Karbakh Conflict Not Negotiated?

KARBAKH CONFLICT NOT NEGOTIATED?

A1+
12-07-2005

We had a conversation on the Karabakh conflict settlement with chairman
of the NA for foreign affairs Armen Rustamyan.

-How do you assess the package that was recently issued by the
Co-Chairs, according to which Armenia will return 5 Azeri regions
under the condition of conduction a referendum in 10-15 years?

-First, I think it’s premature to give any precise assessment, since
the matter concerns the whole package while a summed up estimation
can be given only in case of awareness of all its constituents.
Certainly, it’s good if we find a compromise, since the principal
task now is to find the correct format of concessions. During the
recent hearings we highlighted several important points. First,
the status of Nagorno Karabakh should be determined on the basis of
the right of self-determination, the security guarantees should be
absolute. It means that with receiving the status Karabakh should
receive security at international level.

-What do you think about conduction of a referendum?

-Positively. Taking into account that one referendum has been
already held I do not think that conduction of another referendum
would conflict with our position. The second referendum will mean
recognition of the right of self-determination.

-Is Armenia empowered to take any decisions in the negotiation
process if it has not recognized Karabakh’s independence de jure yet?
-Certainly, Armenia does not have ultimate right to make decisions.
Armenia can represent Karabakh in the structure, where NKR was not
represented due to its being unrecognized. It is natural and logical.
Armenia can act for Karabakh if the matter concerns the latter’s
joining Armenia. In this case Karabakh’s participation is not
necessary. If Azerbaijan agrees on Karabakh’s joining Armenia the
issue can be settled in two ways – declaration of independence or
unification. The Key West negotiations were held with this logic.
Later the conflict was stated as one between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
It lasted for rather along time and now we face the task to change
the erroneous opinion on the international community.

-Don’t you think that the incumbent authorities provoked this erroneous
opinion by separating Karabakh from the negotiation process?

-First, Karabakh was not separated, second, the process can hardly
be stated as negotiations. The current developments can be called
consultations, while negotiations imply participation of all the
parties to conflict. First of all the conflicting parties should
recognize each other as such. If now Azerbaijan does not recognize
Karabakh the process will be doomed to failure. It will mean that
Azerbaijan refuses from talks.

-The armistice was concluded with the participation of Karabakh,
wasn’t it?

– Yes, due to this very reason we say that the logic should be
preserved. No negotiation process is possible without the participation
of Karabakh.

-What but negotiations can be called the meetings in Key West and
other Kocharyan-Aliyev meetings?

-Those were consultations at a high level with the purpose to find a
solution for the Karabakh conflict. Negotiations can lead to peaceful
agreement and they will start when the parties sit at the bargaining
table.

Soccer: UEFA European U-19 C’ship: Skullerund savours Norway success

UEFA European U-19 C’ship: Skullerund savours Norway success

UEFA

July 20 2005

/noticias.info/ Norway hold the upper hand in UEFA European Under-19
Championship Group B following the first round of matches on Monday,
having defeated Armenia in Lurgan. Goals midway through each half
from Karim Aoudia and Vidar Nisja rewarded an impressive Norwegian
display against the first-time qualifiers. At The Oval in Belfast,
meanwhile, England took the lead against France thanks to Matthew
Fryatt’s early strike, only for Abdoulaye Balde to restore parity.
uefa.com rounds up the coaches’ reaction.

NORWAY 2-0 ARMENIA
Tor Ole Skullerund, Norway
In the end I think we thoroughly deserved the win. We didn’t start
well but got better and better and in the end we should have had more
goals. The Armenians had a lot of possession and passed the ball well
and we expected that because we studied them on video. They are a
good passing side but I think they were lacking a little in the last
third of the pitch. We were very aware of [Edgar] Manucharyan and
[Zhora] Hovhannisyan having seen them both before. They are very good
and skilful players, and Manucharyan had a chance early in the game;
fortunately for us, he didn’t put that away. We set our focus on
breaking quickly once we had won possession, because we knew they are
very skilful on the ball. In the end we should maybe have won by more
because we had one or two good chances at the end but we are happy to
win 2-0.

FRANCE 1-1 ENGLAND
Philippe Bergeroo, France
We’ve never won against England at U19 level, despite the fact we’ve
played them several times in friendly matches, so 1-1 is a good
result. We were worried because of our three suspended players
[Vassiriki Diaby, Yohan Cabaye and Franck Dja Djedje]. It was
therefore important not to lose. England played well collectively,
but we had several chances to score a second goal which we didn’t
manage to do. The wind had an impact for both teams, but the pitch
was excellent.

Martin Hunter, England
That was a typically nervy first game where nobody wanted to lose.
One-all is not an ideal scoreline, but we are satisfied. We know a
lot about the French team, they have some good players and some were
in the stands today. The pitch was okay, although it became very
windy which made life difficult. Today we were short of fitness but
we are confident for the next match.

http://es.uefa.com/index.html

BAKU: Armenia violates ceasefire in Terter, report says

Armenia violates ceasefire in Terter, report says

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
July 19 2005

Baku, July 18, AssA-Irada — Armenian military units, from their
positions in the occupied Talish village of Terter District, fired at
Chayli village of the same district and the positions of Azerbaijani
troops in the village with machine guns and submachine guns from 23.00
on Sunday till 01.00 on Monday, local TVs have reported. No casualties
are reported. The Ministry of Defense did not confirm the reports.*

Armenian studies and preservation of national values

Armenian studies and preservation of national values

Editorial

Yerkir
July 15, 2005

The task of the Armenian studies is to not only study its field and
“explain” to the society who they are, but also scientifically ensures
that the objects of its study and values are preserved and developed.

This is the field where absence of a scientific “prescription” could
be devastating. Today, a situation has emerged that if we fail to
formulate a living link between the sciences studying the culture and
the policies of those fields, we may soon lose the our national values.

Without the knowledge stemming from specific fields of the Armenian
studies it is hard to imagine how the values defining the Armenian
identity could be passed on and refreshed.

But without the implementation of the scientific and educational
functions of the Armenian studies, it is unimaginable how the national
values could be preserved and developed. This means that the Armenian
studies should offer the results of its findings to not only museums
and similar establishments but also educational establishments and
governmental bodies.

In this respect, the present indefinite — or even chaotic — situation
should be overcome by elaborating mechanisms of cooperation between
governmental bodies and scientific establishments as well as formulate
a proper cultural policy.

Presently, along with preservation and enhancement of cultural
heritage forming the basis of the national values, the roles of the
specific fields of the Armenian studies acquire new significance in
preserving the existing values, boosting them and passing them on,
meanwhile keeping them away from foreign influences.

In order to succeed, the modern Armenian state should work hand in
hand with the triangle science-education-culture.

Women Build with Habitat for Humanity Armenia

For immediate release
July 18, 2005

Contact at HFH Armenia:
Haykuhi Khachatryan
Aygestan 8-th str, h 5,
Yerevan-025, Armenia
Tel: (374 10) 556-114
e-mail: [email protected]

Women Build Event is becoming an annual tradition for HFH Armenia.

This year on July 6 -12 a group of women from different part of
Europe joined to Habitat for Humanity Armenia in Vayots Dzor region,
in the village of Aghavnadzor in the context within the “Women Build”
program. Habitat for Humanity Armenia started its activities in this
village this summer and five families from this village were selected
to be HFH Armenia’s beneficiaries.

Emma Pearson from UK, Jeanne Nicolay and Rozen Clech from France,
Laura Ferent from Romania passed hundreds of miles to help those in
need to build simple, decent homes in Armenia.

For the families especially for mothers, who spent most part of their
life in shacks, it is very important to receive this support and care
and build secure homes and lives for their children.

On July 13 to join the “Women Build” events came together several high
ranking women from Vayots Dzor region including regional governor’s
wife, local non profit organizations’ presidents and also HFH Armenia
local women volunteers.

These days were full of experience for all the women who took part
in these building events.

The Women group from Europe and Armenian women shared their perspective
of life and their way of living in different parts of world which
was part of cultural program for Women Build.

Women Built event is a great opportunity to gather female together
for understanding the needs and finding ways to light-heartening
mothers lives. Construction is not only men’s job but also women can
do it as well and help communities. The team worked hard laying the
isolation level and the concrete for the floors of Hovhannisian’s
house. The presence of this women team inspired the whole community
to take part in the building activities: all selected families from
Aghavanadzor, neighbors, local youth group from school, local governor
and PC volunteers.

Such events are aimed to encourage the involvement of women in the
construction of Habitat homes once more. Women Build challenges and
empowers women to build safe, healthy housing where children can
flourish and grow to be all that they can be. We hope this tradition
is going to be enduring in Habitat for Humanity Armenia’s program by
the Women Build project.

“It will remain alive in my heart for a very long time and I hope to
repeat it very soon! “- said Rozenn Clech, “Women Build” team member.

HFH Armenia appreciates all the women who crossed so many miles to be
next to our families to encourage them believe in life again and also
who helped to realize “Women Build” event in Armenia this year too.

To schedule an interview please email Haykuhi Khachatryan,
Communication Coordinator for Habitat for Humanity Armenia
[email protected]. See for more information.

Founded in 1976, Habitat for Humanity International is a
non-denominational Christian, non-governmental, non-profit housing
organization that has helped more than 1000,000 people of all races,
religions and backgrounds to have a simple, decent and affordable place
to live. Habitat for Humanity becomes a global leader in addressing
poverty housing. Habitat for Humanity is active in 100 countries
worldwide, including 19 in Europe and Central Asia.

THE END

www.hfharmenia.org

Movie festival in Armenia

Movie festival in Armenia

RIA Novosti, Russia
July 17 2005

YEREVAN, July 17 (RIA Novosti, Gamlet Matevosyan) – The second
international movie festival Golden Apricot-2005 is closing in
Armenia’s capital Yerevan Sunday.

The festival under the motto On the Crossroads of Civilizations and
Cultures included contests for feature films and documentaries shot
in 2004-2005.

Fifteen full-length movies from 13 countries, including France,
Russia, Britain, China, Argentina, the Netherlands and Latvia were
presented. Well-known film directors and critics, including Claude
Miller from France and Deborah Young from the U.S. were on the jury
headed by Atom Egoyan, Canadian director of Armenian extraction.

Armenian movies were presented in a special contest program Armenian
panorama, with 29 feature, documentary and animation cinematographers
participating.

Overall, 140 films form 45 countries were presented at the festival.
Master classed, jazz concerts and art expositions were held at the
festival.

The Armenian government allocated some $56,800 for the festival. The
first such event took place last year in Yerevan on June 30-July 4.
Fifty-five movies from 16 countries were shown then.

Armenia not under transport blockade, Baku states

ARMENIA NOT UNDER TRANSPORT BLOCKADE, BAKU STATES

15.07.2005 03:26

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “Armenia is not under transport blockade”,
Azerbaijani Deputy Minister of Transport Musa Pakhanov stated, Trend
news agency reports. “If Armenia were under blockade it would not
be able to receive the cargo. Presently Armenia receives the cargo
destined for it via Georgia and Iran. That is why the claims of the
alleged transport blockade of Armenia are not true”, he noted. When
touching upon the new railway route Sukhumi-Tbilisi-Yerevan, M.
Pakhanov said that it’s merely an idea at the moment. “Over the
availability of a number of political problems the project is not
promising, moreover in the soviet period the route for conveyance of
passengers only”, he resumed.

Minsk Group Working Out ‘Basis of Settlement’ Of The Conflict

AZG Armenian Daily #128, 13/07/2005

Karabakh issue

MINSK GROUP WORKING OUT ‘BASIS OF SETTLEMENT’ OF THE CONFLICT

Co-Chairs Will Discuss ‘Wording Alternatives’

Co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk group arrived in the region on
Sunday. This is the first visit of the mediators since the
parliamentary elections in Nagorno Karabakh on June 19 that were
estimated as democratic by international and local observers.

On July 11, Yuri Merzlyakov (Russia), Steven Mann (USA) and Bernard
Fassie (France) met with the Azerbaijani foreign minister Elmar
Mamediarov. The so-called head of Karabakh’s Azeri community, Nizami
Bahmanov, brought up some details after the meeting. According to
Armenpress, the talks focused on opening a transport route from
Azerbaijan to Armenia through Karabakh’s territory as well as
returning the refugees to their permanent domiciles.

Bahmanov said that “the key issue is returning Azeris to their
settlements” and “the status of the region cannot be settled without
returning them to Nagorno Karabakh”. “There is advance in the talks,
and we are hopeful that the public will be informed on August 26 after
the meeting of Azeri and Armenian president in Kazan”, Bahmanov said.

Mediamax informs that the co-chairs and Mamediarov discussed “the
present stage of Karabakh settlement process and the situation created
after the Warsaw meeting between Armenian and Azeri presidents and the
Paris meeting of foreign ministers”. After the meeting with President
Aliyev, Minsk group co-chairs will set off for Yerevan to meet
Armenian authorities. Settlement talks will continue further in
Stepanakert, Nagorno Karabakh.

Lately, authorities in Baku have been often speaking of exploiting
common transport corridors. The former Russian co-chair to the Minsk
group, Vladimir Kazimirov, told Vremya Novostey paper on this occasion
that official Baku’s offer is “directed to the electorate and the
outer world”.

“Azerbaijan is getting ready for parliamentary elections, and
pre-election calculations influence Baku’s talks strategy”, Kazimirov
said. He thinks that “Armenians, who are not squeezed by the election
factor yet, have positive but reserved evaluation of the talks
process”.

Kazimirov noted that despite belligerent statements and harshness over
key issues, Azerbaijan has also begun speaking of trust-inspiring
arrangements, of which it did not want to hear formerly. The former
co-chair pointed out to Baku’s proposal to maintain common control
over Aghdam-Nakhijevan road (via Nagorno Karabakh, Lachin and
Armenia).

“The issue of communication in the conflict zone is important, but
that is no key for the settlement”, Kazimirov said, adding “the status
of Nagorno Karabakh and liberation of regions Armenia occupied 11-12
years ago are still in the epicenter of discords”.

A day before the visit, Yuri Merzlyakov stated that the mediators will
continue working out the ” basis of regulation” of the confrontation
with the sides. “We are in high and working mood. I think that this
visit will be beneficial for further talks process”, Merzlyakov said.

The visit of Minsk group co -chairs to the South Caucasus will last
till July 16. On August 26, Armenian president will meet his Azeri
counterpart in Kazan on the sidelines of CIS non-official
meeting. Before that, it is expected that Armenian and Azeri foreign
ministers will have 1 or 2 meetings.

By Tatoul Hakobian

Armenia sends second batch of peacekeepers to Iraq for rotation

Armenia sends second batch of peacekeepers to Iraq for rotation

Arminfo
11 Jul 05

YEREVAN

Armenia does not pursue any military goals by sending peacekeepers to
Iraq, this is an exceptionally humanitarian mission, Chief of the
General Staff Col-Gen Mikael Arutyunyan has said at a ceremony to
dispatch the second group of peacekeepers to Iraq for six months.

The chief of the General Staff noted that participation in the
post-war restoration of Iraq is not the only peacekeeping mission in
which Armenia is taking part. Armenian peacekeepers are serving in
Kosovo, and they have been rotated twice already.

Talking to journalists after the ceremony, Arutyunyan said that at the
beginning the peacekeepers will be trained in Kuwait and will then be
redeployed to Iraq where they will fulfil their task under the Polish
command. They will stay there with the first group for several days,
after which the first group will return to Armenia. He noted that the
Polish command is very pleased with the Armenian peacekeepers who are
rated highly.

“I met the chief of the General Staff and the first deputy defence
minister of Poland in Brussels and they are very pleased with our
group. They noted the discipline and professionalism of the Armenian
servicemen,” Mikael Arutyunyan stressed.

Asked whether a third group of peacekeepers might be sent to Iraq, the
chief of the General Staff noted that the Armenian army was ready for
this. At the same time he noted that the Armenian parliament has
adopted a decision on sending Armenian peacekeepers to Iraq for a
year. “At the end of the year the parliament will return to this
issue. Only after this will it be possible to say whether the third
group will be sent,” the colonel-general noted.

The first batch of Armenian peacekeepers left for Iraq on 18
January. The second group will return on 20 December. The Armenian
servicemen are engaged exclusively in humanitarian activities in Iraq,
including medical aid, mine clearing and delivery of humanitarian aid.

The Armenian peacekeepers include 46 servicemen, including 30 drivers,
three doctors, 10 sappers, a liaison officer, a platoon commander and
an officer who will be in charge of overall command.

Cigar Symphony

The American Spectator
July 2005 – August 2005

Cigar Symphony

by Jed Babbin

WINSTON CHURCHILL SAID, iSmoking cigars is like falling in love;
first you are attracted to its shape; you stay for its flavor; and
you must always remember never, never let the flame go out.i Mark
Twain, Ulysses S. Grant, and Churchill are perhaps historyis three
most famous cigar smokers. Twain said heid decline an invitation to
Heaven if he couldnit smoke cigars there, but never shared his method
of judging cigars. His admonition that ia woman is just a woman, but
a good cigar is a smokei is of no use to modern man. Weill probably
never know, but quantity probably weighed more heavily than quality
to Grantis taste. Only Churchill left us instruction on how to choose
a cigar. He said, iOf two cigars pick the longest and the strongest.i

Everyone who deeply enjoys a good cigar knows why Churchillis analogy
to love is perfect and why his rule of choice is perfectly wrong.
Choosing a cigar is an intensely personal matter. My father followed
Churchillis rule. He smoked the strongest cigars imaginable, but when
old enough to try one I quickly learned that some cigars are too
heavy, bitter, or even intoxicating. My taste varies with the time of
day, what Iim doing, and even my mood. The best cigar for an
afternoon aboard the tractor mowing grass isnit usually the right one
to accompany a brandy after dinner. During Bill Clintonis tenure, a
larger, stronger cigar, or two or three, were necessary companions
while writing a column about the villainy of the week. Yet another
type of cigar is appropriate for a shooting event or a long drive.

Because there are so many variations of taste, the cigar makeris task
is a complex one. Mass-produced cigars are one thing. Itis enough for
them that they have a consistent — usually awful — taste, uniform
size and weight, and above all are produced cheaply by the tens of
thousands without a humanis touch. The premium cigars, those aimed at
the discriminating consumer and the true connoisseur, are a much more
complex task.

Making a great cigar, I guessed, was probably like making a great
wine. What kind of tobacco seed is used, the soil in which it is
grown, how it is aged, and the skill of the cigar roller — the
person who actually forms the leaves into the cigar — must, I
assumed, be essential to the cigar makeris art. As far as that goes,
itis right. But thereis much more. As I have learned from two grand
masters of the cigar-making art, creating a great cigar is less like
making a fine wine than composing a beautiful symphony.

ABOUT TEN YEARS AGO I came across a cigar brand that was new to me.
It was a Dominican cigar and the label said iPaul Garmirian.i I
bought a few and, about a week later, a few more. Soon, I was smoking
little else, other than another cryptically labeled cigar, the iAvo
Uvezian.i The PGs had an oaky, nutlike flavor. Full-flavored but not
overbearing, they seemed to meet almost every need. The Avo, a bit
stronger, covered my more restive moods. The PGs and Avos became a
consistent habit, broken only by a few Cuban cigars that, ah, somehow
fell into my hands. Then, at a cigar dinner at the Lansdowne Resort
about six years ago, a gent with a broad smile came up, stuck out his
hand to shake mine, and said, iHi. Iim Paul Garmirian.i We have since
become very good friends. Thanks to Paul, and his kind introduction
to Hendrick Kelner, president of Tabacos Dominicanos (TD), I have
learned a bit about cigars.

Mr. Hendrick Kelner is an engineer by profession. Of Dutch ancestry,
Kelner grew up in the Dominican Republic and has been working in and
studying the manufacture of cigars since he graduated from college.
Dr. Paul Garmirian — like his pal Avo Uvezian — is of Armenian
ancestry. He emigrated to the United States from Lebanon after
studying in London. Garmirian is an academic, and expert in
international relations. Like Kelner, he seemed destined for his
career in cigars, having grown up under a cigar connoisseur for a
father.

Together, Kelner and Garmirian make my favorite cigars. The two are
to cigars what Rachmaninoff and Aaron Copland are to music. They
donit just make cigars, they compose them lovingly, arranging sizes,
shapes, and tastes for different smokers in just the same way a
composer arranges his music for orchestras and bands.

Garmirian takes pride in his cigars, but only a small part of the
credit for their taste Heis told me again and again, iItis 90 percent
Henky and Eladio and 10 percent me.i iHenkyi — Hendrick Kelner — is
one of the leading tobacco growers and makers of premium cigars in
the world. And yes, Virginia, that includes Cuba, whose cigar
industry is declining dramatically. iEladioi — Mr. Eladio Diaz — is
Kelneris chief iblender,i the expert who takes the tobaccos grown,
aged, and fermented under Kelneris exacting standards and blends them
to the desired strength and taste. Kelner is the maker of the
world-famous Davidoff cigars as well as the Avo, Griffin, and PG
Cigars.

Wait a minute, you say. Tobacco is grown and harvested, sure. But
aged? Fermented? Now we are back to wines. Tobacco, according to both
Kelner and Garmirian, is — like grapes — better in some years than
others. And to make a great cigar, it needs to be grown carefully,
harvested at the precise moment of maturation, and cured before it
is, literally, fermented. In Garmirianis The Gourmet Guide to Cigars,
he quotes Kelner as saying, iA complete curing is realized in curing
barns where the starch in the leaves is converted into fructose and
sugar products which ultimately convert into alcohol thus bringing
about the process of fermentation.i The fermentation and aging remove
the tobaccois naturally bitter oils, ammonia, and other chemicals
that would produce the wrong flavors. Before tobacco becomes a PG
cigar, it has been cured, fermented, and aged for four years or more.
When you buy that PG cigar, it will be comprised of tobaccos that can
be up to five years old.

Kelneris growing the tobacco, aging and fermenting it, is engineering
and science. The remaining 10 percent is Paulis art.

PAUL GARMIRIAN IS A RENAISSANCE MAN. He speaks six languages, plays
classical guitar, and has a Ph.D. from Catholic University, where he
used to teach. As Paul told me, his taste — his palate for cigar
flavors — is partly nature (his daughter has it) and partly nurture.
His father was a cigar aficionado. From the time Paul could walk, he
was around people who smoked fine Cuban cigars. He tasted champagne,
caviar, and while a youth found himself fascinated with the
tantalizing smell of cigars in the box. As he explains, about 80
percent of taste is smell. Paulis nose — what little talent it
didnit inherit — was trained by decades of smelling the best cigars
in the world.

As youid expect of an academic, Paul decided to research and write a
book about cigars. When the first edition of his Gourmet Guide to
Cigars came out in 1990, the industry greeted it warmly. He met Avo
Uvezian and, through him, Hendrick Kelner. Events — propelled by the
almost instantaneous friendship between Kelner and Garmirian — led
to the launch of the PG cigar brand later that same year. And thatis
when a theory of music was brought to the world of cigars.

In 1991, Paul was sitting in Kelneris office, talking to him and
Eladio Diaz, the chief blender of cigars at TD. Paul is a guitarist
of 50 years, and thinks in musical terms. He said, iI was sitting in
his office and I was trying to communicate the fact that the
particular blend had a high-pitched tone and I compared it to a
piccolo. I said we needed more bass.i Garmirian wondered how his
explanation was received.

Five years later, Garmirian again visited Kelneris Dominican Republic
office to discuss new cigar blends. In that meeting, Kelner turned to
Eladio Diaz and said the particular blend needed iless alto and more
bass.i Garmirian told me, iI said to Henky, I remember a few years
ago when I said that I felt awkward because, maybe, you thought I was
crazy. He — a little tongue-in-cheek — said no, Paul, we have
adopted your music theory on the blending of cigars. I told him that
I thought that I write the music and they perform it to perfection,
and [Kelner] told me, eNo, you donit write music, you write
symphonies.ii

I asked Mr. Kelner, who makes cigars for every taste, how that theory
is applied at the extremes. How do you satisfy the customer who wants
a Wagnerian cigar? Whatis the difference between that one and the
cigar for someone who wants to smoke a Tchaikovsky?

Kelner said: iWagner and Tchaikovsky are very different and they
would be two completely different cigars. Wagner — because of his
personality, character, and the era that he had to live in Germany,
as well as his deep anarchist conviction of his youth — his music
was influenced as revolutionary and nationalist. It could be
summarized as a strong music that was torture to the criticis ear.
The passionate Wagnerians are in ecstasies with his melodies and then
exhausted, fatigued of their own pleasure. A Wagner cigar would be a
strong cigar, of intense flavor, stimulating, exciting, that the
smoker becomes exhausted and then enjoying later its aftertaste. It
would be cigar for one kind of smoker.i

For other smokers, Hendrick and Paul offer other cigars. For example,
Kelner said, iTchaikovsky [was] a different personality. Influenced
by the death of his mother when he was a boy, a fragile personality
that avoided physical contact with the opposite sex, he idealized the
woman, creating pure, feminine characters in his works (Tatiana,
MarIa, Liza, Juana de Arco). Therefore his music was soothing,
harmonious, and spiritual, which compared to a cigar would be a
smooth and harmonious cigar, with the complexity of a genius but
without attacking the senses. It would be a goodO cigar [with which]
to meditate.i Or, as I can attest, with which to write. DON’T THINK
ABOUT GENERAL GRANT when you go out to buy your next smoke. Grant
said he only knew two songs: one was Yankee Doodle, and the other
wasnit. Think about your music and apply it to your cigar. Is your
favorite CD Borodin or Rossini? Copland, Mancini, or the Rolling
Stones? Do you know what you will be doing when you smoke it? Do you
have an inkling of what your mood might be? If you think in those
terms, and carefully absorb the scent of the unlit cigar, youill make
the right choice. My tastes tend to Ahmad Jamal on the piano, or
Tchaikovsky, or Aaron Copland.

Tomorrow, as I climb on the seat of my big tractor for a three-hour
mowing session, Iill have a big stick in my pocket. The PG
Celebration is the music of America, and big enough to last through
five acres of mowing. Itis summer, and though Loudoun Countyis
rolling, grassy hills arenit the Appalachian Mountains, when I light
up I will taste Coplandis iAppalachian Spring.i Jed Babbin, an
American Spectator contributing editor, is the author of Inside the
Asylum: Why the UN and Old Europe Are Worse Than You Think.