Yerevan "Banants" Wins Georgian "Ameri" 1:0 In First Match Of UEFA C

YEREVAN "BANANTS" WINS GEORGIAN "AMERI" 1:0 IN FIRST MATCH OF UEFA
CUP DRAW

Yerevan, July 14. ArmInfo. Yerevan "Banants" won Georgian "Ameri"
1:0 in the first match UEFA Cup draw in Georgia and now has good
chances to enter the next round. Ashtarak "Mika" yielded to Swiss
"Young Boys" 1:3.

After the return matches scheduled for July 27, 18 clubs, who start
competing from the second round, and 11 winners of Intertoto Cup will
join the 35 winners. The second selection stage draw will be held on
July 28 in Nyon. 32 strongest teams will enter the first circle of
the tournament, where they will be joined by another 48 clubs and 16
losers of the third selection round of Champions League.

"Mika" Defeated By Swiss "Young Boys" 1-3

"MIKA" DEFEATED BY SWISS "YOUNG BOYS" 1-3

YEREVAN, JULY 14, NOYAN TAPAN. On July 13, in the first tour of
qualification of the UEFA Cup Tournament Ashtarak "Mika" received Swiss
"Young Boys" at the Republican stadium of Yerevan and was defeated
with a score of 1 to 3. And the Yerevan "Banants" was received by
"Ameri" in Tbilisi and won 1-0. It should be mentioned that football
player of "Banants" Burdiyan received the secong yellow card at the
48th minute and the football players from Yerevan were able to the
keep the triumphal score with 10 players. The return games will be
held on July 27.

ANKARA: Top court upholds Dinks sentence

Top court upholds Dinks sentence

Turkish Daily News
Jul 13, 2006

The Supreme Court of Appeals General Council on Wednesday agreed to
approve Agos daily Editor in Chief Hrant Dink’s six-month suspended
sentence for "insulting Turkishness" despite the fact that the Supreme
Court of Appeals Prosecutor’s Office argued that Dink was not guilty
of any crime.

The Sisli Second Criminal Court had found Dink guilty of insulting
Turkishness and sentenced him to a six-month suspended sentence. The
Supreme Court of Appeals Ninth Bureau had reversed the suspension,
arguing there was no doubt Dink was guilty of committing the crime.
The decision to suspend the sentence by the Sisli Second Criminal Court
was appealed by Dink, who is seeking acquittal rather than suspension,
and the complainants.

The Supreme Court of Appeals Prosecutor’s Office had sought annulment
of the sentence, arguing that the material and emotional elements of
the crime "insulting Turkishness" had not taken place. The Ninth Bureau
said there was no doubt Dink’s statement, "The clean blood that will
replace the poisoned blood of the Turk is present in the honored veins
that will be established between the Armenian and Armenia," insulted
Turkishness. "It is impossible to justify belittling a society while
praising another with the freedom of expression as defined by the
European Convention on Human Rights," the bureau said.

Dink had argued that what he meant by the statement was that Armenians
had the strength to overcome their destructive hatred of Turks. The
prosecutor’s office can appeal the bureau’s decision, and if it
doesn’t, Dink will be retried by the Sisli Second Criminal Court in
accordance with the Supreme Court of Appeals’ pronouncement.

The prosecutor’s office noted its objection to the bureau’s decision,
arguing that according to the Turkish Penal Code (TSK) all critical
opinions voiced without insult would not require a jail sentence. The
office also argued that Dink’s article should be analyzed in its
entirety, not by analyzing words or sentences. The controversial
sentence Dink used could have two meanings, argued the office, adding,
"One can read the sentence alone and decide it is insulting, or read
the entire article and come to another conclusion." The office argued,
"While the words used may create controversy, disturb people and
create misunderstandings among those who failed to see the article
in its entirety, the author’s intentions should be taken into account."

The office also said Dink’s previous articles in the series should
also be read to understand his stance. Prosecutors said the poisoned
blood cited in the article did not belong to Turks but was the way
Armenians viewed Turks, which poisoned their identity. "That’s why
one needs to understand the fact that the article does not insult
Turks but rather warns Armenians about their attitude, which poisons
their blood. The office also noted that according to the Constitution,
"Turks" meant all citizens of Turkey, without discrimination between
religion or ethnicity, and that as a result the article could only
be viewed as a criticism of Turkish citizens of Armenian origin

BAKU: Azerbaijan: Aspirations, Regional Issues, and Global Concerns

Heritage.org, DC
July 12 2006

Azerbaijan: Aspirations, Regional Issues, and Global Concerns

by His Excellency Elmar Mammadyarov
Heritage Lecture #949

July 12, 2006 | |

(Delivered April 7, 2006)

Today, I would like to discuss Azerbaijan~Rs aspira­tions, regional
issues, as well as some global concerns we have in our part of the
world.

Azerbaijan restored its independence in 1991. Since then, we have
been conducting an active foreign policy, engaging the international
community as a member of the major international organizations. Thus,
our rela­tions with Western nations, and in particular with the
United States, are one of the crucial components of our foreign
policy priorities. This is very important to stress. Having lived in
the United States for almost twelve years, I witnessed U.S. policy
with regard to Azerbaijan moving from what they refer to as a
~Scoun­try of interest~T to ~Sstrategic ally.~T It is indeed very
impor­tant that our cooperation programs, particularly in the energy
sector as well as the security areas, are deepen­ing every year. It
brings with it very positive elements: for example, our latest
cooperative efforts in the area of democracy-building and protection
of human rights.

Rule of law is also extremely important for us, espe­cially keeping
in mind our past. We were a member of the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics and had our own parliament and constitution. But the major
fac­tors of being independent are a foreign and defense policy; these
were delegated to Moscow. And because of the Soviet style of command
economy, we had little experience as to what a real democracy meant,
or for that matter, what the rule of law or even protection of human
rights actually meant.

This year we will celebrate the fifteenth anniversary of our
independence. I can say that we have spent a great deal of time and
energy on introducing the basic elements of what we call the process
of democracy-building in the country. Sometimes it~Rs not an easy
process. Honestly speaking, our efforts sometimes need to be doubled.
But this is what we call a generational issue; we need to work on the
human capital in the country so that people also recognize what
democracy truly means.

Developing Energy Wealth

We~Rre continuing to do a good job in the area of economic
development. Most people here know that Azerbaijan is a region of oil
and gas. The sign­ing of a major oil contract in 1994 with the big
oil companies~Wwe called it the contract of the centu­ry~Wcreated a
solid foundation for our economic development.

Investment into the economy over the last 10 years was about $20
billion, which is pretty good for a population of 8 million. In the
initial years, it came mostly to the energy sector, of course, and
was around $15 billion. And we are really proud to say that $5
billion came to the non-oil sector. The development of the non-oil
sector is one of the major tasks the government faces right now. And
we already defined the niches where major efforts should be made:
agriculture, agribusiness, infra­structure, and tourism. Indeed, I~Rm
going to talk about them a little bit later.

After signing the ~Scontract of the century,~T we immediately started
to think about how to deliver these huge volumes of oil to the world
markets. The point is that Azerbaijan is a landlocked coun­try. We
have a water roads connection with the Black Sea and through the
Black Sea to the major ports of the world. But the Russian port of
Astra­khan, on the Volga, is under the ice almost four month a year.
So we started thinking how to deliver oil to the warm ports of the
world.

Then the idea to build a new pipeline came along. Of course, we
already have two existing pipelines. The first was built during the
Soviet Union, and it runs from Baku to the Russian port of
Novorossiysk on the Black Sea, with the capacity of 70 million tons
per year. That~Rs around 490 million barrels a year. It~Rs not so big,
but it was sufficient for the exploration of our oil resources at
this time.

Then after signing the contract for the initial pro­duction of oil,
we built another pipeline which connects Baku offshore with the Black
Sea port of Supsa. The pipeline itself, because it~Rs an earlier oil
pipeline, holds 5 million tons. That~Rs about 35 mil­lion barrels a
year.

Then we started to recognize that there is too much oil, particularly
in the Azerbaijan sector of the Caspian Sea. So the decision was made
to build up a huge pipeline running from Azerbaijan through Georgia
to the Turkish Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. The capacity of the
pipeline is 50 mil­lion tons of crude oil, which is roughly 1 million
barrels per day.

It is also possible that the capacity can be increased, even up to
1.2 million or 1.4 million barrels per day, and with the addition of
chemicals, it could reach 1.7 million barrels per day.

So the pipeline is a very big project. The cost is small~W$3 billion.
Currently, we are pumping oil inside the pipeline, and we are
expecting in the coming months~Wmost probably this summer~W that it
will be finally inaugurated with the first tanker of oil which will
run from Ceyhan.

We have inaugurated our part. The Georgians have inaugurated their
part of the pipeline. And now we are looking at all of us~Wthat is,
Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey~Wto inaugurate the last por­tion (the
Turkish part) of the pipeline. The route is approximately 1,720
kilometers. So if I~Rm not mis­taken, after the Alaskan pipeline, it~Rs
the second longest pipeline in the world.

Besides oil, we also have gas. And so we decided to build a gas
pipeline. Again, being landlocked, we have to build a pipeline which
can deliver gas to the consumers. And the pipeline, which runs
parallel with the oil pipeline, will deliver the natu­ral gas
supplies from Baku to Georgia and then to the Turkish city of
Erzurum, where it will be con­nected the Turkish gas network. And
through the Turkish gas network we can deliver our gas all over
Europe.

We signed a purchase agreement with Georgia on buying gas. And the
Turks are also committed to buying Azerbaijani gas. Negotiations with
Greece are going on, and they could be extended further to the
Balkans, even to Central Europe, which also has a serious market for
gas.

Fueling Economic Growth

This, of course, definitely brings a lot of econom­ic development
into the country. I can tell you that over the last three years, our
GDP growth has been more than 20 percent. In 2004, it was 19.5
percent. In 2005, it was 25.5 percent. In 2006, this year, we are
expecting it to be around 27 percent.

>>From another point of view, it is also a serious challenge for the
government. For example, last year we faced high rates of inflation
in the double digits. After strong, conservative efforts to curb this
infla­tion, we succeeded in closing the year with a 9.6 per­cent
inflation rate. In the first months of this year, we curbed the
inflation rate to 6 percent, which is also pretty high, but
nonetheless visible progress.

The government is also focusing on developing the non-oil sector.
This is a very crucial element. Traditionally we were very strong in
agriculture and agribusiness. Land privatization successfully
continues. Indeed, we have a lot of success stories. We restored and
increased the production of cot­ton, which is very important as a
strategic material.

And now we are heavily investing in vineyards. Unfortunately, these
vineyards were ruined during the Soviet anti-alcohol campaign and are
located in an area where you have to invest heavily and then wait for
five years before the first yield.

In order to support farmers with agricultural equipment, the
government created special pro­grams and funds. The government signed
a con­tract with Japan to buy agricultural equipment and machinery.
The government put $100 million into the fund for agro-leasing.
Beyond this, we estab­lished a fund to support farmers purchasing
fertil­izers. The fund was established last year with an initial
investment of $50 million.

So in the agriculture sphere, we have a huge market and we~Rre
optimistic that it will prove to be an important revenue stream for
the budget.

The other area is, of course, infrastructure. We~Rre investing heavily
in our infrastructure. We began with our roads and now we~Rre
increasing the capacity of our railroads. Azerbaijan is a member of
the North~V South Consortium together with the Russians, Indi­ans, and
Iranians. Right now the Iranians are building a railroad that they
want to connect through Azer­baijan to Russia and the north of
Europe.

On the other hand, together with the Georgians and Turks, we finished
a feasibility study on a rail­road between Georgia and Turkey, which
goes through Kars to Akhalkalaki (Kars is the Turkish city and
Akhalkalaki is the Georgian city). The fea­sibility study shows that
the project could cost $320 million, which is not a large amount
consid­ering the figures in our region, and it can be done within two
years. We expect that each of the three governments~WAzerbaijan,
Georgia, and Turkey~W will approve this project connecting their
coun­tries, and then through to Europe.

This is very important from the point of view of delivering
commodities, including oil. For exam­ple, our railroad companies
recently signed a con­tract with Chevron to deliver the oil by
railroads~W almost 20 million tons from the Tengiz onshore field in
Kazakhstan that will come from Kazakhstan by barges and then go to
Azerbaijan and Georgia. Now we~Rre thinking that in Georgian ports
they will transfer the oil into tankers and then later to a
rail­road. But the railroad will be built; you can imagine that it
will come not only through Georgia~W because there also still an issue
of the Bosporus~Wit will come through the Turkish ports on the
Medi­terranean. And I think it~Rs very, very serious win­dow, too, for
the development of the economy.

Security Partner

When we talk about economic development, security issues arise. Let
me offer just a few words about security. Azerbaijan is a member of
the ~Scoa­lition of the willing,~T having sent a contingent to Iraq.
Thank God, they are working quite success­fully. We do not have any
casualties so far, and I hope that we will continue our duty there to
bring peace and stability into Iraq, which is very, very important
for the greater Middle East.

We also sent a contingent to Kosovo and to Afghanistan. This is very,
very important for our tran­sition to a regional leader in our part
of the world, and indeed we are behaving as regional leaders in our
part of the world. Our involvement in peacekeeping operations, and
supporting and maintaining interna­tional peace and security, is one
of the commitments and obligations which we took on our shoulders.

Our cooperation with NATO within the Individ­ual Partnership Action
Plan is developing quite successfully. It~Rs very important for us to
reform our army. It~Rs very important for us to increase the
capa­bility of our army. We are working hard at doing this. Just last
month we made a round assessment with regard to the Partnership
Action Plan pro­grams and found areas in which we need to contin­ue
and deepen our cooperation

Besides that, of course, we have bilateral security relations and
programs. With the United States we~Rre developing it quite
successfully, starting with­in the Foreign Military Finance Program,
and also the International Military Education and Training (IMET)
program for Azerbaijani officers in United States military
institutions. So I think it runs within the national interest of
Azerbaijan for the general reforming of the whole country.

Seeking a Solution with Armenia

Now I am giving you this good picture of the development, but there
is always a problem. I should talk about the problem. And the major
problem is the conflict with our neighbor, Armenia.

With the occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and the large numbers of the
refugees, it is, of course, a huge political, economic, and social
burden. From an economic perspective, we can handle the issue. From
the perspective of the social burden, we have already approved
programs that assist the internal­ly displaced people and the
refugees with a special allocation of money from the oil fund of
Azer­baijan. The only spending so far has been done to support the
refugees. Instead of the tent camps where they used to live, we are
building mobile vil­lages so that when we achieve the liberation of
the territories, they can return to their homes. Last year there was
a fact-finding mission, which visited the occupied territories. They
clearly indicated and filed a report that everything that can be
stolen has been stolen, everything that can be destroyed has been
destroyed, and everything that can be looted has been looted. So at
least they will take these mobile houses when they return to their
villages.

The peace talks are, unfortunately, not as suc­cessful as one would
like, and I think that we need to double our efforts, mostly our
educational efforts. We have to explain-and we speak about this at
every meeting on the level of foreign minis­ters-that one cannot live
back in the 20th century. Indeed, the world has changed. The idea
that you can decide the fate of the territory by forcibly changing
borders, by ethnic cleansing, or by expel­ling the people is gone.
Everyone knows that this is the phenomenon of Yalta 1945, when the
three leaders came together and started drawing the lines that ended
up dividing the world.

Now it’s gone. International relations have changed. The people have
changed. And the role of the borders is diminished.

So the major priority-what we need to do-is to create the possibility
for the normalization of the lives of those who used to live there
for centuries, both Armenians and Azerbaijanis. No one can just expel
them from the territory.

That’s why I’m saying that 2006 can definitely be a window of
opportunity. As soon as Azerbaijan is developing successfully from
the economic point of view, we’ll definitely develop the military as
well. And when frustration comes to the society and peo­ple ask why
should we keep our eyes closed on the occupation of our territories,
then it can be a very serious challenge to the peace and stability in
the region.

And that’s why we ought to begin to clear the table for finding a
real, durable solution. And a durable solution works only within a
legal context. We have definitely found out that any agreement, any
decision-making with regard to the conflict resolution should be
based on the law, particularly the international norms and principles
of this law.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a part of Azerbaijan, and no one can change the
territorial integrity by force. We will move slowly and find out the
way in which to normalize the life between the two communities,
because the hatred which has existed now is defi­nitely not
productive for the development of the region.

His Excellency Elmar Mammadyarov is Minister of Foreign Affairs of
the Republic of Azerbaijan.

iaandEurasia/hl949.cfm

–Boundary_(ID_Xxm7XoigmE2 F+VA2aC3v7A)–

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Russ

BAKU: Azeri Amb. to Italy meets with Italian Dep. FM

AMBASSADOR TO ITALY MEETS WITH ITALIAN DEPUTY FOREIGN MINISTER
[July 11, 2006, 20:47:41]

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
July 11 2006

Ambassador of Azerbaijan in Rome Italy Emil Kerimov met here on
Monday with Faminao Krucianelli, the Italian Deputy Foreign Minister
responsible for relations with the South Caucasus.

The Ambassador congratulated Mr. Krucianelli on his new appointment and
Italy’s becoming a football World Cup winner. He added that on this
occasion, Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev had sent congratulatory
messages to his Italian counterpart Giorgio Napolitano and Prime
Minister of the country Romano Prodi.

Mr. Kerimov pointed out that there are wide opportunities for deepening
relations between the two countries in all fields. He described Italy
as Azerbaijan’s large trade partner mentioning that such Italian
companies as Edison, Technimont and Fincantieri show great interest
in making business in Azerbaijan.

The Ambassador thanked the Italian side for rendering technical and
humanitarian assistance to Azerbaijan. He stressed the necessity
of organizing a political dialogue between leaderships of the two
countries after reshufflings in the Italian government.

Mr. Krucianelli said Italy is interested in expanding relations with
Azerbaijan noting the country is located in a very important region,
possesses rich natural resources and huge economic potential. He added
his country is striving for enhancement of cooperation in not only
energy but also other sectors of the economy. Mr. Krucianelli also
pointed out Italy’s intention to contribute to democratic development
in Azerbaijan.

Ambassador Kerimov dwelt on democratic reforms being implemented
in Azerbaijan, and the policy conducted by the government towards
economic development and bettering people’s well-being. He noted,
however, that full-scale development of the region is being hampered
by the aggressive policy of Armenia resulted in occupation of 20% of
the Azerbaijan’s territories, destruction of cultural monuments on
the occupied territories, ethnic cleansing and plight of more than
one million Azerbaijani refugees and internally displaced people.
"All this poses serious threat to security and regional cooperation
in the Caucasus," he said. Taking the chance, Mr. Kerimov thanked
the Italian side for the support of the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan. He added that Azerbaijan wants this conflict to be resolved
on the basis of the norms and principles of the international law,
and within the framework of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

Mr. Krucianelli expressed regret about the unresolved conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh noting his country is ready to contribute to peaceful
resolution of the problem. He added that the existing conflicts in
the South Caucasus jeopardize stability and security in the region,
and stressed the need for more active involvement of the European
Union in the process of their settlement.

David Nalbandian Ranked Third by Tennis Association

DAVID NALBANDIAN RANKED THIRD BY TENNIS ASSOCIATION

Armenpress

YEREVAN, JULY 11, ARMENPRESS: With 3,185 points, the
Argentinean-Armenian tennis-player David Nalbandian is the third
highest ranked by the Professional Tennis Association.

The list is topped by Roger Federer of Switzerland with 7,260 points,
the winner of the Wimbledon, followed by Rafael Nadal of Spain who has
5,125 points. Ivan Ljubicic from Croatia is fourth with 3, 125 points.

Armenian and Lebanese Foreign Ministers Give High Estimation To Rela

ARMENIAN AND LEBANESE FOREIGN MINISTERS GIVE HIGH ESTIMATION TO
RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO COUNTRIES

YEREVAN, JULY 11, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. On July 11, Lebanese
Foreign Minister Fawzi Salloukh held a joint press conference with RA
Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian. The press conference was dedicated
to the evaluation of Armenian-Lebanese relations, prospects of
their development and summing up the results of the Lebanese Foreign
Minister’s visit to Armenia.

Both Ministers highly appreciated the current level of bilateral
relations between Armenia and Lebanon and pointed to great
possibilities of further development and deepening of these
relations. "The political will of both countries, the Armenian Diaspora
in Lebanon, as well as the legislative base contributes to development
of bilateral relations," Vartan Oskanian declared.

He expressed satisfaction with the results of the meeting with
his Lebanese colleague: "I am content with the negotiations and I
think that Fawzi Salloukh’s visit will become a stimulus for further
development of bilateral relations between Armenia and Lebanon."

In his turn, Fawzi Salloukh highly evaluated the activity of
the Armenian Diaspora in Lebanon: "Lebanon is proud that a large
Armenian Diaspora lives there. We are proud that Armenians make a
great contribution to the prosperity of Lebanon."

The Lebanese Foreign Minister also declared that the Lebanese people
highly estimates the constructive role the representatives of the
Armenian Diaspora played in the complicated situation in the middle
of 70-s. H informed that he has invited Vartan Oskanian to take part
in the sitting of the Armenian-Lebanese Intergovernmental Commission
to be held in Lebanon.

TBILISI: Armenian, Georgian prime ministers talk up bilateral cooper

Armenian, Georgian prime ministers talk up bilateral cooperation
By Christina Tashkevich

The Messenger, Georgia
July 10 2006

The number of tourists coming to Georgia from Armenia has tripled,
Georgian Prime Minister said over the weekend in Batumi, while Armenian
investors are also expressing much more interest.

"We are seeing intensive developments in Georgian-Armenian trade
and economic relations. This is not only the tripling of Armenian
tourists, which brings an additional USD 15-20 million revenue to
the country compared with last year, but also we see the more active
interest of Armenian investors towards the Georgian economy," Zurab
Noghaideli said.

He met with Armenian Prime Minister, Andranik Margaryan, for the
fifth session of the Armenian-Georgian intergovernmental commission
on economic cooperation from June 7-10 in Batumi.

The sides discussed cooperation in the fields of agriculture, energy,
customs, transport and communication, education and tourism. The prime
ministers agreed to create a working group to discuss the possibility
of the reconstruction of the Kars-Gyumri-Tbilisi railway line.

Margaryan also said the Armenian government is ready to contribute
to rehabilitation programmes for the Javakheti region, which borders
Armenia and is 90 percent populated by ethnic Armenians. He said
Armenia agreed to participate in the reconstruction of several
educational facilities in Javakheti.

The Armenian side noted that an important contribution to the
improvement of relations between the two countries was the abolition
of road tax this spring. All types of transport entering Armenia from
Georgia no longer pay taxes, in line with a decision reached by the
governments this spring.

Previously, owners of public and cargo vehicles needed to pay between
USD 200-280, while owners of other cars USD 18-20 to pass from Georgian
territory into Armenia.

The forth session of the commission was held in last September
in Yerevan.

Both Georgia and Armenia note that several decisions taken at the
session last year have already been fulfilled. The governments signed
agreements on car communication between countries, on a joint crackdown
on car hijacking, and recently opened rail link Yerevan-Tbilisi-Batumi.

27 new aids cases recorded in Armenia in Jan-May 2006

27 NEW AIDS CASES RECORDED IN ARMENIA IN JAN-MAY 2006

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 10 2006

YEREVAN, July 10. /ARKA/. Twenty-seven new AIDS cases and 26 new HIV
cases were recorded in Armenia in January-May 2006. The RA Statistical
Service reports that one HIV-infected child under 14 was registered
during the period under review.

Twenty-one AIDS cases and 27 HIV cases were recorded during the
corresponding period of last year.

In May 2006 alone, seven new AIDS cases and 11 new HIV cases were
recorded in Armenia against 0 and 3 cases in May 2005. In May 2006,
one HIV-infected child under 14 was registered. P.T. -0–

Georgia fumes as Russia closes border crossing

Georgia fumes as Russia closes border crossing

ITAR-TASS news agency, Moscow
8 Jul 06

Stavropol, 8 July: The Russian high-altitude border crossing point
Verkhniy Lars on the Georgian Military Highway that links Russia and
Georgia was closed today for planned rebuilding work. As an ITAR-TASS
correspondent was informed at the headquarters of the Russian
Federation Federal Security Service’s North Caucasus directorate,
the repairs are being accompanied by a complete cessation of freight
and human transit both from Georgia and from Russia, and the Georgian
side was notified of this several months ago. "There was nothing
unexpected about this for anyone," the agency’s source noted.

At the same time, as ITAR-TASS correspondent Eka Mekhuzla has reported
from Tbilisi, Georgian Prime Minister Zurab Noghaideli has declared
that the Russian side’s decision to close traffic through the Verkhniy
Lars checkpoint "was not coordinated" with Tbilisi. According to
Noghaideli, he has "instructed the Georgian Foreign Ministry to
clarify the causes" of the Russian side’s closure of the checkpoint.

According to the HQ of the Russian Federation Federal Security
Service’s North Caucasus directorate, the Nizhniy Zaramag Russian
border crossing point continues to function round the clock on the
Russian-Georgian state border. It is based at the Roki Pass on the
Transcaucasus Highway. According to the HQ, "there are no queues
of vehicles or of citizens of Georgia or Russia crossing the border
there – there are no difficulties over border transit".

"The volume of reconstruction at Verkhniy Lars is large. New border
control services fitted with the most up-to-date equipment will
be installed, and living conditions for officers and men are to
be fundamentally improved – so it is not possible at the moment to
name a date for the completion of the rebuilding work with sufficient
precision," the HQ of the North Caucasus border directorate notes. The
only thing that is clear is that "Verkhniy Lars will resume operations
only when the upgrade work is fully completed", the HQ said.

[The Georgian Foreign Ministry has issued an official statement
condemning the closure of the Verkhniy Lars border crossing as an
"unfriendly" act, according to RIA Novosti news agency, Moscow, in
Russian 1451 gmt 8 Jul 06. "This decision of Russia’s is an attempt
to put pressure on Georgia. We view the closure of the border as
an unfriendly and provocative act whose aim is to discredit Georgia
in the eyes of the world community and to put economic and political
pressure on it." The ministry appealed to the "world community to make
an objective assessment of Russia’s calculated and improper actions
against Georgia so that a possible escalation of the situation can
be avoided and the situation on this sector of the Georgian-Russian
border can be defused in good time".

The agency said the Russian charge d’affaires has been summoned to
the Georgian Foreign Ministry and handed a protest note that says
Georgian border guards were given two hours’ notice of the closure
by fax, when at least three months’ notice would have been required
under a 1993 agreement.

Speaking during a visit to Batumi, Armenian Prime Minister Andranik
Markaryan said the closure of Verkhniy Lars "will be a serious problem
for Yerevan" as agricultural produce from Armenia passes through the
crossing point, and the only alternative is the Georgian port of Poti,
RIA Novosti news agency, Moscow, in Russian 1518 gmt 8 Jul 06 said.]