Davis Avoided The Question

DAVIS AVOIDED THE QUESTION

A1+
[07:29 pm] 26 June, 2006

Answering the question of an Armenian TV Channel Terry Davis, Council
of Europe Secretary General referred to the relations between Armenia
and Turkey and connected them with the Karabakh conflict which has not
been settled yet. Taking the chance of meeting him in the PACE summer
session why asked Mr. Davis what is the logic for Armenia to accept
the precondition put forward by Turkey according to which the borders
will be opened if the NKR conflict is settled in favor of Azerbaijan.

Mr. Davis informed that he does not remember when he said so as he
had interviews with many journalists in South Caucasus. In any case
he is convinced that the Karabakh conflict must be settled within
the framework of the interests of NK, Azerbaijan and Armenia, and
that becoming member of the CoE, the two countries are obliged to
find the peaceful settlement of the conflict.

By the way, when one of the Georgian journalists tried to find out the
opinion of the Secretary General about the possibility of a referendum
in Osetia and Abkhazia, he offered not to compare the case with that of
Serbia and Montenegro. According to Davis, In Serbia and Montenegro
there was an agreement between the parties to hold a referendum,
whereas in Osetia and Abkhazia, as well as in Karabakh there in the
ethnic problem.

BAKU: Azerbaijan To Earn $140bln For 20 Years

AZERBAIJAN TO EARN $140 BLN FOR 20 YEARS

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
June 25 2006

By estimation of international financial institutions, Azerbaijan
will earn $140 bln only from the oil projects for 20 years.

"Azerbaijan will take advantage of these opportunities to strengthen
the army, so that any moment it could win our occupied lands back. I
have no doubt about that and hope that our policy will lead to this,"
said President Ilham Aliyev at the graduation ceremony at the Heydar
Aliyev High Military School.

According to the President, Armenia gets nothing by temporizing.

"The time is not working for them, and on the contrary, the time is
on our side" said the President.

"Azerbaijan will never put up with separation of Nagorno-Karabakh
from Azerbaijan, and will restore its territorial integrity by either
peaceful or military means."

Azerbaijan’s leader warns talks with Armenia over disputed enclave g

Azerbaijan’s leader warns talks with Armenia over disputed enclave going nowhere

AP Worldstream; Jun 23, 2006

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev on Friday warned that talks with
Armenia over the disputed enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh were going
nowhere and vowed to recover the territory.

"The negotiations are taking place in different frameworks but these
talks are ineffective because we can’t obtain a result," Aliev said,
accusing Armenia of dragging out the negotiating process.

"Azerbaijan will restore its territorial integrity, either through
peaceful or military means," he said.

The two former Soviet Caucasus nations’ presidents made two failed
efforts this year to resolve the status of the disputed enclave.

Nagorno-Karabakh is inside Azerbaijan but populated mostly by ethnic
Armenians, who have run it and seven contiguous districts since an
uneasy 1994 cease-fire ended six years of full-scale war.

Sporadic border clashes regularly break out. The unresolved conflict
has held up development in the strategic region.

ANCA Launches Action in Support of U.S. Amd. to Armenia John Evans

ANCA Launches Action in Support of U.S. Amd. to Armenia John Evans

PanARMENIAN.Net
23.06.2006 17:34 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will
be holding a confirmation hearing for Ambassador Designate to
Armenia Richard Hoagland on Wednesday, June 28th at 2:30pm in
419 Dirksen Senate Office Building. The nomination hearing can
be viewed LIVE on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee website
The Armenian National Committee of
America launches an action in support of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia
John Evans. "This may be our last chance to get an honest explanation
about this controversy, before it is swept under the rug by a State
Department all too eager to erase this "inconvenient truth." Please
take 60 seconds today to call your Senator and leave a message for
his/her Foreign Affairs Legislative Assistant asking them to take
action on this issue," the ANCA statement says.

To remind, Amb. Evans’ recall was caused by the statement on the
Armenian Genocide he made February 19, 2005 at the meeting with the
Armenian community of California. "Today I will call it the Armenian
Genocide," John Evans said.

http://foreign.senate.gov/.

Russia’s role in NK conflict as great as in Abkhazia, South Ossetia

RUSSIA’S ROLE IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT AS GREAT AS IN ABKHAZIA, SOUTH OSSETIA

Arka News Agency, Armenia
June 22 2006

STEPANAKERT, June 22. /ARKA/. Russia’s role in the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict is as great as in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the German
scholar Tessa Hofman told reporters. She participated in the
international scientific conference "Nagorno-Karabakh Republic: past,
present, future".

According to her, the Karabakh war can easily be called a war of
liberation because Armenian liberated the territory where they resided
as a majority.

Hofman said that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has so far been frozen
for two reasons. First, Karabakh does not take part in the negotiations
held with internationally recognized countries.

Secondly, no analysis of the real causes of the conflict is available.

Speaking of the possibility of the international community’s changing
its attitude to the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement, she pointed out that,
although with reluctance, the international community recognized the
independence of Serbia and Montenegro. P.T. -0–

MTS, Vimpelcom on shortlist for Armentel

MTS, Vimpelcom on shortlist for Armentel

SKRIN Market & Corporate News
June 23, 2006 Friday 2:00 PM GMT

MTS, Vimpelcom and two foreign consortiums are on the shortlist in
the auction for a 90% stake in Armentel, Armenia’s fixed line monopoly
and a local GSM operator, Aton Capital said.

The former Soviet republic has a population of 3mn and cellular
penetration of around 21%. Armentel and K Telecom split the local
cellular market roughly 50/50 and the former reported 2005 revenue
of $145nm.

The acquisition of Armentel would add 3.6% to MTS’ top line or 2.6%
to Vimpelcom’s.

Aton estimates that Armentel’s cellular business accounts for 30% of
revenue, while the final buyer may opt to dispose of the fixed-line
segment. Aton would view a price of up to $350mn for the stake as
reasonable.

Report On Armenian Media To Be Submitted To OSCE

REPORT ON ARMENIAN MEDIA TO BE SUBMITTED TO OSCE

/PanARMENIAN.Net
21.06.2006 17:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Upon compellation of visit to Armenia a report
on freedom of the media in the republic and recommendations for
improvement of the situation will be submitted to the OSCE, Miklos
Haraszti, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media stated in
Yerevan. In his words, the report will be free for press and NGOs
interested in the issue.

The OSCE Representative remarked that some positive tendencies can
be observed in the printing media.

"They furnish a wider scope of opinions, what cannot be said about
the electronic media, specifically the TV channels. However the
positions of the printing media are weak as compared to the TV,"
he said adding that journalists are not persecuted or assaulted in
Armenia and this is a considerable achievement. At that he remarked
that the National Commission for Television and Radio formed by the
President needs reorganization. "The chapter on the National Commission
for Television and Radio should be changed in accord with the reviewed
Constitution. The Commission should be more open and independent. We
have submitted out proposals on the issue," the OSCE Representative
said. Mr Haraszti also remarked that there are many TV channels in
Armenia but all of them furnish almost the same information.

Foreign Minister Oskanian Speaks About The Third Armenia Diaspora Co

PRESS RELEASE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
Contact: Information Desk
Tel: (374-10) 52-35-31
Email: [email protected]
Web:

ARMENIADIAS PORA III
Armenpress Interview with Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian
June 8, 2006

QUESTION: Mr. Oskanian, two Armenia-Diaspora conferences have already taken
place. Will the third conference differ from the first two?

Armenia Diaspora III is being convened under new historical and
geo-political realities and naturally the agenda of the conference and the
issues discussed there must reflect on the problems, developments and
challenges facing our nation today and in years to come.

This year, Armenians around the world will celebrate 15 years of Armenian
independence. In that light, ArmeniaDiaspora III is a good opportunity to
examine together the path we’ve traveled, analyze and assess the present and
consider the prospects for future development.

In these past years, much has changed in Armenian life.

Specifically, by overcoming many difficulties, Armenia has entered a period
of economic progress, and in recent years has registered serious growth.

During the same time period, there have been important changes in the
Diaspora too, and the Diaspora has become more focused, allowing for active
participation in the processes of proposing and resolving problems.

So, today, we have real opportunities, and in addition to the general issues
on the Diaspora agenda, and unlike the previous conferences, we will put
forward new programs of a pan-Armenian nature around which all Armenians can
rally.

QUESTION: What are the pan-Armenian issues on the agenda of ArmeniaDiaspora
III?

We¹ve come a long way over these 15 years, and overcome great difficulties.
Over the next 15 years, we must work hard to turn Armenia into the country
of our dreams. That can only happen if Armenia¹s expectations of the
Diaspora and the Diaspora¹s expectations of Armenia are more evenly matched.
The Conference will deal with those issues.

At the same time, with independence come questions about identify, about
homeland-diaspora relations, about language and religion, and about diaspora
institutions. And if our traditional organizations used to look at these
questions one way, today¹s youth approaches these issues very differently.
They are looking for new answers to old questions. That is why the second
half of the conference will focus on exactly that ­ New Answers to Old
Questions ­ A Nation-State in the 21st Century.

This way, we will have addressed the two fundamental issues facing a people
and a country ­ identity and development — who we are and who we want to
become.

QUESTION: Can you elaborate on the development program that you have
mentioned?

Everyone who has visited Armenia comments on the discrepancy in lifestyle
and standard of living between the cities and the rural areas. Armenia¹s
economic growth indicators are impressive, but that growth really has not
reached the villages. If we want to ensure that these rural communities are
not destined to remain stagnant, permanent pockets of poverty, if we want to
ensure that Armenians are not born into a cycle of poverty, then we cannot
allow development to simply take its course. Even at this current fast pace,
it will take decades before we reach even the average European level of
prosperity.

This will be a very broad effort to eradicate rural poverty in Armenia. The
strategic objective of this program is reducing poverty in rural Armenia¹s
border villages through an integrated approach. The program will provide the
necessary intervention in the form of infrastructure and technical support,
and in partnership with the residents of the village, the program will
support economic development in order to enable the sustainability and
viability of rural communities.

QUESTION: What is the scope of this program? How will you decide where to
begin?

The effects of rural poverty and hopelessness on migration, regional
stability, geo-strategic and economic security are obvious in these
villages. That is why we have decided to begin with Armenia¹s border areas.
It¹s going to take a focused, targeted collaborative effort to improve life
for our compatriots in these critical border areas.

In each of these villages, necessary infrastructure is simply non-existent.
Some have no paved roads, others have no running water, some have no gas or
electricity. Imagine trying to raise a family or make a living without these
basics. Then, in addition to weak infrastructure, they also are often not
economically self-sufficient. This is a problem throughout Armenia, but I
don¹t think anyone will doubt that the border is critical.

QUESTON: Why launch such an ambitious and novel program now?

Why now? There are three main reasons.

First, we want to build on the international momentum that already exists.
Over the next five years, the Millennium Challenge Corporation will build
roads and bring irrigation water to Armenia¹s rural areas. In addition,
there is the generous new Lincy program that will build roads and schools
within and outside Yerevan. There are massive World Bank, USAID, DFID and
IFAD programs throughout Armenia. The Armenia Fund, too, has programs
throughout Armenia, as well as Karabakh, of course.We want to leverage these
programs and locate additional funds in order to bring comprehensive
development to the villages. Imagine that a village will, in a few years,
have irrigation water and roads, thanks to the MCC, for example. But imagine
that there will be no drinking water, no health care, no school, no gas or
electricity in that village. Imagine children growing up in a 21st century
rural community that has roads and water and electricity, but is without
access to telephone, television or internet. We can¹t let that happen. Now
imagine what we could do together if the Armenian government, Armenia¹s
business community, international organizations, and the Armenian Diaspora
came together to leverage the MCC contributions and to build on the MCC
momentum. Imagine a country where development is comprehensive, even, fair
and just.

The second reason to do it now is to sustain the pace of economic
development. Look, we¹ve had high growth, at least in part because our point
of departure was low. Our economy had collapsed. But the more the economy
grows, the harder it will be to maintain double-digit growth. Additional
infusion and intervention is necessary and why not target that infusion
towards the areas that need it most?

Finally, Armenia has, over these 15 years, held a leading role in this
region. This may sound surprising, but it¹s true. Georgia has a more
favorable geographic position and access to the sea, Azerbaijan has already
been pumping massive amounts of oil ­ more than 300,000 barrels a day over
the last several years, yet, according to the World Bank, per capita income
is still higher in Armenia. This is something to be proud of, but it¹s also
something we must work at. We have to keep that edge even with the prospects
of additional oil revenues expected for Azerbaijan. We can do that only if
we aggressively mobilize our resources and clearly set comprehensive
economic development as our goal.

QUESTION: What will happen to the various organizations already working
towards rural development?

This program will make every effort to partner with all existing
organizations and programs in order to achieve maximum effectiveness and
efficiency. We have already spoken to every single organization, individual
and agency (more than 100 in number) with programs in Armenia¹s villages.
Our program is not intended to replace or compete with existing programs. On
the contrary, we will work with them to build on their efforts, to increase
their capacity. Our website will reflect their efforts as well, so that
donors and participants receive a complete picture of what is being done,
and what is still needed.

QUESTION: How will you seek support for this program?

This very serious and far-reaching program can only succeed with the active
engagement and involvement of a variety of actors and participants.
Individual countries have already expressed a willingness to focus their
development assistance on our rural areas. International organizations are
already focused on rural development. As are individual Diasporans and
Diaspora organizations. Now, we must also engage and involve Armenia¹s
businessmen, and new elements of the Diaspora.

This project is varied and broad enough that individuals can find a variety
of ways of getting involved. That is why this topic will form the focus of
the agenda of the 3d Armenia Diaspora Conference, to be held in Yerevan,
September 18 ­ 20.

There, we will explain the program¹s purpose, how it will be implemented,
how the funds will be raised and managed, and the key issues of transparency
and accountability will be addressed.

QUESTION: Will the management of the program remain within the Diaspora
Conference?

Until the ArmeniaDiaspora Conference, we will have completed the design of
the program, the management structure and begun the process of assessing
needs and finding sponsors for villages. After the ArmeniaDiaspora
Conference, we envision that the Armenia Fund is best situated to take over
as the umbrella which will implement the program. This ambitious program is
a natural expansion of the Armenia Fund¹s mission ­ to facilitate
infrastructure and development programs that are beyond the government¹s
capacity.

It was a visionary step to create the Armenia Fund, soon after independence,
when its additional resources were sorely needed. It has since completed
projects which have invaluable, strategic significance for Armenia and
Armenians. Now, we are at a stage when we can and should broaden that
vision. Fifteen years after independence, we are no longer desperate and
focused on everyday survival. Today, we must project a vision for Armenia in
2020.

Of course, the breadth and scope of the program will require the Fund to
increase capacity, to provide even greater transparency and to involve wider
segments of the Diaspora.

QUESTION: What you¹ve described is truly inspiring and has vital
significance for Armenia¹s development. Are you certain that the program
will really come to life?

As I said, during these 15 years of independence, our people have withstood
horrible, heavy challenges and succeeded in overcoming them and ensuring
stable and harmonious conditions for the development of our new Republic.

There is an increased sense of responsibility on the part of all segments of
our nation toward our future development, and toward resolution of our
national problems and issues, together.

We are certain that if all our institutions are activated and inspired, and
if Armenia¹s and the Diaspora¹s resources are gathered around this program,
we will be able to implement this program and provide our compatriots living
in rural communities with basic conditions of dignity so that they can live
and work.

And perhaps the fundamental basis of our conviction is our talented and
active people, which has throughout history, in different countries, stood
out through its diligence and creative spirit, and has displayed dauntless
will and faith.

Therefore, together, we can and we must take this program forward in order
for our people to develop and prosper in safety and security.

This will be the essential message of ArmeniaDiaspora III.

–Boundary_(ID_pHFyPJDl+G/hlllU0jTW+A)–

http://www.ArmeniaForeignMinistry.am

Meeting Javakhk Basic Demands Only Way Out Of Crisis Today

MEETING JAVAKHK BASIC DEMANDS ONLY WAY OUT OF CRISIS TODAY

PanARMENIAN.Net
20.06.2006 14:26 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Russian military bases would be withdrawn from
Georgia sooner or later, political scientist Hrazdan Madoyan stated in
an interview with PanARMENIAN.Net. In his words, an event took place,
which made null and void Russia’s policy since almost Peter the Great:
Russia withdrew from the Caucasus.

"All roads are open to panturanism. The base in Armenia is important
to us, it solves a tactical, not strategic task. Upon Turkization of
Javakhk – a thing Turkey has worked for always and to which Georgia
suicidally contributes – Turks will restore the Turkish zone from
Anatolia to Azerbaijan. Armenia becomes a secure enclave, fully
dependent on the will and desires of Turkey. Thus we say that Javakhk
is a matter of life to Armenia," he remarked.

Madoyan underscored that Armenians of Javakhk are not unprotected. "The
population of the region can protect itself. Another matter is that
it will ricochet Armenia, which will be involved in a conflict as in
1988. Meeting Javakhk demands is the only way out of the crisis today:
making all Armenian regions and villages a joint administrative unit,
providing it administrative autonomy, refusal of central authorities
to change the demographic situation, free communication with Armenia,"
the political scientist said.

Madoyan is also sure that Kars-Akhalkalaki-Baku project will be
implemented in case Armenians do not excite a rebellion – not
necessarily an armed one. "If they do not rise, it will be the end
of Javakhk," he stated.

Labor Party Is Reluctant To Conform

LABOR PARTY IS RELUCTANT TO CONFORM

Lragir.am
20 June 06

The liberal forces will become more widely engaged in the political
sphere of Armenia in the upcoming parliamentary election, forecast
Gurgen Arsenyan, the leader of the Labor Party, on June 20. He said
that his point of view is based on their information and analyses,
as well as the present picture of the parliament. Gurgen Arsenyan
says this parliament is essentially socialist, whereas people demand
liberalism. "Ardarutiun Alliance is socialist by nature, pro-socialist,
the National Unity is leftist, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(Dashnaktsutiun) is leftist, Orinats Yerkir is centrist pro-leftist,
the Labor Party is liberal, the Republican is centrist pro-rightist,"
says Gurgen Arsenyan. Among the forces outside the parliament
he points to the All-Armenian Movement and the Heritage Party as
liberal. Arsenyan mentions that the prospect of the political sphere
is liberalism.

He says Bargavach Hayastan Party is not liberal. "It is Gensher’s
program, conservative progressive. These two words mean Gensher,"
says Gurgen Arsenyan, saying that the author of their program is not
MP Victor Dallakyan. He knows who the author is but he declines to say
who. The leader of the Labor Party does not exclude an alliance with
a liberal force, but he says that there is no question of alliance
in 2007 on the agenda of the Labor Party.

"The United Labor Party has not discussed and considered alliance
in any form or under any circumstances so far. This question is
not under consideration. We are reluctant to conform," says Gurgen
Arsenyan. According to him, the ability of the United Labor Party
will be seen after the election in 2007, when it becomes clear what
percentage of voters supported the political party.