Seminar on financial ombudsman services in Great Britain starts in

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Dec 5 2007

Seminar on financial ombudsman services in Great Britain starts in
Yerevan

YEREVAN, December 5. /ARKA/. A two-day seminar on services of
financial ombudsman in Great Britain started in Yerevan Wednesday.
During the seminar main functions of financial ombudsman and its role
in defending consumer rights in financial sector will be introduced
to participants, the President of the Central Bank of Armenia (CBA)
Tigran Sargsian said at the opening of the seminar.

The experience of foreign colleagues will help Armenia form this
institution in Armenia in a correct manner, Sargsian said. He
reported that the concept of financial ombudsman in Armenia has been
developed by CBA and will be submitted to the parliament for
consideration.

One of the reporters at the seminar Corporate Director and Principal
Ombudsman of Great Britain David Thomas said that a number of reports
will be made during the seminar, including reports on history of
financial ombudsman institution, the main spheres of services,
management of the institution and its resources, relations with
involved parties, as well as a range of issues most often considered
by the institution in England.

Thomas reported that, together with his colleague, a leading
ombudsman on banking and credit issues of Ombudsman’s Institute in
Great Britain Jane Hingston, they will try to introduce the work of
the structure. Davis expressed hope that this will help Armenian
specialists.

Among the participants in the discussion will be representative of
Armenia’s President administration, ministries dealing with economic
issues, Judicial Department, Cassation Court of Armenia, Ministry of
Justice, the Central Bank and the Union of Banks of Armenia,
Association of Insurers, as well as public organization on consumer
rights in Armenia.-0 –

Polish Police Find Man, Parrots In Luggage

POLISH POLICE FIND MAN, PARROTS IN LUGGAGE

United Press International
Dec 3 2007

WARSAW, Poland, Dec. 3 (UPI) — Polish police found a 38-year-old
Armenian man trying to illegally enter the country by hiding in a
woman’s luggage.

Police said the man was inside a suitcase on a Kiev-to-Berlin passenger
train, Polish radio said Monday.

The luggage belonged to a 50-year-old Ukrainian woman.

The man, who was arrested, had forged documents including a card with
a false name, police said.

In another border incident, a Ukrainian man was arrested Sunday
when he tried to to smuggle 65 parrots into Poland, also in luggage,
a radio report said.

The parrots were of a protected species and the man did not have the
documents required to transport them. The birds were sent to a zoo
in Warsaw.

Abkhazian Deputy Defense Minister: We Will Be Side By Side With Sout

ABKHAZIAN DEPUTY DEFENSE MINISTER: WE WILL BE SIDE BY SIDE WITH SOUTH OSSETIA AND KARABAKH

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.11.2007 14:38 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ If something happens in South Ossetia or Karabakh
we will be by their side, Abkhazian Deputy Defense Minister Gary
Kupalba said when addressing the panel of the permanent coordination
council of Cossack atamans in Yerevan. He voiced assurance in peaceful
resolution of conflicts in the region and in triumph of right of
nations to self-determination.

For his part, council’s deputy chairman Sergei Madatyan said that a
monument to his renowned ancestor, hero of 1812 war Valerian Madatov
will be erected in Yerevan and NKR in the near future, IA Regnum
reports.

RA Parliament Approved Budget 2008

RA PARLIAMENT APPROVED BUDGET 2008

2007-11-28 13:59:00

ArmInfo. Today, RA parliament approved the final version of the
country’s budget for 2008 at its extraordinary sitting.

As RA Finance and Economy Minister Vardan Khachatryan said, the
revenue side of the country’s revised state budget will make up 746
bln drams, the expenditure side – 822 bln drams, the budget deficit –
76 bln drams. The revenues and expenditures the local authorities’
budgets will turn out at the level of 47,3 bln drams. Growth of the
country’s GDP is forecasted at the level of 10%. As the minister
said, as a result of the parliamentary discussions, most of the
proposals was received on education – for about 10 bln drams. These
proposals were made by representatives of the Republican party, and
ARF "Dashnaktsutyun". Moreover, the proposals concerned improvement
of the water supply system, motor roads, health care and the social
sphere. In fact, the proposals were received for 3 bln drams. In
general, V. Khachatryan said, there were few changes made. In
particular, the revenues and expenditure sides of the budget were
reduced by 720 mln mainly conditioned by vibration of American
dollar rate. First, they were going to set American dollar rate to
the Armenian dram at 336 drams, but after revision, it was set at 325
drams for a dollar. Moreover, the government offered to increase the
revenue side of the state budget by 2 bln drams. It is envisaged to
direct the funds at the human resource, for an overhaul of schools
and construction of new educational establishments.

RA State Customer Committee Warnings

RA STATE CUSTOMER COMMITTEE WARNINGS

Panorama.am
20:47 28/11/2007

RA State Customer Committee warns physical persons, who run importing
business, refuse smuggling, as they started their strict control. Today
Levon Karapetyan, the head of customer supervision department announced
this information.

According to him strengthening the control is mainly conditioned by
the active trade of the soon coming holidays. The control is carried
out for all importing merchandise both by train and other ways.

Levon Karapetyan mentioned that the smuggling becomes more and more
active on these holidays but they are controlled by the customer
employees, and appropriate measures are taken to bring the activity
into its ordinary way.

Mrs. Evans Reveals Intriguing Details Of Her Husband’s Recall

MRS. EVANS REVEALS INTRIGUING DETAILS OF HER HUSBAND’S RECALL
By Harut Sassounian, Publisher, The California Courier

AZG Armenian Daily
29/11/2007

More than two years after her husband became the first U.S. diplomat
to publicly acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, Donna Evans revealed
some of the behind-the-scene details of Ambassador John Evans’ tenure
in Armenia and his dramatic forced retirement from the U.S. Foreign
Service. She spoke at the Armenian Assembly’s Annual Capital Region
Holiday Reception held at the Armenian Embassy in Washington, D.C.,
on November 18.

Mrs. Evans began her talk by describing the phone call she received
from her husband, telling her, "Assistant Secretary of State Beth
Jones had just informed him that he was the State Department’s choice
to be assigned as Ambassador to Armenia in the summer of 2004. She
told him that it was a small country but growing in importance and
had a significant assistance program and a new Embassy was being
built. She encouraged him to accept it and he did, without hesitation."

After Senate confirmation, Amb. Evans and his wife moved to Armenia
in fall 2004. Mrs. Evans described the constant "tension" because the
"unwritten policy of the State Department was that the word ‘genocide’
had to be in quotation marks and, if spoken, it would be referred to
as the ‘g’ word." She said Foreign Service officers "knew, for certain,
that the word ‘genocide’ was a strict taboo."

She went on to state, "The Armenian genocide was a very sensitive
subject and therefore avoided in diplomatic circles in Yerevan. The
wives of other ambassadors did not talk about it even in private. The
first time we drove by the Genocide Memorial my husband whispered to me
‘there’s the Genocide Memorial.’ I looked over and caught a fleeting
glance of the spire. As I turned back, our driver’s eyes caught mine
in the rear view mirror. I was so uncomfortable. My husband told me
that we were allowed to go there once a year, on April 24th."

Amb. Evans’ problems began during his speaking tour of the Armenian
communities in the United States in early 2005. Upon the couple’s
arrival in California, Mrs. Evans said her husband informed her that
"he was going to use the word ‘genocide’ and that it might cost him
his job." She said she was "stunned at first but then very proud of
him. I hoped that telling the truth would result in no more than a
reprimand and that he would be marginalized for a while. I thought
that losing his job was the very worst-case scenario."

Once her husband used the term "genocide" in public, Donna Evans was
amazed that the Armenian American media did not rush to publicize it
immediately – "It was as if they were protecting the Ambassador."

Eventually, after a press release from ANC revealed that Amb. Evans
had actually used the words "Armenian Genocide" during his talk
at Berkeley, she said her "husband went on to Washington to brief
the State Department on what had transpired. The reaction was not
pretty to say the least" which made her "sick at heart." Meanwhile,
the Ambassador did not know "whether his recall orders would be on
his desk when he returned to Yerevan. I did not know whether I would
be returning to Yerevan myself."

Mrs. Evans had harsh words for the State Department for buckling under
Turkish pressure. "It was unthinkable that the Turkish ambassador and
the Government of Turkey had enough clout to get a knee-jerk reaction
from the State Department and cause the recall of an ambassador,"
she said.

Leaving his ambassadorial post voluntarily was out of question,
Mrs. Evans said. "Not resigning was the right thing to do. My husband
had not committed a crime, he only acknowledged a crime," she said.

Upon returning to Yerevan, Mrs. Evans said her husband went on
carrying out his diplomatic duties and "acted as if it was business
as usual…. However, each morning he arrived at the office wondering
if the morning e-mail and telegram traffic would include his official
recall. Then, on July 2, 2005, the dreaded telephone call came." Dan
Fried, the Assistant Secretary of State, called to inform that her
husband’s position was "about to be posted as open for the summer of
2006 and that we could be removed at any time," she said.

Mrs. Evans said she was "furious" particularly since this call had come
"just before July the 4th, Independence Day and axed a professional
diplomat with 35 years of faithful service to his government —
and a 12th generation American — just because he said ‘genocide’
in an academic setting in the United States."

Mrs. Evans further revealed that she wrote a personal letter to First
Lady Laura Bush because she said she believed "in spouse power." She
never received a reply.

When the word got out — this writer was the first to report that
Amb. Evans was about to be recalled for his statement on the Armenian
Genocide — Mrs. Evans reported that "the pressure was on…[there was]
wild speculation in the Armenian papers, some calling my husband a
hero and others not so flattering and some downright ridiculous. Again
the press had a field day.

My husband’s answer had to be ‘I serve at the pleasure of the
President.’ I died a little every time I heard him say it."

Notably, Mrs. Evans revealed that during those tumultuous days, "the
diplomatic community" supported her husband "privately." She then
described April 24, 2006 as "an unforgettable day" in her life when
thousands of Armenians from all walks of life tied yellow ribbons to
a fence at the Genocide Memorial Monument in Yerevan, in support of
her husband. "How this was pulled together and who supported it is a
remarkable story. I wish I could give them all a hug individually. This
event inspired us to stay strong during a very trying time," she said.

As they say, the rest is history. The White House cut Amb. Evans’
service short and announced the nomination of his successor, Richard
Hoagland, who never made it to Armenia.

Showing her continued support for the reaffirmation of the Armenian
Genocide, Mrs. Evans said that when the House Foreign Affairs Committee
adopted the Armenian Genocide resolution, it was one of the happiest
days of her life.

However, she was "stunned and outraged" when her husband showed
her the letter that was signed by eight former Secretaries of State
opposing the congressional resolution on the Armenian Genocide. "How
could Secretaries of State so blindly sign such a document?

What I would say to the former Secretaries of State is ‘shame on
you’ for being used by the Turkish lobby. By your actions, you have
set back any progress that has been made to normalize diplomatic
relations between Armenia and Turkey. It would have been better to
remain silent. A special shame on Secretary [of State Alexander]
Haig because he served under President Reagan, who acknowledged the
genocide," she said.

Donna Evans described her dismay at some of the negative reactions to
the genocide resolution. "What followed was the worst turn of events
that I had witnessed in all my time in Washington. The supporters of
the recognition of the genocide were in shock and awe at the cruel
commentaries, articles, and Internet buzz. What we were witnessing
was a hyper-overkill of a human rights issue."

She concluded her remarks with heart-warming words: "The Armenian
experience has woven itself into my soul like the intricate carvings
in the Khachkars. It is beautiful, it is sad and it is hopeful. So
what do we do now? We don’t give up. We bide our time and return
to the fight, more experienced, better informed and therefore better
armed. Most important of all we continue to educate. Grassroots support
is vital. You are vital. This issue needs to be resolved. You and your
ancestors deserve an apology and recognition of the first genocide
of the 20th century…the Armenian Genocide."

ANC-WR Educational Update On HRes106 At United Armenian Congr Church

Armenian National Committee – Western Region
104 North Belmont Street, Suite 200
Glendale, California 91206
Phone: 818.500.1918
Fax: 818.246.7353
[email protected]

PRESS RELEASE

November 28, 2007
Contact: Haig Hovsepian

Tel: (818) 500-1918

ANC-WR Provides Educational Update On Genocide Resolution At United Armenian
Congregational Church

Los Angeles, CA – The Armenian National Committee-Western Region provided an
analysis of the genocide resolution pending in the U.S. Congress to members
of the Mens Fellowship Club at the United Armenian Congregational Church in
Studio City on November 27, 2007.  The briefing,  provided by ANC-WR
Chairman Raffi Hamparian, gave the crowd of over 70 Armenian Americans an
opportunity to learn about the genocide resolution and its consideration by
the House Foreign Affairs Committee last month.

`The ANC-WR is pleased to have provided an educational presentation to
members of the Mens Fellowship Club,’ remarked ANC-WR Executive Director
Andrew Kzirian.  `Whether it is providing educationals on Armenian topics to
Rotary and Kiwanis Clubs, or to Armenian groups, we welcome engaging people
on any number of Armenian issues.  The briefing that our chairman provided
on the genocide resolution is part of a broad grassroots effort to keep all
Armenian Americans aware of the challenges we have and continue to face in
seeking justice for the events of 1915,’ Kzirian added.

The Mens Fellowship Club at the United Armenian Congregational Church
regularly hosts speakers on a variety of religious and public policy
issues.  The ANC-WR briefing provided members a full accounting of the
history behind the genocide resolution sponsored by Representatives Adam
Schiff (D-CA) and George Radanovich (R-CA) and a synopsis of what may occur
to the bill during the second session of the 110th Congress which begins
next January.

The Armenian National Committee – Western Region is the largest and most
influential Armenian American grassroots advocacy organization in the
Western United States. Working in coordination with a network of offices,
chapters, and supporters throughout the Western United States and affiliated
organizations around the country, the ANC-WR advances the concerns of the
Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.

www.anca.org

Another Shooting Incident Occurred In Yerevan, It Means People Were

ANOTHER SHOOTING INCIDENT OCCURRED IN YEREVAN, IT MEANS PEOPLE WERE SAVED
James Hakobyan

Largir, Armenia
Nov 29 2007

Another shooting incident occurred in Yerevan, and this time it was
not caused by the political views of the sides, the difference of their
visions of development of the country or devotion to their idea but by
pure business interests. In other words, this time we deal with the
self-interested aspirations of the minor bourgeoisie. In this sense,
the incidence which occurred in Silikyan district, as the TV channels
reported, involved the company offering services and the consumers is
not essential to the development of the country, the peace settlement
of the Karabakh conflict or the battle against corruption. Moreover,
in the context of shooting incidents, intimidation and assassinations
of the past few months the incident of Silikyan is not even worth
the attention of the law enforcers.

Moreover, it is possible that such minor incidents are meant to
distract the law enforcers from major ones. For instance, they
know that the Office of Prosecutor General is investigating the
self-denying deed of the son of the mayor of Gyumri when he was
involved in an unequal battle against the foes of the state in the
streets of the second city of the country. And now a minor incident
occurs somewhere, which has nothing to do with statehood, to split the
Office of Prosecutor General and distract it from the investigation of
the case of the son of the mayor of Gyumri. This is enough to overlook
the incident in Silikyan, to consider that nothing has happened. It
is necessary to be alert and not to focus on minor cases because they
may be intended to distract attention, and may be followed by fatal
cases right away.

Certainly, there might be citizens who may think differently. For
instance, they may think that in order to avoid fatal attempts and
intimidation it is necessary to prevent minor cases first because the
weapon used in minor incidents are later used for major crimes. It is
possible but it needs to be proved. And as long as no major crime has
been committed, it is impossible to prove that it was committed with
the weapon and participants of the minor crime. Therefore, if there
is need to prove, and there is always the need, it is necessary to
be patient and to wait until a fatal attempt or intimidation occurs.

That is why the law enforcers allow anyone to wear a gun and to shoot
any time they want. It is not accidental that some of our ancestors
sang in the beginning of the 20th century that only a weapon can
save Armenians. It is notable that they did not specify from whom the
weapon should save the Armenians. Perhaps it means global salvation.

If you have no weapon, you are thinking about salvation in vain
because at any moment an Armenian will emerge who will make you face
a choice: either you agree your neighbor is right and you love him,
despite the rights and laws, or the native land embraces you. In
our times, it is difficult to realize what salvation is, especially
when the church has stopped performing its main function of helping
people realize and has become an ethno-religious preacher. Perhaps
already the church does not realize what salvation is. Who knows,
someone may think that 40 drams for a candle is too expensive and
threaten with a gun to sell candles at an 85 percent discount and get
6 for free in case of buying three. Hence, the church is also facing
a choice: to buy weapon or to preach ethno-religion. Or two in one,
one in the streets of Yerevan – my faith is my weapon. Only the rest
of the citizens remain to get armed – armed with patience.

Oskanian’s address to OSCE 15th ministerial council

Lragir, Armenia
Nov 30 2007

VARTAN OSKANIAN’S ADDRESS TO OSCE 15TH MINISTERIAL COUNCIL

OSCE 15th Ministerial Council
November 29, 2007 Madrid, Spain

It’s already the end of the day, let me briefly address a few topics.
One related to OSCE reforms. Second, CFE; Third, a little bit about
Armenia’s elections and finally about the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.
But before all that, let me commend the Spanish chairmanship for the
very good work they’ve done during the year.

Although the organization has been evolving ever since its inception,
we have really changed in this last half decade. Some of those
changes, intended to enhance the effectiveness of the organization,
appear sometimes to burden its structures, and sometimes even disturb
the delicate balance among the various components of what we still
believe is a correct premise – that security is indivisible.

The OSCE’s three dimensions have provided each of us with something
to hang on to. Today the equilibrium among our three pillars begins
to wobble because of the centrifugal effect of so much criss-crossing
of priorities and interests. There’s an uncomfortable shift in
balance.

This is why Armenia does not think reform should be taboo nor do we
consider the reform process a wasteful exercise. The Herald Tribune
even raised these points this morning. No large, complex
organization, private or public, can maintain its relevance and
improve its performance simply by assuming that all is well. At the
OSCE, our greatest challenge is to alter the experience of some
delegations who find that the playing field is uneven. An
organization based on consensus presumably believes in a level
playing field. It is not a matter of being and feeling equal, rather
of having an equal right to defend our interests.

Because this unevenness becomes more apparent and more problematic at
the level of institutions and missions, believing in enhancing
ODIHR’s autonomy and effectiveness, we have attempted to seek in
ODIHR greater evenhandedness, transparency, non-selectivity, and
region-blindness particularly in its election-related activities.

As for OSCE missions, Armenia has already raised the issue, secure in
the very satisfactory, beneficial and cooperative performance of the
office in Yerevan. But we believe that as their numbers, mandates and
operations evolve, the whole missions system needs an adjustment to
reduce the perception of favorite tracks and sometimes
quasi-permanent dependency. The ultimate benefit of any mission will
be evident when that mission, having completed its work, makes itself
redundant. That is why we emphasize capacity building as the next
priority for the Yerevan office.

Mr. Chairman, as I reflect on the priorities of the organization as a
whole, I must address the CFE, a foundational issue and one that
plays an important role in the edifice of military strategic security
for the area. Presently it is in trouble. We are a state party and
the effective functioning of a Treaty in full implementation is
essential to our national security. Frankly, we are deeply concerned
by our neighbor Azerbaijan blatantly and unapologetically exceeding
by substantial numbers its holdings of TLEs. It is in this sense that
the reinvigoration of the CFE and its adapted successor is vital for
all state parties.

It seems our whole region is getting ready for an electoral year. In
Armenia, we concluded parliamentary elections in May and scored quite
a satisfactory rating in the eyes of the international community. My
government has every intention to maintain the momentum in the
Presidential elections coming in February. These, at a time when
Armenia is socially, economically a new country and we are seeing the
return of hope and optimism.

Finally, something on the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh
conflict.

On the one hand, through successive meetings of Presidents and
Foreign Ministers, we have arrived at a working document that can
serve as the basis for a preliminary agreement. Today, we met with
the top diplomats of the co-chair countries whose concern is that we
preserve what we have achieved and go further.

We understand and appreciate their special attention and their
recognition of the progress made in this process.

That document addresses the core issue – the security of the people
of Nagorno Karabakh, through self-determination – as well as the
issues of refugees and territories that came about as a result of
that self-determination struggle.

Unfortunately, outside of the negotiation process, there is another,
contradictory and disheartening reality. First, there are
militaristic calls ringing from the highest levels of Azerbaijan’s
leadership; second, Baku’s systematic, organized hate propaganda has
reached frightening levels within Azerbaijan. Third, Azerbaijan’s
willful obstruction of international envoys entrusted with monitoring
the conflict and the region is threatening to upset the fine balance
that we have sustained, and fourth, their active and aggressive
search for alternative international forums in which to present their
case, rebuffs their responsibility to compromise.

As hopeful as we are that a negotiated settlement is possible, this
hostile atmosphere concerns us. Armenians believe there will be no
new wars in our region. I know this because we won’t start it, and
they know they can’t win it. There is no military solution for this
conflict. The only solution is one based on compromise, and in that
sense, this document denies each side their maximalist desires and
focuses instead on a sensible, respectable, acceptable solution that
can be explained to ordinary people.

And will make it possible for ordinary people to reconnect over time
and across political boundaries in a space split by war and hatred.
For this to happen, the extraordinary people, those endowed with the
power to lead must demonstrate vision and instill trust, re-create a
Caucasus space and contibute to the region’s stability and
prosperity.

In this context and as members of this broad and inclusive European
organization, we look enviously at the countries of Europe, all of
whom, even those who were shaken to the core by the transformation of
the world order, have found ways to place problems onto an agenda,
without allowing those problems to abort the agenda. Perhaps we in
the Caucasus will be next in adopting such European approaches to
regional problems.

Mr. Chairman, as we prepare to welcome Finland, and hopefully soon
after that Kazakhstan, perhaps I can even say the unmentionable: it’s
never been more true than today that this organization’s annual
meetings have never been just formal get-togethers. It is at times
like this, when there are 6 or 7 daily headlines about the real
tensions in the OSCE space, that we can be thankful that we do have
this forum and we can commit to continuing to work to adapt it to our
ever-increasing demands.

Yuri Manukyan: "We Are Slightly Inclined Towards Authorities"

YURI MANUKYAN: "WE ARE SLIGHTLY INCLINED TOWARDS AUTHORITIES"

Panorama.am
16:17 15/11/2007

"We have decided to support Serzh Sargsyan during the presidential
elections because we know very well what it means to destroy homes
and lose a motherland. This fear forces us to be in a team that
will ensure stability," United Communist Party (UCP) Chairman Yuri
Manukyan told reporters today. In his words, they have applied to
other communist parties in writing to run in the elections with a
single communist candidate but none has responded. After that UCP
has decided to support the candidacy of the prime minister.

"We are neither opposition, nor authorities in power but we are
slightly inclined towards the authorities," UCP chairman said, also
saying that they had told before the parliamentary elections that
in case the Republicans and the Prosperous Armenia develop right
relations, the opposition would have nothing to do, which happened.

Asked why they cooperate with the Republicans instead of Dashnaksutiun
with social orientation, Yuri Manukyan answered: "Dashnaksutiun is
socialist just in words. They do not act in the socialist field." He
forgot that the same may be said about the Republicans.