BAKU: Armenia’s Request On NK Armenians’ Participation In Conference

ARMENIA’S REQUEST ON NAGORNO KARABAKH ARMENIANS’ PARTICIPATION IN CONFERENCE IN BERLIN REJECTED

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Oct 8 2007

Armenia’s request on participation of Nagorno Karabakh Armenians in
the debates on "frozen conference" in Berlin, the capital of Germany
on November 5 has been rejected, APA reports in reference to Armenian
mass media.

Davud Arutyunyan,head of Armenian delegation to the Council of Europe
Parliamentary Assembly noted that they expected that their appeal
will be rejected: "We raised this issue to draw attention to new
concept with presence of Nagorno Karabakh."

Mr. Arutyunyan noted that they will raise an issue on holding separate
conference with the participation of Nagorno Karabakh.

Eduard Lintner , German parliamentarian, chief of Council of Europe
Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) Monitoring Committee initiated to hold
the debates.

Azerbaijani, Georgian, and Moldovan foreign ministers, their
delegations to the PACE and other senior officials to are expected
to attend this conference.

Probability Of Armenian First President’s Participation In Forthcomi

PROBABILITY OF ARMENIAN FIRST PRESIDENT’S PARTICIPATION IN FORTHCOMING ELECTION HAS REACHED 50%, HIS TEAMMATE SAYS

ArmInfo Agency, Armenia
Oct 6 2007

ArmInfo. "The probability of the Armenian first President Levon
Ter-Petrosyan’s participation in the forthcoming presidential election
has reached 50%. Indeed, the ex-president said about that at one
of his recent regional meetings with the activists of the Armenian
Pan-National Movement (APNM)," Vahagn Khachatryan, a representative
of the oppositional Alternative movement and former mayor of Yerevan,
told journalists at the Azdak club, Saturday.

According to him, the goal of L.Ter-Petrosyan’s visits to the country’s
regions is to see the situation on the spot.

L.Ter-Petrosyan has already visited all the regions of Armenia. He
had sincere conversations with his followers, and it became clear that
there is hard work to be done, and all the problems cannot be solved
at once. "By the way, some representatives of local administrations
also attend these meetings, and they are not afraid of consequences
despite the atmosphere ruling in the country," V.Khachatryan said.

At the same time, it was difficult for the oppositionist to say when
L.Ter-Petrosyan’s followers will start mass meetings in Yerevan and
other populated areas. "In any case, we’ll pass to a more active
phase of actions, as we are denied air time, and it remains for us
to have direct contacts with people," V.Khachatryan said. To recall,
after the meeting with L.Ter-Petrosyan, Academician Rafael Ghazaryan
has recently given a guess that the meetings with the ex-president’s
participation may start in late October.

200 Thousand Armenians In Moscow

200 THOUSAND ARMENIANS IN MOSCOW

AZG Armenian Daily
05/10/2007

According to official data, 200 thousand Armenians are registered
in Moscow. In 2002, that number was 170 thousand. The number of the
Azerbaijanis in Moscow is 145 thousand. Nevertheless, the specialists
insist that the number of the foreigners in Moscow is more.

RF Head of the Migration Service underlined that every year 20 mln
immigrants arrive in Russia, 10 mln of them – illegally.

Turkey: Newspaper Owner Gunned Down: Insulting Turkishness Still A C

NEWSPAPER OWNER GUNNED DOWN: "INSULTING TURKISHNESS" STILL A CRIME

IFEX, Canada
International Freedom of Expression eXpress
Oct 3 2007

Turkey:

A newspaper owner was shot to death in southeastern Turkey on 22
September, reports IPS Communication Foundation (BIANET).

Kasim Ciftci, owner of the "Hakkari Province Voice" newspaper, was
found dead near the ruins of old Van City on 22 September. According to
"Yuksekova News", eyewitnesses saw two men arguing near the ruins.

The argument turned into a fight, and Ciftci was shot twice.

Meanwhile, Turkey continues to use the judicial system to curb free
expression. Journalists are still being charged under Article 301
of Turkey’s Penal Code, which makes "insulting Turkishness" a crime
punishable by prison terms. Turkish rights groups, including BIANET
and the Initiative for Freedom of Expression, have been reporting on
the numerous trials and actively campaigning to abolish the law.

According to International PEN, ARTICLE 19 and the International
Publishers Association (IPA), 18 trials against 24 people under
Article 301 were heard between April and July 2007.

Just last week, Haci Bogatekin, owner of the local paper "Gerger Firat"
in Adiyaman, southeastern Turkey, was accused under Article 301 for
his March 2007 article entitled "Turkey has made mistakes".

Bogatekin blamed the state for the deaths of "millions of Armenians
and Syriac Christians," and other ethnic and religious groups across
the country.

Last month, International PEN, ARTICLE 19 and IPA issued an open
letter to the newly-elected President of Turkey Adbulah Gul calling
for the abolition of Article 301.

The letter laments that the article was not abolished in the wake of
the assassination of Hrant Dink in January 2007. Dink, editor of the
Armenian-Turkish weekly "Agos", had been convicted under Article 301
for comments on mass killings of Armenians a century ago. Critics
say his conviction led to him being targeted.

The full text of the letter can be can be downloaded at:

/en/content/view/full/86721/

http://tinyurl.com/3xwr6t
http://www.ifex.org

PACE elects twelve judges to the European Court of Human Rights

PACE elects twelve judges to the European Court of Human Rights

Strasbourg, 03.10.2007 – The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe (PACE), meeting this week in plenary session in Strasbourg,
yesterday elected twelve judges to the European Court of Human Rights.
They are the following:

* Ledi Bianku, in respect of Albania, for a period which begins 1
February 2008 and ends 31 January 2014
* Josep Casadevall Medrano, in respect of Andorra, for a period which
begins 1 November 2007 and ends 31 October 2013
* Alvina Gyulumyan, in respect of Armenia, for a period which begins 1
November 2007 and ends 31 October 2013
* Elisabeth Steiner, in respect of Austria, for a period which begins 1
November 2007 and ends 31 October 2013
* George Nicolaou, in respect of Cyprus, for a period which begins 1
February 2008 and ends 31 January 2014
* Peer Lorenzen, in respect of Denmark, for a period which begins 1
November 2007 and ends 31 October 2013
* Nona Tsotsoria, in respect of Georgia, for a period which begins 1
February 2008 and ends 31 January 2014
* András Sajó, in respect of Hungary, for a period which begins 1
February 2008 and ends 31 January 2014
* Vladimiro Zagrebelsky, in respect of Italy, for a period which begins
1 November 2007 and ends 31 October 2013
* Corneliu Bîrsan, in respect of Romania, for a period which begins 1
November 2007 and ends 31 October 2013
* Luis López Guerra, in respect of Spain, for a period which begins 1
February 2008 and ends 31 January 2014
* Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, in respect of "the Former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia", for a period which begins 1 February 2008 and
ends 31 January 2014.

Judges are elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe from lists of three candidates nominated by each State which has
ratified the European Convention on Human Rights. Judges are elected for
six years and can be re-elected.

Links to the results of the vote
< Documents/Records/2007/E/0710021500E.htm#Election& gt; and the CVs of candidates
< sp?link=3D/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc07/EDOC11359.h tm> .

Contacts for the press:
– Communication Unit of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe,
tel ; +33 3 88 41 31 93, [email protected] ;
– Press and Public Relations Unit of the European Court of Human Rights,

tel. +33 3 88 41 21 54, [email protected] ,

Press Release
Parliamentary Assembly Communication Unit
Ref: 645a07
Tel: +33 3 88 41 31 93
Fax :+33 3 90 21 41 34
[email protected]
internet:

The Parliamentary Assembly brings together 318 members from the national
parliaments of the 47 member states.
President: René van der Linden (Netherlands, EPP/CD); Secretary
General of the Assembly: Mateo Sorinas.
Political Groups: SOC (Socialist Group); EPP/CD (Group of the European
People’s Party); ALDE (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe);

EDG (European Democratic Group); UEL (Group of the Unified European
Left).

http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=3D/
http://www.assembly.coe.int/Mainf.a
http://assembly.coe.int
http://www.echr.coe.int
www.coe.int/press

MFA: FM Oskanian Speaks for Small Nations at UN General Assembly

PRESS RELEASE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
Contact: Information Desk
Tel: (374-10) 52-35-31
Email: [email protected]
Web:

Minister Oskanian Speaks for Small Nations at UN General Assembly

STATEMENT BY
H.E. VARTAN OSKANIAN
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF
THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
At the 62nd Session of the UN General Assembly
October 3, 2007
New York

Mr. President,

Each opportunity to speak from this podium is a humbling experience, knowing
that every country in the world is listening to the other, trying to discern
where common approaches and interests lie.

Those of us representing small countries have a sense that this is the forum
where large states address the ills of the world, and we, smaller ones,
ought to adhere to topics that are specific to us, to our regions. As if,
addressing overarching, global issues would be pretentious, and they are
best left to those with the power to do something about them.

This is my 10th year here, and I will risk breaking that unwritten rule.
This year, as financial calamities have compounded political and natural
disasters, it is so evident that although our common problems and challenges
threaten us all equally, they affect us unevenly. Small countries, with less
of everything – diversity, resources, maneuverabilitiy, options and means –
are at greater peril, greater risk, greater vulnerability than those with
bigger territory, larger population, greater potential.

At the same time, the major political, social and environmental issues on
this Assembly¹s agenda — peace and security, economic growth and
sustainable development, human rights, disarmament, drugs, crime,
international terrorism – know no borders. None of us can tackle them
individually if we expect to resolve them effectively. Their solutions are
in our common interest. The problems are vast and touch all of humanity.
Because they cannot be solved within our borders alone, does not mean anyone
has the right, or the luxury, to abdicate responsibility for their
consequences.

When the speculative market drives the price of a barrel of oil to $80,
those too small to have significant reserves are more quickly affected. And
just as large countries with huge appetites for fuel make deals sometimes
inconsistent with their politics, so do we. For us, energy security is much
more than a matter of global arithmetic; it¹s a matter of life and death.

When climate change causes significant environmental transformation, it
doesn¹t take much for prolonged droughts and excessive rains to harm our
agriculture and damage our economy, or for rising shorelines to reach our
cities. But we lack the diversity and the space to adapt and cope.

When it is news that there are no explosions in Iraq, and when large scale
destruction is a daily occurrence, we in small countries become more keenly
aware of our vulnerability and susceptibility to the will and capacity of
the international community, to their tolerance for distant violence and
humiliation.

When development depends on an absence of bad weather, disease and war, and
when the capacity to ward off at least two of those three ills lies in the
hands of those with huge ability to heal and to make peace, small countries
are at risk and helpless.

When disarmament and arms control cease to be the means to world peace, and
instead become the means to score political dividends, small countries
resort to their own means of self-protection. In other words, we become part
of the problem, because the solution is neither straightforward, nor within
reach.

When Darfur becomes shorthand for hopelessness, we in the small corners of
the world realize that power has become a substitute for responsibility. The
ubiquitous language of human rights cannot compensate for political will.
Genocide must be prevented, not commemorated. Generation after generation,
we find new names for man¹s appalling tolerance for what we think are
inhuman machinations, new names for the places of horror, slaughter,
massacre, indiscriminate killing of all those who have belonged to a
segment, a category, an ethnic group, a race or a religion. Nearly 100 years
ago, for Armenians it was Deir-El-Zor. For the next generation, it was
Auschwitz, then the killing fields of the Cambodians. And most recently
Rwanda. If in each of those cases, together with genocide, these names
evoked ignorance, helplessness, wartime cover, today Darfur is synonymous
with expediency, evasion and simple inconvenience. Darfur is synonymous with
shame.

My appeal, on behalf of small countries, is that the international community
tackle each of these problems in their own right, for their own sake, and
not as pieces in a global power puzzle. When tensions among the world¹s
great powers grow, there is an increase in polarization and a decrease in
the effectiveness of the hard-earned — and costly — policies of
complementarity and balance of small countries. Our own room to maneuver, to
participate in global solutions, diminishes.

But Mr. President and colleagues, let me say the obvious. We rely on the
ability of global powers to put aside their own short-term conflicts and
divergences and to recognize that their power and influence does not make
them immune to the range of problems that afflict us. It also does not make
them immune from the impact of the failure of appropriately using that power
and influence – for the good of humanity.

Mr. President,

Last year we celebrated 16 years of Armenia¹s independence. We have
weathered sea changes, and been swept up in regional and global developments
which daily affect our lives.

We can only be proud of what we¹ve accomplished — an open, diversified
economy, high growth, strong financial systems; also, improved elections,
stronger public institutions, a population increasingly aware of its rights.
This makes us more determined to solve the remaining economic ills – uneven
growth, rural poverty and low wages – and further empower people and deepen
the exercise of democracy.

We¹ve done all this despite a still unresolved conflict and artificial
restrictions, and in the absence of regional cooperation.

The Nagorno Karabakh conflict is included on the agenda of this General
Assembly session under the topic of protracted conflicts. But Mr. President
any resolution that places all conflicts in one pot is necessarily flawed.
Each of these conflicts is different. The Nagorno Karabakh conflict doesn¹t
belong there. This isssue should not be discussed at the UN, because it is
being negotiated in the OSCE.
First, the Nagorno Karabakh conflict is not frozen. We continue to negotiate
and we are inching towards resolution. Second, there is a well-developed
negotiating document on the table, based not on wishful thinking, but on the
core issue and the consequential issues. Together, they add up to a balanced
solution. Third, at the core of the process lies the issue of the right of
the people of Nagorno Karabakh to determine their own future. Indeed, the
people of Nagorno Karabakh don¹t want anything that is not theirs – they
want a right to live in peace and security and to determine their own
future, they want to exercise the right that every people here has exercised
at some point in their history.

Mr. President, we follow very closely developments on Kosovo. We hear the
international community loud and clear, that Kosovo cannot be a precedent
for other conflicts. While we have no intention to use Kosovo as a prececent
for our conflict, since that would contradict our own position that all
conflicts are different. But at the same time, we won¹t understand or accept
the reverse logic – that if Kosovo is given independence, no other people
can achieve self-determination. No one should tell us that there is a quota
on liberty and security.

Mr. President, at the end of the day, small countries¹ awareness of and
place in global processes cannot, will not, substitute for those with
extensive resources and the political will and ability to act. In this age
of openness and inclusion, there is no room for the the old instruments of
coercion and exclusion. Instead, the new instruments of compromise and
consensus are necessary to reach humanity¹s enduring goals of peace and
prosperity.

http://www.ArmeniaForeignMinistry.am

Lord Russel Johnson Meets Heads Of Armenian And Azerbaijani Delegati

LORD RUSSEL JOHNSON MEETS HEADS OF ARMENIAN AND AZERBAIJANI DELEGATIONS TO PACE

ArmInfo News Agency, Armenia
Oct 2 2007

ArmInfo. Chairman of PACE Subcommittee on Nagorno Karabakh issue Lord
Russel Johnson met Heads of the Armenian and Azerbaijani delegations
to PACE David Harutyunyan and Samed Seidov.

During the meeting, the Head of the Armenian delegation emphasized
importance of the visit to Nagorno Karabakh and expressed regret that
Azerbaijan creates artificial obstacles to prevent the Subcommittee
members’ visit. This time, Azerbaijan has chosen a way of changing
the visit’s format. D. Harutyunyan recalled that visits of the
international institutions, including PACE, to Nagorno Karabakh were
carried out through the territory of Armenia over several years.

Lord Russel Johnson expressed concern over the developed situation
and told about a forced cancellation of the scheduled visit. The
further development of the situation is unclear at the moment.

Turkish Police Accused Of Cover-Up In Journalist’s Murder

TURKISH POLICE ACCUSED OF COVER-UP IN JOURNALIST’S MURDER
by Nicolas Cheviron

Agence France Presse — English
October 1, 2007 Monday 2:46 PM GMT

Turkish police withheld and destroyed evidence to cover up the killing
of ethnic Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, a lawyer for his family
claimed as the second hearing in the murder trial began here Monday.

"Evidence and information is being hidden from prosecutors… A lot of
evidence was destroyed and lost," Fethiye Cetin said in an interview
with the Radikal newspaper.

Several suspects in the murder, for which 19 people are on trial,
indicated in their testimonies that "they believed they were acting
on behalf of the state," she said.

Dink, 52, a prominent member of Turkey’s tiny Armenian minority,
was gunned down on January 19 outside the offices of his bilingual
Turkish-Armenian weekly Agos, in central Istanbul.

Although he campaigned for reconciliation, nationalists hated him for
calling the massacres of Armenians under Ottoman rule during World
War I genocide, a label that Ankara fiercely rejects.

Cetin said tape from a security camera outside a bank near Agos
disappeared after being taken by police.

The security forces also tapped telephone conversations of two key
suspects before the murder and when prosecutors learned this, they
were given incomplete records, she added.

"Something is being covered up — maybe certain relationships"
between the suspects and members of the security forces, she said.

Dink’s murder prompted fresh calls on Ankara to purge the "deep state"
— a term used to describe security forces prepared to act outside the
law to preserve what they consider to be the best national interests.

The charge sheet says police received intelligence as early as 2006
of a plot to kill Dink organised in the northern city of Trabzon,
home of self-confessed gunman Ogun Samast, 17, and most of his 18
alleged accomplices.

Samast admitted to the shooting because Dink was "an enemy of the
Turks," according to the indictement.

In Monday’s hearing, held behind closed doors because Samast is a
minor, the teenager repeated his confession before the judge and said
he would not have killed Dink if he knew he had a family, lawyers at
the hearing told reporters.

Samast, who said he was high on drugs when he pulled the trigger
three times, faces up to 42 years in jail; he avoided a life sentence
because he is a minor.

Two other key suspects — Yasin Hayal and Erhan Tuncel, both 26 —
are accused of heading the ultra-nationalist group Samast belonged
to and of masterminding the murder. They could be jailed for life if
found guilty.

The indictment says Tuncel was a police informer who twice told
officials in 2006 that Hayal was planning to kill Dink, but
deliberately concealed the fact that someone else would pull the
trigger because Tuncel himself was involved in the plot.

Hayal earlier served 11 months for the 2004 bombing in Trabzon of a
McDonald’s restaurant, in which six people were injured, to protest
against the US-led invasion of Iraq.

The 16 other suspects face sentences of seven-and-a-half to 35 years.

The role of the members of the security forces in Dink’s murder came
up again at the weekend as a taped telephone conversation between a
policeman and Tuncel shortly after the killing was leaked to the media.

The dialogue, which includes degrading comments about the victim,
suggests the policeman knew in advance of the murder plot.

Some 300 people demonstrated near the courthouse Monday, shouting,
"We are all witnesses. We want justice."

Claudia Roth, the visiting leader of Germany’s Greens Party, said
outside the courthouse that "Article 301 killed Dink" and urged
Ankara to abolish the infamous penal code provision that penalises
"insulting Turkishness."

Dink was given a suspended six-month sentence last year under the
article, which the European Union says is a serious affront to free
speech in Turkey.

Recognition Of Armenian Genocide By Bulgaria Is An Issue Of Time

RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE BY BULGARIA IS AN ISSUE OF TIME

PanARMENIAN.Net
02.10.2007 14:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Bulgaria
is an issue of time, the RA Ambassador to Bulgaria, Sergei Manasarian
told a news conference in Yerevan.

The draft bill introduced in the Bulgarian parliament was blocked by
a Turkish party which serves on the coalition government.

"The Armenian Genocide recognition is a painful issue for Bulgarian
society saturated with ethnic Turks.

However, the Turkish community never made anti-Armenian statements
on April 24. There was once an article in a Turkish-language
newspaper. But it did not attract attention," Amb. Manasarian said.

Progress may be expected after the parliamentary and presidential
elections in Bulgaria, according to him.

May 12, 2006 the Bulgarian parliament voted down a resolution
recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

At that time "Attack" nationalist party called on the parliament to
proclaim April 24 the day of commemoration of the Armenian Genocide
victims.

The parliamentarians, however, said that "passage of the Armenian
Genocide resolution will lead to tensions in the Bulgaria-Turkey
relations and cause a split in the coalition government formed by
three parties, including the party of Turkish minority."

Lawyer: Turkish Teen Says He Regrets Killing Ethnic Armenian Journal

LAWYER: TURKISH TEEN SAYS HE REGRETS KILLING ETHNIC ARMENIAN JOURNALIST

The Associated Press
International Herald Tribune, France
Oct 1 2007

ISTANBUL, Turkey: A teenager accused of killing ethnic Armenian
journalist Hrant Dink told a court on Monday he regretted his actions
and claimed he carried out the slaying under the influence of drugs,
according to a lawyer present at the hearing.

Dink was shot dead in front of his newspaper’s office in January in
a brazen daylight attack that prompted international condemnation
and debate within Turkey about free speech.

On Saturday, Turkish media aired a recording of a telephone
conversation between one of the suspects and a police officer. The
dialogue, even though vague, suggests the police officer knew about
a plan to kill the journalist but did nothing to protect him or hunt
down the plotters.

Although the tape emerged Saturday, there have been claims of police
negligence since the arrest of the teenager, including allegations
that one of the suspects who planned the killing was a police informant
and was in close contact with police officials.

Dink was hated by hardline nationalists for describing the mass
killings of Armenians early in the last century as genocide, which
is considered an insult by most Turks.