Genocide armenien: appel de groupes turcs contre un projet de loi en

Genocide armenien: appel de groupes turcs contre un projet de loi en France

Agence France Presse
5 mai 2006 vendredi 10:53 AM GMT

Des organisations turques ont lance un appel contre un projet de
loi francais visant a permettre des poursuites penales contre les
personnes niant le caractère genocidaire des massacres d’Armeniens
commis en 1915-17, dans une lettre ouverte publiee vendredi dans le
journal Le Parisien.

Cette proposition de loi, qui doit etre presentee aux deputes le 18
mai, vise a “empecher la discussion des evènements tragiques qui se
sont deroules dans l’Empire ottoman en 1915”, affirme cette lettre
signee par neuf organisations syndicales, patronales et economiques
turques.

Elles rappellent la recente polemique en France autour d’un article de
loi affirmant le “rôle positif” de la colonisation – qui a ete ensuite
retire – et affirment que “ce n’est pas a la loi d’ecrire l’histoire”
mais aux historiens.

Mercredi, Ankara a prevenu Paris d’un risque de degradation des
relations bilaterales si le Parlement francais votait cette proposition
de loi.

La Turquie rejette categoriquement la thèse d’un genocide, estimant
qu’il s’agissait d’une repression dans un contexte de guerre civile
où les Armeniens se sont allies aux troupes russes qui avaient envahi
l’empire ottoman.

Ankara evalue a 300.000 le nombre d’Armeniens massacres et affirme
qu’au moins autant de Turcs ont ete tues.

Les Armeniens affirment pour leur part que le nombre de morts durant
des massacres ou des deportations avoisine 1,5 million.

La Turquie a reconnu l’Armenie a son independance en 1991, mais sans
etablir de relations diplomatiques. Elle avait ferme sa frontière avec
l’Armenie en 1993 a la suite de la conquete par des forces armeniennes
de l’enclave du Nagorny Karabakh en Azerbaïdjan.

Il y un an, l’emissaire de l’Union europeenne dans le Caucase du sud
Heiki Talvitie avait estime que l’evolution des liens entre Ankara et
Erevan aurait une “influence” sur l’adhesion de la Turquie a l’Union,
tandis que le chancelier allemand de l’epoque, Gerhard Schroder,
refusait d’en faire un prealable.

–Boundary_(ID_q/OxUCvifI+yYYQ1AI6ACQ) —

Saakashvili: “No single gram of Russia must be left in Georgia”

Saakashvili: “No single gram of Russia must be left in Georgia”

_ (h
ttp://)
13:28 05/04/2006

During his meeting with Kutaisi residents Georgian President Mikhail
Saakashvili addressed with a number of tough statements to Russia
and said that he had instructed the Georgian government to consider
the expediency of Georgia’s further membership in the CIS, reports
a REGNUM correspondent. He said that when flying by Tskhinvali
en route to Kutaisi, he got a “Welcome to the Russian Federation”
message from Megaphone, a Russian mobile operator that operates in
the unrecognized Republic of South Ossetia. Saakashvili called this
“a classical example of annexation.” He also spoke about the ban on
the import of Georgian food in Russia.

“They have put a ban of something we have been selling to Russia for
several decades, something Georgia is homeland to – Georgian wine. Let
alone other products. For example, Kutaisi exported big quantity of
greens to Russia – a business worth several hundreds of millions of
lari – now it has been fully closed, and several hundreds of thousands
of people have been left jobless and with smaller profits,” Sakashvili
said. He noted that the goal of this all is “to make Georgia starve”
and to make people rise against their authorities.

He said that some Russian official clearly said this a few days ago –
“I wonder why after all this the Georgian people is not going into the
streets and is not throwing down its government.” “Their goal is to
change the government that is the last chance for Georgia to restore
its territorial integrity by peace. I want us all to wake up, to sober
up and to realize what danger we are faced with,” Saakashvili said.

“Today we all, irrespective of our political faith, our views, our
origin, are faced with the danger of losing our country, our state,
our independence, our freedom and our future. It is time for all of
us to wake up, to stop petty disputes, intrigues and gossips and to
see what real threats we are facing.

The real threat is that we may lose our country. However, we will not
lose our country because we have already consolidated our state. Last
year we had a 9.5% economic growth – 3.5% more than Russia had – and
in January-March 2006 our preliminary economic growth was 12%-13% —
three times more than in Russia, a country who has oil and gas.” At
the same time, Saakashvili reminded that Russia has raised the fuel
price for Georgia, which has forced people to spend more on electricity
and heating.

“Nevertheless, each of us must understand that we will continue our
development, we will continue attracting investments, strengthening
our democracy, making Georgia a successful country. Our only answer to
those people will be a free, successful, rich country, where people
will be happy and united.” At the same time, Saakashvili noted that
Georgia wants “a very intensive dialogue” with Russia. “We have no
Russo-phobia or any other critical attitude toward s Russia. We want
friendship with Russia – but with Russia that respects our sovereignty,
that will not close the only Georgian church in the center of Moscow
and will not turn out its parish just because they speak Georgian
– with Russia that will not close Georgian Sunday schools in its
territory just because their pupils speak Georgian – with Russia that
will not create problems on the border.”

As an example, Saakashvili told a story about his own family. “A
few days ago my grandmother, who is in a good shape but still
an old woman – went via Russia to an international conference on
allergology and immunology. They at the Moscow airport kept her for
over two hours. They rummaged in her things – she was probably like
a contrabandist — and then they interrogated her for two hours:
what allergology is and what immunology is. Don’t we in Russia
have allergology and immunology? Why are you going abroad? What
kind of professor she was, when she defended her thesis, where she
works, where she lives. In fact, they mocked at her. And this is a
president’s grandmother. But there are very many ordinary grandmothers
and grandfathers, ordinary people who are hurt because of senseless,
unclear, unreasoned, simply harmful policy.”

“I want us to react to this peacefully, calmly, but with dignity. We
want to continue our consultations with Russia, but, at the same time,
I want everybody to know that we must make certain decisions. In late
1991 Georgia became independent – most countries officially recognized
our independence then even though we had proclaimed it much earlier –
and like the Baltic states, Georgia refused to join the CIS. Later, in
1993, during the Abkhazian tragedy, the impoverished and humiliated
Georgia was forced to join the CIS. I think that even though it
was actually a humiliating act, we have got much profit from our
membership in the CIS. We have preserved our ties with the former
Soviet republics, with most of them we have very tight and very
friendly relations.

We have concluded bilateral agreements, we have established trade
networks, we have ensured free movement of people and personal ties. In
the last years this all has got much more active, and I am very glad
to see Azeris, Armenians, Kazakhs, Byelorussians, Ukrainians coming to
Georgia. It is also important that we have had long partnership with
Russia, our products have been in demand in Russia and this demand
has grown lately. This year Russia ordered twice as much Georgian
wine as a year before. But all this has been blocked by Russia. So,
we should sit down and calculate if it is expedient for us to stay
in the CIS any longer.”

“Today, I have instructed the Georgian government to thoroughly
examine and shortly — in several weeks, two months, at latest –
to report to me whether it is economically expedient for Georgia to
stay in the CIS any longer. If we can still get any profit from it,
we will stay. If, as I suspect, this organization can give us nothing
more but humiliation and insult, the Georgian people, together with
its parliament and government, must make a decision worthy of a nation
having dignity and standing firmly on its feet. At the same time,
we must consult on the issue with all our friends and partners,
including the CIS countries, and coordinate our policy with them.”

“We must learn to enter all markets. We will certainly come back to
the Russian market, but as long as the people who are choking us have
an illusion that they are our only way, they will go on squeezing
out our resources to keep us humiliated, infringed and economically
depressed. But as soon as they learn that Georgia has other markets,
that Georgia has actually European and world quality products, we will
have much more ways. We are not going to enter other markets through
the back entrance. We must know that Russia’s import wine market is
just half of what the US has and we perfectly know what sympathies
the US has for Georgia today. We must work. I must thank the Russian
government for its big publicity of our wine – for in the last two
weeks the Georgian wine has got as much publicity as it has not got
throughout its three millennium history. I was in Brussels a few days
ago. I walked in the streets and one man told me: I didn’t know you
have a wine. That ordinary man read about our wine in a newspaper. All
the world’s papers are giving this story, and no one doubts that our
wine was banned not because of pesticides – everybody knows why it
was banned. The Georgian wine is now called a drink of freedom.”

Saakashvili also said that the Georgian government has begun
subsidizing the national wine industry. “We have allocated money
for marketing and publicity in Eastern Europe and America – we
have allocated several millions US dollars for that and we will
allocate tens of millions more if we see that this business works
out.” “Yesterday the government decided — and I approved its decision
– to allocate a state credit and to bring a grape processing plant to
produce not only wine but also grape concentrate to be able to procure
the whole wine stuff already this year. My strict order – and I will
personally control its fulfillment – is that no peasant should lose
heart. We must plant grape instead of cutting it. But let’s learn
to give good production – not only wine. We must not cut our citrus
plants but must learn to process, pack, make juice and other products
of them. The most important thing is that we must learn to work better
and to advertise better. We must learn to do much in many spheres.”

Reverting to the problem of Tbilisi-Moscow relations, Saakashvili
said that he knows “those people.” “Even if we kneel, kiss their feet,
swear to be loyal to them for ever, they still won’t give us a single
gram of humanity. This is their psychology, their complexes – they
want you to be either their slave or their enemy. Georgia will not
be anybody’s slave. Georgia must not be anybody’s enemy, and we will
develop good relations with everybody. The Baltic states, Poland,
Hungary – all of them have passed this way. But our way is twice as
hard to pass – because we must pass it and reach Sukhumi. We must pass
i t in such a way that nobody can send us messages from Tskhinvali
saying ‘ Welcome to Russia.’ We must pass it so as no gram of Russia
be left in the territory of Georgia.”

“This is the task of not only ethnic Georgians, but the common task of
our Armenians, our Azeris, our Ossetians, our Abkhazians, our Kurds,
our Russians, our Ukrainians. If we take only ethnic Georgians, we
are few, if we take everybody who was born in Georgia, we are over
6 millions worldwide – this is already a force. This is already a
big force – those who are in the country and those who are outside
it.” Saakashvili also said that Georgia must be ready for “anything”
and warned that “there will still be provocations.” At the same time,
he noted that the Georgian authorities have “specific documentary
information on who is plotting what provocations.”

www.regnum.ru/english/633435.html_
www.regnum.ru/english/633435.html

BAKU: Council of Europe official,Azeri leader discuss democratizatio

Council of Europe official, Azeri leader discuss democratization, relations

Turan news agency, Baku
6 May

Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Thomas Hammerberg and
President Ilham Aliyev discussed the process of democratization in
Azerbaijan and its relations with the Council of Europe at a meeting
in Baku on 5 May, the Azerbaijani news agency Turan has reported.

After the meeting with the president, Hammerberg met a group of
Azerbaijani rights activists. The meeting discussed the problem of
political prisoners, the refusal of the UN to admit Azerbaijan to
its human rights council, the situation surrounding members of the
pro-opposition Yeni Fikir youth organization charged with cooperation
with the Armenian intelligence service, the absence of an independent
judiciary system in Azerbaijan and the health of the former ministers
arrested on coup charges, rights advocate Novella Cafaroglu told Turan.

Armavia To Take Three Airbuses On Lease

ARMAVIA TO TAKE THREE AIRBUSES ON LEASE

ArmRadio.am
06.05.2006 13:30

In the nearest future Armavia Company intends to lease three airbuses,
Press Service of the Company told “Arminfo.”

According to the source, next week the stock of the Company will
be supplemented with two A320 airplanes manufactured in 1994 or
1995. Later another two airbuses will be taken on lease.

Armavia possessed five airbuses, one of which crashed near Sochi on
May 3; another one was completely burnt as a result of combustion at
” Sabana-Techniques” repair base in Brussels. Currently Armavia holds
one A-320 and two A-319 airbuses. Besides, the company possesses IL-86,
Yak-42 and Yak-40 planes.

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw Conveys His Condolences

BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY JACK STRAW CONVEYS HIS CONDOLENCES

ArmRadio.am
05.05.2006 17:26

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw sent a letter of condolences on
the occasion of the tragic Armavia aircraft accident, “On behalf of the
British government and people, may I express my sincere condolences
at the tragic loss of life resulting from the Armavia plane crash
that occurred in the early hours of 3 May.

My sympathies and thoughts are with you and with the families and
friends of all those who died in the crash.”

AAA Extends Condolences To Families And Friends Of Victims Of Armavi

AAA EXTENDS CONDOLENCES TO FAMILIES AND FRIENDS OF VICTIMS OF ARMAVIA PLANE CRASH

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
May 03 2006

WASHINGTON, MAY 3, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. Hirair Hovnanian,
Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Armenian Assembly of
America (AAA), on behalf of the AAA’s leadership, members and staff,
extends his heartfelt condolences to all the families and friends of
the victims of the Armavia plane crash in Sochi. “This tragedy, in
which our fellow compatriots perished, is a great loss for the entire
Armenian nation. You are in our thoughts and prayers,” Hirair Hovnanian
writes in his letter of condolences, submitted to “Noyan Tapan”
by Arpi Vartanian, AAA’s Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh Country Director.

Will Tragedy Always Be Our Teacher?

WILL TRAGEDY ALWAYS BE OUR TEACHER?
By Hakob Avetikian

AZG Armenian Daily
05/05/2006

The morning hours of May 3 plunged our country into alarming grief. The
news of the tragedy has already spread when starting from 10.00 am
all local TV channels suddenly began airing details of the crash as
though receiving an order from a common headquarters.

Though today we have modern European jets and safety equipments and
services at the airport, the slovenliness that becomes a distinctive
feature of Armenian identity and is incompatible with air navigation
and our dislike for order were a serious concern for aviation
employees.

Planes of the best international air carriers also crash due to weather
conditions, flight controllers’ mistakes, technical failure or the
crew’s mistake. No air carrier is safeguarded against this. Neither
is Armavia.

Yet, air navigation is a sphere where all kinds of defects should be
excluded. Otherwise we will such tragedies.

Another bad trait in our identity – careless attitude towards the
others’ pain – came out again on May 3 when starting from the noon
TV channels aired the names of the perished passengers. The names
were also hung at the airport. No middle names were put in. No one,
fortunately, can guarantee that all passengers are dead. No one could
be 100 percent sure that Armavia roll was correct. Who can measure
the sorrow that numerous citizens went through while approaching the
rolls and reading the names of relatives or friends?

Once again we had to learn from our tragedies.

Benedict XVI Prays For Airliner Victims

BENEDICT XVI PRAYS FOR AIRLINER VICTIMS

Zenit News Agency, Italy
May 4 2006

VATICAN CITY, MAY 3, 2006 (Zenit.org).- Benedict XVI expressed his
sympathy on receiving the news of an airliner that smashed into the
Black Sea killing 113.

The crash occurred early today in Russian territory and involved a
plane from Armenian Airlines.

In a telegram sent in his name by Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal
Angelo Sodano, the Pope invoked “the mercy of the Lord, praying that
he will receive” the victims “in his Kingdom of Peace.”

The Holy Father assured his prayers for the families of the deceased,
“the authorities and all the Armenian people.”

Will Post-Soviet Territory Air Defense Be United?

WILL POST-SOVIET TERRITORY AIR DEFENSE BE UNITED?

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

Russia is ready to establish a privileged regime for its partners
in Air Defense United System, including supplying them with modern
anti-aircraft complexes S-300

NUCLEAR SUBMARINES; The program of development of the naval strategic
nuclear force until 2010 is aimed at retaining combat readiness of
the naval strategic component and the creation of the first submarine
of generation four (project 955 Borei) with the Bulava solid-fuel
ballistic missile with MIRVs.

CIS air boundaries united defense takes a leading position in united
collective measures, taken by post-soviet countries in the military
sphere. Notwithstanding disintegration processes that are taking place
in Commonwealth countries, Air Defense United System established over
10 years ago is still working, which was revealed at the recent staff
command training of CIS Air Defense United System.

Russian Air Forces second Commander-in-chief Lieutenant-General
Aytech Bizhev stated, that aircraft alert forces of CIS Air Defense
United System have successfully fulfilled all the missions. “Over ten
missions, connected with strengthening air boundaries of CIS countries,
have been worked on”, said Bizhev. According to his words, Air Forces
Commander-in-chief Army General Vladimir Mikhailov, who was heading
the training, expressed his satisfaction with CIS countries national
army units and subdivisions, which participated in the training.

It is vital to note that forces and subdivisions of only eight CIS
countries took part in staff command training: those of Armenia,
Byelorussia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
and Ukraine. However, according to the agreement of February 10,
2005 Air Defense United System includes 10 countries, Georgia and
Turkmenistan besides the named eight countries. As is known, Georgia
officially left the CIS military structure last year, and Turkmenistan,
having announced its neutrality, does not participate in CIS collective
military organs activities. The role of these two countries in united
defense of CIS air border is reduced to zero, but they have influence
on CIS countries security. In fact, CIS South is not safe. Last year
Georgia prohibited Russian reconnaissance airplane A-50 to fly to the
territory of Armenia during staff command trainings of Air Defense
United System. This year pilots didn’t try to do it. Thus, it is
possible to talk only about partial air boundaries defense of Air
Defense United System. In fact, only the countries which are included
in Collective Security Treaty Organization actively participate in
CIS Air Defense United System (that is Armenia, Byelorussia, Russian
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan). Ukraine and Uzbekistan take
part in staff command training on the bilateral basis. At the same
time Kyiv can cease participating in Air Defense United System if
the Ukraine will be allowed to NATO.

Moscow is trying to establish a privileged regime for Air Defense
United System countries to keep Russia’s neighbors in the limits of
the united system. For example, supplying anti-aircraft complexes with
spare parts, their maintenance and service is fulfilled by Russian
factories on the privileged basis. For these purposes there is finance
in the Russian budget. The other day Russian Air Forces General staff
Commander Boris Cheltsov stated, that anti-aircraft missiles S-300
produced by the concern “Almaz-Antey” would be in the armament of all
countries of CIS Air Defense United System. Of course, such statements
should be done by politicians, not by military men. However, is it has
been said by the representative of Air Forces Commander-in-chief, by an
authoritative military commander, it is possible to suggest that there
had already been the corresponding political decision made. Let us
remind that anti-aircraft complexes S-300 are exported to Byelorussian
without charge. From July 1 the complexes will be airborne alert. This
is a very important geopolitical step. According to the words of
Russian Air Forces second Commander-in-chief Lieutenant-General Aytech
Bizhev this fact that the complexes will be airborne alert will allow
to replace the farthest limit of the air objects hitting area to 150
kilometers to the West. The contact area will be 400 kilometers larger,
accordingly. It is a vital strategic-tactical step for the Russian
Federation. S-300 is capable of hitting a target at the height of
20-45 kilometers, applying fire to 6 targets at the same time. To
compare with, American “Patriot” can blaze away only 4 air targets.

If analogous complexes will be supplied to other countries of Air
Defense United System, Russia and its allies will be able to control
to certain degree boundaries of China, Turkey, Afghanistan, Iran,
Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania and of Baltic countries. It would
be an important step in providing security for the Russian Federation
and its allies. However, it is not yet clear how NATO countries will
react. Any action can cause a counter-action. It is quite possible
that the West will make up neutralization measures for CIS integrated
military structures, like Air Defense United System.

The Russian naval strategic force (…) presents units of nuclear
submarines armed with ballistic missiles at the Northern and Pacific
fleets. The units are subordinated to the General Staff. The Navy
controls their construction, combat-training and the deployment in
patrol areas.

(…) The experience gained during the creation of first nuclear
submarines and diesel submarines (projects V611 and 629) let the
USSR start creating the K-19 nuclear submarine (project 658) with
ballistic missiles in the mid-1950s. The submarine was added to
arsenals on November 22, 1960 (underwater displacement is 5,000
tons). The characteristics of the submarine: two nuclear reactors
(30,000 h.p.); underwater speed – 30 knots; depth – 300 meters,
durability – 50 days; crew – 100 people; weapons – three R-13 missiles
(D-2 complex) with the range of fire of 650 kilometers.

These submarines had to rise to the surface in order to launch
missiles. In all, eight such submarines were built.

The submarines were armed with the R-21 missiles (D-4 complex) in
1963. They could be launched from the underwater position (project
658M). The range of fire increased to 1,400 km. (…)

The Navy received project 667A submarines with 16 ballistic missiles
in 1967. They became the forefathers of a range of submarines known
in the West as Delta-I, Delta-II, Delta-III, Delta-IV (projects 667B,
667BD, 667BDR, 6677BDRM).

They carried long-range ballistic missiles. The type of warheads and
their power changed. These submarines were called strategic missile
submarines.

Project 667A submarines were produced until 1972. In all, 34
submarines were created (underwater displacement – 9,500 tons; two
nuclear reactors – 50,000 h.p.; underwater speed – 30 knots; depth –
320 meters; R-27 missiles (RSM-25 complex) with the range of fire
of 3,000 km; launch depth – 50 meters). Modernization of the project
was aimed at increasing the range of fire to 3,900 km. (…)

The USSSR built 18 project 667B submarines (underwater displacement
– 10,000 tons; two nuclear reactors (24,000 h.p. each); underwater
speed – 25 knots; depth – 320 meters; crew – 120 people; durability –
70 days; 12 R-29 missiles – 8,000 km; precision – 1.5 km) in 1972-1977.

In addition, the USSR design project 667BD submarines (underwater
displacement – 11,400 tons; nuclear reactors, underwater speed and
durability are the same; depth – 3900 meters; maximum depth – 450
meters). The strong hull was by 15 meters longer. This is why the
submarine carried 16 R-29 ballistic missiles (three MIRVs on each).

The range of fire increased to 9,000 km; precision – 900 meters.

Launch depth – 55 meters. Four such submarines were built until 1975.

(…)

Project 667BDR submarines were added to arsenals in 1976 (underwater
displacement – 10,600 tons; two nuclear reactors (60,000 h.p.);
underwater speed – 24 knots; crew – 130 people; durability – 90
days)/ In all, 14 such submarines were built until 1985. The main
peculiarity of its RSM-50 missile complex was that the missiles could
carry three different types of warheads: R-29R with three MIRVs –
6,500 km; R-29K – seven MIRVs; R-29RL – one powerful warhead, 9,000
km. The submarines carried 16 missiles. Their precision was around
900 meters. The majority of submarines were repaired and modernized
before 1991 when the collapse of the Russian defense industry began.

This is why they managed to operate in the 1990s. However, Russia
had to scrap part of submarines due to the START agreements. However,
it’s possible that some project 667BDR submarines will operate until
the creation of new generation submarines.

In response to the Trident program (Ohio submarines), the USSR
launched the Typhoon project in 1981, aiming to create project
941 submarines (…) (underwater displacement – 25,000 tons). The
submarine consisted of two strong hulls linked one light hull. The
new architecture increased the survivability of the submarine and
the reliability of weapons. The submarine had two reactors 80,000 h.p.

each. Its underwater speed was 27 knots. The depth is 500 meters. The
RSM-52 complex consists of 20 three-stage missiles (R-39) with ten
MIRVs each. The range of fire exceeds 10,000 km. The launch depth is
55 meters. The typhoon is equipped with anti-aircraft complexes. The
crew is 179 people; durability – 120 days. (…)

Project 667BDRM followed the Typhoon (seven submarines built since
1981). At present, these submarines are the foundation of the naval
strategic nuclear force. Russia will use them until 2010-15. These
submarines are superior to generation two nuclear submarines. Their
characteristics are similar with that of the Ohio submarines.

Displacement is 10,800 tons (underwater displacement – 13,000 tons);
two nuclear reactors (60,000 h.p. each); underwater speed – 24 knots;
depth – 650 meters; crew – 120 people. The RSM-54 missile complex is
armed with 16 R-29RM missiles (9,300 km). Every missile carries four
MIRVs. The missiles can destroy small targets thanks to their high
precision (missile silos, command posts and more). The submarine can
launch all missiles from the depth of 55 meters. The RSM-54 complex
is superior to the Trident-2 complex. It’s not ruled out that the
R-29MR missiles will carry ten MIRVs (due to the US’ withdrawal from
ABM). The missiles can be armed with ordinary charges and small nuclear
charges, which can destroy small targets without damaging neighboring
settlements. This means that such submarines can be used in different
military conflicts. (…)

At present, the Russian Navy has seven project 667BDRM submarines,
five project 9941 submarines and two project 667BDR submarines. Two
Typhoon submarines are in good technical condition. One of them is
involved in tests of the Bulava missile complex.

In other words, Russia has 11 strategic nuclear submarines, which carry
184 ballistic missiles with 944 warheads. Weakening of the strategic
submarine group makes the Russian military worry, especially after
the US’ withdrawal from ABM and the factual liquidation of START-I
and START-II. The US currently has 18 nuclear submarines with 432
ballistic missiles and 3,120 MIRVs.

The new agreement on strategic nuclear weapons was signed on May 24,
2002 (it came into force on June 1, 2003). According to the agreement,
Russia and the US must cut the number of strategic nuclear warheads
to 1,700-2,000 kilotons until December 31, 2012. (…)

The Russian president signed the decree to increase the naval component
of the strategic nuclear force to 55% until 2005 in 1998.

The program of development of the naval strategic nuclear force
until 2010 (…) is aimed at retaining combat readiness of the
naval strategic component and the creation of the first submarine
of generation four (project 955 Borei) with the Bulava solid-fuel
ballistic missile with MIRVs.

The submarine was laid up on November 2, 19996. The displacement
of the submarine will amount to 24,000 tons. Depth – 450 meters;
underwater speed – 30 knots. This will be the most noiseless
submarine in the world. It will combine the most up-to-date technical
solutions. The missile complex will be able to overcome anti-missile
defense. The submarine will be equipped with a rescue chamber for
1000 servicemen. (…)

The second phase of the program (2006-10) is aimed at serial production
of the new submarines, which must retain the nuclear potential of
the naval strategic nuclear force after scrapping of generation three
submarines. (…)

Union For The Sake Of Armenia Party Offices Open In Vanadzor

UNION FOR THE SAKE OF ARMENIA PARTY OFFICES OPEN IN VANADZOR

Noyan Tapan
May 02 2006

VANADZOR, MAY 2, NOYAN TAPAN. On April 29, offices of the Union for the
Sake of Armenia party opened in Vanadzor. Members of the organizing
body – RA MPs Vahram Baghdasarian, Levon Khachatrian, painter Hrant
Tadevosian, representatives of the party’s youth wing were present
at the opening of the offices. According to Vahram Baghdasarian,
the initiators of party’s foundation were the members of NA National
Deputy MP group who have never belonged to any political force by now
and have now united around a single political idea. As Baghdasarian
affirmed, there is a need of a new word in the political field of
Armenia connected with the rearrangements expected in this field,
which Vahran Baghdasarian and his co-thinkers connect with the coming
parliamentary elections. This is one of the main reasons for founding
the party. A representative meeting of the party took place after the
ceremonies of opening the offices. Numerous supporters and co-thinkers
of the party took part in the meeting.

The same day party’s offices opened in another regions of the country
as well.