Armenian Church in UK calls on Azerbaijan to release Armenian POWs

Public Radio of Armenia

The Armenian Church in the UK has called upon Azerbaijan to release Armenian prisoners of war (PoWs) who remain captive following the autumn 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh, Barnabas Fund reports.

The Church issued a statement signed by Bishop Hovakim Manukyan, Primate of the Diocese of the Armenian Church in the UK and Ireland, condemning the continued imprisonment of PoWs.

The statement argues that Azerbaijan has failed to comply with the trilateral peace agreement, signed on 9 November 2020 by Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, which stipulated that both sides must “exchange prisoners of war, hostages and other detained persons”.

An estimated 200 Armenians – both military and civilian prisoners – are still held by Azerbaijan. Armenia, by contrast, has released all Azerbaijani PoWs following the conflict.

Both Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians, and Pope Francis have called upon Azerbaijan to release those still in captivity, as have political figures across Europe.  

The European Court of Human Rights has referred the situation to the European Council of Ministers after Azerbaijan failed to meet a deadline set by the court to submit information about the remaining prisoners.

The Church statement also notes the “ongoing psychological trauma of families waiting for their relatives to be returned”, especially those who “have received confirmation of torture or killing of their relatives directly to their phones or via social media”.

The statement adds that, “in the most recent blow”, on 9 April “families of Armenian prisoners of war waited hopefully at the Yerevan airport, only to be greeted by an empty plane sent by Azerbaijan.”

Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov has responded to international criticism of Azerbaijan’s actions by claiming without any evidence that Armenians who remain captive are “terrorists” and not prisoners of war, and that therefore that they should not be released.

Azerbaijan, supported by Turkey, began the invasion of Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnic-Armenian enclave within the Muslim-majority Republic of Azerbaijan, at the end of September 2020. The conflict ended in November with Azerbaijan having taken significant territories which had formerly been held by the Armenian community.

Nagorno-Karabakh (mountainous Karabakh) is part of the historic homeland of the Armenian people, who around 301 AD became the first Christian nation, and the region still contains many ancient churches and monasteries. Karabakh was placed within Azerbaijan by the USSR in 1923.

Armenian President, US Ambassador discuss current agenda of bilateral relations

Save

Share

 11:19, 9 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 9, ARMENPRESS. President Armen Sarkissian held a meeting with Ambassador of the United States to Armenia Lynne Tracy, the Presidential Office told Armenpress.

The current agenda of the bilateral relations was discussed during the meeting.

The Armenian President and the US Ambassador also exchanged views over the international and regional issues.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 08-04-21

Save

Share

 17:22, 8 April, 2021

YEREVAN, 8 APRIL, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 8 April, USD exchange rate up by 0.78 drams to 537.36 drams. EUR exchange rate down by 0.09 drams to 637.58 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate up by 0.05 drams to 6.97 drams. GBP exchange rate down by 3.22 drams to 738.28 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 70.27 drams to 30027.46 drams. Silver price down by 0.33 drams to 431.65 drams. Platinum price up by 376.15 drams to 21440.17 drams.

Russian, Armenian army chiefs discuss cooperation issues

Aysor, Armenia
April 1 2021

Chief of General Staff of Russian Armed Forces, Commander of the Army Valery Gerasimov had a phone talk with the Chief of General Staff of the Armenian Armed Forces Artak Davtyan, Russian MOD told the reporters.

“During the conversation the interlocutors discussed ensuring security in the region, implementation of peacekeeping mission as well as the situation and prospects of military and military-technical cooperation between Russia and Armenia,” the Russian MOD reported.

Earlier today Artak Davtyan met with the commander of Russian peacekeeping troops deployed in Nagorno Karabakh Rustam Muradov.

The two discussed the issue of return of POWs and search of missing.

Book by Saudi author unravels Ottoman atrocities in Madinah

Arab News, Saudi Arabia
Madinah, Saudi Arabia, circa 1915 when it was part of the Ottoman Empire. From Heroes of Modern Adventure, published 1927. (Getty Images/Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group)
Short Url
  • “Seferberlik” sheds light on forgotten pillage of the city by Ottoman Turks and the looting of its holy relics 
  • Saudi historian Muhammad Al-Saeed says modern Turkey is attempting to whitewash its cruel imperial past 

JEDDAH: Although the rot had long set in, it was the onset of the First World War in 1914 that truly exposed the Ottoman Empire’s weakness, backwardness and inability to control its distant extremities. 

When historians use the term “Seferberlik” — the Ottoman word for “mobilization” — it is often assumed they are discussing the ethnic cleansing of the Armenians of Anatolia in 1915, when millions were slaughtered or sent into exile. 

But Seferberlik is also used to refer to another lesser known episode of mass displacement that occurred around the same time in what is today Saudi Arabia. 

“Seferberlik: A century on from the Ottoman crime in Madinah” — by Saudi author Mohammad Al-Saeed — tells the story of the deportation of the holy city’s population by Ottoman General Fakhri Pasha. 




Saudi author Mohammad Al-Saeed. (Supplied)

History books tell of Fakhri Pasha’s “heroic defense” of the city in the 1918 Siege of Madinah, fending off repeated attacks by the British-backed Arab fighters of Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Makkah. 

What the books often gloss over are the happenings of 1915, prior to the siege, when Fakhri Pasha forced Madinah’s population into trains and drove them north into present-day Syria, Turkey, the Balkans and the Caucasus. 

Moreover, the version of events told in Turkey today tends to omit the Ottomans’ removal of the valuables of Prophet Muhammad’s sacred chamber, the demolition of buildings to make way for defenses and supply lines and the man-made famine’s cruel toll on Madinah’s remaining civilian population. 

“The Seferberlik crime was an attempt to transform Madinah into a military outpost,” Al-Saeed told Arab News. “The Turks tried to separate the city from its Arab surroundings and annex it to the Ottoman Empire to justify ruling what remained of the Arab world.” 




The army of Faisal I of Iraq coming into Yenbo (aka Yanbu), in the present-day Al Madinah province of western Saudi Arabia, during the Arab Revolt against Ottoman rule, December 1916. (Pierre Perrin/Sygma via Getty Images)

Against the wishes of the Ottoman Caliph Sultan Mehmed V, the Young Turks who dominated the empire’s affairs at that time had sided with Germany and the Central Powers. Their brand of Turkish ethno-nationalism spelled disaster for the empire’s other ethnic groups. 

The highly strategic Hijaz railway, which linked Damascus and Madinah, was vital to the Ottoman war effort, which made it a frequent target of the Arab rebels and their British ally, T.E. Lawrence. 

So important was this rail link for the movement of troops and munitions that Ottoman forces were prepared to displace Madinah’s civilian population and garrison its holiest sites, no matter the harm and disrespect their actions caused to the resting place of Prophet Muhammad. 

“General Fakhri Pasha came to prove the power of the Ottoman Empire over Madinah, no matter what the cost,” Al-Saeed said. “He took the Prophet’s Mosque and its sanctity and turned it into a weapons depot and a camp for soldiers. 

“He also transformed the city’s minarets into artillery positions, unconcerned about affecting the Prophet’s Mosque, the dome and the Prophet’s Tomb. 

“Furthermore, he confiscated the inhabitants’ possessions, their date farms and their crops, and turned them over to the military effort and to his soldiers, estimated to be around 70,000 mercenaries. They desecrated Madinah by drinking alcohol in the streets.” 




The Hijaz Railway was strategically vital to the Ottoman war effort. (Supplied)

In the second phase of Fakhri Pasha’s campaign, “he destroyed homes and extended the railway to inside the Prophet’s Mosque, disrespecting the sanctity of the mosque in another crime, for the purpose of facilitating the transport of valuables and items in the Prophet’s Chamber — the possessions of Prophet Muhammad and his wives — away from the eyes of citizens and out of fear of them, and in preparation for smuggling them to Constantinople,” Al-Saeed said. 

“The stolen treasures arrived in Constantinople, the Ottoman Empire’s capital, and have been on display for many years at the Topkapi Museum (in present-day Istanbul).” 

The holy relics include old copies of the Quran; jewelry and golden candlesticks; and swords. Besides the 390 artefacts, visitors to the museum can see the following possessions of Prophet Muhammad: the Blessed Mantle, the Holy Banner, his sword and bow, a jar, a piece of his tooth and a hair from his beard. 

Sources suggest Fakhri Pasha even attempted to have the body of Prophet Muhammad exhumed and shipped to Constantinople. An Egyptian engineer who was summoned to Madinah to modify the minarets of the Prophet’s Mosque to support the weight of Ottoman artillery claimed he was ordered to open the tomb, but he refused. 

“Fakhri Pasha asked for his help to exhume the body of the prophet and move it to Constantinople, according to the historical documents written by the French representative in Cairo and sent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,” Al-Saeed said. 




The Hijaz Railway was strategically vital to the Ottoman war effort. (Supplied)

“The French representative vouched for the account of the Egyptian engineer, who fled the city and did not carry out the crime, thus confirming that the grave in question did indeed house the prophet’s body and the goal was to move the body to Constantinople.” 

“In the last phase, the citizens of Madinah were forcibly displaced and soldiers were settled there instead,” Al-Saeed said. 

Possibly up to 40,000 civilians were deported, with parents separated both from each other and from their children.

“They kidnapped people from the streets and did not deport them as families. They deported them as individuals and sent them to other areas under Ottoman rule. 

“According to historical sources, the Seferberlik atrocities resulted in only a few hundred citizens remaining in the city. Fakhri Pasha ordered the monopolization of food, which was scarce in the first place, especially dates, which were given to the Ottoman soldiers. 

“Madinah reached the point of famine, forcing its citizens and orphaned children to eat cats, dogs and what remained on the farms and in the streets.” 




“Seferberlik: A century on from the Ottoman crime in Madinah” — by Saudi author Mohammad Al-Saeed.

Al-Saeed says he chose to write about the Ottoman Empire’s actions in Madinah a century on because he believes modern Turkey is trying to whitewash its imperial past. 

He plans to translate his book into several languages to raise awareness of this little-known chapter of Ottoman history. 

“I wrote an article in 2015 about the passage of 100 years since this crime and provided details that few people knew about,” Al-Saeed said. 

“Reactions to the article varied between people shocked at the information and those who could not believe it, given the Turkish publicity ahead of its publication which attempted to whitewash the Ottoman Empire’s ugliness and its heinous crimes against Arabs. The public was oblivious to the Ottoman crimes. 

“Following the article, the idea of documenting the event was established, so that history would not forget it like other events in Arab history, particularly since the few historical sources that documented Seferberlik are in the Ottoman, English and French archives. 

“Moreover, the sources of information are very limited and the grandchildren of those who were in Madinah at the time do not have many documents. A lot of the city’s inhabitants were displaced. Many of them did not return.” 

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 03/25/2021

                                        Thursday, 
Russian Language To Get Official Status In Nagorno-Karabakh
NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- Russian soldiers of the peacekeeping force man a checkpoint 
on a road outside Stepanakert, November 26, 2020
Elected representatives in Nagorno-Karabakh have approved a proposal to make 
Russian the Armenian-populated territory’s second official language.
The measure was proposed last month by three of the five political parties 
represented in Nagorno-Karabakh’s parliament. One of them, Free Fatherland, is 
led by Arayik Harutiunian, the region’s ethnic Armenian leader.
Earlier this month Harutiunian’s administration endorsed a relevant bill drafted 
by the three parties, paving the way for its passage.
The bill envisaging amendments to the region’s laws on the language as well as 
television and radio was passed with a vote of 27-0, with two abstentions.
It cites Nagorno-Karabakh’s history of “cultural, military and economic links” 
with Russia and says that giving Russian an official status would deepen them.
Its proponents have also argued that this would facilitate communication with 
Russian soldiers and aid workers deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh after last year’s 
Armenian-Azerbaijani war.
Russia’s presence in Nagorno-Karabakh increased dramatically after Moscow 
brokered a ceasefire agreement that stopped the six-week war on November 10. The 
deal led to the deployment of about 2,000 Russian peacekeeping troops in 
Nagorno-Karabakh as well as along a land corridor connecting the disputed 
territory to Armenia.
The peacekeepers have helped tens of thousands of Karabakh Armenians, who fled 
the fighting, to return to their homes.
But some Karabakh lawmakers have voiced objections to the bill. They include 
Metakse Hakobian of the opposition Artarutyun (Justice) party, one of the bill’s 
three co-sponsors.
Hakobian said on March 12 that the proposed legislation needed to be amended to 
guarantee the supremacy of the Armenian language. “Russian should have more of a 
working than official status and the two languages should not be equated,” she 
told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service then.
Several Karabakh academics have also spoken out against making Russian an 
official language. One of them, Yana Avanesian, said the bill in question was 
“unfounded” in its current form.
Free Fatherland’s Aram Harutiunian, one of the authors of the bill, insisted 
that Armenian will remain Nagorno-Karabakh’s main official language, while 
Russian will be used “when necessary.”
The bill passed by Nagorno-Karabakh’s elected representatives will become law 
upon signing by the region’s leader.
Still in February, Azerbaijan, which considers Nagorno-Karabakh to be its 
territory, condemned the region’s plans to give Russian an official status.
President Ilham Aliyev said at a press conference on February 26 that “there can 
only be one official language in Azerbaijan – the Azeri language.”
Earlier, the Kremlin described the matter as “an internal affair.”
“This is not a subject of talks, it is a de-facto situation when people speak 
Russian both in Azerbaijan and Armenia,” the Russian president’s spokesperson 
Dmitri Peskov said on December 2, according to TASS.
“This is an internal affair of any country – both Azerbaijan and Armenia,” he 
added.
Security Council Secretary Denies Army Chief Urged End To War Early On
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Armen Grigorian, secretary of the Security Council of Armenia. 
Armen Grigorian, secretary of Armenia’s Security Council, continues to insist 
that former chief of the Armed Forces’ General Staff Onik Gasparian did not call 
for a cessation of hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh on the fourth day of the war 
with Azerbaijan despite his claim.
Talking to media after a government session on Thursday, Grigorian said that for 
the first time the issue of stopping the war was raised at the Security Council 
on October 19, which was the 23rd day of the hostilities.
On November 17, a week after Armenia signed a Russian-brokered ceasefire with 
Azerbaijan to put an end to a 44-day war in which Armenian forces suffered a 
defeat in Nagorno-Karabakh, Gasparian claimed that on the fourth day of the war 
(September 30), during a Security Council meeting, he reported about Armenian 
casualties and presented an assessment of the situation in the armed forces.
He said then that he noted that “it is necessary to take measures to stop the 
war within the next two or three days, otherwise our resources will be exhausted 
in a short time and that with each day we will have more unfavorable conditions 
for the negotiation process.”
The secretary of the Security Council today repeated his recent public comment 
on that, saying that it was during the October 19 Security Council meeting that 
the statement about “resources being exhausted” was made and the idea of 
“stopping the war” within the next two or three days was expressed.
“By the way, leaders of the parliamentary opposition factions also attended that 
Security Council meeting,” Grigorian said.
Grigorian first addressed the matter in an interview with the Civilnet news 
website on March 12. But his statement was then taken with skepticism by 
representatives of the opposition that challenged its timing that coincided with 
the controversial dismissal of Gasparian as chief of the Armed Forces’ General 
Staff.
Gasparian was relieved of his duties after he and four dozen generals and 
high-ranking officers on February 25 called for Pashinian’s resignation, 
accusing him of putting Armenia “on the brink of collapse” following last year’s 
war in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Grigorian said today that the authorities addressed Gasparian’s November 17 
remarks “not when he demanded [Pashinian’s] resignation, but when he had been 
relieved of his duties.”
“There is a big difference. It is not that when he issued that statement, we 
said it in response. It’s been a long time before I talked about it,” the 
secretary of the Security Council said.
When asked about why the war was not stopped earlier, Grigorian reminded that 
there were at least three public efforts on that, apparently referring to three 
ceasefire agreements announced by Armenia and Azerbaijan after talks mediated 
separately by Russia, France and United States.
But Grigorian said that efforts to stop the war failed not because of the 
Armenian side, but because of the onslaught of Azerbaijan and active involvement 
of Turkey and jihadists.
“Stopping a war is not a unilateral action,” Grigorian added.
The secretary of the Security Council said that the government has no intention 
to put the whole blame for the defeat in the war on the army.
“We have no intention to shift the blame onto the Armed Forces. The Armed Forces 
should even prepare a report on the war and do it under the leadership of Onik 
Gasparian. If we wanted to put the blame on the Armed Forces, we would prepare 
that report ourselves,” Grigorian said.
Meanwhile, in another development it became known today that citing incorrect 
grounds, an administrative court in Yerevan had not accepted the lawsuit of the 
former chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces Gasparian against Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian and President Armen Sarkissian regarding his dismissal. 
Gasparian’s lawyer said the decision will be appealed at the Civil Court of 
Appeal.
Armenia Toughens Penalties For High Treason, Espionage
        • Artak Khulian
The opposition Prosperous Armenia faction in the Armenian parliament (archive 
photo).
Armenian lawmakers on Thursday unanimously adopted amendments to the penal code 
setting tougher penalties for high treason and espionage.
The bill brought to parliament by the opposition Prosperous Armenia Party (BHK) 
makes high treason a crime punishable by a life sentence or 15-20 years of 
imprisonment, with or without confiscation of property, and provides for 12-20 
years of imprisonment for espionage.
Under the currently applied articles of the Criminal Code high treason in 
Armenia is punishable by 10 to 15 years of imprisonment with or without 
confiscation of property, and espionage is punishable by 8 to 15 years of 
imprisonment.
Originally the BHK-drafted bill proposed only life imprisonment as a punishment 
for high treason.
The bill was adopted in the second and final reading with 112 votes. No member 
of the 132-seat parliament voted against it or abstained.
Armenian PM Denies Contradictions In Comments About Fighter Jets
        • Naira Nalbandian
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian being briefed on the technical 
capabilities of Su-30SM fighter jets inside one of them. (The photo was released 
by the prime minister’s press service on December 27, 2019)
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian sees no contradictions between his comments about 
why Armenia did not purchase missiles for Russian fighter jets to be able to use 
them in its recent war with Azerbaijan and his prewar post on social media about 
the multirole aircraft “successfully testing missiles.”
During his March 20 visit to Armenia’s Aragatsotn province, addressing a rally 
in one of the villages, Pashinian said that Yerevan purchased Russian Su-30SM 
fighters in May 2020, but did not manage to purchase missiles for them before 
the start of the 44-day war in Nagorno-Karabakh in September.
Meanwhile, it was still in December 2019 that the press service of the prime 
minister and the Ministry of Defense officially announced that the Armenian 
Armed Forces had been “equipped with Su-30SM multifunctional fighters.”
In July last year, Pashinian wrote on Facebook that the Su-30SMs “successfully 
tested missiles.”
Opposition members have accused the prime minister of lying to the public with 
“contradictory statements.”
Meanwhile, in his answer to a related question asked by a pro-government 
lawmaker in parliament on March 24, Pashinian denied any contradictions between 
his comments.
He explained that since “fighter aircraft are ultra-modern powerful weapons.., 
it is obvious that manufacturers of aircraft and missiles of different 
modifications are not the same entities.”
“In other words, they are not produced in one place, and, therefore, are not 
purchased in one place, but they are purchased from different entities. Su-30SM 
fighter jets arrived in Armenia in May 2020 and, yes, training flights were 
carried out, and missiles that were already in the arsenal of the Armenian Armed 
Forces were used. In a specific military situation decisions on their use or 
non-use were made in accordance with the extent to which the available 
ammunition allows these aircraft to fulfill the combat missions assigned to 
them. And what I said in the village of Ohanavan and what I said earlier did not 
contradict each other. Unfortunately, during the war we did not have time to 
purchase all those necessary accessories, missiles that would make it possible 
to use the ultra-modern Su-30SMs for their intended purpose and in accordance 
with their power,” Pashinian said.
Pashinian did not explain the discrepancy between the December 2019 press 
statement from his office showing photographs of him and then-Defense Minister 
David Tonoyan at an airfield watching demonstration flights of Su-30SM fighters 
and boarding the cockpit of one of the aircraft, and his statement that the 
Su-30SM fighter jets arrived in Armenia in May 2020.
Opposition Bright Armenia lawmaker Ani Samsonian seized upon that, accusing 
Pashinian of lying again.
“When will the government stop lying, manipulating and misleading the public?” 
she charged in her question to Pashinian.
The prime minister did not answer the opposition lawmaker’s question himself. 
Instead his deputy Tigran Avinian said: “A full answer on Su-30SM aircraft was 
given, there is nothing that I can add on that.”
Earlier this month Pashinian effectively retracted his claim that the Armenian 
army’s most advanced Russian-made Iskander missiles seriously malfunctioned 
during the recent war in Nagorno-Karabakh. The retraction came after a storm of 
criticism from Russian pro-government lawmakers and pundits, who accused the 
Armenian prime minister of incompetence and deceit.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 03/24/2021

                                        Wednesday, 
Armenian PM Calls For Changes To Electoral System Ahead Of Snap Polls
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian in parliament (archive photo)
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has spoken in favor of introducing 
“simple changes” in the country’s election-related laws before holding early 
parliamentary elections in June.
During a question-and-answer session in parliament on Wednesday the head of the 
Armenian government said that the primary change should concern the system of 
representation under which the next parliament will be elected.
According to the current laws, candidates are elected to parliament both on 
party lists and in individual races. The pro-Pashinian majority faction in 
parliament, My Step, suggests that the current system be replaced with an 
all-proportional ballot.
Pashinian said that holding early elections under the current or new electoral 
code was not part of the political agreement reached with the parliamentary 
opposition.
“But during all our discussions I asked our colleagues, including in parliament, 
about what they think about the voting system, in other words, whether they 
think that the rating system should remain or should be scrapped. During our 
discussions we registered that both the Prosperous Armenia party and the Bright 
Armenia party leave this matter to the discretion of the parliamentary 
majority,” Pashinian said.
“They [Prosperous Armenia and Bright Armenia] said they would not vote for the 
changes because they don’t want to share political responsibility with us, but 
they said that if we want to change it, they have no problem with it.”
The prime minister added that as a result of discussions with 
extra-parliamentary parties and representatives of civil society as well as 
taking into account the government’s earlier commitments My Step decided that 
simple changes to the electoral code are needed.
“So, the elections will be held under an all-proportional system, i.e. without a 
rating system,” Pashinian said.
In their recent public statements representatives of the Prosperous Armenia and 
Bright Armenia parties said they did not find it advisable that changes be made 
in the electoral code before the June 20 elections. They indicated, however, 
that their political parties will participate in the elections in any case.
In this regard Pashinian joked that “political agreements have nuances and 
sometimes the weather also influences them.” “But we will live up to our 
commitments,” he concluded.
Armenian Parliament Triples Penalties For Defamation, Insults
Armenian Deputy Parliament Speaker Alen Simonian (in the center), the author of 
the bill to raise the amount of damages ordered by courts in defamation and 
insult cases
The Armenian parliament has adopted amendments to the Civil Code dramatically 
raising the maximum penalties for defamation and insult offenses -- a move that 
local media organizations said would “significantly damage” freedom of speech 
and expression.
A total of 76 lawmakers on March 24 voted in the second and final reading in 
favor of the bill setting the damages for defamation at up to 6 million drams 
($11,400), and for insults at up to 3 million drams.
Forty members of the National Assembly voted against the changes authored by 
Deputy Parliament Speaker Alen Simonian, with three abstentions.
Earlier, the damages for defamation and insult offenses were set at up to 2 
million and 1 million drams, respectively.
The amendments passed in the first reading set higher punishments -- up to 10 
million drams -- but they were lowered at the suggestion of the government of 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian.
A number of media organizations in Armenia have called on President Armen 
Sarkisian not to sign the adopted bill into law, and send it to the 
Constitutional Court to check its constitutionality.
“This change is extremely dangerous, especially if we take into account the 
tendency of government officials, politicians, other public figures to perceive 
even objective criticism as insult and slander and take the matter to court,” 
the organizations said in a joint statement.
Armenia decriminalized defamation and insults in 2010 following an appeal of the 
Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly to member states.
Also on March 24, the National Assembly adopted in the second and final reading 
a package of amendments to the Law On Higher Education and Science.
Among other things, the amendments envisage that five out of nine members of 
universities’ boards will be appointed by the Education Ministry, a proposal 
that has raised concerns among universities that this may be a way for the 
government to reduce their autonomy.
The package was passed by 79 votes to 36, with two abstentions.
Parliament Elects New Court Of Cassation Judge
        • Artak Khulian
The Armenian Parliament building in Yerevan
The Armenian parliament on Wednesday elected Arsen Mkrtchian judge of the Civil 
and Administrative Chamber of the Court of Cassation.
Out of 132 lawmakers, 102 took part in the secret ballot; four ballots were 
declared invalid.
A total of 87 lawmakers voted for Mkrtchian, 11 for his rival Armen Haykiants.
The two candidates competed for the vacant position of a judge in the second 
round of voting after receiving the highest number of votes in the first round 
in which three candidates nominated by the Supreme Judicial Council participated.
On March 4, the Parliament failed to elect a new judge of the Court of Cassation 
after the majority My Step boycotted the voting, thus expressing its attitude 
towards the chairman of the Supreme Justice Council, Ruben Vardazarian, whom it 
accused of making a political statement.
Vardazarian denied that his appeal to judges on November 15 contained any 
political message.
Armenia To Have New Anti-Corruption Body
The Special Investigative Service is due to be abolished in Armenia after a new 
anti-corruption body is formed later in 2021
The Armenian parliament on Wednesday approved a government-drafted bill to set 
up a new anti-corruption body.
The vote on the draft legislation in the second and final reading went 80 to 38, 
with 2 abstentions in its favor.
Under the bill, Armenia will have a new body called “Anti-Corruption Committee” 
tasked with investigating corruption cases.
The body is expected to be formed and start operating in the second half of 
2021, after which the currently operating Special Investigative Service (SIS) 
will be abolished.
Presenting the bill on the Anti-Corruption Committee last December Armenia’s 
Justice Ministry said that the new body will inherit most of its powers from 
anti-corruption divisions of four Armenian law-enforcement agencies, including 
the SIS, that have long prosecuted corruption-related crimes.
Mariam Galstian, a senior official at ministry, expressed confidence then that 
the Anti-Corruption Committee will be in a much better position to combat 
bribery and other corrupt practices.
Armenian Parliament Votes To End Martial Law
The Armenian parliament in session (archive photo)
The Armenian parliament on Wednesday voted overwhelmingly to lift martial law 
that was declared in the country at the beginning of a war with Azerbaijan in 
Nagorno-Karabakh in late September.
A relevant bill presented by the opposition Prosperous Armenia and Bright 
Armenia factions was supported by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s majority 
alliance.
The vote taken in parliament went 118 to 1 in favor of the bill, with one 
lawmaker abstaining from voting.
Pashinian signed a trilateral statement with the presidents of Azerbaijan and 
Russia on November 9 to put an end to six-week hostilities on November 9, but 
the martial law regime was maintained in Armenia that got hundreds of kilometers 
of new borders with Azerbaijan as a result of the defeat suffered by Armenian 
forces in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Yerevan refused to lift martial law even after Baku did so in December, but it 
still removed some restrictions affecting freedom of speech and assembly as well 
as international travel.
The two opposition factions in the Armenian parliament twice sought to have 
martial law abolished, but their initiatives were thwarted by the parliament 
majority represented by the Pashinian-led My Step bloc.
Prosperous Armenia and Bright Armenia, as well as extra-parliamentary parties 
and groups have accused the government of maintaining martial law for political 
reasons. In particular, they have claimed that the prime minister needs martial 
law to prevent the opposition from impeaching him over mishandling the war. The 
government has rejected the accusations as groundless.
This time around, however, My Step indicated that it would not oppose the 
opposition’s move to abolish martial law.
It also explained it by the consensus achieved by the parliament’s majority and 
minority factions about the need to hold early elections soon, which will 
require abolishing martial law first.
Prime Minister Pashinian said last week that early parliamentary elections in 
Armenia will be held on June 20.
Parliament Speaker Ararat Mirzoyan, who represents My Step, said on Tuesday that 
it would be better if the government had initiated the bill, but still called on 
the parliament majority to vote in favor of lifting martial law “out of 
solidarity” with the opposition.
“This is at least a way to resolve the situation, restore political stability in 
one way or another. Taking into account all these factors, I suggest granting 
the initiative of the parliamentary opposition and voting for this bill to 
abolish martial law perhaps five or seven days earlier than it would make 
sense,” Mirzoyan said.
Under Armenia’s law, the parliament speaker signs and publishes a bill on 
abolishing martial law immediately after its passage.
Armenia Sees Hospital Bed Shortage Amid ‘Third Wave’ Of Coronavirus
        • Narine Ghalechian
A COVID-19 patient and a medic at the intensive care unit of Surp Grigor 
Lusavorich Hospital in Yerevan, Armenia (archive photo)
Intensive care units are full and dozens of patients with coronavirus symptoms 
have to wait for their turn to be hospitalized in Armenia as the South Caucasus 
country is experiencing another surge in COVID-19 cases, according to healthcare 
officials.
The Health Ministry said on March 23 that 24 people had died from COVID-19 
within the previous 24 hours, while the number of new coronavirus cases was over 
800.
This is the same or even higher rate that Armenia had in the fall when the 
so-called second wave of the pandemic was observed globally.
According to official data, over 185,000 people have been infected with the 
coronavirus in Armenia since the start of the pandemic, with nearly 3,400 
related deaths.
The number of current active cases is nearly 12,000.
Last week, Armenian Health Minister Anahit Avanesian said that more hospital 
beds were being deployed to cope with the latest surge in COVID-19 cases that 
many local experts call a “third wave” of coronavirus infections.
According to the ministry, the number of hospitals treating COVID-19 patients 
has been nearly doubled in recent days. Today a total of 19 hospitals take care 
for COVID-19 patients in Yerevan, Gyumri, Martuni, Spitak and Kapan.
Knar Ghonian, head of the Health Ministry’s Medical Aid Policy Department, said 
that currently almost all beds at intensive care units are occupied. “We have 
730 [COVID-19] patients who are in serious condition and 165 patients who are in 
critical condition today, with 60 of them breathing through oxygen devices,” 
Ghonian said.
According to the official, “we are back to a situation when patients have to 
wait for hospitalization at home.”
“Out of 270 patients needing hospitalization that were registered by our triage 
center since yesterday, 22 still continued to wait for hospitalization as of 
[March 23] morning. About 10 of them were at home, while others were in 
hospitals not specialized in treating COVID-19 patients,” Ghonian added.
While healthcare experts voice concern about the current epidemiological 
situation in Armenia, former Minister of Health Arsen Torosian, who currently 
serves as chief of the prime minister’s staff, said earlier this week that the 
government is unlikely to introduce another lockdown.
The latest wave of infections in Armenia came amid a weeks-long political crisis 
during which supporters of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and the opposition 
have been holding large-scale rallies.
Torosian attended one of the recent pro-Pashinian rallies and was noticed not 
wearing a face mask.
“If I didn’t wear a mask even for a while, I apologize for that. I should have 
been in a mask. I accept the criticism and again call on everyone to wear masks 
regardless of circumstances,” Torosian said, talking to RFE/RL’s Armenian 
Service on Monday.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Sarkissian and Pashinyan discuss domestic situation, early elections

Save

Share

 17:04,

YEREVAN, MARCH 23, ARMENPRESS. President Armen Sarkissian held a meeting with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on March 23, the presidency said.

“The President and the Prime Minister discussed the situation in the country, the steps aimed at improving the domestic political atmosphere, addressed the holding of early elections of parliament. The implementation of necessary steps directed at the free and fair organization of elections was highlighted, including through the perfection of the Constitution and the legislative framework,” the presidency said in a news release.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Toivo Klaar: Important to continue humanitarian efforts and crucial work on recovery of bodies of missing in Nagorno-Karabakh

Panorama, Armenia

The EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia Toivo Klaar said he was encouraged to hear Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s leaderships’ willingness to work together with the European Union in addressing the multiple challenges following the 2020 large-scale hostilities. In a series of tweets Toivo Klaar summed up his recent trips to Armenia and Azerbaijan. 

“Important to continue humanitarian efforts and crucial work on recovery of bodies of missing, including from the 1990s, and for confidence-building measures such as prompt return of all detainees and cooperation on pressing needs, including to address the impact of mines,” the EU representative added. 

In another tweet Toivo Klaar pointed to the need to cease negative public rhetoric. “Planning to be back in the region soon to pursue consultations on how the European Union can be the most useful in assisting both Armenia and Azerbaijan in the context of current challenges,” said the Eu official. 

Hampig Sassounian to be granted parole

Public Radio of Armenia
March 11 2021

Asbarez – The office of California Governor Gavin Newsom informed the Armenian National Committee of America Western Region Wednesday that the Governor has decided to allow Hampig Sassounian’s release by waiving any further appeals of the court’s ruling which upheld the Parole Board’s decision to grant parole.

“We are truly grateful to Governor Newsom and his team for keeping the lines of communication open with us, for listening to our concerns, and for making the humanitarian decision to allow Hampig Sassounian’s parole to stand. We look forward to witnessing his long overdue release from prison,” stated ANCA-WR Chair Nora Hovsepian.

It is anticipated that Sassounian’s release will be processed in the coming days pending finalization of the necessary steps under law.

The Los Angeles County Superior Court on February 24 reversed a decision by Governor Newson who rejected the parole eligibility and application of Hampig Sassounian.

LA County Superior Court Judge William C. Ryan vacated Newsom’s decision to reject Sassounian’s parole and reinstated the California Parole Board’s decision to grant Sassounian parole.