
Norwegian “Statoil” is one of the largest investors into the oil and
gas sector of Azerbaijan, voicing the hope, that bilateral economic
relations will develop also in future. As for the Norway’s stance on
the forthcoming parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan, Trovik noted,
the official Oslo attaches great significance to issues, related to
holding parliamentary elections in conformity with the international
standards. Commenting on the position of the Norwegian government on
the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the Minister noted,
“Norway supports the efforts of the OSCE Minsk group and stands for
continuation of peace talks”. “The official Oslo is rather optimistic
and hopes, the meetings of Presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia will
bring positive results in the end”, the Minister underscored.

“Holding democratic elections is one of the commitments assumed by
Baku for the Council of Europe and other international organizations.

Undoubtedly, results of the voting are the sovereign choice of the
people of Azerbaijan. However, we stand for all candidates to create
equal conditions”, Trovik said, reminding, 6 short-term and 3 long-term
observers will be involved in the monitoring of the elections. Touching
upon the issue of implementation of the project for supporting the
South Caucasus states, performed by the Norwegian government together
with UNDP, the diplomat noted, that within the project Azerbaijan,
Armenia and Georgia will be allocated totally 10 million of USD
till the end of 2007. “One third of this amount will be given to
Azerbaijan”, Trovik noted, adding thanks to development of cooperation
between Oslo and Baku large investments were made in the Azerbaijan’s
economy. “For today, the government of Norway elaborates a number of
new joint projects in regard to Azerbaijan”, the state secretary said,
noting that joint cooperation presupposes implementation of programs
in the development of democratic institution, energy projects, as well
as measures on support of refugees and internally displaced persons.

The CIS: The end of the road?

THE CIS: THE END OF THE ROAD?
Sergei Blagov 8/29/05

EurasiaNet, NY
Aug 29 2005

The Commonwealth of Independent States appears near the end of its
existence. Even if the organization does survive, it will do so in
a significantly different form, political analysts say.

Established amid the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, the CIS
has largely failed to fulfill its potential as an institution for
the promotion of closer political and economic links. Many member
states have been unable to set aside concerns that Russia, the
organization~Rs dominant partner, wants to use the CIS as a vehicle
for the preservation of Moscow~Rs influence in the former Soviet
space. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. As a result,
agreements among member states routinely went unimplemented.

Following the latest CIS summit, held August 26 in the central Russian
city of Kazan, Russian President Vladimir Putin said the organization
still had a future. But even Putin had to admit that the CIS, as
currently constituted, is dysfunctional. “The issues related to the
modernization of CIS bodies are extremely difficult,” Putin told a
news conference.

Summit participants approved an array of documents, including a
protocol on border cooperation and measures to address illegal
migration in the coming years. The CIS also threw whatever
organizational weight that it has behind Kazakhstan~Rs bid to gain the
rotating chairmanship of the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe.

On the summit~Rs sidelines, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan held
talks aimed at reaching a political settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. Officials
from both countries have been tight-lipped about the substance of
recent discussions, known as the Prague process.

However, an Armenian presidential aide was quoted by the Mediamax
news agency as saying the two-hour meeting in Kazan was a “positive
development.”

Turkmenistan, meanwhile, garnered attention by downgrading its formal
affiliation with the CIS. Mercurial Turkmen leader Saparmurat Niyazov,
who skipped the summit, attributed the move to Ashgabat~Rs “status
of permanent neutrality.” One commentary, published in the Russian
daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta, characterized Turkmenistan~Rs move as the
“beginning of the CIS~Rs collapse.”

Putin advocated the creation of a council of “wise men” to develop
ideas for the reorganization of the CIS. “We have different positions
and we are trying to find mutually acceptable proposals through
dialogue in order to the turn CIS into effective tool for cooperation,”
Putin said.

Russia~Rs stance toward the CIS has been undergoing a reevaluation for
much of 2005. In March, Putin talked publicly about the CIS acting
as a vehicle for a “civilized divorce” among member states. Yet,
by May, when Moscow hosted a CIS summit to coincide with festivities
marking the 60th anniversary of Victory Day, Putin was again urging
CIS participants to strengthen cooperation.

Before the Kazan summit, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
suggested that Russia~Rs relations with former Soviet republics
should undergo changes. “We should be building our relations on the
basis of international norms,” Lavrov said at a news conference after
meeting fellow CIS foreign ministers. “As market reforms proceed in
our countries, we will be increasingly basing our intergovernmental
and economic relations on world practices.”

Analysts interpreted Lavrov~Rs remarks as a sign that Moscow will now
start linking economic assistance to CIS members — especially in the
form of subsidized energy supplies — to their allegiance to Kremlin
foreign policy. Earlier in August, Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory
Karasin bluntly stated, in comments published by Rossiiskaya Gazeta,
that Russian leaders needed to devise new aid strategies that better
protected Moscow~Rs geopolitical position. “Russia cannot put up with
a situation in which it delivers energy resources at loss-making
prices — effectively subsidizing the economies of those countries
— but the people there remain hungry,” Karasin said. “It is such a
situation that creates fertile ground for [color] revolutions.”

Karasin was referring to the recent revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine
that brought to power pro-Western leaders. [For background see the
Eurasia Insight archive].

In recent years, Russia has tried to diversify its regional political
and economic interests, seeking to develop other multilateral
organizations, including the Eurasian Economic Commonwealth and the
Collective Security Treaty Organization. [For additional information
see the Eurasia Insight archive]. In February 2003, the leaders
of Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan agreed to establish a
so-called Common Economic Space group (CES) to harmonize economic
policies and trade legislation. Like the CIS, however, the CES~Rs
future is now in doubt, given that Ukraine, one of the four members,
appears unenthused about strengthening economic tries with Russia.

During the Kazan summit, Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko said
that his country would not withdraw from the CES. But he stressed that
Kyiv would participate in CES activities only in a way that does not
contradict Ukraine~Rs main goal of integrating with the European Union.

CES leaders held a separate summit August 27 and reportedly pledged to
continue multilateral cooperation. Ukraine, though, declined to sign
any agreements involving the possible establishment of “supra-national”
institutions. Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan pledged to sign a package
of 29 agreements by December 1 and an additional 15 agreements by
March 2006. The RIA Novosti news agency reported that Ukrainians
expressed interest in signing only 15 of the 29 agreements due to be
finalized by late this year. Even so, Putin expressed “satisfaction”
with the outcome of the CES summit.

Editor~Rs Note: Sergei Blagov is a Moscow-based specialist in CIS
political affairs.

On this day – Aug 29

Advertiser Adelaide, Australia
The Mercury, Australia
Melbourne Herald Sun, Australia
Aug 29 2005

On this Day – Aug 29

1990 – Armenia’s parliament declares emergency rule, bans nationalist
paramilitary group and blocks roads around republic’s capital.

1533 – Spanish conquistadors give Atahuallpa, last emperor of the
Incas, the choice of being burned at the stake or converting to
Christianity. He converts and is garrotted the same day.
1756 – Frederick II of Prussia invades Saxony, marking start of Seven
Years’ War.
1792 – At least 900 die when the British warship Royal George sinks
at Spithead while repairs are being carried out just below the
waterline.
1793 – The French commissioner Leger-Felicite Sonthonax, facing a
slave army and a British invasion, declares all slaves free in Haiti.

1842 – Anglo-Chinese war ends with Treaty of Nanking, confirming the
ceding of Hong Kong to Britain.
1874 – French performer Blondin walks tightrope across Sydney
Harbour.
1882 – English cricketers lose to Australia on English soil for the
first time – a mock obituary in the Sporting Times then declares the
death of English cricket, saying its ashes will be taken to
Australia, the origin of the “Ashes” trophy.
1885 – First motorcycle, built by Gottlied Daimler in Germany, is
patented.
1935 – Queen Astrid of Belgium is killed in car accident in
Switzerland.
1943 – Danish warships are scuttled at Copenhagen in World War II
uprising against Nazis.
1944 – 15,000 American troops march down the Champs Elysees in Paris
as the French capital continues to celebrate its liberation from the
Nazis.
1960 – Jordanian prime minister Hazza El-Majali and 10 others are
assassinated by a time-bomb.
1964 – Roy Orbison releases the song Pretty Woman.
1965 – US astronauts Gordon Cooper and Charles Conrad make safe
landing in Atlantic after a record eight days of orbiting around
Earth.
1966 – Beatles play their last live concert to a crowd of 25,000 at
Candlestick Park, San Francisco.
1972 – North and South Korean Red Cross officials meet in North Korea
openly for first time to discuss reuniting divided families.
1975 – Death of Eamon de Valera, three times Ireland’s prime minister
and president from 1959-1973.
1987 – Death of Academy Award-winning US actor Lee Marvin, aged 63.
1990 – Armenia’s parliament declares emergency rule, bans nationalist
paramilitary group and blocks roads around republic’s capital.
1991 – Soviet lawmakers suspend Communist Party activities nationwide
and freeze its bank accounts because of party’s role in failed coup
attempt.
1992 – The last Russian diplomats pull out of Kabul, ending a decade
of involvement in Afghanistan.
1995 – Georgian leader Eduard Shevardnadze survives an assassination
attempt when a car explodes near his motorcade.
1996 – A Russian plane carrying coal miners to work at a remote
arctic island smashes into a mountain top, killing all 41 people
aboard in the worst air disaster on Norwegian soil.
1997 – The Japanese Supreme Court rules the government acted
illegally when it deleted from a history textbook references to
Japan’s deadly experiments on Chinese during World War II.
1998 – A Cuban airplane bursts into flames and crashes during takeoff
from Quito, Ecuador, killing 79 people.
1999 – East Timorese overcome fears of violence to vote in a historic
referendum on independence from Indonesia.
2000 – Six former hostages released after months in captivity in the
Philippines arrive in Libya. The Libyan government took the lead in
negotiations to win their freedom from Muslim rebels.
2001 – A US federal grand jury indicts three executives of a Marin
County electronics firm, based in California, accusing them of
illegally selling equipment to India that could be used to make
nuclear weapons.
2002 – Michael Skakel, a member of America’s politically prominent
Kennedy family, is sentenced to 20 years to life in prison for the
1975 murder of neighbour Martha Moxley.
2002 – Marconi finally agrees to hand over the sputtering business to
its creditors, leaving shareholders of the former British industrial
champion with next to nothing.
2003 – A large car bomb explodes outside the Imam Ali Mosque in
Najaf, Iraq. The explosion killed at least 80 people, including
Ayatollah Mohammed Bakir al-Hakim, a top Shiite Muslim cleric.
2004 – Greece stages an exuberant closing ceremony to bring the
curtain down on the Athens Games, which took the Olympics back to
their roots and provided drama right down to the last gold medal.

Hrant Matevosian’s Stories Translated Into Persian

HRANT MATEVOSIAN’S STORIES TRANSLATED INTO PERSIAN

TEHRAN, AUGUST 25, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. A collection of
stories “Old Mountains Under Open Air,” “Green Field,” “Orange Mare”
by Hrant Matevosian were published in Persian translation. Seyfollah
Golkar from Iran translated the stories from French. According to the
“Alik” daily, the Armenian original of Matevosian’s works was first
translated into Russian, then into French, however, owing to pedantry
of the translator of Persian, aesthetic nuances of Matevosian’s
literary style were completely secured, by what we got a successful
model in translation for acquainting a Persian language reader with
modern Armenian prose literature.

NCI Starts Examining Violation of Property Rights in Armenia

PRESS RELEASE
The National Citizens’ Initiative
75 Yerznkian Street
Yerevan 375033, Armenia
Tel.: (+374 – 10) 27.16.00, 27.00.03
Fax: (+374 – 10) 52.48.46
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:

August 24, 2005

National Citizens’ Initiative Starts Examining Violation of Property Rights
in Armenia

Yerevan–The National Citizens’ Initiative (NCI) today convened the first of
its roundtable series on “Human Rights, State and Communal Necessities.” The
meeting brought together policy makers, lawyers, jurists, analysts, experts,
media representatives, and some former residents of Yerevan’s Kentron
district whose ownership rights have been breached while implementing
Yerevan’s construction investment plan.

NCI coordinator Hovsep Khurshudian welcomed the audience with opening
remarks and wished the participants fruitful work, while stressing this
matter’s importance for the Armenian society and the state. “The institution
of a market economy in Armenia is unimaginable without property rights. It
is impossible to build democracy without human rights, including the
recognition, respect, and defense of ownership privileges. Consequently,
when the possessions of the citizen of the Republic of Armenia is being
alienated, that must occur exclusively within the frameworks of honoring
human rights, the laws of the Republic of Armenia, and international
approaches and norms. Our task today is to examine the legality and grounds
for the property alienation of hundreds of families previously living in
downtown Yerevan. From that vantage point, by taking into account the
fortune threatening Kond, the area near the wine factory and other
neighborhoods, and the similar procedures that have gotten underway in
different communities of Yerevan, in the city of Vanadzor and elsewhere, the
alienation of the estates of former dwellers of Lalayants, Pushkin, Buzand,
Aram, and other streets, therefore, is not the final serious test for us
all,” Khurshudian said.

The opening remarks were followed by NCI’s 10-minute “no comment” video
clip, which aims to apprise the public roundtable participants of the
essence of the problem, from the infringements upon ownership rights to
protests and public operations for the protection of personal rights, all of
which have been met with either the authorities’ silence and apathy, or
insufficient answers.

And in order to obtain explanations for the unanswered questions,
representatives from the corresponding authoritative bodies were also
invited to the event. The first roundtable on alienation of property started
with a policy intervention by Armen Tadevosian, a specialist from the staff
of Armenia’s ombudswoman. According to him, the human rights defender’s
office is dealing with this matter for a long time now. In the department’s
2004 report, there is an expansive reference made to the violation of the
rights of former residents of those areas in the Kentron community that have
been declared construction zones. In the words of Tadevosian, Armenia’s
ombudswoman has made attempts to get explanations from related structures.
In the face of the authorities’ harsh resistance, however, these efforts
were sometimes unproductive. Armen Tadevosian even recalled the time when
the president of Armenia had appealed to the Constitutional Court, whereupon
the defender of human rights was accused of intervening in the rule of law
and meddling in the affairs of jurisprudence. Despite all these, the
evaluation by the ombudswoman’s office is that what has taken place and that
which is occurring now is “a blatant violation of our citizens’ ownership
and other economic rights” and that “the City Hall is not taking into
consideration the rights of the land user or the proprietor.” Tadevosian
noted that “in the case when there is no adopted law on real estate that is
included in the alienation belt of Yerevan’s construction projects, when the
owners do not agree with alienation, then the government of the Republic of
Armenia is not empowered to adopt such resolutions.” He also declared that
the ombudswoman’s office has exhausted all measures toward the protection of
human rights, and that it would come out with an extraordinary report that
would call on the people to petition the MPs in their constituencies, and
encourage them to join the National Assembly’s signature campaign. Perhaps
in this way, it might be possible to make the Constitutional Court take up
the matter.

Vice-chair of the “Bureau for the Carrying out of Yerevan’s Construction
Investment Plans” state organization Samvel Papikian and the specialist from
the same office, Gagik Martirosian, pointed out that the alienation of
people’s property in the name of state needs is taking place legitimately,
and that it is based on the government’s resolution #950, adopted on October
5, 2001, which relates to “the confirmation of the order for the purchase,
offering a purchase price, and usage of land and real estate located in
Yerevan’s Northern Avenue and other alienation belts of the city of
Yerevan,” and decision #909, reached on June 17, 2004, which relates to
“allocating unauctioned land for the purpose of implementing construction
investment plans in the areas acquired for state necessities, in order to
engage in urban development projects in the main avenue of the city of
Yerevan.” According to Papikian and Martirosian, “the government itself has
defined state needs and the zones for usage, and the agency is bringing
those decisions to life.”

As mentioned by the lawyers, jurists, and legal advocates participating in
the roundtable, the purchase and acquisition of land and real estate in this
territory were accompanied by severe violations. First, Article 8 of the
Republic of Armenia’s Constitution stipulates that “the right to property is
recognized and protected in the Republic of Armenia,” and then, in
accordance with Article 28, “the owner may be deprived of private property
only by a court in cases prescribed by law. Private property may be
alienated for the needs of society and the state only under exceptional
circumstances, with due process of law, and with prior equivalent
compensation.” The state has not verified in any way as to how allowing
private companies the opportunity to make investment proposals and to gain
profits from newly-built structures is linked with state necessity. What are
“state needs?” How exceptional are the property alienation cases? Why is the
person being compelled to “vacate his own home?” Why is he being obliged to
“conform” to the contract’s content and sum of the compensation, etc.? None
of these is defined. Both the lawyers and residents agree that the
compensation amount does not correspond to the value of the property.
Accordingly, it cannot satisfy the proprietor, especially when the allocated
compensation cannot cover the cost of an apartment in similar or even worse
condition in the same area. This procedure also conflicts with Section 1 of
the 1st Protocol of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and
Basic Freedoms, which requires consideration of the right of property.

The next two policy interventions referred to the legal defense of ownership
rights. Member of Armenia’s Barristers’ Union Arthur Grigorian talked about
“the upholding of the standards for fair trial ‘in the cases of alienating
the property of citizens for state needs.'” The lawyer who has taken part in
numerous hearings in that respect maintained that the legal breaches were
blatant and many.

In his turn, director of the legal firm “Right,” Vahe Grigorian, pointed out
many violations of the right for legal protection, which he and his clients
had confronted during the court defense of property rights. “The affixation
of property alienation under exceptional cases in the Constitution perhaps
is not enough to dispossess the person from that right. The citizen’s
consent is very important,” Grigorian noted.

The two men also underscored that when it comes to protecting transgressed
rights, the courts’ dependency on Armenia’s executive authority has become a
very serious issue. Numerous residents have already exhausted the internal
avenues of court defense, and a number of cases now have been forwarded to
the European Court of Human Rights. They further added that at the court,
the representatives of the authorities are not able to point to a state need
that validates the people’s deprivation of their belongings en masse. And
from the very beginning, there was not even a construction plan or any
architectural document prior to this procedure. Vice-chair of the “Bureau
for the Carrying out of Yerevan’s Construction Investment Plans” state
organization Samvel Papikian and the specialist from the same office Gagik
Martirosian mentioned that there was a blueprint.

During the debates, it became apparent that one of the painful issues in
this process was tied to the understanding of the precept of “with due
process of law” that the society and legal advocates retain on the one hand,
and the state maintains on the other. Since they are deprived of the
opportunity to appeal to the Constitutional Court for the violation of their
constitutional rights, Armenia’s citizens are also dispossessed of the
chance to dispute the government’s resolutions in court. Consequently, the
resolution of this matter meets an impasse, and remains hanging on either
the National Assembly, the President, or the political will and wishes of
the government itself. For now, however, this is lacking.

NCI coordinator Hovsep Khurshudian stated that extensive infringement upon
property rights have made the preparation of the summary report an urgent
matter. “In the upcoming months, the NCI will come up with a tri-lingual
review, which will be presented for public attention and discussion during
one of the following roundtables,” Khurshudian furthermore informed.

The remainder of the session was devoted to exchanges of views and policy
recommendations among the public figures and policy specialists in
attendance. Noteworthy were interventions by MP Vardan Mkrtchian; Armenian
Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS) research coordinator
Stiopa Safarian; Ruzan Khachatrian of the People’s Party; Edgar Hakobian of
the “Heritage” Party; NCI legal advisor Lusine Shahmuradian; “Institute of
Culture and National Values” NGO chairwoman Armine Gasparian; a number of
specialists from the Armenian ombudswoman’s staff; head of the “Victims of
State Needs” civil initiative Vachakan Hakobian and a group of former
residents of the Buzand, Lalayants, Aram, and Pushkin streets who are
members; and many others.

The National Citizens’ Initiative is a public non-profit association founded
in December 2001 by Raffi K. Hovannisian, his colleagues, and fellow
citizens with the purpose of realizing the rule of law and overall
improvements in the state of the state, society, and public institutions.
The National Citizens’ Initiative is guided by a Coordinating Council, which
includes individual citizens and representatives of various public,
scientific, and educational establishments. Five commissions on Law and
State Administration, Socioeconomic Issues, Foreign Policy, Spiritual and
Cultural Challenges, and the Youth constitute the vehicles for the
Initiative’s work and outreach.

For further information, please call (37410) 27-16-00 or 27-00-03; fax
(37410) 52-48-46; e-mail [email protected]; or visit

www.nci.am
www.nci.am

Special dept of Prosecutors Office puts up Fight Against Corruption

AZG Armenian Daily #149, 24/08/2005

Home

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE PUTS UP FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION

To be more productive in its fight against corruption, the Chief
Prosecutor’s Office of Armenia set a special anti-corruption department on
June 30 of 2004. “Hakastver” NGO organized yesterday a meeting entitled
“Authorities of the Prosecutor’s Office In Fight Against Corruption” to
discuss the work of the department during last 8 months. During this period
of time the department having only 8 employees opened 5 criminal cases,
restarted 1 unfinished case and received 100 citizens. The criminal cases
had to deal with bribery in diverse state institutions, particularly
land-survey agency. The head of the department urged citizens to be more
active in helping corruption fighters disclose criminals.

By Gohar Grigorian

Wine Spectator magazine

In the Mountains of Karabakh

A war-ravaged former Soviet region tries to recover its winemaking
roots

By Matt Kettmann
>From Wine Spectator magazine, June 15, 2005 issue

A skinny sprig of Khindogny grapevine, freshly plucked from warm and
nourishing soil, is clinging to life on a short knob of rootstock.
The sprig, growing inside a dark barn where the smoky air is pierced
by rays of light shining through walls riddled with bullet holes,
symbolizes hope for the future of the isolated and war-torn region
known as Nagorno-Karabakh.

Stuck in geographic and political limbo between Christian Armenia and
Muslim Azerbaijan, Karabakh’s ethnic Armenian population is trying
to revitalize the ancient traditions of winemaking that were almost
destroyed by a bloody war for independence from Azerbaijan in the
early 1990s.

As he spins the sprig of Khindogny, a variety traditional to the high
southern Caucasus Mountains, Vladimir Zakiyan’s eyes well up with
tears. He speaks in a village called Kheramot, which was destroyed
during the war and occupied by Azeri soldiers for nearly two years
before being liberated by Karabakhi troops. “We started from zero,”
says Zakiyan. “This village lost 31 young men and had a lot of people
injured. It was destroyed to the ground. … We started to rebuild
our lives. Everybody can destroy, but not everybody can rebuild.”

Inside the formerly bombed-out barn in Kheramot, where wood fires keep
the temperature warm to accommodate early vine sprouting, Zakiyan shows
how the Karabakh grape shoots are being spliced onto rootstocks from
the United States that are resistant to phylloxera. The voracious
root louse has recently devastated native Karabakh grapevines and
threatens to eliminate entire strains of endemic grape varieties.

But the young vine represents a collaboration-of foreign aid and
local perseverance-that could eventually put the region back on the
world wine map. The boisterous in-country director of the Fresno,
Calif.-based nonprofit Armenian Technology Group (ATG), Zakiyan
is aware that the struggle has just begun. “It’s not a time to be
proud,” he reminds the local villagers. “Our reconstruction is still
in progress. But maybe in some time, we’ll be proud.”

But pride is strong among Armenians, an ancient people who, in the
early part of the fourth century, became one of the first to proclaim
Christianity as a national religion. An Armenian tale recounts how
the biblical Noah walked down from the slopes of nearby Mount Ararat,
where the Ark had come to a rest after the Great Flood, and ventured
into what is today Armenia, where he planted the seed of the world’s
first vineyard. In so doing, he established the lands between the
Black and Caspian seas as a winemaking epicenter.

One of the region’s viticultural fonts is called Artsakh by the
Armenians, who have populated its remote, mountainous terrain for
the past two millennia. Situated in the misty mountains of the South
Caucasus, Artsakh is an ancient place of both natural beauty and almost
constant war. Farmers of this bucolic enclave became adept at growing
high altitude-friendly varieties in fertile soils at some 3,600 feet.

Local lore has it that the people of Artsakh-benefiting from a climate
cooler, wetter and more variable than that of their more arid lowland
neighbors-were known to produce the best fermented grape juice around
and to keep barrels and jugs full even during the repeated invasions
of Turks, Mongols, Persians and Russians.

In the 1920s, the Soviets took control. The mostly Armenian
Artsakh-officially renamed Nagorno-Karabakh, which translates to
“mountainous black garden”-was separated from Armenia as a result of
Stalin’s machinations, becoming part of Azerbaijan. In the following
decades, grapes from the mountainside vineyards of Karabakh supplied
the Soviet Union with red wine and brandy. Eventually, 14 wineries
made wine from the 200,000 tons of grapes harvested annually.

All of that changed in 1991. With the Soviet Union in its death
throes, the mostly Armenian population of Karabakh voted to become
independent. War between Azerbaijan and Karabakh (backed militarily
by Armenia) quickly ensued. For three years, the battles raged,
killing close to 30,000 soldiers and civilians and ravaging the
countryside. Agricultural fields, including acre upon acre of
grapevines, were destroyed or left unusable due to unexploded ordnance
and mines.

Though 1994 brought a cease-fire, it did not bring closure. The war
is officially unresolved, and the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic sits in
international limbo as diplomatic talks continue. Following the war,
the economy collapsed. It looked as if one of the world’s first major
winemaking regions was lost forever, a doom hastened by the onset of
phylloxera in the late ’90s, which nearly finished the job the war
had begun.

But Armenian pride wouldn’t let that happen. Today, as the future of
Karabakh is debated by the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan as well
as ambassadors from the United States, France and Russia, grapevines
are growing once again.

The road to Karabakh’s wine country mirrors the reality faced by the
struggling republic: It’s uphill and rocky once you leave Stepanakert,
the slow-paced capital of Karabakh. It traverses a breathtaking
landscape whose features range from snowcapped peaks to rolling
pastures in luminous shades of green. It can be hard to remember
that one wrong step could prove deadly, inasmuch as many meadows are
minefields and the seemingly quiet villages are littered with shrapnel.

About an hour’s drive from Stepanakert, the road passes the relatively
bustling town of Karmir Shuka, which means “red market” in Armenian. At
one end of town stands an impressive steel gate adorned with an
oversize cast-iron cluster of purple grapes. How fitting: It’s the
entryway to the wine- and spirit- processing plant owned and operated
by Karabakh Gold, one of only two alcohol-producing companies still
operating today.

This gritty factory is no wine boutique, and visitors-especially
non-Armenians-are few. Yet the workers proudly relate the history of
the factory, which was founded in 1927 to process mulberry wine (a
celebrated elixir in the region) and was operational as a producer of
various spirits, wines and brandies until the war began. It reopened
after the 1994 cease-fire and managed to maintain production until
1998, when the postwar economy faltered and phylloxera hit.

This downward spiral speaks to the dramatic decline of grapegrowing in
the entire region over the last two decades. In the 1980s, Karabakh
had more than 42,000 acres of vineyards. Today, the total acreage
under vine is less than 3,000, and grape harvests are down to less
than 5,000 tons.

In 2002, Karabakh Gold’s investors purchased the factory and took
advantage of the new government’s economic policies, which provide
investment incentives and tax breaks as the means of invigorating
a stagnant economy still under blockade from both Turkey and
Azerbaijan. Production started again after extensive repairs, with 400
tons of grapes-namely a white Georgian variety called Rkatsiteli and
the domestic red grape Khindogny-collected from neighboring villages.

In 2003, the company began cultivating wheat to make vodka, which now
constitutes most of Karabakh Gold’s output, and expanded production
to include pomegranate wine, blackberry wine and the traditional
mulberry blend. Most promising was Karabakh Gold’s signing in 2003
of a contract to sell grapes to the Yerevan Brandy Company, which is
owned by the large French firm Pernod Ricard.

The new bottling plant for Karabakh Gold is a few dozen miles away
in Martouni, separated from that district’s war-ravaged capital
of the same name by a large minefield. Inside, the very busy Vladik
Alibabyan-who graduated nearly 20 years ago from Yerevan’s Agricultural
Academy with a specialty in winemaking-plays consummate deal maker,
constantly barking orders to his various assistants and jabbering on
his cell phone.

Between sips of the semisweet white Rkatsiteli and of the dry, jammy
red Khindogny, which he prefers with barbecue, Alibabyan explains that
last year, only 3,000 tons of grapes were processed by Karabakh Gold,
but the goal is to reach 20,000 tons soon.

“We aren’t being controlled by the number of grapes,” he explains,
visibly frustrated that he sells exponentially more vodka than fine
wine. “It’s the market demand.” But with the involvement of Pernod
and the marketing potential of the rare and tasty Khindogny grape,
Alibabyan is confident that the balance will shift.

Karabakh’s only other winemaker represents the sort of collaboration
that could lift the region out of its current depression. It’s a
partnership between the Karabakhi-owned company Artsakh Alco and
Zakiyan’s California-based ATG. Artsakh Alco is headquartered
just a few miles east of Stepanakert in the town of Askeran, a
community framed by an ancient fortress that has repelled numerous
invasions-including Azeri advances in the most recent war-and survives
as a symbol of Karabakh’s strength.

Like Karabakh Gold’s factory, Artsakh Alco’s facilities-initially
constructed in Stalin’s era and rebuilt around 2000, with production
beginning in 2001-aren’t finely polished. Yet the science of wine is
taken seriously here, where lab coat-wearing technicians work under
the watchful eye of winemaker Karian Akopian. She, like Karabakh
Gold’s Alibabyan, graduated from the Agricultural Academy in Yerevan,
the capital of Armenia.

Artsakh Alco makes a variety of alcohols, but Akopian, like Zakiyan,
is most interested in making quality wines. When provoked, they each
rattle off an impressive list of traditional Karabakh grape varieties,
ranging from Khindogny to Haghtanak, a red whose name translates to
“victory,” and Kagun, a white. Artsakh Alco does not make any sweet
wines, both in deference to Akopian’s tastes and because they don’t
sell well.

During the war, the front lines were little more than a mile away, and
Askeran was regularly shelled. The oak barrel-making factory next to
the Artsakh Alco plant was a tank-repair warehouse, so it’s no wonder
that hollowed husks of Russian tanks still sit behind the property. But
these days, the imported technology on the premises consists of Italian
bottling equipment, German hardware and French filters, all acquired
in the company’s determined attempt to produce the best Karabakh wines.

East from Askeran, toward the current front lines, where sniper
fire is often exchanged between young Azeri and Karabakhi troops,
Zakiyan-flamboyant in a bright yellow shirt and grape-cluster bolero
in a land stylistically dominated by plain black suits-oversees ATG’s
grapegrowing operations in Kheramot.

These young vines are then sold at half-price to villagers-around
50,000 were sold last year-or planted by ATG employees from Kheramot
in a site once vineyard, then minefield, now vineyard again. The ATG
vineyard was cleared by the Halo Trust, a British nonprofit involved
in mine- and bomb-removal projects across the republic. Unfortunately,
the ATG vineyard is a rarity; most of the cleared vineyards are being
turned into wheat fields because, as one Halo Trust officer put it,
“You can’t live off wine.”

Zakiyan oversees an ATG winery in nearby Chartar as well. When fully
operational, it will likely become the face of Karabakh wine for the
growing number of tourists.

Yet even as the sun begins to shine on Zakiyan and his colleagues
through the region’s thick fog, nature is unrelenting. The 2004
crop was almost totally destroyed by an unexpected spring frost,
with temperatures dropping to 28° F in April. Close to 80 percent
was lost. Will they bother picking the rest or just call the harvest
a total loss?

“We will pick the grapes no matter what,” says a smiling Zakiyan,
his optimistic spirit as formidable a force as the weather and the
constant challenges that hamper him and his countrymen. “The future
of Karabakh is in good wine production. It’s our national tradition.”

Matt Kettmann is the pop culture editor for the Santa Barbara
Independent and a freelance correspondent for Time magazine. He
journeyed to Nagorno-Karabakh last spring.

–Boundary_(ID_DsCNnefZpJhi6d3mQwMEAQ)–

BAKU: Visit of PACE president to Southern Caucasus countries started

Today.az, Azerbaijan
Aug 19 2005

Visit of PACE president to Southern Caucasus countries started
yesterday

19 August 2005 [11:11] – Today.Az

The president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
(PACE) Rene Van Der Linden will be on a visit in the Southern Caucasus
countries on August 18-23.

APA was informed about it from the CE Information Office in Baku.

This is the first visit of Rene Van Der Linden to the Southern
Caucasus region after he was elected the president of the organization
in January.

The PACE president arrived in Yerevan today will be in this country
till August 20. He will conduct meetings with the Armenian president
Robert Kocharyan, chairman of the parliament Artur Bagdarsaryan,
minister of foreign affairs Vardan Oskanyan, Minister of Justice David
Arutunyan, and representatives of NGOs and opposition. His meeting with
the Catholicos of all Armenians II Garagen was also planned. The main
questions to be discussed are the process of constitutional reforms,
regulation of the Upper Garabagh conflict, democratic reforms and
pluralism.

Rene Van Der Linden will be on the visit in Georgia on August 20-21.

He will meet with the prime-minister Zurab Nogaydeli, vice-chairman
of the parliament Mikhail Machavariani, oppositionist representatives
represented in the parliament and representatives of the public.

Besides, the meeting of the PACE head with the patriarch of Georgia
second Iliya was also planned. The constitutional situation,
independence of the courts, freedom of gathering and speech, and
press pluralism will be mainly discussed in the meetings.

Rene Var Den Linden will be in Baku on August 21-23. It is intended
that he will conduct meetings with the president Ilham Aliyev, chairman
of the parliament Murtuz Alasgarov, prime-minister Artur Rasizade,
minister of foreign affairs Elmar Mammadyarov and representatives of
NGOs, opposition and mass media. His meeting with the sheikh of the
whole Caucasus Haji Allahshukur Pashazade is also planned.

The parliamentary elections to be held in November, political
prisoners and Upper Garabagh conflict will be the priority questions
among the topics to be discussed during his visit to Azerbaijan. A
press-conference will be held at the end of the visit.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/20443.html

BAKU: Aliyev:”Unlike Armenia, the position of Azerbaijan in the talk

Ilham Aliyev: “Unlike Armenia, the position of Azerbaijan in the
talks process was always unchanged”

Today.Az, Azerbaijan
Aug 20 2005

20 August 2005 [10:18] – Today.Az

“The talks held till now were ineffectual. We know this, at the
same time, we still hope. As long as there is hope, the talks will
be continued”.

This was told by the president Ilham Aliyev in his talk with the
journalists when expressing his attitude to the upcoming Kazan meeting
of the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia.

According to the words of the president, the international public began
to express unambiguous attitude to the question in the result of the
works conducted during the recent years: “Putting this question into
discussion in the international organizations shows that the Nagorno
Karabkah conflict is the focus of attention.

Decisions adopted in connection with this question reflect the
reality”. The head of the state expressing his attitude to the
question of holding a referendum in Nagorno Karabkah noted that all
possibilities are used for solving the conflict peacefully.

According to the words of I.Aliyev, unlike Armenia, the position of
Azerbaijan in the talks process was always unchanged. The president
repeated once again that the lands of Azerbaijan must be released
from occupation, internally displaced people must return back to their
homeland; security of Armenians in Nagorno Karabakh must be guaranteed.

The head of the country stressing once again that the “Prague process”
intends the solution of the conflict in stages said that at first the
lands must be released for it and then talks should be continued:
“The economic potential and international influence of Azerbaijan
is higher than those of Armenia. Armenia must take this reality
into consideration and know that separatism is out of place in the
globalizing world”.

/APA/

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/20421.html

BAKU: Serious progress made in talks with Armenia – Azeri leader

Serious progress made in talks with Armenia – Azeri leader

Turan news agency, Baku
19 Aug 05

Ismayilli, 19 August: Serious progress has been made in the talks on
the settlement of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict, however, it does not
give us full assurances for a peace agreement, Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev has told journalists.

Evaluating the prospects of the forthcoming meeting between the
Azerbaijani and Armenian leaders in Kazan (Russia) on 23 August,
he admitted that there are still “serious differences” between the
sides. Nevertheless, unlike Armenia Azerbaijan’s position remains
unchanged. This position was put forward in the first meeting with
the Armenian president in Geneva back in late 2003. Azerbaijan’s
stand is that the occupied territories should be liberated, internally
displaced persons should return to their native land, ethnic Armenians
in Karabakh can receive a high degree of self-administration and
their security can be guaranteed.

Aliyev said that the “Prague process” envisages this option of
settlement, which is also called a “stage-by-stage” solution. The
occupied territories should be liberated and refugees should return
first and then talks on the status of Nagornyy Karabakh should start.
Moreover, these talks can be held without any time limit.

“No decision contradicting the will of the Azerbaijani people will
be made,” Aliyev said. The country’s territorial integrity will never
be a subject of discussion, he stressed.

Weighing the chances for a breakthrough in the settlement process,
Aliyev said that all the factors work for Azerbaijan. The country’s
military potential is rising at a high pace and Armenia cannot compete
with Azerbaijan in this respect.

Azerbaijan’s position is in line with modern processes going on in the
world, while Armenia’s stance is a leftover from the past, Aliyev said.