Azat Hayrenik Party pending

Azat Hayrenik Party pending

Anahit Danielyan
25-08-2007 12:32:45 – KarabakhOpen

A few days later the acting president’s office will end, and the new
president will be inaugurated. People expect changes, especially in
government. They say the number of contenders for each ministerial post
is record high.

What posts does the Azat Hayrenik Party expect to get, which supported
the president elect considerably during the election campaign? We asked
this question to the chair of the Azat Hayrenik Party Arayik
Harutiunyan.

Mr. Harutiunyan, what are the party’s expectations after the
inauguration of the new president?

The party expects first of all the implementation of the program which
was highly appreciated and accepted by people. I think the program
reflects the expectations of people, and our party will go out of its
way to participate in its implementation.

What are your thoughts on appointments? Do you expect to get any posts?

We cannot expect posts for the simple reason that according to the
Constitution the president nominates the prime minister, and the
parliament affirms, and our party which is represented to the National
Assembly will have the opportunity to vote for or against the
affirmation. After the affirmation the prime minister and the president
will appoint the cabinet. The new government will present the program
of development of the country to the parliament. I think it should not
differ from the election program of the president who has considerable
influence on forming the government.

Are you consulting and negotiating on appointments?

No, we are not negotiating on appointments because the prime minister
nominates and the president appoints the members of government.
Besides, the cabinet is not discussed now because the prime minister
has not even been nominated yet.

Is it possible that a representative of the Azat Hayrenik Party will be
appointed prime minister?

It is the president’s prerogative. Nothing can be ruled out. Our role
regarding the appointment of a prime minister will be confined to
voting in the parliament.

Silence on Armenian Genocide Does Neither ADL Nor Israel Any Good

Jewish Exponent, PA
Aug 23 2007

Silence on Armenian Genocide Does Neither ADL Nor Israel Any Good
August 23, 2007

Leonard Fein

On the surface, the question of how Jews should regard the genocide
of Armenians should be an easy call.

Here, for example, is the text of a cable that Henry Morgenthau, Sr.,
then America’s ambassador to Turkey, sent to the State Department on
July 10, 1915:

"Persecution of Armenians assuming unprecedented proportions. Reports
from widely scattered districts indicate systematic attempt to uproot
peaceful Armenian population and through arbitrary arrests, terrible
tortures, whole-sale expulsions, and deportations from one end of the
Empire to the other accompanied by frequent instances of rape,
pillage and murder, turning into massacre, to bring destruction and
destitution on them. These measures are not in response to popular or
fanatical demand but are purely arbitrary and directed from
Constantinople in the name of military necessity, often in districts
where no military operations are likely to take place."

And then, on August 11, his cable back home referred to "this effort
to exterminate a race."

Morgenthau couldn’t use the word "genocide"; it wasn’t invented until
1944. But today, the overwhelming majority of scholars around the
world are in agreement: The first genocide of the 20th century was
committed by Turkey, and the Armenians were its victims. But Turkey
labors mightily to impeach the scholarship and to claim that
Armenians were mere casualties of war.

Unlike the many nations that have established commissions of truth
and reconciliation, that have looked fearlessly into their own past
crimes against humanity (most notably, Germany itself), Turkey hires
K Street lobbyists to persuade the American public and the U.S.
Congress that its hands are clean, its heart is pure.

It is doubtful that many people are persuaded by the Turks and their
lobbyists. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum recognizes the Armenian
Genocide, as does the Reform Jewish movement, as, one assumes, do
most Jewish leaders — even the leaders of the Anti-Defamation
League, the American Jewish Committee, the Jewish Institute for
National Security Affairs and B’nai Brith International. Yet the
leaders of these organizations have steadfastly refused to endorse a
bill currently before Congress that would formally acknowledge the
fact of the Armenian genocide.

How can that be? Why do they shy away from using the word "genocide"
to describe the tragedy of the Armenians at the hands of Ottoman
Empire Turkey?

The answer is unsettling. It has nothing to do with history or truth;
it has everything to do with the strategic interests of Israel, as
also, to a lesser degree, of the United States. Turkey is a Moslem
country which maintains cordial and strategically important relations
with both Israel and America. That is presumably why in 2001, Shimon
Peres, then Israel’s foreign minister, could say, "We reject attempts
to create a similarity between the Holocaust and the Armenian
allegations. Nothing similar to the Holocaust occurred. What the
Armenians went through is a tragedy, but not genocide."

The matter has suddenly become an issue in Watertown, Mass. a suburb
of Boston that is home to some 8,000 Armenians. There, a challenge
has been mounted against ADL’s "No Place For Hate" program, a popular
anti-bigotry campaign in which hundreds of communities around the
nation participate. Cyberspace is now filled with criticism of Abe
Foxman, ADL’s executive, who recently said, "This [the genocide] is
not an issue where we take a position one way or the other."

It is not possible to believe that he is unaware of the relevant
history. And that raises a number of pressing questions: At what
point do we allow Israel’s raisons d’etat to override the sober and
sobering truth? There’s a long record on this one, going back to
Israel’s efforts to impose silence on American Jews regarding the
plight of Soviet Jewry, regarding our views of the junta in
Argentina, even regarding the war in Vietnam.

Does not the outrageous stubbornness of Turkey require that Turkey’s
friends and allies seek to persuade the Turkish government that would
be a mature and cleansing act for Turkey at long last to lay open the
record and deal frankly with its past, as so many other have done and
are doing? Would not such candor raise Turkey’s reputation in the
family of nations?

Leonard Fein is a Boston-based columnist

3840/

http://www.jewishexponent.com/article/1

BAKU: Iosif Shagal: Israel position on `Armenian genocide’ unchanged

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Aug 24 2007

Iosif Shagal: Israel’s position on `Armenian genocide’ has not changed

[ 24 Aug 2007 18:02 ]

Israeli Foreign Ministry has officially replied to Turkey’s request
of explanation of the US influential Jewish organization,
Anti-Defamation League stating it will recognize so-called Armenian
genocide. Israeli parliament member, president of Israel-Azerbaijan
International Association, Iosif Shagal told APA. He said in its
reply the foreign ministry stated that ADL is an independent body.
`As to Israel’s position, it has not recognized `Armenian genocide’,
and its position regarding that has not changed.’
The parliamentarian reminded that Turkey asked Israel to address this
problem using its influence on the US Jewish lobby. Mr.Shagal said
the events in the US caused by the influence of Armenian diaspora
adding that ADL’s statement to recognize `Armenian genocide’ was
unexpected.
Commenting on the question whether ADL’s statement would harms the
relations of Israel with Turkey and Azerbaijan the parliamentarian
said this might cause certain instability but there exist strategic
partnership relations between these countries, `These relations are
not formal but have fundamental, deep bases. I think we can solve all
problems together,’ he stressed./APA/

Georgian Daily On "Steadily Growing" Number Of Armenians In Abkhazia

GEORGIAN DAILY ON "STEADILY GROWING" NUMBER OF ARMENIANS IN ABKHAZIA

Rezonansi
18 Aug 07
Tbilisi

There has been a stable growth in the number of ethnic Armenians in
Abkhazia since the 1992-1993 Georgian-Abkhaz war, Georgian newspaper
Rezonansi says.

According to Rezonansi, the strengthening Armenian diaspora has
expressed its wish to be involved in Abkhazia’s political life. The
report says that ethnic Armenians own 80 per cent of small and medium
business in Abkhazia.

Conflictologist Giorgi Khutsishvili says that Armenians are "in
control" of Gagra District. Mamuka Areshidze, expert in Caucasus
affairs, says that the Abkhaz often "oppress" Armenians as they are
"angered" by their business activities. MP Van Baiburt says that
there are "very few" Armenians in Abkhazia. The following is the
text of report by Elza Tsiklauri in Georgian newspaper Rezonansi on
18 August headlined "Armenians control 80 per cent of businesses in
Gagra". Subheadings have been inserted editorially:

The number of ethnic Armenians in Abkhazia has been steadily growing
since the Georgian-Abkhaz armed conflict [in 1992-1993]. Naturally,
this causes their automatic involvement in the political as well as
business and economic life. Although there are not too many ethnic
Armenians in the de facto government agencies – they have only three
representatives in the 35-seat "People’s Assembly" – the Armenians’
share of businesses has been increasing every year. Such activeness
has been especially noticeable in Gagra, one of Abkhazia’s profitable
districts, but the Armenians have businesses throughout the de facto
republic’s territory. For example, ethnic Armenians own 80 per cent
of all small and medium-sized businesses in Abkhazia.

Growing diaspora

According to unofficial information, there between 65,000 and 68,000
Abkhaz and approximately as many Georgians living in Abkhazia today. As
for Armenians, their number ranges between 70,000 and 80,000. There
are various factors for the growth of the Armenian diaspora in
Abkhazia. For example, after the Georgian-Abkhaz armed conflict,
an intensive settlement of Armenian population started on Abkhaz
territory, especially in northern Abkhazia. After the town of Gagra
and Gagra District, Armenians appeared in Akhali Atoni and adjacent
territories. Later on, Armenians started settling in Gudauta District
as well.

It is also noteworthy that the Armenian diaspora in Abkhazia increased
in numbers after the serious persecution of ethnic minorities started
in [Russia’s] Krasnodar [Territory]. Since the Armenians who were
oppressed in Krasnodar have nowhere else to go, they mainly go to
Abkhazia. According to unofficial information, if there is a national
group that is growing in Abkhazia today, it is the Armenian one. The
number of ethnic Armenian population increases by 5,000-6,000 people
every year.

A more important circumstance is that Abkhazia’s Armenians have been
gaining a lot of strength of late, expressing a wish to be actively
involved in the de facto republic’s political life. This is precisely
why a new party, the Russian Citizens’ Union, was created in Sukhumi
before the separatist parliamentary election. As a result, the party
activists or simply the supporters of this party’s ideology achieved,
let us say, serious success in this election. Three ethnic Armenians,
Valeriy Mayromyan, Sergey Matosyan and Albert Ovsepyan, got into the
"People’s Assembly".

It is also noteworthy that, as soon as the incumbent "People’s
Assembly" started working, "President" [Sergey] Bagapsh allowed
the creation of an additional deputy chairman’s post especially
for Ovsepyan.

Even though such a large-scale growth of the Armenian diaspora is not
really acceptable to the Abkhaz public and neither are the Abkhaz
especially pleased with the flourishing of Armenian businesses,
there are certain reasons why the de facto government prefers to keep
silent. One of the factors why the Abkhaz public prefers to keep
silence is the activities of the so-called Bagramyan’s battalion
during the Georgian-Abkhaz armed conflict. It is well known that
ethnic Armenians still remind Sukhumi of this battalion’s actions.

"Balanced" Abkhaz-Armenian relations

Georgian experts too are unanimous in saying that ethnic Armenians
are gradually gaining strength in Abkhazia.

"Armenians are virtually in control of Gagra District today. They
own almost 90 per cent of the businesses there. They are involved in
construction, tourism and trade activities. Apparently, the Armenians
have already taken control of one concrete district which, one can say,
is quite lucrative. The Abkhaz do care about the lack of demographic
balance prevailing in Gagra District but they are not talking about
it openly. It has to be said that relations between ethnic Armenians
and the Abkhaz are quite balanced today.

However, people in Abkhazia also fear that they will become a minority
in their own land, returning to the state of affairs of 1991-1992.

"Nevertheless, no-one in Abkhazia can oppose the Armenian
activeness. They [Armenians] always remind the Abkhaz of their role
during the Georgian-Abkhaz combat operations. They always talk about
the achievements of Bagramyan’s battalion. Armenians are very good at
taking advantage of this," Giorgi Khutsishvili, conflictologist [and
head of the International Centre of Conflict and Negotiation NGO],
said in an interview with Rezonansi.

Mamuka Areshidze, who is an expert in Caucasus affairs, confirmed
that Armenian businesses in Abkhazia are growing year after year:
"It cannot be ruled out that 80 per cent of the Abkhaz economy is
precisely under control of ethnic Armenian business structures. Company
directors may often be Abkhaz but the capital would be entirely
Armenian. I am not talking about business with international flair,
for example, Moscow chocolate factory, these are businesses of a
completely different level.

"As for oppressing them, such danger is always present. Today Armenians
in Abkhazia are in the same situation as the rich Jewish financial
groups who were not really protected in medieval France, Italy and
Spain. The Abkhaz are angered by the Armenian business activities,
which is why they often oppress them but there are more of them than
Abkhaz and they are better organized. Incidentally, this is why
Bagapsh is compelled to consider their interests and stop talking
about settlement of Muhajirs [Abkhazians exiled from the Russian
Empire to Muslim countries in the late 19th century]," Areshidze said.

Areshidze also talked about the influence of Bagramyan’s battalion,
saying that Armenians still remind Abkhaz of this battalion’s
activities during the war: "Armenians tell the Abkhaz that, if it
was not for that battalion, they would not have been where they are
today. They keep reminding Abkhaz of this, telling them that they
should be grateful.

"It also has to be noted here that Bagramyan’s battalion was
formed because of our ignorance and stupidity. However, they would
not have been able to do anything solely with this battalion’s
actions. Armenians have money and if you have money, you can manipulate
society," Areshidze added.

Unlike Georgian experts, Georgian MP [of Armenian origin] Van Baiburt
called the talk about the strengthening of the Armenian diaspora in
Abkhazia absurd. He said that ethnic Armenians do not account for
more than 40 per cent of the Gagra population.

"Armenians do not have significant businesses in Abkhazia. They
do not own petrol stations or other large companies. They are only
trading. In addition, very few Armenians remained there after the
war. An Armenian language school in Gagra can serve as an example:
before the war, there were over 1,500 children studying there. Today
this number hardly amounts to 300.

I often meet relatives of people who live there in Yerevan and I
know that their situation there is not as good as to boast about,"
Van Baiburt told Rezonansi.

What Will The First President Be Doing?

WHAT WILL THE FIRST PRESIDENT BE DOING?

Lragir.am
22-08-2007 15:07:06

"It does not occur to anyone what they will be doing if they
are elected," said Shavarsh Kocharyan, the leader of the National
Democratic Party, who met with reporters on August 22 at the Friday
Club. He spoke about the developments related to the presidential
election of 2008, namely the expediency of nomination of Levon
Ter-Petrosyan. "Why does he return? What is his program? One thing
is evident to all of us. We remember from his speeches and moves that
he will return Karabakh. What else will he be doing? Nobody asks this
question," Shavarsh Kocharyan says.

He is sensitive about the argument the proponents of Ter-Petrosyan’s
return offer. "They say if he comes, the government will divide,
and part of the government will support him and thereby opportunities
will rise.

What does it mean? It means that part of the opposition completely
ignores people and relies on a suggested divide in the government
which would enable them to put up their representative," Shavarsh
Kocharyan says.

Meanwhile, he says the problem is that presently the government
of Robert Kocharyan and Serge Sargsyan serves best the clans,
the oligarchs who hold real power and underlie the government of
Kocharyan and Sargsyan. Shavarsh Kocharyan thinks the arguments for
Ter-Petrosyan’s return imply that Ter-Petrosyan will serve the clans
better. The leader of the National Democratic Party is convinced
that this is a message of the apologists of the return of the first
president to the clans.

No Matter Abdula Gyul Becomes The Turkish President Or Not, This Wil

NO MATTER ABDULA GYUL BECOMES THE TURKISH PRESIDENT OR NOT, THIS WILL NOT INFLUENCE ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS, AN AMERICAN ANALYST THINKS

arminfo
2007-08-22 08:55:00

No matter Abdula Gyul becomes the Turkish president or not, this will
not influence Armenian-Turkish relations, American analyst Richard
Kirakosian said at a press conference on Tuesday.

According to him, even if A. Gyul wins in the second round of the
presidential election in Turkey, this will leave no mark on the
Armenian-Turkish relations. ‘The main problem of the Armenian-Turkish
relations is not in individuals but in the strategies of the two
countries’, he noted. R. Kirakosyan emphasized that Armenia’s main
challenge is that it’s surrounded by unpredictable countries. ‘For this
very reason Armenia must become a more powerful state in order to be
able withstand any challenges’, he said. R. Kirakosian also thinks
that if Turkey enters into EU, this process will have a positive
impact on Armenia.

Chapman To Present Holocaust Lecture Series

CHAPMAN TO PRESENT HOLOCAUST LECTURE SERIES

Orange County Register, CA
free-1816336-hall-memorial
Aug 21 2007

The theme for the series is ‘History as Witness to the Future.’

THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

ORANGE Chapman University’s annual Holocaust Lecture Series, presented
by the school’s Rodgers Center for Holocaust Education, will focus
this year on the preservation of memories as a crucial component of
historical witness.

Under the theme "Saving Memories: History As Witness to the Future,"
speakers will cover such varied topics as the remembering the Armenian
genocide, preservation of cultural memories in rescued Yiddish books,
and filmed memories.

The year will culminate with an event focusing on the passing of
memories to a new generation (the annual Holocaust Art and Writing
Contest, involving hundreds of high school and middle school students)
and Chapman’s annual Evening of Holocaust Remembrance ceremony.

All events are free of charge and open to the public.

Call 714-628-7377 or go to for
more information.

The events:

Aug. 29 at 7 p.m. -"Buchenwald and Beyond: One Boy’s Story of Humanity
and Hope," lecture by Robert Waisman, teen survivor of the Buchenwald
concentration camp and today a retired businessman. Also features
a screening of the award-winning documentary film "The Boys of
Buchenwald." Memorial Hall, Chapman University, Orange. Admission:
free, by ticket only (this is an event aimed at Chapman students,
and any remaining tickets will be available to the public on the day
of the lecture at the Will Call table, starting at 6:15 p.m.)

Sept. 25 at 7 p.m.- "Must We Still Remember? The Armenian Genocide
as Prototype," lecture by Dr. Richard G. Hovannisian, professor
of Armenian and Near Eastern history and holder of the Armenian
Educational Foundation Chair in Modern Armenian History at UCLA. Bush
Conference Center, 404 Beckman Hall. Admission: free.

Oct. 9 at 7 p.m. – "Don’t You Know That Yiddish is Dead? How the
Last-Minute Rescue of Yiddish Books is Breathing New Life into Modern
Jewish Culture," lecture by Aaron Lansky, founder and president of
the National Yiddish Book Center, MacArthur Fellow and author of
Outwitting History: The Amazing Adventures of a Man Who Rescued a
Million Yiddish Books. Memorial Hall. Admission: free

Nov. 13 at 7 p.m. -"They Were My Neighbors: Jewish Survivors and Their
Rescuers in the Holocaust," lecture by Douglas Greenberg, professor
of history and executive director of the Shoah Foundation Institute
for Visual History and Education at USC. Memorial Hall.

Admission: free

Feb. 12 at 7 p.m.- Screening of the documentary Swimming in Auschwitz,
followed by conversation with writer/director/producer Jon Kean and
Auschwitz survivor Renee Firestone. Memorial Hall.

Admission: free.

March 7 at 11 a.m. -Awards Ceremony: The Ninth Annual Holocaust
Art and Writing Contest. Hundreds of Southern California middle and
high school students and their teachers and parents gather at the
culmination of the annual student writing and art contest presented
by Chapman’s Rodgers Center for Holocaust Education in partnership
with The "1939" Club. Following the awards presentation, participants
have the opportunity to meet and converse with Holocaust survivors.

Memorial Hall. Admission: free (public seating extremely limited).

April 29 at 7 p.m. -An Evening of Holocaust Remembrance. Solemn
commemoration in music and words, remembering the victims of the
Holocaust, including a candle-lighting ceremony representing the
Chapman community’s commitment to remembrance and to witness.

Memorial Hall. Admission: free.

The Jerry and Sally Schwartz Holocaust Lecture Series is funded by
the Jerry and Sally Schwartz Holocaust Education Fund, managed by
the Community Foundation of the Jewish Federation of Orange County,
in cooperation with the Jewish Community Center of Orange County.

The "1939" Club Lecture Series is made possible by The "1939" Club,
a Holocaust survivor organization. The "1939" Club’s Leopold Page
Memorial Righteous Rescuers Lecture Series is funded by a grant from
Steven Spielberg’s Righteous Persons Foundation; Mr. Page, number 173
on Schindler’s "List," was a founding member and president of The
"1939" Club, one of the largest and most active Holocaust survivor
organizations in the United States.

The Stan Ross Visiting Scholar in Holocaust History is made possible
by a gift from Stan Ross.

http://www.ocregister.com/news/holocaust-lecture-
www.chapman.edu/holocausteducation

Ex-Karabakh Leader Set For Party Merger

EX-KARABAKH LEADER SET FOR PARTY MERGER
By Anna Saghabalian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Aug 21 2007

An Armenian party led by Samvel Babayan, Nagorno-Karabakh’s former
military leader, confirmed on Tuesday reports that it is set to merge
with two other political groups ahead of next year’s presidential
election.

According to the Yerevan daily "Haykakan Zhamanak," Babayan’s Dashink
party as well as the Diaspora-linked Ramkavar Azatakan (HRAK) and
the opposition National Revival parties are holding negotiations
on such a merger and are close to agreement. The paper said the new
organization will bear the HRAK’s name and be led by Babayan.

Representatives of the three parties essentially confirmed the
information, even if they cautioned that the talks are sill going on.

Gnel Ghlechian, a senior member of Dashink, said his party will likely
meet for an extraordinary congress in late September to formally agree
to merging into the HRAK. He said the move would stem from Babayan’s
and his allies’ belief that the Armenian opposition is too fragmented
to pose a serious threat to the government and must consolidate.

"This unification, which I hope will materialize, is the way to go
for all parties," Ghlechian told RFE/RL.

"At this point there is only an intention, a desire to see political
forces in Armenia unite on the basis of ideological similarities,"
said Albert Bazeyan, a prominent politician who leads National
Revival. "We have not yet taken any concrete steps in that direction."

None of the three parties cleared the 5 percent vote threshold to win
seats in parliament under the system of proportional representation
in the May 12 elections. Dashink won a single parliament seat in a
constituency in northwestern Armenia, while the two other parties
are not represented in the current National Assembly at all.

Ghlechian would not say if Babayan, who commanded the Karabakh Armenian
army from 1993-1999, expects to be the top leader of the new party. "It
is too early to speculate who will run it," he said.

Still, the HRAK chairman, Harutiun Arakelian, indicated that he
does not object to the former Karabakh strongman taking over the new
party. "I personally would not take such a development painfully,"
he told RFE/RL. "My task is to make the party stronger and to double
or triple the number of its members and structures."

The HRAK, which has an eponymous sister organization in the worldwide
Armenian Diaspora, has been loyal to President Robert Kocharian
throughout his nearly decade-long rule. Dashink and National Revival,
by contrast, claim to be in opposition to Kocharian.

It is not clear if the three parties plan to field a single
presidential candidate. Babayan stated recently that he has no
intention to run for president.

First Prize Winners Of Fourth All-Armenian Games Announced

FIRST PRIZE WINNERS OF FOURTH ALL-ARMENIAN GAMES ANNOUNCED

Noyan Tapan
Aug 20, 2007

YEREVAN, AUGUST 20, NOYAN TAPAN. Competitions of athlets took place at
Artashat’s stadium on August 19 by the program of the 4th All-Armenian
Games.

The prize winners became:

100-meter running race (men): 1. Johnny Ter-Eghian (Glendale, 10.3
sec), 2. Vahagn Javakhian (Yerevan, 10.4 sec), 3. Alexander Abrahamian
(Yerevan, 10.6 sec).

100-meter running race (women): 1. Ani Khachikian (Yerevan, 12.1
sec), 2.

Anna Kochinian (Vanadzor, 12.2 sec), 3. Lilit Manucharian (Vanadzor,
12.3 sec).

400-meter running race (women): 1. Gayane Bulghudarian (Vanadzor,
57.9 sec), 2. Amalia Sharoyan (Yerevan, 58.4 sec), 3. Marine Musaelian
(Stepanakert, 1 min 0.05 sec).

400-meter running race (men): 1. Eduard Mangat (Tehran, 47.9 sec),
2. Aram Davtian (Artashat, 48.3 sec), 3. Endrik Mkoyan-Zilberstein
(Akhaltskha, 49.3 sec).

1,500-meter running race (women): 1. Anna Yegorian (Yerevan, 4 min 55.1
sec), 2. Marine Poghosian (Kapan, 5 min 0.6 sec), 3. Zaruhi Yegorian
(Yerevan, 5 min 6.2 sec).

1,500-meter running race (men): 1. Gigla Mkoyan-Zilberstein
(Akhaltskha, 4 min), 2. Ashot Hayrapetian (Stepanakert, 4 min 0.4 sec),
3. Armen Asrian (Stepanakert, 4 min 5.4 sec).

Long jump (women): 1. Haykanush Beklarian (Kapan, 567 cm), 2. Marine
Harutyunian (Kapan, 555 cm), 3. Nadezhda Zakarian (Vanadzor, 536 cm).

Shot-put (men): 1. Benik Abramian (Tbilisi, 15 m 76 cm), 2. Aram
Sahakian (Yerevan, 14 m 30 cm), 3. Sos Meliksetian (Abovian, 14 m
16 cm).

Parallel Olympic Torch Relay Highlights Ongoing Genocide

OneWorld.net, UK
Aug 18 2007

Parallel Olympic Torch Relay Highlights Ongoing Genocide

Haider Rizvi
OneWorld US
Sat., Aug. 18, 2007

COPENHAGEN, Aug 18 (OneWorld) – Though China would like to be seen at
the next Olympics as a major world power that stands for
international peace, an Olympic-style torch relay that began in
Africa this week is painting a different picture of the giant Asian
nation.

Two survivors of the Rwandan genocide pass the torch in Kigali,
Rwanda. © Dream for Darfur
Come next summer when the games begin in Beijing, a series of
worldwide protests are expected to highlight China’s role in
perpetuating the bloody conflict in the Sudanese region of Darfur.

The torch relay, which was launched by actress and Darfur activist
Mia Farrow at a refugee camp in Chad — just three miles from the
Darfur border — is part of an effort to demand China withdraw its
support for the Sudanese government and help enhance international
efforts to restore peace in Darfur.

Organizers say the torch will change hands in various cities
worldwide that have experienced conflict and genocide before it
reaches its culmination point in Beijing by the end of the year.

Farrow was also on hand Wednesday when Rwandan genocide survivors led
a torch lighting ceremony at the entrance of a school where 2,000
Rwandans were murdered in 1994.

The theme for the 2008 Olympics, which is now less than a year away,
is "One World, One Dream."

"As China prepares to host the Olympics and waves the banner of peace
and brotherhood, it is failing to help bring this dream to Darfur,"
according to the independent group Dream for Darfur, which organized
the torch rally along with other organizations.

In a statement, the group held China responsible for the
deteriorating situation in Darfur because it hasn’t tried to use the
influence it has with the Sudanese government. Its activists believe
that China can play a critical role in ending the carnage in Darfur
but so far has failed to do enough.

China is thought to purchase as much as 70 percent of Sudan’s oil and
has at least $3 billion invested in the Sudanese energy sector.

After lighting the torch, Mia Farrow and an 8-year-old Darfuri
refugee walk into a sandstorm. © Dream for Darfur
As part of their efforts to remind China of its responsibility to
help restore peace in Darfur, organizers said those participating in
the torch relay will travel around the world, visiting sites of
previous genocides in Rwanda, Armenia, Bosnia, Germany, and Cambodia.

Activists from a number of organizations, including Dream for Darfur,
the Save Darfur Coalition, and STAND, said next month they will start
another torch journey in the United States, which will cover as many
as 25 cities nationwide.

In the United States, some critics of China’s policy on Darfur are
also calling for extreme actions including a boycott of the 2008
Summer Olympics.

Early this month, a U.S. lawmaker introduced a congressional
resolution calling for the United States to withdraw its
participation in the Beijing Olympics.

In House Resolution 628, Rep. Maxine Waters urged President Bush to
take action to boycott the games unless the Chinese government
acknowledges and condemns the atrocities against blacks in Darfur,
Sudan.

The resolution also insists that China must withdraw all military and
economic support for the government in Khartoum, which is suspected
of backing Arab militias responsible for armed attacks against the
indigenous communities in Darfur.

In Darfur, more than 200,000 people have been killed and at least 2
million others displaced since 2003 when the armed conflict began
between rebel groups from ethnic African tribes and Khartoum-backed
Janjaweed militias.

"We shouldn’t put a price on the lives of human beings," said Tim
Nonn of the Dear Sudan group, which supports Waters’ resolution. "No
price is high enough for a human life — whether it’s oil going to
China, or slavery in America."

Waters believes that China’s reluctance to be tough on Sudan is
linked to its long-standing military and economic ties to the regime
in Khartoum.

China has exported at least $24 million in arms and ammunition to
Sudan, as well as nearly $57 million in parts and aircraft equipment
and $2 million in helicopter and airplane parts, noted Waters’ chief
of staff Mikael Moore in a recent interview with Wave newspapers.

"China is the world’s largest provider of military arms and equipment
to Sudan," Waters said in a statement. "China continues to
provide…equipment to Sudan, despite the fact Sudan is using these
supplies to commit genocide in Darfur."

This year and before, time and again, the Bush administration tried
to threaten Sudan with economic sanctions, but both China and Russia
opposed such strict measures at the UN Security Council, where both
countries enjoy veto powers.

However, earlier this month, both China and Russia went along with
the United States and other countries’ proposal to send a
26,000-strong UN force to Darfur.

Many observers believe China’s acquiescence was due, at least in
part, to the activist pressure brought to bear on the nation as it
attempts to purify its image ahead of next year’s Olympic games.

UN officials say the troop deployment could still take several months
to implement.

Meanwhile, according to the UN, while Darfuris await the troops’
deployment, vast numbers of villagers — as well as humanitarian aid
workers — continue to face armed attacks by militias.