Parliamentary Elections In Armenia To Become Important Index For Dem

PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN ARMENIA TO BECOME IMPORTANT INDEX FOR DEMOCRATIC PROGRESS IN ARMENIA, IS MENTIONED IN OSCE/ODIHR REPORT

Noyan Tapan
Feb 20 2007

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The parliamentary elections to
be held in Armenia on May 12 will become an important index of the
democratic progress in the country. This is said in the report of the
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR),
in which results of the Needs Assessment Mission implemented by the
organization from January 30 to February 2 are summed up. According
to the OSCE/ODIHR, though the amended Electoral Code of Armenia
gives basis for "honourably and comprehensively" holding democratic
elections, but "the coming elections will first of all demand greater
political will and dilligent usage of the legislation for holding
them in correspondence with the obligations undertaken before the
OSCE." The organization emphasizes that authors of the violations
taken place during the president’s and parliamentary elections held
in Armenia in 2003 were not held to answer what creates an atmosphere
of unpunishment.

"Though the amended electoral code gives possibility of a more
balanced structure of commissions, however, there are still anxieties,
especially, from the side of the opposition, relating to impartiality
of electoral commissions’ administration. Liquidation of the quorum
when making decisions by electoral commissions assists those anxieties,
is said in the report.

According to the organization, political parties in Armenia are more
based on individuals than on platforms or social groups. "The new
pro-governmental "Bargavach Hayastan" (Prosperous Armenia) party which
has functioned since March, 2006, established a wide party net in all
the regions, according to the information, with more than 500 offices
and 370 thousand members," is said in the report. "It was involved
in the charity activity throughout the world what is criticized
as a premature electoral campaign and electoral bribe." "The Needs
Assessment Mission got complaints, according to which, employees of
public enterprises as well as health care and educations institutions
are obliged to join political parties," the OSCE/ODIHR mentions.

As for accessibility of mass media, the organization emphasizes that
"though accessibility of public and private mass media is guaranted
by the law during the official propaganda, however, the opposition
insists that accessibility of mass media before official start of
campaign is very limited."

"Two bodies coordinate electronic mass media: the Television and Radio
National Committee licenses and controls private broadcasters, and
the Public Television and Radio Council controls public mass media,"
the OSCE/ODIHR mentions, emphasizing that all the members of the
coordinating bodies are directly appointed by the country President.

"Two independent TV channels: "A1+" and "Noyan Tapan" which lost their
licences, correspondingly, in 2002 and 2001, remain without frequency
in spite of participation in numerous competitions. Experts on mass
media consider refusal of licences as a clear address directed to
other mass media which are afraid of losing their licences and work
in the atmosphere of self-censorship," is said in the report.

The Needs Assessment Mission proposed to create a mission for
observation of elections, to send on mission 24 long-term observers
in the middle of March, and 300 short-term observers during the
elections days.

Establishment Of New Political Parties On Threshold Of Elections Is

ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW POLITICAL PARTIES ON THRESHOLD OF ELECTIONS IS A GOOD POLITICAL TRICK OF COUNTRY’S AUTHORITIES: REPRESENTATIVE OF ARMENIAN OPPOSITION

Arminfo
2007-02-19 18:55:00

The establishment of new political parties on the threshold of
parliamentary elections is a good political trick of the country’s
authorities, Armenian MP Vazgen Manoukyan, the leader of the opposition
National-Democratic Union, told an ArmInfo correspondent.

According to him, the new parties like the Prosperous Armenia aim
to take a part of the anti-authorities electorate upon themselves,
which will help the ruling regime hold its power. Both the Prosperous
Armenia and the ruling party are managed by the same center. At
first sight, the Prosperous Armenia has an opportunity to obtain the
anti-authorities electorate’s votes, but the establishment of this
party may explain the forthcoming electoral fraud, V.Manoukyan noted.

ANKARA: Buyukanit: US to `wage a better battle’against PKK

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Feb 17 2007

Chief of General Staff Büyükanýt: US to `wage a better battle’
against PKK

Turkey’s top military commander said he had the impression that the
US administration would "wage a better battle" in Turkey’s fight
against terrorist activities carried out by the outlawed Kurdistan
Workers’ Party (PKK).

"It is of course not possible to say anything definite about the
struggle against the PKK before we have definite results. However, I
have the impression that the US administration will have a better way
of fighting the PKK. We will take the end result as a reference point
for our evaluations, though," said Turkish Chief of General Staff
Gen.Yaþar Büyükanýt.
Büyükanýt’s statements came following a meeting at the Pentagon with
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace and US
Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman.
When asked if he could set a deadline for the fight against PKK,
Büyükanýt said that it is not possible to set a deadline for an
anti-terrorism struggle, noting, "Turkey has been fighting against
terrorism since 1984."
Also, when asked to comment on whether Turkey sees the Shahab
missiles Iran possesses as a threat or not, Büyükanýt said that this
issue wasn’t a topic of discussion during his talks with US
officials, but added that "the Turkish military has extensive
technical information about such weapons."
Upon being asked if Turkey is worried about Iran’s possession of such
weapons, Büyükanýt responded by saying, "Of course, Turkey is
worried. Developments of this nature are bound to trigger fear among
countries within a particular region. It is most dangerous when there
is a likelihood of uncontrolled usage of such weapons."
Büyükanýt’s visit to the US capital follows Turkish Foreign Minister
Abdullah Gül’s meeting that focused on the Armenian genocide
resolution introduced to the US House of Representatives.
As part of Turkish efforts to lobby the US Congress to prevent the
resolution’s passage, Büyükanýt is scheduled to meet with Tom Lantos,
head of US House of Representatives Foreign Relations Committee.
Lantos had supported Turkey’s position on the Armenian genocide issue
in the past, but following the Turkish Parliament’s March 1, 2003
decision that did not allow for the deployment of 62,000 US troops
through Turkey for war with Iraq, Lantos said he would shift his
stance on the resolution.
Turkey rejects the genocide label, stating that 300,000 Armenians and
at least as many Turks died in civil strife when Armenians took up
arms for independence in eastern Anatolia and sided with Russian
troops that were invading the Ottoman Empire during World War I.

North Park to Host Lectures on Genocide

Evangelical Covenant Church, IL
Feb 16 2007

North Park to Host Lectures on Genocide

CHICAGO, IL (February 15, 2007) – The third annual Dr. Burton Nelson
Memorial Lectures will be held from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. February 24 in
Isaacson Chapel on the campus of North Park University. This year’s
theme is: `Genocides of the 20th to 21st Centuries.’

Retired North Park Theological Seminary professor John Weborg will
open the day with a tribute to Nelson, his longtime friend who died
in 2004. A longtime professor at North Park Theological Seminary,
Nelson was considered one of the top scholars on the life and work of
German Lutheran pastor and Nazi opponent Dietrich Bonhoeffer and was
a close friend of the Bonhoeffer family.

During the lectures, experts will address `The Concept of Genocide,’
the Jewish Holocaust, and genocide among Armenians, Assyrians,
Rwandans, as well as the Sudanese in Darfur.

The event is free to North Park students, faculty, and staff. Cost is
$15 for others. Lunch will be provided. For more information, email
Jennifer Roth or call 773-244-5640.

http://www.covchurch.org/cov/news/item5409.html

Tripartite meeting in Vienna (ENGLISH ONLY)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
16.02.2006
Ref.108a07
(English only)

Annual High-level meeting between the Council of Europe,
the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe,
the United Nations and partner organizations
in the "Tripartite-Plus" format
Joint Communiqué

1. High-level representatives of the Council of Europe, the Organization
for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the United Nations met on 14
February 2007 in Vienna for their annual consultations in the
"Tripartite-Plus" format.(*)

2. The meeting discussed a number of issues related to the
implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, adopted by
the UN General Assembly on 8 September 2006.

3. Participants confirmed that preventing and combating terrorism
remains among the main priorities of their organizations and reiterated
that there can be no justification of terrorism whatsoever.

4. Participants welcomed the adoption of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism
Strategy, which outlines a comprehensive global approach towards
countering this phenomenon by addressing not only its manifestations,
but also the conditions conducive to its spread.

5. Participants underlined also the utmost importance of promoting and
protecting human rights for all and the rule of law while combating
terrorism and welcomed the strong focus of the Strategy on this issue.

6. Participants agreed that the Strategy can be efficiently implemented
only through the consistent long-term efforts of society as a whole and
underscored the paramount importance of initiatives and programmes aimed
at promoting tolerance and mutual respect for other cultures, religions
and beliefs.

7. Participants reviewed their existing and emerging programmes and
initiatives and discussed how they could contribute to the
implementation of the Strategy. They agreed that their main efforts,
within their respective mandates, should focus on preventing and
combating terrorism by, inter alia:

* Raising awareness about the multi-faceted terrorist threat and helping
to generate the political will to counter it.
* Strengthening initiatives aimed at the prevention of radicalization,
violent extremism and incitement to terrorism, while at the same time
promoting inter- and intra-religious and cultural dialogue, tolerance
and mutual respect, especially through education and close co-operation
with civil society and the media. Special attention needs to be
addressed to the Internet, both in view of preventing its use for
terrorist purposes and as a means to counter terrorist ideology.

* Strengthening the international legal framework against terrorism,
including through supporting ratification and legislative implementation
of the universal anti-terrorism instruments, as well as those regional
instruments which complement or reinforce them, and through the
conclusion of additional bilateral, regional and multi-lateral
agreements, with the objective of establishing a universal legal regime
against terrorism and ensuring that terrorists are prosecuted
effectively for their crimes on the basis of the principle "prosecute or
extradite".

* Promoting international co-operation and ensuring that any measures
taken to prevent and combat terrorism comply fully with obligations
under international law, in particular human rights law, refugee law and
international humanitarian law.

* Promoting international solidarity in support of victims of terrorism
and their families.

* Identifying and drawing the attention of national authorities and the
international community to areas where deficiencies exist or more
efforts need to be applied, developing their own instruments or
mechanisms, including capacity-building programmes and activities, to
address such gaps, when their mandates allow it.

* Developing effective co-ordination and co-operation among
international organizations and between the international community, the
national authorities and civil society. Encouraging, where appropriate,
the development and dissemination of international guidance and
recommendations representing good practices in combating terrorism.

* Promoting developmental goals, including sustained economic growth,
sustainable development, good governance, human rights for all and the
rule of law, political and social inclusion, as well as empowerment, as
important means of addressing conditions which may be conducive to the
spread of violent extremism and terrorism.

* Improving border control and management and, in particular, travel
documents, customs control and detection capabilities, in order to
prevent the movement of terrorist or the illicit traffic in, inter alia,
small arms and light weapons, including man-portable air defence systems
(MANPADs), and nuclear, chemical, biological or radiological weapons and
materials.

* Preventing the financing of terrorism and money laundering as an
important prerequisite for curbing terrorist activities.
Capacity-building assistance has to be provided to national authorities
in developing relevant legislation and setting up of Finance
Intelligence Units and appropriate procedures, in order to efficiently
implement the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force.

* Promoting public-private partnership in the fight against terrorism in
such areas as, inter alia,transport and critical infrastructure
security, supply chain security, border and customs control, money
laundering and terrorist financing, and preventing the use of the
Internet for terrorist purposes.

9. Participants reviewed the status of mutual co-ordination and
co-operation, and highlighted the progress achieved and existing
challenges. They agreed that further efforts should be devoted to
enhance co-ordination between the United Nations and regional and other
intergovernmental organizations. They also stressed the importance and
usefulness of regional and sub-regional organizations learning from each
other and helping each other develop counter-terrorism programmes and
activities through regular contacts, exchanges and meetings.

10. Participants reviewed and approved the outcome of the Expert-Level
Meeting on the implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism
Strategy, held on 13 February 2007. This meeting reviewed in detail
programmes and activities already undertaken and planned in the areas of
both preventing and combating terrorism and addressing the conditions
conducive to its spread, acknowledging that many of them contribute to
the implementation of the Strategy. Mutual expectations and follow up
measures for the further implementation of the Strategy were also
discussed, as were experiences and lessons learnt, and problems and
limitations the organizations face. The need to strengthen co-ordination
and co-operation between the participating organizations was also
examined with a view to further enhancing mutual interaction.

11. Participants agreed to transmit the findings and practical
recommendations of the meeting to the 8th High-Level Meeting between the
United Nations and Regional Organizations and to the United Nations
Counter-Terrorism Committee.

12. It was agreed that the next Tripartite meting would be hosted by the
Council of Europe in early 2008.

———————-
(*) The meeting was the 15th in a series initiated in July 1993. The
annual discussions – which are chaired and hosted in turn by the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the Council
of Europe (CoE) and the United Nations Office at Geneva (UNOG) on behalf
of the United Nations – are intended to share information and improve
practical cooperation by drawing on each other’s expertise and know-how.
Over time, the agenda has widened, from an essentially humanitarian
emphasis, to fields related to human rights, conflict prevention,
conflict management and post-conflict peacebuilding. The number of
participating organizations has also increased, so that consultations
are informally referred to as the "Tripartite-plus" process. The
European Commission (EC), the General Secretariat of the Council of the
European Union (EU), the International Organization for Migration (IOM)
and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), who participate
as affiliated members, have been joined for this meeting by the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
A wide range of representatives from the UN system – including
Secretariat departments and offices, and the funds, programmes and
specialized agencies – also participated.

Annex

CHAIRMAN’S SUMMARY TO THE HIGH-LEVEL MEETING
OF THE EXPERT-LEVEL MEETING
ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UN GLOBAL COUNTER-TERRORISM STRATEGY

The Expert-level Meeting was dedicated to discussing in detail a number
of practical issues, related to
the implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and the
concrete ways that
international and regional organizations can contribute to this.

Session I focused on measures to prevent and combat terrorism in the
following areas:

* promoting States becoming party to international legal instruments
against terrorism.

Participants stressed that the Strategy considers this a core area in
the fight against terrorism, as it contributes to the establishment of a
common international legal regime against terrorism. They acknowledged
the high level of ratification achieved in the region where the OSCE and
Council of Europe operate. They stressed the continued need for and the
importance of capacity-building assistance provided by UN bodies in
co-operation with regional organizations for the legislative
implementation of the legal instruments. The added value provided by
regional and sub-regional organizations devising their own legal
instruments to complement or reinforce the existing international
instruments was underlined.

Participants pointed out that some reservations of some states with
regard to some of the international legal instruments against terrorism
are a source of concern as they may detract from the overall
effectiveness of the global legal framework against terrorism.

* protecting human rights while fighting terrorism

The participants strongly underlined that protecting and promoting human
rights is a cornerstone of any counter-terrorism effort if it is to be
credible and that this understanding should continue to be actively
promoted in their work. This could also be achieved through involving
counter-terrorism practitioners in promoting human rights. Participants
underlined the importance of the provision of the Strategy requiring
from states to consider becoming parties without delay to the core
international instruments on human rights law, refugee law and
international humanitarian law, and implementing them, as well as to
consider accepting the competence of international and relevant regional
human rights monitoring bodies. They stressed that especially
anti-terrorism related legislation should be drafted in a way compliant
with international human rights standards and that attempts to misuse
such legislation for political purposes should be countered. Solidarity
with victims of terrorism as an important element of the Strategy was
underlined.

A number of concrete issues that raise serious human rights concerns and
which need to be specifically addressed in the context of
counter-terrorism include practical challenges to the absolute
prohibition on torture, extra-ordinary renditions and the practice of
secret detention. The practical benefits of a human rights-based
approach to international co-operation in combating terrorism were also
highlighted.

* facilitating and promoting international co-operation in criminal
matters related to terrorism

Participants underlined this area as another key element for the
implementation of the Strategy with the aim to ensure that terrorist
acts are prosecuted effectively. The ongoing programmes of the three
organizations for enhancing legal co-operation in criminal matters
related to terrorism were noted as an excellent example of global bodies
and regional organizations working together to strengthen national
capacities. It was pointed out that work to enhance understanding among
national judicial authorities of the existing international legal
framework should continue and aim to provide a systemic impact including
through implementing a train-the-trainers approach. The need for an
integrated approach, involving co-operation of both the judicial and law
enforcement authorities was underlined.

* border and customs control

Participants agreed that porous borders constitute a major challenge in
the fight against terrorism. They pointed out that insufficient and
ineffective border controls create opportunities not only for terrorists
to move unimpeded, but also to traffic weapons and dangerous substances,
including nuclear and radiological materials. Support for the Interpol
database of lost and stolen travel documents (ASFSLTD), the IAEA
programmes and the WCO Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate
Global Trade were indicated as important factors in improving border
security. The need for an integrated and comprehensive approach towards
border management was highlighted.

* countering incitement to commit terrorist acts and related offences

Participants agreed that this is an area which needs more effort by both
the international community and national authorities. They noted the
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism(2005) and
the UNSCR 1624 (2005) as providing a response to this issue in a human
rights compliant manner. The importance of the right of freedom of
expression was emphasised. At the same time it was pointed out that this
is a right of qualified nature, but strong safeguards are needed to
ensure that any limitations to it are strictly in accordance with the
provisions of the relevant human rights instruments. It was noted that
while in most states the necessary legal base is in place to address
direct incitement, this was not the case with regard to indirect
incitement and further work was needed in this area.

* countering the use of the Internet for terrorist purposes

The use of the Internet for terrorist purposes was also highlighted by
participants as an area where more effort is needed by both the
international community and national authorities. Participants agreed
that ignoring this problem was creating dangerous loopholes in the
global counter-terrorism effort. Reference was made to the Council of
Europe Cybercrime Convention as an important instrument in this area. It
was stressed also that the Internet provides an important medium for
countering terrorism both through technological means and through
countering terrorist ideology and this approach should be encouraged and
promoted.

* developing public-private partnerships in the fight against terrorism

Participants stressed the necessity to further develop co-operation and
interaction with the business community in countering terrorism. A
number of concrete areas where such interaction was ongoing were
highlighted, including travel document security, transport and supply
chain security, aviation security. At the same time there was a clear
need to expand that partnership to other areas, including with regard to
countering the use of the Internet for terrorist purposes.

Session II focused on the following measures to address the conditions
conducive to the spread of terrorism:

* promoting dialogue, tolerance and understanding among civilizations,
cultures and religions

The central place that this issue takes in the Strategy was underlined,
as it represents a fundamental factor in countering terrorism. A number
of programmes and initiatives of the participating organizations were
reviewed, such as the Council of Europe White Paper on Inter-Cultural
Dialogue, with a focus on the creation of a democratic culture and on
education as a primary tool for embedding the values of tolerance and
understanding in the public conscience. The importance of the Alliance
of Civilizations initiative was stressed as well as the importance of
the work of the OSCE and the Council of Europe with the adjacent areas,
in particular within the Mediterranean basin.

* peaceful resolution of conflicts as a means for strengthening the
global fight against terrorism

Participants agreed that conflict prevention and peaceful resolution of
conflicts are important factors in preventing the emergence of
conditions that are conducive to terrorism. The strong background and
contribution of the participating organizations in this area were
highlighted. The respective mechanisms that exist in each of the
organizations were reviewed and further avenues for work were chartered,
including the development of educational programmes to promote a common
understanding of history

and to overcome feelings of injustice.
Participants pointed out that lack of respect for human rights and the
rule of law can be a significant source of conflict.

* * *

In conclusion the participants underlined that there has been a positive
experience of joint work of the three organizations in many different
areas and formats. In particular the joint country visits to assess the
implementation of UNSCR 1373, lead by UNCTC, with the participation of
the OSCE and the Council of Europe and involving UN entities and
specialized international organizations, have proved a very useful tool
by providing a platform for integrating the expertise and experience of
different players. At the same time they pointed out that there is
always room for improvement and the meeting has played a positive role
in this regard. Participants noted the importance of the UN
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force in ensuring overall
co-ordination and coherence in the counter-terrorism efforts of the
United Nations system and its potential usefulness in aligning global
and regional counterterrorism programmes and activities.

TBILISI: Surge in trade underscores Georgian-Armenian cooperation

The Messenger, Georgia
Feb 15 2007

Surge in trade underscores Georgian-Armenian cooperation
By M. Alkhazashvili
(Translated by Diana Dundua)

Data from the last three quarters of 2006 show that trade turnover
between Georgia and Armenia exceeded USD 90 million, shooting up from
the same period in 2005, the Armenian ambassador told newspaper
Svobodnaya Gruzia.

Georgian imports to Armenia surged by a staggering 154.3 percent, and
Armenian imports to Georgia increased by 119.4 percent.

"These data are really impressive, and this is the only beginning of
deep cooperation in the future between our two countries," says
Armenian Ambassador Grach Silvanian.

One of the most significant examples of the two countries economic
cooperation is the building of the new 400-kilowatt electricity
transmission line. After the constriction works are finished, the
Georgian and Armenian electrical systems will be able to work in
parallel.

Georgia and Armenia have also agreed to closely collaborate in
solving the social and economic problems existing in the Armenian
populated Javakheti region of southern Georgia. Armenia will help
restore and develop social infrastructure in the area.

The Industrialist and Entrepreneurs Union of Armenia intend to open
wholesale trade centres in Tbilisi and Batumi where Armenian
industrial and agricultural products will be sold.

The Armenian business sector is especially interested in Adjara. An
Armenian Consulate is soon to be opened in Batumi, and this city and
Armenia’s Vanadzor have recently signed a Friendship Agreement.

Vardan Oskanian: "Our Aim Is To Have Firm Armenian Statehood"

VARDAN OSKANIAN: "OUR AIM IS TO HAVE FIRM ARMENIAN STATEHOOD"
By Anahit Hovsepian, Koln

AZG Armenian Daily
15/02/2007

Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian’s Speech in Koln

"We Failed the Previous Elections; We Cannot Makle The Same Mistake
Once Again"

On February 11, 3:00 PM a large crowd had gathered at the Koln
Saint Sahak-Mesrop church in order to listen to the speech of Vardan
Oskanian, Foreign Minister of the Republic of Armenia, who had arrived
on a meeting with the German Armenian Diaspora in Koln immediately
after the Munich Conference.

The Foreign Minister started his speech with comments on the project
of reconstruction and restoration of the Armenian villages near the
Azerbaijani border.

"The goal of the program is to create an area where the next
generations can live in peace," he said. He also expressed his thoughts
about the 15-th anniversary of the Republic of Armenia. He said that
the Armenians must have done much in those 15 years and have to do
moire in the next 15. He emphasized recollecting all the mistakes
and trying not to repeat them again. Mr. Oskanian spoke of Armenia’s
challenges of the nearest coming years – reducing the corruption and
establishing a truly democratic state.

Speaking of the foreign political affairs of Armenia, the Minister
stressed that Azerbaijan became stronger in the region after the
construction of the Baku-Ceyhan gas pipeline and its partnership with
Turkey is growing closer and closer. Denial of the Armenian Genocide
has long ago became the offical policy of the Turkish authorities. The
UN is imposing sanctions against Iran, of which Armenian will certainly
suffer, too. Negative atmosphere in Georgia-Russia relations also
affects Armenia. The Armenian authorities must make their right way
through all those obstacles to minimize their negative influence. The
question of Kars-Akhalqalaq-Tbilisi-Baku railroad project has been
always used as means of political pressure, and thus it will be still
for a long time, said Vardan Oskanian.

The Foreign Minister expressed confidence that the people of Armenia
will prove itseld able to overcome all the aforementioned hardship,
as it had done throughout the past 15 years, providing two-digit
economical growth immediately after the economic blockade, reduction of
poverty, creation of new vacancies and improvement of life conditions
as a result. He said that foreign policy is just means of providing
the well-being of the Armenian citizens and stability inside the
state. "Our aim is to have a firm Armenian satehood," he added.

Referring to the Nagorno-Karabakh problem Prime Minister Oskanian
assured that its final solution will be certainly achieved, although
none can tell how much time it will take.

Of Armenia-Turkey relations Mr. Oskanian said: "A light sprang up
after the murder of Hrant Dink – it seemed that Turkey, feeling the
wrongfulness of its policy, wouldtry to use the chance to amend its
faults. But that did not happen, and now the Turkish authorities put up
more resources to extinguish the Armenian Genocide recognition process
inside and outside Turkey. This remains Armenia’s main challenge in
foreign policy". He said that in response to this Armenia can only
develop its economy, and in this process Armenia-Diaspora relations
must prove themselves most useful. The Diaspora has a problem of
preserving the national identity and in this issue the role of the
modern Republic of Armenia, not the historical past must be first. On
the other hand, Armenia, with only 3 million population, needs its
numerous Diaspora, said the Foreign Minister. Mr.

Oskanian announced that the "Armenia" ("Hayastan") Foundation is
the most reliable structure for the independent Armenia. He informed
that the Foundation has undertaken the implementation of 50 villages’
restoration program.

As one of most important challenges of Armenia the Foreign Minister
pointed out preserving high economy growth rates. He said that at
present Armenia is the first in the region by average income per head,
but Azerbaijan has reached Armenia and seems to get advantage. Georgia
also seems to have similar plans.

Then Mr. Oskanian answered the questions of the auditorium. The first
question was about Russia’s project of establishing an oil-processing
factory in Armenia. The Foreign Minister stated that the exploitation
of the ran-Armenia line will soon be started. The Power Engineering
Minister of Armenia is now on a visit to Teheran and the project
of constructing an oil plant on the very Armenia-Iran border is
seriously considered.

To the question about Armenia-Georgia relations Mr.

Oskanian replied that partnership with Georgia has strategic
importance for Armenia’s and that both the states have numerous
common interests. Azerbaijan and Turkey are trying to sever Georgia
from Armenia, and that is well understood by the Georgian authorities.

Answering the question about Turkey’s benefit of opening the
border with Armenia, Mr. Oskanian said that opening the border will
considerably contribute the economy of both the states and that all
the problems can be solved by corresponding legislation.

He once again stressed that all the controversies between two states
must be settled on governmental level, that is why the Armenian
authorities emphasize establishing normal relations with Turkey
without preconditions.

As a reply to the question about Turkey’s reaction to the possible
adoption of the Armenian Genocide resolution by the US Congress,
Vardan Oskanian said that in case the resolution is adopted, Turkey
strengthen the denial of the fact of the Genocide. On the other hand,
other states will recognize the Genocide, following the USA ‘s example,
which will increase the pressure upon Turkey. That will give Armenia
more opportunity of addressing to the UN and the International
Court. At last Turkey will be forced to revise its position on eth
Armenian Genocide in connection with the issue of its EU membership.

Mr. Oskanian was asked why the Armenians did not appeal to the
International Court in connection with Hrant Dink’s murder, as
the Lebanese did after the assassination of the Prime Minister of
Lebanon. The Armenian Foreign Minister said that Dink was not a
statesman or a politician, therefore such an action would be incorrect.

It Is Difficult To Convince Azerbaijan

IT IS DIFFICULT TO CONVINCE AZERBAIJAN

Panorama.am
16:29 13/02/2007

Manvel Sargsyan, ex-adviser to Nagorno Karabakh president,
representative of Karabakh in Armenia and expert of Caucasus analytical
center, said Azerbaijani president has clearly uttered the disposition
of that country to isolate Armenia. The operation of Baku-Jeihan oil
pipeline and construction of Kars-Akhalkalak railway comply with the
political realm of Aliev.

The Armenian side keeps to the attitudes of the international
community which has a scheme on the table trying "to recover regional
and demographic status-quo in the region and after that to decide on
the status." However, Sargsyan says he cannot imagine how Azerbaijan
may be convinced to find a solution of mutual consent.

BAKU: "Zerkalo": Bush Asked Congress Not To Recognize "Genocide Of A

"ZERKALO": BUSH ASKED CONGRESS NOT TO RECOGNIZE "GENOCIDE OF ARMENIANS"

Ïðaâî Âûaîða, Azerbaijan
Democractic Azerbaijan
Feb 14 2007

US President George Bush forwarded letter to the House of
Representatives requesting not to approve draft bill on recognition of
"genocide of Armenians".

APA informs that Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Abdulla Gul,
informed about it. Accordingly to him, Bush’s administration is
against approval of the draft bill and will do its best to prevent
adoption of the said document. A. Gul underlined that in case this
draft bill is approved Turkish -American relation will face crisis:
"US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, promised to undertake steps
not to adopt this document".

It should be stressed that Armenian lobby is getting ready to present
the similar draft bill to upper chamber of the Congress – senate.

Pro-armenian congressmen, Frank Pallone and Joe Nollenberg forwarded
letter to the chairman of the Committee on international relations of
the House of Representatives, stating that "Turkey is blackmailing
USA and it is inadmissible". Accordingly to them, Ankara threatens
Washington to stop arm delivery, fuel and foodstuffs via Turkish
territory for American army in Iraq. It should be reminded that
draft bill on "genocide of Armenians" will be, first of all,
considered by the Committee on international relations of the House
of Representatives.

–Boundary_(ID_RMgKpm0GiA0LvKvoK ViX6A)–

Recognition Of Kosovo’s Independence To Have Essential Impact On All

RECOGNITION OF KOSOVO’S INDEPENDENCE TO HAVE ESSENTIAL IMPACT ON ALL UNSETTLED CONFLICTS: ARMENIAN EXPERT

Yerevan, February 13. ArmInfo. The recognition of Kosovo’s independence
will have an essential impact on all the unsettled conflicts, Political
Scientist Manvel Sargsyan, an expert of the Caucasus Center and the
former advisor to the Nagorno-Karabakh President for foreign affairs,
said at a press-conference at the discussion club, Tuesday.

According to him, it is not that this may create a precedent. After
the recognition of Kosovo, the interests of powerful states will come
into collision. Particularly, being against Kosovo’s independence,
Russia may immediately recognize Abkhazia’s independence, which will
considerably change the situation in immediate proximity to the region
where Armenia is situated.