Iran, Armenia sign energy agreement

Iran, Armenia sign energy agreement

United Press International
July 6 2006

TEHRAN, July 6 (UPI) — The Iranian and Armenian governments
Thursday reached seven agreements on energy, economy and industrial
infrastructure.

The memorandums of understanding were signed by officials in
the presences of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his Armenian
counterpart, Robert Kocharian, Iranian news agency IRNA reported.

The two countries agreed to finance an electric power line project.

Armenia is landlocked, located in the Caucasus region, bordering
Georgia, Turkey, Azerbaijan and Iran.

Armenia does not have any oil or gas resources, but has rich mines
of gold, copper, zinc and lead.

Iran, a leading member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries, has vast oil and gas reserves.

President Kocharyan Proposed General Amnesty

PRESIDENT KOCHARYAN PROPOSED GENERAL AMNESTY

Lragir.am
06 July 06

On June 30 President Kocharyan offered the National Assembly a proposal
on granting general amnesty on the occasion of the 15th anniversary
of independence of Armenia. The proposal will be discussed in the
July 6 extraordinary meeting of the National Assembly.

The minister of justice Davit Harutiunyan says if the proposal of
Robert Kocharyan is enacted, 300 convicts will be released. According
to the chair of the State and Legal Committee Rafik Petrosyan, 700
inmates will be released.

Robert Kocharyan proposes amnesty for people who committed a crime
before June 1, 2006 including, and amnesty on the basis of disability
and age is for people, who were recognized disabled before the day
before the adoption of the decision on amnesty, or who became 60
years old before September 30, 2006.

In accordance with this bill, amnesty will be granted to persons
sentenced to three years of imprisonment, and persons put on
probation. Amnestry will be granted to convicts sentenced to five
years of imprisonment, who have disabilities of the 2nd or 3rd
categories and aged 60 and more, convicts who were under 18 at the
moment of committing the crime and do not have previous convictions,
as well as participants of the war. Amnesty will be granted to the
convicts sentenced to ten years of imprisonment, who have served 1/3
of the sentence. Generally, the list of prisoners, whom amnesty will
be granted, is rather long.

BAKU: 4 Years Pass Since Establishment Of State Committee For World

4 YEAR PASS SINCE ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD AZERBAIJANIS LIVING ABROAD

Today, Azerbaijan
July 6 2006

On Wednesday 4 year pass since establishment of State Committee for
World Azerbaijanis Living Abroad (SCWALA).

The associates of the Committee have visited the grave of Heydar
Aliyev for this occasion in Honorary Avenue, APA rports.

Committee Chief Nazim Ibrahimov told in his statement to journalists
that that Diaspora work in Azerbaijan is conducted in state level.

According to him, Armenians started to get worried of the active
activities of Azerbaijani Diaspora.

"Today Armenian emissaries visiting different places of the world
call on making their Diaspora organizations active. Our Diaspora
organizations have already gathered around Azerbaijani state and try
to bring our right voice to the world."

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/society/27881.html

World-Famous Film Director Tonino Guerra To Arrive In Armenia In Day

WORLD-FAMOUS FILM DIRECTOR TONINO GUERRA TO ARRIVE IN ARMENIA IN DAYS OF GOLDEN APRICOT INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Jul 5 2006

YEREVAN, JULY 5, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. World-famous film
director Tonino Guerra has also give consent to be present at the
Golden Apricot (Voske Tsiran) third international film festival. He
will be already the 5th greatest figure to be present at the festival
this year. In the 70-s Tonino Guerra had close contacts with Sergei
Parajanov and has always wished to see the talented cinematographer’s
homeland. Tonino Guerra will be given a prize after Parajanov on
hehalf of the Golden Apricot film festival for his great contribution
to the world cinema.

Informing about it at the July 5 press conference, festival Art
Director Susanna Haroutiunian said that the prominent guest will join
the festival some days late, on July 13, and will stay in Yerevan
until the festival ends.

Susanna Haroutiunian also informed that on the day of festival’s
opening, July 10, besides the film "Namous," the 15-minute documentary
film "Andrei" by Arsen Azatian and Narine Mkrtchian shot in the 60-s,
dedicated to Andrei Tarkovski, will be also shown. The film contains
episodes regarding the period of the cinematographer’s life when he
was in Armenia.

Armenian Prime Minister To Visit France In October

ARMENIAN PRIME MINISTER TO VISIT FRANCE IN OCTOBER

PanARMENIAN.Net
05.07.2006 18:28 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan will pay
a visit to France October 17-18. He will take part in the conference of
twin cities of Armenia and France to be held under the patronage of the
heads of the French Senate and the Armenian parliament, reported the RA
government’s press service. "I think this event will mark the opening
of the Year of Armenia in France," Margaryan said. He assured Yerevan
will do the utmost to make the Year of Armenia in France a bright
event for the development of the friendly Armenian-French relations.

Karabakh War Vets Reject Armenian Land Concessions

KARABAKH WAR VETS REJECT ARMENIAN LAND CONCESSIONS
By Ruzanna Stepanian and Anna Saghabalian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
July 4 2006

A group of prominent Armenian veterans of the war in Nagorno-Karabakh
on Tuesday warned Armenia’s leadership against returning any territory
to Azerbaijan, saying that would be tantamount to high treason.

In a statement which they claimed was signed by some two thousand
rank-and-file veterans, the former field commanders warned that the
authorities in Yerevan will earn the "status of Turkish occupiers
with all consequences stemming from that" if they agree to liberate
any of the seven Azerbaijani districts surrounding Karabakh. "At this
critical moment we are urging all patriotic forces to unite and defend
our endangered homeland," they said.

None of the known signatories of the statement is affiliated with the
Yerkrapah Union, the biggest and most influential of groups uniting
Karabakh war veterans. The Yerkrapah leadership, which is loyal to
the Armenian government, has not commented on the latest Karabakh
peace initiatives so far.

The angry statement was apparently prompted by the publication of the
main principles of the most recent international plan to resolve the
Karabakh conflict, which envisages Armenian withdrawal from at least
six of the occupied districts. The Lachin district, which serves as the
shortest overland link between Karabakh and Armenia, would remain under
Armenian control at least until a future referendum on the disputed
enclave’s status. Official Yerevan has largely accepted this plan.

"This is not mutual compromise, this is a surrender," said Manvel
Yeghiazarian, the former commander of the now disbanded Arabo militia
that fought in the Karabakh war. He warned that President Robert
Kocharian will be considered a "traitor" and incur his and many other
veterans’ ire if he signs such a deal.

"Twenty one fighters of Arabo went missing on June 29, 1992 [and
remain unaccounted for]. What should I say to their mothers?"

Yeghiazarian told reporters.

"Nobody must dare surrender those territories, whether he is a
president or a minister," said Levon Sahakian of the Independence Army,
another former paramilitary group. "Our brothers died there and those
lands are very important for us."

Ashot Bleyan, a former education minister and the most famous proponent
of far-reaching Armenian concessions to Azerbaijan, scoffed at such
arguments, challenging Armenian hardliners to settle in the largely
deserted Azerbaijani lands with their families. Bleyan, had served in
the administration of former President Levon Ter-Petrosian, rejected
their claims that the Armenians already resolved the Karabakh dispute
on the battlefield and must not concede anything.

"Before saying that we won, every Armenian must ask themselves:
What are they ready for? Are they ready to die? Are they ready to
send their boy to death?" he told a roundtable discussion in Yerevan.

Bleyan raised eyebrows in Armenia and Karabakh when he visited
Baku on a peace-making mission in late 1992, at the height of the
Armenian-Azerbaijani war. He declared on Tuesday that he is ready
to make another trip to Azerbaijan, describing it as a "potential
strategic partner" of Armenia. "If we don’t want to respect a
neighboring state and have relations with it, we can’t be serious,"
he said.

Yerevan’s apparent acceptance of the peace plan put forward by the
OSCE Minsk Group contrasts with serious reservations expressed by the
ethnic Armenian leadership of Karabakh. Samvel Babayan, the former
wartime commander of the Karabakh Armenian army, echoed Stepanakert’s
concerns in an interview with RFE/RL last week, saying that the plan
is too risky for the Armenian side because it calls for the return
of Azerbaijani refugees to Karabakh and Lachin.

"One small incidents, and all roads leading to Stepanakert would
again be blocked and we would return to 1988," said Babayan.

RA MFA Doesn’t Prepare For New Round Of Armenian-Turkish Talks

RA MFA DOESN’T PREPARE FOR NEW ROUND OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH TALKS

PanARMENIAN.Net
03.07.2006 19:01 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not
preparing for a new round of the Armenian-Turkish talks, Acting
Spokesman of the RA MFA Vladimir Karapetian told a PanARMENIAN.Net
reporter.

"As for the statement by Turkish MFA Spokesman Namik Tan on the
proposal to form a commission of historians on the investigation of
the fact of the Armenian Genocide, I would like to remind that in
response Armenian President Robert Kocharian proposed to study the
ways for normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations at the level
of an intergovernmental commission," Vladimir Karapetian said.

Azeri Delegation Activities in PACE – Cheap Political Gambling

PanARMENIAN.Net

Azeri Delegation Activities in PACE – Cheap Political Gambling

30.06.2006 17:36 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Discussions titled `Forest fires. Ecological
consequences and influence of policy of territorial planning’ were
held in Strasbourg today, reported the RA NA press office. From the
very beginning the Azeri delegation accused Nagorno Karabakh of
setting up arsons. In this view Armenian parliament speaker Tigran
Torosian delivered a speech. He said in part, `This is really a very
serious problem and I would not take the floor if our Azeri
counterpart hadn’t call on you to urge my assistance as the chairman
of the Armenian National Assembly. I appreciate the confidence of the
Azeri counterparts and want to response to these statements.

For a week already the Azeri delegation keeps on stating that
Armenians set fire to the forests along the border of Nagorno
Karabakh. The mildest assessment I can give to this show is cheap
political gambling. I will explain why. Three years ago Nagorno
Karabakh authorities being concerned over the fires at the near-border
pastures proposed Azerbaijan to work out joint mechanisms for
prevention of fires. Azerbaijan did not response to the proposal. The
difference of the positions of NKR and Azerbaijan on the matter is
obvious. While Baku was setting up clamor NKR Foreign Ministry June 15
requested the Office of the OSCE CiO’s Personal Representative to hold
a monitoring to assess the real situation and refute false accusations
advanced by Azerbaijan. The OSCE mission has been examining the
near-border territories for several days but found nothing what could
prove Azerbaijan’s statements. Unfortunately, spreading hatred and
invented accusations – these are the methods Azerbaijan uses when
discussing any matter. For this purpose they are even ready to falsify
the CoE documents. This is nothing but disrespect for the PACE and the
CoE principles.’

ANKARA: Patriarch Mesrob II: I Do Not Agree With Karekin II’s Commen

PATRIARCH MESROB II: I DO NOT AGREE WITH KAREKIN II’S COMMENTS ON GENOCIDE

Hurriyet, Turkey
June 28 2006

Patriach Mesrob II, the leader of the Armenian Orthodox community
in Turkey, has commented on his differing views from those expressed
last week by Catholicos Karekin II, the world leader of the Armenian
Orthodox Church, who was in Istanbul last week for a visit.

Karekin, who came to Istanbul as the guest of Greek Fener Patriarch
Bartholomeus and as well as of Patriarch Mesrob II, held a press
conference at the Armenian Patriarchate on Sunday during which he
called on Turkey to officially recognize the events of 1915 as a
genocide against the Armenians. Mesrob II had subsequently commented
to the press that his perspective on the matter differs from that
of Karekin II’s, and that the Turkish-Armenian relationship is not
soley based on incidents which took place between 1890-1923.

Responding to reporters’ questions about what he thought of Karekin
II’s statements about genocide, Mesrob II said: "How can I comment
on those statements? I guess I could say ‘They were as I expected
they would be.’ At the press conference at which Katekin II spoke,
TV cameras from the Armenian station Shoagat were present. All of
the diaspora watches Shoagat TV. So Karekin knew the public he was
addressing with his comments. I think differently on the matter, as
I have said many times in the past. The disaster of 1915 should be
examined on separate platforms by politcians, historians, diplomats,
and sociologists. This would be very helpful in terms of creating
empathy and understanding, rather than enmity."

CSTO Summit: Military Bloc Not Yet Cemented

CSTO SUMMIT: MILITARY BLOC NOT YET CEMENTED
By Vladimir Socor

Eurasia Daily Monitor, DC
June 28 2006

Presidents Vladimir Putin of Russia, Alexander Lukashenka of Belarus,
Robert Kocharian of Armenia, Nursultan Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan,
Kurmanbek Bakiyev of Kyrgyzstan, Imomali Rahmonov of Tajikistan,
and Islam Karimov of Uzbekistan met on June 23 in Minsk for a dual
summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the
Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEc). The two groups’ membership
rosters are identical except in the case of Armenia, a member of the
CSTO but not of EurAsEc.

Speaking to journalists during a break between the two meetings,
Putin asserted, "Developing closer cooperation between EurAsEc and
the CSTO is one of the most topical tasks, which will make it possible
to protect integration processes from various threats" (NTV Mir, June
23). "Integration processes" being the classic code word for Russian
policies, Putin’s statement confers a distinctly military dimension to
such processes. Combining the CSTO and EurAsEc summits into a single
event in Minsk underscored that idea. Trading chairs at this summit,
Putin handed over the CSTO’s rotating chairmanship to Lukashenka
while the latter turned the EurAsEc chairmanship over to Putin.

The CSTO summit decided to place the Collective Rapid Deployment
Force under the command of a single headquarters that would operate
on a permanent basis. Until now, a standing operational group
based in Bishkek has been in charge of that Force under Russia’s
Major-General Sergei Chernomordin, who is also deputy chief of staff of
the Volga-Urals Military District. The 4,000-strong Rapid Deployment
Force, earmarked for possible operations in Central Asia, presently
consists — at least on paper — of 10 battalions of varying readiness
levels, including: three battalions from Russia, three from Tajikistan
(two of these apparently from the Russian division stationed in that
country and one from Tajikistan itself), two from Kazakhstan, and two
from Kyrgyzstan (the latter country has pleaded poverty asking to be
excused from contributing a second battalion). These units are based
in the respective countries under national control and hold joint
exercises, usually at annual intervals, under joint command. Russia’s
air base at Kant in Kyrgyzstan, with some 10 tactical combat aircraft
and about a dozen helicopters, is designated a CSTO base and assigned
to the Collective Rapid Deployment Force.

According to some Russian media reports, participants in the Minsk
summit approved a decision whereby any CSTO member country wishing to
accept a deployment of non-CSTO troops on its territory must first
obtain the agreement of all the other CSTO countries (RTR Russia
Television, June 23). If so, this implies that military exercises
involving U.S. or NATO countries’ troops, their transit passage,
or their use of military installations in any CSTO member country,
for example on anti-terrorism missions, would necessitate Russian
approval. Thus, Washington or NATO allies would have to negotiate
the approval not just with possible host countries, but with Moscow,
which could either withhold the approval, maneuver one or several
CSTO countries into withholding it, or try to trade its approval for
some geopolitical quid-pro-quo elsewhere.

Thus, if this summit decision is final, Moscow would insert itself
between the Western alliance system and CSTO member countries,
trying to force the latter to deal with the West through Russia,
not directly. In Central Asia, such a situation would reverse the
Pentagon’s historic diplomatic achievements of 2001-2002, when it
negotiated basing agreements directly with Central Asian presidents,
who felt encouraged to resist Moscow’s pressures at that time.

The decision in Minsk may also aim to nudge NATO into
alliance-to-alliance contacts and common activities with the CSTO,
thus granting the latter a form of political recognition. However,
CSTO member countries are generally interested in cooperating with
NATO in a national capacity, and NATO has always related to them
directly, consistently avoiding the pitfall of dealing with the
CSTO collectively.

At present, NATO prepares to expand its operations in Afghanistan and
may request logistical support from certain Central Asian countries.

Moscow apparently calculates that it could in that case arrange to
refer the request formally to the CSTO for consideration, so as to
press NATO into dealing with this Russia-led structure. One item in
the Minsk summit declaration (such documents are Moscow-drafted as
a rule) says that alliance obligations among CSTO member countries
take precedence over other obligations.

Participants in the Minsk summit approved measures designed to turn
the CSTO into a multifunctional organization. At Putin and Russian
Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov’s initiative and Lukashenka’s proposal,
the summit resolved to develop joint structures of the member
countries’ intelligence and law-enforcement agencies and Internal
Affairs ministries, as well as strengthen the Defense Ministries’
joint structures. Beyond its military and political-military remit,
the CSTO would create joint capabilities to deal with natural and
technological disasters, illegal migration, and the narcotics traffic.

Contrary to some expectations, the summit did not officially announce
an intent to create CSTO peacekeeping troops or a legal mechanism for
rendering emergency military assistance to member countries in the
event of aggression against them from outside the CSTO. Kocharian
in particular expressed regret over the failure to advance on the
assistance issue (Arminfo, Itar-Tass, June 23). For its part, Moscow
has developed a full-fledged concept for CSTO "peacekeeping" operations
within the CSTO area and collective participation in international
operations beyond that area. Moscow will almost certainly call in the
months ahead for adoption of this concept and a political decision
on creating CSTO peacekeeping troops.

The dual summit was timed to coincide with the final phase of a
Russia-Belarus military exercise, the largest-ever held in the CSTO’s
framework. Forces from Russia and Belarus comprise the CSTO’s "regional
group of forces" in the West, along with the Russian-Armenian group
and the Russian-led Central Asian group in the respective theaters.

(Interfax, Belarus Television Channel One, June 23, 24)