Rome: If Washington asks Ankara to take stock of its past

Corriere della Sera, Italia
March 5 2010

If Washington asks Ankara to take stock of its past

by Antonio Ferrari

History, which is almost always written by the winners, can sometimes
cause embarrassment and spark a desire to revise it. Sometimes history
really does inspire fear, particularly when it clashes with the
interests of realpolitik. The US Congress’s Foreign Affairs Committee
approved a resolution yesterday recognizing the genocide of the
Armenian people in the early part of the last century. A crisis so
serious has broken out between age-old allies Turkey and the United
States that Ankara has even recalled its ambassador.

The fact that the motion was put forward by the committee chairman, a
Democrat who belongs to the same party as Barack Obama, is fuelling
tension in Washington, anger in Ankara, and satisfaction in Yerevan.
The problem is quite simple in its complexity: Turkey, which has set
in motion negotiations with Armenia with a view to normalizing
bilateral ties, is also the United States’ most important ally in an
area stretching from the Balkans, to the Middle East, and to the
Caucasus. Now Congress’s vote is in danger of triggering a diplomatic
and political earthquake. While Ankara has taken a few timid steps
towards overcoming what it considers to be a taboo – the genocide of
1.5 million Armenians – it has already warned that the resolution is
going to freeze the normalization process with its neighbouring
country and cast a shadow over its alliance with the United States.
The effort made by Hillary Clinton to urge prudence on Congress, and a
phone call between Obama and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul have
not managed to prevent the crisis, which looks set to be a
particularly thorny one.

Of course it is bizarre, as a Republican Party member said, that
Germany has acknowledged its responsibility for the Sho’ah, that South
Africa is probing the crimes of apartheid, and that the United States
accepts its guilt in connection with what the native Americans
suffered, while Turkey obstinately continues not to want to come to
terms with its past. Sarkozy’s France, which recognized the Armenian
genocide, paid a high price in contracts that went up in smoke, but
now with the United States the consequences are unpredictable.

[translated from Italian]

US House Foreign Affairs commmittee resolution 252

Azg, Armenia
March 6 2010

U.S. HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE RESOLUTION 252

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 252

Calling upon the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the
United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity
concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and
genocide documented in the United States record relating to the
Armenian Genocide, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 17, 2009

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. KIRK, Mr.
BERMAN, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. WAXMAN,
Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. WATSON, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr.
SENSENBRENNER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. WU, Mr. SIRES, Mr. DANIEL
E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Ms. ESHOO,
Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. WEINER, Mr. HONDA, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr.
WALZ, Mr. PETERS, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. COSTA, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. FRANK of
Massachusetts, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. WOLF, Mr.
MARKEY of Massachusetts, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr.
LIPINSKI, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr.
HIMES, Mr. BACA, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. MCGOVERN,
Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. FATTAH, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SPACE, Ms. DELAURO, Mr.
RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. LANCE, Ms.
LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. OLVER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. DAVIS of
Illinois, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms.
TITUS, Mr. STARK, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. TSONGAS,
Mrs. TAUSCHER, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. DREIER, Mr. NUNES, Mr. TONKO, and Mr.
TIERNEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Calling upon the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the
United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity
concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and
genocide documented in the United States record relating to the
Armenian Genocide, and for other purposes.

Resolved,

SHORT TITLE

Sec. 1.

This resolution may be cited as the `Affirmation of the United States
Record on the Armenian Genocide Resolution’.

FINDINGS

Sec. 2.

The House of Representatives finds the following:

(1) The Armenian Genocide was conceived and carried out by the Ottoman
Empire from 1915 to 1923, resulting in the deportation of nearly
2,000,000 Armenians, of whom 1,500,000 men, women, and children were
killed, 500,000 survivors were expelled from their homes, and which
succeeded in the elimination of the over 2,500-year presence of
Armenians in their historic homeland.

(2) On May 24, 1915, the Allied Powers, England, France, and Russia,
jointly issued a statement explicitly charging for the first time ever
another government of committing `a crime against humanity’.

(3) This joint statement stated `the Allied Governments announce
publicly to the Sublime Porte that they will hold personally
responsible for these crimes all members of the Ottoman Government, as
well as those of their agents who are implicated in such massacres’.

(4) The post-World War I Turkish Government indicted the top leaders
involved in the `organization and execution’ of the Armenian Genocide
and in the `massacre and destruction of the Armenians’.

(5) In a series of courts-martial, officials of the Young Turk Regime
were tried and convicted, as charged, for organizing and executing
massacres against the Armenian people.

(6) The chief organizers of the Armenian Genocide, Minister of War
Enver, Minister of the Interior Talaat, and Minister of the Navy Jemal
were all condemned to death for their crimes, however, the verdicts of
the courts were not enforced.

(7) The Armenian Genocide and these domestic judicial failures are
documented with overwhelming evidence in the national archives of
Austria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Russia, the United States,
the Vatican and many other countries, and this vast body of evidence
attests to the same facts, the same events, and the same consequences.

(8) The United States National Archives and Record Administration
holds extensive and thorough documentation on the Armenian Genocide,
especially in its holdings under Record Group 59 of the United States
Department of State, files 867.00 and 867.40, which are open and
widely available to the public and interested institutions.

(9) The Honorable Henry Morgenthau, United States Ambassador to the
Ottoman Empire from 1913 to 1916, organized and led protests by
officials of many countries, among them the allies of the Ottoman
Empire, against the Armenian Genocide.

(10) Ambassador Morgenthau explicitly described to the United States
Department of State the policy of the Government of the Ottoman Empire
as `a campaign of race extermination,’ and was instructed on July 16,
1915, by United States Secretary of State Robert Lansing that the
`Department approves your procedure . . . to stop Armenian
persecution’.

(11) Senate Concurrent Resolution 12 of February 9, 1916, resolved
that `the President of the United States be respectfully asked to
designate a day on which the citizens of this country may give
expression to their sympathy by contributing funds now being raised
for the relief of the Armenians’, who at the time were enduring
`starvation, disease, and untold suffering’.

(12) President Woodrow Wilson concurred and also encouraged the
formation of the organization known as Near East Relief, chartered by
an Act of Congress, which contributed some $116,000,000 from 1915 to
1930 to aid Armenian Genocide survivors, including 132,000 orphans who
became foster children of the American people.

(13) Senate Resolution 359, dated May 11, 1920, stated in part, `the
testimony adduced at the hearings conducted by the sub-committee of
the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations have clearly established the
truth of the reported massacres and other atrocities from which the
Armenian people have suffered’.

(14) The resolution followed the April 13, 1920, report to the Senate
of the American Military Mission to Armenia led by General James
Harbord, that stated `[m]utilation, violation, torture, and death have
left their haunting memories in a hundred beautiful Armenian valleys,
and the traveler in that region is seldom free from the evidence of
this most colossal crime of all the ages’.

(15) As displayed in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
Adolf Hitler, on ordering his military commanders to attack Poland
without provocation in 1939, dismissed objections by saying `[w]ho,
after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?’ and
thus set the stage for the Holocaust.

(16) Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term `genocide’ in 1944, and who
was the earliest proponent of the United Nations Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, invoked the Armenian case as a
definitive example of genocide in the 20th century.

(17) The first resolution on genocide adopted by the United Nations at
Lemkin’s urging, the December 11, 1946, United Nations General
Assembly Resolution 96(1) and the United Nations Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of Genocide itself recognized the Armenian
Genocide as the type of crime the United Nations intended to prevent
and punish by codifying existing standards.

(18) In 1948, the United Nations War Crimes Commission invoked the
Armenian Genocide `precisely . . . one of the types of acts which the
modern term `crimes against humanity’ is intended to cover’ as a
precedent for the Nuremberg tribunals.

(19) The Commission stated that `[t]he provisions of Article 230 of
the Peace Treaty of Sevres were obviously intended to cover, in
conformity with the Allied note of 1915 . . ., offenses which had been
committed on Turkish territory against persons of Turkish citizenship,
though of Armenian or Greek race. This article constitutes therefore a
precedent for Article 6c and 5c of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Charters,
and offers an example of one of the categories of `crimes against
humanity’ as understood by these enactments’.

(20) House Joint Resolution 148, adopted on April 8, 1975, resolved:
`[t]hat April 24, 1975, is hereby designated as `National Day of
Remembrance of Man’s Inhumanity to Man’, and the President of the
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day as a
day of remembrance for all the victims of genocide, especially those
of Armenian ancestry . . .’.

(21) President Ronald Reagan in proclamation number 4838, dated April
22, 1981, stated in part `like the genocide of the Armenians before
it, and the genocide of the Cambodians, which followed it–and like
too many other persecutions of too many other people–the lessons of
the Holocaust must never be forgotten’.

(22) House Joint Resolution 247, adopted on September 10, 1984,
resolved: `[t]hat April 24, 1985, is hereby designated as `National
Day of Remembrance of Man’s Inhumanity to Man’, and the President of
the United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day as a
day of remembrance for all the victims of genocide, especially the one
and one-half million people of Armenian ancestry . . .’.

(23) In August 1985, after extensive study and deliberation, the
United Nations SubCommission on Prevention of Discrimination and
Protection of Minorities voted 14 to 1 to accept a report entitled
`Study of the Question of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide,’ which stated `[t]he Nazi aberration has unfortunately
not been the only case of genocide in the 20th century. Among other
examples which can be cited as qualifying are . . . the Ottoman
massacre of Armenians in 1915-1916′.

(24) This report also explained that `[a]t least 1,000,000, and
possibly well over half of the Armenian population, are reliably
estimated to have been killed or death marched by independent
authorities and eye-witnesses. This is corroborated by reports in
United States, German and British archives and of contemporary
diplomats in the Ottoman Empire, including those of its ally
Germany.’.

(25) The United States Holocaust Memorial Council, an independent
Federal agency, unanimously resolved on April 30, 1981, that the
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum would include the Armenian
Genocide in the Museum and has since done so.

(26) Reviewing an aberrant 1982 expression (later retracted) by the
United States Department of State asserting that the facts of the
Armenian Genocide may be ambiguous, the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia in 1993, after a review of documents
pertaining to the policy record of the United States, noted that the
assertion on ambiguity in the United States record about the Armenian
Genocide `contradicted longstanding United States policy and was
eventually retracted’.

(27) On June 5, 1996, the House of Representatives adopted an
amendment to House Bill 3540 (the Foreign Operations, Export
Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997) to reduce
aid to Turkey by $3,000,000 (an estimate of its payment of lobbying
fees in the United States) until the Turkish Government acknowledged
the Armenian Genocide and took steps to honor the memory of its
victims.

(28) President William Jefferson Clinton, on April 24, 1998, stated:
`This year, as in the past, we join with Armenian-Americans throughout
the nation in commemorating one of the saddest chapters in the history
of this century, the deportations and massacres of a million and a
half Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in the years 1915-1923.’.

(29) President George W. Bush, on April 24, 2004, stated: `On this
day, we pause in remembrance of one of the most horrible tragedies of
the 20th century, the annihilation of as many as 1,500,000 Armenians
through forced exile and murder at the end of the Ottoman Empire.’.

(30) Despite the international recognition and affirmation of the
Armenian Genocide, the failure of the domestic and international
authorities to punish those responsible for the Armenian Genocide is a
reason why similar genocides have recurred and may recur in the
future, and that a just resolution will help prevent future genocides.

DECLARATION OF POLICY

Sec. 3.

The House of Representatives–

(1) calls upon the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the
United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity
concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and
genocide documented in the United States record relating to the
Armenian Genocide and the consequences of the failure to realize a
just resolution; and

(2) calls upon the President in the President’s annual message
commemorating the Armenian Genocide issued on or about April 24, to
accurately characterize the systematic and deliberate annihilation of
1,500,000 Armenians as genocide and to recall the proud history of
United States intervention in opposition to the Armenian Genocide.

Armenia seeks for relations with Russia, US, EU, Georgia, Iran

Aysor, Armenia
March 7 2010

Armenia seeks for relations with Russia, US, EU, Georgia, Iran

`We wish for deepening of relations with Russia as well as with U.S.,
the EU, Georgia, and Iran,’ said Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward
Nalbandian in his interview with Armenian Public Television. He
pointed that in Armenian government’s interest is to solve all
disagreements with partners. `We are interested in solving of all
existing disagreements, and, standing from this position, we will move
forward,’ said Minister Nalbandian.

When asked whether Armenia is ready to mediate any talks, Edward
Nalbandian said: `One shouldn’t stretch the truth of real capabilities
of Armenia; however, sometimes Armenia plays role of a mediator. As in
talks on the Upper Lars checkpoint’s opening, which successfully were
held with Armenia’s mediation and resulted in a big hand. And now,
when the checkpoint has opened, we can openly state that this was our
big time, this was a success of Russia, Georgia, and Armenia.’

Armenia positive about Kazakhstan’s initiative

news.am, Armenia
March 6 2010

Armenia positive about Kazakhstan’s initiative

13:26 / 03/06/2010Armenia is positive about Kazakhstan’s initiative on
Karabakh conflict, said RA FM Edward Nalbandian in an interview with
public TV channel.

`Statements by Kazakhstan and readiness to assist the OSCE MG
co-chairs’ efforts and parties as OSCE presiding country should be
taken into account considering its CSTO membership. That country is
our ally and certainly we are well disposed towards it,’ Nalbandian
stated.

Earlier, OSCE Chairman-in-Office and Kazakh Foreign Minister Kanat
Saudabayev stated that Kazakhstan intends to be actively involved in
settlement to frozen conflicts, and country’s president Nursultan
Nazarbayev even submitted proposals to conflicting parties.

S.T.

Armenian`Turkish reconciliation will stop, Erdogan threatens

Aysor, Armenia
March 5 2010

Armenian`Turkish reconciliation will stop, Erdogan threatens

`Turkey is sorry for the approval of the Armenian Genocide resolution
by the US House of Foreign Affairs Committee’, – the statement of the
Turkish Government reads.

Yesterday the US House of Foreign Affairs Committee accepted the
H.Res.252 – Armenian Genocide Resolution.

"We condemn this resolution which charges Turkish nation with a crime
that it did not commit. Under the influence of political motives,
supporters of this resolution have taken a wrong and unjust stance
ignoring historical facts and difference of opinion among experts. We
have serious concerns that the resolution that was passed regardless
our warnings will badly influence the Armenian ` Turkish relations and
will lead to a deadlock", – the statement of the Turkish Government
reads.

Just after the passage of the resolution Turkey has called back his
envoy to the US for consultations.

BAKU: FM: Decision by House committee on foreign affairs regretful

Trend, Azerbaijan
March 5 2010

FM spokesman: Decision by U.S. House of Representatives committee on
foreign affairs makes regret
05.03.2010 19:24

Azerbaijan, Baku, March 5 /Trend News, U.Sadikhova/

Biased decision of the U.S. House of Representatives committee on
foreign affairs is a feeling of regret. The congressmen make a
decision around the unconfirmed events happening hundred years ago,
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokesman Elkhan Polukhov told Trend
News.

"If this process continues, it could bring harms to measures to
restore stability and security in the region, including the tense
negotiations on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict," Polukhov said.

U.S. House of Representatives committee on foreign affairs adopted the
resolution recognizing the so-called "Armenian genocide." Resolution
was adopted with 23 pros and 22 cons of congressmen.

Instead of making such subjective decisions, it would be better if the
same Congress would find the courage and assess the Armenian
aggression against Azerbaijan, which began 20 years ago, the crimes
committed against Azerbaijanis through the occupation and ethnic
cleansing, expelling million refugees and internally displaced persons
from their homes, said the Foreign Ministry spokesman.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.
Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. – are
currently holding the peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh region and the
occupied territories.

"All these events have been proven in the international community, and
living witnesses are still waiting for justice. I hope that the
decision of the committee on foreign affairs will not gain support in
Congress and it will not be adopted," said Polukhov.

Catalonia Parliament Recognizes The Armenian Genocide

CATALONIA PARLIAMENT RECOGNIZES THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

armradio.am
05.03.2010 18:13

On the initiative of the members of Barcelona’s Friendship Union
with Armenia, member of the Catalonian Parliament Maria Ross Fortuni
and Jose Samartin, the Parliament of Catalonia unilaterally passed a
decision on recognition of the Armenian Genocide, Press and Information
Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Armenia reports.

All-Armenia Fund Trustees Awarded St. Gregory The Great Order Medals

ALL-ARMENIA FUND TRUSTEES AWARDED ST. GREGORY THE GREAT ORDER MEDALS

2010/03/ 04 | 18:50

society

On Sunday, February 28, His Beatitude Nerses Bedros XIX Catholicos
Patriarch of Armenian Catholics, on behalf of His Holiness Benedict
XVI, awarded St. Gregory the Great Order medals to Bedros Terzian and
Vahe Jazmadarian, both members of the Board of Trustees, in recognition
of their longtime contribution to humanitarian efforts in Armenia. The
same medal was also awarded to Swiss-Armenian benefactor Vahe Gabrache.

The awards ceremony was attended by a distinguished roster of guests
from different countries including Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary of Armenia to Italy Mr. Ruben Karapetian, Armenian
catholic bishops. The grandiose ceremony took place after the Sunday
mass in the Armenian Catholic Convent of Rome.

http://hetq.am/en/society/hhh-12/

Kiro Manoyan Says House Panel Decision Another Stage In Armenian-Tur

KIRO MANOYAN SAYS HOUSE PANEL DECISION ANOTHER STAGE IN ARMENIAN-TURKISH COMPETITION

Yerkir
05.03.2010 15:44

Yerevan (Yerkir) – While the US House Foreign Relations Committee
passed the Armenian Genocide resolution as it had done before, it
was more difficult this time to pass Resolution 252, Kiro Manoyan,
the director of the ARF Bureau’s Hay Dat and Political Affairs Office,
said at a news conference today.

"Yesterday’s decision is not an answer to all our issues, it is rather
another stage in the Armenian-Turkish competition on the US arena,
and the Armenian side won this time," Manoyan said. He said that he
passage of the resolution was a serious pressure on Turkey and the
White House. Turkey is pressurized to take the negotiations with
Armenia more seriously, while the pressure on the White House is
made to prevent it from hampering the Armenian Genocide recognition
in Congress.

Hetq Editor – "When We Ask Specific Questions, The Government Is Tig

HETQ EDITOR – "WHEN WE ASK SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, THE GOVERNMENT IS TIGHT-LIPPED"
Natasha Harutyunyan

n/
2010/03/03 | 15:52

media

Speaking at a press conference today on the state of journalism in
Armenia, Hetq Chief Editor Edik Baghdasaryan noted that the "yellow
press" existed throughout the world and that the greater diversity
of the press, the better.

"There is much talk today about some papers violating ethical norms.

But there are such violations in Great Britain, France and the United
States, and it has never been a prime concern for those governments,"
Mr. Baghdasaryan said. "Those people are basically left alone. If
there’s a demand for such papers and they have readers, then such a
segment of the press should exist."

Mr. Baghdasryan then commented on the accessibility of information
from various government agencies and noted that oftentimes the replies
received are vague and general.

"It’s absurd. In many cases we have to go back and ask for
clarification of what such agencies and departments state. In general,
state bodies are tight-lipped when it comes to providing specific
answers," the Hetq Editor said and gave the example of the one million
AMD watches presented to officials at the State Revenue Committee
New Year’s party.

"Who received the watches and where did the money come from. When
you ask such specific questions, you don’t get any answers, Mr.

Baghdasaryan said

He said that a political decision must be passed for everything that
happens in Armenia. Thus, he argued that when courts launch cases
involving assaults and attacks on reporters, there is no political
directive from on high to apprehend those responsible and the cases
go unresolved.

"When you cover criminal cases and start to dig, you come to the
realization that what’s lacking is professionalism. Pre-trial criminal
investigations are so poorly conducted and unsupervised that you say to
yourself, who is investigating the investigators?" Baghdasaryan said.

He argued that while journalist at least had the opportunity to write
about violations of the law directed at them, there are people in
the outlying regions of Armenia that have no such defense.

"It’s a tossup. Sometimes we hear about their cases and sometimes they
are never covered, or we find out about them months after the fact.

Instead of focusing on the ethical misconduct of some papers, we should
be focusing on the overall poor level of human rights in Armenia,"
argued Mr. Baghdasaryan.

http://hetq.am/en/media/e-baghdasarya