Nikol Pashinyan to Teresa Ribeiro: Most Armenia media, including television, are opposition-oriented

 NEWS.am 
Armenia –


Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia received a delegation led by Teresa Ribeiro, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, the Prime Minister’s Office informed Armenian News-NEWS.am.

The Prime Minister highlighted the cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Armenia and the OSCE for effectively promoting democratic reforms in our country. Nikol Pashinyan noted that many reforms have been carried out in the recent years to develop and strengthen democracy in Armenia, including in close cooperation with European partners, and that agenda remains one of the Government’s priorities. The Prime Minister underlined the consistent steps taken in the fight against corruption, noting that our country has made significant progress in the reviews of reputable international organizations. The Prime Minister also highlighted the positive changes in the field of press freedom since 2018, noting that in recent years most of the media in Armenia, including television, are opposition-oriented. The Prime Minister added that the reforms in the field of press freedom are carried out taking into account the international practice, experience and standards.

OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Teresa Ribeiro noted that the steps taken by the Armenian government to strengthen democracy are encouraging and inspiring. Teresa Ribeiro stressed the importance of effective cooperation between the OSCE and the Government of the Republic of Armenia in the field of freedom of speech, including the introduction of new tools in the fight against misinformation. Ms. Ribeiro also noted that the OSCE is ready to facilitate the exchange of experience of journalists and the development of professional skills. The importance of close cooperation between the government and the civil society was also underlined.

CivilNet: Putin and Aliyev raise relations to “allied level”

CIVILNET.AM

22 Feb, 2022 10:02

  • Russian President Vladimir Putin and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev to sign an agreement raising relations to an “allied level.”
  • President of Nagorno-Karabakh Arayik Harutyunyan welcomes Russian President Vladimir Putin’s move to recognize the independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics.
  • A delegation of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, an inter-parliamentary forum of the EU and several post-Soviet states, has held talks with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Credits: Ruptly

UEFA moves Champions League final from Russia to France

Save

Share

 14:28, 25 February, 2022

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 25, ARMENPRESS. The UEFA Men’s Champions League is being relocated from Russia’s Saint Petersburg to Stade de France in Saint-Denis, UEFA said in a statement.

“The UEFA Executive Committee today held an extraordinary meeting following the grave escalation of the security situation in Europe.

The UEFA Executive Committee decided to relocate the final of the 2021/22 UEFA Men’s Champions League from Saint Petersburg to Stade de France in Saint-Denis. The game will be played as initially scheduled on Saturday 28 May at 21:00 CET.

UEFA wishes to express its thanks and appreciation to French Republic President Emmanuel Macron for his personal support and commitment to have European club football’s most prestigious game moved to France at a time of unparalleled crisis. Together with the French government, UEFA will fully support multi-stakeholder efforts to ensure the provision of rescue for football players and their families in Ukraine who face dire human suffering, destruction and displacement.

At today’s meeting, the UEFA Executive Committee also decided that Russian and Ukrainian clubs and national teams competing in UEFA competitions will be required to play their home matches at neutral venues until further notice.

The UEFA Executive Committee further determined to remain on standby to convene further extraordinary meetings, on a regular ongoing basis where required, to reassess the legal and factual situation as it evolves and adopt further decisions as necessary,” UEFA said in a statement.

War in Ukraine: reactions from the South Caucasus

Feb 24 2022

24/02/2022 –  Marilisa Lorusso

The secessionists of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, historically supported by Russia, celebrated the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk. On 23 February, the “Day of the Defender of the Fatherland” was celebrated, as in Russia. On this occasion, Abkhazian President Bzhania made a short public speech while South Ossetian President Bibilov attended a ceremony during which he reiterated all the accusations made by Russian President Vladimir Putin against NATO.

South Ossetia and Abkhazia had already recognised the two Ukrainian breakaway areas in 2014. In addition to political support, South Ossetia has made itself available to host the orphans of the conflict and has put its defence on alert. Bibilov had a series of meetings with the Minister of Defence of South Ossetia in relation to the Ukrainian crisis to verify the state of the forces and means of defence, military equipment, weapons, personnel as well as the willingness to respond to possible provocations from Georgia, should regional tension spread.

A first group of 51 refugees from the “Lugansk People’s Republic” was evacuated to the Russian Federation today and a transfer is planned to Abkhazia. According to reports from local authorities, “Abkhazian Emergency Minister” Lev Kvitsinia personally supervised the transfer from Lugansk. About a hundred refugees are expected to arrive.

In addition to political support, therefore, South Ossetia and Abkhazia will provide active assistance in favour of the invasion.

The recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk was received very differently in Tbilisi. In recent days, many have drawn a parallel between war and Russian recognition of secessionist areas in Georgia in 2008 and what is happening in Ukraine. If it is true that there are common elements, that is military coercion and political recognition, it is equally true that there are also big differences. In Georgia, the recognition took place after a brief war on a very limited area (even if the strategic bombing had extended beyond the area of the invasion by land). In the case of the attack on Ukraine, however, the recognition provided the pretext for much larger military operations. But also, as Georgian President Salome Zourabishvili noted: “Russia in 2008 was not exactly like Russia in 2022 […] Russia is moving directly towards annexation even without the pretext of war, which means that we are a step higher in the level of conflict”.

The Georgian parliament recently approved a Resolution in support of the territorial integrity of Ukraine  , much criticised by the opposition because at no point is Russia openly mentioned. In the reactions of the entire ruling class of Tbilisi today, however, Russia is indicated as an aggressor without the reticence of the past which, according to Zourabishvili, was due to the precarious Georgian security situation.

Until a few days ago, Armenia was the only country in the Caucasus to be linked to Moscow by an alliance pact. Nevertheless, like Belarus, Armenia has not officially recognised the political choices of the last 14 years of Russian wars, and therefore does not recognise either Abkhazia or South Ossetia, or the annexation of Crimea. As regards the recognition of the two new secessionists in Donbas, and the crisis in general, questioned by the press, the Armenian Foreign Minister  replied: “We certainly want the existing issues between our two friendly states to be resolved through diplomatic dialogue, negotiations and in accordance with the norms and principles of international law and the Charter of the United Nations. We hope that the necessary steps are aimed at reducing the tension and resolving the situation peacefully”. Asked whether Armenia would recognise Donetsk and Lugansk, he replied that recognition is not on the agenda.

Today’s Russian military aggression puts Armenia in a very difficult situation, not only because Armenian-Ukrainian relations are good, but also because an important Armenian community resides in Ukraine – in Donetsk alone, more than 50,000 Ukrainians of Armenian origin and Armenians who emigrated to Ukraine. The Armenian Embassy   is operational in the country and a possible evacuation plan for the Armenians is being prepared.

The reaction of the de facto president of Nagorno Karabakh Arayik Harutyunyan was far more enthusiastic. Karabakh is not recognised by any country, including Armenia and Russia, although the latter is stationed there with a military garrison of peace-keepers, similarly to what happens in Transnistria, a separate region of Moldova. Harutyunyan was quick to compare the situation in Karabakh with that of Donetsk and Luhansk, thus hoping for recognition for the de facto entity he chairs.

On 22 February, Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev travelled to Moscow, just shortly after Russia recognised the independence of Donetsk and Luhansk. The meeting between Putin and Aliyev lasted about 5 hours and led to the signing of a Declaration of Allied Interaction which takes collaboration between the two countries to a higher level. During the meeting, Putin took care to inform Aliyev that Russia’s non-recognition of Ukrainian sovereignty does not concern the other post-Soviet republics. On 14 January. as the crisis was mounting, Aliyev went to Ukraine   where he signed a Declaration of Deep Strategic Cooperation with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy which establishes the willingness to provide mutual support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the two states within internationally recognised borders, also against hybrid threats, for stability in the Black-Caspian region and beyond. The Allied Integration Declaration   signed by Azerbaijan with Russia instead provides for mutual military support but within the framework of the United Nations Charter or separate international agreements.

On 23 February, Aliyev then talked on the phone with his true great ally, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, after the latter had had a telephone exchange with Putin during which he had condemned the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk. There is no doubt that Azerbaijani and Turkish policy in reaction to the ongoing invasion – which directly threatens the interests of the two countries because it puts the security of the entire Black Sea region at risk – will be coordinated.

Asbarez: Der Matossian Unveils New Book on Adana Massacres of 1909

“The Horrors of Adana: Revolution and Violence in the Early Twentieth Century” book cover

After a decade of meticulous research in more than 15 archives, Bedross Der Matossian’s book on the Adana Massacres of 1909 has recently been published in paperback, hardcover, and kindle editions by Stanford University Press.

Titled “The Horrors of Adana: Revolution and Violence in the Early Twentieth Century,” the book examines the 1909 twin massacres that shook the province of Adana, located in the southern Anatolia region of modern-day Turkey, killing more than 20,000 Armenians and 2,000 Muslims. Images of Adana after the massacres show unprecedented physical destruction of a once prosperous city. Local Armenian businesses, churches, residences, and living quarters were totally destroyed.

The violence that began in the city of Adana soon spread across the province and poured beyond its borders eastward into the province of Aleppo. In terms of the number of victims, this was the third-largest act of violence perpetrated at the beginning of the twentieth century, following only the Boxer rebellion (1899–1901) and the genocide of the Herero and Nama between 1904 and 1907 in the German colony of southwest Africa.

The central Ottoman government immediately sent investigation commissions and established courts-martial to try the perpetrators of the massacres. However, these courts failed to prosecute the main culprits of the massacres—a miscarriage of justice that would have repercussions in the years to come.

“The Horrors of Adana” offers one of the first close examinations of these events, analyzing sociopolitical and economic transformations that culminated in a cataclysm of violence. Drawing on primary sources in a dozen languages, the book provides an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the rumors and emotions, public spheres and humanitarian interventions that together informed this complex event. Ultimately, through consideration of the Adana Massacres in micro-historical detail, “The Horrors of Adana” presents an important macrocosmic understanding of ethnic violence, illuminating how and why ordinary people can become perpetrators. 

The Christian Quarter in Adana, 1909. source: George Grantham Bain Collection (Library of Congress)

Despite the significance of these events and the extent of violence and destruction, the Adana Massacres are often left out of historical narratives especially in the historiographies of Ottoman and Middle Eastern studies. Denialists of the Armenian Genocide continue to propagate the provocation thesis regarding these massacres. They view the “events” or the “disturbances” of Adana as a failed uprising by Armenians to bring in European intervention with the aim of erecting the Kingdom of Cilicia. Furthermore, they normalize the resulting violence as a natural byproduct of Armenian “provocations.”

Der Matossian offers a necessary corrective to these narratives by arguing that outbreaks like the Adana massacres do not occur sui generis; they are caused by a range of complex, intersecting factors that are deeply rooted in the shifting local and national ground of political and socioeconomic life. The book also addresses the question of how better to understand the Adana massacres in relation to the Armenian Genocide, while bearing in mind their individual trajectories rather than simply viewing the first event as foreshadowing the second.

“‘The Horrors of Adana’ is a truly groundbreaking and highly nuanced exploration of intercommunal, sectarian, and nationalist violence in the late Ottoman Empire. A must-read for scholars of the modern Middle East,” said Ussama Makdisi, Rice University, author of “Age of Coexistence: The Ecumenical Frame and the Making of the Modern Arab World.”

“‘The Horrors of Adana’ is an outstanding analysis of a massacre never before deeply studied. Bedross Der Matossian offers a thorough inquiry into the perpetrators, victims, bystanders, and social-political context, useful to all those interested in understanding processes of mass violence,” said Jacques Semelin, Sciences Po Paris, author of “Purify and Destroy: The Political Uses of Massacre and Genocide.”

“With ‘The Horrors of Adana,’ the Adana Massacres get their own story, a story that needs telling. Bedross Der Matossian’s deeply researched and engagingly argued book situates Adana in a longer trajectory of ‘forgotten’ massacres and as part of Ottoman history more broadly,” said Michelle Tusan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, author of “The British Empire and the Armenian Genocide: Humanitarianism and Imperial Politics from Gladstone to Churchill.”

Copies of the book can be purchases through Amazon or by visiting the Stanford University Press website.

Bedross Der Matossian

Bedross Der Matossian is the Vice-Chair, Associate Professor of Modern Middle East History, and Hymen Rosenberg Professor in Judaic Studies the at Department of History at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He is also the President of the Society for Armenian Studies.

Born and raised in Jerusalem, he is a graduate of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He completed his Ph.D. in Middle East History in the Department of Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies at Columbia University in 2008. From 2008 to 2010, he was a Lecturer of Middle East History at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He has been appointed as the Dumanian Visiting Professor in the University of Chicago for Spring 2014. He is the author and co-editor of multiple books including the award-winning book “Shattered Dreams of Revolution: From Liberty to Violence in the Late Ottoman Empire” (Stanford University Press, 2014).

Dr. Mike Sarian Donates $100,000 to ARF Rosdom Gomideh

From left, Holy Martyrs parish priest, Archpriest Razmig Khachadourian, Dr. Mike Sarian and chairman of ARF Rosdom Gomideh, Garo Kamarian

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation’s West San Fernando Valley Rosdom Gomideh announced a donation of $100,000 by long-time benefactor Dr. Mike Sarian.

The ARF Rosdom Gomideh said that the donation will fund the construction of a steel courtyard at 5300 White Oak Avenue in Encino, which houses the Holy Martyrs Armenian Church and the Ferrahian Armenian High School campus. The courtyard construction was a project planned by the ARF Rosdom Gomideh to facilitate the compound.

After announcing Dr. Sarian’s generous contribution, the ARF Rosdom Gomideh announced that the courtyard will be named the “Khatoun Sarian ARF Rosdom Gomideh Courtyard.”

“This project to cover the courtyard has been a dream that will soon come true. The courtyard will be used by all sister organizations and the Holy Martyrs Church for upcoming events and a place where our youth and community members may gather and and enjoy outdoors events. Thank you Dr. Mike Sarian,” the ARF Rosdom Gomideh said in a Facebook post on Wednesday.

Major contest, championship and conference: Armenia to host a number of int’l events this year

Save

Share

 12:40, 17 February, 2022

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 17, ARMENPRESS. The government of Armenia approved today providing financial support to the Boxing Federation for holding the 2022 European Boxing Championship in Yerevan on May 21-31.

During the Cabinet meeting today Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sport Vahram Dumanyan said the draft envisages providing 77 million 768 thousand drams for holding the event.

The minister said that nearly 280 athletes from over 40 countries are expected to participate in the championship.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in his turn said that it is necessary to properly prepare for the event. He said that other allocations will also be provided on this direction.

“We are also allocating money to the Sports and Concert Complex so that it manages to get ready. This year we will have an event of pan-European significance in the Sports and Concert Complex. The talk is about the Junior Eurovision Contest. I draw the attention of the ministry of economy, our partners of the tourism sector on these events. I think this is a good chance for our tourism companies to get activated and recover the tourism flows in the post-Covid period”, the PM said.

In turn Minister of Economy Vahan Kerobyan informed that other events are also expected in the country this year. Particularly, the UN World Tourism Organization’s annual conference which will be held in Armenia this year on June 1-3. The minister said they will try to hold it in Gyumri’s Sev Berd (Black Fortress). In addition, the Starmus international festival will take place in September on the sidelines of which 6 Nobel Prize winners will arrive in Armenia.

Works are also underway to invite Nobel Prize winner Artem Patapoutian to Armenia in mid-June.

The Minister of Education said that Armenia will also host the 2022 International Biology Olympiad.




Armenian Crossroads: PM Pashinyan presents details of North-South, East-West project

Public Radio of Armenia
Feb 17 2022

The North-South project has been redesigned and turned into a North-South, East-West project, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at the government sitting today.

“This actually means that one of the branches of that road – the North-South, East-West, or the Armenian crossroads – will link the north to the south, i.e. Armenia to Iran. The other branch will stretch from Azerbaijan to Armenia and later to Nakhijevan and Turkey,” the Prime Minister noted.

PM Pashinyan said the pre-qualification tender for the Sisian-Kajaran section of the North-South road has been announced.

He voiced hope that by the end of the year there will be specific construction companies to carry out the work. Of course, the East-West project part has not been done, but in the context of political agreements, we will implement that part very quickly.”

The Prime Minister noted that id you know that concrete work is underway for the construction of the Armenian section of the Yeraskh-Julfa-Ordubad-Meghri-Horadiz railway.

“In fact, although the technical and design work has already started, we hope that in the near future the agreements reached will be enshrined in a document, and the process will be be developing at full pace,” he said.

The pre-qualification phase will last 70 days. “We hope that within 70 days companies will actively submit applications, after which the qualified companies will have the opportunity to participate in the tender announced for the construction works,” he said.

Asbarez: Prolific Armenian Broadcaster Sarky Mouradian Passes Away

Sarky Mouradian

Sarky Mouradian, a prolific broadcaster credited with establishing Armenian television programs in the Diaspora, passed away in Los Angeles. He was 90.

The news was reported by the Armenian Film Society, which in a statement said that the broadcaster passed away on February 10.

“The passing of Sarky Mouradian is a huge loss, not just for the Armenian community but for the film community at large. Mr. Mouradian was a pioneer in more ways than one and was prolific up until his passing at the age of 90. The Armenian community will remember him for his incredible contributions to film and television,” said the Armenian Film Society as reported by Deadline.

His grandson Tristan said that Sarky Mouradian left “a legacy spanning decades. His influence on Armenian television, music and film in America will never be forgotten.”

In 1978, Mouradian established Armenian Teletime, one of the first Armenian television broadcasts. The programs featured interviews with Armenian community members, elected officials and celebrities. The program that featured Mouradian’s iconic voice became staple of Armenian-American households on weekends.

Prior to that Mouradian tried his hand at filmmaking. He wrote and directed such films as Sons of Sassoun (1973), Tears of Happiness (1975), Promise of Love (1978) and Alicia (2002). Mouradian also adapted Franz Werfel’s 1933 novel The Forty Days of Musa Dagh into a feature film in 1982. This made him a constant target of Turkish government revisionism.

Mouradian was born on November 15, 1931, in Beirut. He began performing music at the age of 16. In 1955, he moved to Boston to continue his education in music then relocated to Los Angeles in 1960 to pursue his passion for film. There he attended the Theater of Arts and began working in the industry.

He was awarded an honor by Armenia’s Culture Ministry in 2016.

Despite the proliferation of Armenian television channels and a changing landscape, Mouradian continued to pursue his passion of preserving Armenian culture. Armenian Teletime continued to be produced and broadcast on YouTube, along with his archive of decades of footage

U.S. Mission to the OSCE: On Azerbaijan Releasing Eight Detained Armenians

U.S. Mission to the OSCE
Feb 10 2022

As delivered by Deputy Political Counselor Lewis Gitter
to the Permanent Council, Vienna

Thank you, Mr. Chair. 

The United States welcomes Azerbaijan’s release of Armenian detainees.  Efforts to facilitate the return of all remaining detainees and fully account for missing persons, including from the 1990s, are critical to lasting peace in the region.   

The United States remains committed to promoting a secure, stable, democratic, prosperous, and peaceful future for the South Caucasus region.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.