EU-Turkey Negotiations Partly Suspended

EU-TURKEY NEGOTIATIONS PARTLY SUSPENDED
Petros Keshishian

AZG Armenian Daily
14/12/2006

On the eve of the EU summit December 14-15, the Foreign Ministers of
the EU member adhering to the resolutions of the European Commission,
made decision that the EU-Turkey negotiations should be partly
suspended and 8 of the 35 points of the talks be left out of the
agenda. The question of adopting the Ankara Protocol (which implies
the recognition of Cyprus) and the question of opening Turkey’s sea
and air space for Cyprian transport are among those 8 points.

The Federation of European Armenians informs that the 25 EU states
demand the European Commission to present annual reports about the
fulfillment of Turkey’s commitments through 2009. President of the
Federation Hilda Choboyan said that such decision increases the
uncertainty in the EU-Turkey relations. To Ms.

Choboyan’s opinion definite terms of adopting the Ankara Protocol
should be established.

The Federation stresses that the human rights violations in Turkey
can seriously harm the Pan-European progress. The organization points
out such severe violations as the denial of the Armenian Genocide,
oppression of Kurds and other religious and ethnic minorities and
restrictions of the freedom of speech. Turkey also refuses to stop
the economical and political blockade of Armenia, thus violating the
European Neighborhood principles.

Documentary Featuring SYSTEM OF A DOWN Opens Today – Dec. 8, 2006

DOCUMENTARY FEATURING SYSTEM OF A DOWN OPENS TODAY – DEC. 8, 2006

Blabbermouth.net, NY
Dec 8 2006

Launch Radio Networks reports: "Screamers", a new documentary about
the history of genocide throughout the 20th century featuring SYSTEM OF
A DOWN, premieres in Los Angeles today (Friday, December 8), with the
film expanding to other cities in January. The members of SYSTEM OF A
DOWN are all descended from survivors of the Armenian genocide, during
which the Turkish government slaughtered 1.5 million Armenians. SYSTEM
frontman Serj Tankian told Launch that the film features an interview
with his grandfather, who is one of the few remaining eyewitnesses to
the genocide. "My grandfather is a survivor," he said. "He’s 96 years
old and it’s a genocide that occurred 90-some years ago, so there’s
very few survivors. He lost his brother, his father, his uncles, he
was left in different orphanages, he’s lost his sight from malnutrition
and, you know, the fact that he survived is an absolute miracle."

"Screamers" was directed by filmmaker Carla Garapedian, who is also
an Armenian-American.

The film examines the causes of genocide, from the 1915 Armenian
extermination to the Holocaust to recent atrocities in Rwanda and
Darfur.

Tankian and drummer John Dolmayan met with members of Congress last
April to lobby for legislation recognizing the Armenian genocide. The
bill has been repeatedly blocked by Congressional leaders.

SYSTEM OF A DOWN is currently on an extended hiatus as the members
work on various solo projects.

BAKU: Mehriban Aliyeva On Working Visit To US

MEHRIBAN ALIYEVA ON WORKING VISIT TO US

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Dec 6 2006

First lady of Azerbaijan, chairperson of the working group on
Azerbaijan-US inter-parliamentary relations, UNESCO goodwill ambassador
Mehriban Aliyeva is on working visit to the US, APA reports quoting
to Azertac.

Within her visit Mehriban Aliyeva met with co-chairs of the working
group on Azerbaijan, congressman democrat Solomon Ortiz, republican
Bill Shuster and members of the working group Edd Winfield, Vicente
Fox.

Mehriban Aliyeva stressed the successful development of relations
between Azerbaijan and the US. Discussions on the settlement of Nagorno
Karabakh conflict, lift of Section 907 to the Freedom Support Act,
geostrategical position of Azerbaijan were held at the meeting.

Later Mehriban Aliyeva met with Robert Wexler, congressman who is about
to take up his duties of Executive Director of Subcommittee on Europe
and Emerging Threats and invited him to Azerbaijan. The first lady was
accompanied by a group of Azerbaijani parliamentarians. The president
of Heydar Aliyev Foundation also met with George Bush Presidential
Library Foundation President, ex-councillor on US National Security
issues Brent Scowcroft. First lady also met with the representatives
of famous universities of Washington. Famous U.S.

scientists and statesmen, as well as Susan Eisenhower, Frederick
Star, Svante Cornell, Anjela Stand, James Baker, Rob Sobhani, Roald
Sagdeev, Ariel Cohen participated in the meeting. Mehriban Aliyeva
also visited Walter Reed Army Medical Center and Weaving Museum in
Washington. In the Azerbaijan Trade and Cultural Center (ATCC) founded
by US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce of Washington first lady met with
American art figures and Azerbaijani art figures living and working
in the US. Mehriban Aliyeva’s working visit to the US continues.

Fearing A New Holy Empire

FEARING A NEW HOLY EMPIRE
By Adnan R. Khan

Maclean’s, Canada
December 4, 2006

Just when Turks are worried about Christians, here comes the Pope

When Pope Benedict XVI arrives in Ankara on Nov. 28, few people expect
he’ll be given a warm welcome. In the aftermath of comments the pontiff
made on Sept. 12, quoting a Byzantine emperor who characterized some
of the Prophet Muhammad’s teachings as "evil and inhuman," suspicions
over the planned visit to Turkey have intensified. Why now, many Turks
are asking, at a time when Turkey’s relations with Europe are tense,
and some observers are even forecasting the suspension of part of
Turkey’s EU membership negotiations when EU leaders meet next month.

In Europe, opposition to Turkey ever joining the EU is increasing.

Benedict, when he was still a cardinal, was part of that club: in
2004, just months before being elected pope, he stated that Turkey
"is founded upon Islam" and "thus the entry of Turkey into the EU
would be anti-historical." That assessment is still fresh in the minds
of Turks, as is the steady stream of reform demands from EU member
nations, not to mention France’s General Assembly recently passing
a provocative bill outlawing the denial of the Armenian genocide at
the hands of Ottoman Turks during the First World War.

That bill, more a message to Turkey’s government than a legitimate
addition to France’s legal code, is unlikely to be passed by the
French Senate, but it is still a bitter pill to swallow for Turks,
who have been busy trying to meet EU requirements before the leaders’
meeting in December. In fact, in protest against the legislation,
Turkey cut military ties to France.

But even as Turks grow increasingly embittered with the message from
Europe that they are not welcome, many are also concerned about the
pressures their society is facing from westernization. "The flow
of cultural values has been moving west to east for decades," says
Berdal Aral, a professor in the international relations department
of Fatih University, Istanbul’s most conservative post-secondary
institution. For many conservative Turks, the Pope’s visit falls into
a disturbing pattern of Christianization sweeping their nation. "They
want to transform us into a Christian country," says Muhiddin
Sanarslan, a 30-year-old Muslim living in the conservative Fatih
district of Istanbul. "That’s the only way they will accept us. Well,
forget it then. That will not happen."

But it is happening, if not literally then certainly in terms of
culture and iconography. In Istanbul, traditionally an intersection
of East and West, the West has, for some time now, had the green
light. From Sunday holidays to Santa Claus, symbols of Christian
tradition are gaining ground. More tangibly, figures published in
January 2004 in Turkey’s mainstream Milliyet newspaper claimed that
35,000 Muslims, the vast majority of them in Istanbul, had converted
to Christianity in 2003. While impossible to confirm (the Turkish
government does not release these figures), the rate of conversion,
according to Christian leaders in Turkey, is on the rise.

"Conversion is a very sensitive topic," says Behnan Konutgan, project
coordinator for Bible translation at the Bible Society in Turkey.

"The Milliyet figure sounds too high to me, but this is something no
one in the Christian community wants to talk about." As an evangelical,
Konutgan admits that speaking about his beliefs is part of his mission,
though he shies away from calling it proselytization.

Konutgan and his Bible Society have no illusions about the dangers of
working in a country where 99.8 per cent of the population is Muslim
and a growing number of those Muslims are hostile to his activities
(in a recent case, a 16-year-old boy from the conservative eastern
Anatolian city of Trabzon received 19 years in prison for the
murder of a Catholic priest, Andrea Santoro, in the midst of the
Danish cartoon crisis). His office, located near the Grand Bazaar in
Istanbul’s historic Sultanahmet district, employs security precautions
comparable to those of any diplomatic mission. The locked gate leads
to a guardhouse where visitors must produce some form of identity and
confirm they are expected before being handed a visitor’s card. Inside
the complex, finding the society and the attached "prayer house"
is an intuitive venture–both are located behind an unmarked door.

"You have to be a brave person to be Christian in this society," says
Konutgan. "A Christian convert will likely lose his job, his friends,
his family. He will no longer be considered a Turk." To ease the
pressures on Christians, the outspoken pastor says his community is
"desperate" for Turkey to join the EU. Some key reforms to Turkey’s
existing laws would benefit minority groups like his, including a
recent, controversial amendment to property laws, demanded by the
EU, that would allow religious foundations to own property. That,
says Konutgan, could allow Christian groups to reclaim property
appropriated by the Turkish republic. "We’ve gone to the European
court to get our properties back," he adds. "We won the case and
Turkey changed some laws, but we’re still waiting for our land."

But the Christian community’s opponents argue that giving Christians
property rights would lead to a Christian "reoccupation" of Turkey.

"They will end up owning half our land," says 64-year-old Ali Shahin,
a retired religious studies teacher who opposes any concessions to
Christians for the sake of EU membership. "The Vatican will then send
money here to build churches. It is a new form of colonization. This
Pope is a dangerous man: he wants to create a new Christian empire."

Pope Benedict’s visit, officially described as an attempt to heal the
952-year-old schism between the Catholic and Orthodox churches, is
being interpreted by Istanbul’s conservative Muslims as an extension of
the Vatican’s push to confront Islam. "Istanbul," says Father Felice
at the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit, "is one of the most holy cities
in Christiandom. If Rome is one lung of the Christians, then Istanbul
is the other, and Pope Benedict is attempting to reunite the two." For
Orthodox Christians, a powerful denomination with deep-rooted influence
over much of Eastern Europe and Greece, Istanbul, or Constantinople
as many of them still call it, is their Rome. It is also the link
to the West for the few remaining Christians in other parts of the
Middle East, the majority of whom are Orthodox.

The underlying implications of Pope Benedict’s visit don’t sit well
with even moderate Muslims. "This Pope is extremely dangerous for
Islam," says professor Aral, echoing Ali Shahin’s sentiments. "He is
trying to form a united front against Islam. This is the perception
of many Muslims in Turkey." But, unlike the more radical Shahin,
the problem for moderates like him, he says, is not theological
or even confrontational. It is a question of identity. "Anatolian
Islam has always been moderate. But in recent years we’re seeing a
crystallization of religious and secular identities in Turkey." The
result is a rise in radicalism, with a parallel rise in secularism.

Both forces feed off each other in a dynamic city like Istanbul. As
more and more Turks express their "Europeanness," openly ignoring
traditional religious responsibilities like fasting during Ramadan,
which they see as vestiges of a retrogressive past, more Islamists
turn to a more radical version of their faith, concerned with the
corruption of their society and reacting to it with more fervour.

Members of this latter group, says Konutgan, now feel they can have
a purely Islamic identity that has nothing to do with the West.

The Pope’s visit and the reform of Turkish society over the course of
the EU accession bid could potentially widen the rift between these two
groups. But this is a natural process, argues Ayhan Kaya, director of
the Centre for European Studies at Istanbul Bilgi University. "We’re
still at the early stages of Turkey’s encounter with Europe. The
problem right now is that certain groups with vested interests are
taking advantage of certain perceptions in Turkish society." As
Turkey enters another electoral cycle, with a presidential election
slated for May 2007 and parliamentary elections six months later,
the typical partisan campaign process has begun.

"Political parties and reactionary groups are using the hot issues,"
he adds, "like property rights for Christians and conversions, to
promote their own interests." Kaya is optimistic that this phase will
end once the elections are over.

Others are not. "The only thing that will change the attitude of
Turkey’s Muslims toward its Christians," says Konutgan, "is if we
take all of the school textbooks that teach Muslim kids to hate
Christians and burn them." The same, radical Muslims would argue,
could be said about the current Pope, who has been regularly accused
of sowing hatred between the religions. Books and popes aside though,
the future of interfaith relations in Turkey seems set for more
controversy than reconciliation.

Industrial Production Declines By 0.9% In Armenia In January-October

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION DECLINES BY 0.9% IN ARMENIA IN JANUARY-OCTOBER 2006 ON SAME PERIOD OF LAST YEAR

Noyan Tapan
Dec 06 2006

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 6, NOYAN TAPAN. In January-October 2006, industrial
production of 523 bln 619.6 mln drams (about 1 bln 231 mln USD)
was manufactured in Armenia. Industrial production of 537 bln 88.1
mln drams was sold, including production of 45 bln 588.9 mln drams
– in CIS countries, that of 143 bln 689.4 mln drams – in other
countries. According to the RA National Statistical Service, the
physical volume of industrial production declined by 0.9% in the
first ten months of 2006 on the same period of last year, while
the industrial production without production and distribution of
electricity, gas and water – by 0.4%. With respect to 78 out of the
124 main goods produced in January-October 2006, the level of the
same period of 2005 was either achieved or exceeded, including 46
out of the 71 goods of production and technical significance and 32
out of the 53 consumer goods.

Minister Oskanian’s Statement at the OSCE Ministerial Council in Bru

PRESS RELEASE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
Contact: Information Desk
Tel: (374-10) 52-35-31
Email: [email protected]
Web:

STATEMENT BY
FOREIGN MINISTER VARTAN OSKANIAN
AT THE 14TH OSCE MINISTERIAL
December 4, Brussels

Mr. Chairman,

The agenda before this 14th Meeting of the Ministerial Council of the OSCE
has far-reaching implications. In some cases, it extends and deepens our
past commitments. In others, it expands the scope of our overall
pre-occupations with security, and its complex, multidimensional
components.

The decisions we are about to adopt on the exploitation of children, hate
crimes, human trafficking, trafficking in small arms and illegal weapons
are extensions of existing domains. The important decisions on organized
crime, transportation and energy security are clearly additional
directions, claiming distinct attention.

It has been an arduous process addressing the issues that the Ljubljana
Ministerial tasked us with. Regrettably, the search for a middle ground
has inevitably led to the weakening of some modest but substantive
proposals, inspired by the Eminent Persons~R approach. Mr. Chairman, the
Belgian Chairmanship under your guidance, succeeded to keep up the
momentum, look for solutions, cajole, pressure and produce this package of
decisions to enhance the effectiveness of our organization.

Allow me to point to what I wish were also included. I wish, for example,
that the role of host countries, their prerogatives and interests were
more fully reflected in the decision regarding the enhancement of the
effectiveness of the OSCE~Rs Secretariat, the institutions and the field
missions. After all, the ultimate benefit of the field office in Yerevan,
and elsewhere, is in their efforts to make themselves redundant.

Additionally, regarding the utility of ODIHR~Rs work. As effective as
ODIHR~Rs priorities and practices are, it would be misleading to conclude
that it can no longer adapt, be improved or become more responsive and
transparent. Its operational autonomy should not insulate it entirely from
the judgment and appreciation of participating states.

This ~Qreform~R process has been trying to find its way toward a
satisfactory conclusion for more than 5 years. Today, the participating
states face a crucial dilemma — terminate the process because it is
incomplete, or continue work on at least some elements, hoping the next
round will be more fruitful. Armenia is clearly inclined towards this
second choice. Otherwise, we will expose our inability to achieve
convergence about the means of getting our own house in order before we
keep expanding our agenda to cope with the world~Rs ills.

Mr. Chairman, in Armenia, we understand the importance of getting one~Rs
own house in order, in order to successfully navigate the myriad regional
and global challenges. Thus, we have focused on strengthening our economy
and consolidating our democratic reforms. We continue to register double
digit growth, we remain highest in the region on the UN~Rs Human
Development Index. To empower the residents of rural Armenia and enable
the sustainability and viability of Armenia~Rs villages, we have embarked,
together with the Diaspora and with public and private partners, on a
rural poverty eradication program, because this segment of our population
has benefited only modestly from Armenia~Rs overall economic growth.

In addition, we have taken on additional political reform commitments,
especially in the run-up to two important election years. I believe we
must also take special steps to engage our public in setting the agenda
for these elections, and through them for the next decade of stabilization
and prosperity. A public that believes in its role in the development of
our society will be a public that is ready to take ownership of the
election process and its outcomes. We will invite ODIHR to observe the
process and we hope to meet the standards and expectations of a watching
world.

Mr. Chairman,

We know that the world is watching our region for other reasons as well.
No one wants a lasting settlement to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict more
than we do. The last meeting between the presidents of Armenia and
Azerbaijan gives us hope that agreement may yet be found even on those
principles around which we still don~Rt see eye to eye. We know that a
lasting solution will depend on the security and status of the people of
Nagorno Karabakh. That is how this conflict began ~V when their security
was violated, and their right to self-determination trampled over. The
principles under discussion seek to satisfy the right of the people of
Nagorno Karabakh to self-determination while at the same time eliminating
the consequences of the conflict. We anticipate that indeed Azerbaijan
will find the will to acknowledge and respect the right of the people of
Nagorno Karabakh to determine its own future, its own status, its own
security arrangements.

In just a few days, Nagorno Karabakh will hold a referendum to
adopt a Constitution. During this decade and a half, they have built
political institutions, through elections they have selected their own
authorities and developed a legislative framework. They recognized the
need for a basic law, and recognized that a referendum is the only
acceptable way to collectively adopt that basic law. For the international
community to dismiss their democratic aspirations and blame them for
choosing to behave democratically is counterproductive. Azerbaijan claims
that exercising a vote is an obstruction to the peace process. It can~Rt be
further from the truth. What really obstructs the process is their
overreaction to Karabakh~Rs democratic activities, their refusal to engage
Nagorno Karabakh in peace talks, their repeated militaristic calls and
their persistent efforts to sidetrack the Minsk Group negotiations
process.

Finally Mr. Chairman, we wish the Spanish Chairmanship well.

http://www.ArmeniaForeignMinistry.am

Serge Sargsyan Is The President Isagulyan Dreams Of

SERGE SARGSYAN IS THE PRESIDENT ISAGULYAN DREAMS OF

A1+
[06:33 pm] 04 December, 2006

"We tried to create a document which proceeds from the reality and
answers all the questions the RA faces today", stated Garnik Isagulyan,
the advisor of the RA President on security issues. The discussion
about the RA National Security draft strategy took place in club
"Urbat".

Seizing the opportunity, the President’s advisor thanked RA Defense
Minister Serge Sargsyan. "The Defense Minister who is also the head
of the committee processing the draft said from the very beginning
that the work on the draft will be open, and everyone must have
their contribution to its development", mentioned Mr. Isagulyan. He
also informed that the draft Strategy will not be widely discussed;
it will just be sent to corresponding bodies.

Studying about 30-40 international security doctrines, Mr. Isagulyan
realized, "In this changeable world, if the document is adopted as
a law, we will have serious problems. I’d prefer the Government to
adopt the document which will be sent to be ratified by the President".

Mr. Isagulyan did not deny the fact that the security doctrines of the
country are written for a certain historical period. "The document
must include the processes that take place in the world and in the
region and how the RA must act in the context of those processes". In
this connection the security strategy will change alongside with the
situation in the world.

Speaking about the Presidential elections, Mr. Isagulyan claimed
that his favorite candidate is Serge Sargsyan, especially thanks to
his activity in different fields including chess, army, security,
education, etc. He informed that he will spare no effort to support
Serge Sargsyan in the coming elections.

Disagreements Remain Btwn Sides To Karabakh Settlement Talks-Corr

DISAGREEMENTS REMAIN BTWN SIDES TO KARABAKH SETTLEMENT TALKS-CORR
Tigran Liloyan

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
December 1, 2006 Friday

Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said on Friday that
disagreements are remaining in the negotiating process on the Nagorno
Karabakh settlement. These disagreements concern the principles of
a peace agreement, as well as its nuances, the minister told a news
conference, adding that "a window of opportunities" for the conflict
settlement will probably remain open in the next year.

According to the minister, the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan
will give concrete instructions to the foreign ministers shortly for
the continued negotiating process. "The process is not in impasse,"
Oskanian believes.

The Azerbaijani authorities keep calling the observance of Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity as a basis for settlement, and Armenia – the
right of the Karabakh people for self-determination.

According to the Armenian minister, "A solution to this problem
can be found only at a referendum, the proposal to hold which is
included in the document the sides are discussing." For Oskanian
"it is obvious that a referendum will be held in Nagorno Karabakh,
and people, who lived and live there, will participate in it."

The Armenian foreign minister believes that without participation
of Nagorno Karabakh’s representatives in the negotiating process,
even though at its final stage, "settlement will be impossible".

Official: Armenia and Azerbaijan discussing terms of NK referendum

International Herald Tribune, France
Dec 1 2006

Official: Armenia and Azerbaijan discussing terms of Nagorno-Karabakh
referendum

The Associated Press
Published: December 1, 2006

YEREVAN, Armenia: Armenia and Azerbaijan are discussing terms of
holding a referendum on the status of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh
region, Armenia’s foreign minister said Friday.

Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous region in Azerbaijan, has been under
control of Armenian and ethnic Armenian Karabakh forces since the
1994 end of a separatist war.

Years of negotiation have produced little visible sign of progress in
resolving the dispute, which prompted Azerbaijan to close its borders
with Armenia. But the presidents of both countries said this week
that significant progress has been made.

Armenian foreign minister Vardan Oksanian said that the question of
whether the region could be autonomous within Azerbaijan was a key
issue in negotiations.

"A resolution to this problem can be found only by a referendum, a
proposal for which is contained in the document that the sides are
discussing."

He said the referendum was proposed to take place "on the territory
of Nagorno-Karabakh, with people who live there and lived there
taking part."

Nagorno-Karabakh’s ethnic Azeri population fled the conflict more
than a decade ago and large numbers of them have lived as internally
displaced people since then.

Armenia ready for cooperation with ICRC

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Dec 1 2006

ARMENIA READY FOR COOPERATION WITH ICRC

YEREVAN, December 1. /ARKA/. Armenia is ready for cooperation with
the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in implementing
educational programs, RA Minister of Education and Science Levon
Mkrtichyan stated at his meeting with Director of the ICRC office in
Armenia Yves Arnoldy and other ICRC representatives.
The Minister thanked the ICRC delegation for implementing an
educational program in the country’s comprehensive schools.
The ICRC is also implementing an educational program of disseminating
knowledge of international humanitarian law among schoolchildren.
Under the program textbooks were elaborated for 5th and 7th formers.
Manuals for teachers are also available. Optional classes were
organized.
A survey conducted by the ICRC this summer to determine the program’s
efficiency showed much better awareness of international humanitarian
law among schoolchildren in Armenia. P.T. -0–