Skip to main content

Armenian Food Safety Agency urges to avoid panic buying citing sufficient reserves

Save

Share1

 15:12,

YEREVAN, MARCH 14, ARMENPRESS. All relevant governmental structures are focused on food security issues and there won’t be any food problems for at least the next 2-3 months, the Director of the Food Safety Inspection Agency Georgy Avetisyan said at a press conference.

“We maintain contact with our colleagues in Russia and other countries. There is no need for panic, there is no need to buy so much food,” Avetisyan said, calling on citizens to avoid panic buying. “All relevant structures are dealing with all food security issues. Negotiations are underway to be able to ensure it in the future as well,” he added.

Avetisyan said Armenia comprises a very small percentage in Russian exports volumes. He further noted that he believes that food products exported to Armenia will not harm food security in Russia.

Asked whether or not prices will grow in the event of importing grain from countries other than Russia, Avetisyan said prices will indeed grow. Other major grain producing countries are far from Armenia, one being Canada and the other Australia. Importing from these countries will be expensive, he said. Avetisyan noted that all possible risks are being taken into account.

Speaking about the possible problems with seeds, Avetisyan said there are no problems from seed importers.

Candidate for President of Armenia presents his visions about economy development

Save

Share

 12:18, 2 March, 2022

YEREVAN, MARCH 2, ARMENPRESS. Candidate for President of Armenia Vahagn Khachaturyan says reducing corruption, increasing competitiveness, developing high technological economy and expanding the regional cooperation are important for the development of the economy.

During the parliamentary debate over his candidacy, in response to the question what kind of an economic policy needs to be run for having a competitive state, Mr. Khachaturyan said it’s not a coincidence that when Armenia’s economic future was being discussed after the 2018 Velvet Revolution, he emphasized that only if the corruption decreases, competitiveness increases and alternative becomes more, that would be the best boost for the economic development.

“Now I repeat the same that corruption must decline, and competitiveness, alternatives must increase. These are the best tools that will contribute to Armenia’s economic development”, he said.

Talking about alternatives, he stressed that the country must think of alternatives.

“The problem is the following: we should have a high technological economy. We can understand everything under it. We have no alternative, we have lost the opportunity, which we had for becoming so, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. We have lost those technological, human, equipment potential which we had during the Soviet times. We must restore this. Our ministry was engaged with this work. There were some, very little achievements”, he said.

By saying alternatives, Khachaturyan means also expanding the regional cooperation, opening roads. “These are the alternatives, the opportunities which will open a big path for our economy’s development”, he added.

Azerbaijani press: Armenian ex-leader’s fraudulent embezzlement schemes

By Ayya Lmahamad

Nowadays, it is clear that the situation in which the Armenian government now finds itself, with no ability to participate in the financing of any projects, occurred because all of the country’s leaders when they came to power, were only engaged in corruption and embezzlement of state budget funds.

Former Armenian President Armen Sarkissian’s fraud schemes were exposed by the Swiss newspaper Süddeutsche, which published an international journalistic investigation by SuisseSecrets based on leaked bank account information. Sarkissian, according to the information, fled with a sum in excess of $10 million.

According to the newspaper, the number of Armenian citizens or people associated with Armenia in the leaked data exceeds 500, and the number of bank accounts exceeds 400, including Armen Sarkissian and his family members.

Thus, the former president and his sister’s Credit Suisse bank account contained more than ten million Swiss francs. It should be noted that the account was established in 2006 and was serviced until 2016. The ex-president did not declare the funds in this account.

To recall, in September 2013 Armen Sarkissian was appointed Armenian ambassador to the United Kingdom, and from that moment, according to law, he became “a person obliged to submit a financial declaration”.

However, when analyzing the declarations submitted to Armenia’s Corruption Prevention Commission, it becomes clear that neither in the declaration upon assuming the post of ambassador in 2013, nor in the annual declaration of 2014, 2015 and 2016 the former president indicated the above-mentioned funds.

Furthermore, the Armenian Hraparak newspaper recently reported that Sarkissian owns property in Switzerland, which he denies. According to the same newspaper, one of the most likely reasons for Sarkissian’s resignation is his dual citizenship in the Caribbean.

The Baku-based news website Day.az notes that Sarkissian appears to have decided to follow in the footsteps of Levon Ter-Petrosian, Robert Kocharian, and Serzh Sargsyan and that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is doing the same.

In mid-January of this year, Armenian journalists learned that the bookmakers Vivaro Media and Toto Gaming had transferred 5 million drams and 1 million drams, respectively, to one of Pashinian’s funds, City of Smile. Furthermore, tycoon Khachatur Sukiasyan donated 3 million drams to this fund, according to Day.az.

“The foundation is ostensibly a ‘charitable’ foundation, but it is unclear for what purpose the funds were transferred. This has caused consternation among Armenian citizens, who are speculating on social media that it could be a bribe or money laundering,” according to the news website.

In addition, a closed report on corruption in Armenia was distributed in Brussels in March 2019. According to the report’s authors, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is the country’s most corrupt official, with an estimated €1.5 billion in embezzlement.

In Wake of New GAO Report, SFRC Chairman Menendez Calls for Increased Oversight of U.S. Assistance to Azerbaijan

Senate Foreign Relations Committee
In Wake of New GAO Report, SFRC Chairman Menendez Calls for Increased
Oversight of U.S. Assistance to Azerbaijan
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Chairman of the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today released the below statement
following the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) publication of
a new report that found that the State Department failed to comply
with reporting requirements for reviewing U.S. assistance to the
Government of Azerbaijan.
Senator Menendez requested the report in June 2020 to review U.S.
assistance to Azerbaijan and specifically whether any assistance had
been used for offensive purposes against Armenia or Nagorno-Karabakh.
For years, the U.S. has continued to make exceptions to bypass a 1992
law banning most U.S. military assistance to the Government of
Azerbaijan. Using a waiver under Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support
Act, the exemption requires the State Department to certify the
purposes of the assistance and report on the impact of that assistance
to Congress.
The new GAO report found that over several years, the Department of
State and Department of Defense failed to meet statutory reporting
requirements to Congress on the impact of U.S. assistance on the
military balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
“The human consequences of the terrible war in Nagorno-Karabakh
underscore the deep concerns that I have long had about providing U.S.
assistance to Azerbaijan,” Chairman Menendez said. “This report finds
that, for several years, the State Department consistently failed to
provide sufficient details about the quantity of assistance to
Azerbaijan, the status of the military balance, and the impact of the
assistance on peace negotiations. These findings are further proof
that the status quo is unacceptable, and we must exercise additional
scrutiny over the U.S. government’s ongoing provision of assistance to
Azerbaijan. In the coming weeks, I will be renewing my efforts for the
State Department to reconsider any future planned assistance to
Azerbaijan, respect Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act, and
improve its reporting to Congress in the future.”
Three months after Senator Menendez requested the report, Azerbaijan
launched an egregious attack on Nagorno-Karabakh that led to the
deaths of 6,500 people. Today, Armenians continue to grapple with the
human costs of that war on a daily basis. Baku continues to hold
scores of Armenian prisoners of war in their jails—an open wound for
their families who are unsure of their relatives’ fate or condition.
The war has uprooted nearly 100,000 ethnic Armenians who lost their
homes and livelihoods.
Specifically, the GAO found that:
    State’s reporting to Congress from FY 2014-FY 2021 did not address
required elements, including the impact on proposed assistance on the
military balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
    State’s Memorandums of Justification contained limited or no
details regarding quantity of assistance, status of the military
balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the impact of U.S. assistance
on the military balance, or the impact of the assistance on peace
negotiations.
    State’s 2021 guidance did not provide detailed instructions to
agencies about reporting requirements to Congress.
    State and DOD did not document their consideration of waiver
requirements from FY 2014-FY 2020, including how they determined
assistance would not be used for offensive purposes against Armenia.
 

Dominant parliamentary faction declines proposal to put condemnation of Shushi Declaration on agenda

ARM INFO
March 1 2022
Naira Badalian

ArmInfo.The dominant parliamentary faction Civil Contract has declined a draft statement condemning the so-called Shushi  Declaration by the Azerbaijani and Turkish  Parliaments.

On February 23, the dominant parliamentary faction thwarted the  opposition’s attempt to convene a special meeting of Armenia’s  Parliament to discuss the issue by not securing a quorum.  Armenia’s  Parliament was to hold a special meeting on the initiative  of the  Armenia opposition faction, on Wednesday, to discuss the  Shushi  Declaration. The opposition faction proposed that the RA  National  Assembly issue a statement condemning the ratification of  the Shushi   Declaration and “expressing deep concern over the  ratification by  the  Azerbaijani and Turkish Parliaments of the  declaration the  Azerbaijani and Turkish presidents signed in the  Azerbaijan-occupied   Shushi on June 15, 2021.” Back on June 15 and  17, 2021, Armenia’s  foreign office issued relevant statements.  

According to Mr Arsenyan, the statements contained all the key points   incorporated in the opposition-proposed draft. He believes the  Parliament’s position must be identical to that of the foreign   office.  In their 2021-2026 programme of action Armenia’s authorities   declared a policy of long-lasting peace and stability and are   implementing their foreign policy in line with the programme, with a   view of causing no harm to the declared policy.  The  opposition-proposed document reads that despite the assurances   that  the Shushi Declaration is not aimed at a third party, its   content  is obviously against the Armenian people.  “It sets the   strategic  goals of the two nations that carried out a 44-day   aggression  against the Republic of Artsakh, against Artsakh’s  self-determination, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the    Republic of Armenia, and the rights of the Armenian people, which    survived a genocide and was scattered throughout the world,” Mr    Tevanyan said. 

The wordings concerning the “Zangezur corridor” contained in the   declaration are evidence that Turkey and Azerbaijan are reaching    public agreements on implementation of joint expansionist programmes.   The authors of the statement also condemn the Azerbaijani-Turkish   agreement on struggling against international recognition of the    Armenian Genocide by distorting the essence of the problem and    turning it into a subject of historical research. 

“The Shushi Declaration is not based on the UN Charter or the    OSCE-approved security principles.  Rather, it is based on the  ‘ethnic   security’ approach, which is in conflict with the  fundamental international legal norms. According to the Vienna  Convention on the   Law of Treaties of 1969, all the international  treaties that are in   conflict with the imperative international  legal norms are not   legitimate. 

The provocative and destructive Shushi Declaration is   unacceptable  to the Republic of Armenia. It is a serious challenge to  regional  and global security, which does not contribute to our   region’s  peaceful development, is in conflict with normalization of    Armenian-Turkish relations without preconditions and arouses serious    doubts about official Ankara’s real intentions,” the draft statement    reads.  

Reflection on the “Armenia-Iran: Historical Past and Present” International Conference

Weekly columnist Yeghia Tashjian pictured with Iranian diplomats, conference organizers and participants at the Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Yerevan

The Iranian Studies Department of the Oriental Studies of the Armenian National Academy of Sciences, together with the Iranian Cultural Center of the Embassy of Islamic Republic of Iran at Yerevan and Yerevan State University, organized a two-day international conference from February 9-10, 2022 titled “Armenia-Iran Historical Past and Present” dedicated to the establishment of diplomatic relations between both countries. There were more than 20 speakers, diplomats and scholars (Armenians and Iranians), and I was one of them. Iranian-Armenian MPs Robert Beglarian and Ara Shaverdian were also in attendance.

The conference aimed to highlight the history of Armenian-Iranian relations, ranging from political and cultural to economic relations and came up with recommendations to push this relation to different levels. The Iranian Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Armenia H.E., Mr. Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri in his opening speech for the conference highlighted the geostrategic importance of the Iran-Armenia border; the decision of the Iranian government to open a consulate in Kaban, Syunik; the geopolitical significance of the North-South Transport Corridor; and increasing the trade turnover between both countries to $1 billion.

Weekly columnist Yeghia Tashjian with the Iranian Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Armenia H.E. Mr. Abbas Badakhshan Zohouri

The following topics were addressed:

Armenian scholars pointed to the civilizational relations between both states, the importance of preserving the current border, the Pan-Turkic threats and Iran’s passive diplomacy during the 2020 Artsakh war. They also expressed concerns regarding the threat of the “Zangezur Corridor” and Azerbaijan’s territorial claims on Armenia.

Iranian scholars pointed out that the 2020 war on Artsakh was not just a war against Armenia, but also Iran. They hinted that by establishing a “Zangezur Corridor,” Turkey-Azerbaijan-Israel are trying to cut Iran’s alternative routes to Europe and Russia. They stressed the importance of the North-South Corridor for both countries, the increase of trade turnover to more than $1 billion and negotiations regarding the free economic zone in Meghri.

Interestingly, none touched on possible military cooperation between both countries.

My Recommendations for the Strengthening of Armenia-Iran Relations

In my concluding speech during the conference, I came up with the following recommendations:

If in the future, Iran joins the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), it would have better access to Eurasian, Russian and European markets. This accession would also provide EAEU member states with increased access to the Persian Gulf and increase trade and give stronger impetus and incentive for both sides (Iran and other EAEU members) to pursue common interests in third-party states like in the Levant. So Russia and Iran would have stronger cooperation in the Levant and other regions. Hence, they will work to protect their shared economic interests. Therefore, with the unblocking of regional trade routes, in the long run, Armenia would have access to the Levantine markets and reach the Eastern Mediterranean by rail. Iran should facilitate this project so that Armenia would have access to the seas through Iran and not Turkey.

Both Armenia and Iran could launch rapid joint cooperation through joint venture plans and also through Iran’s investments in Armenia’s highways, especially from the Norduz border crossing to Yerevan in order to widen the capacity of the North-South Corridor. From the Iranian perspective, this would widen not only Armenian-Iranian and regional trade, but also promote Iran’s geo-economic interests in Armenia. Such steps may further attract Indian, Chinese and European investments, which would empower Armenia’s security and stability.

Both Armenia and Iran can also have military cooperation for the sake of regional stability and to ensure that geopolitical borders of regional countries will remain stable and unharmed, especially in Armenia, and to ensure that states like Israel and the US will not try to make a scapegoat of Armenia and weaken Armenia for the sake of their plans in the Caucasus. For this reason, an intelligence cooperation center should be created both in Armenia and Iran where both sides can share, analyze and assess regional threats and terror activities that may expose a threat to both countries and regional securities. To facilitate this process, direct communication channels must be established between the security service institutions of both countries. The target of this initiative should be pan-Turkic and Jihadi terrorist groups,

Opening an Iranian consulate in Syunik is the right step; however, a military coordinator/attaché is needed to analyze the military developments on the border and directly report to Tehran. The opening of the consulate will pave the way for other states to take similar steps and preserve Armenia’s sovereignty with international backing on Syunik.

Communication needs to be enhanced between Armenia and the Diaspora communities in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon in order to compare and assess Iranian intentions and policies in the Middle East and South Caucasus. These communities can act as secondary embassies to facilitate communication and information sharing between different Iranian and pro-Iranian organizations and the Republic of Armenia. For these reasons, having strong communities in Lebanon and Syria is in the interest of both Armenia and Iran. 

After our conference, the Iranian ambassador invited us for a reception at his embassy hall. During a three-hour meeting, in a positive atmosphere, we discussed with the Iranian ambassador and the diplomats about the current challenges and the future of bilateral ties between both countries, geopolitical concerns and threats, and provided suggestions.

Conclusion and Reflection 

From this conference and meeting with Iranian diplomats and scholars, I have come to the following conclusion. 

  • Armenia cannot expect more from Iran. Iran has done its share and now expects Yerevan to positively respond. Iran will never militarily intervene in any possible future border crisis between Armenia and Azerbaijan. What Iran can do is to use some hard power to send messages (military exercises, redeployment of forces in the north). Iran cannot alienate and antagonize its large Iranian-Azeri community which is fully integrated into the Iranian society.
  • Iran is satisfied with the current status quo (even though it acknowledges that it has so many gaps), as long Russia doesn’t lose its sphere of influence in the Caucasus. For the time being, Iran cannot alone compete with the rising Turkish influence. 
  • Iran supports peace and economic growth in the region. The Iranian economy needs markets to export its products and modernize its industry. The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan was, to some extent, an obstacle to push for trade activities in the region. Now that both sides are engaging in “dialogue” through Russia, Iran is pushing its geo-economic ambitions forward. 
  • The North-South Transport Corridor is crucial for Iran. Iran proposed many ideas for Armenia, but is still waiting for a response from Armenian authorities. 
  • Armenia, with its Christian cultural heritage, is seen as a successful model for the Iranians to provide a civilizational dialogue and Christian-Islamic harmony and a role model that Iran can engage in similar models with other Christian countries in the world, namely the West.
  • Armenia and Iran have done so little to strengthen their cultural, trade, and political ties. 
  • For now, military-technological (arms industry) cooperation is out of the question. 
Yeghia Tashjian is a regional analyst and researcher. He has graduated from the American University of Beirut in Public Policy and International Affairs. He pursued his BA at Haigazian University in political science in 2013. In 2010, he founded the New Eastern Politics forum/blog. He was a research assistant at the Armenian Diaspora Research Center at Haigazian University. Currently, he is the regional officer of Women in War, a gender-based think tank. He has participated in international conferences in Frankfurt, Vienna, Uppsala, New Delhi and Yerevan. He has presented various topics from minority rights to regional security issues. His thesis topic was on China’s geopolitical and energy security interests in Iran and the Persian Gulf. He is a contributor to various local and regional newspapers and a presenter of the “Turkey Today” program for Radio Voice of Van. Recently he has been appointed as associate fellow at the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut and Middle East-South Caucasus expert in the European Geopolitical Forum.


AW: Russia–Azerbaijan Declaration on Allied Interaction: Implications for Armenia

Declaration on “Allied Interaction between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation” signed in Moscow, February 22, 2022

Since February 24, 2022, the world’s attention has been focused on the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the US and European Union (EU) sanctions imposed on Russia. Politicians, experts and academicians are seeking to understand how and when the war will stop and what will be the short and midterm implications of Western sanctions on Russia and beyond. Armenia is not an exclusion, and debate is underway on the war’s potential political and economic implications on Armenia. However, the Russia-Ukraine war is not the only issue hotly debated in Armenia.

On February 22, just a day after the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics’ independence and two days before the launch of the Russian special military operation, Russia and Azerbaijan signed a declaration on allied interaction in Moscow. Given the existence of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, the deployment of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno Karabakh after the 2020 Karabakh war and the alliance between Russia and Armenia, the declaration on Russia-Azerbaijan allied interaction raised questions and concerns in Armenia. Article one of the declaration states that the Russian Federation and the Republic of Azerbaijan build their relations on the basis of allied interaction, mutual respect for independence, state sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of the state borders of the two countries. The critical question raised by Armenian experts touches upon the implications of this wording on the future of Nagorno Karabakh.

Meanwhile, to better understand what was signed by the two presidents and what implications it may have on South Caucasus regional geopolitics, it is worthy to briefly analyze the bilateral Russia-Azerbaijan relations after the collapse of the Soviet Union. While the first president of independent Azerbaijan Ayaz Mutalibov sought to maintain good relations with Russia, the second president Abulfaz Elchibey, who came to power in the summer of 1992, pursued an overt anti-Russian and pro-Turkish foreign policy based on the ideology of pan-Turkism. Elchibey’s foreign policy was a source of concern for Russia and Iran. 

After the military coup ousted Elchibey in June 1993, the longtime leader of Soviet Azerbaijan, Heydar Aliyev, returned to power. He sought to normalize relations with Russia, hoping to get Kremlin support in the war against the Nagorno Karabakh Republic. Azerbaijan joined the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in 1993; however, it did not help Azerbaijan gain significant successes during its December 1993 major offensive in Karabakh. After the May 1994 ceasefire agreement, President Aliyev pursued balanced foreign policy. He deepened Azerbaijan’s connections with Western energy giants by signing a “Contract of the Century” in September 1994. However, Aliyev was smart enough to include Russian Lukoil in these deals. 

In 1997, Azerbaijan joined Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova to establish GUAM, which was perceived as an organization to balance Russian influence in the post-Soviet space. As another manifestation of its balanced foreign policy, Azerbaijan signed a treaty of friendship, partnership and mutual security with Russia in the same year. The treaty’s first article declared that countries would base their relations on the principles of respect of territorial integrity and inviolability of borders, almost identical to the wording used in the February 2022 declaration. In 1999, Azerbaijan did not renew its participation in the Collective Security Treaty with Russia and some other post-Soviet states. 

Azerbaijan-Russia relations entered a new phase after the election of Vladimir Putin in 2000. In January 2001, Russia and Azerbaijan signed a Baku declaration during President Putin’s visit to Azerbaijan. They declared their intention to raise bilateral relations to the level of strategic partnership. The declaration mentioned the two states’ intention to develop long-term military and military-technical cooperation and again emphasized that Russia and Azerbaijan will base their relations on the principles of territorial integrity and inviolability of borders. Another essential step in bilateral relations was the January 2002 statement of presidents. Speaking about the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, Russia and Azerbaijan emphasized that regional conflicts should be solved based on the principles of international law and, first of all, on the principles of territorial integrity and inviolability of the internationally recognized borders of states.

President Ilham Aliyev sought to continue the balanced foreign policy of Azerbaijan. The launch of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum pipelines provided a solid base for rapid economic growth for Azerbaijan. In the early 2010s, Azerbaijan rejected signing an Association Agreement with the EU or joining the Eurasian Economic Union. Baku used its oil money to buy weapons from Russia, while the crackdown on Azerbaijani civil society in 2013-2014 negatively impacted Azerbaijan-West relations. The growing assertiveness of Russia in the post-Soviet space, the results of the 2008 Russia-Georgia war, 2014 events in Ukraine, the shift of US focus to the Asia Pacific, and the changes in Russia-Turkey relations since 2016 towards more cooperation and less competition have created an impression in Azerbaijan that Russian influence will increase in the region and that Baku should adapt to that reality. The 2020 Karabakh war was another demonstration that regional players such as Russia and Turkey would play a growing role in defining the parameters of the regional security architecture, while the US, NATO and EU influence will continue to decrease. 

The February 2022 declaration of allied interaction is another element of Azerbaijan’s strategy of adaptation to this reality. As we can see, the wording about territorial integrity, inviolability of borders and military and military-technical cooperation has been in bilateral relations since 1997. The only novelty of the declaration, besides symbolically raising the bilateral relations from strategic partnership to alliance level, perhaps is the provision stating that parties will deepen interaction between the armed forces, including holding joint operational and combat training activities and developing other areas of bilateral military cooperation. Another significant issue is the provision, according to which Russia and Azerbaijan may consider the possibility of providing each other with military assistance based on the UN Charter, separate international treaties, and taking into account the existing international legal obligations of each of the parties.

How may this declaration impact Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia? Azerbaijan and Russia made a tacit deal: Russia recognizes Nagorno Karabakh de jure as part of Azerbaijan, while Azerbaijan accepts de facto control of Russia over the small portion of Karabakh not invaded by Azerbaijan during the 2020 war. This declaration sends a clear signal that, most probably, Azerbaijan will not demand the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Karabakh in 2025. Does this mean that Russia will never recognize Karabakh independence? No. The situation in and around Karabakh resembles the situation in Abkhazia and South Ossetia from the mid-1990s until 2008, or the situation in Donetsk and Lugansk between February 2015-February 2022. In both cases, Russia de jure recognized these territories as part of Georgia and Ukraine while de facto controlling them. However, this does not prevent Russia from recognizing these entities’ independence due to the changing geopolitical environment. Thus, the task of Armenia and Armenians as a nation remains the same. Armenia should do its best to secure foreign military deployment in Nagorno Karabakh for at least the next 10 to 15 years. Another significant task is to increase the number of Armenians living there by at least 25 to 30 percent for the same period and modernize the Armenian economy and armed forces to protect Nagorno Karabakh without foreign forces if such a scenario becomes a reality.

Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies. He was the former vice president for research – head of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense Research University in Armenia. In March 2009, he joined the Institute for National Strategic Studies as a research Fellow and was appointed as INSS Deputy Director for research in November 2010. Dr. Poghosyan has prepared and managed the elaboration of more than 100 policy papers which were presented to the political-military leadership of Armenia, including the president, the prime minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Dr. Poghosyan has participated in more than 50 international conferences and workshops on regional and international security dynamics. His research focuses on the geopolitics of the South Caucasus and the Middle East, US – Russian relations and their implications for the region, as well as the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. He is the author of more than 200 academic papers and articles in different leading Armenian and international journals. In 2013, Dr. Poghosyan was a Distinguished Research Fellow at the US National Defense University College of International Security Affairs. He is a graduate from the US State Department Study of the US Institutes for Scholars 2012 Program on US National Security Policy Making. He holds a PhD in history and is a graduate from the 2006 Tavitian Program on International Relations at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.


The California Courier Online, March 3, 2022

1-        Russia-Ukraine War: This is What Happens
            When Compromise is not Achieved
            By Harut Sassounian
            Publisher, The California Courier
            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

2-        Artsakh Welcomes Putin’s Recognition of Parts of Ukraine as
Independent States

3-     Armenian journalist Aprikyan becomes national primetime news anchor in US

4-     Letters to the Editor

5-      Armenia Continues Fight Against COVID-19

************************************************************************************************************************************************

1-         Russia-Ukraine War: This is What Happens

            When Compromise is not Achieved

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

What is happening right now in Ukraine is the worst possible scenario
for both sides, in fact all sides.

First of all, this is an enormous tragedy for the people of Ukraine
who have fallen victim to the Russian invasion which should have been
avoided at all costs. No one can justify the destruction of a country
and the killing of innocent people. We should support peace, common
sense and safety of all human beings.

Let us ignore the unrelenting propaganda, misinformation,
disinformation and hypocrisy which have inundated the media before and
during the war. No need to play politics or partisanship with people’s
lives.

Let us now move from emotional statements to the real world which can
only be ignored at our own peril. Since the beginning of the world,
the powerful has always imposed his will on the weak. There is no
escape from this. It has always been this way and will continue to be
this way. All those who believe in truth and justice are sadly
mistaken. They live in a make-believe world.

Russia, as a powerful country, felt that it was being threatened by
Western powers encroaching on its sphere of influence and wanted to
protect its national interests. Whether we agree or disagree with the
Russian view is immaterial. This is how the Russians perceive the
situation. And when you are a powerful country, right or wrong, you
try to impose your will on others, one way or another. The precedent
for this situation is the Russian invasion of the Republic of Georgia
in 2008 when the latter flirted with the idea of joining NATO. Russia
occupies large parts of Georgia to this day.

Those in the West who have been making sanctimonious statements about
big bad Russia attacking an innocent country are conveniently
forgetting how the western countries themselves behaved for decades,
even centuries. The imperial powers of the United Kingdom, France,
Spain, Germany, and Italy went around the world conquering dozens of
smaller, poorer and weaker countries, subjugated them, plundered their
natural resources, killed and wounded hundreds of thousands of
natives, until they rose up and tossed the aggressors out.

The United States, the self-declared paragon of democracy and human
rights, has attacked and occupied several countries in the past
imposing its will around the world. The U.S. government has overthrown
many leaders who have refused to toe its line and submit to America’s
wishes. There are dozens of such examples, the latest of which is
Iraq. Who can forget the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when the Soviet
Union deployed nuclear missiles in Cuba, just 90 miles away from the
United States? The two countries came to the brink of nuclear war on
that occasion. There is also the long-standing U.S. policy of the
Monroe Doctrine which states that any intervention in the political
affairs of the Americas by foreign powers is considered a hostile act
against the United States. How is this different from Putin’s
interpretation of Russia’s sphere of influence in Eastern Europe,
including Ukraine? Finally, Pres. Biden’s actions against Russia are
partially prompted by his intent to raise his record low rating of
37%. The latest Washington Post/ABC News poll showed that only 33% of
Americans approve Biden’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine crisis, while
47% disapprove.

It would have been preferable to engage in direct negotiations between
Russia and Ukraine to find a peaceful solution to the crisis. As it is
often said, “war is diplomacy by other means.” The more outside powers
such as the United States, France and the United Kingdom meddled in
this dispute, the worst it got, since each of these countries,
pretending to defend Ukraine, were in fact pursuing their own
interests. The crux of the issue is the disagreement between Russia
and the West about an alleged pledge made by the West after the
collapse of the Soviet Union that NATO will not expand to Eastern
Europe, threatening Russia’s security. Nevertheless, NATO did expand
to several Eastern European countries, which Russia viewed as a
hostile act.

Russia decided to impose its will on Ukraine, fearing that if it did
not act promptly, Ukraine would join NATO, after which it would be
impossible to neutralize the perceived danger, due to the NATO policy
of “attack on one member country is deemed an attack on all.”

There should have been a compromise found on both sides to avoid war.
Most people thought that there would be no war and that Russia was
amassing troops on Ukraine’s border to pressure it to reach a
compromise solution. Regrettably, the Russian attempt to influence
Ukraine ended in a full scale invasion destroying large parts of the
country’s infrastructure and causing untold casualties. It could be
that Ukraine refused to compromise relying on Western assurances that
it would come to its aid militarily and economically, if it resisted
Russian demands not to join NATO. In addition to providing military
hardware and economic assistance, Western countries tried to block
Russia’s actions by issuing a series of draconian sanctions, which
failed to alter its decision. The hopeful news is that Russian and
Ukrainian delegations held their first direct talks on Monday and
agreed to meet again.

Turning to the effects on Armenia of the war and sanctions on Russia,
Armenia is caught in the middle of its alliance with and reliance on
Russia and its standing with the rest of the world. As they say, when
two elephants jostle, the ant gets stomped on, regardless of which
elephant wins.

The biggest problem that Armenia has is the absence of a competent
leader who would be able to come up with a skillful solution to
extricate itself from this extremely complicated situation. Since the
start of the war, Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has not
made an official declaration. Nevertheless, on three separate
occasions, Armenia has taken sides and made statements regarding this
conflict.

The most problematic action Armenia took was last Friday when the
Council of Europe voted to suspend Russia’s membership in the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Committee of
Ministers. Armenia was the only country that voted with Russia against
the measure. Forty two countries voted yes. Turkey shrewdly abstained
and Azerbaijan did not vote at all. Western countries will not look
too kindly at Armenia’s support for Russia. Likewise, Russia will not
look too kindly at Azerbaijan’s and Turkey’s votes. The war in Ukraine
is sure to limit Turkey’s ability to walk on a tightrope between NATO
and Russia. Azerbaijan’s similar tightrope walk will also be curtailed
by not voting with Russia in the Council of Europe, thus undermining
the declaration of “allied cooperation” signed on Feb. 22 by Russia
and Azerbaijan.

Secondly, when Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Vahan Hunanyan,
was asked if Armenia will join Russia in recognizing the
“independence” of the Ukrainian regions of Donesk and Lugnask, he
replied: “There is no such issue on [Armenia’s] agenda.” Putin will
not be pleased with that answer. He has many ways to pressure
Pashinyan to toe the Russian line in this crisis.

Finally, speaking at a meeting of the Eurasian Intergovernmental
Council in Kazakhstan on February 25, Pashinyan suggested that prompt
measures be taken “to minimize or circumvent” the anti-Russia
sanctions approved by the West following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The anti-Russia sanctions are sure to have a major impact on Armenia’s
frail economy as Russia is Armenia’s largest trading partner. As they
say, when Russia sneezes, Armenia catches a cold. The $861 million
remitted in 2021 by Armenian workers in Russia to their families in
Armenia will be sharply curtailed due to the collapsing ruble and
increased unemployment.

There is also a long-standing controversy between Armenia and Ukraine.
Both sides accuse each other of betraying their trust and siding with
their enemies.  In 2014, Armenia, along with nine other countries,
voted with Russia against a UN General Assembly resolution which
declared the pro-Russian Crimean referendum invalid. Armenians respond
by recalling that Ukraine voted in the General Assembly in 2008, for a
resolution demanding the withdrawal of “Armenian forces” from Nagorno
Karabagh. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine announced during the
2020 Artsakh war: “We support Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and
sovereignty just as Azerbaijan always supports our territorial
integrity and sovereignty.” Furthermore, Ukraine sold lethal weapons
to Azerbaijan prior to the 2020 war.

One should not forget that there are around 500,000 Armenians who live
in Ukraine. When other countries shut down their embassies in Ukraine
and withdrew their nationals, the Armenian Embassy continued
functioning and Armenian nationals remained in Ukraine risking their
lives.

With each passing day, more innocent civilians are being killed in
Ukraine, more sanctions are being imposed on Russia and more ominous
threats are being issued. Common sense should prevail before the world
reaches a doomsday scenario.

The only solution is reaching a compromise through peaceful
negotiations. Eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth will leave everyone
blind and toothless.
************************************************************************************************************************************************
2-         Artsakh Welcomes Putin’s Recognition of Parts of Ukraine as
Independent States

President Arayik Harutyunyan of Artsakh welcomed Russia’s recognition
of the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, hailing it as
an imperative for people’s right to self-determination. Artsakh’s
parliament speaker also issued a similarly-worded statement.

During a televised address, President Vladimir Putin of Russia
announced his intention to recognize the independence of the two areas
in the Donbass region of Ukraine, whose leaders have enjoyed Russia’s
backing.

Western leaders, however, were angered by Putin’s move and asserted
that the recognition gave the Russian leader more reason to fulfill
his plan of invading Ukraine.

“The right of nations to self-determination and building one’s own
state is inalienable for every people and is a fundamental principle
of the international law,” President Harutyuyan said in a statement.

“The establishment of an independent state and its international
recognition becomes an imperative especially in the face of
existential dangers, as it is the most effective and civilized means
of preventing bloodshed and humanitarian disaster,” he added.
Harutyunyan pointed out hat the Republic of Artsakh has been fighting
for its freedom, security and state-building for decades, and has been
exposed to many trials and genocidal actions.

“Thus, we hope that the Republic of Artsakh, which has relevant
indisputable historical, political, legal and moral bases, has earned
the international recognition of its sovereign state,” he said.

Yet, having declared its independence more than 30 year ago and over
the years functioning as an independent state, the recognition of
Artsakh was never brought up by Moscow, even during the 44-Day war in
2020.

Artsakh has relations with two other unrecognized states—Abkhazia and
South Ossetia—which declared their independence following Russia’s
military conflict with Georgia.

“We congratulate the people of Donbass on the legal-political
recognition of the self-determination of the two republics,”
Tovmasyan, the Artsakh parliament speaker, said in a statement
Tuesday, February 23.

The European Union, NATO, France and Great Britain reacted to Putin’s
recognition with harsh words, calling it a breach of international law
and an effort to undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty.
************************************************************************************************************************************************

3-         Armenian journalist Aprikyan becomes national primetime
news anchor in US

ATLANTA—Tatevik Aprikyan has been named the new host of “The
Why”—Newsy’s primetime news program.

“The Why,” which premiered earlier this month on the nation’s only
free 24/7 broadcast news network, goes beyond the headlines with
hyper-visual explanatory journalism and compelling guest interviews.
Aprikyan has been at the helm of an hour-long deep dive into relevant
social, cultural and political topics.

“This will be unique programming for primetime viewers,” said Eric
Ludgood, head of Newsy. “Tatevik is an experienced journalist with
great storytelling skills and a knack for engaging audiences.”

Aprikyan has been an award-winning broadcast journalist in Seattle
since 2015. Prior to that, she was an anchor and/or reporter in
Providence, Rhode Island; Idaho Falls, Idaho; Seattle and Bellevue,
Washington.

She has been an anchor or reporter for ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC affiliate
stations. Aprikyan has covered some of the country’s biggest stories,
including the trial of the Boston Marathon bomber, the Ebola outbreak,
Affordable Care Act, US-Russia and Middle East relations and health
care (autism, scientific research and children’s health).

Originally from Yerevan, Armenia, her family moved to Seattle when she
was five years old. Aprikyan speaks Armenian, Russian and French. She
is an advocate for children’s health, serving on the board of
directors for non-profits providing humanitarian relief to orphaned
children around the world.

Born in Armenia and raised in Eastlake and Kenmore, Tatevik Aprikyan
started “playing journalist” years before she became one.

Aprikyan remembers her father buying a camcorder as one of his first
American purchases.

“I would grab anything I could — a hairbrush, the blocks we were
playing with — and just go to work,” she recalled in a recent
interview with The Seattle Times. She would narrate whatever was in
view: an airplane in the sky, a bus driving past on the street.
Aprikyan spoke little English but she learned to emulate reporters
when her parents watched local newscasts.

“This is a special opportunity at Newsy,” Aprikyan said. “We are going
to provide viewers with the kind of information that offers insight
into the complex issues of the day. It’s the kind of work that
journalists live for. It’s a chance to make a difference for our
audience.”

Hank Mendheim is the executive producer of “The Why.” An Emmy
Award-winning television executive, Mendheim most recently served as
executive producer of WLS Television’s “Windy City LIVE” in Chicago.
His television producing career spans nearly three decades creating
news and entertainment programming for A&E, Bravo, Discovery Channel,
Nat Geo, Lifetime, Animal Planet, Sundance, Hallmark Channel, Oxygen,
MSNBC and The Weather Channel.

Viewers can watch Newsy over the air using their TVs’ built-in tuners
or digital antennas, on Newsy.com, as well as on streaming devices or
services, including Apple TV, Fire TV, Pluto TV, Roku, Samsung, Sling,
Vizio and Xumo. Newsy is owned by The E.W. Scripps Company, a
diversified media company focused on creating a better-informed world.
Scripps serves communities with quality, objective local journalism
and operates a portfolio of 61 stations in 41 markets.
**********************************************************************************************************************************************

4-         Letters to the Editor

Dear Editor:

Lori Yeghiayan Friedman’s op-ed article truly resonated with me. Like
her, both my parents were Armenian, and my grandma even came from the
same place, Aintab, as her medzmama. (“Finding in Little Armenia the
roots my parents tried to bury,” The California Courier, February 17)

For children of immigrants who are born in the United States,
attending public schools, socializing and marrying non-immigrant
Americans, while always having that cultural, religious and even moral
tie to our ancestry can be confusing.

As we grow older, we’re more comfortable about how our heritage fits
into our daily lives. We want to learn about it and visit our
homelands.

The ties that bind us to “our people” are very tight; they are a
permanent facet of our identities. But there should be no amot (shame)
to our evolution into our present-day culture.

Gloria Sefton,

Trabuco Canyon, Calif.

Dear Editor:

Friedman sends a very healthy message, not just to us Armenian
Americans, but to all ethnic Americans, especially children of
immigrants — that we each realize and preserve our ethnicities in
different ways and to different degrees, and that’s OK.

Shenorhagalutyoon (thanks), Ms. Friedman.

Susan Injejikian Henry,

Glendale, Calif.

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

5-         Armenia Continues Fight Against COVID-19
Armenia continues the fight against COVID-19, as the country continues
promoting the vaccination phase. Last week, some 100,620 doses of the
Pfizer vaccine for COVID-19 were imported to Armenia in accordance
with a contract signed between the Armenian Ministry of Health and the
Pfizer pharmaceutical company.

The Pfizer vaccine will be distributed to all primary health care
clinics and mobile vaccination sites, the Armenian Ministry of Health
said.

Armenia’s Ministry of Health announced on January 11 new restrictions
to curb the fast spreading of the Covid-19 pandemic in the country.
From January 22, people above 18 must present either a vaccination
certificate or a negative recent test result prior to entering
restaurants, hotels, cinemas and other similar venues.

As of January 30, 842,212 people have been fully inoculated against
COVID-19, or approximately 28-percent of the population. About
64-percent of the population, or 1,883,413 people, has received at
least one dose of the vaccine. The highest rate of inoculation is
among people between the ages of 35-60. Only 18 to 19-percent of
citizens over the age of 65 have received two doses of the vaccine.
The vaccination mandate for employees might be responsible for the age
disparity in vaccination rates.

Since October, employees have been required to provide proof of
vaccination or a negative PCR test every 14 days to their employer.
Employees who choose not to get inoculated against the coronavirus
must take tests at their own expense. A PCR test in Armenia costs
roughly 10,000 drams (about $20).

The MoH also instituted a coronavirus “green pass” in January to enter
cultural and entertainment venues. As of January 22, people can only
enter restaurants, hotels, gyms, libraries, museums, theaters, cinemas
and other cultural sites if they present proof of vaccination, a
negative PCR test from the previous 72 hours or an antibody test from
the previous 24 hours. The mandate, which was announced on January 9,
excludes children under the age of 18, pregnant women, people who
cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons and people who have been
previously infected with the coronavirus.

The Armenian government last month made changes in the COVID-19
response measures, shortening the recommended self-isolation time from
14 days to 7 days for vaccinated people and 10 days for unvaccinated
people starting the day of an administered PCR test. The
self-isolation period for the unvaccinated can be shortened down to 7
days in case of producing a negative PCR test result.

The Armenian government cited the policies of the United States CDC
and a number of European countries. The government changed airport
regulations, allowing visitors to enter the arrival hall by
maintaining safety guidelines. The decision took effect February 1.
Armenian health authorities recorded a peak number of positive
COVID-19 cases on February 2.

The U.S. State Department since July 26, 2021 issued a Level 3 Travel
Health Notice and has warned American citizens to reconsider travel to
Armenia due to the increase in cases of the Covid-19. The State
Department also urged U.S. citizens not to travel to the
Nagorno-Karabakh region due to armed conflict.

Coronavirus cases have been steadily increasing in Armenia since mid-January.

There were 9,694 active COVID-19 cases in Armenia as of March 3.
Armenia has recorded 419,382 coronavirus cases and 9,694 deaths;
401,677 have recovered.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

************************************************************************************************************************************************

California Courier Online provides readers of the Armenian News News Service
with a few of the articles in this week’s issue of The California
Courier. Letters to the editor are encouraged through our e-mail
address, . Letters are published with
the author’s name and location; authors are required to disclose their
identity to the editorial staff (name, address, and/or telephone
numbers for verification purposes).
California Courier subscribers can change or modify mailing addresses
by emailing .

Remain faithful to oath of office: Ombudsman Arman Tatoyan recaps 6-year tenure

Save

Share

 11:08,

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 23, ARMENPRESS. Crisis and difficult: this is how Human Rights Defender of Armenia Arman Tatoyan described his 6-year tenure.

Tatoyan gave a final news conference in his capacity as Ombudsman as his term in office is ending.

He said his term in office since day 1 was a difficult time period.

“Since day 1 we worked in difficult and crisis situations. During this period of time I was guided by important principles: remain faithful to the oath of office, do everything and do as much as necessary. The April War started after I took office. I was in Artsakh already on April 3. Then, ceasefire violations happened in Tavush and elsewhere. We’ve conducted fact-finding missions everywhere where it was needed,” Tatoyan said.

The year of 2016, when Tatoyan took office, was difficult. The Yerevan hostage crisis happened, when gunmen ambushed a police station. Tatoyan said the following year was also difficult because it related to the protection of rights and detention conditions of the arrested and jailed persons in the case of the police station ambush.

“Then, the events of April-May 2018 began,” Tatoyan said, referring to the Velvet Revolution. “We worked day and night. With our task forces, we frequently stayed overnight in police departments and jails to properly conduct our duties,” he said.

In July 2020, Azerbaijan attacked the province of Tavush, bombarding peaceful settlements. Tatoyan was carrying out fact-finding missions and maintained contact with international organizations.

The COVID-19 pandemic period was also tense for the Ombudsman. Tatoyan said they’ve been working in several directions: raising awareness, isolations, and supervision of governmental bodies.

The disastrous war which Azerbaijan launched in September of 2020 led to numerous victims and many were left with disabilities. Villages and towns were destroyed. Tatoyan said the Azerbaijani violations did not stop and continued in the direction of border towns.

“I have a feeling during this entire time as if we are still at war. We’ve had a significant increase of applications and complaints during our entire work. If there were 5214 written and verbal applications in the year of 2015, in 2020 there were 14,780, and 21,118 in 2021,” Arman Tatoyan said.

Tatoyan said the Ombudsman’s hotline also recorded rise in calls. In 2015 there were 2086 calls, in 2020 there were 11,735 and in 2021: 14,124:

Montenegro arrests Armenians who stole $18 million from covid fund in California

Feb 24 2022

Three criminals on the FBI’s most wanted list in a COVID-19 fraud scheme were detained in Montenegro. They have been searched since August 2021, when their relatives claimed they were kidnapped, but federal authorities said they turned off their location trackers and fled the state, according to NBC.

Federal authorities said Feb. 23 that three members of the San Fernando Valley family were detained in Montenegro, accused of removing their tracking bracelets and running away after they were convicted in $18 million COVID-19 fraud case.

Richard Ayvazyan, 43, his wife and co-defendant Marietta Terabelyan, 37, and his sister-in-law Tamara Dadyan, 42, were arrested on February 22 in a small mountainous country in southeastern Europe.
They have been missing since August 29 .

The three were among eight family members convicted of stealing more than $18 million in COVID relief loans and using the money for extravagant spending such as down payments on luxury homes, designer bags, clothes and a Harley-Davidson motorcycle.

It was not immediately clear how their extradition to the United States might end. The FBI had no immediate comment.

The strange story was like this from the start.

In November 2021, Ayvazyan and Terabelyan were sentenced in court despite a failure to appear, which their family says was due to their kidnapping, apparently to prevent them from revealing the identities of the uncharged accomplices, according to court documents.

The couple and two relatives were found guilty in June 2021 of conspiring to file fraudulent loan applications in which they and others received more than $18 million in paycheck protection and economic damage loan programs that they used to pay down payments for luxury homes. in Tarzan, Glendale and Palm Desert, as well as buying other high-end items such as gold coins, diamonds, jewelry, luxury watches, imported furniture, designer bags, clothing and a Harley-Davidson motorcycle.

Ayvazyan “harassed the elderly (including those with disabilities) and foreign exchange students who spent only a few months in the United States a few years ago and now live thousands of miles away in a foreign country,” prosecutors wrote.

The defendants were found guilty of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Ayvazyan was also found guilty of aggravated identity theft.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, a Los Angeles federal jury ruled that the defendants must confiscate bank accounts, jewelry, watches, gold coins, three houses, and about $450,000 in cash.

Evidence showed that the defendants used counterfeit or stolen personal data for fraudulent loan applications. In support of the allegations, the defendants also provided forged documents to creditors and the Small Business Administration, including forged identification documents, tax documents and payrolls, prosecutors said.

Before sentencing, four accomplices pleaded guilty to the felony charges.

However, the FBI said the couple, who face several years behind bars, removed their location tracking devices, left a note for their children, and escaped together from his home in Encino. The next day, a Los Angeles judge signed arrest warrants for them.

Ayvazian was sentenced in November to 17 years in federal prison and his wife to six years, according to US Attorney’s Office. Ayvazyan was the alleged mastermind of the criminal gang.