Elon Musk decides against buying Twitter

Save

Share

 15:47, 9 July 2022

YEREVAN, JULY 9, ARMENPRESS. US billionaire Elon Musk has terminated his deal to purchase Twitter social network, TASS reports citing CNBC television channel.

According to CNBC, “Musk wants to end his deal to buy Twitter, according to a letter sent by a lawyer on his behalf to the company’s chief legal officer.”

A copy of the letter was published on the official website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission. In the letter, attorney Mike Ringler charged that “Twitter has not complied with its contractual obligations.”

On April 25, Twitter executives announced that Musk would acquire the company for $44 billion. On May 13, Musk announced he’s putting his takeover of Twitter “temporarily on hold,” saying that he wants more details about how many of the social platform’s accounts are fake or spam.

He said he needed to make sure fake accounts “do indeed represent less than 5%” of Twitter’s users. Such an estimate was given in the company’s report, published on May 2. According to the entrepreneur, there are currently more than 20% of fake accounts on the social network.

According to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, if the billionaire decides to terminate the agreement, he will have to pay the company a $1 billion fine. If Twitter initiates the termination, Musk will receive a compensation. The closing date for the deal is set for October 24.

As Armenia moves to open border with Turkey, Azerbaijan closes its own

July 5 2022
Heydar Isayev, Ani Mejlumyan Jul 5, 2022

Turkey and Armenia have agreed to partially open their mutual land border, which has been closed for nearly three decades.

The two countries announced on July 1, in identical statements, that they had agreed to “enable the crossing of the land border between Armenia and Turkey by third-country citizens visiting Armenia and Turkey respectively at the earliest date possible.”

The border has been closed since 1993, when Turkey closed it in support of Azerbaijan during the first war over Nagorno-Karabakh.

Following the second war, in 2020, Turkey and Armenia began to explore a process of normalizing their relations. The two sides appointed special envoys for normalization in December and they met for the first time in January.

July 1 was the fourth meeting between the two envoys, Ruben Rubinyan of Armenia and Serdar Kilic of Turkey. After the initial meeting in Moscow each of the subsequent meetings has been in Vienna, with no mediators. The border opening agreement was the first concrete result from the talks.

Rubinyan and Kilic also agreed to commence direct air cargo trade between Armenia and Turkey “at the earliest possible date” and “discussed other possible concrete steps that can be undertaken towards achieving the ultimate goal of full normalization between their respective countries.”

The statement also reiterated the agreement “to continue the normalization process without preconditions.”

The border opening could come soon: In a July 4 interview on public television, Rubinyan said: “I consider it logical that these arrangements should be implemented during this summer.”

The Turkey-Armenia normalization process has been conducted in parallel to another diplomatic effort, negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan over a peace agreement to formally end their conflict. That latter process has yet to achieve any results.

While the two processes are ostensibly separate, and Armenian officials insist that they are independent from one another, they have obvious resonances with one another. Turkey is a close ally of Azerbaijan, and Turkish officials regularly weigh in on the Armenia-Azerbaijan negotiations.

“We always state that Armenia now must respond to these well-intentioned approaches and we do encourage these,” Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said on June 20, referring to the talks with Azerbaijan. “We see that the Armenian administration is under pressure by radicals within the country as well as the diaspora outside.”

In the interview, Rubinyan was asked if Kilic had linked the two processes. “No, these two processes are separate,” he said, adding that recent statements by Turkish officials could lead to contrary impressions, “which can not positively affect the settlement process.” Rubinyan also denied that pressure from the protests of the domestic opposition, which get substantial support from the diaspora, was influencing the course of the negotiations.

More questions about the linkage were raised when Azerbaijan, on the same day that Turkey and Armenia made their announcement, said it was closing its border with Turkey.

On July 1, Azerbaijan’s State Border Service announced that it was closing its narrow, 13-kilometer border with Turkey. That was the only one of Azerbaijan’s land borders that had been open; those with Russia, Georgia, and Iran have been closed since the start of the pandemic.

The border service cited COVID as the justification for closing the border, noting that the Cabinet of Ministers had prolonged the “special quarantine regime” in the country until September 1. But that announcement was made on June 20 and did not mention the Turkish border.

The border was closed so suddenly that many Azerbaijanis hoping to cross were stranded there.

The implausible COVID explanation led some to speculate that the real reason was the Armenia-Turkey announcement.

President Ilham Aliyev “couldn’t stand the softening between Turkey and Armenia so he shut the border, just like he increased the gas price for Turkey in 2008” when Turkey and Armenia also were pursuing an ultimately failed plan to reopen the borders, wrote activist Giyas Ibrahim on Facebook. In response to the post, however, many noted that Ankara-Baku ties are much closer now than in 2008 and Baku would have other ways of registering its disapproval.

Azerbaijani pro-government media only covered the Turkey-Armenia announcement as straight news without commentary. In Turkey, too, there was little official comment of the Azerbaijani border closing, with the governor of Turkey’s Igdir district confirming the news and saying they are “trying to understand what’s going on.” Turkey’s embassy in Baku told local news outlet Qafqazinfo that the decision was made by Azerbaijan but did not comment further.

Aliyev has said he favors the process of Armenia-Turkey normalization. “We are talking about the possible opening of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. If the Armenian-Azerbaijani border can be opened, there is no need for the Turkish-Armenian border to remain closed,” he told journalists in February 2021. “However, this is Turkey’s own decision. Azerbaijan does not have any special opinion on this issue. Moreover, whatever happens for the benefit of Turkey, it is also for our benefit.”

While Armenia and Turkey say that the talks are being conducted “without preconditions,” analyst Areg Kochinyan told RFE/RL that Turkey does de facto have one precondition: “The process should be acceptable for Azerbaijan,” he said. 

Ani Mejlumyan is a reporter based in Yerevan.

Heydar Isayev is a journalist from Baku.

 

Mkhitaryan participates in first training session with Inter Milan

Mkhitaryan participates in first training session with Inter

Save

Share

 12:05, 7 July 2022

YEREVAN, JULY 7, ARMENPRESS. Armenian midfielder Henrikh Mkhitaryan held his first training in Inter.

Inter has already started the pre-season training preparations for the forthcoming 2022/23 season. 

Mkhitaryan also participated in the first training session.

Henrikh Mkhitaryan officially joined Inter on July 2 after leaving AS Roma.

U.S Should Stop Military Aid to Azerbaijan, Says Rep. Sherman

Rep. Brad Sherman


Representative Brad Sherman, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Congressional Armenian Caucus, voiced his disagreement with the Biden’s Administration’s decision to waive Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, which among other measures, restricts U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan.

“We should not abandon Section 907 and provide any assistance to oil-rich Azerbaijan, which has unleashed an aggressive war. The aid we provide is not large, but I think it is important diplomatically, so it should be stopped,” Sherman, a California Democrat, told Voice of America.

In his opinion, American aid for humanitarian projects in Artsakh should be increased, and Armenia should be given the opportunity to be included in the “Millennium Challenge” program.

“The World Bank ranked Armenia among those with above average income. I would like it to be so, but we have to take into account the economic consequences of the terrible war, the coronavirus epidemic,” Sherman said.

On a related note, President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan said on Monday that the U.S. can play an important role in normalization of relations between Yerevan and Baku.

“At a time when favorable conditions have been created for the establishment of stable peace and economic progress in the South Caucasus, we believe that the United States can play an important role in the normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the opening of communications, and the establishment of people-to-people ties,” Aliyev’s said in a message to President Joe Biden on Independence Day, the Russian TASS news agency reported.

Aliyev also expressed opinion that the U.S. can make a significant contribution to the process of preparing a peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Voting on electing Prosecutor General of Armenia launched in Parliament

Save

Share

 16:00, 29 June 2022

YEREVAN, JUNE 29, ARMENPRESS. The voting on electing Prosecutor General of Armenia started in the Parliament at 16:00.

The voting is being held in a closed format and will last until 17:00.

The ruling Civil Contract faction has nominated Anna Vardapetyan for the Prosecutor General.

Since March 2, 2020, Anna Vardapetyan has been serving as assistant to the prime minister of Armenia.

The term of office of Prosecutor General Artur Davtyan ends on September 16.

Parliament elects Anna Vardapetyan as new Prosecutor General of Armenia

Save

Share

 17:21, 29 June 2022

YEREVAN, JUNE 29, ARMENPRESS. The Parliament of Armenia elected Anna Vardapetyan as the new Prosecutor General of Armenia.

The voting was held in a closed format.

70 MPs participated in the voting and all voted in favor of her candidacy.

Anna Vardapetyan has been nominated by the ruling Civil Contract faction.

The opposition factions did not participate in the voting.

The swearing-in ceremony of the new Prosecutor General will be held on September 15.

Since March 2, 2020, Anna Vardapetyan has been serving as assistant to the prime minister of Armenia.

The term of office of Prosecutor General Artur Davtyan ends on September 16.

Environmentalists Speak Out As Armenia Restarts Controversial Gold Mine

June 30 2022

On June 18, new amendments in the country’s mining code went into force. Among other things, they allow companies to carry out mining with environmental impact assessments more than a year old, as long as the delay was caused by reasons that include “civil disobedience.”

Development of the Amulsar mine was suspended in 2018 following large protests against the project’s potential environmental damage. Since then its prospects have fallen and risen as the government appeared unable to reconcile the need for investment and jobs in the country with the serious environmental consequences that the mine threatened, and the resulting popular opposition to the project.

The government has not said formally whether it intends to restart the mine project. But activists monitoring it say that all signs point in that direction. 

After parliament passed the law earlier this year, a group of activist organizations appealed to the government to revoke it. “This legislative change is, in fact, a restriction on the constitutional right to hold public meetings, rallies, marches, demonstrations, as well as the right to participate in decision-making,” the February 10 letter read. “It is obvious that the legislative change is primarily related to [the] Amulsar gold quartzite mine development project.”

The activist organizations appealed to President Vahagn Khachaturyan to not sign the law but he did on June 18, saying that experts consulted by his office confirmed that the law was constitutional. 

Amulsar is one of the largest foreign investments in Armenia. The company that operates it, Lydian International, says that it has already invested $300 million in the project and claims that the mine would contribute $488 million to the state budget through taxes and royalties over its 11-year operation, amounting to 1.4 percent of the country’s gross domestic product. 

But many experts and environmentalists believe that the mining process in Amulsar, close to the resort town of Jermuk, will harm the local ecology and could even pollute Lake Sevan, Armenia’s largest source of fresh water. 

As an opposition politician, Nikol Pashinyan also opposed the project, the contract for which had been signed in 2007. When Pashinyan became prime minister following 2018’s “Velvet Revolution,” activists, encouraged by the rise to power of someone they saw as an ally, rallied for a new wave of protests against the mine that summer. The prosecutor general’s office launched a criminal case in August 2018 against the operator of the mine, Lydian Armenia, accusing it of damaging the environment by unauthorized mining operations.

The government commissioned a new audit of the project, arguing that the initial environmental impact assessments were tainted by the close association with Lydian Armenia of the experts who carried them out. When the new audit was released, in August 2019, it largely supported the previous assessments, though it did identify some additional risks. 

Pashinyan initially said the new audit was positive enough to go ahead with the project, but a public backlash forced the government to backtrack and promise that it would produce yet another environmental impact assessment. 

Lydian responded by threatening to sue for damages of up to $2 billion if the government pulled out of the project. Demonstrations began again to gather steam, with clashes between police and protesters in August 2020. A month later, however, the war with Azerbaijan started and the issue largely dropped off the public agenda. 

The criminal case, meanwhile, was terminated in December 2021. No new environmental impact assessment was ever carried out, and the new law means that Amulsar can move forward using the most recent assessment.

Sources in the current and former governments have told Eurasianet, on condition of anonymity, that economic needs in the post-war period have meant the likelihood of the mine reopening has significantly increased. 

Western embassies, in particular the British and American, have long supported the project. United States Ambassador Lynne Tracy visited the mine site in April and “encouraged an expeditious and transparent resolution of outstanding disputes around the project,” the embassy said in a statement. She also “welcomed Lydian’s commitment to upholding the highest international labor and environmental standards and noted the potential for the project to serve as a significant driver of growth for Armenia’s economy.”

Environmental activists disagree. 

“[T]here is abundant evidence of serious violations of a wide range of rights in the development of the Amulsar gold mine, from substantive and procedural environmental rights to social, economic and political rights of affected individuals and communities,” wrote CEE Bankwatch Network, an organization monitoring projects in the region funded by international financial institutions, in a new report.

It recommended that the Armenian government revoke all licenses to operate the mine, initiate an “independent expert assessment of the costs and benefits” of the project, then “take this assessment into account to ensure that negative impacts are duly identified and prevented and that local populations and communities may directly benefit from the project if it is finally pursued.”

By Eurasianet.org


Chess: Madrid: Karen Grigoryan is the third prize winner

NEWS.am
Armenia –

The representative of Armenia Karen Grigoryan took part in one of the chess events held in Madrid near the World Chess Candidates Tournament.

In the blitz tournament, the Armenian grandmaster scored 7.5 points out of 9 and took the third place.

The title of the winner was won by the Spaniard Eduardo Iturrizaga, who scored 8 points. The second place was taken by Cuban Yusnel Bacallao Alonso with 7.5 points.

Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan: “Baku is trying to legitimize another war”



  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Pashinyan’s online press conference

“Baku wants to legitimize another war, therefore it refuses dialogue, publicly accusing Armenia [of refusing to participate in the negotiations]”, the Armenian Prime Minister said. After a five-month break, Nikol Pashinyan held another online press conference, already the fourth in this format.

This caused indignation of more than 30 media resources, which decided to boycott the press conference and did not send questions to the prime minister’s office. Their joint statement said that the online format was justified during the pandemic, but now was the time to restore direct contact with journalists.

PM Pashinyan’s press conference began with an address to the media that had boycotted it. The prime minister said that he had chosen this form of communication, considering it an opportunity, not coercion, and “there will always be a reason for a boycott”.


  • PM Pashinyan: “Any alternative to peace will be disastrous – both for NK and Armenia”
  • «They shot us in foot»: Pashinyan blames former government for failed Karabakh negotiations

Speaking about the complicated relations with Azerbaijan, the Prime Minister of Armenia stressed that the unblocking of economic and transport communications in the region is the obligation of both countries. This is not a unilateral demand to Armenia, but a point of a joint statement signed with Azerbaijan on the cessation of hostilities in Karabakh.

“But Azerbaijan is trying to resolve the issue in a way that would leave Armenia in the blockade”, Pashinyan stressed.

According to him, the choice of routes for unblocking the region is small, a maximum of five options can be considered. But Baku is trying to politicize this technical issue, the prime minister believes:

“No one can be more interested in the issue of [unblocking] routes than we are․ Because we are faced with the task of sending as much international transit as possible along these roads, which will bring income to Armenia”.

“It is not so easy to be a direct, honest, reliable partner for both Russia and the West, our duty is not to betray anyone” – Armenian PM Pashinyan’s interview to Al-Jazeera TV channel

According to the Prime Minister, Baku wants to legitimize a new war.

It is for this reason that the Azerbaijani side refuses dialogue, Pashinyan and cited a few examples. A meeting of the Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia and the Assistant to the President of Azerbaijan was scheduled for June 27 and was canceled by Baku. Armenia offered to meet at the level of foreign ministers, but has not received an official response yet.

Meanwhile, the President of Azerbaijan earlier accused Armenia of allegedly rejecting a proposal to hold a trilateral meeting in Tbilisi at the level of the foreign ministers of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. And the Armenian Foreign Ministry had to refute this information.

According to Pashinyan, Baku demonstrates the same approach in connection with the work of the commission on the delimitation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. He believes that Azerbaijan is trying in this way to create the impression that Armenia is avoiding participation in the work of the commission:

“However, reality is different. During May, the Azerbaijani side canceled or postponed this meeting twice”.

Shot from the press conference

According to the prime minister, preliminary discussions have already been held with Azerbaijan on the peace treaty and there are agreements to continue work. Therefore, Pashinyan considers “very strange” Baku’s statements that “Armenia is dragging out negotiations on a peace agreement.”

“As a result of the discussions, it was decided that the officials of Armenia and Azerbaijan should keep in touch with each other, but we already have at least one such case when Azerbaijan boycotted the work contrary to the agreements,” Pashinyan stressed.

The provisions of the agreement and a number of other issues are yet to be discussed. The Prime Minister assures that there is no other document at the negotiating table, except for the one already published.

This is a five-point document from Azerbaijan on the principles on which the peace treaty should be based. The Armenian side announced that there is nothing unacceptable in it, but it does not cover the entire agenda of issues to be discussed, and added its 6 points.

Political observer Hakob Badalyan believes that Azerbaijan is trying to solve its main task – “to dictate its own agenda and its own conditions for the peace process”

During the press conference, Pashinyan also spoke about the transfer of new territories to Azerbaijan. After the completion of the construction of an alternative road to the Lachin corridor, which connects Armenia with NK, the territories outside the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region will come under the control of Azerbaijan. This refers to the city of Berdzor (Lachin), as well as the settlements of Agavno and Sus.

“We are solving the problems of the inhabitants of Lachin [the government of Armenia], they, of course, should be provided with apartments. In fact, families do not live in Lachin today. I think that the problems of the residents of the village of Aghavno will be resolved at the expense of the government of Nagorno-Karabakh․ I can’t say anything about Sus, I don’t have any information at the moment”.

According to the prime minister, the purpose of building a road bypassing Lachin is to provide a “more reliable” road connection between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Pashinyan has confirmed that there is a preliminary agreement on the construction of the road and the transfer of territories to Azerbaijan. But the prime minister believes that there can be no question of this happening this or next week.

According to the 2020 tripartite declaration of cessation of war, the route change should take place by agreement of the parties and after three years.

According to Pashinyan, negotiations on this topic are now in progress with Russian partners, since the new route, according to the trilateral statement, should be controlled by Russian peacekeepers.

“Just because we are paying a lot of attention to the Russian-Ukrainian war does not mean that we are not paying attention to other issues” – US Assistant Secretary of State in Yerevan

According to Azerbaijan, 38 Armenian prisoners of war are still being held in Baku. Armenian human rights activists claim that there are many more of them. During a press conference, Pashinyan stated that all those who have reliable evidence that they were captured and can now be on the territory of Azerbaijan are considered “forcibly displaced”. Even a list of these people was compiled, but the prime minister did not say how many people were on it.

Pashinyan emphasized that more than 90% of the confirmed prisoners were captured after the entry of Russian peacekeepers into NK, in their zone of responsibility:

“Azerbaijan’s policy of not returning prisoners is aimed at discrediting the activities of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh, in the Lachin corridor”.

He believes that the Armenian side, Russia and the international community should make additional efforts to return the prisoners. The Prime Minister assesses their retention in Azerbaijan as a violation of the November 9, 2020 tripartite ceasefire statement:

“It says that prisoners of war, hostages, and other detainees must be returned to their homeland. There are people who were captured before November 9, and there are those who were later captured. But the November 9 statement does not say that this clause does not concern them”.

The new CRRC Armenia survey has determined what worries the Armenian people the most: the need to strengthen the army, poverty, and the peace agreement with Azerbaijan

“There is an opportunity for a positive shift, and we must do everything to use it,” the prime minister said about the normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations.

According to him, if negotiations are ongoing, then there is “a realization that a settlement is possible,” and we need to move forward in small steps.

However, Pashinyan believes that some statements that come from Turkey have a negative impact on this process, create a negative background. In particular, he touched upon the wording “Zangezur corridor”.

This refers to the road through the territory of Armenia, which will connect Azerbaijan with its exclave Nakhichevan. Azerbaijan and Turkey call this road a “corridor”. The Armenian side has repeatedly announced that it agrees to unblock communications, but with the preservation of sovereign control over these roads, since the term “corridor” implies a loss of sovereignty.

At the same time, Pashinyan stressed that dissatisfaction with the statements of the Turkish side does not mean the end of the dialogue with the Armenian side.

https://jam-news.net/armenian-prime-minister-pashinyan-baku-is-trying-to-legitimize-another-war/







RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/28/2022

                                        Tuesday, 
Pashinian Warns Of New War With Azerbaijan
        • Naira Nalbandian
Armenia - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian speaks on state television, 
Yerevan, .
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has claimed that Azerbaijan is torpedoing peace 
talks and preparing the ground for another war with Armenia.
“They are trying to create legitimacy for a new war,” he said in televised 
remarks aired late on Monday. “Whether they plan the new war in three months, 
three years or thirty years is a different issue.”
In that regard, Pashinian pointed to continuing Azerbaijani claims that Yerevan 
is reluctant to negotiate a peace treaty with Baku, demarcate the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border and open it to commerce. He said that the 
Azerbaijani side itself cancelled a fresh meeting of senior Armenian and 
Azerbaijani officials which was due to take place in Brussels on Monday. It has 
also not responded to an Armenian proposal to organize a face-to-face meeting of 
the foreign ministers of the two states, he said.
On Sunday Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev again implicitly threatened to 
resort to military action. He said that Armenia will “regret it” if it delays 
the border demarcation.
Aliyev voiced similar threats earlier this month when he warned Yerevan against 
continuing to oppose the opening of a land corridor connecting Azerbaijan to its 
Nakhichevan exclave.
Armenian officials again ruled out such an extraterritorial corridor afterwards, 
arguing that Armenian-Azerbaijani agreements brokered by Russia call for only 
conventional transport links between the two South Caucasus states.
Pashinian said on Monday that Baku itself is violating those agreements by 
breaching the ceasefire regime in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone and 
continuing to hold dozens of Armenian prisoners.
Pashinian adopted a conciliatory policy towards Azerbaijan following Armenia’s 
defeat in the 2020 war over Karabakh. He has since repeatedly promised that it 
will usher in an “era of peaceful development” for Armenia and the entire region.
Pashinian sparked weeks of antigovernment protests in Yerevan after signaling in 
April his readiness to “lower the bar” on the status of Karabakh acceptable to 
Armenia. Armenian opposition leaders accused him of helping Azerbaijan regain 
full control over the Armenian-populated territory.
One of those leaders, Ishkhan Saghatelian, claimed on Tuesday that Pashinian’s 
warning about a new war with Azerbaijan is aimed at discouraging Armenians from 
fighting for regime change. In a Facebook post, Saghatelian insisted that 
Pashinian’s removal from power is on the contrary the only way to “save Armenia 
and Artsakh from this destructive course.”
Opposition Leaders Set To Lose Parliament Posts
Armenia - Parliament vice-speaker Ishkhan Saghatelian leads an opposition 
demonstration in Yerevan, May 18, 2022.
The ruling Civil Contract party moved on Tuesday to dismiss a deputy speaker of 
the Armenian parliament and the chairman of one of its standing committees 
affiliated with the main opposition Hayastan alliance.
Hayastan’s Ishkhan Saghatelian holds one of the three posts of vice-speaker 
reserved for the opposition. The other opposition lawmaker, Vahe Hakobian, 
chairs the parliament committee on economic affairs.
A representative of Civil Contract’s parliamentary group, which controls the 
majority of seats in the National Assembly, said it has decided to strip them of 
their posts because of their continuing boycott of parliament sessions.
Saghatelian, Hakobian and the 33 other deputies representing Hayastan and the 
other parliamentary opposition force, Pativ Unem, began the boycott in April in 
advance of their daily demonstrations demanding Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s 
resignation.
Under Armenian law, a lawmaker can lose their seat if they skip, for 
“non-legitimate” reasons, at least half of parliament votes during a single 
semi-annual session of the National Assembly. The final decision to that effect 
is to be made by the Constitutional Court at the initiative of the parliament’s 
leadership or at least one-fifth of the deputies.
Parliament speaker Alen Simonian said on May 17 that he is considering 
initiating such an appeal to the court. According to the parliament’s press 
office, over a dozen opposition lawmakers could be formally accused of 
absenteeism at that point.
Simonian told reporters on Tuesday morning that he and other pro-government 
lawmakers will discuss the issue at a meeting later in the day.
After the meeting, the ruling party announced no decision to strip any 
opposition parliamentarians of their seats. It said instead that Saghatelian and 
Hakobian will only lose their posts.
Speaking shortly before that announcement, Saghatelian again dismissed the 
government threats to terminate his and his colleagues’ membership of the 
National Assembly.
“We are out to fight against that gang,” he told News.am. “For us, the 
[parliamentary] mandate is only a tool for struggle. If the authorities want to 
strip us of our mandates let them do that. That will not affect our struggle in 
any way.”
Saghatelian announced earlier in the day that the opposition forces will hold 
their next antigovernment rally on Friday.
Pashinian Admits Failure Of ‘Judicial Reforms’
        • Naira Nalbandian
Armenia - Parents of soldiers killed in the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh protest 
outside the Supreme Judicial Council building in Yerevan, May 26, 2022.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian acknowledged late on Monday that a scandal 
sparked by leaked audio featuring Armenia’s top judicial officer has undermined 
the credibility of judicial reforms declared by his administration.
But Pashinian did not say whether he believes Gagik Jahangirian, the 
controversial acting head of the country’s Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), 
should resign.
Ruben Vartazarian, the SJC’s previous chairman, publicized on June 20 a 
14-minute audio clip which he secretly recorded during a dinner meeting with 
Jahangirian in February 2021. The meeting took place two months before 
Vartazarian was controversially suspended by other SJC members amid rising 
tensions with Pashinian.
In the recording full of profanities uttered by him, Jahangirian can be heard 
seemingly warning Vartazarian to resign or face criminal charges.
Jahangirian claimed late last week that he simply tried to trick Vartazarian 
into resigning as head of the state body that nominates judges and can also 
dismiss them. He dismissed calls for his resignation voiced by opposition and 
civil society groups.
Armenia -- Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian chairs a meeting with senior 
law-enforcement and judicial officials, Yerevan, November 30, 2020.
Pashinian did not comment on those calls when he was asked about the scandal 
during a live televised appearance. Instead, he attacked Vartazarian, saying 
that the recording also raised questions about the former SJC chairman.
“I always say that our biggest problem is the judicial system, that we don’t 
have real successes here,” Pashinian told Armenian Public Television.
Asked whether the leaked audio scandal has cast a shadow over his declared 
judicial reforms, Pashinian said: “I think so.” He expressed hope that an 
Armenian law-enforcement agency will properly investigate the content of the 
recording and its implications.
The Investigative Committee reportedly interrogated Vartazarian on June 23. But 
it has still not opened a formal criminal case in connection with Jahangirian’s 
secretly recorded comments.
Critics say Jahangirian must be not only sacked but also prosecuted for what 
they see as blackmail and illegal interference in the work of law-enforcement 
bodies.
The SJC indicated last week that it will not even launch disciplinary 
proceedings against its embattled head. But one of its members, Davit 
Khachaturian, announced on Monday that the judicial watchdog has set up a 
working group that will look into the leaked audio and determine whether it 
warrants such proceedings.
Armenia - Ruben Vartazarian, head of the Supreme Judicial Council, at a news 
conference in Yerevan, June 20, 2022.
The SJC formally deposed Vartazarian as its chairman and member on June 23. The 
official reason for the move was a recent newspaper interview in which he 
claimed that Jahangirian joined the watchdog in January 2021 in breach of 
Armenian law.
Vartazarian fell out with Pashinian in late 2020 as the prime minister’s 
political allies accused him of encouraging Armenian courts to free arrested 
government critics. Vartazarian denied the accusations. He says that he was 
indicted and suspended in April 2021 as part of government efforts to replace 
him with Jahangirian, a former prosecutor widely seen as a figure loyal to 
Pashinian.
Pashinian’s political opponents dismiss his stated efforts to reform the 
Armenian judiciary as a smokescreen for increasing government influence on 
courts. Pashinian and his political allies say the reforms are on the contrary 
aimed at strengthening judicial independence.
U.S. Reports Russian Boycott Of Talks On Karabakh
        • Tatevik Lazarian
US - The Department of State building in Washington, DC, April 20, 2020.
Russia has boycotted a multilateral discussion on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict 
initiated by the United States within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group, the 
U.S. State Department said on Tuesday.
“The U.S. OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair spoke with her counterparts today to discuss 
the future of Nagorno-Karabakh,” tweeted the department’s Bureau of European and 
Eurasian Affairs.
“It's unfortunate the Russian Co-Chair [of the Minsk Group] did not accept the 
invitation. We look forward to the Minsk Group’s continuing work,” it said.
The State Department division did not specify who else took part in that 
discussion or give any other details.
The U.S., Russia and France have for decades jointly tried to broker an 
Armenian-Azerbaijani peace accord in their capacity as the co-chairs of the 
Minsk Group. According to Russian officials, Washington and Paris stopped 
working with Moscow in that format following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Armenia -- The U.S. and French co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group and other 
diplomats meet with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, Yerevan, December 
14, 2020.
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Karen Donfried denied the Russian claims when 
she visited Yerevan on June 18. She told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service that the 
Minsk Group remains a “very important format” for Washington.
The Russian Foreign Ministry dismissed Donfried’s assurances on June 22. A 
ministry spokeswoman said the U.S. and France caused “irreparable damage” to the 
mediating format as a result of their broader attempts to isolate Russia on the 
international stage.
Visiting Baku two days later, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov insisted 
that “the Minsk Group stopped its activities at the initiative of the American 
and French co-chairs.”
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian suggested on Monday that Lavrov’s comments 
contradict one of the provisions of his joint declaration with Russian President 
Vladimir Putin adopted in April. It stresses “the importance of using the 
potential and experience of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship institute in 
accordance with its international mandate.”
ARMENIA - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (right) is about to meet with 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian in Yerevan, June 9, 2022.
“I think that this contradiction needs to be clarified,” Pashinian said, adding 
that the Minsk Group is not dead.
Incidentally, the secretary of Armenia’s Security Council, Armen Grigorian, met 
with the group’s the French co-chair, Brice Roquefeuil, in Paris on Tuesday. A 
statement by the council said the two men agreed on the need for achieving a 
comprehensive Karabakh settlement “under the aegis of the OSCE Minsk Group 
co-chairmanship.”
In recent weeks, Armenia’s leaders have called on the U.S., Russian and French 
mediators to resume their joint peace efforts.
By contrast, Azerbaijani officials and President Ilham Aliyev in particular have 
repeatedly questioned the need for the group’s continued existence. Aliyev has 
said that Azerbaijan’s victory in the 2020 war with Armenia put an end to the 
Karabakh conflict.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry urged Yerevan 
to “stop wasting time on restoring a format the effectiveness of which was 
always low.”
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2022 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.