European Court Fines Turkey In Greek Orthodox Case

EUROPEAN COURT FINES TURKEY IN GREEK ORTHODOX CASE
By Ayla Jean Yackley

Reuters
March 3 2009
UK

ISTANBUL (Reuters) – The European Court of Human Rights Tuesday ruled
Turkey had violated the property rights of a Greek Orthodox foundation
by seizing its land and ordered the government to pay damages.

Judges said Turkey had breached the European Convention on Human Rights
by barring the foundation from registering its title to a church and
surrounding lands on the Aegean island of Bozcaada, a statement from
the court said.

It is the latest ruling by the Strasbourg-based court against Turkey
for violating the property rights of its ethnic Greek minority. The
European Union, which Turkey seeks to join, has called on the
government to return seized properties to minorities and expand their
religious and cultural freedoms.

The European Court of Human Rights fined Turkey 105,000 euros
($131,880) for damages and expenses after it ruled authorities had
illegally prevented the rightful owner of the Kimisis Teodoku Greek
Orthodox Church from registering its property, the statement said.

The foundation was denied the right to register its title to three
pieces of land and a building on the island after the state land
registry was reorganized in 1991, the statement said.

Turkish courts had ruled against the foundation because it had
missed an initial deadline to re-register its deed and had ordered
the property be turned over to the state Treasury.

The Istanbul-based Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, spiritual leader of 250
million faithful worldwide, has filed more than two dozen cases with
the European Court of Human Rights to recover some of the thousands
of properties it says it has lost.

In September, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in a separate
case that Turkey had violated the property rights of the patriarchate
by seizing a 100-year-old orphanage on an island off of Istanbul and
ordered its return.

It has also ruled that Turkey illegally took control of other
properties in Istanbul owned by Greek foundations.

About 25 mostly elderly ethnic Greeks live on Bozcaada, part
of a community of 2,500 Greeks in Turkey, which is 99 percent
Muslim. Istanbul, Turkey’s largest city, is also home to about 15,000
Jews and 60,000 Armenians.

Turkey-Russia Ties: A Strategic Game?

TURKEY-RUSSIA TIES: A STRATEGIC GAME?
By Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Kashmir Watch
?subaction=showfull&id=1236033204&archive= &start_from=&ucat=3&var0news=value0new s
March 2 2009

As his first ever trip to Russia since becoming Turkish President,
Abdullah Gul paid a four-day visit to the Russian Federation
from February 12 to 15 and met the Russian leaders discussing
various diplomatic and economic matters. Russian Prime Minister
Vladimir Putin emphasized after his talks with the visiting Turkish
President that Turkey is "a priority in our Russian foreign policy"
and Russia and Turkey are set to forge strategic ties as foreign
policy priority.. On February 14, Abdullah Gul held talks with
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and adopted a joint declaration
after the talks to promote ties and enhance bilateral friendship
and partnership. In the declaration, announcing their commitment to
deepening mutual friendship and multi-dimensional cooperation, the two
Presidents urged action to take effective measures to settle frozen
conflicts that could destabilize the situation in the South Caucasus.

The Government of Prime Minister Recep Erdogan has shown increasing
impatience with not only Washington policies in the Middle East,
but also the refusal of the European Union to seriously consider
Turkey’s bid to join the EU. In the situation, it’s natural that
Turkey would seek some counterweight to what had been since the Cold
War overwhelming US influence in Turkish politics. Russia’s Putin and
Medvedev have no problem opening such a dialogue, much to Washington’s
dismay. Russia praised Turkey’s diplomatic initiatives in the region.

Following G�l’s visit, Medvedev will go to Turkey to follow up
the issues with concrete cooperation proposals. The Turkish-Russian
cooperation is a further indication of how the once overwhelming
US influence in Eurasia has been eroded by the events of recent US
foreign policy in the region. Meanwhile, NATO, as before, is busy
devising strategies to prevent strategic cooperation among the great
powers of Eurasia and keep the region under influence of the USA-led
western powers. Russia and Turkey are neighboring countries that are
developing their relations on the basis of mutual confidence. The
visits will in turn give a new character to their relations.

Rapprochement

As Russia’s natural geopolitical rival in the 19th Century Turkey was
considered by the Kremlin as a threat and new post-Soviet Russia also
felt uncomfortable because of Turkey’s quasi-alliance with Ukraine,
Azerbaijan, and Georgia until recently led Moscow to view Turkey
as a formidable rival. Emerging Turkey’s close relationship with
Central Asian states created a jerk in Moscow. The regional military
balance has developed in favor of Turkey in Black Sea and the Southern
Caucasus. As Russia and Ukraine argued over the division of the Black
Sea fleet and status of Sevastopol, the Black Sea became an area for
NATO’S Partnership for Peace exercises.

Now today, Russia is a major energy exporter to Turkey, pumping
natural gas across the Black Sea through the Blue Stream pipeline,
the largest Russian-Turkish energy project. As a major geopolitical
Great Game, Turkey and Russia are gradually moving closer to cooperate
on economic, strategic and other issues. Moscow and Ankara agreed
that energy was a strategic sphere in bilateral cooperation that had
potential for growth. They also vowed to move quicker in settling
issues related to bilateral defense cooperation. Setting aside
uneasy political issues of the past, Turkey and Russia are exploring
further rapprochement to improve sociopolitical and commercial ties,
to enhance the prospects for regional energy development projects and
to have a broad stabilizing effect, especially around their borders.

Even as the greatest game between the "cold war" adversaries USA and
Russia make every possible effort to outsmart one another globally
and regionally, Russia, for quite some time now, has been wooing
its neighbors for beneficial ties. As former empire lords, Russians
and Turks have lived side by side for centuries both collaborating
and confronting with one another. Following his stay in Moscow,
Gul traveled to Kazan, the capital of Russia’s predominantly Muslim
republic of Tatarstan, mainly consists of Muslim Tatar Turks, and
discussed joint investments.

Taking advantage of the cool relations between Washington and longtime
NATO ally, Turkey, Moscow invited Turkish President Abdullah Gul
to a four day state visit to discuss a wide array of economic and
political cooperation issues. Both Russia and Turkey, apart from
USA, try to influence the Central Asian states and pull them toward
themselves. Geographical proximity and an ethno-cultural background
provide a resource for both countries to forge closer ties with
the Central Asian republics. In the 1990’s in sharp contrast to the
tranquility of the Cold War era, talk of regional rivalries, revived
‘Great Games’ in Eurasia, confrontations in the Caucasus and Central
Asia were common. Russia does not want too many enemies around its
borders and cultivates economic and security ties with Turkey too to
restrict any geopolitical rival as in the 19th Century.

Both Turkey and Russia share substantial ethnic, linguistic and
cultural ties with Central Asia. The populations of Central Asian
countries are mostly Sunni Muslims, like those of Turkey. Russian
and Central Asian gas and oil need to be exported via Turkey to other
countries. From ordinary citizens to regional experts and political
authorities, all want dialogue and cooperation between the two
countries in order to improve prosperity, peace and stability in the
region. Medvedev commended Turkey’s actions during the Russian-Georgian
war last summer and Turkey’s subsequent proposal for the establishment
of a Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform (CSCP). The Russian
President said the Georgia crisis had shown their ability to deal with
such problems on their own without the involvement of outside powers,
meaning Washington. Turkey had proposed the CSCP, bypassing Washington
and not seeking transatlantic consensus on Russia. Since then, Turkey
has indicated its intent to follow a more independent foreign policy.

Cooperation in energy

As of now, Turkish-Russian economic ties have greatly expanded over
the past decade, with trade volume reaching $32 billion in 2008,
making Russia Turkey’s number one partner. Given this background,
bilateral economic ties were a major item on Gul’s agenda and both
leaders expressed their satisfaction with the growing commerce between
their countries.

Besides the oil and gas industry, Turkish companies benefit from
major investments in Russia and Central Asian countries, such as
the construction of airports and pipelines and operating hotels and
supermarkets. Russia’s economy is now reeling from the sharp fall in
oil prices, and its stock market is down 75 percent since last summer
as the world economy collapses into recession.

Cooperation in energy is the major area. Turkey’s gas and oil imports
from Russia account for most of the trade volume. Russian press reports
indicate that the two sides are interested in improving cooperation in
energy transportation lines carrying Russian gas to European markets
through Turkey, the project known as Blue Stream-2. Previously Ankara
had been cool to the proposal. The recent completion of the Russian
Blue Stream gas pipeline under Black Sea increased Turkey’s dependence
on Russian natural gas from 66 percent up to 80 percent. Furthermore,
Russia is beginning to see Turkey as a transit country for its energy
resources rather than simply an export market, the significance of
Blue Stream 2.

Russia is also eager to play a major part in Turkey’s attempts to
diversify its energy sources. A Russian-led consortium won the tender
for the construction of Turkey’s first nuclear plant recently, but as
the price offered for electricity was above world prices, the future
of the project, awaiting parliamentary approval, remains unclear. Prior
to Gul’s Moscow trip, the Russian consortium submitted a revised offer,
reducing the price by 30 percent. If this revision is found legal under
the tender rules, the positive mood during Gul’s trip may indicate
the Turkish government is ready to give the go-ahead for the project.

Russia’s market also plays a major role for Turkish overseas
investments and exports. Russia is one of the main customers for
Turkish construction firms and a major destination for Turkish
exports. Similarly, millions of Russian tourists bring significant
revenues to Turkey every year. Importantly, Turkey and Russia may
start to use the Turkish lira and the Russian ruble in foreign trade,
which could increase Turkish exports to Russia, as well as weakening
dependence on dollar mediation.

Russia strives for membership of WTO. In addition to opening to Turkey,
a vital transit route for natural gas to Western Europe, Russia is
also working to firm an economic space with Belarus and other former
Soviet republics to firm its alliances. Moscow delivered a major
blow to the US military encirclement strategy in Central Asia when
it succeeded earlier this month in convincing Kyrgyzstan, with the
help of major financial aid, to cancel US military airbase rights at
Manas, a major blow to US escalation plans in Afghanistan. In short,
Moscow is demonstrating it is far from out of the new Great Game for
influence over Eurasia.

The Russian aim is to use its economic resources to counter the
growing NATO encirclement, made severe by the Washington decision
to place missile and radar bases in Poland and the Czech Republic
aimed at Moscow. To date the Obama Administration has indicated it
will continue the Bush ‘missile defense’ policy. Washington also just
agreed to place US Patriot missiles in Poland, clearly not aimed at
Germany, but at Russia.

Post-Script: Warmer relations

As the post-Cold War tensions got reduced a relatively peaceful
atmosphere came into existence with countries with different
politico-economic philosophies forging beneficial ties across
the globe and the scene of Russo-Turkey relations is a case in
point. Russo-Turkey relations are marked by non-confrontations and
devoid of mutual mistrust. Ever since Russia became independent from
USSR in 1992, the Russian leaders began charting a foreign policy
with fewer conflicts across the world and that seems to have worked
positive for Moscow. The CIS, floated by Russia following the fallof
USSR, seen in Moscow as its traditional sphere of influence, became
one of the foreign policy priorities under Putin, as the EU and NATO
have grown to encompass much of Central Europe and, more recently,
the Baltic states.

The main message of Gul’s visit to Moscow in Feb 09 was for greater
energy coordination and the development of stronger political ties
between the two neighbors. Presidents Medvedev and Gul, as well as
Putin, repeated the position that, as the two major powers in the area,
cooperation between Russia and Turkey was essential to regional peace
and stability. That marked a dramatic change from the early 1990’s
after the collapse of the USSR when Washington encouraged Ankara to
move into historically Ottoman regions of the former Soviet Union
to counter Russia’s influence. The declaration signed mirrors a
previous ‘Joint Declaration on the Intensification of Friendship
and Multidimensional Partnership,’ signed during a 2004 visit by
then-President Putin.

Turkey, a rarest nation to openly slam, face to face, the Israeli
holocaust in Palestine when the entire Arab world was just watching the
genocides show on screen . Following Gul’s visit, some press in Turkey
described Turkish-Russian relations as a ‘strategic partnership,’
a label traditionally used for Turkish-American relations. Russia
elevated Gul’s trip from the previously announced status of an
‘official visit’ to a ‘state visit,’ the highest level of state
protocol, indicating the value Moscow now attaches to Turkey. There
seems to be shift in approaches. In previous years, Moscow was
convinced that Turkey was trying to establish Pan-Turanism in the
Caucasus and Central Asia and inside the Russian Federation, a huge
concern in Moscow . Today clearly Turkish relations with Turk entities
inside the Russian Federation are not considered suspicious as it
was once, confirming a new mood of mutual trust.

The short-term fluctuations in Russian-Turkish relations arise from
issues such as commercial land transit, customs regulations and the
use of the passageway of the Turkish Straits. Despite the problems
of the ruble and the weak oil price in recent months for the Russian
economy, the Russian Government is pursuing a very active foreign
policy strategy. Its elements focus on countering the continuing
NATO encirclement policy of Washington, with often clever diplomatic
initiatives on its Eurasian periphery.

The rapprochement between Turkey and Russia is to consolidate a
long period of peace and stability and to address their current
economic problems. This would, politically, improve the situation in
the conflict-ridden zones in the Caucasus. It may, in the long run,
further contribute to normalizing diplomatic relations between Turkey
and Armenia, Georgia and Russia, and especially to a Nagorno-Karabakh
settlement between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Moscow also wishes to
increase its investments in the countries whose economies could be
reinforced by expanded trade with Turkey.

Turkey functions as a bridge between continents and cultures, not as
a barrier to the common good. The Turkish president’s visit should
be interpreted as expanding relations in the political, economic
and cultural fields rather than as a minor political gesture or
a shift in Turkish foreign policy. This rapprochement does not
threaten Turkey’s ties with the USA, Europe, and other countries in
the region or Turkey’s NATO membership. With the backing of the USA,
Ankara also expects Moscow’s influence as part of EU-Russia Permanent
Partnership over its EU bid, although Russia is still struggling to
obtain equal status with EU. The European Union is Russia’s largest
trading partner and the largest consumer of Russian energy, while
Russia is the largest energy supplier to the EU. As it stand now,
the Russo-Turkish relations are bound to flourish further.

http://www.kashmirwatch.com/showarticles.php

With Armenian State Budget Means A 1.7km Bypassing Road To Be Constr

WITH ARMENIAN STATE BUDGET MEANS A 1.7 km BYPASSING ROAD TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE 243 km SECTOR OF MEGHRI-YEREVAN HIGHWAY

ARMENPRESS
March 2, 2009

KAPAN, MARCH 2, ARMENPRESS: The government will release 250 million
drams from the 2009 state budget for the construction of 1.7 km
bypassing road on the Meghri-Goris sector of Meghri-Yerevan inter
state highway. This sector of the highway has entirely been damaged
as a result of the landslides and became impassable for the traffic.

Head of the transport department of the governor’s office Sarik
Aghabekian told Armenpress that a tender has been announced among
the construction organizations which will be held on March 9, and
the works will kick off from April. During the whole process of the
construction the highway will be passable.

Robert Wexler: Turkey-Armenia relations at historic point

Robert Wexler: Turkey-Armenia relations at historic point

armradio.am
28.02.2009 17:05

The relations between Turkey and Armenia are at a historic turning
point and the developments could result in the opening of the border
between the two neighboring countries, a U.S. congressman said late on
Friday.

Robert Wexler told the U.S. Foreign Affairs Committee it seemed
relations between Turkey and Armenia were at a point of historic
opportunity, adding the relations could be normalized and border gates
between Turkey and Armenia could be opened, Hurriyet Daily reported.

Wexler, co-chair of the Turkish friendship group in the U.S. House of
Representatives, paid a visit to Turkey and held a series of talks with
high-level officials last week.

Turkey’s Army Hints At Prosecuting Deputy Over Kurdish Speech

TURKEY’S ARMY HINTS AT PROSECUTING DEPUTY OVER KURDISH SPEECH

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.02.2009 19:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkey’s powerful military suggested on Friday that
prosecutors should take action against a Kurdish politician who broke
the law by delivering a speech in the Kurdish language in parliament.

Kurds have long suffered official discrimination, including a ban
on the public use of their language. In 1991, Leyla Zana, a Kurdish
politician, caused uproar in parliament when she attempted to take
her oath in Kurdish. Her immunity was stripped and she served 10
years in prison on other charges.

On Tuesday, Turkey’s state television cut off live broadcasting when
another politician, Ahmet Turk, addressed members of his Democratic
Society Party (DTP) in Kurdish.

The ruling AK Party and nationalists have called Turk’s speech a
"provocation". On Friday, the military, which has a long history of
intervening in Turkish politics and is fighting PKK militants in the
south-east, weighed in.

"Turkey is a country with a rule of law. Everybody has to act in line
with the constitution and its laws. It is natural for the judiciary to
take steps against those who exceed the boundaries of the law," General
Metin Gurak, a military spokesman, told a weekly news conference.

As a member of parliament, Turk has immunity from
prosecution. Parliament would have to strip him of this before he
could face any court case. Parliament Speaker Koksal Toptan has said
he did not plan to open a disciplinary case.

The DTP, which has 21 members in parliament, faces closure by the
Constitutional Court on charges it has links to the PKK.

Analysts have said Turk’s speech was aimed at voters. Turkey holds
municipal elections on March 29, and Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan’s
AK Party is aggressively campaigning to win votes from the DTP in
the Kurdish southeast of the country.

Erdogan has won the respect of many Kurds by using Kurdish words in
rallies, and the launch of a Kurdish state channel in January was
seen as a breakthrough in expanding Kurdish rights, Reuters reported.

Israel Has High Hopes For Turkey

ISRAEL HAS HIGH HOPES FOR TURKEY

press tv
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:35:24 GMT

Ambassador Gaby Levy says Turkey is an important partner of Israel.

An Israeli official says Tel Aviv has placed great importance on its
relations with Ankara, hoping the recent row would soon come to an end.

The Israeli ambassador to Turkey, Gaby Levy, on Wednesday told the
Turkish newspaper Aksam that Israel has realized the importance of
Turkey in the wake of recent tensions.

The Tel Aviv-Ankara relations deteriorated after Turkish Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan criticized Israeli President Shimon Peres at the
World Economic Forum in Davos, Swiss, over the conduct of an Israeli
military campaign in Gaza.

Levy said military ties as well as the condition of Jewish people in
Turkey have rendered the country extremely important.

"I can mention two main reasons… Turkey is part of our
culture. Turkey is also one the only two countries in the world
that are nicely hosting the Jews," said Levy without naming the
other country.

"The second reason is that we have strong military and defense ties
with Turkey. We have intelligence partnership. There are many Jewish
technicians in the Turkish army," the Israeli ambassador continued.

Levy added that the recent crisis would be resolved just like the
previous ones were dissolved, Press TV correspondent Mehdi Gholizadeh
reported.

The tensions skyrocketed after the Turkish Fo reign Ministry summoned
the Israeli ambassador earlier this month to protest comments made
by an Israeli army general about Premier Erdogan.

General Avi Mizrahi, the commander of Israel’s ground forces, had
said Erdogan should have "looked in the mirror" before lashing out
at President Peres in Davos.

He has also accused Turkish prime minister of massacring the Armenians
and suppressing the Kurdish minority in the country.

WB Supports Operations To Mitigate The Impacts Of The Global Economi

WB SUPPORTS OPERATIONS TO MITIGATE THE IMPACTS OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS ON ARMENIA
Shakeh Avoyan

"Radiolur"
25.02.2009 15:20

The World Bank approved a package of four operations, for a total
amount of US$85 million, to help Armenia mitigate the impacts of
the global economic crisis, Head of the World Bank Yerevan Office
Aristmene Varoudakis told reporters today.

Three of the operations — the Lifeline Roads Improvement Project
(US$25 million), the Additional Financing for the Social Investment
Fund (US$8 million), and the Additional Financing for the Rural
Enterprise and Small Scale Commercial Agriculture Development Project
(US$2 million) — were processed under the International Development
Association (IDA) financial crisis response Fast Track Facility, which
will help Armenia mitigate the impacts of global economic crisis on
the country’s economy and the well-being of its population.

The fourth operation – Access to Finance for Small and Medium
Enterprises Project (US$50 million) – is provided through the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) to support
local businesses in the current environment, and is the first IBRD
loan to Armenia.

The Bank’s ability to provide this support in a timely manner has been
made possible by Armenia’s strong foundation of implementation capacity
and policy reform momentum, and by the flexibility provided through
the IDA Fast Track=2 0Facility and Armenia’s eligibility for IBRD
financing. These operations build upon previous work in these sectors
by the World Bank and other donors, through both lending operations
and technical assistance. In many instances, these operations build
upon existing implementation and institutional arrangements that have
good performance records.

"These projects will support urgent local works that can be implemented
largely over this year, to provide immediate employment opportunities,"
said Asad Alam, Regional Director for the World Bank’s South Caucasus
Country Department. "They will also help strengthen infrastructure
connectivity particularly in rural areas, meet business needs, and
upgrade social infrastructure that will foster medium-term growth
and improvement in living standards."

The Lifeline Roads Improvement Project will support rehabilitation
of approximately 100 km of rural roads, connecting local communities
with main roads and generating about 200,000 job-days of employment
for Armenia works.

The Social Investment Fund financing will support small-scale
investments in 55 of the poorest communities of Armenia, through
basic small-scale social and economic infrastructure rehabilitation,
and will generate short-term employment of up to 86,000 job-days. The
Rural Enterprise and Small Scale Commercial Agriculture Development
financing will complete 35 community-focused economic development
projects and extend additional support to five20to seven new
communities. The three Fast Track credits are provided on IDA terms,
with a maturity of 20 years, including a grace period of 10 years.

The Access to Finance for Small and Medium Enterprises operation
is the first IBRD loan to Armenia, and will provide financing to
domestic banks for on-lending to the small and medium enterprise
sector, thereby supporting investment and employment generation and
improving the resiliency of Armenia’s private and financial sectors in
the face of the global economic crisis. The credit line will support
SME development through a difficult period, when these businesses are
facing increasing challenges in raising finance through the banking
system or via remittances. Under the loan, the Central Bank of Armenia
(CBA) will enter into subsidiary loan agreements with eligible banks
for on-lending funds to enterprises at market rates. The initial
ceiling on individual sub-loans is set at US$150,000. The IBRD loan
is provided with a maturity of 26.5 years, including a 5-year grace
period.

Since Armenia joined the World Bank in 1992, commitments to Armenia
have totaled approximately US$ 1,162 million. There are currently
16 projects under implementation with an undisbursed amount of about
$94 million.

Armenia Must Never Renounce Its Territorial Claims For Turkey

ARMENIA MUST NEVER RENOUNCE ITS TERRITORIAL CLAIMS FOR TURKEY

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.02.2009 17:21 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Official Yerevan’s relationship with Ankara is
one of the key directions in Armenia’s foreign policy, an Armenian
expert said.

"Unfortunately, during past 15 years the Armenia failed to work
out a specific strategy of relations with Turkey," Armen Aivazyan,
Director of Ararat Center of Strategic Studies, told a news conference
on Tuesday.

"Turkey continues with its anti-Armenian propaganda and is waging a war
against Armenia using non-traditional weapons: economic, political,
moral and legislative. Meanwhile, Armenia lays one claim: opening
of the border and establishment of diplomatic relations without
preconditions," he said.

This is a wrong approach, according to the expert.

"Football diplomacy only created a background for normalization
of relations with Turkey, yet Yerevan hasn’t assumed any specific
position on Ankara. The problems between the countries can’t be
resolved through meetings only," Aivazyan said.

He added that up to now the football initiative of the Armenian
President did not lead to any perceptible results.

"Armenia must never renounce its territorial claims to Turkey,"
Aivazyan emphasized.

As to the opening of the Armenian-Turkish border, the expert noted
that it could seriously harm Armenian economy which is too brittle
yet to resist the deluge of Turkish goods.

Armenia, Egypt Interested In Deepening Bilateral Cooperation

ARMENIA, EGYPT INTERESTED IN DEEPENING BILATERAL COOPERATION

armradio.am
24.02.2009 11:33

Within the framework of the visit to Egypt, the Foreign Minister of
Armenia, Edward Nalbandian, had a meeting with the Prime Minister of
Egypt, Ahmad Nazif.

Greeting the Armenian Foreign Minister, the Prime Minister said the
people of Egypt have the warmest feelings and sympathy for Armenia and
the Armenian nation. Ahmad Nazif underlined that a vivid example of
Armenian-Egyptian friendship is the active role the Egyptian-Armenian
community plays in different spheres of the country’s life. According
to Prime Minister Ahmad Nazif, the friendly relations between the
two peoples provide a good basis for further deepening of cooperation
between Armenia and Egypt.

The Foreign Minister of Armenia said, in turn, that the
Armenian-Egyptian relations have a history of centuries and our
peoples are tied with traditional friendship. According to Minister
Nalbandian’s assessment, all this creates a good basis for deepening
of effective cooperation between the states. Armenia is interested in
reinforcing and deepening the bilateral cooperation with Egypt. The
Foreign Minister noted that it is necessary to reinforce the high
level of the political dialogue between the two countries with
bilateral projects and effective utilization of the opportunities
for the development of trade-economic relations.

Foreign Mnister To Receive Peter Semneby

FOREIGN MINISTER TO RECEIVE PETER SEMNEBI

Panorama.am
Feb 19, 2009

The Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandyan received the
special representative of the European Union to the Southern Caucasus
Peter Semnebi, reports the press and information department of
the Ministry. According to the source, the Minister mentioned that
Armenia-European Union relations are being developed both in bilateral
and wide formats.

The officials have also discussed "Eastern Partnership" project
which probably would give more opportunity to collaborate with the
European countries.