Dimitrij Rupel: We Urge Azerbaijan To Stop Warlike Rhetoric

DIMITRIJ RUPEL: WE URGE AZERBAIJAN TO STOP WARLIKE RHETORIC

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.02.2008 15:36 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Union stands against resolution of
conflicts by the use of force, Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij
Rupel told a news conference in Yerevan.

"The EU speaks out for building an atmosphere of trust between the
parties to conflict. For this purpose, the mandate of EU Envoy for the
South Caucasus, Mr Peter Semneby, was expanded. We call on Azerbaijan
to put an end to warlike statements. The Nagorno Karabakh problem
needs political will but not weapons," he said.

Touching upon Nagrono Karabakh’s participation in the negotiations,
Mr Rupel said, "The OSCE Minsk Group format doesn’t provide for
participation of Nagorno Karabakh in talks yet."

Cooperation With Russia Contributes To Regional Peace, Stability And

COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA CONTRIBUTES TO REGIONAL PEACE, STABILITY AND DEVELOPMENT

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.02.2008 15:56 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ RA National Assembly Speaker Tigran Torosian met
with Russian Prime Minister Victor Zubkov.

Assessing highly the Armenian-Russian cooperation, Mr Torosian said,
"Relations with Russia are very important. South Caucasus is a region
experiencing political and economic problems. It’s the region of
conflicts. Time has proved that cooperation with Russia contributes
to peace, stability and development of the region. Forthcoming
presidential elections in both states will offer new opportunities
for efficient cooperation."

For his part, Mr Zubkov said he discussed commodity turnover, energy
cooperation, railway communication and some other issues with the
President and Prime Minister of Armenia.

"I am impressed with Armenia’s economic growth," he said stressing
the importance of interparliamentary cooperation between Armenia and
Russia, the RA NA press office reported.

TBILISI: Armenian Businesses Unhappy With Ferry Routes

ARMENIAN BUSINESSES UNHAPPY WITH FERRY ROUTES
By M. Alkhazashvili
(Translated by Diana Dundua)

The Messenger, Georgia
Feb 7 2008

Arsen Kazaryan, chair of Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs
of Armenia, recently said that the new Kavkaz-Poti ferry route has
failed to offer real competition to Armenia’s other major Black Sea
connection to Russia, the Ukrainian-run Ilichevsk-Poti ferry route.

He said the Kavkaz-Poti ferry route, which opened last year, is
transiting low levels of cargo at relatively high tariffs, adding
that with its current capacity at 40-45 shipping containers, it is
not able to properly compete with the Ilichevsk-Poti service which
has a capacity of 108 containers.

Meanwhile, the Ukrainian ferry company that operates the Ilichevsk-Poti
route is considering a new connection with the Russian port of
Novorosiisk, according to Ukrferry commercial director Vladimir
Chernievski, who yesterday finished a three-day visit to Armenia to
meet government officials and businessmen.

Russian Gifts To Armenia: Sea, Atom, And Olympic Games

RUSSIAN GIFTS TO ARMENIA: SEA, ATOM, AND OLYMPIC GAMES
by Pyotr Netreba
Translated by Aleksei Ignatkin

What the Papers Say Part A (Russia)
Kommersant
February 7, 2008 Thursday

Backed By Russia, Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisjan Will Certainly Become
The Next President Of Armenia

Victor Zubkov flew to Yerevan on the eve of the presidential election
in Armenia slated for February 19. The visit began with a meeting
with Serzh Sarkisjan, Zubkov’s opposite number and candidate for
president. The Russian delegation is stone-cold confident that
Sarkisjan will win the election. "Continuity of the current trends in
the Russian-Armenian relations should be assured," a Russian official
was quoted as saying.

Armenian diaspora in Russia numbers nearly 2 million. Private
transactions from Russia to Armenia annually amount to $1 billion
– equalling sum total of Russian investments in Armenian economy
throughout years of cooperation. Russian capitals control nearly
all major economic objects in Armenia and objects of the financial
infrastructure, transportation, and communications. Inter RAO EES for
example runs the Sevan-Razdan Hydropower Project and Razdan Thermal
Power Plant, Gazprom manages ArmGazprom, and Russian Railroads took
over their Armenian analog barely a year ago.

Zubkov did his bit for the Russian expansion into Armenia, yesterday.

Sergei Kirienko of Rosatom accompanying Zubkov said the negotiations
were mostly centered around construction of a new nuclear power plant
in Armenia in 2010-2011 (the one Armenia has these days is old, to
be shut down in 2011). According to Kirienko, Russia’s chances of
winning the forthcoming international contest are fine. In any event,
the future nuclear power plant in Armenia will never find itself
short of fuel. A memorandum was signed on the Russian-Armenian joint
venture for geologic exploration and uranium mining in Armenia.

Russia and Armenia will have equal shares (50%) in the new outfit.

Kirienko recalled the first Russian expeditions to Armenia in 2007
that estimated uranium resources there at about 30,000 tons.

Transportation Minister Igor Levitin came up with a new idea of
including Armenia, a country without access to the sea, in the
would-be Black Sea Ring route. The project promoted by Russia
stipulates regular ferry runs after 2010-2011 between Varna in
Bulgaria, Kavkaz in Russia, Ilyichevsk in Ukraine, Poti in Georgia,
and Istanbul in Turkey. Armenia was advised to organize cargo traffic
via Poti (something the Georgians will have to be talked into yet).

Levitin in the meantime did not think that problematic relations
between Russia and Georgia would spell trouble for Armenia’s
participation in the project.

Along with everything else, Zubkov praised Armenian-made cement and
said it would probably be used in construction in Sochi where objects
for the future Olympic Games were already being built.

Sarkisjan kept saying in the meantime that no matter how important
solution to transport and other problems was, cordial relations with
Russia took precedence over everything else. "Being friends with
Russia benefits Armenia, and Russian capitals feel comfortable here
in Armenia," he said.

United Opposition Or ‘Western Bloc’?

UNITED OPPOSITION OR ‘WESTERN BLOC’?
by Armen Tsaturyan

Hayots Ashkharh, Armenia
Feb 5 2008

Ex-President Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s statement in [third town of]
Vanadzor on 1 February that [Orinats Yerkir party leader and
presidential candidate] Artur Baghdasaryan and Heritage party leader
Raffi Hovhannisyan may support [Ter-Petrosyan] in the near future is
one of the options for the Armenian opposition to unite ahead of the
19 February polls.

Reacting to Ter-Petrosyan’s prediction, the leader of the Orinats
Yerkir party has said, in turn, that he is not ruling out anything
at this point "both in terms of him [Ter-Petrosyan] joining me and me
joining him" because, as Baghdasaryan said, "negotiations with Levon
Ter-Petrosyan and Raffi Hovhannisyan, and who joins who and at which
phase would be known after the negotiations".

The Orinats Yerkir party is trying to set up a united office to
monitor the election fraud, and a number of forces, including
the Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun [ARFD] and
[National Democratic Union leader and presidential candidate] Vazgen
Manukyan’s representatives, have said they might support the idea.

Political analysts also discuss the possibility of an alliance between
the Orinats Yerkir party, the ARFD, Manukyan and the Heritage party.

We think that the results of recent opinion polls conducted by
various companies (Gallup, Sotsiometr) that predict Prime Minister
Serzh Sargsyan’s victory in the first stage of the election are the
real reason for all this. This is an option that is not good for
the other participants of the presidential race as well as for those
political forces who count on getting something from the race. They
all would be deprived from a possibility to engage in talks to gain
something, which is inevitable should there be a run-off, and this
is an accurately veiled "strategic goal" for many of them.

It may look like that there is the "instructive experience " of 1996
when the unification around Vazgen Manukyan ahead of the voting day
helped unite the opposition electorate and even raised its numbers to
some extent. However, what are the chances of a new "snowball effect"
if the votes of the two out of nine candidates – Ter-Petrosyan and
Baghdasaryan – unite?

Two options, while only theoretically, are possible: however, it
is apparent that Ter-Petrosyan will never drop out of the race to
endorse Baghdasaryan because about a dozen of political parties
and organizations have cast their support to Ter-Petrosyan, and
many of them do not accept Baghdasaryan’s candidacy. This means
that Baghdasaryan would become the one to join; but according to
opinion polls, his rating is higher than that of Ter-Petrosyan. The
question is would it be possible to merge the electorates of these
two candidates to support Ter-Petrosyan’s political goals when the
Orinats Yerkir party, which has been left out of the government only
recently, is apparently a more moderate opposition force than those
who support Ter-Petrosyan.

Furthermore, it is not a secret that the Orinats Yerkir party members
and supporters are united on the basis of the "one man party" principle
and Artur Baghdasaryan is that man here. If Baghdasaryan endorses
Ter-Petrosyan, only part of his votes would go to Ter-Petrosyan. The
other members of the party – mostly those who still have jobs in the
lower levels of the government – would not understand such a move by
their leader. The result would be that Ter-Petrosyan’s electorate would
only be equal to that of the size of what Baghdasaryan’s electorate
is currently. This means that after the number of the candidates is
"reduced by one," the total sum of votes [for one candidate] would not
increase but, in fact, would be even less than the sum of their votes.

As for the Heritage party leader’s possible support, it is hard
to expect a serious increase of Ter-Petrosyan’s electorate because
the majority of those who voted for Raffi Hovhannisyan’s party in
the past parliamentary election [in May 2007] have made up their
minds in the past months to vote for another opposition party; some
even have decided to vote for the ARFD. By continuously delaying to
endorse a presidential candidate, the leader of the Heritage party
has diminished the army of his supporters.

So, if Baghdasaryan and Hovhannisyan unite with Ter-Petrosyan,
this would only result in a unification of only one branch of the
opposition and form a kind of a "western bloc" in the camp of the
Armenian opposition.

However, not only inside this country but also outside it, there
would be no serious political circles that would be ready to bet
on the possibility of such rapid and fundamental changes of foreign
political preferences because this perspective does not reflect the
will of the majority of Armenians and would certainly fail in the 19
February election.

[from Armenian]

Armenian Parliamentary Speaker: There Is No Reason To Doubt In Russi

ARMENIAN PARLIAMENTARY SPEAKER: THERE IS NO REASON TO DOUBT IN RUSSIA’S ASPIRATION TO COMBAT XENOPHOBIA

2008-02-07 15:22:00

ArmInfo. The opinion that the Russian authorities intentionally
provoke xenophobic murders is wrong, Speaker of the Armenian Parliament
Tigran Torosyan told ArmInfo commenting on the acquittal verdict made
by Moscow Regional Court in the case of Armneian Artur Sardaryan’s
murder for nationality.

He said the lawyer of 19-year-old Sardaryan’s family Simon Tsaturyan
pledges to appeal against the verdict. ‘Not only Armenians are murdered
in Russia.

However, one can not close eyes on the fact that murders and pressure
on the basis of national intolerance has become so large-scale. We
understant, indeed, that Russia like any other country can punish
the guilty only through judicial instances, However, if the guilt
is not proved, there are no guilty. As a result., the real murderers
are free. Nevertheless, there is no reason to doubt that the Russian
authorities combact xenophobia,’ Tigran Torosyan said.

Exchange Rate Of Armenian Dram Grows By 0.9% Against U.S. Dollar In

EXCHANGE RATE OF ARMENIAN DRAM GROWS BY 0.9% AGAINST U.S. DOLLAR IN JANUARY 2008

Noyan Tapan
Feb 6, 2008

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 6, NOYAN TAPAN. There was 2.4% and 0.9% growth in
consumer prices and the exchange rate of the Armenian dram against
the U.S. dollar respectively in Armenia in January 2008 as compared
with December 2007.

According to the RA National Statistical Service, 2.4% growth of
consumer prices was accompanied by a 0.3% fall in the exchange rate of
the Armenian dram against the dollar in the same period of last year.

The average settlement exchange rate of the Armenian dram against
the dollar made 306.98 drams in January 2008, which is by 15.6%
lower than the respective index of January 2007 (363.71 drams).

Jihad Is Everthing The Golden Rule Is Not

JIHAD IS EVERTHING THE GOLDEN RULE IS NOT

Gates of Vienna
February 2, 2008 Saturday 5:15 PM EST

Feb. 2, 2008 (Gates of Vienna delivered by Newstex) — The paperback
edition of Dr. Andrew Bostoms book, The Legacy of Jihad (complete with
a new preface) is due out this Spring. The following review from The
Winter 2008, Middle East Quarterly is by Professor Johannes J.G.

Jansen, whom Bostom calls the Netherlands leading contemporary scholar
of Islam.

He also credits Jansens work as definitive examinations of the Islamic
movements that gave rise to Al Qaeda.

The re-edition of this remarkable book in paperback form will make it
accessible to more people. However, if you can afford it, I recommend
the hard-bound version. Its a lovely book just to have.

Professor Jansen says:

Bostoms book amply documents the systematic and destructive character
of Islamic jihad, refuting the much-repeated argument that jihad is
a rich concept that has many meanings and that jihad first of all
signifies inner struggle. Jihad is first of all war, bloodshed,
subjugation, and expansion of the faith by violence. The book
implicitly devastates the fashionable but uninformed opinion that all
religions are elaborations of the Golden Rule. Jihad is everything
the Golden Rule is not. [my emphasis – D]

Jihad has been extremely effective and has served Islam well. In the
light of this success, it can hardly be expected from Muslim leaders
that they renounce jihad for more peaceful methods for propagating
their faith. Renunciation of jihad would simply not be in the interest
of Islam. But it would, to the contrary, be very much in the interest
of the rest of the world. How should the rest of the world react
to Muslim insistence on the legitimacy of jihad? Do modern, free,
and democratic societies have the stomach to withstand jihad?

This question becomes more and more important when jihadists see
themselves increasingly not as an alternative to Christianity, Judaism,
or any other faith but as an alternative to democracy. One almost
gets the impression that present-day jihadists fervently desire to
add Islam to the list that starts with Nazism and communism.

Bostom not only presents us with classical mainstream Islamic
sources and their justifications for jihad, plus witness reports
from victims that survived by accident, etc., but he also quotes
contemporary Muslim clerics. For Yusuf al-Qaradawi (b. 1926) discusses
martyrdom operations, a relatively new tactic of jihadists. Are such
operations jihad or suicide? This is an important question because
Islam forbids suicide. Luckily Qaradawi, regarded by many in the
West as a moderate, knows the exact difference between suicide and a
martyrdom operation. Someone who kills himself is too weak to cope
with the situation in which he finds himself. In contrast, the one
who carries out a martyrdom operation does not think of himself. He
sells himself to Allah in order to buy Paradise in exchange.

If this is how the moderates reason, what can we expect from the
radicals?

Answer? Not much

Dr. Bostoms book is not easy to read, but it is worth the effort.

Besides having to wade through the descriptions of the Islamic ritual
of making piles of Hindu heads, you come across fascinating bits
of history.

For example, the people we now know as gypsies fled from the Muslim
invasions into India. They gradually made their way across the world,
the first exodus coinciding with the Arab invasion of Sind (India).

Surprisingly, the Roma are of Hindu stock, though many later converted
to Christianity. Nonetheless they maintained their Roma identity. Roma
means simply man, and they referred to themselves as Roma chave,
or sons of Rama, the Indian God:

Even today, a visit to the new community of Romanies in Skopje in
the southeastern part of Yugoslavia is like entering a village in
Rajasthanwith regard to their language, a large number of the words
in different dialects are of Indian originas their persons and customs
show much of the Hindu character [Chapter Muslims Invade India]

Dr. Bostom has a full account of the Armenian genocide – you know,
the one the Turks say didnt happen. Turkey stonewalls better than
the USSR ever did. On the other hand, theyve had more practice at it.

What I find amazing is that he managed to write this amazing compendium
while maintaining his medical practice. Truly productive people are
examples to the rest of us, we of the couch potato brigade.

BAKU: OIC Parl Union adopts res demanding Armenian withdrawal

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Feb 2 2008

OIC Parliamentary Union adopts resolution demanding unconditional
withdrawal of Armenian troops from Azerbaijani territories

[ 02 Feb 2008 15:26 ]

The fifth session of Parliamentary Union of the Organization of
Islamic Conference (OIC) member states is being held in Cairo, the
capital of Egypt.

Press service of Citizen Solidarity Party told APA that Azerbaijani
delegation has presented the materials covering Nagorno Karabakh
developments to the participants. Two items in connection with
Nagorno Karabakh have been included into the final document adopted
by the Parliamentary Union of the OIC Member States (PUIC). The
participants of the session voted for the items, which demand the
implementation of four UN resolutions on unconditional withdrawal of
Armenian troops from Azerbaijani territories and demand to stop
destruction of Turkish-Islamic monuments in Azerbaijani territories.
Two more resolutions concerning Azerbaijan were adopted at the end of
the session. Organizational issues were considered and elections for
PUIC committees were held in the session.
Azerbaijani parliamentarian Govhar Bakhshaliyeva has been elected
member of the Executive Committee and Sabir Rustamkhanli member of
Political Committee. /APA/

Kocharian questions ex-president’s knowledge of geography

ARMENPRESS

KOCHARIAN QUESTIONS EX-PRESIDENT’S KNOWLEDGE OF
GEOGRAPHY

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 1, ARMENPRESS: President Robert
Kocharian has questioned today ex-president Levon
Ter-Petrosian’s knowledge of geography saying a person
(Ter-Petrosian) who declares that Azerbaijan is
Armenia’s only conduit with the outer world must have
vague knowledge of geography.
Kocharian made the remark in a reference to
Ter-Petrosian’s words that Armenia’s main conduit to
the outside world was Azerbaijan and its railway used
to handle 85 percent of Armenia’s external cargo
turnover under the Soviets. Ter-Petrosian said this
while campaigning in Gegharkunik province on January
30.
Speaking to journalists Robert Kocharian said Azeri
railways used to be part of the former Soviet Union’s
cargo transportation system and Armenia did not run
its own foreign trade at that time.
`This means that some people have poor knowledge of
today’s foreign trade structure. Armenia carries out
its foreign trade with Georgia and Russia through
Georgia and by ferryboats across the Black Sea,’
Kocharian said.
He also suggested that Ter-Petrosian’s statement
should be looked at from a different perspective.
`Negotiations over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
continue with Azerbaijan hoping to use oil revenues to
archive success and is trying to toughen its stance.
Armenia’s ex-presidnet announces that apart from oil
advantage Azerbaijan has also geographic advantage
over Armenia and is the sole conduit for Armenia to
the outer world… If Azeri officials have the same
level of geography knowledge it is then clear that
they will try to further toughen their stance over the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In general, Ter-Petrosian’s
liking of Azerbaijan is beginning suspicious giving
rise to a set of questions,’ Kocharian said.