Baku And Ankara Agree On Some Gas Terms

BAKU AND ANKARA AGREE ON SOME GAS TERMS

UPI.com
Feb. 2, 2010 at 11:20 AM

BAKU, Azerbaijan, Feb. 2 (UPI) — Baku and Ankara have agreed on
the price of gas from the first phase of the Shah Deniz gas field,
though further talks are needed, energy officials said.

Ankara has sought to allay concerns from the Azeri government regarding
the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Meanwhile, both sides have
sat idle on the transit terms and revenues for natural gas heading
to Europe across Turkey.

Rovnag Abdullayev, the head of the State Oil Co. of Azerbaijan
Republic, said both sides have made headway on talks regarding gas from
the first phase of the Shah Deniz field, the Trend news agency reports.

"We have agreed upon questions concerning the gas price in the first
stage," he said. "The question the gas price in the second stage has
not yet agreed upon."

Ankara had complained that the current price it pays for Azeri gas
is unfair.

Both countries are positioning themselves as major players in the
regional energy sector. Azerbaijan sits on some of the largest natural
gas deposits in the world, with roughly 30 trillion cubic feet of
reserves on hand. Turkey, meanwhile, is set to host Russia’s South
Stream gas pipeline and Europe’s Nabucco pipeline, which could rely
on Azeri gas.

Afghanistan: Partial Clarifying Of The Strategy

AFGHANISTAN: PARTIAL CLARIFYING OF THE STRATEGY
Gagik Harutyunyan

"Noravank" Foundation
01 February 2010

The logic of the global policy is mostly conditioned by the
developments in South Asia. So it is not surprising that on December
1, 2009, the address of the US president Barak Obama at the military
academy at West Point devoted to the Afghanistan issues was at the
centre of attention of the analysts and the journalists.

President’s decisions. The key items of Barak Obama’s address are
as follows:

The terms of the US troops withdrawal from Afghanistan were set:
it is supposed that this process will start in July 2011.

At the same time it is supposed to defeat and rout al-Qaeda1 before
the withdrawal of the troops to protect the US and its allies from
terrorist. With this purpose president Obama signed a decree to
dispatch to Afghanistan 30 thousand additional troops and to help
strengthening Afghanistan security forces in order they could fight
the Taliban.

Alongside with the withdrawal of the troops it is supposed to pass
the reins of government to the Afghani authorities and to start
negotiations with the so-called "moderate Talibans" in order to calm
down the situation.

The importance of Afghanistan and the necessity to keep on working
with that country were especially mentioned.

The commentators mention that the Afghani "road map" of the US
president in its essence resembles the programme on withdrawal of the
American troops from Iraq. At the same time the claiming of the terms
of the troops’ withdrawal at some extent brings to the conclusion
that new US "relaxation" policy2 continues and in this context the
address pursued definite propaganda goals.

Propaganda elements. It is remarkable that while speaking about 9/11
and the reasons of war in Afghanistan and those who are guilty of
that the US president alongside with al-Qaeda and Taliban mentioned
the USSR. According to Obama al-Qaeda came to power in Afghanistan
after the war conducted by the Soviet Union in 1979-1989. Meanwhile
it is known that al-Qaeda and Osama bin Landen were "created"
by the American and Pakistani special services in the last period
of war against the Soviet army when there were no doubts about the
withdrawal of the Soviet troops from Afghanistan. The fact that the
president touched upon the USSR is simply conditioned by the fact that
at present in mass media often a comparison is made between the wars
of the USSR and USA in Afghanistan. Particularly, some commentators
present the data of the western sociological agencies according to
which Afghanis considered president Najibullah (the later was a Soviet
protege and had governed the country just for 6 years after which he
was overthrown by mujahidin in 1992 and in 1996 he was executed in
Kabul) their best leader in the 20th century. It is not surprising
because the Soviets besides the severe military actions had also
carried out large-scale economic and educational programmes and that
is why the parallels between the USSR and USA are not always to the
favour of the later. But in both cases it should be mentioned that
both super-powers met severe resistance in that peculiar country.

Situation in Afghanistan. In his address the US president considered
the situation in Afghanistan as rather hard: Afghani fighters are
dominant in 11 provinces of 34 and just from military point of view
the developments are very problematic for the US-NATO military forces.

It is characteristic that Obama mentioned that despite the negative
tendencies Afghanistan yet could not be considered lost for the United
States and this describes the American understanding of the issue.

The forecasts of the special services are also pessimistic. According
to the former CIA Station chief in Kabul and ex-vice-chairman of
National Intelligence Council Graham Fuller the plans of Obama to
reach the military dominance and then to leave Afghanistan "softly"
are almost unrealizable, and the new troops dispatched there would
only protect the military units which had already been there. Fuller,
the author of "The Future of Political Islam" book and one of the
best experts of the region, believes that there is no way to reassure
Pashto that "the Americans are friends and the Taliban is the enemy".

The new Commander of the US and NATO military contingent in Afghanistan
General McCrystal assesses the current situation as very hard and
demands for 80 thousand additional soldiers; as we know consequently
it was decided to send to Afghanistan 30 thousand soldiers. But taking
into consideration the fact that there are already about 70 thousand
soldiers in the country and the number of the national Afghan army
is about 100 thousand it should be stated that the number of those
who are involved in the military actions against Afghan fighters has
already exceeded the one it was in 1979-1989. Let us mention that
in Afghanistan, just like in Iraq, there are a number of companies
providing security, services, connections and communications with
rather shadow stuff working on outsourcing bases.

Further to the military issues the political situation in the country
is also rather anxious. According to information sources president
Hamid Karzai after being "re-elected" and strengthening his hand
began to demonstrate more independent behavior. In his statements he
expresses the idea that it is impossible to score a success only by
military means and he tries to conduct more realistic policy.

Particularly on December 3, 2009 in his interview to AP agency Karzai
expresses the intention to find common points with the spiritual
leader of the Taliban Mullah Mohammed Omar.

As we have already mentioned today, such a policy is accepted in
Washington but the impression is that the US administration is against
such processes to go without its strict control. As a result, the
traditional American "restrictive" mechanisms are being used against
Karzai: in authoritative American publications today one can often
meet materials where president Karzai and his high-ranking brother
are accused in being involved in drug traffic and various corruption
actions, as well as the results of the presidential elections are
questioned. As it is known the compromised allies are more obedient.

At the same time in such a situation the resentment is fermenting
not only in Afghanistan but also in their domestic political field.

Public mood in the United States. According to public opinion polls,
today 51% of the Americans believe that it is not rational to spend so
much human and financial resources on the war in Afghanistan as the US
does. About 42% are against sending additional troops to Afghanistan
and only 26% supports that decision.

It should be noticed that the post-crisis situation boosts the
formation of the pessimistic attitude in the US. It is suffice to
mention that the budget deficit in 2009 was $1.4 trillion, and the
national debt reached almost fantastic level – $12 trillion. Let us
add that the budget of the Pentagon for 2010 is $636 billion, and it
will cost the taxpayers additional $3 billion, i.e. $1 million will
be spent on one soldier annually.

In the circumstances concerned, in order to finance the war in
Afghanistan some American law makers offer to raise the taxes by 1%.

Such projects, of course, are not accepted enthusiastically in the
American society. At the same time a number of experts prove that
available means are not always spent in the optimal way: some facts
appear in the information field that the considerable part of the
humanitarian aid sent to Afghanistan is appropriated by the Taliban.

In order to compensate the scanty general resources in some way today
the American administration tries to "internationalize" the issue.

Internationalization of the issue. Information agencies mention that
on the days preceding the address Obama had talks with his British,
French and Russian colleagues. The US aspires to present the situation
in Afghanistan as an issue important for the international community
and to involve other countries in military and political developments.

At the same time the situation in South Asia turned into a matter
of concern for the countries of the region and the prospects of the
withdrawal of the Americans from Afghanistan causes even more anxiety.

But each of those countries reacts to the issue in its own way.

Chinese who regard South Asia as the "territory of their national
interests", successively reinforce their presence in Afghanistan.

Today "China Metallurgical Group" Corporation develops Ainkan copper
mine not far from Kabul. The cost of the works is about $3.4 billion
which is the largest investment project in Afghanistan today. In the
opinion of the director of the Central Asia and Caucasus Institute
Frederik Star, the US and NATO together carried out preparatory works
in order China conquer Afghanistan economically. It should be added
that judging by the materials in the mass media China is not going
to restrict itself to mainly economic plans.

There are some steps made by India as well: besides the "soft" tactics
(the construction of the parliament building in Kabul, extending
cultural contacts and etc.), Delhi also proposes to reinforce defence
of the northern and western borders of Afghanistan. It is obvious that
the main concern is the protection from the radical Islamists. Most
probably that Russia should also have such concerns and using its
partially preserved possibilities in Afghanistan it has to try to
create buffer zones in the border areas of the Central Asian countries.

All these testify that there is a tendency to shift Afghanistan issue
from the global plane and turn it into the regional issue. If this
tendency is materialized and the countries of the region start to
play key roles in the solution of the issues then it would be the only
chance somehow to regulate extremely chaotic and explosive situation
in South Asia.

1The names "al-Qaeda" and "Taliban" are a bit conditional: the fighters
struggling against the US and NATO are not unified on any spiritual
and ideological base and represent different tribal and ethnic groups.

2The awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to the US president (a little
hasty) is, at some extent, a component of the information provision
of that policy.

BAKU: Azerbaijan And Oman Expand Contractual-Legal Base For Cooperat

AZERBAIJAN AND OMAN EXPAND CONTRACTUAL-LEGAL BASE FOR COOPERATION

Trend News
02.02.2010 14:33

Azerbaijan and Oman will expand contractual-legal basis for
cooperation. This agreement was reached during Omani Foreign
Minister Yousuf bin Alawi bin Abdullah’s meeting with his Azerbaijani
Counterpart Elmar Mammadyarov in Baku today.

Receiving his Omani counterpart, who is on official visit to Baku,
Mammadyarov expressed his satisfaction with the current level of
bilateral relations.

He thanked the Omani leadership for its support to Azerbaijan in the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on the international arena.

Expressing his satisfaction with the Omani-Azerbaijani political
relations, Alawi bin Abdullah noted the need for development of
relations in economic, cultural and other spheres.

The sides also noted the importance of holding joint days of culture
to expand cultural cooperation between the two countries.

Armenian Legislation Doesn’t Specify Timeline For Protocols Ratifica

ARMENIAN LEGISLATION DOESN’T SPECIFY TIMELINE FOR PROTOCOLS RATIFICATION

Tert.am
17:06 ~U 01.02.10

After the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia ruled that
the Protocols correspond to the Constitution, the RA President must
send those Protocols to the National Assembly for discussion. It
turns out that RA legislation, as well as the country’s main law,
the Constitution, doesn’t specify a timeline for sending the Protocols
to parliament.

"Such timelines are outlined neither by the laws or by the RA
Constitution. Inter-parliamentary relations are more so dependent
on political expediency and there’s no legal demand here," said
Constitution expert Vardan Poghosyan, while speaking to Tert.am.

According to Poghosyan, the RA Constitution doesn’t define not only
the deadline in sending the Protocols to parliament, but also the
deadline for them to be discussed in parliament.

"It’s that way in the rest of the world; the situation is the same
in Turkey’s legislation [with respect to a lack of a deadline],"
added the expert.

`Ari Tun’ project: new and improved in 2010

`Ari Tun’ project: new and improved in 2010

Noyan Tapan
29.01.2010

YEREVAN: The RA Ministry of Diaspora will continue and enlarge the
`Ari Tun’ project starting from May 2010.

According to information from the Department of Pan-Armenian Programs
of the RA Ministry of Diaspora, more Diaspora Armenian youth will be
visiting Armenia in 2010 and applications have already been sent from
Canada, Australia and Russia.

In July-October 2009, 313 Diaspora Armenians from Egypt, Turkey,
Russia, Syria, Georgia, Ukraine, France, Germany, Israel, Czech
Republic, the USA, Belarus, Iran, Australia, Argentina and Kazakhstan
visited Armenia within the framework of the `Ari Tun’ project. The
project was sponsored by the Iraqi Armenian Society of America,
`ArmenTel’ CJSC, Yerevan Brandy Factory and `Ashtarak Kat’ CJSC.

As Head of the Department of Pan-Armenian Programs Zhenya Azizyan told
`NOYAN TAPAN’, this year’s program will be more organized, taking into
account last year’s flaws and experience. There will be some
fundamental reforms and the participants will range from 13-20 years
old.

As an addition to this year’s requirements, participants will be
required to present a doctor’s note regarding their health condition
within 10 days prior to their visit to Armenia.

It is envisaged to broaden the locations of families selected to host
the youth in Armenia. Last year, there were only host families from
Yerevan and four provinces near Yerevan.

The Ministry has already prepared the 2010 `Ari Tun’ project and will
present it to the RA Government in early February.

The Ministry of Diaspora has also undertaken the initiative to create
a separate website for the `Ari Tun’ project with news, announcements
and other information. The website will give participants the
opportunity to communicate in Armenian. For instance, today, the young
participants of the `Ari Tun’ project from the CIS communicate with
each other through the Russian language `Odnoklassniki’ website. The
youth from other countries don’t have that opportunity due to the
language barrier. However, Georgian youth have befriended Maxim from
France and Sayat from Turkey on `Odnoklassniki’.

The project participants organized an `Ari Tun’ project photo contest
in Georgia. `It is important to keep the youth’s patriotism and
connection with the Homeland alive,’ said Zh. Azizyan, adding that the
Ministry keeps in touch with last year’s participants. The Ministry
receives hundreds of letters of gratitude from the youth and their
families. Summing up the results of the `Ari Tun’ project in
July-October 2009, Azizyan informed that the project participants
-received free entrance visas and medical aid -were provided with food
and transportation to travel in and out of Yerevan -were permanently
accompanied by employees of the Ministry and road police officers
during the trips out of Yerevan -attended interactive courses on
patriotism at 5 public schools of Yerevan-the courses were conducted
by skilled educators in collaboration with the `Education without
Borders’ non-governmental organization, -participated in Armenian
dance courses conducted by chief stage director of `Berd’ dance
ensemble, president of the National Dance Union of Armenia, candidate
of pedagogical sciences Karen Gevorgyan, -visited the Mother See of
Holy Echmiadzin, the museum-institute of the Armenian Genocide, the
Tsitsernakaberd memorial, Matenadaran, the National Gallery of
Armenia, the History Museum, house-museums of Sergey Parajanov,
Martiros Saryan, Yeghishe Charents and Hovhannes Tumanyan,
historical-cultural monuments, including the Sardarapat memorial,
Zvartnots, Khor Virap, Oshakan, Mughni, Saghmosavank, Geghard
monastery complex and the pagan temple of Garni, as well as the
military institute after V. Sargsyan and military units of Lusakert
and of Special Significance, -watched the play put on by the Armenian
theater of Georgia, the film `Dead Pigeon’, participated in the `Folk
Dance’ television program of `Shant’ television, -met with heads of
provinces of Ararat, Aragatsotni and Gegharkunik, youth organizations
and clubs within the framework of visits to the provinces,
-participated in the events organized by the districts of Yerevan with
the participation of the host families, -had meetings with rector of
Yerevan State University Aram Simonyan, rector of the Armenian-Russian
(Slavonic) University Armen Darbinyan, students and administration of
the State Linguistic University after V. Bryusov, as well as
cross-stone sculptor Varazdat Hambartsumyan, folk singer Haykazni,
boxers Vakhtang Darchinyan and Syuzi Kentikyan, -visited the annual
`Digitech-2009′ international exposition of information, advanced and
telecommunication technologies and `ArmenTel’ CJSC -received
accessories, including a shirt, hat and bag with the `Ari Tun’ logo,
an `ArmenTel’ mobile phone card, the encyclopedia entitled `Armenia’s
wonders’. As for gifts, they received the `Book Song’ published by the
RA Ministry of Diaspora, a booklet-VCD of the address by RA President
Serzh Sargsyan to the project participants and other books and
souvenirs.

In addition, farewell ceremonies were organized on the last day of
each group’s visit with the participation of RA President Serzh
Sargsyan, Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, Minister of Defense Seyran
Ohanyan, Mayor of Yerevan Gagik Beglaryan, head of the Armavir
province Vardges Hovakimyan and other officials and renowned
individuals.

The Ministry also organized concerts with the participation of
well-known performers and groups from the provinces within the
framework of farewell events. The project participants were given
certificates, host families were granted letters of gratitude. There
were also quizzes on patriotism, as well as song, dance and recitation
contests.

Ambassador Aznavour Met With Swiss Parliamentarians

AMBASSADOR AZNAVOUR MET WITH SWISS PARLIAMENTARIANS

Lragir.am
29/01/10

On January 27, the Armenian ambassador to Switzerland, Charles Aznavour
met with the co-chairs of the Armenian-Swiss parliamentary group of
the Swiss National Council Wally Leonberg and Dominick de Buman.

In the course of the meeting, issues regarding bilateral cooperation
between Switzerland and Armenia in economic, social and cultural
spheres were discussed. The Armenian ambassador underscored the
current political mutual understanding between Armenia and Switzerland
and Armenia’s willingness to develop economic relations. The RA
MFA reports.

Armenia Should Set Terms For Protocols Ratification

ARMENIA SHOULD SET TERMS FOR PROTOCOLS RATIFICATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.01.2010 13:16 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia is experiencing a crucial period, said Hayk
Babukhanyan,the leader of Constitutional Right Union party.

"Two ongoing processes – normalization of relations with Turkey
and Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement process -can have fatal
consequences for Armenia," he told a news conference on Friday.

"Turkey hit a deadlock after the RA Constitutional Court delivered its
ruling on the Protocols envisaging normalization of relations between
the two countries. To gain some concessions on Karabakh from Armenia,
Ankara is trying to drag out the ratification of the Protocols,"
Babukhanyan said.

"Armenia should stop following Turkey’s rules of play and urge it
to ratify Protocols till March 1, 2010. If Turkey doesn’t agree,
it will be us to take up the language of preconditions," he concluded.

Atom Egoyan: It’S A Question Of Passion

ATOM EGOYAN: IT’S A QUESTION OF PASSION

Kelowna.com
Friday, January 29th, 2010 | 1:01 pm

OTTAWA – Atom Egoyan, the Canadian auteur of a unique kind of cinema –
intellectual, chronologically fractured explorations of the dualities
of truth and lies, of the viewer and the viewed – is talking about
the day he had to shoot the killer bee scene in the TV series of
Friday the 13th.

It was 23 years ago, and Egoyan was an emerging young talent, a
University of Toronto graduate whose early films, Family Viewing and
Next of Kin, were sometimes playful examinations of family, intimacy,
and technology – themes he would continue to explore in later films.

But he also had to make a living, so he hired himself out to do TV
shows: The Twilight Zone, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, and the pilot
of the TV version of the iconic horror series.

"I remember one scene," Egoyan said. "I came the closest I ever came to
a nervous breakdown on that film because there as a scene where this
maniac grabs a bee’s nest and throws it into the cab of a truck where
this young woman is screaming and she’s being stung to death by bees."

Egoyan decided he wanted a shot from the bee’s point of view, from
inside the truck.

But the director of photography refused to get into the truck even
though the insects were male drones that don’t sting. So Egoyan –
already feeling under pressure because he was behind on the seven-day
shooting schedule – decided to film the scene himself.

"I got into the cab of the truck and the bee-keeper released the
bees, and the actress started screaming, and I was there moving like
a bee, the next thing I remember was people knocking at the window
and looking out and seeing the arc lights and the shadow of the crew,
and I literally didn’t know where I was. I was so discombobulated.

"And I thought, `This is very far from what I thought I’d be doing with
my life right now: having this woman screaming beside me, pretending to
be a bee, and feeling like I was going to be fired. It wasn’t where I
thought I would be when I applied to the arts council five years ago’."

Such is the life of the Canadian auteur, and even more so in the case
of Egoyan, whose themes of duality arise in his own career as well:
the auteur in a horror truck, the art house darling with a couple
of Oscar nominations, the director of cerebral enigmas like Exotica
and Adoration who is also courted by Hollywood to make big-budget
thrillers.

It’s not a new story, but as Egoyan enters the heartland of middle
age – he turns 50 in July – he says he is more careful than ever
about what he wants to do.

Egoyan was in Ottawa to help launch a book about his 1991 movie
The Adjuster. The book, written by Tom McSorley, the head of the
Canadian Film Institute, is one of a series of University of Toronto
Press examinations of Canadian cinema, and it makes a case for The
Adjuster as a watershed film. Starring such familiar performers as
Elias Koteas, Maury Chaykin, Jennifer Dale, Don McKellar and Arsinee
Khanjian (Egoyan’s wife and frequent collaborator), it tells the
story of an insurance adjuster and his relationship with his clients.

"The primary strategy of uncertainty, of mystery, combined with a
jigsaw puzzle narrative structure to contain and enact it, will be
developed further in subsequent films," McSorley writes.

Egoyan remembers the movie as coming at what he calls "a privileged
moment in English Canadian cinema." Canada was coming out of the
so-called tax- shelter era, when movies were made for financial rather
than artistic reasons. Patricia Rozema’s I’ve Heard the Mermaids
Singing (1987) had been invited to the Cannes Film Festival. Egoyan’s
own Family Viewing was picked up for distribution. A personal story
like The Adjuster – inspired when the Egoyan family home and furniture
store in Victoria burned down and Egoyan became curious about the
job of the man who came to assess the damages – could get made.

"It couldn’t be made now because too many people would interfere," he
said. "You would second-guess yourself as opposed to just being able
to react intuitively to this material, which is why it is hopelessly
obscure for some people and very unusual and I think quite purely
cinematic."

Egoyan was born in Cairo to Egyptian-Armenian parents – his name
commemorates Egypt’s first nuclear reactor – and he was raised in
Victoria. He moved to Toronto to go to school, and then started making
short films. The Adjuster was part of a career he describes as "very
incremental" – he’s made only 12 feature films since his 1984 debut
with Next of Kin, and much of his work has come under the radar of
big-budget financing.

He said he was inspired by Quebec director Jean-Pierre Lefebvre,
who said the budget of a film should reflect its intended market.

Egoyan says that’s all changed now.

"The problem today starts with young filmmakers wanting fame
immediately, and with technologies like YouTube, you have (the)
potential of a lot of people watching your material," he said. "It’s
all about how many hits you’re going to get. An Atom Egoyan couldn’t
exist. I don’t know who I would be in today’s world."

There’s another side to Egoyan’s career, however, one reflected in
his latest film, Chloe. Due out in March, it stars Amanda Seyfried,
Julianne Moore and Liam Neeson – it’s the film Neeson was making when
his wife, Natasha Richardson, died in a skiing accident in Quebec –
in a story about a woman who suspects her husband is unfaithful and
hires a prostitute to try to seduce him. It’s a remake of a French
film, and Egoyan did not write the script: he was hired by producer
Ivan Reitman to direct it.

Egoyan has received such offers before, especially after the success of
his commercial breakout, Exotica, in 1994. At the time, he moved to Los
Angeles and signed on to direct a thriller, to be called Dead Sleep,
for Warner Brothers. He calls it "the most confusing year of my life."

"I was meeting actors and meeting executives, and everyone was
speaking very intelligently about this script and it felt like (the)
right environment for me, until I realized that I wasn’t going to
wind up making that film. It was going to be in constant development."

He was rescued when American author Russell Banks – "bless his soul"
– pressured him to make a film out of his novel The Sweet Hereafter,
another dark story about a group of schoolchildren who die in a bus
accident. Egoyan was nominated for Academy Awards for his direction
and his screenplay of the 1997 film.

The studio interest got more intense, but Egoyan said he has learned
that the excitement often leads to disappointment. He had just finished
talking with fellow director David Cronenberg, who spent a year on
a project with Denzel Washington and Tom Cruise – a thriller to be
called The Matarese Circle – only to have the plug pulled.

"You can just waste a lot of time," Egoyan said. "And I made a promise
to myself now that I’m going to be turning 50 that I’m not going to do
this any more unless the project will actually get made. Chloe almost
didn’t. A French studio (StudioCanal) came in to underwrite it, or
there would have been a problem. Dramas are hard to finance right now.

I continue to read scripts and books, but if I don’t think there’s
a chance of getting it made, I’d rather spend time on my own projects."

It’s a different kind of cinema, of course. "My sensibilities as
a writer are very idiosyncratic and I have to be very protective
and understand the audiences for that film are more limited for an
audience than a film like Chloe. " But cinema isn’t his whole life.

He also directs opera and does art projects, like an installation for
the opening of Bell Lightbox and Festival Tower, the new headquarters
of the Toronto International Film Festival.

"It’s a question of what I’m passionate about," he said. "What’s
interesting … about the film The Adjuster that (is) it was made
passionately . .. you can feel that when you watch the film. And
that’s what you want to feel. "

Zaatar Bread, At The Bagel Shop?

ZAATAR BREAD, AT THE BAGEL SHOP?
By Robb Walsh in Robblog

Houston Press (blog)
Fri., Jan. 29 2010 @ 10:58AM

You won’t find Middle Eastern specialties like zaatar bread or
Armenian flatbread at your average bagel bakery. But Arnold’s Bagels,
a new business located in the same Westheimer shopping center as
Phoenicia, is not your average bagel store. That’s because Arnold,
the half-Armenian and half-Jewish baker, is from Iran.

He bakes plain, wheat, sesame, everything, cinnamon raisin and
blueberry bagels. A dozen are $8.95. One toasted with cream cheese
is $2. A breakfast bagel sandwich with egg, bacon and cheddar is $3;
with smoked salmon, it’s $4.29. A large coffee is $1.65, but Arnold
recommends an Armenian coffee for $2. It’s like Turkish coffee,
only better.

Arnold apologized that he didn’t bake fresh bagels every hour, but
he does bake fresh Armenian flatbread coated with sesame seeds every
hour. He supplies Phoenicia with the stuff. He makes zaatar bread
for himself and his wife, but there is often some around if you crave
the stuff.

Unfortunately, there are no zaatar-coated bagels — yet.

An Unacknowledged Genocide

AN UNACKNOWLEDGED GENOCIDE
By Harry Hagopian

Ekklesia
11122
27 Jan 2010

Today marks the observance of the International Day of Commemoration
in memory of the victims of the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and other
mass atrocities around the world. The sadness and horror evoked by
this occasion is felt particularly strongly by the descendants of
the victims of unrecognised genocides.

As historians have asserted on the basis of ample archival evidence
(), this first genocide of the last
century was in fact perpetrated by the Ottoman Turkish government
between 1915 and 1923 when it systematically and relentlessly targeted
and killed Armenians within its Empire.

Ultimately, well over one million ethnic Armenians, who incidentally
were Ottoman and later Turkish citizens, lost their lives.

As an Armenian born after this grisly period of our history,
I often wonder how our forbears managed to persevere in the face
of such immense suffering and adversity. Not only did they, their
families and friends, undergo the most harrowing experiences, they
also managed to pick themselves up and rebound from the devastation
of their orphaned situations.

It is due to their intrepid steadfastness and belief in their
collective identity as Armenians, that we – the younger generations –
can now lead our lives more freely and with more confidence.

But what does this say about modern-day Turkey? Equally importantly,
what does it say of those across the world who still resist tooth
and nail the idea of genocide – any acts of genocide, that of the
Armenians or subsequent ones – with denial and who debase human life
and dignity for spurious political and economic considerations?

How can we possibly claim to defend a political order based on human
rights and common decency on the one hand only to stifle it on the
other? Do deniers not recall George Santayana, a principal figure
in classical American philosophy, asserting that "those who do not
remember the past are condemned to repeat it" (in The Life of Reason,
Volume 1, 1905).

As the American NPR broadcaster, Scott Simon, wrote in ‘Genocide’
is a Matter of Opinion, there are times when one has to utter the
word ‘genocide’ in order to be accurate about mass murder that tries
to extinguish a whole ethnic group. That is why the slaughter of
a million Tutsis in Rwanda is not called merely mass murder. This
is also why any politician who goes to Germany, for instance, and
describes the Holocaust of European Jews merely as ‘terrible killings’
would be reviled without mercy and even prosecuted without appeal.

President Obama assumed the high moral ground during the US
presidential primaries by stating clearly that the Armenian people
deserved "a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian genocide
and responds forcefully to all genocides".

But on Armenian Remembrance Day on 24 April 2009, his written statement
from the White House referred twice to the Armenian genocide as medz
yeghern – translated literally as "great catastrophe" rather than
"genocide". Many American politicians still refrain from using the
‘g-word’.

However, debates are intensifying along with speculation on the
possibility that the US Congress in April may finally recognise the
Armenian genocide. The Turkish government, which still talks about the
"confusion" of 1915-23, is lobbying hard against this.

Once again we will witness a showdown between realpolitik and the
truth: in other words, between contemporary political expediency and
the burden of past atrocities. All too often the former seems to win.

Does this not sadly alert us – believers and humanists alike – how
the values of our global world today often avoid words such as truth,
conscience and honour?

On 24 April 2010 we will be six years shy of a century of denial
that – no matter whether individual, collective or institutional –
still contaminates the truth. Is it therefore not high time to put the
record straight? Is it not time for Turkish officials to put jingoism,
let alone misplaced pride or fear aside by recognising this unfortunate
chapter of their Ottoman history during World War One? Is it not time
for the Turkish judicial system today to stop invoking Article 301
of the Turkish Penal Code and charging reporters or writers simply
because they refer to the massacres of Armenians as genocide? Is it
not time also for the Turkish President and Prime Minister to prove
their EU-friendly credentials by mustering the political fortitude
-let alone the moral rectitude – to acknowledge past aberrations?

Moreover, is it not time for the world community to embark upon
a veritable phase of genocide education by underlining the eight
stages of genocide which culminate in denial – as elaborated by Dr
Gregory H Stanton in his Eight Stages of Genocide in 1998 when he was
president of Genocide Watch? Or as the chartered clinical psychologist
Aida Alayarian elucidated in her book Consequences of Denial, does
the denial of the Armenian genocide not deprive its victims of the
opportunity to make sense of their experience, as well as rendering
Turkish society unable to come to terms with its past, and therefore
with itself?

Such recognition is not solely for the sake of Armenians. After all,
I consider this genocide a historically-recognised reality, even if
some governments dither, equivocate and refuse to admit to it for
reasons that have more to do with political weakness than historical
truthfulness.

No, it is also for the memory of all those righteous Turks who
assisted, harboured and supported Armenians during this wounded chapter
of history. But as a firm believer in forgiveness and reconciliation,
I hold that it is ultimately for the sake of both Armenians and Turks
alike so they can begin the painful but ineluctable journey toward
a just closure of this open sore.

————

(c) Harry Hagopian is a former executive secretary for the
Middle East Council of Churches (MECC). He is now an ecumenical,
legal and political consultant for the Armenian Church. As well
as advising the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and
Wales on Middle East and inter-faith questions, Dr Hagopian is
involved with ACEP, the Paris-based Christians in Political Action
(). His own website is Epektasis
()

http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/
http://www.armenian-genocide.org/
http://www.chretiensenpolitique.eu/
http://www.epektasis.net/