BREAKING: Azerbaijani authorities detain ICRC evacuee en route from Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia

 14:25,

YEREVAN, JULY 29, ARMENPRESS. Azerbaijani authorities have detained an elderly man who was being evacuated by the International Community of the Red Cross (ICRC) from Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia for treatment, Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) State Minister Gurgen Nersisyan said Saturday.

The patient is a 68-year-old citizen of Nagorno-Karabakh. The detained patient has been taken to another location by Azerbaijani authorities. 

Nersisyan said that a representative of the ICRC is now with the detained citizen.

“At this moment the ICRC representative is with our citizen, but the negotiations haven’t produced any results so far, we are waiting for new information,” Nersisyan said.

Other patients have been evacuated to a hospital in Goris by a Red Cross representative who arrived from Goris. The evacuation was carried out via the same route. However, the planned return of those who have completed treatment in Armenia has been cancelled.

Nersisyan said that the Azerbaijani authorites were always trying to obstruct the ICRC medical evacuations by bringing forward new conditions, and that this move was yet another step to make people fear using Lachin Corridor even for essential healthcare purposes.

EU’s Peaceful Push: Empowering Azerbaijan-Armenia Talks Amidst Russia’s Offer


NewsTrackLive

Bussels: On Saturday, the European Union urged Azerbaijan and Armenia to avoid “violence and harsh rhetoric” at the most recent round of negotiations in a protracted peace process in which Russia is also attempting to maintain a dominant position.

Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia met with EU Council President Charles Michel in Brussels for talks aimed at ending more than three decades of hostilities.

The two nations have engaged in two wars over Nagorno-Karabakh, a small mountainous region that is a part of Azerbaijan but is home to about 120,000 ethnic Armenians, since the fall of the Soviet Union.

According to Armenia, the proposed peace treaty should grant them special rights and ensure their security. In a June interview with Reuters, Azerbaijan’s foreign minister Jeyhun Bayramov rejected that demand, calling it unnecessary and an attempt to meddle in the internal affairs of the country.

The following actions that must be taken soon will determine whether or not there is real progress. In order to create the ideal atmosphere for peace and normalization talks, violence and abrasive rhetoric must end immediately, Michel said.

“The population on the ground needs reassurances, most importantly regarding their rights and security,” he told reporters.

Michel claimed that in order to foster trust between Azerbaijan and the Armenians of Karabakh, the EU encouraged Azerbaijan to speak with them directly.

Aliyev and Pashinyan left without giving reporters a press briefing, so it was unclear how he responded. No nation recognizes Nagorno-Karabakh’s de facto government, despite its claims to independence.

Along with the EU, the United States has been pressuring the parties to come to a peace agreement. The conflict in Ukraine has diverted Russia, the traditional power broker in the region, and it now runs the risk of having less influence.

On Saturday, Russia declared that it was prepared to arrange a trilateral meeting between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia at the level of foreign ministers. The Foreign Ministry stated in a statement that a summit in Moscow to sign a peace treaty could take place after this..

It stated that “reliable and clear guarantees of the rights and security of the Armenians of Karabakh” and implementation of prior agreements between Russia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia should be an essential component of this agreement.

https://english.newstracklive.com/news/eus-peaceful-push-empowering-azerbaijanarmenia-talks-amidst-russias-offer-sc57-nu355-ta355-1285111-1.html

Armenpress: A genuine Baku-Stepanakert dialogue should start- Toivo Klaar

 10:58,

YEREVAN, JULY 10, ARMENPRESS. A genuine Baku-Stepanakert dialogue should start with the aim of providing alternatives to violence, build much-needed confidence and ensure dignity. As reports ARMENPRESS, Toivo Klaar, the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the Crisis in Georgia wrote about this on his Twitter page. Klaar emphasized that the European Union looks forward to upcoming trilateral Brussels meeting with Armenia and Azerbaijan leaders.

“A day that began with promise again ended in disappointment and frustration. As reiterated many times by the EU, it is crucial that the flow of energy supplies be restored without restrictions, as well as the movement of people and goods via the Lachin corridor”, Klaar wrote expressing his feelings due to the suspension  of natural gas supply to Nagorno-Karabakh by Azerbaijan.

Turkish Press: Russian, Armenian leaders discuss situation in Karabakh over phone

Turkey – July 5 2023

Russian, Armenian leaders discuss situation in Karabakh over phone

President Putin, Armenian Premier Pashinyan discuss ensuring unhindered transport links along Lachin road

17:15 . 5/07/2023 Wednesday
AA

Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed the situation in Karabakh in a phone call with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, the Kremlin said on Wednesday.

According to a Kremlin statement, the two leaders discussed, among other things, ensuring unhindered transport links along the Lachin road – a mountain corridor that Armenia has used to access the Karabakh region now controlled by Azerbaijan.

“The fundamentally important meaning of the consistent implementation of the entire set of agreements of the leaders of Russia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan in 2020-2022 was emphasized,” it said.

The president confirmed Russia’s readiness to continue to provide practical assistance in the development of the Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty.

Putin and Pashinyan agreed to stay in touch, the statement added.

ICRC evacuates 15 patients from blockaded Nagorno Karabakh

 14:14, 5 July 2023

YEREVAN, JULY 5, ARMENPRESS. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) facilitated on July 5 the transfer of 15 patients from Nagorno Karabakh to hospitals in Armenia for treatment, the Nagorno Karabakh healthcare ministry said in a statement.

The 15 patients traveled with their attendants.

The ICRC plans to transport today 17 other patients who’ve completed treatment in Armenia back to Nagorno Karabakh.

28 children are hospitalized in the Arevik clinic. 4 of them are in neonatal and intensive care.

Another 96 patients are hospitalized in the Republican Medical Center in Stepanakert. 7 are in intensive care, 4 of whom are critically ill.

Lachin Corridor, the only road connecting Nagorno Karabakh with Armenia and the rest of the world, has been blocked by Azerbaijan since late 2022. The Azerbaijani blockade constitutes a gross violation of the 2020 Nagorno Karabakh ceasefire agreement, which established that the 5km-wide Lachin Corridor shall be under the control of Russian peacekeepers. Furthermore, on February 22, 2023 the United Nations’ highest court – the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – ordered Azerbaijan to “take all steps at its disposal” to ensure unimpeded movement of persons, vehicles and cargo along the Lachin Corridor in both directions.  Azerbaijan has been ignoring the order ever since. Moreover, Azerbaijan then illegally installed a checkpoint on Lachin Corridor. The blockade has led to shortages of essential products such as food and medication. Azerbaijan has also cut off gas and power supply into Nagorno Karabakh, with officials warning that Baku seeks to commit ethnic cleansing against Armenians in Nagorno Karabakh. Hospitals have suspended normal operations and the Red Cross has been facilitating the medical evacuations of patients.

Armenia, Azerbaijan FMs meet US counterpart in Washington

MEHR News Agency, Iran

TEHRAN, Jun. 28 (MNA) – The meeting of Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan, Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Jeyhun Bayramov, and United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken was held in Washington.

“Meeting between Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia [Ararat Mirzoyan], the US Secretary of State [Antony Blinken] took place in Washington D.C. Issues of regional security & stability, normalization process between Armenia and Azerbaijan were discussed,” the press service of the Armenian Foreign Ministry wrote on Twitter.

According to the ministry, the delimitation process between Armenia and Azerbaijan based on the Alma-Ata Declaration and 1975 map, as well as the “withdrawal of troops from the border”, and “appropriately addressing rights and security issues of people of Nagorno Karabakh” were highlighted as important factors for “lasting peace in the region.”

MNA/PR

News Code 202561

Complete unblocking of Lachin Corridor will contribute to de-escalation of the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh. Zakharova

 19:00,

YEREVAN, JUNE 28, ARMENPRESS. The complete unblocking of the Lachin Corridor will contribute to the de-escalation of the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh, ARMENPRESS reports, the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, said during the weekly briefing, commenting on the latest incident in Nagorno-Karabakh.

According to her, Moscow is concerned about frequent armed incidents in Nagorno-Karabakh and violations of the ceasefire regime.

“We call on the parties to exercise restraint and settle all disputed issues in a peaceful, political-diplomatic way, in cooperation with the command of the Russian peacekeeping troops. And we believe that prompt steps to unblock the Lachin Corridor and create conditions for the normal life of the civilian population will contribute to the de-escalation of the situation,” said Zakharova.

On the night of June 28, the armed forces of Azerbaijan shelled the Armenian positions located in Martuni and Martakert regions of Nagorno-Karabakh, drones were also used. 4 Armenian soldiers were killed.




A warm welcome or an act of domination? News reporting of Armenia-Turkey relations

UK –

Kübra Zeynep Sarıaslan, a visiting fellow in Contemporary Turkish Studies at LSE’s European Institute, explains the challenges for independent journalists in Turkey posed by the visit of an Armenian leader, and how the principles of peace journalism can be a useful approach on such occasions..

May 2023 was a very long month for Turkey. Presidential elections lasted the whole month due to the run-off. When Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was re-elected at the end, many world leaders lined up to congratulate him, and many countries seem to have expectations from post-election Turkey and its new and former leader Erdoğan. Among these were countries of the South Caucasus, a region often in the world spotlight for its conflicts and military activity. The prime minister of Georgia, Irakli Garibashvili, and the president of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, already have close ties with Erdoğan. However, it was breaking news to all news outlets in Turkey that Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was also going to attend the ceremony. For independent journalists in Turkey, the visit of an Armenian leader to Turkey after more than a dozen years was an interesting test.

Although it is a neighbouring country with historical significance, Armenia is not a country that journalists in Turkey follow very closely, not even those who cover news about the larger region. Besides, the lack of mutual trust between political authorities hinders journalistic relations. When I talked to a journalist working for the foreign desk of an independent news outlet in Turkey, he said that he had repeatedly asked for a meeting with Pashinyan within last couple of years, but so far, he was neither refused nor accepted. He said this has something to do with trust: “I don’t think it is easy for them either. When an Armenian prime minister talks to a Turkish newspaper, one wrong word coming from his mouth will be a problem…”

Pashinyan, a journalist himself, led the Velvet Revolution in 2018 and then led the new government that ousted Armenia’s long-time rulers. He was re-elected with popular support as a prime minister after snap elections in 2021, even though Armenia was defeated under his administration during the 44-day war with Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020. However, Pashinyan set Armenia’s priorities as economic development, sustainable stable relations with neighbours, and democratization of society, rather than global recognition of the Armenian genocide and the maintenance of Armenian sovereignty in Nagorno-Karabakh. Due to these political decisions, as well as his open criticism of the stigmatisation of both Turkey and Turks, Pashinyan has been the target of domestic opposition for some time. Turkey and Armenia have been holding talks for some time to normalise relations. As a result of these contacts, there is a possibility that the two countries are very close to diplomatic recognition for the first time since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. Pashinyan’s decision to accept Erdoğan’s invitation to attend the inauguration ceremony shows that Pashinyan is committed to the political position he has pursued so far.

However, the pro-Erdoğan Turkish media covering Pashinyan’s visit fed into the existing political pressures with inflammatory and speculative coverage that might, as feared, put Armenia’s current government in a difficult position. In recent weeks, during a press conference on the ongoing negotiations with Azerbaijan, Pashinyan had said that Armenia was ready to recognize Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity, including Nagorno-Karabakh, but that the rights and security of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians should be discussed through the Baku-Stepanakert dialogue. State owned Anadolu Agency reported this statement as it is in English, but did not include the conditions on the rights and security of the Armenians in Turkish version of the news. This is already a fault for journalistic ethics yet not very surprising when it comes to conventional media in Turkey nowadays. What about independent media?

Relations between Armenia and Turkey are complicated by the tragic history of the 1915 genocide and the Turkish government’s denial of it, the absence of diplomatic links, a closed land border and politically fostered mistrust and hostility between the communities. There have been several attempts at the state level to normalise diplomatic ties over the last three decades, but none of these have had any meaningful impact. On the other hand, civil society in both countries, especially since the mid-2000s, has tried to improve relations in various fields, including journalism. In this process, peace journalism appeared as a useful tool for conflict transformation, pointing out that reporting in favour of peace is a political and ethical option and underlining that contextual pressures and constraints can in fact be overcome even through individual editorial choices.

Independent journalists define their editorial policy as reporting in a more pro-peace, solution-oriented way rather than something that will further fuel that polarisation. However, in the Turkish news media environment, such editorial choices are possible only through financial independence. In the past years, many opposition journalists have lost their jobs due to political pressure on media owners who have close business ties with the government. Yet dissident journalists experimented with unconventional financial models and have built several independent news media outlets. Utilising the possibilities of online journalism that has been already replacing conventional journalism, journalists working for independent news media report on marginalised people and groups in Turkey whose representations are not available on popular news outlets, and feed alternative public spheres interested in stories represented from various angles and with depth.

Yet, many journalists working for independent news media in Turkey, are not very much aware of the independent news media elsewhere, especially in small countries like Armenia. A journalist from Turkey explains what sources they use while reporting on Armenia: “Armenia is in our foreign news category like any other country. We talk about it in the same way as we talk about it in any other country. When the local media give the number of troops differently, we give it as ‘Armenian media said this, Azeri media said that, and Reuters said that.’” But Armenian independent journalism remains in the margins of information sources for journalists in Turkey. The result of following foreign news predominantly from third sources – even if these sources are the world’s leading news agencies – can be misleading for journalists in Turkey and, naturally, for their audiences.

An example of such confusions is the circulation of a short clip from Erdoğan’s inauguration ceremony on Twitter. The clip shows a newspaper columnist greeting Pashinyan with a handshake and saying, “do not feel yourself alone, you have friends in Turkey”. Meanwhile, the newspaper where this columnist works, a pro-government newspaper with an openly ultranationalist and militarist tone, released a video on its YouTube channel representing Pashinyan’s visit as a one-sided initiative as if he had not received the invitation from Erdoğan and with a subtext that demonises Armenians living in diaspora communities. This video alone hints that there is more than a benevolent gesture in the handshake clip, but some independent journalists celebrated it and congratulated the warm gesture shown towards the antagonised leader of the neighbouring country, which signals a failure in diplomatic reporting.

Armenia is not a “complete stranger” to Turkey – and vice versa. While the Turkish state’s relations with the Armenian state are followed with great curiosity and interest in Armenia, it may seem unfair to expect the same curiosity and interest from Turkish journalists who are dealing with an extremely dynamic and intense agenda of domestic politics. Still, journalists who cannot read between the lines when an Armenian Prime Minister visits Turkey after 14 years cannot take on the task of building the language of peace at a time when peace journalism is most needed in today’s polarised societies.

Following independent news sources that provide in-depth information on their subject of interest could be a good first step for independent diplomacy journalists who genuinely support peace.

The research that resulted in this paper has been funded by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation. This post does not represent the position of the Media@LSE blog nor of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Kübra Zeynep Sarıaslan is a visiting fellow at the LSE Turkish Studies and at the University of Cambridge. She holds a PhD in Social Anthropology from the University of Zurich (Switzerland).

The volume of construction works in Armenia increased by 36.0% in January-April 2023. growth is the highest in EAEU

 18:36,

YEREVAN, JUNE 26, ARMENPRESS. Armenia recorded the highest growth rate of construction works among EAEU member states in January-April 2023, ARMENPRESS reports, Taron Chakhoyan, Deputy Head of the Prime Minister’s Office, informed on his “Facebook” page.

“The volume of construction works in Armenia increased by 36.0%, in Kazakhstan – by 15.4%, in Kyrgyzstan – by 8.7%, in Russia – by 7.4%, in Belarus – by 3.3%.

According to the data of the National Statistical Committee of Armenia, the construction sector in Armenia increased by 16% in 4 months to 94.9 billion AMD. Most of the construction works were carried out in the field of real estate (the share in the total structure: 53.7%), in the provision of electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning (the share: 10.6%), in the field of transport (the share: 5.5%)”, the Deputy Head of the Prime Minister’s Office added.

Serving audiences when they need it most in Armenia

June 2023

A special conference in Yerevan explored the media’s vital role in crisis

In May 2023, we organised a conference, Serving audiences when they need it most: the key role of media in emergencies,  conference, in Yerevan to support our European Union-funded project, European Media Facility in Armenia.

International, local, and regional media experts came together to discuss the vital role that media plays during times of crisis. Those at the conference looked at how to provide audiences with essential and trustworthy information that can save lives, help people cope in difficult circumstances, and combat disinformation during emergencies.

The conference also featured keynote speeches, panel discussions, and workshops to provide attendees with practical insights and tools for media production and cross-sector coordination.

We followed up with some of our partners to explore their views and takeaways of the role of media in an emergency.

Susanna ShahnazaryanGoris Press Club

Susanna Shahnazaryan of Armenia’s Goris Press Club shares her thoughts on the challenges of working regional media, and what she learned from BBC Media Action’s training.

Working in regional media in a conflict region presents a number of challenges. As well as having to consider the safety of our team, we have limited resources available – including financial, people, and professional skills. There are no support departments to help us. And journalists often focus on specific topics, so it can be difficult to produce new content about emerging issues.

The skills gained during the BBC Media Action training, focusing on presenting social problems through human stories, have been very helpful for the team. Using these skills, we’re able to make our content even better by presenting a whole range of issues in each story, instead of focusing on a single story.

It’s very difficult to talk about tolerance in a conflict-affected region. We must remember the war is not yet over and we are still seeing human losses. As a result, we have to invest a lot of effort and time in the audience, when we talk about tolerance, ensuring security, and emphasising the need for development.

The BBC Media Action resources are really important. As well as enabling us to reflect on current developments in our country and what they mean for our people, they help us to look after the professional needs of the team.

As surprising as it may be, regional media in Armenia are often less politicised than national media, because political life is focused on our capital city, Yerevan. This offers our regional journalists more opportunities in terms of themes they cover. And now we are able to use new media tools to write about human interest, non-political stories.

There’s a misconception that the most important news is always in the national news. We must remember that life in the regions also plays an important part in our national landscape.

I think it was also noticeable in our discussion in Yerevan how different our challenges are, especially our risks relating to tolerance.

Comparing experiences with other similar organisations is really helpful for Armenian journalists. It would be wonderful for those working in a small editorial office to have experience with media outlets across and even outside Armenia, to see how others plan their work, and how they find their stories.

Nikolay GrigoryanDirector, Artakarg Alik Information Centre

Nikolay Grigoryan is director of the Artakarg Alik Information Centre, and has been working for many years with journalists about how to report in emergencies.

In BBC Media Action’s training, we gained respect for the BBC’s editorial standards. The editorial guidelines are very helpful and showcase some really interesting examples. As well as being thought-provoking, the guidelines were a springboard for discussing and comparing similar cases.

I think the BBC Media Action conference brought us closer to the BBC and was a great opportunity to meet local partners. It helped us find out more about their work and our common concerns.

It was very important for us all to discuss emergency communications and how we apply our knowledge, skills and journalistic ethics. It raises many questions. Is the news helpful, harmful, hindering, human-centred, or just populism or sensational?

Armenian journalists working in emergency situations have to deal with a range of challenges, not least a lack of knowledge and professionalism. As well as needing to check and verify sources, experts and eyewitnesses, they also need to think about the questions they ask. Even when attending the scene of an accident, journalists are not prepared and don’t think of those preliminary questions.

It’s also a big challenge for Armenian journalists when state institutions and officials are unavailable. Without official sources, stories may be inconsistent and not objective – but often the media is in a hurry to break news. Too often they want to make instant, exclusive, sensationalist stories. The public want the news and expect to know what’s going on. They want to know what’s happened and what the governing bodies are doing.

Having worked in numerous roles in crisis management, since establishing the Emergency Channel TV programme after the Spitak earthquake in 1988, I know reporting on emergency situations must be accurate. It has to be objective, impartial, reliable and trustworthy. I’ve covered all our disasters and wars over the last 40 years, and I know in emergency situations, a lack of accurate news creates rumours, misinformation, panic and chaos.

When dealing with crisis communications, it’s very important that everyone knows their place and role. They must recognise how information flows from the governing bodies, the response organisations, the news services, and the media.

I would welcome further work with BBC Media Action and the Emergency Channel, to provide journalists with simulated scenario training.

As well as training Armenian journalists, this opportunity could be extended to help other stakeholders, including the government, ministries and departments, utility companies, international organisations and news services.

European Media Facility in Armenia – Building Sustainable and Professional Media project is implemented by DW Akademie, BBC Media Action, Open Society Foundation – Armenia, Hetq/ Investigative Journalists NGO and Factor TV, and is funded by the European Union and the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ).


https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/where-we-work/europe-and-caucasus/armenia/serving-audiences-in-armenia/