Dems To Press Ahead With Genocide Bill

DEMS TO PRESS AHEAD WITH GENOCIDE BILL

Gulf Times, Qatar
Oct 16 2007

WASHINGTON: Top US Democrats on Sunday vowed to press ahead with a
bill condemning the mass killing of Armenians decades ago as genocide,
brushing off Turkish fury over the sensitive issue.

House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said possible
reprisals affecting Turkey’s co-operation with the US military were
"hypothetical" and would not derail the resolution.

Holding a vote on condemning the massacre, even many years after the
fact, is "about who we are as a country," Pelosi told ABC television.

"Genocide still exists, and we saw it in Rwanda; we see it now in
Darfur," she said on ABC television after the House foreign affairs
committee last week branded the Ottoman Empire’s World War I massacre
of Armenians a genocide.

But the White House warned on Sunday that the bill could bring "grave
harm" to the already strained relations between Washington and Ankara.

"We regret that the Speaker Pelosi is intent on bringing this
resolution for a vote despite the strong concerns expressed by foreign
policy and defence experts … and our Turkish allies," said White
House spokesman Tony Fratto.

"We continue to strongly oppose this resolution which may do grave
harm to US-Turkish relations and to US interests in Europe and the
Middle East."

The non-binding resolution, he said, "will not improve Turkish-Armenian
relations or advance reconciliation among Turks and Armenians over
the terrible events of 1915."

Armenians say at least 1.5mn of their people were killed from 1915
to 1917 under what they describe as an campaign of deportation and
murder by the Ottoman Empire. Turkey bitterly disputes the number of
dead and the characterisation of the killings as a genocide.

The bill is likely to come up in the full House of Representatives in
November. Although the resolution is only symbolic, Turkey recalled
its ambassador to Washington last week and has called off visits to
the US by at least two of its officials.

The angry reaction has fueled fears within the US administration
that it could lose access to a military base in Turkey, a Nato ally,
which provides a crucial staging ground for US supplies headed to
Iraq and Afghanistan.

Two top US officials, one each from the state and defence departments,
are now in Turkey to try to cool the diplomatic row.

"We are certainly working to try to minimise any concrete steps
the government might take (such as) restricting the movement of
our troops," US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Saturday
in Moscow.

Rice and Defence Secretary Robert Gates lobbied hard against the
genocide resolution, and the administration says it will keep up its
effort to forestall a vote in the full House.

US-Turkish military ties "will never be the same again" if the House
confirms the committee vote, Turkey’s military chief General Yasar
Buyukanit told the daily Milliyet on Sunday.

House Democratic leader Steny Hoyer said he had repeatedly raised
the killings of Armenians with Turkish political and military leaders
during his 26 years in Congress.

70,000 Illegal Armenians Living And Working In Turkey

70,000 ILLEGAL ARMENIANS LIVING AND WORKING IN TURKEY

The Van Der Galiën Gazette, Netherlands
Oct 16 2007

It’s great to see articles such as "Armenians Who Need Help
Today" in the American press. Mr Fred Hiatt writes: The heads of
both U.S. organizations told me that their groups have worked,
sometimes quietly, to promote human rights and civil society in
Armenia. Undoubtedly their influence would be limited, no matter how
hard they tried.

But what if they had tried as fervently as they did to win Wednesday’s
vote? It’s hard not to think that 3 million Armenians might be less
poor and more free than they are today.

On the same note, in one of my earlier posts I had written: The
Diaspora Armenians should concentrate on helping their own country
instead of spending millions of dollars to get recognition for a
wartime tragedy to be accepted as genocide which allegedly took place
nearly 100 years ago.

Today Armenians from motherland are so poor, they are forced to look
for jobs elsewhere in order to be able to feed their family.

It is estimated that 70,000 Armenians from mainland Armenia, are
living and working illegally in Turkey today. These people must not
be confused with the Turkish-Armenians who were born in Turkey. While
Turkish authorities are much stricter on other nationalities such as
Moldovians, Uzbekis etc who also work illegally in Turkey in great
numbers, they have been much more tolerant towards the Armenians.

I have many friends who employ Armenians. One friend’s 82 year old
uncle in Istanbul has an Armenian woman in her 50’s taking care of him
for the past 7 years. He pays her about $500 a month, she sleeps in
the same house, she cooks what he buys and eats with him. His uncle
is extremely happy to have her and she is extremely grateful to have
a job. She finally told my friend this year, with enough Turkish she
has learned, that all of the other Armenians working in same type of
jobs, did not care for the passage of the Genocide Resolution. She
said "I am working kacak (illegallly) here and all the money I earn,
I am sending it to Armenia to my 2 sons who are working in Russia for
low wages, because there is nothing in Armenia." She said, about 7
years ago her husband suddenly died and she had nothing to live on,
so she slipped into Turkey, came to Istanbul and found a job that
she was grateful for. She was genuinely wondering about what would
become of her if the Resolution is passed, and the Turkish Government
started cracking down on these 70,000 illegal Armenians in Turkey.

This is the story of one Armenian Citizen in Turkey. Multiply this
70,000 times and you will realize what kind of financial damage will
be caused to Armenia, if the Turkish Government chooses to crack down.

And this is just one of the many reasons why passage of a much
politicized Resolution is not only untimely but also unnecessary.

/70000-illegal-armenians-living-and-working-in-tur key/

–Boundary_(ID_I2Q089hzkvV34oInH0ykKA)–

http://mvdg.wordpress.com/2007/10/16

He Came, He Congratulated, He Went

HE CAME, HE CONGRATULATED, HE WENT
Lilit Poghosyan

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
Oct 16 2007
Armenia

Thus, as one of the newspapers belonging to Armenian Pan National
Movement joyfully reported recently, ex-President Levon Ter-Petrosyan
over again "shook" Armenian world, by visiting Stepanakert, where he
was evidently not expected.

Referring to the "well informed" sources, one of the newspapers even
"communicated good news" reporting that Levon Ter-Petrosyan "gave
a piece of friendly advice" to NKR President, not to interfere in
Armenia’s internal political affairs and not to support one candidate
and conduct black PR against another candidate. As compensation he
"promised" not to relieve him of his office, in case he is elected. How
should we understand this exotic thesis?

At our request NKR high-ranking officials and representatives of
different political powers touched upon this issue concerned.

NA Vice-Speaker Rudik Hyusnunts

"Frankly, I don’t posses such information. But in my view the statement
is not correct as it is. Nagorno Karabakh is a sovereign country and
Bako Sahakyan is a President of a sovereign country and no one is
competent to interfere in our internal affairs."

"With whom did the ex-President meet besides Bako Sahakyan?"

" As far as I know he didn’t meet with anyone. And the meeting with
NKR President was of a pure protocol character. Levon Ter-Petrosyan
has simply congratulated Bako Sahakyan on the occasion of his election
as a President."

" But the "well informed" sources report Levon Ter-Petrosyan has
received a cordial meeting in Stepanakert."

" In my view it is a political PR. I repeat the meeting was of a
protocol character. Anyone can come and congratulate NKR President,
including Armenia’s first President."

"Did Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s visit raise a wave of interest and hot
discussions in Artsak?"

" I wouldn’t say so. I even think that 98% of Karabakh population
didn’t even know about this visit."

Head of the Chief Information Department of the Presidential Staff
David Babayan

Levon Ter-Petrosyan came to congratulate Bako Sahakyan on the
occasion of his election as a President. This was the essence of their
conversation, as reported in the official information. All the other
rumors are senseless, in my opinion. Most probably the newspapers
deliver this information. Regarding your question, it is NKR people
that elect the President of Karabakh and it is their right to allow
or not to allow him to remain in his office."

"Did the ex-President have other meetings in Stepanakert?"

"No. On his way he had one meeting with the people. I don’t posses
any information about his other meetings."

Adviser to the President Vitaly Balasanyan "No one has the right to
allow or not to allow NKR President to remain in his office. Karabakh
is not Armenian province. It is a Republic with a proclaimed and
confirmed independence."

"Was Ter-Petrosyan’s visit a surprise for you or it was expected?"

"Why should it be a surprise? Everyone came to congratulate Bako
Sahakyan, including the first President. I don’t see anything
extraordinary in it."

Leader of "Azat Hayrenik" party Arthur Tovmasyan

"I don’t think it is up to Armenia to decide who will be NKR
President or visa verse, that it depends on Karabakh who will win the
Presidential elections in Armenia. 85% of the population of Nagorno
Karabakh voted for Bako Sahakyan. It is a weighty percentage and in
my view any newly elected President of Armenia must consider Karabakh
elections.

As for the visit of Armenia’s first President he simply came to
congratulate NKR President on the occasion of his election.

We respect and welcome any election of Armenian people, no matter
who the people will support. We have never interfered in Armenia’s
internal political processes and we are ready to cooperate with the
candidate who will obtain the people’s vote of confidence."

"Is it all the same to you who will win RA presidential elections,
after hearing Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s forgotten slogan " you will not
live in welfare until Karabakh issue is "solved"?"

" Of course no. Anyhow it is up to the people of Armenia to
decide. Though judging from the results of the parliamentary elections
and the results of sociological surveys Serge Sargsyan has no real
alternative for the forthcoming Presidential elections. We don’t think
anyone except RA Prime Minister Serge Sargsyan can pretend to be the
future President of Armenia, including Levon Ter Petrosyan."

Adam Schiff: Genocide Denial Is A "Double Killing"

ADAM SCHIFF: GENOCIDE DENIAL IS A "DOUBLE KILLING"

armradio.am
16.10.2007 16:44

"Last week, the House Foreign Affairs Committee approved a resolution
commemorating the Armenian genocide. As the principal author of the
measure and one of more than 225 sponsors, I was deeply disappointed
by The Post’s editorial in opposition to the bill," Rep. Adam Schiff
wrote in a letter to the Washington Post.

"That the deliberate murder of 1.5 million Armenians between 1915 and
1923 constitutes genocide is almost universally accepted by historians
and is chronicled in great detail in our National Archives. This
wound festers because Turkey refuses to acknowledge the crimes of
its Ottoman forebears.

As Elie Wiesel has said, genocide denial is a "double killing": It
murders the dignity of the survivors and seeks to destroy remembrance
of the crime," Schiff wrote.

"How can a newspaper assert that recognizing the murder of 1.5 million
is somehow ‘petty’?" he said.

Armenia, Georgia Should Be Presented As Joint Investment, Trade Area

ARMENIA, GEORGIA SHOULD BE PRESENTED AS JOINT INVESTMENT, TRADE AREA

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 15 2007

YEREVAN, October 15. /ARKA/. Armenia and Georgia should be presented as
a joint investment and trade area, the Prime-Minister of Georgia Zurab
Nogaideli told journalists in Yerevan after the 6th sitting of the
Armenian-Georgian intergovernmental commission on economic cooperation.

He pointed out that Armenia and Georgia have practically completed the
stage of sorting out the problems, particularly in the economic field.

According to him, currently the sides gradually pass on to more
efficient use of the existing potential. "We have already started to
work on ensuring that Armenia and Georgia are introduced to investors
and to those who want working with us in a joint investment and trade
area. These are not mere words," Nogaideli said.

In his turn, the Prime-Minister of Armenia Serge Sargsian said
that the format of the joint work is satisfactory as the sides
succeeded in turning to the next level now. If earlier the stability
of the deliveries of Armenian cargoes via Georgia was discussed,
"currently deeper issues important for both of the peoples are under
consideration with the issue on formation of joint market being one
of them", Armenia’s Prime-Minister said.

"Armenia and Georgia separately are a small market each, but together
we can be of interest to major companies. There is also another
problem: the products produced in Georgia are not produced in Armenia
and vice versa. Thus we are not competitors and can supplement each
other in the shortcomings of mutual markets," Sargsian said.

The 6th sitting of the Armenian-Georgian intergovernmental commission
on economic cooperation was held Monday in Yerevan. As a result,
the following documents were signed: the protocol of the sitting and
two documents on cooperation in the customs fields, particularly in
exchange of customs statistical information and administrative mutual
assistance on customs issues.

Armenia’s foreign trade turnover with Georgia increased 41.5%
and totaled $81mln in January-August 2007. Exports from Armenia to
Georgia reached $55.6mln in the period – a 57% increase compared
with January-August 2006. Armenia’s imports of Georgian-make goods
totaled $25.4mln over the period – a 16.4% increase. The imports from
Georgia’s territory reached $74.4mln (1.7-time increase).

Turkish Military Shells Northern Iraq & Amasses 60,000 Troops On Bor

TURKISH MILITARY SHELLS NORTHERN IRAQ & AMASSES 60,000 TROOPS ON BORDER AS U.S.-TURKEY RELATIONS DETERIORATE OVER HOUSE VOTE ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Democracy Now, NY
0/15/1351243
Oct 15 2007

Turkey’s top general warned this weekend that US-Turkey relations
would "never be the same again" if the United States House votes to
declare the World War I-era mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians a
genocide. Despite President Bush’s plea, the House Foreign Affairs
Committee voted 27-21 Wednesday to call the killing of Armenians
by Ottoman Turks "systematic," "deliberate," and amounting to
"genocide." [includes rush transcript]

The Turkish military has stepped up attacks against what it says
are Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, bases in northern Iraq. The
shelling comes just ahead of a vote in the Turkish Parliament on a bill
authorizing a ground incursion against Kurdish fighters in Iraq. The
military has reportedly amassed 60,000 troops along its border with
Iraq. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Turkey to refrain
from any major military operation. But Washington’s influence over
Turkey appears to be waning.

Turkey’s top general warned this weekend that US-Turkey relations
would "never be the same again" if the United States House votes to
declare the World War I-era mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians a
genocide. Despite President Bush’s plea, the House Foreign Affairs
committee voted 27-21 Wednesday to call the killing of Armenians
by Ottoman Turks "systematic," "deliberate," and amounting to
"genocide." Turkey recalled its ambassador to Washington last week.

Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman visited Ankara on Saturday
in an attempt to improve worsening ties. He apologized for the House
Committee vote on behalf of the Bush administration.

Eric Edelman For the Bush administration the stakes of alienating
Turkey are high.

Turkey is a major cargo hub for U.S. and allied military forces in
Iraq and Afghanistan. About 70 percent of U.S. air cargo and one-third
of the fuel headed for Iraq goes through Turkey.

US defense Secretary Robert Gates, speaking in London on Thursday,
highlighted the close relationship between Turkey and the United
States.

Robert Gates To discuss this, we are now joined by two guests who
have been closely following these issues. Zanku Armenian is on the
Board of Directors of the Armenian National Committee of America. He
joins us from Los Angeles, California. Arman Artuc is the editor of
a webzine for Armenians in Turkey. He joins us here in the firehouse
studio in New York.

Zanku Armenian, serves on the Board of Directors of the Armenian
National Committee of America. He is also a founder and co-chair of
the Armenian American Democratic Leadership Council.

Arman Artuc, Armenian from Turkey. He is the editor of an online
Armenian website, hyetert.com and is a graduate student in New York.

————

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help
us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our
TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.

Donate – $25, $50, $100, more…

AMY GOODMAN: The Turkish military has stepped up attacks against what
it says are Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, bases in northern Iraq.

The shelling comes just ahead of a vote in the Turkish parliament
on a bill authorizing a ground invasion against Kurdish fighters in
Iraq. The military has reportedly amassed 60,000 troops along its
border with Iraq. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Turkey to
refrain from any major military operation, but Washington’s influence
over Turkey appears to be waning.

Turkey’s top general warned this weekend US-Turkey relations will
"never be the same again" if the US House of Representatives votes
to declare the World War I-era mass killings of 1.5 million Armenians
a genocide. Despite President Bush’s plea, the House Foreign Affairs
Committee voted 27-21 Wednesday to call the killing of Armenians by
Ottoman Turks "systematic," "deliberate" and amounting to "genocide."

Turkey recalled its ambassador to Washington last week.

US Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman visited Ankara Saturday
in an attempt to improve worsening ties. He apologized for the House
committee vote on behalf of the Bush administration.

ERIC EDELMAN: […] at the action that was taken by the House Foreign
Affairs Committee in voting HR-106, the resolution that came out
of committee, they asked us to convey to our Turkish colleagues
the determination of the administration to continue to oppose
this resolution and to try and prevent its passage. We had a good
and constructive discussion in which our colleagues expressed the
disappointment and the hurt of both the government of Turkey and the
Turkish public.

AMY GOODMAN: For the Bush administration, the stakes of alienating
Turkey are high. Turkey is a major cargo hub for US and allied military
forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. About 70% of US air cargo and one-third
of the fuel headed for Iraq goes through Turkey.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, speaking in London Thursday,
highlighted the close relationship between Turkey and the US.

ROBERT GATES: I think we all recognize there were mass murders
ninety-five years ago, 1915. The problem that we have is that this is
clearly a very sensitive subject for one of our closest allies and
an ally that is incredibly important to the United States in terms
of our operations in Iraq.

AMY GOODMAN: We’re joined right now by two guests who have been closely
following these issues. Zanku Armenian is on the board of directors
of the Armenian National Committee of America, joining us from Los
Angeles, California. And Arman Artuc is the editor of a webzine for
Armenians in Turkey. He joins us here in the firehouse studio in New
York. We welcome you both to Democracy Now!

Zanku Armenian, let’s begin with you. What happened in 1915?

ZANKU ARMENIAN: In 1915, the Ottoman Turkish government began a policy
— implementing a policy of mass extermination and deportations in
order to solve what they viewed as the Armenian problem in the eastern
provinces of Turkey under the cover of World War I, and 1.5 million
Armenians were exterminated in that process, as they were killed,
raped, and driven and deported south through the Syrian deserts.

AMY GOODMAN: And what has been the acknowledgement of this by the
Turkish government since that time? We’re talking about, well, almost
a century later.

ZANKU ARMENIAN: Well, Amy, that’s a good question, because that’s
exactly what makes it a current issue. The successive Turkish
governments and the Republic of Turkey, separate from the Ottoman
Turkish government, have, instead of coming to terms with this
history, acknowledging this history, have instead chosen to spend
millions of dollars with public relations firms and lobbying firms
in a desperate attempt to deny that this part of history, their
history, ever happened. And it’s unfortunate because that is what
has held Turkey back through the decades, and increasingly they have
become isolated on this issue, because there are dozens of countries,
including eight countries in Europe, who have acknowledged the facts
of this history, including the United States’s records that show
that this is a documented fact. And, unfortunately, Turkey continues,
instead, to spend its effort and energy in a desperate denial campaign.

AMY GOODMAN: Why is the House voting now? What was the spark for the
Foreign Relations Committee?

ZANKU ARMENIAN: Well, there has been a growing demand within the
country, a grassroots effort throughout the country, to ask the
United States Congress to reaffirm our record on the genocide,
which is very clear, and also calling upon the President to make
sure that our foreign policy reflects the appropriate sensitivity
towards human rights and issues having to do with genocide. And so,
part of the purpose of this resolution is to acknowledge the past
history and acknowledge the important role that the United States has
played in this issue, as well as kind of realigning our foreign policy
into a more credible position, as opposed to pandering to the Turkish
government’s denial campaign and actually facilitating that. We should
be playing a leadership role as a country with our values, American
values of democracy and human rights, and encouraging the Turkish
government to say that your policy of denial is really a false —
is not in the interest of the Turkish people in the long run.

AMY GOODMAN: The official Turkish position also highlights the number
of Turks who were killed after 1915. This is what the recalled Turkish
ambassador to the United States, Nabi Sensoy, said last week.

NABI SENSOY: People think that it is only the Armenian who perished
during the events of 1915. They keep forgetting that hundreds of
thousands of Turks also perished during the same events in the hands
of the Armenians. And if you look at this resolution, you will see
that this is a very one-sided resolution. It makes no mention of the
pains of the Turkish side or the deaths of the Turks, as well.

AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to turn right now to our second guest in studio;
we’re joined by Arman Artuc, who is the editor of the online Armenian
website hyetert.com How do you pronounce it?

ARMAN ARTUC: Hyetert.

AMY GOODMAN: And what does that mean?

ARMAN ARTUC: Well, it’s, you know, the Armenian words Armenian and
newspaper, so it’s Armenian newspaper.

AMY GOODMAN: Do you believe there was a genocide in 1915? And you,
yourself, are Armenian.

ARMAN ARTUC: Yeah, well, I mean, my belief, on one part, however,
I’m — being a Turkish citizen, you cannot basically, you know, in
a lawful fashion acknowledge the genocide. And so, as it happened to
the murdered journalist Hrant Dink just recently, who was prosecuted
about this, and the charges were dropped after his murder. However,
his son, who reprinted his father’s acknowledgment of the genocide in
the newspaper Agos, was just convicted, actually the day after the
bill passed the Foreign Affairs Committee, from the Article 301 of
the Turkish Criminal Law, which says "insulting Turkishness." It’s
a very broad and actually vague term used for that particular article.

So even if, you know, personally speaking, I recognize the Armenian
Genocide, it will be unlawful for me to say that it was a genocide.

AMY GOODMAN: Why?

ARMAN ARTUC: Because of this law. So they can persecute me in the
same manner.

AMY GOODMAN: Why is it such a threat to Turkey today, almost a hundred
years later?

ARMAN ARTUC: I think we have to understand how polarized Turkey is on
different issues, not just on the Armenian issue, so this polarization
just recently actually was, you know, in place, especially regarding
to the Islam and the secularism and how the country should, you know,
find its own path, etc., which then was, you know, say, salted and
peppered with what had happened in the Kurdish region recently. And
on top of all this, now we have this bill that’s passing through the,
first, Foreign Affairs Committee and now coming to the House. So these
all are polarizing issues for Turkey, so the country is divided in
different terms.

Yet there are some intellectuals in Turkey which now recognize —
intellectuals and scholars, I should say, that recognize the Armenian
Genocide and what had happened to the Armenians at the time. However,
there are actually two issues. One is the ethical issue, where we
can actually say that the Turkish governments and all the Turkish
governments in the republic in Europe basically do not recognize
what had happened to the Armenians at the time. There is a constant
denial of the murders and the killings and the deaths at the time,
what had happened in 1915. Leave apart the word "genocide" for a
second; Turkey did not recognize this piece yet. So I think —

AMY GOODMAN: Did not recognize…?

ARMAN ARTUC: The murders, the perpetrations of 1915. So I think
we still have a long way in Turkey to come to a point where Turkey
actually recognizes the genocide. Yet, there are different reactions
from Turkey, and I think we’ll see — I mean, this is not the first
bill that was introduced in the House. There was one seven or eight
years ago, and there are others in different countries all over
the world.

AMY GOODMAN: Explain what happened seven or eight years ago.

ARMAN ARTUC: Well, actually, there was a similar bill that came to
the — was coming to the House, but then Dennis Hastert, I think,
was just — at the last moment did not bring it to the House. Well,
there are different conspiracies about what had actually happened. The
official line goes in Turkey that Bill Clinton at the time gave him a
phone call, and then after that they never brought it to the House,
with similar concerns that Turkey is biggest ally of US, military
issues, I think other financial issues, etc.

AMY GOODMAN: So Bill Clinton took the same role as President Bush.

ARMAN ARTUC: Exactly, exactly. That was what had happened in, you know,
2000 or 2001.

AMY GOODMAN: And Dennis Hastert, at the time head of the House of
Representatives?

ARMAN ARTUC: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: There’s a controversy about his involvement with or the
influence of Turkish interests on him.

ARMAN ARTUC: Well, controversy or conspiracy or something. I don’t
want to call it anything, because I don’t think anyone actually knows
the details about it fully, to full extent.

But, well, you know, I can talk about how — the reactions in Turkey
for this issue, the most recent bill, and I can say that Turkey will
react this way, where you see, you know, like they hold the ambassador
back, and then they threaten, you know, taking some other military
action, etc. However, if you think about it in the long run, it’s only,
you know — I mean, I, myself, am not a big believer of such bills
in the parliaments of these countries or other countries other than
Turkey. However, at the same time we should understand that in the
long run these bills are the ones that’s actually forcing Turkey to
act on this Armenian issue, because it was through these bills that
the government, that the current government, is taking some measures.

Well, there’s one interesting measure, which I can’t — I’m not in
the same position with it. However, you know, they are just coming up
with new positions, like the recent one where the head of the current
Turkish government, Prime Minister Erdogan, just basically offered
committees from both sides to create a committee of historians from
both sides — Armenia and Turkey — to discuss this issue. Yet there
had been ninety years, there had been lots of works on this issue,
and I think, you know, the rest of the world actually knows what had
happened. So this was a desperate attempt. However, it was an attempt,
and I think that’s interesting.

AMY GOODMAN: What is the response of the Turkish people? I mean,
I remember when Hrant Dink was gunned down in front of his offices,
the Armenian Turkish newspaper editor. The people wore T-shirts that
said, "We Are All Hrant Dink," not just Armenian.

ARMAN ARTUC: Yeah. Well, they weren’t just Armenians. You’re right.

Actually, there were like 50,000 — some people claimed it was 100,000
— people that marched that day after the murder of Hrant Dink. And
I think the Armenian community in Istanbul welcomed this.

However, just, you know, after the aftermath of the killing, we saw
that the photographs of the murder, shot with the security forces
at the time, was in all the media, in all the newspapers. And right
after that, especially after these recent killings by the Kurdish,
well, militant guerrilla group, the Kurdish Laborers Party —
the slogan on the T-shirts was at the time, "We Are All Hrant" —
now they are actually using it in a way, "We Are All Mehmet," where
Mehmet is this, you know, like it’s the John Doe of Turkey, that,
you know, people are trying to sort of create this reaction to those
people who marched at the time of Hrant Dink’s murder, saying that,
"Well, you guys just marched for this Armenian journalist who insulted
Turkishness, but now we are having all these deaths. Our soldiers
are dying, and you guys are not doing anything at all."

AMY GOODMAN: Zanku Armenian, what about the Turkish parliament voting
to authorize an invasion of northern Iraq? What does this mean?

ZANKU ARMENIAN: Well, it’s very unfortunate that Turkey would behave
this way, because, you know, as the general said today, claiming
that the United States, you know, is behaving in a way that is not
a good way in terms of being a responsible ally, a good ally, well,
I would turn that back around: why is the Turkish government behaving
more radically, as almost like a radical Islamic state, versus being
the NATO ally that it purports to be? Part of this is also creating
a fait accompli on the ground. Turkey wants to create these sorts
of tensions in order to — almost as if throwing a temper tantrum
in reaction to a bill, such as the House resolution, which is in
essence just an expression, a sense of Congress. It is a nonbinding
resolution. It does not force the President to do anything specific
other than calling upon the President to make sure that our foreign
policy reflects the appropriate sensitivity toward these issues of
genocide. And unfortunately, the Turkish government, through these
actions, is also, in essence, trying to blackmail the United States
into curtailing our own freedom of speech on this issue. Why is the
United States Congress not going to be allowed to speak about this
issue? Why is the Turkish government trying to export Article 301
into the United States by putting a gag order on our Congress to
express its sense, its opinion, on this issue?

AMY GOODMAN: How significant is Turkey for the US war with Iraq
and Afghanistan?

ZANKU ARMENIAN: Well, Turkey, as a NATO ally, does have an important
role to play in making sure that there is stability in the region.

But I guess a question I would ask is, how much of an — you know,
what kind of a responsible ally does this sort of thing, where it
would try to invade the northern part of Iraq, which is the only
stable part of Iraq at the current time, and trying to create more
fronts for our forces in Iraq? This is not the behavior we should
expect from an ally of the United States.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you both for being with us: Zanku
Armenian, on the board of directors of the Armenian National Committee
of America, co-founder and co-chair of Armenian American Democratic
Leadership Council; and Arman Artuc, an Armenian from Turkey, is the
editor of an Armenian website.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/1

Turkish General Says Too Early to Speak on Iraq Move

The New York Times
October 15, 2007

Turkish General Says Too Early to Speak on Iraq Move

By REUTERS

Filed at 10:07 a.m. ET

ANKARA (Reuters) – A top Turkish general said on Monday it was too
early to discuss the exact timing or scale of a possible operation
against Kurdish rebels in northern Iraq, for which parliament’s
approval will be sought this week.

Faced with an escalation in Kurdish separatist violence, Turkey’s
government plans to request authorization from parliament this week
for a cross-border operation into Iraq.

The United States fears a major incursion to crush Kurdistan Workers
Party (PKK) guerrillas using the area to launch attacks into Turkey
could destabilize the only relatively peaceful area of Iraq, and
potentially the wider region.

"If this duty (Iraqi incursion) is assigned to us, we will look at the
scale on which it will be carried out. It is not possible to say this
right now," deputy chief of General Staff, General Ergin Saygun told
reporters.

Ankara is a crucial NATO ally for Washington, which relies on Turkey
as a logistics base for the war in Iraq.

Tensions over northern Iraq helped send oil prices to record highs on
Monday. The Kirkuk oil fields of northern Iraq feed export pipelines
running north into Turkey. Turkey’s lira currency also fell almost two
percent against the dollar.

The Bush administration has over the past days urged Turkey to refrain
>From any major military operation in Iraq.

Some analysts and diplomats say an operation is more likely after a
vote last Wednesday in which a U.S. congressional committee branded
killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War One as
genocide — a charge Turkey firmly denies.

Analysts say the resolution has sharply weakened the White House’s
influence over Ankara.

Turkish diplomatic sources told Reuters a planned visit by Foreign
Minister Ali Babacan to Baghdad had been cancelled due to current
conditions. They declined to elaborate.

DEATH TOLL

Dozens of soldiers and civilians have been killed in recent weeks as
the PKK rebels have stepped up their attacks, putting more public
pressure on the government to send troops into Iraq to tackle rebels
based there.

Saygun shrugged off suggestions that NATO’s second-biggest army had
only a limited window of opportunity to attack before winter
conditions made such a move impossible.

"The season would be taken into consideration, and other needs as well
…. But we cannot say that we’ll go to Iraq if it doesn’t snow or we
won’t go if it does," he said.

Meanwhile, Saygun said it was up to the government to determine
Turkey’s reaction to the non-binding Armenian resolution. Turkey
denies genocide was carried out, saying many died in inter-ethnic
fighting during the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The bill was sponsored
by a Californian lawmaker whose district has a large Armenian-American
constituency.

Turkey’s government recalled its ambassador from the United States for
consultations after the committee vote.

Diplomats say that in retaliation, measures could include Turkey
blocking U.S. access to Incirlik air base, cancelling procurement
contracts, downscaling bilateral visits, denying airspace to U.S.
aircraft and halting joint military exercises.

The United States relies heavily on Turkish bases to supply its war
effort in Iraq, where more than 160,000 U.S. troops are trying to
restore stability more than four years after the invasion that toppled
Saddam Hussein.

Ankara has long complained Washington has not done enough on its own
or through the Iraqi government to crack down on some 3,000 PKK rebels
in northern Iraq.

Turkey blames the PKK for the deaths of more than 30,000 people since
the group launched its armed struggle for an ethnic homeland in
southeast Turkey in 1984.

Source: aq-army.html

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-turkey-ir

`march of death’ for hundreds of thousand of Armenians was Genocide

PanARMENIAN.Net

La Stampa: `march of death’ for hundreds of thousand of Armenians in
1915-1918 was Genocide
12.10.2007 18:56 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ `Two problems painfully press on the image and
stability of present-day Turkey, born 84 years ago as result of
Kemalist revolution. These are the past, which doesn’t want to fade,
and the present, which threatens. The past returns again and again,
casting a black shadow of mass killings of Armenians during World War
I, on Ankara. The present threatens with rebellious and belligerent
Kurdish minority,’ says an article titled `Armenians – apple of
discord between Bush and Turkey’ published in La Stampa Italian
newspaper.

`The cruel past and alarming present tend to unite, forming a crisis
which can call into question Turkey’s traditional strategic ties with
the U.S. and NATO. In addition, the current dissension with Washington
and Paris can block Turkey’s thorny path toward the European Union. An
explosive and critical mass is being accumulated in Europe-aspired
Turkey. And on the top of this mass appears one word – Genocide, the
tabooed and defamatory word. This awful word has pealed in the
Democrat-dominated U.S. Congress as a final verdict that cannot be
appealed. This word has come to define the Armenian `marches of death’
that extended from the Anatolian northeast to Syrian deserts in
1915-1918. The Ottoman Empire had no mercy on children, women and old
people. This slaughter is described in historical documents,
bulletins, testimony of witnesses, novels by Franz Werfel and recently
shot films,’ the article says.

`Many historians say it was the first genocide of the 20th century,
maybe because Young Turks, redial reformators and patriots, their
powerful military heirs and secular governments controlled by them,
never recognized the fact of the Genocide. They always denied this
terrifying word and chilling statistics which stubbornly reminded of 1
million 800 thousand killed Armenians. They kept on insisting that the
casualties reached 200 thousand only as result of the chaos inherent
to war. Since those times, the Turkish authorities have followed state
historical revisionism. The incumbent Erdogan and Gul-led Islamist
government is not an exception,’ La Stampa reports

Singapore: A counter-productive vote over ‘genocide’

The Straits Times (Singapore)
October 13, 2007 Saturday

A counter-productive vote over ‘genocide’

TURKEY reacted angrily this Thursday when a committee of the US House
of Representatives voted in Washington to condemn as ‘genocide’ the
mass killings of ethnic Armenians in Turkey.

The Turkish government recalled its ambassador from Washington; it
also threatened to withdraw the logistical and political support for
the US-led operations in neighbouring Iraq.

Seldom before has the mix of politics and history been so
counter-productive.

The event in question took place during World War I, in 1915.
Thousands of ethnic Armenians perished as Turkish troops fought to
keep together their empire.

Yet the dispute is not over that tragedy, but whether this amounted
to genocide, the systematic murder of people on the basis of their
race.

Europe’s bloody history is full of such episodes, but the Armenian
question has become part of a much bigger strategic tussle.

The Armenians, who only regained their independence after the
collapse of the Soviet Union, have transformed this matter into a
struggle for their own identity. And they have used the Armenian
diaspora in pursuit of this agenda.

France has recently passed a law recognising the Armenian ‘genocide’;
the US Congress is now promising to do the same.

Never mind that the French state denied until 1995 any responsibility
for its involvement in the mass murder of the Jews, or that the US
Congress continues to reject the involvement of any international
court in judging America’s deeds; kicking the Turks is, apparently,
cost-free.

The reason is purely electoral. Armenians are largely concentrated in
important electoral states such as California, Michigan and
Massachusetts.

The US resolution could not have come at a worse moment. The Turkish
state is convulsed by a deeper dispute between Islamists and
secularists.

The Islamists, who have always claimed that Turkey has gained nothing
for its quest to copy the institutions of a Western state, now claim
to have been vindicated: The West still rejects Turkey.

Last week, 13 Turkish soldiers were killed by Kurdish fighters who
crossed the border from neighbouring Iraq. The Turkish military has
frequently warned that if the US cannot keep order in Iraq, the Turks
will do it themselves; the humiliation dished out by the US Congress
will only encourage such cross-border clashes.

Not everything is lost. The current resolution is non-binding. The US
administration has opposed it, and President George W. Bush has vowed
to see it consigned to the dustbin.

But the Democrats have promised to bring it to the full floor of the
US Congress by the end of next month.

Reason may yet prevail. Yet if it does not, the biggest casualty from
this affair would be the US itself: its reputation in Turkey will be
torn to shreds.

However, when it comes to seeking re-election, US congressmen do not
seem to care about endangering the lives of current US soldiers.

Perhaps the time has come for other parliaments to start debating the
‘genocide’ of ethnic Indians in North America during the 19th
century? Or ask some questions about what happened to the original
residents of California?

Denying history to preserve the present

Arizona Republic, AZ
Oct 13 2007

Denying history to preserve the present
Oct. 13, 2007 12:00 AM

Turkey, a key ally in our war in Iraq, threatens repercussions if
Congress officially recognizes genocide against Armenians around the
time of World War I. President Bush is calling on Congress to look
the other way and ignore the genocide of perhaps 1.5 million
Armenians by Ottoman Turks. Would we deny the Holocaust, too, if
Germany had Turkey’s clout? Sadly, we must now pause before
answering.

s/articles/1013quickhit-garcia13.html
– Joe Garcia, Viewpoints editor

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinion