Armprodexpo-2008 International Food Exhibition To Be Held In Armenia

ARMPRODEXPO-2008 INTERNATIONAL FOOD EXHIBITION TO BE HELD IN ARMENIA ON NOV 11-14

ARKA
Nov 10, 2008

YEREVAN, November 10. /ARKA/. Armprodexpo-2008 eighth international
food exhibition is to be held in Armenia on November 11-14. The best
products of the country’s food industry are to be presented on the
exhibition, the Agribusiness Development Center told ARKA Agency.

Among participants of the exhibition are food processing companies,
local and foreign trade organizations, advertisement agencies and
mass media outlets.

The exhibition is organized by the country’s Ministry of Agriculture,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Yerevan Municipality, Chamber of Trade
and Commerce and Agribusiness Development Center closed joint stock
company.

David Harutyunyan: Karabakh Issue Is In The Stage Of Negotiations

DAVID HARUTYUNYAN: KARABAKH ISSUE IS IN THE STAGE OF NEGOTIATIONS

armradio.am
05.11.2008 17:42

The "Heritage" Party, the Armenian National Congress and the Ombudsman
have already named the candidates to be included in the Fact-Finding
Group of Experts to probe into the events of March 1-2. The coalition
has not nominated its candidates yet. According to the Chairman of
the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on State-Legal Issues David
Harutyunyan, the first important issue is the nomination of candidates.

"I think the nomination of candidates is being delayed because the
requirements are very high. It should be a skillful and capable person
on one hand, and not be a political figure on the other hand.

David Harutyunyan also heads the Armenian delegation to the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Our country is
preparing for PACE winter session. According to him, the January
session has peculiarities. When joining the Council of Europe,
Armenia assumed a number of responsibilities and is still in the
stage of monitoring. This means that PACE periodically refers to tie
accomplishment of Armenia’s commitments.

In January PACE will not only refer to Resolutions 1609 and 1620,
but also other commitments assumed by our country, i.e. reformation
of judicial reforms, presentation of the final draft law on "Local
self-government and territorial administration in Yerevan." The
bill has already been adopted by the National Assembly at first
reading. Currently the preparation of the second reading is underway.

David Harutyunyan spoke about the declaration on Nagorno Karabakh
signed in Moscow by the Presidents of Armenia, Azerbaijan and
Russia. David Harutyunyan appreciates the step and does not agree
with the opinion that with this declaration Nagorno Karabakh stays
apart from the negotiation process. "The most important principle
included in the documents is te provision on peace talks, and peace
talks on the destiny of Karabakh are impossible without the active
participation of NKR."

Describing the current stage of the Karabakh conflict settlement, David
Harutyunyan noted: "We are currently in the stage of negotiations,
i.e. both parties should have the opportunity to yeld and gain
territories."

"Nagorno Karabakh Will Not Stay Apart"

"NAGORNO-KARABAKH WILL NOT STAY APART"

A1+
[04:23 pm] 05 November, 2008

"I can only make a positive assessment of the Moscow trilateral
declaration regarding the Karabakh conflict resolution. I don’t share
the prevalent belief that Karabakh is left out of the negotiation
process," the head of the Armenian delegation to the PACE and
Chairman of the NA Standing Committee on State and Legal Affair,
Davit Harutiunyan, said to A1+ on November 5.

"Political negotiations are impossible without Karabakh’s engagement
in the talks. I find the declaration an important achievement. After
the Ossetian events everyone realised that the war is not the right
solution to the conflict settlement. The war even leads the issue to
a deadlock where it is far more difficult to find a way out. I think
that the Ossetian war taught everyone a good lesson. The declaration
evidences that we are stepping a rational phase where the sides are
ready to cede and benefit. There are neither winners nor losers in
the process of negotiations. The settlement of the Karabakh conflict
is excluded without Karabakh’s involvement.

Today Davit Harutiunyan also spoke about the implementation of PACE
Resolutions 1609 and 1620 and PACE’s demand to free people detained
for their political views, in particular those imprisoned on the
basis of policemen’s evidence.

"I think the best way to solve the issue of people arrested or
imprisoned after the March 1 events is amnesty," he said. In reply
to the question why Serzh Sargsyan hasn’t granted amnesty yet, Davit
Harutiunyan said, "It is within the authorities of the president,
and I do not know the reasons."

"All detainees who have not pleaded guilty though their verdicts have
been announced are also eligible for amnesty. And all those who have
not been convicted yet may reject general pardon and have their case
go for trial because they are sure to be acquitted. If nevertheless
the court does not acquit them, they will be pardoned.

Saying that the best solution is amnesty, Davit Harutiunyan also
noted that there is time for other solutions as well. When asked to
detail those solutions, Harutiunyan said pardon could be a solution
or the court of cassation which sets the rules of the game regarding
the application of the law may decide in which case the testimony of
a policeman is acceptable and in which case it is not. If the court
doesn’t justify the arrestee it doesn’t mean he cannot be pardoned.

Davit Harutiunyan noted that Armenian has received recommendations
from the PACE which can be either accepted or denied but at present
they don’t think it expedient to deny them.

Camp Darfur To Fight Genocide

CAMP DARFUR TO FIGHT GENOCIDE

The UCLA Daily Bruin
Nov 5 2008
CA

November is Genocide Awareness Month. As a result, the Darfur Action
Committee (DAC) is holding events throughout the month to educate and
inspire students against genocide and the ongoing conflict in Darfur.

Today in Wilson Plaza, the DAC will present Camp Darfur, a series of
tents modeled after refugee camps.

Each interactive tent will represent historic genocides including
Armenia, Cambodia, Rwanda and the Holocaust.

Participants will gain insight through photographs, videos and
testimonies from actual camp visitors.

Kristen Savage, the DAC’s Publicity Committee Chair, said, "These
events create common ground. They put names and faces to the sheer
numbers."

On Thursday, the DAC will screen "God Grew Tired of Us," a documentary
following three of the Lost Boys of Sudan who fled wars in the 1980s
and escaped to America. The screening will take place in the Kerckhoff
Art Gallery at 1 p.m.

Tiffany Man, the DAC’s Event Programming Committee Chair, emphasized
that this film helps students understand how the Sudanese Civil War
has affected and continues to affect genocide in Darfur today.

Finally, the DAC, along with the American Indian Students Association,
will sponsor American Indian Awareness Day on Nov. 25.

Accordingly, they will screen "The Canary Effect: Kill the Indian,
Save the Man," on Nov. 25.

This documentary traces the history of the United States government’s
abuse and genocide of American Indians.

The DAC members each possess a unique reason for their passion about
genocide awareness.

"It is outrageous that in the modern world, nothing has been done,"
said Anjana Puri, the DAC’s outreach and external relations co-head.

Savage added that stopping genocide in Darfur is a pressing issue
because basic human rights have been violated atrociously.

"This crosses cultural, racial and socioeconomic lines," she said. "We
need to take a stand against genocide,"

Man’s reason for involvement springs from an ability to relate to
the persecuted.

"The victims are similar to us. They have family and friends too,
but they live in constant danger and fear.

"We need to experience their pains and triumphs and realize our common
humanity," she explained.

Members of the DAC offered the following advice to students who wish
to promote awareness and peace in Darfur: Educate yourself and others,
lobby officials to affect change, vote for candidates who will help
Darfur, and donate money to organizations like the Red Cross, Amnesty
International, or the Jewish World Watch’s Solar Cooker Project.

The Jewish World Watch’s Solar Cooker Project is an organization that
allows refugees to prepare meals with solar cookers near their homes.

Puri, the Director of High School Activism Outreach Project, further
encouraged educating high school students about genocide so that they
may in turn spread knowledge within their communities.

Savage emphasized that the DAC needs volunteers of all commitment
levels, whether large or small.

"We have grown incredibly in the past year, and we hope to see it grow
even more," she said. "We want not only to educate, but to engage."

ANCA: Obama-Biden Victory Powerful Opportunity For U.S. Recognition

ANCA: OBAMA-BIDEN VICTORY POWERFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR U.S. RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.11.2008 13:52 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA)
welcomed President-elect Barack Obama and Vice-President-elect Joe
Biden’s historic win as a new and powerful opportunity for American
recognition of the Armenian Genocide, stronger U.S.-Armenia relations,
and U.S. support for a settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
that respects its citizens’ right to self-determination, the ANCA
told PanARMENIAN.Net.

The ANCA also welcomed the election yesterday of 94% of the
Congressional candidates it had endorsed in House and Senate races.

"The victory of Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden stands as a
testament to the strength of grassroots activism across the United
States committed to change," stated ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian.

"Starting with the ANCA’s endorsement of Senator Obama in January of
this year, Armenian Americans in battleground states – organized by
an extremely effective and far-reaching Armenians for Obama operation
– played a critical role in bringing Armenian American Democrats,
Independents and a surprisingly large percentage of Republicans
to the Obama-Biden ticket on Election Day. Our pre-election polls
showed between 80 and 85% support for Obama-Biden in our community,
a very strong showing, particularly in a community well represented
across the American political spectrum, and a testament to the fact
that Armenian Americans are willing to cross party lines to support
pro-Armenian candidates."

"In many ways, this election marked the emergence of the Armenian
American community as a powerful and broadly respected Presidential
election constituency, one that is able – through grassroots
efforts, campaign professionals, fundraising, media outreach, and
get-out-the-vote – to help tip the balance in a close national contest
toward the candidate best positioned to reflect our views and values,"
concluded Hachikian.

President-elect Obama was consistently strong in his outreach to
Armenian American voters, issuing a powerful statement in January,
2008, voicing his vigorous support for passage of the Armenian Genocide
Resolution and pledging that, as President, he would recognize the
Armenian Genocide. The Presidential hopeful also reaffirmed his
support for a strong "U.S.-Armenian relationship that advances our
common security and strengthens Armenian democracy." Unlike other
candidates, he also pledged to "promote Armenian security by seeking
an end to the Turkish and Azerbaijani blockades, and by working for
a lasting and durable settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
that is agreeable to all parties, and based upon America’s founding
commitment to the principles of democracy and self determination."

President-Elect Obama restated his pledge on two subsequent occasions,
the last one in the form of a fact sheet issued just four days before
the Presidential election, which stated in no uncertain terms "Barack
Obama strongly supports passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution
(H.Res.106 and S.Res.106) and will recognize the Armenian Genocide."

The Lost Paris of the Caucasus

Russia Profile, Russia
Nov 1 2008

The Lost Paris of the Caucasus

By Dmitry Babich
Russia Profile

The Natives of Azerbaijan’s Capital Thrive on all Continents

A Bakunian can be forced to leave Baku, but Baku can never be forced
out of a Bakunian.

Every day, Anna Tagiyeva, a 60-year-old Bakunian living and working in
Moscow, visits the Internet site, looking for old friends,
Baku news, or even relatives scattered all over the former Soviet
Union, the United States and Australia. This website is a meeting
place for people who live, were born in, or are somehow else
associated with Baku, the biggest and most ancient port on the Caspian
Sea and the capital of what is now the Republic of Azerbaijan. In the
earlier, happier years of Tagiyeva’s life, Baku was known as the
`Paris of the Caucuses,’ `the oil heart’ of the Soviet Union and the
capital of the Azerbaijani Soviet Socialist Republic’one of 15
constituent quasi-states which made up the Soviet Union and
which’unexpectedly even to CIA operatives’became independent in 1991.

For Tagiyeva, the collapse of the Soviet Union was not so
unexpected. An ethnic Armenian married to an Azerbaijani, she belonged
to the most unfortunate group of Baku residents, who became targets of
anti-Armenian pogroms in 1989 to 1990. The pogroms were the result of
an influx of Azerbaijani refugees from Nagorny Karabakh and other
territories that Armenians and Azerbaijanis started to dispute in
1987. Having lost the war in Karabakh, some desperate Azerbaijanis
turned their wrath against Armenians and other minorities in Baku.

`People were killed right on the street or inside their homes, in the
middle of the city’s ancient quarters, so that neighbors could see,’
Tagiyeva recalled. `When Soviet troops were moved in to stop the
pogroms in January 1990, most were already over. Families with at
least one Armenian member were evacuated to Moscow, because Armenia
was poor at the time and was not particularly keen to shelter us. Baku
Armenians spoke Russian much better than Armenian.’

Oleg Kriger, an expert in forensics from Moscow’s Institute of
Medico-Legal Research, who was sent to Baku in 1990 to study the
corpses of the pogroms’ victims, compared the pogroms in Baku to the
infamous night on the eve of St. Bartholomew’s day in Paris: `I had
been working with corpses of murdered people for 20 years before
coming to Baku, and I can tell you that I had never seen such badly
mutilated corpses. People were beaten to death by blocks of wood,
stones, knives, anything that the pogroms’ organizers could get their
hands on,’ he said.

Tagiyeva was one of the first Armenians evacuated to Moscow. She and
other escapees were secretly taken to the airport under heavy guard
and flown to Moscow, where even now, almost 20 years later, dozens of
refugee families continue to live in hotels, under the threat of
expulsion. Only recently did she venture to make a brief visit to her
native city, keeping as low a profile as possible.

`In 1989 and 1990 I made a lot of noise. I made phone calls to the
Soviet parliament, wrote to newspapers, warned about the danger of
pogroms,’ Tagiyeva said. `Some people may still remember that, so I
did not make much publicity about my visit. But I still have a lot of
friends among Azerbaijanis living in Baku and I don’t believe it was
the Bakunians who did this to us in 1990. It must have been the
Azerbaijani refugees from Armenia, the embittered and desperate
Yerazy.’

Yerazy, an abbreviation for `Yerevan Azerbaijanis,’ is a common name
Bakunians gave to Azerbaijanis who had lived in Armenia until the late
1980s, when the animosity between the two nations, suppressed under
Soviet rule, started to show its face again. Expelled from Armenia and
Karabakh by the Armenian nationalists, Yerazy became the shock troops
of anti-Armenian pogroms and Baku’s new inhabitants, not always
familiar with the city’s traditional cosmopolitan spirit. After the
expulsion of Armenians and other minorities, who did not feel secure
under the rule of the nationalist Popular Front, the ethnic
composition of Baku changed drastically. Azerbaijanis, who since the
19th century have been just one of the city’s three or four big
communities, now officially make up 88 percent of the city’s
population.

This is indeed a deviation from Baku’s old tradition of
multilingualism. Despite the fact that many Bakunians did remarkably
well after leaving the city, probably thanks to the city’s high
education standards, a lot of them refuse to recognize their old home
in an almost mono-ethnic modern metropolis. `I was born in Baku, but I
have no desire to visit,’ said Alexei Ganelin, the managing editor of
the Komsomolskaya Pravda daily, Russia’s most successful tabloid. `I
am an Armenian and when I grew up there, this was not important. I
don’t want to live in or even visit a city where this is important.’

But Some Bakunians are a bit more nostalgic. `The reflection of the
moon in the water is the most vivid of my impressions from my native
city,’ a Bakunian who identified herself as `Amerikanka’ wrote in her
posting on `Nowhere else did I see such a fusion of
silver and sea. I liked the new buildings that were being built. New
construction is so rapid that I almost lost myself. Thank God, there
was no problem with street names, which formally had been all changed
long ago. `We still call them Gorky Street and May Day Street,’ said
the Bakunians who followed me on my journey to childhood. In five or
six years of such restoration our Baku will be no worse than some
Madrid or Lisbon.’

Baku may indeed be turning into a more comfortable place to live in,
but whether it will retain the flavor of a meeting place for the East
and the West remains to be seen. The capital of a Turkic-speaking
former province of Iran, which had been under Russian rule since the
early 19th century and got a strong expat community involved in the
development of Caspian oilfields, Baku is a unique city whose history
does not belong to Azerbaijan alone.

`I lived in a house with an Italian patio in Myasnikov Street,’
Tagiyeva remembered. `Now that street is named after some general Ali
Abak, who is famous for I don’t know what. Myasnikov had a Russian
name, but he was one of the famous 26 Baku commissars, whom every
Bakunian learned about at school. Isn’t he also a part of Azerbaijan’s
history?’

`I still remember how we fled from our apartment on Chapayev Street in
January of 1990,’ said Evelina Zakamskaya, 32, a Bakunian now living
in Moscow and working as a television anchor on the Vesti 24
channel. `We lived in a building built in 1907, with a traditional
patio. There, it was indecent to eat `shashlik’ (grilled meat)
alone. You had to share with everyone or, having smelled the smoke,
the neighbors would think you were not a real Bakunian. And then, in
the morning after the day when Russian troops moved in to stop the
pogroms, I went to the street with my father. And we heard people
grunting behind our backs. The hint was that we were Russian pigs.’

The family packed and left the next day, leaving behind an apartment
which would have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars now, and all
belongings that could not fit in two suitcases. In Moscow, Zakamskaya
and her family received official refugee IDs’one of the first in the
Soviet Union. Like hundreds of thousands of Russian returnees from the
former Soviet republics, the Zakamsky family had to go to some
provincial place’Moscow and other big cities did not have enough space
for the new exiles with a university education. The Zakamskys moved to
the village of Chelnovka in the Tver region. For five years, this
family of six lived in one small room.

`It was shocking, because in Baku I got used to living in a big
city. I went to a ballet school there, and although in 1989, the
Popular Front’s activists staged protests near our school chanting
that Azeri girls need not dance with naked legs, I still missed Baku
terribly, especially in my first years in Russia,’ Zakamskaya said.

Despite low standards at a village school, Zakamskaya managed to
graduate from the Tver State University and build a career as a
journalist. In 2005, she felt rich enough to afford a trip to
Baku. `When I came to our apartment, I found a woman who spoke no
Russian there,’ she said. `I explained to her in Azerbaijani who I was
and she allowed me to have a look. Only one neighbor recognized
me’ironically, a woman whom we talked to less than anyone else. She
happened to be a good friend. She was very happy to talk about the old
times, because all the others left’Armenians, Russians, Jews. Recently
I learnt that our house will be razed in order to clear space for new
construction.’

Zakamskaya hired an Azerbaijani nanny for her daughter, and feels a
pang of pleasure every time she meets a Bakunian, even though she has
no plans or even dreams of returning. `My granny spent all her life in
Azerbaijan and even had a job in the government staff, but she started
saving money for our move to Leningrad years before the pogroms
began,’ Zakamskaya recalled. `Sooner or later, the old multiethnic
Baku had to become history. Russians who stayed in Baku now appear to
be sidelined and generally keep a low profile. There were a few guys
from our ballet school who returned after the anti-Russian sentiment
subsided in the mid-1990s, but they were not particularly
successful. We were lucky to catch a glimpse of the magnificent old
Baku before leaving.’

Alexander Pogosov, a 45-year-old Bakunian turned Muscovite 19 years
ago, has similar feelings. `Baku was indeed unique, it was almost too
good to survive,’ Pogosov said. `It combined all the things that were
good about the old Soviet Union’education, social protection, close
human ties’with Asian hospitality and informality. A Moslem republic
with no anti-Semitism’where can you find this now? An Oriental bazaar
and classical ballet and opera theaters on two sides of one
street’where else could you find it?’

In Pogosov’s opinion, Bakunians all over the world form a closer
community than any ethnic or religious group. Russian Bakunians
recognize Azeri Bakunians by a special way of pronouncing Russian
words, and Jewish Bakunians formed entire communities in such areas as
cinema and television’probably due to their strong positions at Baku
film studios’one of the best in the former Soviet Union.

So, what is the main trait that keeps Bakunians all together,
irrespective of ethnic origin or social class? `I think it is the
tradition to help each other,’ said Tagiyeva. `Helping each other and
speaking good Russian’not the one that is spoken in Moscow. This is
what Bakunians are primarily about.’

Photo: courtesy of the Zakamsky family

id=Themes&cont=c1225535432&articleid=a1225 537107

http://www.russiaprofile.org/page.php?page
www.baku.ru
www.baku.ru.

ANTELIAS: HH Aram I arrives in the Armenian Diocese of Tehran

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version: nian.htm

HIS HOLINESS ARAM I ARRIVES IN THE ARMENIAN DIOCESE OF TEHRAN

His Holiness Aram I arrived in Tehran yesterday evening on a direct flight
from Beirut. In the airport’s VIP lounge in Tehran, His Holiness was greeted
by government officials, representatives from the department on the dialogue
of religions, the Primates of the three Dioceses of Iran, Archbishop Sebouh
Sarkisian (Primate of the Diocese of Tehran), Bishop Papken Tcharian
(Primate of the Diocese of Isfahan) and Bishop Neshan Topouzian (Primate of
the Diocese of Azerbaijan). The Ambassador of Armenia in Iran, Garen
Nazarian, the Armenian deputies in the Iranian Majles Kevork Vartanian and
Robert Peklarian as well as members of the Armenian Religious Assembly and
diocesan Council also welcomed the Pontiff upon his arrival at the airport.

In an interview with journalists, His Holiness Aram I explained the purpose
of his visit. "The main purpose of our meeting is to have the third meeting
on the dialogue of religions with the Islamic Republic of Iran’s department
on the dialogue of religions, cultures and civilizations. The first dialogue
meeting was held here about eight years ago on their invitation. The second
meeting was held about three years ago in the Catholicosate of Cilicia’s
Antelias headquarters. This is now the third meeting that will be held.
Therefore, we are here on an official invitation, however, we will also
participate in diocesan, communal and other events. In consultation with the
Primates of the Dioceses we particularly wanted to grab this opportunity to
preside over the special event dedicated to the Year of Christian Education
and to address the faithful on this unique occasion. Christian faith is the
basis of our nation’s survival. Therefore the spreading of spiritual and
moral values is important."

His Holiness Aram I’s visit to Tehran will coincide with diocesan and
communal events in the Diocese.

##
View the photos here:
tos/Photos318.htm
*****
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the dioceses of
the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of the
Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Arme
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Pho
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org

Commission Hails Turkey’s Role In Regional Stability

COMMISSION HAILS TURKEY’S ROLE IN REGIONAL STABILITY
Elitsa Vucheva

EUobserver.com
7025
Oct 31 2008
Belgium

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – Turkey’s role as promoter of regional
stability has improved in the last year, Brussels says in a draft
report on Turkey and the western Balkans’ progress towards the EU,
while stressing that Ankara still has a lot to do in a number of
areas before being judged fit to join the EU club.

"Turkey has played a constructive role in its neighbourhood and the
wider Middle East through active diplomacy," reads the draft of the
annual report seen by EUobserver.

"Following the crisis in Georgia, [Turkey] proposed a Caucasus
Stability and Co-operation Platform to promote dialogue between
the countries of that region. [Turkish] President Gul paid a visit
to Yerevan, the first visit ever of a Turkish president since the
independence of Armenia. Turkey undertook efforts as a mediator
between Israel and Syria and conducted a dialogue with Iran on the
nuclear issue," the draft report goes on.

Ankara has itself been stressing its role in maintaining regional
stability and has been multiplying initiatives in that respect lately
– including setting up the Caucasus Platform in the aftermath of the
Russia-Georgia conflict.

It says the platform’s objective is to establish regional conflict
resolution mechanisms and broader economic co-operation among the five
countries involved – Turkey, Russia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The EU has always insisted that good neighbourly relations are an
important pre-condition for any EU hopeful.

Additionally, "the development in the southern Caucasus also
highlighted Turkey’s strategic significance for the EU energy
security, particularly by diversifying supply routes, and underlined
the importance of closer energy co-operation between Turkey and the
EU," the commission says.

Nabucco – the EU-backed planned natural gas pipeline designed to
reduce energy dependency on Russia by transporting natural gas from
Turkey to Austria, via Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary – "is a key
element for this," Brussels underlines.

Same problems remain

Turkey has been an official candidate to join the EU since 1999 and
opened accession negotiations with the bloc in 2005.

But besides the progress noted, the commission says Ankara still has
a lot to do in many areas in order to be ready for EU membership.

Notably, "there has been no progress towards normalisation of
bilateral relations with the Republic of Cyprus. Turkey has not fully
implemented the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement and
has not removed all obstacles to free movement of goods, including
restrictions on direct transport links with Cyprus."

In 2005 Ankara signed a protocol to extend its customs union with the
EU to the 10 states that joined the bloc in 2004 – but still refuses
to open its ports to Cypriot ships. Several negotiations chapters
with the EU remain suspended because of this.

Turkey does not recognise the Greek government in the southern part
of the divided island, while at the same time is the only country to
recognise its northern Turkish section.

Earlier this year, commission President Barroso called the issue "the
main obstacle for significant progress in Turkey’s accession process."

In addition, reads the report, the country has still a lot to do to
fight corruption and organised crime. It has made "no progress on
alignment with European standards" as regards minority rights and it
needs to push administrative and political reforms further.

"Full civilian supervisory functions and parliamentary oversight
of defence expenditures need to be ensured. Senior members of the
armed forces have continued to make statements on issues going beyond
their remit," Brussels also says. The central role of the military
in Turkish society is often raised as a concern by the EU executive.

The final version of the report will be presented by the commission
on 5 November.

http://euobserver.com/15/2

BAKU: CE Director General Urges Azerbaijan To Continue Application O

CE DIRECTOR GENERAL URGES AZERBAIJAN TO CONTINUE APPLICATION OF DEMOCRATIC PRACTICE

Trend News Agency
Oct 29 2008
Azerbaijan

France, Strasburg, 29 October /TrendNews corr. A.Gasimova / Exclusive
interview of Trend News with the Council of Europe (CE) Director
General for Political Affairs Jean-Louis Laurens:

Question: What is your appraisal of the current level of cooperation
between Azerbaijan and the Council of Europe?

Answer: The cooperation between Azerbaijan and the Council of Europe is
developing at a high level and is based on mutual trust. Implementation
of the election action plan within the CE-Azerbaijan cooperation is
a bright example in this respect. This plan was an important element
enabling to hold elections in the most democratic conditions. As you
know, Ago Monitoring Group of the CE Ministerial Committee and PACE
exercises control over implementation of the CE commitments. Certainly,
there are still issues that must be solved, including freedom of
assembly, press, the issues related to political prisoners. Those are
questions pending their solution and the Government of Azerbaijan
should strive to fulfil all obligations set for it while joining
the organization.

Question: What distinguishes the 15 October presidential election in
Azerbaijan from the previous ones?

Answer: I can refer only to joint official statements of the
observation missions, that is, the PACE and the OSCE Office for
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Their statements indicate
the advancements in the elections and also emphasize that from
now on efforts will be made in the abovementioned areas. I think
the work carried out before the election in an effort to improve
democratic practices in institutional and legislation fields,
as well as elections, should be continued. This statement of the
election observation mission was made with a purpose to hold the
next elections – municipal elections in 2009, parliamentary – 2010,
in a democratic manner.

As to critical opinions related to the election, along with positive
aspects the official statement of the observation mission also includes
negative milestones. This is itself is an indication. Now I cannot
say anything about what decision PACE will make during the discussion
over the observation mission’s report. The practice is that this
report will be included in the agenda of the next plenary session of
the organization in January, as soon as it is considered by the PACE
Bureau. It would be premature to say whether there is criticism or
not. On the other hand, the chairman of the Ministerial Committee,
Swedish FM Carl Bildt spoke on the issue. I have nothing more to
add. We discussed at the secretariat the control over elections, and
there are ideas to continue the cooperation. The Azerbaijani delegation
to the CE expressed its readiness to cooperate to ensure democratic
manner of local and parliamentary elections. As to non-participation
of the opposition parties in the election, I can say that boycotting
has never been a correct and good policy. The "empty chair policy"
was not a good one. I cannot put myself in the place of the political
forces in Azerbaijan.

Question: Does the Council of Europe have another action plan on
Azerbaijan?

Answer: Still there is no ready plan. Still it is early. Both the
CE and the Government of Azerbaijan have the desire to continue
co-operation in this regard. Besides, in democracy there is a
pre-election stage and the post-election stage. We are always at the
pre-election stage and the post-stage elections. The principle of
democracy is to hold balanced and democratic elections at all levels –
presidential, parliamentary, municipal elections. Therefore, assistance
to the election and the desire to co-operate must be permanent. Indeed,
we will continue this. On the other hand, the development of the plan
with regards to the presidential election has not been completed yet.

We will make assessment of this plan, and afterwards, will design
proposals regarding next elections. Here the questions are the
media coverage of the elections, participation of all political
forces, legislation base because not all recommendations of the
Venice Commission have been realized. I cannot be more precise. These
questions will be discussed during the final report of the observation
election mission. In addition, there will be considered a question,
in what direction the discussions will take place with the Azerbaijani
side to continue co-operation.

Question: The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is an issue of concern for the
CE. What are the recommendations of the organization to precipitate
settlement of the conflict? At what level is the CE-European Union
cooperation on South Caucasus issues?

Answer: The OSCE Minsk Group is directly engaged in Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict. If the CE applies for conducting the expertise in various
fields so we will be prepared to answer. On the other hand, we jointly
with the EU, realize majority of projects concerning the South Caucuses
within the framework of a joint program. A meeting of CE Ministerial
Committee group of rapporteurs discussed on 23 October the document
‘On priorities of EU-CE cooperation’. Cooperation on South Caucasus
in this document takes the first place.

Question: When will the CE Secretary General pay visit to region
to survey the facts on destruction of cultural heritage in the
Nagorno-Karabakh and other Azerbaijani regions attached to it? What
is the main reason of the delay of this visit?

Answer: This visit is on focus and on agenda, but the aspects of its
realization are still to be solved. The Secretary General wishes to
pay the visit to the region shortly. The cultural heritage implies
culture and people. Should all the necessary conditions are fulfilled,
the CE secretariat will be prepared to create conditions for group
of experts to work.

Question: The Georgia-Ossetia conflict was the major topic of
discussion at the latest session of PACE. What is your explanation of
the war in Georgia? Did the CE make enough efforts to prevent the war?

Answer: From this point of view, the CE did not stay aside. As a whole,
the international community did not make sufficient efforts to prevent
the war. If CE’s two member-countries are at war between themselves,
this is the failure of the international community. Both countries
are members of the Council of Europe, and therefore, this problem
is of our direct concern. It is possible to say that in reality the
CE is not an organization regulating crises. This is not the primary
task of the organization.

The Council of Europe is an organization, which recommends the
establishment of environment and context that provide possibilities
to prevent conflicts. This is its task. Surely, we could not render
sufficient assistance in this regard. We could not to necessarily
assess the increase in the risk of danger and tension in the
region. Therefore, the Council of Europe must make conclusions to
solve other conflict situations existing in this geographical region.

Question: May the recognition of the independence of Kosovo become
a precedent for other "lingering" conflicts now after declaration of
independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia?

Answer: Some people say that Kosovo is a unique question and
takes the character of "sui generis". This question cannot be
precedent for other lingering conflicts. There are two kinds of
thinking. It is important for each situation to have its sources
and peculiarities. The CE is not an organization, which recognizes
or does not recognize independence. Recognizing is the work, which
is done by the member-countries. Whenever a decision on entrance of
newly established countries to the international arena is made, then
the Committee of Ministers will undertake a burden of decision making.

Question: The war in Georgia has demonstrated how it is dangerous to
unfreeze the frozen conflicts. What about establishment of a standing
unit at CE so that to get more acquainted with other ongoing conflicts?

Answer: I cannot say that there is a need to establish an organization,
which will deal with it. It is clear that tremendous efforts must
be made to establish mutual understanding, democratic and peaceful
dialogue, including good neighbourhood relations. The Directorate,
which I head, must render considerable assistance to this process. We
could not do this sufficiently. It is not so easy to change mentality
and culture. We can not change this within a short period. This is the
work of generations. Why cannot the reconciliation, which was reached
between France and Germany after three wars, be realized in other
places? In this respect it is necessary to have such personalities
as Adenauer and Charles de Goll.

Question: What arrangements does the CE, particularly the CE
Directorate, take to find ways out of the situation in Georgia?

Answer: Proposals regarding Georgia are being developed by the
Committee of Ministers and they cover three directions. Firstly, the
urgent task is the repatriation of refugees and IDPs. The second is
restoration of human rights. Work of CE Commissar for Human Rights
Tomas Hammerberg is of great significance in this sphere and needs
unconditional support in all zones to restore fundamental principles
of democracy and human rights. The third is the EU’s conduct of
training about Human Rights. These are pressing questions. Purely
political issues and those related to the control over fulfilment
of obligations are under discussion. In fact, this crisis arose the
question of fulfilment of obligations undertaken by both member states
as well as peaceful settlement of the conflict and non-intervention
into each-others affairs.

It is also planned to take long-term actions, including establishment
of confidence and dialogue between the sides. In addition, restoration
of cultural heritage damaged during the war will enable people replaced
from the homelands, to return to their native lands. The mission of
the CE Secretariat has already completed visit to Georgia where it
proposed to restore cultural heritage.

Question: What is your appraisal to the political and democratic
situation in Armenia in wake of the events of 1 March?

Answer: PACE, Ago Group and Commissar for Human Rights are closely
observing this issue. The deadline is January, as PACE resolution
adopted in June indicates that the organization will re-examine
Armenia’s fulfilment of its commitments on the basis of future progress
in the investigation into March events and case of dead and arrested
during these events.

New Committee of Experts was set up in accordance with the 23 October
decree of the Armenian President as a supplement to Parliamentary
Commission on investigation into March events. There is progress. It
is necessary to wait for January session to see whether Armenia has
complied with PACE recommendations.

Question: What is your appraisal to the enhancement of cooperation
between GUAM and CE after the consultations that took place in
March 2008?

Answer: In fact, it was first high-level consultation between
the two organizations. GUAM is an organization uniting the CE
member-countries. Hence, there are permanent relations between CE
and GUAM member-countries. At present, the organizations do not
plan institutional cooperation. Indeed, GUAM always expresses its
attitude to issues of mutual interest. We have programs covering
GUAM member-countries. We are prepared to cooperate with GUAM and
countries taking part in this process.

Question: What South Caucasus-related projects are expected to be
carried out in future?

Answer: Regional conference of three countries Rule of Law in the South
Caucasus will be held in Tbilisi from 19 to 22 November. Moreover, we
are working over the project on cooperation of political and scientific
schools of South Caucasus, and it is financed by a German fund.

‘Location, location, location’ key in struggle for Caucasus

Agence France Presse
October 26, 2008 Sunday 2:18 AM GMT

‘Location, location, location’ key in struggle for Caucasus

by Michael Mainville
TBILISI, Oct 26 2008

As a piece of global real estate, the South Caucasus region certainly
fits with the old adage that "location, location, location" will have
suitors knocking at your door.

Wedged between Russia, Turkey and Iran in a rugged strip separating
western markets from eastern energy, the nations of the South Caucasus
have hosted a string of VIP visitors in the wake of the Russia-Georgia
war in August.

The leaders of France, Germany, Russia and Turkey, as well as US Vice
President Dick Cheney, have all visited Armenia, Azerbaijan or Georgia
in recent months, stepping up efforts to gain influence in the region.

Analysts say the influx reflects the region’s unique strategic
position.

"The Caucasus has throughout its history been a flashpoint region at
the crossroads of East and West," said Shalva Lazarishvili, an analyst
with the Tbilisi-based Foundation for Democratic Development.

A land of soaring mountain peaks and ancient ruins, the Caucasus has
long been dominated by foreign empires, from the Persians, to the
Ottomans, to the Russians.

When the region’s three countries gained their independence with the
collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States emerged as a
new player on the scene.

Whether it was giving substantial foreign aid to Armenia, backing new
energy projects in Azerbaijan or supporting Georgia’s pro-Western
leader Mikheil Saakashvili, Washington made significant inroads into
the Caucasus in recent years.

The United States has also become involved in the Caucasus on a
security level, funding various programs that include upgrade of
equipment in Azerbaijan and training for military and other security
personnel in Georgia.

But as a new force in the region, US gains are fragile, analysts said,
and the war in Georgia has shown Russia remains a force to be reckoned
with.

"Russia’s presence in the Caucasus has a 200-year-old history, it has
unique knowledge of how to act there," said Sergei Mikheyev, an
analyst with the Moscow-based Centre for Political Technologies.

"Cultural and historical context is very important, and the North
Caucasus belongs to Russia. All this makes Russia a very strong
player," he said.

Russia sent troops into Georgia on August 8 to repel a Georgian
military attempt to retake the Moscow-backed rebel region of South
Ossetia. Russian troops occupied swathes of the country, but later
withdrew to within South Ossetia and another rebel region, Abkhazia.

To widespread international condemnation, after the conflict Russia
recognised South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states.

Analysts said the conflict has left Russia in a strong position. With
plans to deploy about 7,600 troops in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, it
has gained a key military position south of the Caucasus
mountains. But more importantly, Moscow has made clear it is willing
to take drastic, and potentially risky steps to maintain its influence
in the region.

"The August events demonstrated to Georgia and its neighbours that the
Caucasus remains a priority for Russia," Lazarishvili said.

But experts say the "Great Game" for influence in the region is far
from over.

Despite opposition rumbling, Saakashvili’s hold on power in Georgia
appears secure for now and his government continues to win Western
support, including a pledge of 4.55 billion dollars (3.5 billion
euros) in Western aid on Wednesday.

In energy-rich Azerbaijan, President Ilham Aliyev is expected to
continue walking a fine line between Russia and the West after
securing a second term on October 15. Azerbaijan has benefited hugely
from a Western-backed corridor of pipelines delivering oil and gas
from the Caspian Sea to European markets, but has been careful to also
continue energy cooperation with Russia.

Armenia remains Moscow’s strongest ally in the region and is home to a
key Russian military base, but the country is also one of the largest
recipients of US foreign aid, thanks to the large Armenian diaspora
living in the United States.

Analysts say that with its proximity to a resurgent Russia,
NATO-member Turkey and volatile Iran, the region is in too crucial a
location to ignore.

"The strategic importance of the South Caucasus is growing," said
Svante Cornell, deputy director of the Central Asia Caucasus Institute
and Silk Road Studies Programme in Stockholm.

"It’s about opening up after 200 years of Russian dominance. It’s
about transit of Caspian Sea energy resources to the West. It’s about
transcontinental commerce."