What Must Be Changed In Our Country

WHAT MUST BE CHANGED IN OUR COUNTRY
Naira Hayrumyan

Lragir.am
12 Sept 2007

The country expects changes. They expect new people in government who
will work in a new way. However, before starting anew it is necessary
to evaluate the past to know what needs to be changed. Certainly,
it is something that a think tank should deal with – to evaluate the
foreign, economic and social policies of the government over the past
decade. However, now we can already analyze what we can see with the
naked eye.

Over the past decade Karabakh has had regress regarding the foreign
policies. The NKR representatives do not take part in the talks, and
the conflict started to be viewed as a confrontation between Armenia
and Azerbaijan. The international mediators and the Armenian government
demonstrate that they do not make decisions without consulting the
Karabakh authorities. However, these do not replace full participation
of Karabakh in the talks.

The positive thing is the continuation of the cease-fire, as well as
the fact that Karabakh proved capable of existing independently and
even developing. The negative thing is too much dependence on Armenia
in foreign policies, passivity in information policies. Karabakh
has become a tacit space, and anyone except its citizens attends to
its fate.

In home policies too, there are two tendencies. The positive thing is
the full reconstruction within a few years after the devastating war.

All the infrastructures work – roads, energy, services. In addition,
new branches of economy emerged – mining and tourism. Apartments,
schools and hospitals are being built.

The negative thing is that despite having declared a liberal economy
the government continues to make most decisions. At martial law it
helps control economy and social problems, but this approach also
deprives many people of equal opportunities to run business.

Independent businessmen are highly dependent on government consumption,
tax officers, monopolies, regional "shadow" projects and the favor
of the government.

The negative thing about the economic policy is the lessening of
investments, which is due to the high risk, as well as the weakening
confidence of the Diaspora in the transitions in Karabakh.

In state building, there is considerable progress. In particular,
all the basic institutions of public administration have been shaped,
elections are held, the government agencies operate. The negative
thing about this is the deficiency of the democratic transition:
democratic institutions exist whereas the mechanisms which connect
them often fail. In particular, there is a parliament but it does not
perform a real supervising function. There are courts but they are
not perceived as arbiters of justice. There are a number of newspapers
but the public opinion does not shape public policies.

Each of the abovementioned disadvantages and advantages has its cause
and mechanism of existence. A realistic evaluation of the situation,
departure from political and personal interests and the desire to
build a normal country may become the basis for the activities of
the new government.

Very often the shortcomings in our life are explained by the absence
of a national doctrine, ideology. An average person cannot understand
what a national strategy is. He or she instinctively knows that the
goal of any government should be guaranteeing security of its citizens
in a definite territory, providing equal opportunities for life and
economic prosperity, as well as protecting the rights and dignity of
everyone. The goal of the government is to give a person freedom to
live and work without shortening other people’s freedom.

Unfortunately, the government often fails on its main function.

Moreover, it abuses its power to improve its own life. And it forgets
that it is supposed to serve people who share common interests in
the given territory.

And with regard to changes, the upcoming reforms should be viewed in
this light: the government must focus on man, the official must respect
a person. Will the president be able to get the public administration
work in this way? If yes, the reforms will be successful, and life
will improve. Meanwhile, if the government’s attitude toward people
remains the same, many will feel deceived.

BAKU: OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs To Visit Azerbaijan

OSCE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS TO VISIT AZERBAIJAN

TREND
10.09.2007 11:13:40

Azerbaijan, Baku / corr Trend K.Ramazanova / The OSCE Minsk Group
co-chairs will pay a next visit to Baku on 18 September, Elmar
Mammadyarov, the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister said on 10 September.

During the talks in Baku the diplomats will discuss prospects of
peaceable resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.

The conflict between the two countries of South Caucasus began in 1988
due to territorial claims by Armenia against Azerbaijan. Armenia has
occupied 20% of the Azerbaijani land including the Nagorno-Karabakh
region and its seven surrounding Districts. Since 1992, these
territories have been under the occupation of the Armenian Forces. In
1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which time
the active hostilities ended. The Co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group
(Russia, France and USA) are currently holding peaceful negotiations.

A. Arzumanian Being In Freedom Cannot Impede Further Examination Of

A. ARZUMANIAN BEING IN FREEDOM CANNOT IMPEDE FURTHER EXAMINATION OF CASE

Noyan Tapan
Sep 7, 2007

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. Arrest, the preventive punishment
chosen towards the former RA Foreign Minister, Alexander Arzumanian
has been changed into a signature on his not leaving the country,
as the investigation in the territory of Armenia is over and the
defendant’s being in freedom cannot impede the further examination
of the case. Noyan Tapan correspondent was informed about it by Sona
Truzian, the Spokesperson of the RA Prosecutor General. According to
her, the preliminary examination on the case continues: in particular,
at the request of the RA Prosecutor General’s Office the Russian
Prosecutor’s Office should implement some investigation activities
in the territory of that country.

It should be mentioned that A. Arzumanian is accused of money
laundering and had been under custody since May 10.

Branch Of Macademian Technologies Company To Be Established In Armen

BRANCH OF MACADEMIAN TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY TO BE ESTABLISHED IN ARMENIA

Noyan Tapan
Sep 7, 2007

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. A delegation of representatives
of Armenian IT sector that visited Ottawa in August and Macademian
Technologies, the biggest Canadian IT company, signed a protocol
on establishment of a branch of Macademian Technologies in
Armenia. According to the RA MFA Press and Information Department,
the company officially announced it on September 6.

The Armenian branch, which is the third foreign unit of the company,
will focus on developement on mobile technologies.

Information on Macademian Technologies’ new Armenian branch is
available at:

www.armembassycanada.ca.

Luciano Pavarotti, 1935-2007

LUCIANO PAVAROTTI, 1935-2007

RTE.ie, Ireland

Sept 6 2007

Luciano Pavarotti was born on the outskirts of Modena in north-central
Italy, the son of Fernando Pavarotti, a baker and singer, and Adele
Venturi, a cigar factory worker. Although he spoke fondly of his
childhood, the family had little money its four members crowded into
a two-room apartment.

His father had a fine tenor voice but rejected a singing career because
of nervousness. World War II forced the family out of the city in 1943.

For the following year they rented a single room from a farmer in the
neighbouring countryside, where young Pavarotti developed an interest
in farming.

Pavarotti’s earliest musical influences were his father’s recordings,
most of them featuring the popular tenors of the day – Beniamino Gigli,
Giovanni Martinelli, Tito Schipa and Enrico Caruso.

At nine he began singing with his father in a small local church
choir. Also in his youth he had voice lessons with a Professor Dondi
and his wife.

After a normal childhood with a typical interest in sports – in
Pavarotti’s case soccer above all – he graduated from the Schola
Magistrale. He was interested in becoming a professional soccer player,
but his mother convinced him to train as a teacher.

He subsequently taught in an elementary school for two years but
finally allowed his interest in music to win out.

Recognising the risk involved, his father gave his reluctant consent.

Pavarotti began serious study in 1954 at the age of 19 with Arrigo
Pola, a respected teacher and professional tenor in Modena who, aware
of the family’s indigence, offered to teach without remuneration. It
was then that Pavarotti became aware that he had perfect pitch.

At about this time he met Adua Veroni, whom he married in 1961.

When Pola moved to Japan later, Pavarotti became a student of Ettore
Campogalliani, who was also teaching Pavarotti’s childhood friend,
the now well-known soprano Mirella Freni.

During his years of study Pavarotti held part-time jobs in order to
help sustain himself – first as an elementary school teacher and then,
when he failed at that, as an insurance salesman.

The first six years of study resulted in nothing more tangible than a
few recitals, all in small towns and all without pay. When a nodule
developed on his vocal chords causing a ‘disastrous’ concert in
Ferrara, he decided to give up singing.

Pavarotti attributed his immediate improvement to the psychological
release connected with this decision. Whatever the reason, the
nodule not only disappeared but, as he related in his autobiography,
‘Everything I had learned came together with my natural voice to make
the sound I had been struggling so hard to achieve.’

Pavarotti made his opera debut in the role of Rodolfo in La bohème on
29 April 1961 in the town of Reggio Emilia. He made his American debut
with the Greater Miami Opera in February 1965, singing in Donizetti’s
Lucia di Lammermoor opposite Joan Sutherland in the Miami-Dade County
Auditorium. The tenor scheduled to perform that night was ill and
had no understudy. As Ms Sutherland was traveling with him on tour,
she recommended the young Pavarotti as he was well acquainted with
the role.

Shortly after, Pavarotti made his La Scala debut in La bohème. After
an extended Australian tour he returned to La Scala where he added
Tebaldo from I Capuleti e i Montecchi to his repertoire in March
1966, with Giacomo Aragall as Romeo. His first appearance as Tonio
in Pagliacci took place at Covent Garden on 2 June that year.

He scored another major triumph in Rome on 20 November 1969 when
he sang I Lombardi opposite Renata Scotto. This was recorded on a
private label and widely distributed, as were various takes of his
I Capuleti e i Montecchi, usually with Aragall.

Early commercial recordings included a recital of Donizetti and Verdi
arias (the aria from Don Sebastiano was particularly highly regarded),
as well as a complete L’elisir d’amore with Sutherland.

His major breakthrough in the US came in February 1972, in a production
of Donizetti’s La fille du regiment at New York’s Metropolitan Opera,
in which he drove the crowd into a frenzy with his nine effortless
high Cs in the signature aria. He achieved a record 17 curtain calls.

Listen to Pavarotti’s high Cs

>From then on he began to make frequent television performances, such
as in his role as Rodolfo (La bohème) in the first Live From The Met
telecast in March 1977, which attracted one of the largest audiences
ever for a televised opera.

He won many Grammy awards and platinum and gold discs for his
performances.

In addition to those already mentioned, his La favorita with Fiorenza
Cossotto and his I puritani with Sutherland stand out.

He made his international recital debut at William Jewell College
in Liberty, Missouri, in 1973 as part of the college’s Fine Arts
Program. Perspiring before the debut, he asked for a handkerchief
and was given a white dinner napkin. The prop became a regular part
of his act from then on.

At the beginning of the 1980s, he set up The Pavarotti International
Voice Competition for young singers, performing with the winners
in 1982 in excerpts of La bohème and L’elisir d’amore. The second
competition in 1986 staged excerpts of La bohème and Un ballo in
maschera. The third competition in 1989 again staged performances of
L’elisir d’amore and Un ballo in maschera. The winners of the fifth
competition accompanied Pavarotti in performances in Philadelphia
in 1997.

Pavarotti’s pivotal step in becoming an internationally known
celebrity occurred in 1990 when his rendition of Giacomo Puccini’s
aria, ‘Nessun Dorma’ from Turandot, became the theme song of the BBC
TV coverage of the 1990 FIFA World Cup in Italy. The aria achieved
pop status and remained his trademark song.

This was followed by the hugely successful Three Tenors concert held
on the eve of the World Cup final at the ancient Baths of Caracalla
in Rome with fellow tenors Placido Domingo and Jose Carreras and
conductor Zubin Mehta, which became the biggest selling classical
record of all time.

Throughout the 1990s, Pavarotti appeared in many well-attended outdoor
concerts, including his televised concert in London’s Hyde Park
which drew a record attendance of 150,000. In June 1993, more than
500,000 listeners gathered for his performance on the Great Lawn of
New York’s Central Park, while millions more around the world watched
on television. The following September, in the shadow of the Eiffel
Tower in Paris, he sang for an estimated crowd of 300,000.

Following on from the original 1990 concert, Three Tenors concerts
were held during the Football World Cups; in Los Angeles in 1994,
in Paris in 1998, and in Yokohama in 2002.

Pavarotti’s rise to stardom was not without occasional difficulties,
however. He earned a reputation as ‘The King of Cancellations’ by
frequently backing out of performances, and his unreliable nature
led to poor relationships with some opera houses. Ardis Krainik of
the Lyric Opera of Chicago severed the house’s 15-year relationship
with the tenor. Over an eight-year period, Pavarotti had cancelled 26
out of 41 scheduled appearances at the Lyric and the move by Krainik
to ban him for life was well-noted throughout the opera world, after
the performer walked away from a season premiere less than two weeks
before rehearsals began, saying pain from a sciatic nerve required
two months of treatment.

He also sang with U2, in the band’s 1995 song Miss Sarajevo.

In 1998, Pavarotti was presented with the Grammy Legend Award.

In 2002 Pavarotti split with his manager of 36 years, Herbert
Breslin. The breakup, which was acrimonious, was followed in 2004 by
the publication of a book by Breslin entitled The King & I, largely
critical of the singer’s acting (in opera), his ability to read music
and learn parts, and of his personal conduct.

In an interview in 2005 with Jeremy Paxman on the BBC, Pavarotti
rejected the allegation that he could not read music, though he
acknowledged he sometimes had difficulty following orchestral parts.

He held two Guinness World Records: for receiving the most curtain
calls (165) and for the best selling classical album (In Concert
by The Three Tenors, shared by fellow singers Placido Domingo and
Jose Carreras).

Also in 2003 he married his former personal assistant, Nicoletta
Mantovani, with whom he already had a daughter, Alice.

He started his farewell tour in 2004, at the age of 69, performing
one last time in old and new locations, after over four decades on
the stage.

Pavarotti gave his last performance in an opera at the New York
Metropolitan Opera on 13 March 2004 and received a 12-minute standing
ovation for his role as the painter Mario Cavaradossi in Tosca. In
December 2004 he announced a 40-city farewell tour to be produced by
Harvey Goldsmith.

On 10 February 2006 Pavarotti sang ‘Nessun Dorma’ at the 2006 Winter
Olympics Opening Ceremony in Turin. The final act of the opening
ceremony, his performance received the longest and loudest ovation
of the night from the international crowd.

Pavarotti’s one venture into film, a romantic comedy called Yes,
Giorgio (1982), was roundly panned by the critics. He can be seen to
better advantage in Jean-Pierre Ponnelle’s adaptation of Rigoletto
for television, released that same year, or in his more than 20 live
opera performances taped for television between 1978 and 1994, most
of them with the Metropolitan Opera, and most available on DVD.

In March 2005, Pavarotti underwent neck surgery to repair two
vertebrae. In June of the same year, he had to cancel a Three Tenors
concert in Mexico due to laryngitis.

In early 2006, he had back surgery and contracted an infection while
in the hospital, forcing cancellation of concerts in the US, Canada
and the UK.

Pavarotti was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in July 2006 and
required emergency surgery to remove the tumour. Shortly after surgery
he was reported to be ‘recovering well.’ His remaining appearances
for 2006 were cancelled, but his management anticipated that his
farewell tour would resume in early 2007.

On Thursday 9 August 2007, he was hospitalised for observation
in Modena.

On 5 September, it was reported that his health had deteriorated and
the singer was in a ‘very serious condition’. He was reported to be
in and out of consciousness multiple times, suffering kidney failure.

Luciano Pavarotti died in the early morning of 6 September at home
surrounded by his wife and four daughters.

Pavarotti annually hosted the ‘Pavarotti and Friends’ charity
concerts in his home town of Modena in Italy, joining with singers
from all parts of the music industry to raise money for several worthy
UN causes.

Concerts were held for War Child, and victims of war and civil unrest
in Bosnia, Guatemala, Kosovo and Iraq. After the war in Bosnia, he
financed and established the Pavarotti Music Centre in of Mostar to
offer Bosnia’s artists the opportunity to develop their skills. For
these contributions, the city of Sarajevo named him an honorary
citizen in 2006.

He performed at benefit concerts to raise money for victims of
tragedies such as an earthquake in December 1988 that killed 25,000
people in northern Armenia.

He was a close friend of Diana, Princess of Wales. They raised money
for the elimination of land mines worldwide. He was invited to sing at
her funeral service, but declined, as he felt he could not sing well
‘with his grief in his throat’.

In 1998, he was appointed the UN Messenger of Peace, using his fame
to raise awareness of UN issues, including the Millennium Development
Goals, HIV/AIDS, child rights, urban slums and poverty.

In 2001, Pavarotti received the Nansen Medal from the UN High
Commission for Refugees for his efforts raising money on behalf of
refugees worldwide.

Through benefit concerts and volunteer work, he raised more than
US$1.5m, more than any other individual.

–Boundary_(ID_HQdjPwCcC/XMKNVp9Wt6Ug )–

http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0906/pavarottil1.html

Armenian group urges No Place For Hate action

Armenian group urges No Place For Hate action

By Patrick Ball
Bedford Minuteman
Thu Sep 06, 2007, 11:34 AM EDT

Bedford, Mass. –

By Patrick Ball
Staff Writer

The present state of Anti-Defamation League affairs, regarding the
organization’s national stance on the Armenian genocide, has some
residents pushing for Bedford to revoke its ADL-sponsored No Place For
Hate designation to become no place for denial.

A group of area Armenian-American advocates at-large Tuesday urged the
Violence Prevention Coalition, which also serves at the No Place For
Hate advisory committee, to server ties with the Anti-Defamation
League until the organization unambiguously acknowledges the massacre
of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during WWI was a genocide and supports
Congressional affirmation of the genocide as such.

The committee No Place For Hate "should not wait for the ADL" to
reevaluate their stance at their Nov. 1 meeting, because "waiting is
showing tolerance toward hate," said Berge Jololian, a Cambridge
resident who’s followed this issue since July.

The Violence Prevention Coalition is a local advisory committee and No
Place For Hate is one of the programs it advises on. Therefore, it is
not within the committee’s purview to withdraw from No Place For Hate,
said Committee Chairwoman Sue Baldauf. Any decisions regarding No
Place For Hate would have to be made by the selectmen and Town
Manager.

Baldauf, who is also the director of Bedford Youth and Family
Services, informed the advocates she has been talking with the ADL
about the issue, and that she would "love to have a local program to
educate the community about the Armenian genocide."

After discussion the Armenian appeal, the VPC voted to recommend
selectmen to reconsider Bedford’s status as a No Place For Hate
community because of the ADL’s ambiguous stance on the Armenian
genocide.

"This is an emotional issue, and there is no precedent for a local
group like this to take a stand on an international issue that I know
of," Baldauf said.

The No Place For Hate program’s stance relative to the ADL puts it in
a precarious position, said Baldauf, emphasizing that the committee’s
decision is "not a statement against the No Place For Hate program at
all."

A group of Bedford residents first came together after finding out the
Armenian genocide issue would be discussed and "got the ball rolling
based on the events in surrounding communities," said Stephen
Dulgarian, of Bedford.

The group is circulating a petition requesting that the No Place For
Hate leadership "issues a public statement opposing Turkey’s
state-sponsored campaign to deny the Armenian Genocide and call on its
sponsor, the Anti-Defamation League, through its National Director Mr.
Foxman, to openly and unequivocally acknowledge the Armenian Genocide
and support congressional affirmation of this crime against humanity."

Dulgarian said he is "pretty sure" the group plans to get on the
selectmen’s Aug. 17 agenda.

>From 1915 to 1923, Ottoman Turks massacred as many as 1.5 million
Armenians. The Turkish government rebuffs the genocide label
Armenians, historians, and some European nations use to characterize
the killings.

This issue was brought to light by a July 6 letter in the Watertown
Tab. Just over a month later, the Watertown Town Council decided to
pull out of the No Place For Hate program in protest of the ADL’s
refusal to recognize the massacre as genocide.

Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, has flip-flopped on the
issue in recent months. First, he refused to recognize the massacre as
genocide and fired Andrew Tarsy, ADL’s New England regional director,
for publicly opposing the organization’s national stance. Then, less
than two weeks later, he acknowledged the Armenian Genocide and
rehired Tarsy. Still, Foxman adamantly opposes a Congressional
resolution. In an Aug. 21 press release, he said such a resolution
would be a "counterproductive diversion" that could put both the
"Turkish Jewish community and the important multilateral relationship
between Turkey, Israel and the United States" at risk.

Source: 286

http://www.townonline.com/bedford/homepage/x942962

Does "A1+" Know More Than ARF

DOES "A1+" KNOW MORE THAN ARF

A1+
[05:31 pm] 06 September, 2007

Ter-Petrosyan will not disturb ARF much

"We will not bother much if Ter-Petrosyan runs for presidency",
said Artashes Shahbazyan, secretary of the "Armenian Revolutionary
Federation – Dashnaktsutyun" about the 2008 presidential elections.

Although the candidature of Ter-Petrosyan will not disturb the party,
Mr Shahbazyan hopes that Ter-Petrosyan will not be nominated for
presidential election. "Ter-Petrosyan has the status of everlasting
X president. In case he runs for presidency he will always be
an everlasting loser". In Shahbazyan’s opinion, interests of
Ter-Patrosyan and the "Armenian Pan-National Movement" party may
contradict each other today. "The "Armenian Pan-National Movement"
party is not actively engaged in politics today and if goes on like
this, who knows what will remain of the party in 5 years".

If the interests of Ter-Petrosyan and the "Armenian Pan-National
Movement" party coincide and Ter-Petrosyan puts forward his candidacy,
will the ARF change its strategy? To the question of A1+ Artashes
Shahbazyan answered: "Let him be nominated.

Ter-Petrosyan cannot be a rival to the ARF".

The "Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun" is going
to compete with the candidate of the "Armenian Republican Party"
Serge Sargsyan and defeat him. "Only those who have more chances
should run for presidency in 2008. If the "Armenian Republican Party"
and the "Prosperous Armenia" party are protecting the idea of one
united political candidate, the ARF will be their rival, taking into
consideration the number of votes gathered during the parliamentary
elections and its position in the parliament. The ARF has a program
and a team", said Shahbazyan.

Shahbazyan promised to tell the name of the ARF representative who
would defeat Serge Sargsyan later.

He only mentioned that the ARF would participate in presidential
election with its own candidate and was in the process of choosing
the best candidate.

According to Artashes Shahbazyan, the RA President is considering the
candidatures of 10 representatives from the ARF, but did not tell their
names. He only agreed to confirm or deny the names enumerated by A1+.

Thus, the ARF is circulating the names of Vahan Hovhannisyan, Armen
Rustamyan, Hrant Margaryan and other members of Dashnaktsutyun. The
ARF considers that its main rival during the presidential election
will be Serge Sargsyan.

As confirmed Artashes Shahbazyan, the ARF had presented its proposals
to ARP from the very beginning. He did not exclude that after 2008
elections the ARF could be the part of the Government.

Would not it be logical of the ARF protected the candidate of the
coalition, or may be the fact that Serge Sargsyan once halted the
activities of the ARF does not allow the party to protect Serge
Sargsyan’s candidature? To the question of A1+ the representative
of the "Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun" Artashes
Shahbazyan responded: "May be you know more than I do?"

Russians Close To Buying Another Major Armenian Enterprise

RUSSIANS CLOSE TO BUYING ANOTHER MAJOR ARMENIAN ENTERPRISE
By Emil Danielyan

Eurasia Daily Monitor, DC
Sept 5 2007

A Russian financial-industrial group looks set to acquire an
Indian-owned company that develops the bulk of Armenia’s gold
reserves. The deal, if it goes through, will give a further boost to
Russia’s already strong economic presence in the South Caucasus states
resulting from not only its traditional geopolitical orientation
but also the vested interests of Armenian leaders. The Armenian
government has clearly been the driving force behind the takeover,
having effectively forced Vedanta Resources, a mining conglomerate
owned by Indian billionaire Aneel Agarwal, to sell the Ararat Gold
Recovery Company (AGCR) earlier this year.

AGCR, which extracts and smelts ore from the country’s two largest gold
deposits, was set up in 1998 as an Armenian-Canadian joint venture. The
Indians purchased it in 2002, pledging to make large-scale capital
investments and increase its production. They apparently have not
fulfilled those pledges, with AGRC output steadily (and inexplicably)
declining in recent years despite record-high world prices of gold. In
2005, the Yerevan government accused AGRC management of underreporting
production and evading millions of dollars in taxes. The company
managed to avoid hefty fines at the time, reaching a murky out-of-court
settlement with the authorities.

But its fate was essentially sealed last January when Armenian
prosecutors raided the AGRC offices in the southern town of Ararat,
home to the company’s gold smelter. (Both the smelter and the AGRC
mines at Meghradzor and Zod have stood idle since then.) Shortly
afterwards Vedanta was accused of large-scale tax fraud and licensing
and environmental violations. The prosecutors pressed the charges in
early August, formally asking Armenia’s Economic Court to fine the
company $22 million.

Top AGRC executives rejected the case as baseless, accusing the
government of squeezing Vedanta out of the country. Still, the Indian
tycoon apparently had no choice but to put up his Armenian subsidiary
for sale. The Russian group Promyshlennye Investments promptly emerged
as its most likely buyer, opening takeover talks with Vedanta early
this summer. Reports in Armenian and Russian media have said that the
two sides are close to reaching an agreement whereby AGRC will be
sold to a Georgian subsidiary of Promyshlennye Investments for $86
million. A spokesman for the Russian company declined to confirm or
refute those reports last week, saying only that the talks should be
over by mid-September.

In the meantime, representatives of the Prosecutor-General’s Office
failed to turn up for the first court hearing on the lawsuit against
AGRC, which was due to take place on August 20. This was another
indication that the main purpose of the fraud case was a change of
the AGRC ownership and that the Armenian authorities will drop it
should the would-be takeover materialize.

Incidentally, the authorities moved against Vedanta immediately after
President Robert Kocharian’s January meeting in Sochi with his Russian
counterpart, Vladimir Putin. Economic ties were reportedly high on
the agenda of the talks. The two leaders met again in the Russian
Black Sea city on August 23. In televised remarks, Putin noted
"the truly allied character" of the Russian-Armenian relationship
and welcomed the 70% surge in bilateral trade registered during the
first half of this year. His spokesman, Sergei Prikhodko, was quoted
by the Itar-Tass news agency as saying that Kocharian "highly rated
Russian business interest in investing in his country."

That interest has visibly grown in the past several years. Russian
energy giants like Gazprom and Unified Energy Systems have won control
over much of Armenia’s energy sector as a result of controversial swap
agreements that allowed Yerevan to repay its debt to Moscow and avoid,
until 2009, a rise in the price of Russian natural gas. In addition,
a leading Russian mobile operator, Vimpelcom, bought the Armenian
national telephone company, ArmenTel, from the Greek telecom giant
OTE late last year. Another Russian telecom giant, MTS, is showing
strong interest in Armenia’s largest mobile phone network, currently
owned by Lebanese investors.

The Russians are now keen to extend their presence to other sectors
of the Armenian economy, notably mining. The purchase of AGRC would
be a major addition to their Armenian holdings. Its largest Zod
deposit, located in eastern Armenia, contains an estimated 80 tons of
gold. According to Armenian press reports, Russian companies may also
soon get hold of the country’s two cement plants, owned by wealthy
businessmen close to Kocharian and his most influential lieutenant,
Prime Minister Serge Sarkisian.

Kocharian and Sarkisian continue to ignore the serious concerns
about Armenia’s growing economic dependence on Russia expressed
by opposition politicians and independent observers. The two men
have heavily relied on the Kremlin in dealing with their political
opponents throughout their nearly decade-long joint rule. They have
clearly been willing to pay any price for continued Russian support,
be it economic assets or a particular foreign policy orientation.

That support will be essential for the success of Sarkisian’s plans
to succeed Kocharian in a presidential election due early next year.

Kocharian is also seeking Moscow’s backing for securing his own
political future. What he wants to do after completing a second
and final term in office is less certain, though. The Yerevan daily
Haykakan Zhamanak claimed on August 14 that he is lobbying the Kremlin
to merge all Russian-controlled Armenian enterprises into a single
consortium and appoint him as its chief executive.

(Hayk, August 30; Zhamanak Yerevan; August 29; RFE/RL Armenia Report,
August 28, August 2; Itar-Tass, August 23; Haykakan Zhamanak,
August 14)

RA FM And NATO Secretary General Discussed Bilateral Cooperation

RA FM AND NATO SECRETARY GENERAL DISCUSSED BILATERAL COOPERATION

DeFacto Agency
Sept 5 2007
Armenia

September 4 RA FM Vardan Oskanian met with NATO Secretary General
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer in Brussels.

According to the information DE FACTO received at RA MFA Press
Office, at the beginning of the meeting Armenia’s FM had noted the
importance of realization of Individual Partnership Action Plan,
in part, the elaboration of RA national security, establishment of
the NATO Information Center in Yerevan, the process referring to the
opening of the crisis management center in Armenia and legislative
initiatives targeted at amendments in the sphere of defense.

Vardan Oskanian highly estimated the assistance rendered by the NATO
member states to Armenia, especially consultative aid.

In the course of the meeting the parties referred to the organization
of Armenia-NATO political consultations in "26+1" format and in this
context RA FM noted the importance of holding political consultations
with the Alliance on RA foreign policy and security.

RA FM and NATO Secretary General also considered some issues referring
to Armenia’s participation in NATO peacemaking operations.

The interlocutors exchanged views concerning Kosovo issue, situation
in Afghanistan and regional processes.

On NATO Secretary General’s request Armenian Foreign Minister presented
the course of Karabagh talks.

On A Vulgar And Dangerous Tendency

ON A VULGAR AND DANGEROUS TENDENCY

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
Sept 5 2007
Armenia

An extremely vulgar and dangerous tendency is being observed in our
public moods: a tendency of finding fault with one’s own country,
outraging it and, what’s more, gloating over its failures as well as
the negative assessments made by the others. Listen to the street
rumors and read some newspapers! There is so much "self-criticism"
contained in them!

We are not, naturally, against criticism. We speak about having a sense
of proportion. As well as a realistic character. These are mandatory
for the welfare of the country, society and the people. We are not
against the freedom of speech and democracy. We are the supporters
of democracy, this is who we are. With one difference only – we are
mature. Just like the countries where it has existed for a long time.

Because, those countries do not have anything that reminds of a fanatic
self-criticism. They do not have a specific culture of criticism. They
are restrained and balanced. Whereas we have parties, politicians
and media who exclusively specialize in using bad language in their
country’s address.

There are simply no such activists and parties in the West, if we
speak about more or less significant figures.

In this sense, the United States once gave the world a good example.

What initiatives did the authorities undertake when our country rushed
down into the abyss of the Great Depression during the first three
decades of the past century? On the one hand they were trying their
best to mitigate the conversations about the existing misfortune,
and on the other hand – inspire the nation with optimism.

And the slogan was this: the problem does not consist in the
difficulties; the most important thing is not to be afraid of them,
at that time everything will come right. And all the mass media
supported such policy with solidarity.

Without waiting for one another’s turn, all the political figures,
under the leadership of President Roosevelt, started inoculating
optimism in public consciousness. During the meetings of the owners
representing the film-producing companies of Hollywood a decision
was made to overflow the country with patriotic films, as well as
contemporary and historical themes.

And instead of mass and nationwide self-exposure – something which
seemed to be imposed by the situation – there began a nationwide
self-praising. Did it help? Of course, it did. And it has served as
a kind of unwritten law ever since.

In other Western countries the situation is similar in many aspects;
public attention, whether past or present, never focuses on "negative
phenomena" in a pointblank manner (or rather, it is never made to
focus on such matters). While here, in Armenia, conversations about
the country’s misfortunes and faults is the most common and widespread
topic for discussion. The people will listen to them and even add
something new. The situation in the West is just the contrary: nobody
will make any response to such conversations.

American schools indoctrinate patriotism from the earliest ages.

There is even a special law "on Patriotism". In Western Europe
everything is done in a more delicate manner. But there too, a thousand
of methods are being used to breed pride for the nation.

Yes, we and the West are on different poles in terms of our national
self-consciousness (national self-assessment). What exists in our
reality is self-scourging and self-criticism, while in the West there
is pride for the country and the people.

In our reality, most different people using bad language in the
country’s address are sure they are doing a fair job. Only by way of
raising an incessant alarm about the country’s negative phenomena will
it be possible to achieve their eradication. Is it so in reality,
however? Whether there is no destructive wave of common hatred,
stemming from the "sea" of self-exposure?

Summing up the above-mentioned statements, we become faced with an
exclusive situation, existing in no other place of the world.

Different sources violently inoculate in public consciousness streams
of negative assessments in our country’s address, like colossal and
permanent toxic injections. Those "inoculations" differ from one
another in terms of their contents. But they produce a general,
synthesized result: this country is worth nothing. Wherever you
look and whatever you discuss, there is an abyss, full of negative
phenomena.

This is why, it is so common to us not to see our own shortcomings
the way they are and instead, exaggerate the things; and be driven
to despair on any occasion. Yes, this is a national characteristic,
which, however, was created artificially. The kind of the individual
that has developed in our reality is original and quite common:
one who sees nothing good all around and criticizes everything.

But how long is it possible to look upon one’s own country with the
eyes of an ill-disposed stranger?