Turkish press: ‘Erdoğan’s diplomacy makes Türkiye essential in int’l arena’

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan speaks during a televised address following a Cabinet meeting, in Ankara, Türkiye, Thursday, Aug. 19, 2021. (Turkish Presidency via AP)

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s diplomatic initiatives to settle international crises have made Türkiye an indispensable actor in the global political arena, a French daily reported Friday.

In an article on how Erdoğan’s diplomacy has placed Türkiye in a key position on the international stage, the French daily Le Figaro said: “This real diplomatic success reveals a very active, and above all a more peaceful Turkish foreign policy which has the sixth-largest network of embassies globally.”

It also noted that by not imposing any of the economic sanctions imposed by Ukraine’s allies, Erdoğan is positioning Türkiye as a “central platform between the West and Russia, particularly in terms of gas.”

Referring to Türkiye’s role in resolving issues that emerged due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, it said: “The Ukraine conflict has highlighted repositioning of Turkish foreign policy lauded in the East, West, and Arab world.”

On the president’s qualities as a leader, it said: “Today, Erdoğan presents himself as a peacemaker and a person who establishes a dialogue with everyone.”

The agreement on the resumption of Ukrainian grain exports was Türkiye’s success, the article noted.

The article also drew attention to Erdoğan being an exceptional leader who shakes hands with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Türkiye, the United Nations, Russia and Ukraine signed a deal last month to resume grain exports from Ukrainian Black Sea ports which were halted due to the Russia-Ukraine war, now in its sixth month.

A Joint Coordination Centre (JCC), with officials from the three countries and the U.N., has been set up in Istanbul to oversee the shipments.

Former French Ambassador Jean de Gliniasty, a senior research fellow at the think tank IRIS, also said Türkiye, while remaining a part of the Western bloc, also diversifies its alliances. The Turkish government is in constant dialogue even in cases against its own interests.

“It has achieved dominance through a balance of power it carries out. It’s now necessary and praised by all. Turkey has become a virtuoso of multipolarity,” Gliniasty said.

Dorothee Schmid, an expert on the Mediterranean and Türkiye at the French Institute of International Relations, said: “This new policy is based on an impressive economic, military, and diplomatic repositioning, better able to take on its responsibilities than in the past, and willing to play a less adventurous role as a mediator and peacemaker.”

Also, Igor Delanoe, the deputy head of the French-Russian Analytical Center Observo, noted that Erdoğan has the capacity to handle sensitive issues separately, unlike Europeans who rely entirely on the Ukraine crisis in their relations with Putin.

Touching on Türkiye’s normalization efforts with its neighbors and regional countries, it said Türkiye’s “total normalization diplomacy bore fruit.”

With Erdoğan’s initiative regarding the normalization process between Türkiye and Armenia, it said the two countries, with their mutual borders closed for nearly 30 years, have taken steps towards normalization in recent months.

“The embargo on Turkish products on the Armenian side has been lifted and special envoys were appointed for new dialogue,” it stressed.

Calling Türkiye’s efforts for normalization with Arab countries a success, it said Türkiye has become an indispensable and often flexible country regarding Iran, Libya, Syria and Ukraine.

Private conversation between Nikol Pashinyan and Irakli Garibashvili takes place at the Armenian-Georgian border

Save

Share

 17:18,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 19, ARMENPRESS. At the Bagratashen section of the Armenian-Georgian border, the Prime Ministers of Armenia and Georgia, Nikol Pashinyan and Irakli Garibashvili, had a private conversation.

The meeting took place within the framework of the launching ceremony of the Armenian-Georgian Friendship Bridge, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement. 

Nikol Pashinyan and Irakli Garibashvili attached importance to the launch of the bridge and emphasized its role in facilitating bilateral transport flows.

The Heads of Government of Armenia and Georgia noted that high-level intensive contacts testify to the dynamic development of Armenian-Georgian relations and the high level of political dialogue.

The interlocutors discussed issues of Armenia-Georgia cooperation, exchanged ideas on regional developments. Both sides reaffirmed their willingness to consistently deepen friendly ties and continue active dialogue.

Armenia: Geography as Geopolitical Kryptonite

Aug 17 2022


Armenia is a country still recuperating from the disastrous 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, a conflict that illustrated its precarious geopolitical position. Wedged between two hostile nations of Turkey and Azerbaijan, Yerevan has had little choice but to rely on the protection and vassalage of Russia.

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Armenia finds itself in an even more precarious situation. Facing potential new military aggression with Azerbaijan, growing normalization talks with Turkey, and a drift away from the Kremlin, Armenia finds itself in one of the most fraught geopolitical standoffs existing in the world today—and the wrong move against one of the three authoritative leaders of these countries could spell disaster.

Armenia has historically been used as a battleground between world powers due to its strategic location in the Caucasus. Between the Romans and Persians fighting over control of the country to the Arabs, Turks, and Russians—Armenians persisted and continued to survive endless conflicts and even a genocide. The country’s winds of change blew once again during the Bolshevik Revolution where the ‘Wilsonian Armenia’ idea died, and the Soviets annexed the country into the USSR. Ever since then, Armenia has found itself under the boot of the Kremlin.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, Armenia engaged in a years-long  war with Azerbaijan over the region known as Karabakh. The war saw several massacres on both sides and mass displacement of refugees, with the origins of the conflict tracing back to border manipulations created by Moscow. The region, which has had an Armenian majority for over a thousand years, was transferred to Azerbaijan by Josef Stalin, a Soviet dictator who was not averse to deporting millions of people out from their homelands to “conform” to the Soviet lifestyle.

Despite the early nineties war ending with a decisive Armenian victory, the region is still internationally recognized as Azerbaijan and the war created a refugee crisis that is still not resolved to this day.

After years of pro-Kremlin prime ministers, many of which were shrouded in controversy stemming from either corruption or negligence, the Armenian military and Artsakh Defense Forces were left in a hollowed-out state. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan quietly built up its own military following the disaster of the 1994 war. Ilham Aliyev, president of Azerbaijan since 2003, used his country’s oil wealth to his advantage, signing defense contracts with Turkey, Israel, and Russia—the same nation that promised to protect Armenia and incorporated it into the CTSO collective security framework, which effectively tied Armenia’s ongoing security to its willingness to appease the Kremlin.

In 2018, Armenians took to the streets to protest decades of corruption, deposing a leadership structure rife with oligarchs and other Kremlin-linked figures. This was known as the Velvet Revolution, which has created consequences felt to this day.

Under the administration of Nikol Pashinyan, there have been several OSCE Minsk Group conferences to press the issue of the peace process between Baku and Yerevan, only to quickly falter each time. Aliyev had continued to build up his military while the inexperienced Pashinyan focused more on corruption from past administrations rather than bolstering defenses for the inevitable war to come. The first major clashes took place between Pashinyan’s Armenia and Aliyev’s Azerbaijan in the Tavush region of Armenia in July 2020, lasting several days. A quick ceasefire was established, though in retrospect the fighting was likely a combat test for the wider clashes to come later in the year.

Using the most opportunistic time during the United Nations General Assembly, Azerbaijan launched a war against Armenia and the Artsakh Defense Forces in September 2020, an operation that actually changed the face of conventional warfare forever. Using the now-infamous Baykar Bayraktar TB2 advanced drone platform from Turkey, the Azerbaijani military hit Armenian logistical supply chains, convoys, and troops in open territory, resulting in stunning success on the battlefield and, subsequently, serious psychological blows as the footage was quickly disseminated across the Internet.

Armenia suffered from its reliance on Soviet-era military doctrines and weaponry that a conventional military could not manage against a more well-armed conventional force. Toward the end of the war, Armenia could have used its geography to embark on a war of attrition against Azerbaijan akin to the Taliban’s methods of holding out against NATO forces, but the country’s leader signaled for capitulation, giving way to an unpredictable future.

The capitulation of Armenia was met by a trilateral agreement between Yerevan and Baku, mediated by Moscow. Though Azerbaijan had won the war, many people have mused that Russia was the true winner. The Kremlin, which stayed idle most of the war, showed Armenia that it had to depend on Russia to survive, and expects complete loyalty from here on out. They also gained a near permanent foothold in the Karabakh region, solidifying Russia’s influence in the lower Caucasus.

The 2020 war was a hard lesson for Armenia—not only did it learn the error of its ways in not investing in defense after decades of stagnation and reliance on Soviet-era weaponry, but it also learned first-hand what would happen to states that broke ranks with Russia. Such lessons have also been learned by countries like Georgia, Belarus, and Ukraine, all of which have had to respond in various ways when their citizens pushed back against pervasive Russian influence.

The war also showed Western hypocrisy when it came to human rights violations, as numerous executions and instances of cultural destruction took place under the Azerbaijani military, allegedly under Ilham Aliyev’s orders. Contrary to the framework of the Geneva Conventions, Azerbaijan has also refused to release Armenian POWs and has held mock trials for them in kangaroo courts, akin to what Russia has done with POWs from the Ukrainian Azov regiment.

Now the trilateral agreement faces increasing uncertainty, and “Russian peacekeepers” are clearly not living up to their name. Numerous ceasefire violations have taken place, primarily faulted to Azerbaijan, and all with little enforcement of the peace deal by Russia.

Over the past year, Armenia has initiated a normalization process with Turkey. This has led to skepticism and division between Armenians and the diaspora, as the issue of genocide recognition from 1915 and the question of whether the Turkish government will keep Azerbaijan at bay loom large. Likewise, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan has cozied up to Russia over the past several years, establishing a joint military base with Moscow in the Karabakh region, purchasing S400s despite wide NATO condemnation, and giving Russian oligarchs a haven from sanctions in Turkey. This has also put Yerevan in a predicament, with fears that Moscow would leave the country to its fate in order to placate Erdogan’s authoritarian government, and in the process seed new conflicts in NATO at the expense of its own allies.

Against the backdrop of the Ukraine war, Putin solidified an alliance with Ilham Aliyev on February 24th, causing new concerns in Yerevan. Armenia has taken an extremely neutral approach thus far, though fake news rumors at one point put the country on the international radar when, early in the war, NATO officials visited Armenia on rumors that they had sent their fixed wing aircraft to reinforce Russia’s invasion – an allegation that was proven false. Armenia has also seen a mass influx of Russian citizens and oligarchs who are bent on circumventing sanctions, putting a strain on their already vulnerable economy.

As the European Union has looked to divest away from Russian gas, Azerbaijan took full advantage, setting a landmark deal with the EU to supply gas to the continent until 2027. This has come with skepticism as EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called Aliyev “trustworthy” on her official Twitter. By effectively placating one dictatorship for another, Armenia once again has received the short end of the stick. This was further reinforced when Aliyev emphasized Armenians in Karabakh would not have special status under Azerbaijani authority, dismissing any autonomy for them and fueling more mutual antagonism between both nations.

Armenia is now a centerpiece on a chessboard between Turkey, Russia, and Azerbaijan, and with few allies and minor strategic importance to the wider international community, any wrong move could spell another humanitarian disaster right under the nose of the United Nations.

 

The views expressed in this article belong to the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of Geopoliticalmonitor.com

https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/armenia-geography-as-geopolitical-kryptonite/

Aliyev warns Armenians not to test Azerbaijan’s patience

Mehr News Agency, Iran
Aug 13 2022

TEHRAN, Aug. 13 (MNA) – President of Azerbaijan stressed Baku’s right to conduct military operations in Karabakh similar to the one its armed forces conducted in early August along the Lachin corridor.

Armenian authorities in Karabakh said two Armenian soldiers were killed and 19 others were wounded in the August 3 attack by Azerbaijani forces that prompted calls from the international community for de-escalation in the volatile region.

Azerbaijani officials said that the country had taken retributive action for the killing of an Azerbaijani serviceman by Armenians.

In the interview to national television Aliyev said that hundreds of Armenian soldiers were withdrawn from Karabakh after Azerbaijan’s military operation on August 3. He stressed that Azerbaijan wants a full withdrawal of Armenian armed units from Karabakh. “It is Armenia’s commitment. It is reflected in the act of surrender signed by Armenia on November 10, 2020.”

“Armenians living in Karabakh should take the right steps. They must understand that their future depends on their integration into Azerbaijani society. We live in reality. From the geographical, economic, and historical points of view Karabakh is an inseparable part of Azerbaijan,” the Azeri president told AzTV.

“Because the Armenians living in Karabakh will not have any status, independence, or advantages. They will live like all citizens of Azerbaijan. Their rights will be protected the way the rights of Azerbaijani citizens and peoples living [in Azerbaijan] are protected,” Aliyev said.

Speaking at a weekly cabinet meeting in Yerevan on August 4, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian stressed that there was no serviceman of the Republic of Armenia in the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh region.

There are about 2,000 Russian peacekeepers are in the region.

In his interview Aliyev also confirmed that the few remaining Armenian residents of the town of Lachin and the villages of Sus and Zabux (Aghavno) situated along the Lachin corridor will leave by the end of the month as a new route for the corridor linking Karabakh with Armenia is due to be put into use.

He said that under the Geneva conventions Armenian resettlers who lived in the villages after their occupation by ethnic Armenian forces in the early 1990s did so illegally and, therefore, he warned, those of them who will choose to stay might, in fact, be treated like war criminals.

MP/PR

Artsakh official: Cultural monuments’ removal from Berdzor, Aghavno, Sus will be completed next week

NEWS.am
Armenia – Aug 13 2022

The removal of Armenian cultural monuments from Berdzor, Aghavno, and Sus settlements, which will be handed over to Azerbaijan’s control on August 25, will be completed in the next week. Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) Deputy Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports Lernik Hovhannisyan informed Armenian News-NEWS.am about this.

“According to the civil defense plan, when the decision was made that the population [in the aforesaid settlements] should be evacuated, naturally the monuments as well the book fund—the libraries, the museum exhibits—[also] had to be removed,” Hovhannisyan said, in particular.

According to the deputy minister, the Armenian monuments and cross-stones in the aforementioned communities have been moved to the Artsakh capital Stepanakert, there is already an agreement with the Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church that some of them will be placed in the park being built near the St. Hovhannes (John) Church in Stepanakert, and the others—in the area adjacent to the St. Hakob (Jacob) Church.

“There is a proposal to place them in the park of the newly constructed building of the Artsakh State University. There are other proposals that we will consider after moving them all,” Hovhannisyan added.

Reflecting on the fact that Azerbaijan has already announced the plan of turning the Holy Ascension Church in Berdzor town into a mosque, Lernik Hovhannisyan noted that they have repeatedly appealed in this regard to international organizations, but the latter’s respective responses are only statements.

“We don’t see concrete practical steps—except for words. And as for the Holy Ascension Church in Berdzor and the Church of the Holy Martyrs in Aghavno [village], materials about their future fate are already circulating in the Azerbaijani media. And specifically, the project of turning the Holy Ascension Church of Berdzor into a mosque was chosen by a non-governmental organization, which I do not rule out will become the official policy of Azerbaijan,” said Hovhannisyan.

Artsakh Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Hayk Khanumyan had informed the Armenian residents of Aghavno and Berdzor that they had to leave their homes by August 25.

Armenpress: German MEP draws Borrell’s attention to the un-constructive behavior of Azerbaijan

German MEP draws Borrell’s attention to the un-constructive behavior of Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 21:10, 9 August 2022

YEREVAN, AUGUST 9, ARMENPRESS. Member of the European Parliament representing Germany, permanent member of the Subcommittee on Security and Defence, Lars Patrick Berg, addressed a question to EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell regarding the escalation of the situation in Nagorno Karabakh. ARMENPRESS reports, citing European Neighbourhood Monitor, a number of other MEPs joint the question.

“While the world’s attention is on Russia’s criminal invasion of Ukraine, the situation in Nagorno‑Karabakh is deteriorating.

Azerbaijani troops attacked the village of Parukh on 24 March 2022 and violated the ceasefire on 28 May 2022, fatally wounding one Armenian soldier.

This happened one day after a crude statement from Azerbaijan’s President, Ilham Aliyev, who depicted the use of force as an attempt to enforce international law, claiming that the Nagorno‑Karabakh conflict has been completely solved, making demands over the sovereign territory of Armenia and using harsh words, saying that ‘the Nazis in Armenia’ ‘should sit down and not look our way if they do not want their heads to be crushed again’.

These actions and statements openly go against the provisions of the ceasefire agreement of November 2020, as well as the spirit of the statement made after the trilateral meeting between Armenia, Azerbaijan and the EU in Brussels on 22 May 2022.

We would therefore like to ask the Vice‑President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy what concrete steps the European External Action Service is taking to prevent a recrudescence of the hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh and to continue a constructive dialogue between the parties”, reads the question.

In response, Josep Borrell said that the EU is deeply concerned by the recent incidents between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the possibility of further escalation. The Commission regrets the loss of life.

“The EU takes a positive approach to the continuation of the trilateral talks led by the President of the European Council with the Armenian Prime Minister and the Azerbaijani President. These efforts have already produced numerous results, but a peace process is never without difficulties. The EU’s goal remains to contribute to a comprehensive agreement for lasting peace and security in the region.

The High Representative/Vice President has been in regular contact with Armenia and Azerbaijan since the outbreak of hostilities. The EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the Conflict in Georgia has been involved in the preparation of the trilateral meetings and has followed up on the ground on the implementation of the agreements reached between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, most recently in early June 2022. On May 31, 2022, the Spokesperson for the President of the European Council issued a statement reiterating the need for a fair and balanced negotiation process and the need to prepare the population for peace. The President of the European Council also addressed both heads of state and government in early July 2022 regarding the recent sharp statements that are not conducive to the nature and spirit of the talks and expressed the EU’s readiness to convene the next round of trilateral talks in Brussels”, reads the answer of EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell.

Azerbaijani forces destroy dozens of Armenian vehicles in precise strike

Defence Blog
Aug 4 2022
NEWSARMYVIDEO

The Azerbaijani Armed Forces releases footage on Wednesday showing what it said were successful strikes against Armenian forces using the Turkish-made Bakar Bayraktar TB2 armed drones.

According to a press release from the Ministry Of Defense Of Azerbaijan, illegal Armenian armed formations in the territory of Azerbaijan, where the Russian peacekeeping contingent is temporarily deployed, grossly violated the provisions of the Statement of November 10, 2020, and committed a terrorist and sabotage act against the Azerbaijan Army Units on August 3.

“Members of illegal Armenian armed detachments attempted to seize the Girkhgiz high ground, located on a mountain range covering the territory of the Kalbajar and Lachin regions, and establish new combat positions there,” the news release says.

The Azerbaijani military carried out a “Revenge” retaliatory operation in response, killing and wounding an unspecified number of “illegal Armenian militants.”

The official press release also states that as a result of the “Revenge” retaliatory operation conducted by the Azerbaijan Army Units, the Girkhgiz high ground, including Saribaba and several advantageous high grounds along the Karabakh range of the Lesser Caucasus Mountains were taken under control. Currently, Azerbaijan Army Units are carrying out engineering work on the establishment of new positions and laying supply roads on advantageous frontiers.

Relations between the former Soviet republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, also known as Upper Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

Their most recent clashes were in September 2020, during which Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages that were occupied by Armenia for nearly three decades.

Watch the video at the link below:

Residents of Berdzor block road to Lachin corridor

NEWS.am
Armenia – Aug 5 2022

Residents of Berdzor blocked the road to the Lachin corridor, demanding not to surrender Berdzor and to give them clear guarantees.

They expressed their desire to talk to the head of the Russian peacekeepers. The police are obstructing the protest.

The townspeople say they were given until August 25 to leave the town, because on that day the corridor will be surrendered to Azerbaijan.

To recall, Armenian Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Gnel Sanosyan said that construction work on the alternative road section has already begun and will be completed by spring.

The Third Aftershock and Nuclear Iran – a fictional scenario

Aug 6 2022
By David Davidian
The following fictional Red Cell scenario is intended to stimulate alternative thinking and challenge conventional wisdom, tying together events in operational fiction with national realities
The smartphone earthquake tracker app reported an event slightly higher than a three on the Richter Scale, occurring someplace south of Iran’s Caspian shoreline. There were no reports of injury or property loss. Aftershocks followed this earthquake. Such are regular occurrences across the many seismic faults that crisscross the Lesser Caucasus Mountain range; a confluence of the Arabian Plate and Iranian Block pushing away the Anatolian Block and Russian Platform at the Greater, or otherwise known as the Northern Caucasus. An unprecedented event was occurring with reverberations lasting long after this apparently minor seismic event.
Active tectonics north of the Arabian plate (Avagyan et al. 2005)
Armenia’s National Security Service (NSS) highest security class, the Black Level, demonstrated its prowess in ushering in Armenia’s Samson Option, providing Armenia with an “if you killed me, you would die a worse death” deterrent. With this benign smartphone earthquake alert, NSS’s Black Level will face a new, unprecedented challenge that began ironically.
Three weeks earlier, a delegation with members of Armenia’s new, crack diplomatic corps, intelligence, and counter-intelligence personnel, met with a group of Iranian Revolutionary Guard (IRG) technologists. The meeting was a typical post-Armenia II conference. Armenia’s national reorganization was proceeding reasonably well after the adoption of competing Grand Strategies was imposed upon existing Armenian ruling structures. The ability to enact an Armenian Samson Option was much more than a coup d’état, for it cowed even the most arrogant Armenian oligarch into submission. Armenia ceased to be the constant victim of big-power politics. Not only has the world changed after Russia dismantled Ukraine’s Bandarists, forcing the occupation of about three quarters of Ukraine, having left much of Galicia and Lvov under Polish protection, but Russia was in no mood to play games with wounded globalists in whatever form. With Iran, Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia now members of BRICS, the world once again is, at least, bifurcated. Russia and Iran have engaged in vigorous diplomacy, much to the dismay of those hoping to dismantle Iran’s nuclear and military programs. Last year’s reports claim the inevitability of Iran going nuclear. Recently, Iran quietly requested Russian help securing its northern borders from covert operations against Iranian interests. In 2015, Russia took almost 11,000 kg of Iran’s enriched uranium as part of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal with Iran.
In the meeting with IRG technologists, the Armenians understood that a breakthrough had been achieved associated with the Iranian nuclear program. They were also told that certain regional powers had planned a series of false-flag operations in Iran, referring to the culprits as those speaking different language families than us. This was a rather crude way of saying Semitic and Altaic in such an official setting. However, it was clear from the term “breakthrough” that Iran was signaling it was able to announce it had nuclear weapons. In addition, the IRG stated Iran appeared to be in a race. It was unclear what the race was. It probably was not in reference to a regional nuclear arms race, but instead was referring to the effects of the false-flag operations. True, some of the stolen spent fuel from Armenia’s Metsamor nuclear power station ended up in Iraqi Kurdistan. Still, the Kurds could not do much with this spent fuel and were not in competition with Iran. It remained for Armenian diplomats and intelligence officers to decipher. Claims of false-flag operations are made on a weekly basis by Iran. However, Azerbaijani and Turkish agents were imprisoned in Iran after the “Speak your mother tongue” operation ended. Armenian intelligence had to wait for changes in the situational status, although signals and human intelligence data were streaming in. Armenian intelligence knew, for sure, that international intelligence services must have tried to infiltrate this IRG meeting even though it took place deep underground, someplace north of Tehran, with participants heavily vetted. Yet, there was no reaction by any intelligence-controlled mainstream media.
Armenian intelligence knew from Russian technical experts who participated in the joint Russian-Iranian Persepolis program there was a decade-long debate within Iran’s nuclear weapons community. The debate was over whether computer simulations of nuclear weapon designs were good enough or whether live tests were required. Live tests or simulations really weren’t the issue because the computer codes were more than accurate if the weapons were designed to specifications. Instead, the debate was whether an announcement of nuclear capability was ever enough or a demonstration was too much. The joke among these scientists was, unfortunately, it could not be halfway between these extremes. Time would tell.
The earthquake alert was immediately followed by a highly encrypted text message directing specific Black Level agents to meet in pre-specified locations across Armenia. It was announced that weeks earlier Armenian seismic experts had provided Iran with exhaustive analysis of the 1988 Spitak Earthquake. The request was considered odd, for Iran must have had credible information about that earthquake, furthermore it was not directly associated with fault lines in Iran. It appeared as if Iran was looking for people who may have worked on Soviet tectonic weapons.
Armenian technical intelligence concluded with well over ninety percent confidence that something very odd occurred as part of this 3.2 magnitude earthquake. While the original earthquake was not under question, a third 2.2 magnitude aftershock appeared bizarre unless there was an unknown fault formation associated with the Iranian Block or this was an extraordinary seismic event. The Armenian seismologists stated that while the initial earthquake and second aftershock generally were well within the expected patterns, the third aftershock appeared abnormal. Even worse, the subsequent aftershocks seemed to be as expected. The seismologists described the two categories of waves created during earthquakes. P or compressional waves are the vibration of the rock in the direction of propagation. P waves travel fastest and are the first to arrive from the earthquake. The others are S or shear waves, where rock oscillates perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation. Earthquakes strongly excite the transverse motions of S waves, producing a distinct radiation pattern, typically weak P waves and strong S waves. Explosions, however, have strong P waves and weak S waves. One way to determine the difference between natural earthquakes and explosions is the ratio of P-wave to S-wave energy measured from the seismographs. Explosions have higher P to S ratios than earthquakes. The third aftershock had a very high P to S ratio, meaning even though it appeared at first to be the third aftershock of a mild earthquake, it either was a new type of seismic phenomenon or a massive explosion, some 4km deep, fifty-five minutes after the initial earthquake.
Given that the IRG told Armenians, cryptically, they had a breakthrough in their weapons program, and a nuclear detonation could fully explain the third aftershock, the Armenians were rapidly reaching an actionable conclusion. Only a handful of individuals in the Armenian security infrastructure knew that Iranian military intelligence had contacted what remained of the old Soviet KGB in Armenia, inquiring if they knew anybody who may have worked on a rumored Soviet tectonic weapon. The Iranians were not interested in creating such a weapon but in obtaining any abandoned documents or other related research that may exist. The Iranians worked with a team from the NSS’s Black Level in this effort. During the early 1990s, those able to purchase privatization rights to major research facilities in Armenia eventually sold their contents to the Iranians based on weight without bothering to ascertain their actual worth to the new Armenian state. The Iranians went through everything they purchased and found trace documents on tectonic weapons research. There were only two people in Armenia who had information on this program. One worked in a Soviet research laboratory engaged in general earthquake research, and the other in a Soviet military laboratory in the Tian Shan mountains, near the Kyrgyz-Kazakh border. The first person stated a laboratory existed in Abkhazia, but it was a seismic listening post, although he didn’t work there. He still had some now declassified documents on earthquake research. The second scientist worked in the Tian Shan military laboratory and engaged in directed energy and magnetic hydrodynamic systems; the former pumping energy into the atmosphere, the latter into the earth’s surface.
When it became clear what had transpired in Iran, Armenian Prime Minister Chalabyan met within two hours of the third aftershock in an undisclosed location with the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ali Khamenei. Khamenei told Chalabyan, 
“Indeed, Iran had drilled nine different shafts, each almost 4km deep at different locations along active major and minor fault lines just south of the Caspian Sea. We placed medium yield atomic bombs, approximately equivalent to ten kilotons of TNT, dialed into each device and waited for almost a month and a half for a minor earthquake to occur, allowing us to synthesize what appeared to be an aftershock. We have received inquiries from Azerbaijani, Japanese, and Italian seismic stations for further information. We have held them off but cannot do so forever.” 
Chalabyan asked, “Why are you telling me this?” Khamenei said, “Armenia will announce to the world that Iran has detonated their first nuclear device.” Khamenei continued, “We also know that even though Moscow and our Foreign Ministry have warned Azerbaijan to cease its covert operations in Iran, they are increasing. Baku believes if Iran begins to falter, they can capture land in Iran’s northwest. The third aftershock will take less than a day for its universal acceptance as a man-made event. With the world on edge, we would like your permission to station Armenian-speaking Iranian soldiers along the existing Armenian-Azerbaijani-Turkish borders. We will have our regular soldiers on our common border. We have already discussed this with Russian President Putin.” Chalabyan was speechless but held his own, knowing that the Southern Caucasus would be forever a region transformed. 
As the Iranian Supreme Leader exited gracefully, Chalabyan sat in his chair staring at the floor. Simultaneous thoughts were circling his mind. He thought about what the previous incompetent Armenian government would have done, if anything, in this situation. Was Armenia’s role in this announcement only to send the strongest message to Azerbaijan and Turkey, and if not, what must Armenia do on the international stage? Wait, wait, Armenia has nuclear power as a friendly neighbor! How does Armenia address the devastating Turkish and Azerbaijani reactions? Has Iran supplanted Russia in the Caucasus, are they partners, and if so, to what relative degree? Will this historic opportunity be used against Armenia? How might Armenia use all to cement a geopolitical footprint? Most importantly, it struck him that the new dynamic diplomatic corps would have its work cut out as soon as he returned to the capital, Yerevan. 
As the mainstream media continued to flood websites with their well-crafted disinformation, the Armenian Foreign Ministry posted a simple announcement, heard around the world, in three languages.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has detonated a nuclear device.
The Islamic Republic of Iran Detonated a Nuclear Device.
The Islamic Republic of Iran detonated a nuclear device.
Within minutes, Iranian and Armenian Foreign Ministries were coordinating messaging with Armenia “graciously” conferring with states having no or poor relations with Iran. Chalabyan’s cell phone rang – it was the Georgian Foreign Ministry.
As Armenia’s Foreign Ministry web server was crashing due to thousands of requests per second, Turkish and Azerbaijani leaders were in multiple discussions on many levels. They both were confronting the end of Erdogan’s neo-Ottoman designs. The “One nation, two states” claim of Turkey and Azerbaijan was disintegrating by the second. Turkey’s role as NATO’s attack dog with sights on Russia and Iran was dashed. With foreign reserves draining and subsequently frozen were decimating the Turkish economy. Turkey pulled all its armed forces out of Azerbaijan as civil strife exploded across Turkey. With their wealth in foreign shell companies, Azerbaijani oligarchs were fleeing Baku by the plane loads.
Iran confirmed Armenia’s announcement. As a state with centuries of experience in international diplomacy, Iran unambiguously stated it would never use its nuclear weapons on a first-strike basis against any country.
Yerevan, Armenia
Author: David Davidian (Lecturer at the American University of Armenia. He has spent over a decade in technical intelligence analysis at major high technology firms. He resides in Yerevan, Armenia).

Azerbaijan’s provocations part of its ethnic cleansing policy in Artsakh – Prosecutor’s Office

Panorama
Armenia – Aug 2 2022

The provocative actions carried out by the Azerbaijani military in the northern and northwestern parts of the Artsakh Republic are part of its policy of Armenophobia and ethnic cleansing, the Artsakh Prosecutor’s Office said in a statement on Tuesday.

The law enforcement agency urges the people to refrain from spreading untrue or unverified information about the situation on the line of contact.

It underscores that amid constant tensions the Artsakh government agencies are trying to organize healthcare, education, social security and urban development, while “excessive tension not only paralyzes these processes, but also artificially creates an additional burden for them.”