New Armenian Law Could Be Setback For Religious Freedom

NEW ARMENIAN LAW COULD BE SETBACK FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

Catholic Culture
March 27 2009

Armenian human-rights advocates are expressing deep concern about
of new proposed legislation governing religious affairs. The
legislation, which has won preliminary approval in parliament,
would set restrictions on unregistered religious groups and on the
preaching of religious beliefs. Opponents told Forum 18 that the
proposal would be a "serious setback to the development of a modern,
progressive and liberal Armenia."

False Drams And Coins Are Worrying

FALSE DRAMS AND COINS ARE WORRYING

LRAGIR.AM
14:51:46 – 27/03/2009

On March 27, the Chief of the Police Department’s Organized Anti-Crime
Task Force Hunan Poghosyan presented to the reporters the 2008
report. According to it, the number of the crimes against economic
activities increased in 2008 counting 456 cases, whereas in 2007 the
number was 289. Hunan Poghosyan noted that the false drams and coins
cases are especially worrying. It is not clear yet, whether they
are prepared- in Armenia or abroad. But, Hunan Poghosyan notes the
falsification of the dram is not that much surprising, because they are
typed with printing equipments; as that of the coins, which is strange
and worrying as special technology is needed for their preparation.

Hunan Poghosyan stated that the number of corruption crimes
increased comparing to the last year too; in 2007 it was 171, while
in 2008-382. Hunan Poghosyan noted that 5 crimes were revealed in
the Nagorno-Karabakh, some of the organizers of which were people
registered in Armenia. These organized crimes caused a damage of 350
million for the NKR, 150 millions of which were recompensed through
the measures took up by the service.

Hunan Poghosyan noted that the corruption cases do not overlook the
police system either, in which connection, the Chief of the Police Alik
Sargsyan, according to Hunan Poghosyan, instructed them to struggle
against this phenomenon. Hunan Poghosyan noted that the corruption
is most developed within visa and passport department of the Police.

In the end, Hunan Poghosyan noted that it is difficult to struggle
for the law enforcers alone, and in order to raise the effectiveness
of the struggle the whole public’s involvement is needed.

The Armenian Genocide: Normalization Of Turkish-Armenian Relations C

THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE: NORMALIZATION OF TURKISH-ARMENIAN RELATIONS COULD RELIEVE OBAMA’S DILEMMA

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.03.2009 20:27 GMT+04:00

Barack Obama’s April 5-7 visit is a nod to Turkey’s regional reach,
economic power, unrivalled diplomatic contacts and status as a
secular Muslim democracy that has accommodated political Islam. "It’s
a symbolic piece of public diplomacy at a time maybe not of crisis,
but great uncertainty in US-Turkish relations," said Philip Robins,
a Middle East expert at Oxford University.

Turkey will not be the venue for Obama’s promised major speech in a
Muslim capital, but Lawrence Korb, senior fellow at the Center for
American Progress, said his stop there was still a way to emphasize
his message of reaching out to Muslims. Obama may unlock the kind of
goodwill generated by former US President Bill Clinton when he came
to Turkey in 1999, but risks dissipating it all if he uses another
G-word, genocide, to describe the fate of Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire in 1915.

"With the PKK [outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party] under control in
Iraq and the Americans at least not confronting Iran at the moment,
the Armenian issue is the thorniest," Robins said.

Ironically, Turkey and Armenia are perhaps as close as they have ever
been to normalizing ties and reopening the border. Omer TaÅ~_pınar
a fellow at the Brookings Institution, argues that accelerating
this process could relieve Obama’s dilemma. "This is exactly what
President Obama needs," he wrote, urging Turkey’s ruling party to show
"visionary statesmanship."

If the Armenian issue can be finessed, Obama has everything to gain
from reinvigorated US-Turkish ties, particularly when he is making
overtures to adversaries such as Iran and Syria. He has already
sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Middle East envoy George
Mitchell on visits to Ankara. "Turkey plays a pivotal role in this
region. If you are going down this route of cooperation and dialogue,
countries that have open channels like Turkey are the ones you want
to talk to," Today’s Zaman cited ," said Karim Makdisi at American
University of Beirut as saying.

Federation Council Of Russia Ratified Agreement On Preferential Supp

FEDERATION COUNCIL OF RUSSIA RATIFIED AGREEMENT ON PREFERENTIAL SUPPLIES OF SPECIAL EQUIPMENT TO CSTO MEMBER STATES

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.03.2009 15:09 GMT+04:00

Federation Council of Russia ratified the agreement on preferential
supplies of special equipment to CSTO Member States to equip law
enforcement agencies and special services.

The agreement signed by Collective Security Treaty Organization
(CSTO) leaders during a summit in Dushanbe on Oct. 6, 2007, regulated
cooperation issues in the sphere of military supply between law
enforcement agencies and special services of CSTO Member States.

Enjoy a safer web experience. Upgrade to the new Internet Explorer
8 optimised for Yahoo!7. Get it now.

Re-Burying The Dead And The Buried

RE-BURYING THE DEAD AND THE BURIED

Gibrahayer Nicosia  25 March-Alexander-Michael Hadjilyra
 [email protected] of the Armenian community of
Cyprus,  joined Archbishop Varoujan Hergelian accompanied by
clergies and deacons of the Armenian Church, in a solemn ceremony for
the reburial of the remains of 9 identified and 32 unidentified
Armenians previously exhumed. They were laid to rest, in accordance to
the rites of the Armenian Apostolic Church, last Sunday, 22 March
2009.

            Cypress trees were also planted on the
grounds of the cemetery, with many, kindly participating in the
throwing of soil with shovels.

            Before and after the ceremony, we
wandered through the cemetery grounds, located between the Law Courts
and the Wolseley Barracks, right next to the UN Buffer Zone. For me it
was a journey through time, as we were able to see the historical
tombstones, most of which dated to the late 19th and the early 20th
centuries. The majority of the graves belonged to deghatsi families;
indeed, some of the inscribed surnames  are apparently uncommon
today. Others were hard to read, because of the decay of the marble.

            My company were puzzled why Latin
writing was found on some tombs located to the north part of the
cemetery, but then I reminded them that it is customary to bury
Armenian Catholics to the right part of a cemetery, Armenian
Protestants to the left, and the Apostolics in the centre.  With
works expected to complete in about a month, an obelisk (houshagotogh)
will be bearing the names of the 463 buried there since 1877,
including the ones whose graves are still intact.

            The old Armenian cemetery appears to
have been in use as a burial ground since the 15th century, but
according to records of the Armenian Prelature it was officially
registered as a cemetery in 1877. The wall and the gate were erected
in 1888, and the Sourp Boghos chapel was built in 1892, in memory of
the cemetery’s benefactor, Boghos Odadjian, a Bolsetsi. Due to the
increase of ge number of refugees who fled to Cyprus – a new plot was
purchased to the west of Ayios Dhometios. The last burial, carried out
in 1931, was the 9-months old Bedros Aynedjian.

            In 1963, because of the widening of
Shakespeare street, about 100 graves had to be demolished and their
remains were trans-located to the Ayios Dhometios cemetery. After the
inter-communal troubles in 1963-1964, the historical cemetery was
abandoned due to its proximity to the buffer zone. Ironically, in 1974
the Ayios Dhometios cemetery fell within the buffer zone; for burials,
a special permission was required 24 hours in advance, with a limited
number of mourners attending. After the efforts of MP Vartkes
Mahdessian, visits there are allowed every Sunday. In 1998 the new
cemetery was built, to the north of Lakatamia-Ayii Trimithias road.

            The Sourp Boghos chapel has been
restored, its roof has been renovated, and the commemorative plaque in
front of the door replaced, however it still needs painting on the
inside. As of  this year, a small service will be held there on the
Sunday following Easter. We look forward to the completion of the
restoration works for the cemetery, hoping it will become a gem for
the region and the community.

AGBU’s 120 Branches And 27 Cultural Centers Function In 29 Countries

AGBU’S 120 BRANCHES AND 27 CULTURAL CENTERS FUNCTION IN 29 COUNTRIES OF WORLD

Noyan Tapan
March 24, 2009

YEREVAN, MARCH 24, NOYAN TAPAN. During Armenian General Benevolent
Union’s activity aimed at preservation of the Armenian nation AGBU
implemented a number of educational, cultural, social, humanitarian,
and church construction programs in Armenia. Many churches were
restored, centers for Armenian youth were organized, theological
seminaries were created with the assistance of Union benefactors and
with the efforts of Holy Etchmiadzin. It was mentioned at the March
24 meeting of NA Speaker Hovik Abrahamian and AGBU Chairman Perch
Sedrakian. The AGBU Chairman was accompanied by member of Union’s
Central Administrative Assembly Vazgen Yakubian and Director of AGBU
Armenian representation Ashot Ghazarian.

According to the report of the RA NA Public Relations Department,
H. Abrahamian attached importance to Union’s role in the issue of
preservation of the spiritual heritage for the future generations. He
welcomed the programs organized for the Diasporan Armenian youth aimed
at revealing Armenia, getting acquainted with the traditions, culture,
history, and strengthening their contacts with the homeland. In
Armenia-Diaspora cooperation H. Abrahamian attached importance to
the activity of the newly created Ministry of Diaspora in the issue
of working out and implementing joint programs.

P. Sedrakian presented the work done and spoke about Union’s future
tasks.

120 branches and 27 cultural centers of AGBU having more than 22
thousand members currently function in 29 countries. In spite of
the world financial-economic crisis, AGBU tries to implement all
envisaged programs.

P. Sedrakian said that AGBU already has a land plot of 1.5 hectares
in Nork, where an educational center is envisaged to be created,
which will continue the work of Melkonian Educational Institute. More
than 1000 Armenian students from various countries of the world can
study there every year, and it can become a unique international
intellectual youth center.

Talaat’s Black Book documents campaign of race extermination in 1915

Armenian Reporter, 13 March 2009

Full article with maps and data, see

Talaat’s Black Book documents his campaign of race extermination in 1915-17

"[Talaat stated that]. they had already disposed of three quarters of
them [Armenians], that there were none left in Bitlis, Van, Erzeroum,
and that the hatred was so intense now that they have to finish
it. . . . He said they would take care of the Armenians at Zor and
elsewhere but they did not want them in Anatolia. I told him three
times that they were making a serious mistake and would regret it. He
said, ‘We know we have made mistakes, but we never regret.’"

-8 August 1915 diary entry of conversations between Talaat Pasha and
U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau, United States Diplomacy on the
Bosphorus: The Diaries of Ambassador Morgenthau, 1913-1916, comp.,
ed., and intro. Ara Sarafian (Princeton and London: Gomidas Institute,
2004)

by Ara Sarafian

LONDON – A handwritten black book that belonged to Mehmet Talaat
Pasha, the Ottoman minister of interior in 1915, was published in
facsimile form in the end of 2008. It is probably the single most
important document ever uncovered describing the destruction of
Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in 1915-17. The Black Book draws on
Ottoman sources no longer available to answer many questions about
what those sources showed.

Looking through the Sifre Kalemi or cipher telegram collection at the
Prime Ministry Archives in Istanbul some years ago, I was struck by
the number of telegrams in 1915 from Talaat Pasha ordering the
deportation of individual communities, inquiring about the state of
convoys, and giving instructions for further deportations. What
emerged was a picture of a ruler obsessed with the progress of his
signature program. Much of the responses to Talaat’s inquiries were
not available. What the Black Book does is to summarize the data he
collected.

Ottoman archives

Turkish state intellectuals in recent years have insisted that the
1915 deportations of Ottoman Armenians were not part of a genocidal
exercise, but an orderly population transfer and resettlement. They
have insisted that Ottoman archives in Turkey today support their
contention. Yet, between them, they have only managed to cite an
amalgam of official deportation and resettlement regulations, certain
reports related to deportations, and no substantial account of what
actually happened to deportees.

Indeed, no historian working in Turkish archives has managed to
present a coherent picture of the deportation and resettlement of
Armenians from any region in the Ottoman Empire based on Ottoman
records. This is because Ottoman records do not support the official
Turkish thesis on the Armenian Genocide.

While there is broad agreement between Turkish archives and other
sources that thousands of Armenians were removed from their homes in
1915, there is no solid account of what happened to these deportees in
Ottoman records. However, foreign archives, such as the consular
records of the United States, give a better qualitative assessment of
actual developments than the available Ottoman documentation.

This absence of Ottoman records could seem perplexing, because
according to Ottoman regulations, Ottoman officials had to keep
detailed records of the deportation of Armenians, as well as an
inventory of their properties, as well as details of the final
settlement of the people concerned. The total absence of such
registers in Turkish archives today is therefore remarkable.

A handwritten book

The recent facsimile publication of Talaat Pasha’s Black Book may well
answer many of questions with the authority of Ottoman records. At 77
pages, the book includes a substantial section on the deportation of
Armenians in 1915-17. The book and its content were never disclosed in
Talaat’s lifetime, including in his posthumous memoirs published in
1921. After his assassination in 1921, the book was kept by his widow
and given to the Turkish historian Murat Bardakçi in
1982. Mr. Bardakçý made parts of the booklet public in Hürriyet
newspaper in 2005. The full account was not published until the end of
2008.

The significance of the Black Book lies in the authority of the owner,
the fact that its content was drawn from Ottoman administrative
records no longer available to historians in Turkey, and the actual
data that it gives about the deportation of Armenians. Neither the
book nor the data it yields bear clear dates, though Mr. Bardakçý
thinks that the figures refer to 1915-1916 – though I think that could
be the end of 1916 or even the beginning of 1917.

The state perspective

The data presented in this book can be considered to be a view of the
Armenian Genocide from the perspective of the state. This state
perspective still needs to be evaluated critically, which I am doing
in a separate study. The purpose of this article is to introduce the
core data that informed Talaat Pasha about the actual state of
Armenians.

The statistics regarding the destruction of Armenians in the Black
Book are enumerated in four categories covering for 29 regions
(vilayets and sanjaks) of the Ottoman Empire.

These statistics are supposed to reflect:

* The Armenian population in each region in 1914

* Armenians who were not deported (presumably 1915-16)

* Armenians who were deported and living elsewhere (1917)

* Armenians who were originally from outside the province they were
living in (1917)

>From these statistics, we can also have an idea of the number of
Armenians who were deported but not accounted for in 1917. Some of
these missing Armenians undoubtedly fled the Ottoman Empire, such as
those in the province of Van (where there was fierce resistance) or
parts of Erzurum (which fell under Russian occupation after the
Ottoman offensive collapsed in the east). However, very few Armenians
were able to flee in such a manner, and for our discussion today, we
will assume that the vast majority of the "missing Armenians" in 1917
were killed or died during deportations.

Questions answered

The figures from Talaat Pasha’s Black Book are invaluable because they
answer some fundamental questions about the Armenian Genocide. Two
such questions concern the nature of the actual deportations of 1915,
and the specific fate of those deportees as they were pushed into the
deserts of Der Zor, one of the main areas identified for resettlement.

Talaat Pasha’s information contradicts the official Turkish thesis
that deportations were an orderly affair governed by Ottoman laws and
regulations, or that deportees were actually successfully settled in
Der Zor. Interestingly, Talaat’s Black Book also shows the number of
Armenians in the Ottoman Empire to have been were much higher than
supposed by official figures.

Talaat Pasha’s figures confirm that most Ottoman Armenians outside
Constantinople were indeed deported, and most of these deportees had
disappeared by 1917. On average, 90 percent of provincial Armenians
were deported, and 90 percent of those deported were killed. The
number of people who went missing was over 95 percent for such
provinces as Trabzon, Erzurum, Urfa, Diyarbekir, Mamuret-ul-Aziz, and
Sivas. These figures clearly show that deportations were tantamount to
a death sentence, and they give credence to United States consular
reports that said as much, especially for those deported from the
eastern provinces.

The Der Zor massacres of 1916

The data at hand also tells us about the scale of the Der Zor
massacres of 1916. There is general agreement that hundreds of
thousands of deportees were sent into this desert region in 1915-16,
the main resettlement zone according to Ottoman decrees. Ottoman
sources yield little information on what happened to these
deportees. Survivor accounts and sources outside Turkey (such as those
in United States archives) attest to the fact that deportees in the
Der Zor region mostly wasted away.

By 1917, even those Armenians who had been able to settle in this
area, mainly because of the efforts of the provincial governor Ali
Suad Bey, were taken away and massacred after a new governor, one of
Talaat Pasha’s henchmen, was sent. Deniers of the Armenian Genocide –
who do not have adequate records from Turkish archives – cite United
States records to argue that up to 300,000 people were sent into this
area – omitting the fact that practically none of them survived to
1917. Talaat Pasha’s records show 6,778 Armenians in this province in
1917.

Population totals

The Black Book also gives interesting insights into the number of
Armenians in the Ottoman Empire circa 1914. While these figures are
still smaller than some statistics cited outside Turkey, Talaat
Pasha’s dataset contradict the figures cited by deniers of the
Armenian Genocide, who minimize the number of Ottoman Armenians as
part of their strategy.

The Black Book cites official figures from the 1914 Ottoman population
survey, with a note explaining that this figure, like the figures for
Armenians registered in 1917, should be increased by a factor of 30
percent to account for undercounting.

The note thus increases the main Apostolic (or Gregorian) Armenian
community from 1,187,818 to 1,500,000 people before deportations. The
note also mentions the figure for Catholic Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire as 63,967 (which could also be revised upward to 83,157). There
is no figure given for Protestant Armenians. These figures bring the
number of Ottoman Armenians, based on official figures, close to
1,700,000 people. According to these figures, the total number of
Armenians who were missing in 1917 was around 1,000,000 people. If one
discounts those who might have fled to Russia, the number of missing
Armenians was still in the region of 800,000 to 900,000 people.

Talaat Pasha’s Black Book gives us invaluable insights into the type
of bureaucratic control Ottoman officials wielded over Armenians and
the type of information they gathered as a matter of course. The
existence of such information in Talaat Pasha’s Black Book again
raises the question of what happened to the archival trail that
underpinned his data. The Black Book also provides actual details
about the apparent destruction of Armenians in 1915-16, and it
dismisses the official Turkish assertion that deportations were an
orderly affair in moving and resettling people between 1915 and
1916. Indeed, the image painted by the Black Book validates the more
impressionistic or passing accounts of atrocities against Armenians
reported throughout the Ottoman Empire by foreign observers and
survivors between 1915 and 1916.

###

Ara Sarafian is an archival historian specializing in late Ottoman and
modern Armenian history. He is the director of the Gomidas Institute,
London. This article is a summary of a broader project on "Talaat
Pasha’s Black Book and the Armenian Genocide."

http://www.gomidas.org/

Artsakh Documentary Takes Golden Mike Award

OFFICE OF THE NAGORNO KARABAKH REPUBLIC IN THE USA
1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 223-4330
Fax: (202) 223-4332
E-mail: [email protected]
Web site:

ARTSAKH DOCUMENTARY TAKES GOLDEN MIKE AWARD

Radio and TV News Association of Southern California makes the pick

PRESS RELEASE
March 20, 2009

WASHINGTON, DC – The Radio and Television News Association of Southern
California (see <; ) awarded a
documentary "Nagorno Karabakh, Artsakh: The Struggle for Freedom" with
a prestigious Golden Mike for Best TV Documentary in 2008.

The film was co-written and co-produced by a Los-Angeles-based
journalist Peter Musurlian (Globalist Films) and former NKR Permanent
Representative to the USA, currently NKR Deputy Foreign Minister
Vardan Barseghian.

Narine Aghabalyan, head of the "Tzir Katin" (Milky Way) Studio in
Stepanakert, NKR, and a U.S.-based freelance journalist Vardan Akchyan
provided most of the video material for the documentary.

The film was aired on TV6 in Burbank, California, on September 16,
2008 and also screened the next day at a Capitol Hill event titled
"NKR/Artsakh: 20 Years of Freedom, Democracy, and Progress" and
attended by Members of the U.S. Congress, diplomats, prominent human
rights activists, experts, and community representatives.

Consequently, the documentary was posted on the
<; ArtsakhOnline YouTube channel,
maintained by Artsakh’s diplomatic mission, reaching an audience of
over 11,000 viewers in a few months. The film represents a powerful
combination of interviews, narration and video footage that eloquently
presents Artsakh’s story.

Established by the Association 59 years ago, the Golden Mike Award is
one of the most-coveted by Radio and Television journalists. Among
this year’s award recipients is CNN’s well-known journalist Larry
King.

To view the documentary "Nagorno Karabakh, Artsakh: The Struggle for
Freedom" please visit the ArtsakhOnline:

hOnline

The video of the Award Ceremony can be watched at:

< mp;feature=3Dchannel_page>
http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=3DSxyZ6LpSzvo&feature=3Dchannel_pag e

* * *

The Office of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic in the United States is
based in Washington, DC and works with the U.S. government, academia
and the public representing the official policies and interests of the
Nagorno Karabakh Republic.

This material is distributed by the Office of the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic in the USA on behalf of the Government of the Nagorno
Karabakh Republic. The NKR Office is registered with the
U.S. Government under the Foreign Agent Registration Act. Additional
information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington,
D.C.

http://www.rtna.org/&gt
http://www.youtube.com/ArtsakhOnline&gt
http://www.youtube.com/user/Artsak
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DSxyZ6LpSzvo&a
www.nkrusa.org
www.rtna.org

Campaign Vow To Call Armenians’ Deaths ‘Genocide’ To Be Tested

CAMPAIGN VOW TO CALL ARMENIANS’ DEATHS ‘GENOCIDE’ TO BE TESTED
by Glenn Kessler

Washington Post
March 19 2009

For years, President Obama has not minced words about labeling as
"genocide" the deaths of Armenians more than 90 years ago during the
demise of the Ottoman Empire. Nor have Secretary of State Hillary
Rodham Clinton and Vice President Biden.

All three regularly signed letters to President George W. Bush
demanding that he recognize "the mass slaughter of Armenians
as genocide" and saying that such an act "would constitute a
proud, irrefutable and groundbreaking chapter in U.S. diplomatic
history." During last year’s presidential campaign, Obama repeatedly
insisted that, as president, he would "recognize the Armenian
genocide."

"An official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical
facts is an untenable policy," Obama said in a statement dated
Jan. 19, 2008.

Obama’s pledge may have been smart politics: His campaign rival,
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), infuriated Armenian Americans when he said
it was unfair to blame present-day Turkey for the deaths. But now
that Obama is president, his pledge has put him in a diplomatically
difficult position. The question of calling the deaths a genocide has
returned just as Obama is preparing for a visit next month to Turkey,
which firmly rejects such a label.

"There is no substitute for speaking plainly when you are talking
about mass murder," said Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), who introduced
this week a resolution calling on the president to publicly recognize
a genocide and whose district contains the largest concentration of
Armenian Americans in the country. "I hope he will use the opportunity
to prepare Turkey for U.S. recognition and to encourage Turkey to
have an open examination of its past."

The Armenia resolution is but one example of how a candidate’s narrowly
tailored and effective foreign policy appeals can become problematic
once he is in office.

Clinton, for instance, has come under fire from some conservative
Jewish groups for criticizing Israeli plans to demolish homes in East
Jerusalem — which Palestinians want to make the capital of a future
Palestinian state — during her recent trip to Israel.

"She used to be very strong on a united Jerusalem, and now that’s
out the window," said Morton A. Klein, president of the Zionist
Organization of America, citing a September 2007 position paper from
Clinton’s campaign. "I am beginning to wonder if she just said what
she needed for the Jewish vote."

Administration officials argue that Obama has made huge strides in
fulfilling many of his campaign promises on foreign policy. They
point to his moving to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba; ordering the withdrawal of troops from Iraq; appointing a
special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian peace; and reaching out to Syria,
Russia and other countries on bad terms with the Bush administration.

But officials also acknowledge that Obama’s pledge on Armenian genocide
poses a tricky diplomatic balancing act.

"Our focus is on how, moving forward, the U.S. can help Armenia and
Turkey work together to come to terms with the past," said National
Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer. "It is important that countries
have an open and honest dialogue about the past. At the same time,
we want to work closely with both Turkey and Armenia on the key issues
that confront the region."

Few people deny that massacres killed hundreds of thousands of Armenian
men, women and children during and immediately after World War I. But
Turkish officials and some historians say that the deaths resulted
from forced relocations and widespread fighting when the 600-year-old
Ottoman Empire collapsed, not from a campaign of genocide — and that
hundreds of thousands of Turks also died in the same region during
that time.

U.S.-Turkish relations are on an upswing after a dismal period
immediately after the invasion of Iraq. Turkey, a NATO member, also
plays an increasingly important role in the Middle East, the Caucasus
and the Balkans.

Ahmet Davutoglu, the chief foreign policy adviser to Prime Minister
Recip Tayyip Erdogan, said he stressed that point in meetings this
week with senior administration officials. He also made the case that
Turkish-Armenian relations are improving in the wake of Erdogan’s
recent visit to Armenia, and that any U.S. resolution on genocide
would only set back that progress.

"There is a process, and everyone should strengthen this process and
not try to weaken it," Davutoglu said in an interview. "We hope that
the discussions on the Armenian issue do not affect this process in
a negative sense."

Davutoglu sidestepped a question of what would happen if Obama raised
the Armenian issue before or during his trip to Turkey. "His visit
will be a historic visit in terms of U.S.-Turkish relations," he
said. "We think the success of this visit is essential."

But the administration’s outreach to Turkey must be balanced against
the high hopes that Obama inspired among Armenian Americans. For
decades, they feel they have been disappointed by presidents on the
genocide debate. Only President Ronald Reagan, in 1981, referred to
"the genocide of the Armenians."

Among other things, the proposed House resolution calls on the
president to use his annual message to "accurately characterize the
systematic and deliberate annihilation of 1,500,000 Armenians as
genocide." Obama repeatedly has said he would embrace that language.

"This is the change he promised, and this is the change we expect,"
said Bryan Ardouny, executive director of the Armenian Assembly
of America.

Turkish Premier’s Adviser Hopes The Discussion Of Armenian Genocide

TURKISH PREMIER’S ADVISER HOPES THE DISCUSSION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE WON’T AFFECT NEGATIVELY

PanARMENIAN.Net
21.03.2009 00:57 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The chief foreign policy adviser to Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Ahmet Davutoglu said the process which aimed to
boost relations between Turkey and Armenia should be strengthened. In
an interview with the Washington Post, Turkish premier’s foreign policy
adviser said that Turkish-Armenian relations have been improving and
that any U.S. resolution on the Armenian Genocide would only set back
that progress.

"There is a process, and everyone should strengthen this process
and not try to weaken it," he said. "We hope that the discussions on
the Armenian issue do not affect this process in a negative sense,"
Davutoglu said.

In regard to U.S. President Barack Obama’s upcoming visit to Turkey,
Davutoglu said, "his visit will be a historic visit in terms of
U.S.-Turkish relations. We think the success of this visit is
essential."