Chess: A Proud Day For Armenia

A PROUD DAY FOR ARMENIA
By Malcolm Pein

The Daily Telegraph, UK
May 8 2007

Levon Aronian won both games against the world champion Levon Aronian
on day two of Rapid Chess Match at the Yerevan Opera House. Aronian
leads 3-1 with two to play after winning with both colours.

Armenia has a fine chess tradition being the homeland of the former
World Champion Tigran Petrosian. This match is of such importance in
Armenia that the Prime Minister is the patron of the event. The rise
of Aronian to world number five and the country’s success at the Chess
Olympiads and World Team Championships has made the whole nation proud.

In the words of the Armenian Prime Minister Serge Sargsyan:

‘Armenia has a true passion for chess – it is the land of Tigran
Petrosian and of Olympic Champions. Chess is part and parcel of
Armenia’s daily life, and it is hard to find a household in Armenia
where this venerated game is not played. Indeed, we glorify our beloved
famous grandmasters, likewise holding the legendary greats from around
the world in the highest regard and extending to them our sincere
hospitality.’ Now close your eyes for a moment and try and imagine such
words from a British Prime Minister or indeed any western politician.

Aronian’s win in the third game

L Aronian (2759) – V Kramnik (2772) Rapid Match Yerevan (4) Semi Slav
25′ + 10"

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.g4 (The
Shabalov Attack, if Black takes on g4 then White plays Rg1 and takes
back on g7) 7…dxc4 8.Bxc4 Nd5 9.Ne4 Be7 10.Bd2 b6 11.Ng3! 0-0 12.e4
Nb4 13.Qb3 c5 (Kramnik must have prepared this but it gives White
the centre and a simple plan of charging down the kingside. Having an
obvious plan is very helpful in 25 minute games) 14.Bxb4 cxb4 15.0-0
a6 16.Qe3 b5 17.Bd3 Bb7 18.g5 Rc8 19.Rad1 Qb6 (19…Nb6 20.b3 Rc3!?)
20.Bb1 Rfd8 21.h4 Nf8 22.h5 (Because White controls the centre he
can afford to weaken his kingside. Black is drifting) 22…Rc7 23.Qf4
Bd6 24.e5 Be7 25.Be4 Bc8 26.Bb1 Bb7 27.Be4 Bc8 28.Kh2 Rcd7 (28…Bb7
29.h6 Ng6 30.Qe3 and a white knight might find its way to f6) 29.Bb1
Bb7 30.Ne4 Bxe4 31.Bxe4 (White intends Rg1 and g5-g6) 31…g6 32.hxg6
Nxg6 33.Qe3 Bf8 34.Kg2 (h7 is an obvious target) 34…Bg7 35.Rh1
Qb8 36.Rc1 Qa7 37.Rh3 Rxd4 (Already desperate) 38.Rd1! (A nasty pin
38.Nxd4 Qxd4 39.Rc8 Qd7 40.Rxd8+ Qxd8 41.f4 is also good) 38…Nf4+
(38…Bxe5 39.Nxe5 Nxe5 40.Rxh7 Ng6 41.Rdh1) 39.Kh2 Ne2 40.Rd2 (Winning
the knight or the rook) 40…Bxe5+ 41.Nxe5 Qc7 42.Bxh7+ Kf8 43.Rxe2 1-0

Armenian Sports Leadership Arrives In Baku

ARMENIAN SPORTS LEADERSHIP ARRIVES IN BAKU

Panorama.am
19:48 07/05/2007

Representatives of the Armenian sports leadership arrived in
Baku. First vice-president of the National Olympic Committee of
Armenia, Razmik Stepanyan, secretary general of NOK, Armen Grigoryan
and vice president of wrestling federation, Levon Julfalakyan, make
up the delegation. On May 4 the delegation discussed security issues
of Armenian sportsmen during world championship that will be held in
Baku this September. The sides reached mutual agreement on the issue.

OSCE PA To Send 65 Observers To Armenia Parliament Elections

OSCE PA TO SEND 65 OBSERVERS TO ARMENIA PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
May 7 2007

About 65 observers of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organisation
for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) will come to Armenia
to monitor t~[e country’s forthcoming parliamentary elections, it is
said in a statement of the Assembly’s press service ci culated here on
Monday. Parlia+entary Assembly;Vice-President Kone Tingsgaard [f Sweden
will head the delegation that comprises parliamentarians of Austria,
Germany, Denmark, Spain, Italy,ËNorway, Portugal, Russia and France.

The OSCE PA delegation will be part of an international observer
mission in which officials of the Council of Europe, European
Parliament and OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
(ODIHR) will be represented.

The international observer mission will announce its conclusion next
day !fter the elections.

Meanwhile, chairman of the country’s National Assembly, deputy head
of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia Tigran Torosyan stated here
on Monday that the electioì campaign in Armenia is going on "normally
and naturally," to which testify <nterim reports Lf international
observer missions,

The parliament speaker~Lnoted that unlike the previous ¬ampaign,
during this one politÌcal forces on tUe whole manage to avoid mutual
accusations and insults. "Desp te the growing tension, the cur<ent
campaign iL distinguished or its participants’ tolerance,|’ the
official~Lnoted.

Torosyan believes that the new parliament will comprise six to eight
factions from different political forces. He thinks the new parliament
will have no deputy groups, because most of candidates to deputy seats
under the majority election system are members of that or other party.

The speaker highly assesses his party’s chances for success both
on a multiparty list under the proportionate system and in those
27 single-mandate majority constituencies where the Republican
candidatures have been nominaed.

The elections to the Armenian parliament will be held on May 12.

Duriíg them the country will elect 131 deputies to the National
Assembly; 90 parliamentarians are rMnning under a p]oportionate andm41
– under a majority electionsystem.

–Boundary_(ID_WveiIQuZV9YBFUqPbs bOVQ)–

"The Great War" With Iran

"THE GREAT WAR" WITH IRAN
Theodore W. Karasik,
PHD in Russian History, Senior Political Scientist, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA

Eurasian Home Analytical Resource, Russia
l?lang=en&nic=expert&pid=1068&qmonth=0 &qyear=0
May 2 2007

This war that we started last year (last summer), when Israel and
Hezbollah went up against each other and Israel lost very poorly
in this mismatch. Hezbollah capabilities far exceed most terror
organizations, they are really quite sophisticated in what they do
in terms of the asymmetrical warfare and what we call the fourth
generation warfare and the net-centric warfare. The fact that Israel
took a punishing walk reverberated throughout the Middle East, and
it also reverberated throughout the Hezbollah and into Iran.

The fact is that we are now seeing the both sides – the American side
with its Gulf allies and the Iranian side – both on to the teeth,
and any trigger would set up a military confrontation. When in April
the Iranians seized 15 persisting British sailors, it was actually
the trigger that could have started a military confrontation;
and it started when Hezbollah seized the Israeli soldiers. The
confrontation with Iran if there is a trigger and when there is a
trigger, can quickly become a case of the use of American airpower
against Iranian infrastructure.

Some people would question if the Americans are widespread enough
in Iraq to conduct any kind of operation against Iran. I don’t think
it’s true, I think the Americans clearly have enough firepower to do
significant damage. The trouble with a military confrontation is what
the Iranians are going to do to retaliate. The way the Iranian military
doctrine is done is done on asymmetrical level and they have the
capabilities with them for laying mines, using small patrol boats and
also engaging and enacting the Shiite communities throughout the Gulf
region to attack Sunnis or to attack American and coalition forces.

But the attack on Iran, which I think will not take place at all,
because of the "Firestorm", is something that we need to think about.

If there’s an attack on Iran, we are going to have the implications
not only in Iran itself but also in the countries that surround Iran.

I am particularly concerned with what would happen in Azerbaijan. The
reason why is because of the economic relationships between Azerbaijan
and Iran that would be damaged in terms of the natural death. I am a
little concerned about the ethnic issue with the Azeris of northwestern
Iran and the Azeris in Azerbaijan itself. And if there was significant
damage and there were refugee floats, how would the refugee floats
impact on Azerbaijan? We already know about the refugee floats from
what happened with Nagorno Karabakh. But we can only imagine what
will happen when these refugee floats start pushing into a place like
Dagestan and this would directly affect the Russian Federation.But
we can only imagine what will happen when these refugee floats start
pushing into a place like Dagestan, and this would directly affect
the Russian Federation.

I am not so concerned about what would happen in countries such as
Turkmenistan and Tajikistan – these seem to be places that are a
little more immune, a little more distant from world where this type
of violence would occur.

With Pakistan and Afghanistan, I think that this would be extraordinary
dangerous for them, because if Iran is attacking, there will be
problems with them trying to stand back up against the state.

FUTURE DIRECTORIES FOR IRAQ

This "war" with Iran is a kind of a safe way to the future of Iraq.

We are dealing now with this extraordinary situation between the
Sunnite and Shiite worlds, the sectarian conflict that we see wracking
in Iraq today. And the way that this strife has set throughout the
Gulf region and I think affects the ummah entirely.

The big question is which direction this Shiite community of the Gulf
region is facing: are they looking at the holy cities of Iraq or are
they listening to the Iranian clerics?

The second issue here is how much sectarian violence in Iraq directly
influences both the communities: Sunni and Shiite. And what we are
having in Iraq, what I called a laboratory for military operations
and tactic, is also becoming a laboratory for religion-based
conflict. And we are now seeing that Iraq is being pulled in many
different directions. With the pull out probably coming in about
a year with some minor residuals around, I think that we need to
consider two possible futures for Iraq. One is that there need to
be a strong man, strong leader, someone like Premier Ayad Allawi,
because the central government clearly is not working, it is pulled
apart by the sectarian tensions.

The other possibility for the future of Iraq is the partition option –
break up into three states. This is not only possible but will ignite
new problems because of the Saudi, Iranian and Turkish involvement:
the Turks in Kurdistan, the Saudis in Anbar province and of course
the Iranians of the Shiite community.

Iraq as we all know is a really artificial state created after the
WWI. The situation in Iraq reminds of the same thing in Afghanistan
where partition into two or three different regions may occur,
if the central government fails. For Iraq this future is something
that we need to think about very closely in the implications for oil
policy, and especially the relationship that this country will have
with Turkey, because Turkey right now is also going through a kind
of catharsis in terms of whether it’s secular or Islamic, whether
it’s part of the Middle East or a part of Europe; and some Turkish
generals are already saying that they should invade Kurdistan. But
for the Iranians the Turkish-Iranian relationship actually benefits
from trying to stir PKK guerrillas (the Kurdistan Working Party)
who operate in the North.

AL-QAEDA IN THE ARABIAN PENINSULA

Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula has recently turned to on-line
jihadism. They put out new tactics, techniques and procedurals,
manuals in how to attack energy installations throughout the Gulf
region. They also have begun to publish more thoroughly their
positions on nonbelievers and Muslims to work with nonbelievers on
the Arabian Peninsula. This is a potential trend for more violence
against individuals whether they are Muslim or not.

Al-Qaeda is an ideology, it is not really a central organization
any more like it was three years ago. This ideology is very easily
picked up by people throughout the ummah who are seeking to reverse
what people call globalization. Al-Qaeda ideology seeks to return
to the past – for them the success of some of the countries of the
Gulf is not appropriate to their doctrine and so they seek to reverse
that order. We see Al-Qaeda’s doctrine being spread throughout the
Islamic world. Recently we saw attacks in Morocco and Algeria and
this is being done under the banner of Al-Qaeda of Maghreb. And this
is an important new plan that is going to destabilize North Africa,
unless the North-African security services and security services in
Europe crack them down. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula will widely
conduct attacks within the Gulf region in order to prove its might.

In addition it’s important to think about, if there’s military
confrontation between U.S. and Iran, how Al-Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula will take advantage of that chaos to attack western
interests. And some people would argue, wait and you will see Al-Qaeda
in the Arabian Peninsular teaming up with Iran. I don’t think this
is true because ideologically and religiously they cannot cooperate
with each other, but nevertheless Al-Qaeda can take advantage of
the situation.

WORKERS AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION WITHIN THE GULF REGION

Because of the Iraq war, there is a major refugee problem in Jordan and
some of the other countries of the region. Many Iranians are coming
to work in the Gulf, particularly in Dubai. These are also workers
from throughout the region: India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia.

Because of the economic boom of the region, there are much more
immigrants now who are paid very low wages working in unbelievable
conditions in labour houses. As a result there are more and more
riots and work stoppages and so on in the Gulf region. And this is
being whipped up by what happens in Iraq and what potentially can
happen in Iran.

I think that increasingly the Gulf states will have to deal with the
workers’ illegal immigration issue in a much more heavy-handed way.

Eventually this could become a ‘fifth column’ to some of these
countries and could ignite particular problems.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RUSSIA

The first implication is the Russian-Iranian relationship, where does
it go? Currently with the movement towards open confrontation, on the
one hand, the prices on oil will go up and this will benefit Russia
greatly, but there is the issue of sanctions and how it serves Russia.

I think Russia acts in a very courageous and good way towards Iran
and does come through when it needs to. It is my vow, that Russia
can play a very positive role in trying to make sure that there is no
armed confrontation, in other words it is trying to use connections
into Iran to lessen the tensions. We all know that Ahmadinejad, when
he talks publicly, is more talking to domestic audience than he is
to the international audience and I think we have to remember this.

Other implications for Russia are very interesting. After President
Putin gave his speech in UN attacking the United States for its
policies in Iraq and around the world, he immediately went to Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and Jordan. I think it was a brilliant master stroke
for business development in the region. This was the first visit of
the Russian president to these countries; it was also significant
because it was like a make up with the Sunni world. Visiting both
Qatar and Saudi Arabia was very positive for Russia and now you have
the potential for Russian Railways to be heavily involved in Saudi
Arabia, a LUKOIL subsidiary is already operating in the eastern
province of Saudi Arabia. Russia’s relationships with the Shiites
have always been very good because of Iran but the country’s opening
to the Sunnite world is very positive as well.

I think that these trend lines are very important as they bare
potential for great catastrophe. But by grater involvement the
international community and trying to resolve some of these issues
like having international conference, not having G8 solution, the
region will benefit better. I still believe it is up to the people
in the region to decide what needs to be done. The Saudis need to
negotiate with Iranians and vice versa, the Saudis really need to
negotiate with the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) allies, who are
really not the allies at all but just neighbors.

This text summarizes Dr. Theodore W. Karasik’s lecture "Tendencies
in the Gulf Region: Iran, Iraq and Beyond" disseminated at the Moscow
Carnegie Center on April 27.

http://www.eurasianhome.org/xml/t/expert.xm

Obituary: Mstislav Rostropovich: A superb Russian cellist and conduc

Obituary: Mstislav Rostropovich: A superb Russian cellist and conductor
whose humanity and moral stature matched his musical eminence

DESI DILLINGHAM AND TULLY POTTER, The Guardian – United Kingdom
Published: Apr 28, 2007

Cello playing in the 20th century was dominated by two outsize
personalities. If the first half belonged to Pablo Casals, the second
half was equally emphatically bestridden by Mstislav Rostropovich, who
has died aged 80. They were both not just superb all-round musicians,
but moral forces who stood out against tyranny and injustice.

Rostropovich’s birth – in Baku, capital of Azerbaijan, then part of
the Soviet Union – was not wanted, but even in the womb he asserted
himself. "My mother understood too late that she was pregnant. She
cried all over the house. My parents decided she would have to
be aborted because she already had a little child. It was a joint
decision. So my mother started to fight against me, but as you see,
I won this war." Even his birth was difficult, occurring after 10
months’ gestation.

It was a musical dynasty: his sister Veronika was a violinist, his
mother Sofia a pianist, his maternal grandmother head of a music
school; his paternal grandfather was a cellist, as was his uncle
Semyon Kozolupov, and his father Leopold (1892-1942) was a well-known
cellist and excellent teacher who had studied with Tchaikovsky’s friend
Aleksandr Wierzbilowicz, and later with Casals. Mstislav, always known
as Slava – "glory" in Russian – taught himself the piano when he was
four, and soon after that made his first attempts at composition.

He was found to have perfect pitch and at eight was studying the cello
with his father, who continued to be his teacher at the Central Music
School in Moscow. Like Casals, he insisted on doing things his way,
which in his case meant playing with a low elbow, a technique foisted
on him by an appalling fracture when he was 13. In his early teens the
family was evacuated because of the second world war to the western
Russian city of Orenburg, Sofia’s birthplace, where Slava gained his
first experience of touring with a small group to neighbouring towns.

He had been playing in public since he was eight, and at 13 he made a
modest debut with orchestra, in the Saint-Saens A minor Concerto. In
1942 a concerto he had written was played by his father, who died
later that year.

Slava entered the Moscow Conservatory in 1943 to study cello with his
uncle Kozolupov, piano with Nikolai Kuvshinnikov, and composition with
Vissarion Shebalin. He was also able to join Dmitri Shostakovich’s
orchestration class. Three years later he made his debut with the
Moscow Philharmonic, and by the time he obtained his PhD in 1948
he was recognised as one of the Soviet Union’s most brilliant
instrumentalists, almost as proficient on the piano as on the
cello. Through remaining faithful to Shostakovich, Nikolai Miaskovsky
and Sergei Prokofiev when they had been denounced by the Kremlin in
1948, he gained their friendship, and spent the summers of 1950-52
living in Prokofiev’s dacha. The main fruit of their collaboration
was the Sinfonia Concertante, revised in that period.

Around this time Rostropovich formed a sonata duo with pianist
Sviatoslav Richter and played in a trio with pianist Emil
Gilels and violinist Leonid Kogan that was the finest since the
Cortot-Thibaud-Casals combination. Like that ensemble, it folded
because of political differences between the two string players.

In 1955 he married the soprano Galina Vishnevskaya. Their recitals,
with Rostropovich at the piano, became legendary. The following year
he became a professor at the Moscow Conservatory and made his New
York and London debuts. In 1959 he visited Britain with the trio,
returning regularly from then on to play concertos. He even gave a
somewhat exotic interpretation of the Elgar Cello Concerto but gave
it up after a few performances because he did not think he could
match his pupil Jacqueline du Pre.

His friendship with Benjamin Britten dated from September 1960, when
he introduced to London the concerto Shostakovich had written for him
the previous year. Five Britten masterpieces for the cello resulted:
the Cello Sonata (1961), three solo suites (1964, 1967 and 1972),
and the Cello Symphony, which the two men first gave with the Moscow
Philharmonic in Moscow in 1964.

Two years later, Shostakovich wrote a second concerto for
Rostropovich which was even finer than the first. Indeed, unlike
Casals, Rostropovich was very much associated with new music and
inspired or commissioned works by Dutilleux, Kancheli, Khachaturian,
Lutoslawski, Penderecki, Piston, Schnittke and many others. He taught
from 1953. Among his pupils were Natalia Gutman, Karine Georgian,
Mischa Maisky, Frans Helmerson and David Geringas. His cellos
included a Storioni, the "Visconti" Stradivarius, a Goffriller, new
instruments by Peresson and Vatelot, and his favourite in later years,
the "Duport" Strad.

Despite his association with musical outsiders in the Soviet Union,
Rostropovich enjoyed most of the fruits of success, and astutely
cultivated friends in the highest circles of the Soviet government,
including the minister of the interior and members of the KGB. It was
therefore unfair of him, to say the least, to single out his colleague
Kogan as a collaborator with the regime. The stigma he placed on that
great violinist blighted the later years of Kogan’s life.

Yet faced with stark choices, Rostropovich was ready to sacrifice
everything. The support he and his wife gave Alexander Solzhenitsyn in
the late 1960s, even sheltering the beleaguered writer in their home,
was too much for the authorities, and in the early 1970s the couple
were restricted to touring inside the USSR, before they were exiled
in 1974 and became "unpersons". Rostropovich’s name was expunged from
scores dedicated to him, Vishnevskaya was removed from the official
history of the Bolshoi Theatre, and in 1978 they were stripped of
their Soviet citizenship.

Far from repining in the West, Rostropovich enjoyed a champagne
lifestyle with homes in Britain, Switzerland, France and the US. He
attracted some of the highest fees in the music business and no longer
had to hand the money to a greedy state. Then the political climate
changed, and when Mikhail Gorbachev’s transformation of the Soviet
bloc led to the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, Rostropovich
played Bach cello suites all night at the frontier in sheer joy.

The marriage to Vishnevskaya survived his blatant womanising and
they continued to make music together, on the concert stage and in
the recording studio. They returned on tour to Russia in February
1990, and 18 months later Rostropovich flew in from Paris to help
bolster the opposition of Boris Yeltsin (obituary, April 24) to the
attempted coup by communist hardliners. Having taken the precaution
of writing a farewell letter to his absent wife, Rostropovich blagged
his way through Moscow airport and got to the barricaded White House
parliament building.

Yeltsin later wrote that Rostropovich’s arrival there, and request
for the loan of an assault rifle for a while, played a crucial role
in restoring calm. It has been suggested that awareness that he was
playing the cello all night was a major factor in dissuading the
troops outside from shelling the White House. The musician saw it as
"the most serious and difficult moment for my country".

That storm weathered, in December 1991 the Soviet Union dissolved
itself. Rostropovich was rewarded with the State Prize, but his
relationship with Russia retained an element of prickliness. After
a concert for Solzhenitsyn’s 80th birthday in 1998 which culminated
in him kissing the writer – a gesture seen on television – he was
accused of taking any opportunity to promote his Russian comeback,
and so swore he would never play there again.

Yet the Rostropovich Foundation, set up by him and his wife, was
responsible for vaccinating more than two million Russian children
against disease, and by the early years of the new decade he announced
that, having forgiven everyone, he was going to enjoy himself. This
reconciliation was reflected last February in acceptance from President
Putin of the Order of Merit award, first degree, for Rostropovich’s
"outstanding contribution to the development of the musical arts
worldwide and many years of creative work".

In his later years the cellist turned more to conducting, notably
with the National Symphony Orchestra, Washington DC (1977-94), and in
Britain as a guest with the London Philharmonic and London Symphony
orchestras. This career move did not meet with universal approval,
as his success was patchy. His tempi could be turgid and the moments
of unique inspiration did not always make up for the lumpy, graceless
balancing of the orchestral textures. His greatest successes on
the podium were achieved in the works of his friends Prokofiev,
Shostakovich and Alfred Schnittke.

As the years went by even his cello playing became more eccentric. His
interpretation of the Dvorak Cello Concerto degenerated into a string
of grotesque mannerisms, although no one who heard it will forget the
performance he gave of this Czech masterpiece at a Promenade Concert
broadcast from the Royal Albert Hall in London, with the USSR State
Symphony Orchestra under Evgeny Svetlanov, on the evening of the day
in August 1968 when his compatriots invaded Czechoslovakia. Tears
streaming down his cheeks, he followed the concerto with an
unforgettable reading of the Sarabande from Bach’s Second solo suite.

At his best, he was an incomparable instrumentalist, as hundreds of
recordings attest. A shortlist would include the various Britten,
Prokofiev and Shostakovich works, the concertos by Lutoslawski and
Dutilleux, the trios with Gilels and Kogan, the Dvorak concerto with
Boult and the Brahms sonatas with Serkin. When he was on form his
personality carried all before it and his actual playing, wonderfully
secure in tone and technique even in the fastest passages, was in
a class of its own. When he stopped playing in public in 2005, the
refulgent sound of his cello was much missed.

Rostropovich was an artist to his fingertips. His various dwellings
were full of beautiful objects, many of them chosen to remind him of
his homeland and its history. In private, he was passionate, extrovert,
volatile and voluble. Theatre people speak of being Trevved by Trevor
Nunn, who famously enfolds friends in massive embraces. Musical folk
found the experience of being Slava’d even more overwhelming. It
involved being kissed on both cheeks and being made to feel that,
for a few moments at least, you were the only person in his life.

He is survived by his wife and their two daughters, Olga and Elena.

Tully Potter

Robert Ponsonby writes: When the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra came
to the Edinburgh Festival in 1960, its conductors were Evgeny Mravinsky
and Gennadi Rozhdestvensky. Its only soloist was Rostropovich, who
contributed Shostakovich’s First Cello Concerto and, in recital,
Brahms, Bach and Prokofiev – impassioned, bravura performances, all
technically immaculate and glowing with the warmth of his personality.

He was a star of the festival and I asked him to play in the Toy
Symphony which I was to conduct on its last day. He happily agreed
and suggested that Rozhdestvensky join him. So I allocated them the
triangle, though which of them held the instrument and which hit it
I do not now remember. They were of course note-perfect (as were
Leonide Massine on rattle and the conductors Vittorio Gui on drum
and Alexander Gibson on nightingale). Slava was enchanted and asked
for the score and parts to take back to Moscow.

He subsequently came to the Glasgow Proms and delivered a marvellous
Dvorak concerto. It was a Saturday night and when I took him to his
train, he could not but notice the unbridled conduct of Glaswegian
youth. "Kissing?" he said, with a kind of benignly quizzical curiosity.

Then, in 1984, I was the guest of conductor Paul Sacher at a concert
in Basel when Slava again played the Dvorak concerto. Self-evidently
he was in terrific form, and at dinner afterwards announced that
he wished to demonstrate that you could get a champagne cork out of
the bottle with a sabre, if you had one. And it so happened that he
did. It hung from his waist in a military scabbard.

Within a minute, by dint of downward slashing and hacking, the
cork was out (with much champagne). The demonstration had been so
rapturously received that – at the brandy stage – Slava announced
that he would repeat it. I held my breath as the second cork came
out during a slightly tipsy, rather sentimental, quintessentially
Russian, monologue in praise of Sacher. As before, those precious hands
survived, and I was in due course embraced in a tremendous bear-hug.

His humanity matched both his musical eminence and his political
bravado. He was often impulsive, boyish, mischievous, on one occasion
muddling up all the shoes left outside bedroom doors for polishing
in the hotel where he was staying. This was, I think, during a
holiday he arranged for Peter Pears and Benjamin Britten, whom he
venerated. Pears’s diary, published privately as Armenian Holiday –
August 1965, paints an enchanting portrait of a glorious musician
and a glorious man. Tully Potter

Desi Dillingham writes: I had the honour of being Slava’s neighbour and
friend in Little Venice, west London, for the last 18 years. He was
a delight, often phoning to ask for a special favour – and often one
that would not be easy to deliver – such as a dinner party for 10 in
his flat that evening. The request would always end with "if you can’t
help me, I suicide immediate". He spoke, it was said, 10 languages,
none of them well.

In return, he swept myself and Virginia Devaal, another London
friend whose help he had called on, off to Russia. The last big
outing came in May 2005, to Moscow, for his and Galina’s 50th wedding
anniversary. There was a member of every royal family of Europe there
(except the Prince of Wales, since he was on his honeymoon) to help
celebrate, as well as Yeltsin.

Putin telephoned halfway through the evening to award Slava the
Peter the Great Medal – the first time it had been given out since
the October 1917 revolution. Indeed, this was the first time so many
royals had been on Russian soil together since then.

Slava was a great humanitarian, giving concerts all round the world
for all sorts of charities – for the street children of Brazil,
for causes supported by US presidents, and for children in Russia.

He was fully aware of his good fortune. Many times he would say after
an emotional standing ovation at the end of a concert that he had
"more friends there" (pointing to heaven) than here.

Mstislav Leopoldovich Rostropovich, cellist, pianist and conductor,
born March 27 1927; died April 27 2007

AYF DC: Armenian Americans Demand Justice at Turkish Embassy Protest

Armenian Youth Federation
Washington Ani Chapter
4906 Flint Drive
Bethesda, MD 20816

PRESS RELEASE
April 27, 2007
Contact: Serouj Aprahamian
(202) 742-8707; [email protected]

Greater Washington DC Area Armenian Americans Demand End to Turkish
Denial of Armenian Genocide

"Get on the Bus for Genocide Recognition" Campaign Takes Anti-
Genocide Message to the Turkish Embassy; Halls of Congress

Washington, DC – A crowd of over 600 Armenian Americans, anti-
genocide activists and concerned citizens gathered on April 24th in
front of the Turkish Embassy in Washington, DC, to mark the 92nd
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide and demand an end to the
Turkish government’s campaign of genocide denial, reported the
Armenian Youth Federation (AYF) Washington "Ani" Chapter.

The annual protest has been organized by the AYF on April 24th -the
international Armenian Genocide commemorative day-for over 25
years.

Demonstrators from throughout the Greater Washington DC
metropolitan area, and as far away as Richmond, VA, made their way
to the nation’s capital on several school buses organized as part
of the "Get on the Bus for Genocide Recognition" Campaign.
Participants held signs calling for remembrance of the 1.5 million
victims of the Armenian Genocide and denouncing the Turkish
government’s shameless attempts to suppress history.

The large representation of youth among the crowd exemplified the
Armenian community’s ongoing commitment to achieve proper
recognition of the Armenian Genocide. "Nearly a century after the
horrible events of 1915, we see that the youth have not forgotten
the crimes committed against their people. Despite growing up away
from their ancestral homeland, they have maintained their history
and dedicated themselves to the cause of justice for the Armenian
Genocide," said AYF Spokesperson Tsoghig Hekimian.

Also in attendance were anti-genocide activists and members of the
Greek community who came to show their solidarity with Armenians
and call on Turkey to end its 33-year occupation of Northern
Cyprus.

As the demonstration neared its end, AYF "Ani" Chapter Chairperson,
Serouj Aprahamian addressed the energized crowd by emphasizing the
human consequences of Turkey’s unpunished crimes. "After Turkey
got away with the Armenian Genocide, it continued its atrocities
against the Greeks, the Cypriots, and later the Kurds. It served
as a model for Hitler’s Holocaust and other genocidal regimes such
as the current one in Sudan. We stand together here today and
demand recognition of the Armenian Genocide, not just for
Armenians, but for all of humanity, in the quest to end the cycle
of genocide," stated Aprahamian.

Following the demonstration, attendees got back on their buses and
headed to Capitol Hill for the 12th annual Capitol Hill Observance
of the Armenian Genocide, hosted by the Congressional Caucus on
Armenian Issues. Over 10 Members of Congress addressed attendees,
during the two hour program, lead by Congressional Armenian Caucus
Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI).
Speakers commended Armenian American community participants for
their ongoing efforts to educate Congress about the Armenian
Genocide and urged passage of pending legislation – H.Res.106 and
S. Res. 106. Amb. John Evans, former U.S. Ambassador to Armenia
who was fired for his accurate portrayal of the Armenian Genocide,
also urged passage of the resolution.

###

042407_dcdemo2: Armenian youth demands justice at
April 24th demonstration at Turkish Embassy in Washington, DC

eshoo_ayf.jpg: Armenian Youth Federation
Washington Sevan Junior Chapter members with Rep.
Anna Eshoo (D-CA) at the April 24th Capitol Hill Armenian Genocide Observance.

Pryakhin Is Concerned over Voters’ Passivity

PRYAKHIN IS CONCERNED OVER VOTERS’ PASSIVITY

A1+
[09:28 pm] 27 April, 2007

Ambassador Vladimir Pryakhin, the Head of the OSCE Office in Yerevan,
observes relative passivity among the Armenian voters. He is concerned
over the fact that half of the voters have no intention to participate
in the upcoming elections.

"I cannot say what factors their inactivity is determined by, but
the recent polling results suggest that over 90 per cent of the
Armenian voters don’t connect their futures with the outcome of the
parliamentary elections," Mr Pryakhin says.

In his opinion, the Armenians are more united over the NKR conflict
resolution but in most cases they remain indifferent. Armenian families
mainly get financial assistance from oversea countries.

In this view, I want to remind that active civil participation promotes
democracy in the country.

In reply to A1+’s question how he assesses the pre-election scene
in Armenia, Mr Pryakhin said, "In comparison with 2003 elections,
I see many positive achievements. Let’s take the amended Electoral
Code as an illustration. We have issued two booklets covering voters’
rights and duties," Mr Pryakhin adds.

Synopsys To Continue Cooperation With SEUA

SYNOPSYS TO CONTINUE COOPERATION WITH SEUA

YEREVAN, APRIL 28, NOYAN TAPAN. The cooperation between Synopsys
company, the world leader in electronic automated design, and State
Engineering University of Armenia (SEUA) is unique as compared
with the company’s cooperation with 450 universities troughout the
world. Hovik Musaelian, Director General of Synopsys Armenia CJSC –
Synopsys’ Armenian subsidiary, expressed this opinion at the April
27 meeting with SEUA students.

According to him, SEUA students of the interdepartmental chair
"Microelectronic Circuits and Systems" operating by a program of
Synopsys Armenia receive their knowledge by the innovation circle
"education-science-production".

It was noted that those who completed their second year of studies
may become students of the following SEUA departments: "Computer
Systems and Information Science", "Cybernetics", "Radio Engineering
and Communication Facilities".

In the words of H. Musaelian, both in 2006 and this year, 70 students
(in addition to 184 ones) continue their studies at the above
mantioned chair.

55.7% of the chair graduates work at Synopsys Armenia, making up 29.2%
of the 370 employees of the company. This is the second one among 65
subsidiaries operating in 22 countries. The company also cooperates
with Yerevan State University (YSU) and the State Slavonic University
(SSU). Synopsys installed electronic design-related 50 software
packages of 260 mln USD at SEUA and 30 software packages of 150 mln
USD – at YSU.

Former U.S. envoy to Armenia tells how 1 word ended his career

McClatchy Newspapers
Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007
WASHINGTON
Former U.S. envoy to Armenia tells how 1 word ended his career
By Michael Doyle

WASHINGTON – Ambassador John Evans ended one life and started another when
he uttered one remarkable word: genocide.
As the U.S. ambassador to Armenia, and a career diplomat, Evans knew the
uses of circumlocution. Some words, he understood, must be avoided. But
then, speaking in Fresno, Los Angeles and Berkeley, Calif., two years ago,
Evans violated U.S. policy by declaring that Armenians were the victims of a
genocide from 1915 to 1923.
"Clearly, I had stepped out of the box," Evans said in an interview. "But
what I didn’t know precisely was what the reaction would be."
He found out soon enough.
Evans’ State Department superiors published apologies in his name. They cut
him out of decision-making, then ended his ambassador’s posting altogether.
His Foreign Service career collapsed, while his fellow diplomats debated
whether he was heroic or foolhardy.
"I had some colleagues who managed to tell me I did the right thing," Evans
said, "and I had others who were dubious."
The fallout continues: The United States still lacks a permanent ambassador
in Yerevan because of Senate discontent with Evans’ treatment.
April 24 is the day that Armenians worldwide commemorate the start of the
1915 horrors. Members of Congress will give speeches. President Bush will
issue a traditional declaration, omitting the linchpin word "genocide."
Evans will speak freely at the National Press Club, something he couldn’t do
during his 35-year State Department career. He also has written a
manuscript, for which he’s seeking a book publisher.
"I came to what I felt was an ethical dilemma," Evans said. "I felt I could
not carry out the policy of denial of the Armenian genocide."
April 24, 1915, was when leaders of the Ottoman Empire’s Young Turk
government began rounding up Armenian leaders. What happened next is
unsettling history. Armenians say an estimated 1.5 million died.
Numerous historians and myriad state and foreign governments have concluded
that the Ottoman Empire events amounted to genocide.
Under international law adopted in 1948, genocide is the "intent to destroy,
in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group." It
covers killing and deliberately inflicting "conditions of life calculated to
bring about (the population’s) physical destruction in whole or in part."
Turkey fiercely opposes the description of the Armenian deaths as genocide,
maintaining that the Armenians were caught in a complex, multi-front war and
that considerably fewer than 1.5 million died.
The diaspora cast Armenians out to U.S. areas that include California’s San
Joaquin Valley, New Jersey and Michigan. These concentrated populations
prompted American politicians to take up the Armenian cause.
"The failure of the domestic and international authorities to punish those
responsible for the Armenian Genocide is a reason why similar genocides have
recurred and may recur in the future," says a pending House of
Representatives resolution that Rep. George Radanovich, R-Calif.,
co-authored this year.
Some 190 members co-sponsored the resolution. It hasn’t been scheduled for a
vote yet, amid intense lobbying. Last week, members of the Turkish
Parliament lobbied against it.
The Bush administration opposes the resolution, as did the Clinton
administration. Although President Reagan officially recognized "the
genocide of the Armenians" in April 1981, the standard administration
response has been resistance.
"It’s a tragedy; everybody agrees with that," Richard Hoagland, Bush’s
nominee to replace Evans, declared at his Senate confirmation hearing last
June, but "instead of getting stuck in the past and vocabulary, I would like
to see what we can do to bring different sides together."
His nomination has been frozen, caught in the Capitol Hill conflict. The
resolution’s fate turns on whether House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.,
kills the bill at Bush’s request, Radanovich predicted.
Now 58, Evans said that no one had warned him explicitly to watch his words
before he became ambassador to Armenia in 2004. Everyone simply knew, he
said, that "there was a taboo" against the word genocide. He eventually
decided that he needed to "help people understand" the history.
"I chose to do something which goes against the grain of every diplomat,"
Evans said, and that was "to break with the policy of the United States
government."
When his comments became widely known, the State Department issued
apologies. The statements included made-up quotes that Evans now says others
crafted and attributed to him.
"Let’s put it this way: I had no role in it," he said of the statements.
The State Department stresses that ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the
president, and officials have publicly denied that Evans was pulled from
Yerevan prematurely.
Nonetheless, he and his wife, Donna, have been living at their daughter’s
house in New York since last September. They can’t move back into their own
Washington-area home yet, because they had rented it out for the full three
years they had expected to be in Armenia.

RA And AR Presidents’ Meeting To Be Held In Saint Petersburg June 10

RA AND AR PRESIDENTS’ MEETING TO BE HELD IN SAINT PETERSBURG JUNE 10

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
April 27 2007

June 10 RA and AR Presidents’ meeting is planned to be held in Saint
Petersburg, Robert Kocharian stated at a meeting with the students
of the Yerevan State University.

He noted he was not very optimistic about the meeting. "The Ministers’
latest meeting proceeded in a calmer atmosphere than the previous
one, which gave ground for optimistic statements," RA President said,
PanARMENIAN.Net reports.