‘Leaving This Heavy Burden For Future Generations Irresponsible’: Na

‘LEAVING THIS HEAVY BURDEN FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS IRRESPONSIBLE’: NALBANDIAN ON PROTOCOLS

Tert.am
12.10.09

After the Armenian-Turkish Protocols signing ceremony on Saturday,
October 10, Armenia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Edward Nalbandian,
gave thanks to the Swiss, American, Russian, and French leaders for
showing their support for the process by saying:

"Today you were standing by our side, being a participant in the
Protocols signing ceremony, and you justifiably share the outcome of
the work, as well as the responsibility in future achievements."

As depicted by Nalbandian, the significant unwavering support and
assistance from the international community was vital for moving
the process forward, announced the Republic of Armenia Ministry of
Foreign Affairs press office.

Speaking about the process of the establishment of Armenian-Turkish
relations, Nalbandian noted, "Early on in the process, we knew about
those difficulties, those obstacles, which are present in this thorny,
but necessary, path leading us toward the future. But we also know that
leaving this heavy burden for future generations would be irresponsible
and unjustified."

Turkey and Armenia sign landmark accord… Eventually

Turkey and Armenia sign landmark accord… eventually
Hillary Clinton brokers deal after talks stalled at last minute

Robert Tait

The Guardian
The Observer, Sunday 11 October 2009

Presidents Serzh Sargsyan, Dmitry Medvedev and Ilham Aliyev at the
Commonwealth of Independent States summit in Chisinau, Oct 9, 2009.
Photograph: Reuters

Turkey and Armenia last night finally signed a landmark accord to restore
ties and open their shared border after a century of hostility stemming from
the First World War mass-killing of Armenians by Ottoman forces.

But in an indication of the many pitfalls that lie ahead of its
implementation, the ceremony was marred by a three-hour delay due to
last-minute disagreements on the wording of statements, forcing the American
secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, to engage in intense discussions to
salvage a deal.

Ahmet Davutoglu, the Turkish foreign minister, and his Armenian counterpart,
Edward Nalbandian, signed the accord in Zurich, ending speculation that days
of angry protests might scupper the deal.

The accords mark a new chapter in relations after generations of bitterness
over Armenian claims of genocide by Turkish Ottoman forces nearly a century
ago. Under the agreement, the two countries will form a joint historical
commission to examine the issue.

The Turkish and Armenian parliaments must now approve the deal in the face
of opposition from nationalists on both sides and an Armenian diaspora which
insists that Turkey acknowledge the killings of up to 1.5 million Armenians
as genocide.

The agreement, the culmination of more than a year of intensive diplomacy,
will commit both countries to reopen their land border and restore
diplomatic ties, which Turkey severed in 1993 over Armenia’s occupation of
Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory claimed by Ankara’s ally, Azerbaijan.

Politicians and analysts have hailed the accord as a major breakthrough.
"It’s the beginning of a new era not only for Turkish-Armenian relations but
also for the entire Caucasus region, including Russia and Iran," said Cengiz
Aktar, professor of EU studies at Bahcesehir university in Istanbul.

"It won’t be easy to resolve the many sclerotic issues and there are no
quick fixes. But it’s an extremely important step."

Last week, Armenia’s president, Serzh Sargsyan, faced angry demonstrations
on a tour designed to sell the agreement to Armenian communities in the US,
Russia, France and Lebanon. Around 10,000 nationalists, some holding banners
reading "No to Turkish preconditions" and "No to concessions to Turkey"
protested in the Armenian capital, Yerevan.

Turkey admits many Armenians died in the final days of the Ottoman empire
but disputes the numbers, while claiming many were victims of disease. The
Turkish official narrative also insists many Turks were victims of Armenian
violence.

The agreement also commits Armenia to work with Azerbaijan towards a
resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute.

Some 30,000 people died after war broke out in the enclave in the early
1990s following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2009

Clinton basks in Turkey-Armenia accord, praise from Nobel-winning bo

Clinton basks in Turkey-Armenia accord, praise from Nobel-winning boss
By: Matthew Lee, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
10 Oct 09

LONDON – U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton basked in the
glow of praise from her Nobel laureate boss on Saturday after
spearheading successful efforts to salvage historic accords between
longtime bitter foes Turkey and Armenia.

President Barack Obama, who a day earlier was the surprise winner of
the Nobel Peace Prize, telephoned Clinton in Switzerland to
congratulate her on overcoming a last minute-hitch that threatened to
scuttle the Turkish-Armenian deals, a senior State Department official
said.

Clinton was headed to the airport in the Swiss city of Zurich following
an intense and frantic day of negotiations when she got the call from
Obama, the official said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity
because the call was private.

"He was very excited, he felt like this was a big step forward and
wanted to check in," the official told reporters aboard Clinton’s plane
as she flew from Zurich to London, the second leg of a five-day tour of
Europe and Russia. "He called to congratulate her and the team."

"We had a good night in Zurich," Clinton said on the plane.

For several tense hours in overcast Zurich, however, that was anything
but a sure thing.

Having come merely to witness Saturday’s signing, Clinton instead
became embroiled in a dramatic turn of events that began when both
sides balked at signing agreements on establishing diplomatic relations
and opening their sealed border after a century of enmity.

Both had objections to language in statements the side wanted to read
after signing the deals, concerns that burst into the open just minutes
before the ceremony was to begin at the University of Zurich in the
shadow of Switzerland’s snowcapped Alps.

Clinton’s motorcade had just arrived at the venue when it abruptly
turned around and returned to the luxury hotel where she had met
separately earlier with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and
Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian.

There she spoke by phone from the sedan in the parking lot, three times
with the Armenians and four times with the Turks. At one point, a Swiss
police car, lights and siren blazing, brought a new draft of the
Turkish statement from the university to the hotel for review.

After nearly two hours, Clinton and Armenian Foreign Minister Edward
Nalbandian met in person at the hotel and drove back to the university
where negotiations continued in the presence of Swiss and European
mediators and the foreign ministers of Russia and France.

About an hour later, Clinton and the others brokered a compromise under
which no statements would be read at the ceremony.

She said she had repeatedly impressed on the Turks and the Armenians
that the agreements, known as protocols, that had been negotiated over
months were too important not to be signed now. The protocols, she
said, should speak for themselves without additional statements.

"We just kept making our points," she said, referring to herself and
the top U.S. diplomat for Europe, Philip Gordon. "This needed to be
done."

"It’s just what you sign up for," Clinton said of her role."When you
are trying to help people resolve long-standing problems between
themselves, it is a very challenging process."

To take effect the agreements must be ratified by the Turkish and
Armenian parliaments and face stiff opposition in both countries, which
have a particularly bloody history.

The contentious issue of whether the killing of up to 1.5 million
Armenians during the final days of the Ottoman Empire amounts to
genocide is only hinted at in the agreement as is the matter of the
disputed Armenian-occupied enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan.

Turks have close cultural and linguistic ties with Azerbaijan, which is
pressing Turkey for help in recovering its land. Turkey shut its border
with Armenia to protest Armenia’s 1993 invasion of the territory.

Stepan Safaryan: Armenian Authorities Saw The Branch They Are Sittin

STEPAN SAFARYAN: ARMENIAN AUTHORITIES SAW THE BRANCH THEY ARE SITTING ON

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.10.2009 17:10 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Armenian-Turkish rapprochement based on current
Protocols becomes a warm-up in Karabakh settlement process," Heritage
faction MP Stepan Safaryan told a National Assembly September
9 briefing.

Authorities’ statements that Diaspora should achieve Genocide
recognition without RA support drive a wedge between Armenia and
Diaspora. "Allowing dissidence between Armenia and Diaspora means
sawing the branch one is sitting on," Safaryan said.

When asked by journalists why Heritage demanded President Serzh
Sargsyan’s resignation, he noted that signature of RA-Turkish Protocols
would mark the first step in that direction.

Hrant Bagratian: In Case Of Border’s Opening, Oligarchic Economy Of

HRANT BAGRATIAN: IN CASE OF BORDER’S OPENING, OLIGARCHIC ECONOMY OF ARMENIA WILL COLLIDE WITH NONCENTRALIZED AND DYNAMIC PRIVATE SECTOR OF TURKEY

Noyan Tapan
Oct 9, 2009

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 9, NOYAN TAPAN. In case of opening the
Armenian-Turkish border, the trade will enable to lower production
prices in Armenia.

However, as former Prime Minister of Armenia Hrant Bagratian said at
the October 9 press conference, "there is going to be an interesting
phenomenon which may make a mess of everything".

In his words, Armenia’s concentrated oligarchic economy will collide
with Turkish noncentralized, nonoligarchic, and dynamic private
sector. "We lack private entrepreneurs on a par with Turkish ones. At
first the Turkish capital will collide with Armenian oligarchs. But
the Turks are not so foolish to come here to develop Armenian private
entrepreneurs. Sooner or later the Turks will start operating through
these oligarchs, realizing that the greater the oligarchs’ power is,
the less developed Armenia will be," H. Bagratian said.

In his words, the average Turkish entrepreneur is much more dynamic,
competent and developed than the Armenian one. For that reason
we should get ready for economic relations. "It is for the first
time that we will rub shoulders with the Turks in the history of
millennial communication, while the Turks are more developed than we
are – in all respects," H. Bagratian noted.

Why Doesn’t The Price Of Bread Decrease?

WHY DOESN’T THE PRICE OF BREAD DECREASE?

Tert.am
12:05 08.10.09

An increase in the price of consumer goods in Armenia is usually
explained by external factors. Market vendors and producers respond
quite quickly to price increase in the international market for grains,
sugar, vegetable oil and butter — sometimes even by the next day.

>From time to time, the prices of these types of goods fall in Armenia’s
market, but, as a rule, Armenian market participants overlook this
detail.

The same is presently happening in the wheat market. When, in the
first half of 2008, the price of grains rose in international market,
companies Manana Grain (their portion in the market: 36.77%) and Salex
Group (portion: 42.05%), which hold a dominant position in the wheat
flour market, responded to the price increase quite quickly and as
a result, the price of bread rose.

Examining the bread, flour and wheat markets, the State Committee of
the Republic of Armenia for the Protection of Economic Competition
blamed the bread manufacturing factories for the rise in the cost of
bread, but not the flouring mills, which actually increased the cost
of flour.

During eight months this year, the average price for a tonne of wheat
exported from Russia was 163 USD (whereas in 2008, it was 282 USD
per tonne). According to the State Revenue Committee’s latest data
(January-June), average customs price per tonne of wheat imported
into Armenia was 253 USD instead of last year’s 263 USD, reports
Russian paper Commersant.

That is to say, though the price of wheat exported from Russia
dropped considerably this year, in Armenia, the drop was not as
considerable. However, when prices increase, the Armenian market is
quick to follow suit and raise its prices.

It should also be taken into account that the two major flour mills
in Armenia, one in the town of Baghramyan (belonging to businessman
and MP Samvel Alexanyan) and the other in village of Armash (owned
by wheat giant Manana Grain) don’t purchase flour from the villagers
but use f The drop in the price of flour in Russia and the unchanging
prices in Armenia’s domestic market must worry the Committee, since
under these conditions, abuse of one’s dominant position and agreements
which are potentially against competition are possible.

Canadian-Armenian Community To Protest Against Turkey-Armenia Protoc

CANADIAN-ARMENIAN COMMUNITY TO PROTEST AGAINST TURKEY-ARMENIA PROTOCOLS

PanARMENIAN.Net
08.10.2009 11:10 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Canadian-Armenian communities of Montreal and
Toronto will hold three protest rallies this Friday, Saturday and
Sunday to express their frustration and opposition to the signing of
"so-called" protocols that will guide the establishment and development
of relations between Turkey and Armenia, which was jointly announced
on August 31 2009 by the foreign ministers of Armenia, Turkey and
Switzerland.

The public protest in Montreal will take place on Friday October
9, 2009 at 9 PM in front of the Armenian Genocide monument in
Montreal (in the park on the corner of Avenue Henri-Bourassa and
L’Acadie). In Toronto, the Armenian community will first organize
a youth protest rally on Saturday October 10 2009 at 2 PM at Nathan
Phillips Square-Winston Churchill Statue/Speakers Corner. There will
also be a public gathering on Sunday, October 11, 2009 at 2 PM at
the Armenian Youth Centre of Toronto (50 Hallcrown Place, Victoria
Park Ave. and Highway Heroes). Armenians in Canada and around the
world believe in reconciliation but they are opposing the protocols
because they encourage the denialist ambitions of Turkey and abuse
the vulnerability of the Armenian Government vis-a-vis its economic,
social and geopolitical problems.

These protocols are especially adverse to the Armenian Nation’s
inalienable rights and interests. Turkey wants to hinder the
international recognition of the Armenian Genocide of 1915, by creating
historical sub-commissions to examine the events of 1915. Numerous
countries and organizations including the Canadian Parliament in
April 2004 and the Canadian Government in 2006, the International
Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) in June 1997, June 2006 and
October 2006, have recognized the Armenian Genocide.

The International Centre of Transitional Justice (ICTJ) that studied
the Armenian case requested by a similar historical sub-commission,
Turkish-Armenian Reconciliatio (TARC), has already concluded that
the events of 1915 constituted a Genocide.

Armenians also oppose other parts of the protocols which force
Armenia to accept the current borders of Turkey, thus validating the
dispossession of Western Armenia and waiving the right of the Armenian
Nation to negotiate fully over Armenian Genocide reparations. They
are also concerned that the protocols, which call for respecting and
ensuring respect for the principles of non intervention in internal
affairs of other states, territorial integrity and inviolability of
frontiers, but do not mention the equally recognised international
principle of self-determination, will jeopardize the self-determination
of the people of Nagorno-Karabagh and negotiations for a peaceful
settlement of that conflict.

The upcoming rallies in Montreal and Toronto are among a number of
public protests being held in Canada, across the world, as well as in
Armenia. Armenians around the world have organized protests against
the new wave of Turkish denialism. In Canada hundreds of Armenian Youth
gathered on Friday October 2 nd 2009 at the Armenian Community Centre
in Toronto and protested against these unfair protocols. Petitions
are being signed, and calls to redress the situation are also being
communicated to the President of Armenia, during the consultations
held this past week in cities across the world where large Armenian
communities reside.

Closed Borders Negatively Affect The Inner Competitiveness

CLOSED BORDERS NEGATIVELY AFFECT THE INNER COMPETITIVENESS
Nvard Davtyan

"Radiolur"
07.10.2009 18:50

The 30th sitting of the CIS Interstate Council on Anti-monopoly
Policy kicked off in Armenia today. The sitting features heads of
anti-monopoly bodies from about 14 countries. The participants discuss
most urgent issues that arise in the field of anti-monopoly policy
or defense of competitiveness.

Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan noted that although problems of
competitiveness differ in different countries, the exchange of
experience will be useful in helping to avoid repeating each other’s
mistakes.

"Market economy envisages equal conditions of competition. Any
deviation in this field creates problems," the Prime Minister said.

According to Tigran Sargsyan, the main problem in Armenia is the high
level of shadow economy, and not only the anti-monopoly organizations,
but also the government have something to do here. We have problems in
the field of tax administration. Closed roads also negatively impact
the internal competition. Problems become more tangible under the
conditions of the crisis. "However, the crisis provides an opportunity
to implement ambitions reforms, as well.

Ex-Official Concerned Over Actual Military Budget Cut

EX-OFFICIAL CONCERNED OVER ACTUAL MILITARY BUDGET CUT
Sargis Harutyunyan

le/1845045.html
06.10.2009

A former deputy defense minister expects the planned actual curtailment
of military spending envisaged by Armenia’s 2010 state budget to have
a negative effect on the country’s defense capability.

His concerns, however, are not shared by the Defense Ministry’s
chief financier, who says that the 30 percent reduction in spending
estimated in U.S. dollars reflects the corresponding depreciation of
the national currency that has taken place on the foreign exchange
market since the approval of the current year’s budget in late 2008.

The actual reduction, meanwhile, follows the general pattern of the
government’s request for the 2010 budgetary expenditures that it
plans to slash by nine percent citing the ongoing economic recession
and the resulting serious shortfall in tax revenues.

In an interview with RFE/RL on Tuesday, Vahan Shirkhanian, who served
as Armenia’s deputy prime minister and deputy defense minister in the
late 1990s, said this development is certain to have an impact on the
overall fighting capacity of the Armenian army which he described as
a complex and dynamic structure that has enjoyed a sufficient level
of funding in recent years.

"The [military] budget would grow by $100-120 million every year and
that could not but have its [positive] effect in the matter of ensuring
[the country’s] military security," he said. "But today we witness a
sharp increase of Azerbaijan’s military budget and it is reflected not
only in the increase in funding, but also in its purchasing modern
high-precision weapons… I consider it unacceptable that Armenia
cut its military spending."

Speaking to RFE/RL on the phone, the Defense Ministry chief financier
Colonel Vagharshak Avetisian said that the Ministry had submitted
a request for about 130 billion drams in next year’s budget, which
is nearly the same amount as the 2008 request for the current
year. However, he explained, considering the devaluation of the
national currency by nearly 30 percent, it turns out that the defense
budget in 2010 will be nearly 30 percent less.

At the end of 2008, when this year’s military budget was approved,
it was equivalent to $426 million. At the current dollar-dram exchange
rate, the same amount in drams will be equivalent to $335 million.

But according to Avetisian, in any case the depreciation of the
national currency will not affect the Defense Ministry expenditure
in the main directions.

"Even if some changes are made in terms of reduction, then our main
spending spheres and directions will never be affected by that. And,
naturally, if there is a need for reduction, we can make cuts in
capital construction, while the other expenditure items will not be
affected," said Avetisian.

Avetisian also downplayed the impact of the exchange rate on military
purchases abroad that are transacted in hard currency.

"Our surveys show that the current level of prices [for weaponry]
abroad is lower than it was during the past years," he said.

Avetisian also brushed aside the argument made by the former defense
ministry official that certain budget reductions might cause some
discontent mainly among senior command staff who will have to complete
harder tasks with less funding.

"We have made a budget request based on this year’s volumes. No changes
will be made in any spending direction. Moreover, there will be some
increase in money allowances," said Avetisian. "I can say that our
armed forces will be provided with everything that is necessary to
achieve our objectives at a given period of time."

http://www.azatutyun.am/content/artic

Armenians Of Greece Oppose Signing Of The Armenian-Turkish Protocols

ARMENIANS OF GREECE OPPOSE SIGNING OF THE ARMENIAN-TURKISH PROTOCOLS

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.10.2009 19:40 GMT+04:00

ARF Dashnaktsutyun Central Committee of Greece held a political
meeting in Athens on October 5. During the meeting representatives
of the Armenian community of Greece have expressed their protests
in connection with the protocols on normalization of Armenia-Turkey
relations. Ara Mankoyan introduced anti-Armenian provisions of the
Protocols and urged not to sign the Protocols.

"Protocols must not contain items suggesting that the Armenian side
abandon territorial claims. These protocols should not turn the
fact of the Armenian Genocide into subject of discussion and should
not be connected with the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, "
Ara Mankoyan said. He stressed that the Protocols contain all above
mentioned preconditions. According to him, establishment of good
neighborly relations between Armenia and Turkey is unrealistic in
the given circumstances.

"Why has the Armenian leadership had such a position in respect to
Turkey, especially given that Turkish officials do not speak of even
minimal guarantees of peaceful coexistence? Turkey in a hurry to sign
the Protocol in order to show the world that it is a country seeking
to establish good relations with neighboring countries, and thus
to overcome the resistance of the countries opposing its membership
in the EU, " Ara Mankoyan said. After the meeting, members started
collecting signatures against the adoption of the Armenian-Turkish
Protocols, Azad Or Athens newspaper reports.